Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

A small chip inside this year’s World Cup match ball is helping referees make faster and more accurate calls. The sensor tracks the ball’s movement 500 times per second, capturing every touch and movement in real time. This gives officials more precise data to review during key moments of...

TIME's profile picture

TIME

18,525,622 subscribers

63,310 просмотров • 29 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The World Cup ball is doing more than keeping play moving. Hidden inside is a sensor that tracks every touch, helping match officials make faster and more accurate decisions.
1:17

The World Cup ball is doing more than keeping play moving. Hidden inside is a sensor that tracks every touch, helping match officials make faster and more accurate decisions.

The Associated Press

197,336 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

On England's first goal of the match, the ball seemed to hit the cable of a camera. FIFA Media released a statement that the ball sensor did not peak in the sequence. #FIFAWorldCup
1:59

On England's first goal of the match, the ball seemed to hit the cable of a camera. FIFA Media released a statement that the ball sensor did not peak in the sequence. #FIFAWorldCup

TSN

445,055 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The balls at this year's World Cup need to be charged before each match and feature special sensors that collect spatial positioning data in real-time.
1:00

The balls at this year's World Cup need to be charged before each match and feature special sensors that collect spatial positioning data in real-time.

Joe Pompliano

199,218 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.
1:08

The 3D data from FIFA's cameras around the stadium seem to contradict FIFA's official statement that the ball never made contact with the camera cable in Norway vs England. FIFA has 16 dedicated high resolution optical cameras positioned around every World Cup stadium to capture player and ball movements throughout the match. They use these to create the precise 3D renderings of gameplay which are used in-game for things like offsides graphics and then also used by broadcasters to create programming visuals. In this rendering, you can see the ball "hitch" in the air at the moment it supposedly contacted the cable. Now that by itself is interesting, but the part that really convinces me is the behavior of the English player that comes up to play the ball. This is especially clear in the second wide-angle shot. Watch his angle on the ball. Watch what angle he takes before the ball hitches in the air and then after. He clearly has to adjust his angle to play the ball...and suspiciously, that adjustment happens right after it takes that hitch and appears to change trajectory. To me, this is fairly compelling evidence that the ball hit the cable. This brings up a very interesting point though...this comes from FIFA's data. They would have had access to this in their analysis of the event. Which begs the question...why would they release some statement claiming no evidence of the ball contacting the cable existed when their own data seems to suggest that it did? Just adds to the mounting list of procedural questions that have really overshadowed the actual gameplay of this World Cup.

Mark Valorian

149,375 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇺🇸 FIFA’s official match ball hides a high-tech sensor that tracks every spin, kick, and touch at lightning speed. These creators built their own version with custom hardware to show exactly how it works, and the results are seriously impressive. Football is going full sci-fi! Writer: Daniyal
1:10

🇺🇸 FIFA’s official match ball hides a high-tech sensor that tracks every spin, kick, and touch at lightning speed. These creators built their own version with custom hardware to show exactly how it works, and the results are seriously impressive. Football is going full sci-fi! Writer: Daniyal

Mario Nawfal

34,359 просмотров • 23 дней назад

The most controversial moments in sports. 1.) Diego Maradona, is famous for his "Hand of God" goal during the 1986 World Cup. This controversial moment happened in a quarterfinal match against England on June 22, 1986, in Mexico City. Six minutes into the second half, with the game scoreless, England's Steve Hodge accidentally kicked the ball into his own penalty area. Maradona jumped and used his fist to punch the ball past England's goalkeeper, Peter Shilton, scoring a goal. Using hands is illegal in soccer, but the referee, Ali Bin Nasser, did not see the foul, and despite the English players' protests, the goal stood. After the match, Maradona famously said the goal was made "a little with the head of Maradona and a little with the hand of God." Argentina went on to win the 1986 World Cup. Maradona died in 2020 at 60 years old. In November 2022, the ball from the "Hand of God" goal was auctioned as part of a World Cup memorabilia sale.
0:58

