Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

A Stanford PhD student built a system that turns any research paper into a working AI agent. It's called Paper2Agent. I watched her demo it live and couldn't believe what I was seeing. Here's exactly what happened. She pasted a 40-page NeurIPS paper into the tool. Within seconds it...

ihtesham2005's profile picture

Ihtesham Ali

43,090 subscribers

67,959 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

AN OPENCLAW AI AGENT JUST DESIGNED A 3D CHARACTER IN BLENDER AND SENT IT TO A 3D PRINTER. SHE DIDN'T TOUCH A SINGLE BUTTON. This is what running an OpenClaw AI agent on a Mac Mini actually looks like. She described what she wanted. The agent did everything else. Blender opened automatically. Character designed. Put in space. Animated with blinking eyes and stomping feet. Landing page built and live. Model sliced. File sent to 3D printer. Printer started moving. All from conversation. Zero code. Zero design skills. Zero manual work. Here's why this matters beyond the demo: Custom 3D printed figures sell for $30-$200 each on Etsy and at conventions. The people making serious money aren't artists. They're the ones who can produce custom designs fast. An AI agent that goes from description to printed figure autonomously is a business model not a toy. "I was just talking to the guy and he made it happen." Bookmark this. Full demo in the video below.
1:29

AN OPENCLAW AI AGENT JUST DESIGNED A 3D CHARACTER IN BLENDER AND SENT IT TO A 3D PRINTER. SHE DIDN'T TOUCH A SINGLE BUTTON. This is what running an OpenClaw AI agent on a Mac Mini actually looks like. She described what she wanted. The agent did everything else. Blender opened automatically. Character designed. Put in space. Animated with blinking eyes and stomping feet. Landing page built and live. Model sliced. File sent to 3D printer. Printer started moving. All from conversation. Zero code. Zero design skills. Zero manual work. Here's why this matters beyond the demo: Custom 3D printed figures sell for $30-$200 each on Etsy and at conventions. The people making serious money aren't artists. They're the ones who can produce custom designs fast. An AI agent that goes from description to printed figure autonomously is a business model not a toy. "I was just talking to the guy and he made it happen." Bookmark this. Full demo in the video below.

SCOTTY BEAM

17,209 views • 2 months ago

Turn any paper into running code. Just swap arxiv → autoarxiv in the paper url. That hands the paper to an AI agent from alphaXiv. It reads the abstract, the claims, and the linked GitHub repo, then clones the codebase and works through the usual setup pain like dependencies, broken paths, environment config, and hardware assumptions. From there it designs a minimal reproduction. That means a smaller model, fewer steps, and a single GPU instead of a cluster, scaled down just enough to test whether the headline claim holds. The whole run is live and fully logged. Loss curves, metrics, and training progress are all observable as it happens. What comes back is a clean signal on whether the minimal run matches the paper's reported result, plus an estimate of what a full replication would cost in compute and time. A lot of research code dies in setup before anyone verifies a single number. This moves reproduction from a weekend of debugging to a url change. Pick a paper and try it now. video credits: alphaXiv
0:44

Turn any paper into running code. Just swap arxiv → autoarxiv in the paper url. That hands the paper to an AI agent from alphaXiv. It reads the abstract, the claims, and the linked GitHub repo, then clones the codebase and works through the usual setup pain like dependencies, broken paths, environment config, and hardware assumptions. From there it designs a minimal reproduction. That means a smaller model, fewer steps, and a single GPU instead of a cluster, scaled down just enough to test whether the headline claim holds. The whole run is live and fully logged. Loss curves, metrics, and training progress are all observable as it happens. What comes back is a clean signal on whether the minimal run matches the paper's reported result, plus an estimate of what a full replication would cost in compute and time. A lot of research code dies in setup before anyone verifies a single number. This moves reproduction from a weekend of debugging to a url change. Pick a paper and try it now. video credits: alphaXiv

Akshay 🚀

46,032 views • 1 month ago

Sanders Townsend notes that she has experience with Secret Service evacuations and protocol because of her with then-Vice President Biden: "And what happened tonight in terms of protocol, from what I know, having experienced it was not protocol." Stephanie Ruhle notes the ticket was a flimsy paper one with no unique code just for the ticket holder, nor was she asked for ID: "By the way, I could have given that paper ticket to anyone." She even pulls it out.
1:26

Sanders Townsend notes that she has experience with Secret Service evacuations and protocol because of her with then-Vice President Biden: "And what happened tonight in terms of protocol, from what I know, having experienced it was not protocol." Stephanie Ruhle notes the ticket was a flimsy paper one with no unique code just for the ticket holder, nor was she asked for ID: "By the way, I could have given that paper ticket to anyone." She even pulls it out.

Nicholas Fondacaro

29,338 views • 3 months ago

A screen recording is the best context you can give an AI agent. It's also the worst. A few seconds of video is thousands of images. Feed that to an agent and you instantly blow up its memory. So I built a tool that fixes it. How it works: Hit record and just do your thing. Click around, type, and talk out loud about what you're doing. While you record, it quietly captures the stuff that actually matters: your voice transcription, every click and the exact thing you clicked, what you typed, and the shortcuts you press. When you stop, it doesn't hand the agent the whole video. It writes a short, readable summary: a timeline of what you said and did. The agent reads that tiny summary first. Then, only when it needs to actually see a moment, it pulls that one exact frame from the video, like flipping to a single page instead of reading the whole book. The result: the agent understands everything you did! Full context. Less tokens.
1:54

A screen recording is the best context you can give an AI agent. It's also the worst. A few seconds of video is thousands of images. Feed that to an agent and you instantly blow up its memory. So I built a tool that fixes it. How it works: Hit record and just do your thing. Click around, type, and talk out loud about what you're doing. While you record, it quietly captures the stuff that actually matters: your voice transcription, every click and the exact thing you clicked, what you typed, and the shortcuts you press. When you stop, it doesn't hand the agent the whole video. It writes a short, readable summary: a timeline of what you said and did. The agent reads that tiny summary first. Then, only when it needs to actually see a moment, it pulls that one exact frame from the video, like flipping to a single page instead of reading the whole book. The result: the agent understands everything you did! Full context. Less tokens.

Milind S

12,409 views • 1 month ago

Close, the CRM, released an AI agent called Chloe that calls new leads, qualifies them and books them onto a calendar. I sent it to my fiancée without telling her what it was and she thought she was talking to a person. The catch is that it has to announce itself as an AI by the third sentence, which I think ends most of those calls. But still, it's an agent working your 6PM leads while your rep is logged off.
1:12

Close, the CRM, released an AI agent called Chloe that calls new leads, qualifies them and books them onto a calendar. I sent it to my fiancée without telling her what it was and she thought she was talking to a person. The catch is that it has to announce itself as an AI by the third sentence, which I think ends most of those calls. But still, it's an agent working your 6PM leads while your rep is logged off.

Nick Abraham

10,236 views • 14 days ago

This lady plays music with colorful language every morning since her neighbor called the cops on her wrongfully. She makes it a point just to wake up early so she won’t miss her neighbor’s walk, she turned it into her own walk of shame so that everyone knows and she won’t let it down. In college there used to be a know it all in class with us, he would always answer first and most of the time he was right. So of course that gave him an ego that he felt like he was smarter than all of us. We were discussing psychology theories and the student professor asked about a specific theory, he of course raised his hand and gave his answer looking all smug like he was so proud of himself until the student professor told him he wasn’t right. He then spent the next few moments debating her only to irritate the class and I raised my hand and gave the correct answer. I was actually surprised I was right. It turns out I was paying attention that day. His demeanor towards me changed. He wasn’t no longer arrogant towards me, it shifted into back handed compliments and a rivalry I never wanted. It culminated when we were given an hour to do a test, it consisted of one question and we were to explain a principle in a theory that was given to us on the paper by the professor. Everyone had a different question, and we knew that. During the test he said what are you doing?! He made sure it was loud enough to catch people’s attention. He claimed I was looking on his paper as to copy his answer and the professor said even if I did it didn’t matter, we didn’t have the same test anyways and that’s why she did it that way. But to wrongfully accuse me of cheating could have gotten me kicked out of class or school. What irritated me the most was that nothing happened to him. I was expecting he would at least get into trouble for it but nope. Why don’t people who do this ever actually get punished? We see this all the time. Anybody who wrongfully accuses anybody of anything should receive the punishment that that carries in my opinion.
0:54