The most controversial moments in sports. 1.) Diego Maradona, is famous for his "Hand of God" goal during the 1986 World Cup. This controversial moment happened in a quarterfinal match against England on June 22, 1986, in Mexico City. Six minutes into the second half, with the game scoreless, England's Steve Hodge accidentally kicked the ball into his own penalty area. Maradona jumped and used his fist to punch the ball past England's goalkeeper, Peter Shilton, scoring a goal. Using hands is illegal in soccer, but the referee, Ali Bin Nasser, did not see the foul, and despite the English players' protests, the goal stood. After the match, Maradona famously said the goal was made "a little with the head of Maradona and a little with the hand of God." Argentina went on to win the 1986 World Cup. Maradona died in 2020 at 60 years old. In November 2022, the ball from the "Hand of God" goal was auctioned as part of a World Cup memorabilia sale.

Fascinating

9,957,658 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 Explaining How Messi 1 of 1 jerseys in this World Cup could be worth $20m in the future because of its special patches and legacy badges. That World Cup hatrick jersey as the oldest player to do it, and to match the all time goal record might be worth $25m in the future
3:08

🚨 Explaining How Messi 1 of 1 jerseys in this World Cup could be worth $20m in the future because of its special patches and legacy badges. That World Cup hatrick jersey as the oldest player to do it, and to match the all time goal record might be worth $25m in the future

Football Matter

45,934 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

*Red Ball vs White Ball* - New episode 180 Not Out When the first International match of cricket was played between the US and Canada in 1844, nobody watching it or nobody playing it could have possibly imagined the fame that cricket would one day reach. Much has changed since then, and perhaps the biggest signifier of this change is the White Ball. Still ‘Red Ball Cricket’ continues to be seen as the purer form of the game, dominated by classic shots and a methodical approach, while White Ball limited-overs cricket is the faster, younger, trending version of the game, and rightly so too! Listen to what Legends think about this battle of Cricket. Rate and Review if you can...... English : Hindi:
0:32

*Red Ball vs White Ball* - New episode 180 Not Out When the first International match of cricket was played between the US and Canada in 1844, nobody watching it or nobody playing it could have possibly imagined the fame that cricket would one day reach. Much has changed since then, and perhaps the biggest signifier of this change is the White Ball. Still ‘Red Ball Cricket’ continues to be seen as the purer form of the game, dominated by classic shots and a methodical approach, while White Ball limited-overs cricket is the faster, younger, trending version of the game, and rightly so too! Listen to what Legends think about this battle of Cricket. Rate and Review if you can...... English : Hindi:

Raman Raheja

13,847 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Does everyone remember how this started with President Putin and President Trump passing the soccer ball in Helsinki? We also know the activation word is Ronald McDonald. Yesterday there was a video of the tunnels in Mexico and we see this strange video from McDonald’s. We also see that the World Cup soccer players are eating at McDonald’s. What do you see in this video? are you putting the pieces together? This all began with a soccer ball and the World Cup is this year 2026. I do believe this will all end with the soccer ball. Q and anons World Cup 2026 ! Throw the “Baal”
2:00

Does everyone remember how this started with President Putin and President Trump passing the soccer ball in Helsinki? We also know the activation word is Ronald McDonald. Yesterday there was a video of the tunnels in Mexico and we see this strange video from McDonald’s. We also see that the World Cup soccer players are eating at McDonald’s. What do you see in this video? are you putting the pieces together? This all began with a soccer ball and the World Cup is this year 2026. I do believe this will all end with the soccer ball. Q and anons World Cup 2026 ! Throw the “Baal”

kooQlarue

23,931 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing
0:21

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

74,430 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Soccer skills are always appreciated during the FIFA World Cup tournament. Watched this multiple times and it’s amazing to me the ball never touches the ground. And in jeans…
0:25

Soccer skills are always appreciated during the FIFA World Cup tournament. Watched this multiple times and it’s amazing to me the ball never touches the ground. And in jeans…

Dweller

205,614 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

THE REIGN IN SPAIN: #Spain substitute Ferran Torres scored in the 106th minute to give his team a 1-0 win over defending champion #Argentina in the FIFA World Cup final on Sunday in New Jersey, earning the country's second World Cup title. In the opening moment of the second 15-minute period of extra time, Torres pounced on a bouncing ball in the box and used his left foot to bury a shot just under the crossbar and into the back of the net. It was the 104th and last match of the biggest World Cup ever, a 48-team event that played out in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. For more on the World Cup Final, watch "Wake Up America," tomorrow at 7 AM ET on NEWSMAX. #Spain #Argentina #FIFA #WorldCup
0:30

THE REIGN IN SPAIN: #Spain substitute Ferran Torres scored in the 106th minute to give his team a 1-0 win over defending champion #Argentina in the FIFA World Cup final on Sunday in New Jersey, earning the country's second World Cup title. In the opening moment of the second 15-minute period of extra time, Torres pounced on a bouncing ball in the box and used his left foot to bury a shot just under the crossbar and into the back of the net. It was the 104th and last match of the biggest World Cup ever, a 48-team event that played out in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. For more on the World Cup Final, watch "Wake Up America," tomorrow at 7 AM ET on NEWSMAX. #Spain #Argentina #FIFA #WorldCup

NEWSMAX

29,268 просмотров • 23 дней назад

“Before they even kick a ball later, Ghana have already qualified, and that alone is a statement. This is a reminder that African football is not here to beg for respect; it is here to take it. The whole world needs to give Ghana the respect they deserve.” — The LFC girl reacts to Ghana’s qualification for the Round of 32 at the World Cup.
1:34

“Before they even kick a ball later, Ghana have already qualified, and that alone is a statement. This is a reminder that African football is not here to beg for respect; it is here to take it. The whole world needs to give Ghana the respect they deserve.” — The LFC girl reacts to Ghana’s qualification for the Round of 32 at the World Cup.

𝐀𝐒𝐊

21,852 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This is not offense down the stretch. 1st clip - Last possession in regulation for Wake. Juke Harris isolation at the top of the key with no ball screen and no off ball movement 2nd clip - Sebastian Akins and Myles Colvin take the shot clock down to about 10 seconds left and just pass the ball back and forth a couple times. I repeat, THIS IS NOT OFFENSE. This especially cannot be your offense in crunch time.
0:26

This is not offense down the stretch. 1st clip - Last possession in regulation for Wake. Juke Harris isolation at the top of the key with no ball screen and no off ball movement 2nd clip - Sebastian Akins and Myles Colvin take the shot clock down to about 10 seconds left and just pass the ball back and forth a couple times. I repeat, THIS IS NOT OFFENSE. This especially cannot be your offense in crunch time.

Brandon Meeks

16,248 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Giving Rodri the World Cup Golden Ball over Messi wasn’t deserved — One of the most baffling decisions I've ever witnessed at a World Cup. Rodri is the heartbeat of Spain’s system, no doubt about it. But you can’t hand him the tournament’s best player award based mainly on his performances in the semifinal and final. Many people debated the controversies surrounding Argentina throughout this World Cup, but FIFA's decision to give the Golden Ball to Rodri instead of Lionel Messi was beyond belief. Messi deserved every individual award this tournament had to offer. He delivered world-class performances in every match for Argentina. If the Golden Ball isn't awarded to the best player of the tournament, then what is its purpose? Players give everything on the pitch to earn that recognition. Rodri is an outstanding footballer, but based on this World Cup alone, there is no comparison between him and Messi. The statistics speak for themselves. The performances speak for themselves. That's why this is one of the most baffling decisions I've ever witnessed at a World Cup. There’s also a huge difference in the strength of the two national teams, yet that wasn’t properly taken into account. Neither was individual performance. This isn’t about statistics alone. Rodri is incredibly important and influential to his team. Messi is just as essential—arguably even more so. Not simply because of goals or assists, but because of everything he means to his team. Both are the heart of their sides, but Messi had the added edge of consistently deciding games. Since the award ultimately went to a player from the finalists, the comparison is straightforward. I honestly don’t know what they were thinking by giving it to Rodri. For me, Lionel Messi deserved the World Cup Golden Ball without a second thought.
3:09