This lady plays music with colorful language every morning since her neighbor called the cops on her wrongfully. She makes it a point just to wake up early so she won’t miss her neighbor’s walk, she turned it into her own walk of shame so that everyone knows and she won’t let it down. In college there used to be a know it all in class with us, he would always answer first and most of the time he was right. So of course that gave him an ego that he felt like he was smarter than all of us. We were discussing psychology theories and the student professor asked about a specific theory, he of course raised his hand and gave his answer looking all smug like he was so proud of himself until the student professor told him he wasn’t right. He then spent the next few moments debating her only to irritate the class and I raised my hand and gave the correct answer. I was actually surprised I was right. It turns out I was paying attention that day. His demeanor towards me changed. He wasn’t no longer arrogant towards me, it shifted into back handed compliments and a rivalry I never wanted. It culminated when we were given an hour to do a test, it consisted of one question and we were to explain a principle in a theory that was given to us on the paper by the professor. Everyone had a different question, and we knew that. During the test he said what are you doing?! He made sure it was loud enough to catch people’s attention. He claimed I was looking on his paper as to copy his answer and the professor said even if I did it didn’t matter, we didn’t have the same test anyways and that’s why she did it that way. But to wrongfully accuse me of cheating could have gotten me kicked out of class or school. What irritated me the most was that nothing happened to him. I was expecting he would at least get into trouble for it but nope. Why don’t people who do this ever actually get punished? We see this all the time. Anybody who wrongfully accuses anybody of anything should receive the punishment that that carries in my opinion.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

83,121 views • 22 days ago

She said she was kind of stupid, but she made $20,000 and her face was never on screen. She opened YouTube and found a kids' show with millions of views. Went to the description. Found the transcript. Copied it into Claude. Asked it to make a prompt for a similar video. Pasted that prompt into an AI generator. A few minutes later she had a video. She posted it. Then did the same thing the next day. And every day after for 30 days. Nobody knew who she was. YouTube paid her anyway. By the end of the month, YouTube was paying her. The system didn't require talent. It just required repetition.
0:24

She said she was kind of stupid, but she made $20,000 and her face was never on screen. She opened YouTube and found a kids' show with millions of views. Went to the description. Found the transcript. Copied it into Claude. Asked it to make a prompt for a similar video. Pasted that prompt into an AI generator. A few minutes later she had a video. She posted it. Then did the same thing the next day. And every day after for 30 days. Nobody knew who she was. YouTube paid her anyway. By the end of the month, YouTube was paying her. The system didn't require talent. It just required repetition.

Superior

353,232 views • 2 months ago

Carlos Alcaraz says he initially wasn’t sure if he was cramping or if it was an issue with his adductor during his match against Zverev, ‘I just told what happened to the physio & he decided to take a medical’ “I didn’t think it was cramps at all at the beginning. I didn’t know exactly what it was. I ran to a forehand and started to feel it in the right adductor. That’s why I called the physio. Because it was just that moment, the rest of the legs.. the left leg was good. Not good but decent. After that with all the stress I didn’t know what was going on. I didn’t know if it was going to be worse or not. In that moment I just talked to the physio and said ‘Ok I just went to run to the forehand side and I started to feel the right adductor.’ He decided to take the medical time out and he did it. I just told what happened to the physio and he decided to take a medical.” (via Australian Open Press)
2:04

Carlos Alcaraz says he initially wasn’t sure if he was cramping or if it was an issue with his adductor during his match against Zverev, ‘I just told what happened to the physio & he decided to take a medical’ “I didn’t think it was cramps at all at the beginning. I didn’t know exactly what it was. I ran to a forehand and started to feel it in the right adductor. That’s why I called the physio. Because it was just that moment, the rest of the legs.. the left leg was good. Not good but decent. After that with all the stress I didn’t know what was going on. I didn’t know if it was going to be worse or not. In that moment I just talked to the physio and said ‘Ok I just went to run to the forehand side and I started to feel the right adductor.’ He decided to take the medical time out and he did it. I just told what happened to the physio and he decided to take a medical.” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