Giving Rodri the World Cup Golden Ball over Messi wasn’t deserved — One of the most baffling decisions I've ever witnessed at a World Cup. Rodri is the heartbeat of Spain’s system, no doubt about it. But you can’t hand him the tournament’s best player award based mainly on his performances in the semifinal and final. Many people debated the controversies surrounding Argentina throughout this World Cup, but FIFA's decision to give the Golden Ball to Rodri instead of Lionel Messi was beyond belief. Messi deserved every individual award this tournament had to offer. He delivered world-class performances in every match for Argentina. If the Golden Ball isn't awarded to the best player of the tournament, then what is its purpose? Players give everything on the pitch to earn that recognition. Rodri is an outstanding footballer, but based on this World Cup alone, there is no comparison between him and Messi. The statistics speak for themselves. The performances speak for themselves. That's why this is one of the most baffling decisions I've ever witnessed at a World Cup. There’s also a huge difference in the strength of the two national teams, yet that wasn’t properly taken into account. Neither was individual performance. This isn’t about statistics alone. Rodri is incredibly important and influential to his team. Messi is just as essential—arguably even more so. Not simply because of goals or assists, but because of everything he means to his team. Both are the heart of their sides, but Messi had the added edge of consistently deciding games. Since the award ultimately went to a player from the finalists, the comparison is straightforward. I honestly don’t know what they were thinking by giving it to Rodri. For me, Lionel Messi deserved the World Cup Golden Ball without a second thought.

🅱🅸🅲🅷⚽️🆈

15,044 просмотров • 22 дней назад

Volpe gets absolutely nothing on his throws because of his mechanics. Upper half opens up early, and he ends up guiding the ball to first on the throw because he has no power left by the time he’s releasing the ball. This along with his hesitancy to attack grounders basically gives the runner a few more steps to first than he should have by the time the ball is released.
1:12

Volpe gets absolutely nothing on his throws because of his mechanics. Upper half opens up early, and he ends up guiding the ball to first on the throw because he has no power left by the time he’s releasing the ball. This along with his hesitancy to attack grounders basically gives the runner a few more steps to first than he should have by the time the ball is released.

Yankeesource

258,962 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

The opportunity of a lifetime is on the line. Do these young players ​have what it takes to rep Team USA at the Kia Official Match Ball Carrier Cup? Follow our journey on the road to the FIFA World Cup 2026™!
0:41

The opportunity of a lifetime is on the line. Do these young players ​have what it takes to rep Team USA at the Kia Official Match Ball Carrier Cup? Follow our journey on the road to the FIFA World Cup 2026™!

Kia America

4,186,602 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

The opportunity of a lifetime is on the line. Do these young players ​have what it takes to rep Team USA at the Kia Official Match Ball Carrier Cup? Follow our journey on the road to the FIFA World Cup 2026™!
0:32

The opportunity of a lifetime is on the line. Do these young players ​have what it takes to rep Team USA at the Kia Official Match Ball Carrier Cup? Follow our journey on the road to the FIFA World Cup 2026™!

Kia America

3,670,811 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Croatia was kicked out of the match because Matanic touched the ball with his hair AND the referee had to decide if Viega’s contact with the ball is considered “deliberate play”. If yes, the goal was correct, but the referee decided “no”. But what are the rules saying? In FIFA and IFAB Laws of the Game, deliberate play is when a player has control of the ball and attempts to pass, gain possession, or clear it. *‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of: •passing the ball to a team-mate; •gaining possession of the ball; or •clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) ➡️clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) And that’s what Viega did. He cleared the ball. But a Croatian player managed to intercept the ball before it went out of play; that led to the goal. Croatia was robbed. Source in comments.
2:07

Croatia was kicked out of the match because Matanic touched the ball with his hair AND the referee had to decide if Viega’s contact with the ball is considered “deliberate play”. If yes, the goal was correct, but the referee decided “no”. But what are the rules saying? In FIFA and IFAB Laws of the Game, deliberate play is when a player has control of the ball and attempts to pass, gain possession, or clear it. *‘Deliberate play’ (excluding deliberate handball) is when a player has control of the ball with the possibility of: •passing the ball to a team-mate; •gaining possession of the ball; or •clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) ➡️clearing the ball (e.g. by kicking or heading it) And that’s what Viega did. He cleared the ball. But a Croatian player managed to intercept the ball before it went out of play; that led to the goal. Croatia was robbed. Source in comments.

Goran Majić

35,114 просмотров • 1 месяц назад