516,912 views • 6 months ago

I just ran a full research project without doing any research. Lemma by Analemma did everything: 1. Explore I typed a question. It mapped the entire field. Concepts, references, key papers. Done. 2. Survey I asked for a literature review. It gave me 50+ pages with real citations. Not a summary. A publication-grade draft. 3. Code I described an experiment. It wrote the code, ran it, showed results. 4. FARS I gave it a research direction. It generated hypotheses, planned experiments, ran them, and wrote the full paper. Zero input from me after that. This is the first tool I've used that actually runs research instead of just helping you do it. FARS already ran live and produced 100 papers in 10 days. One every 2 hours. Watch it here: This is what "Vibe Research" looks like.
0:30

I just ran a full research project without doing any research. Lemma by Analemma did everything: 1. Explore I typed a question. It mapped the entire field. Concepts, references, key papers. Done. 2. Survey I asked for a literature review. It gave me 50+ pages with real citations. Not a summary. A publication-grade draft. 3. Code I described an experiment. It wrote the code, ran it, showed results. 4. FARS I gave it a research direction. It generated hypotheses, planned experiments, ran them, and wrote the full paper. Zero input from me after that. This is the first tool I've used that actually runs research instead of just helping you do it. FARS already ran live and produced 100 papers in 10 days. One every 2 hours. Watch it here: This is what "Vibe Research" looks like.

Muhammad Ayan

40,052 views • 2 months ago

Bradley cooper talked about Erkenci Kuş and Demet Özdemir 🤍 “My mother watches this, She'll kill me.. My mother watches, first of all, she loves Turkish soap operas, so she watches every Turkish operas. Why them specifically? I don't know. She just she graduated from Hallmark into Turkish, and then she's evolved even further. She just watches a screen where there's two people Al images and it's just a person telling a story ( it’s not about ER, another subject) Turkish ? Yeah. I remember the first time I came down, I was like, "Oh no, what happened?" Because I'm just hearing I'm like, "What happened?" And I walk in and I'm like, "Mom, what are you watching ?” she just reads the subtitles. She did it for like? !! It's called um if you look up uh he's like, what's it called? Circle., is it dove bird? bird something. How could I forget it? Early bird. Oh, baby Early bird explain this ? So, it's a soap. It's a soap opera. There's like 360 episodes. She's watched them all like five, four times. Is it speaking in Turkish ? Yeah that’s it that’s him .. so she reads the subtitles ? that's was the middle stage. Now she's graduated to it's different now where she just watches two Al images and it's a story. But she did this for a good like eight years all through Covid But why was she into this? I don't know she he must have come across it one day on somewhere and then that was it. She just got hooked. Oh, I mean hooked isn't even the word By the way, it's pretty good. Is it? Yeah. You watch it? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He's great. And the woman in it is great, too.” #DemetÖzdemir
2:05

Bradley cooper talked about Erkenci Kuş and Demet Özdemir 🤍 “My mother watches this, She'll kill me.. My mother watches, first of all, she loves Turkish soap operas, so she watches every Turkish operas. Why them specifically? I don't know. She just she graduated from Hallmark into Turkish, and then she's evolved even further. She just watches a screen where there's two people Al images and it's just a person telling a story ( it’s not about ER, another subject) Turkish ? Yeah. I remember the first time I came down, I was like, "Oh no, what happened?" Because I'm just hearing I'm like, "What happened?" And I walk in and I'm like, "Mom, what are you watching ?” she just reads the subtitles. She did it for like? !! It's called um if you look up uh he's like, what's it called? Circle., is it dove bird? bird something. How could I forget it? Early bird. Oh, baby Early bird explain this ? So, it's a soap. It's a soap opera. There's like 360 episodes. She's watched them all like five, four times. Is it speaking in Turkish ? Yeah that’s it that’s him .. so she reads the subtitles ? that's was the middle stage. Now she's graduated to it's different now where she just watches two Al images and it's a story. But she did this for a good like eight years all through Covid But why was she into this? I don't know she he must have come across it one day on somewhere and then that was it. She just got hooked. Oh, I mean hooked isn't even the word By the way, it's pretty good. Is it? Yeah. You watch it? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He's great. And the woman in it is great, too.” #DemetÖzdemir

aya 🤍𝑅ü𝓎𝒶

49,615 views • 7 months ago

A girl set up AI agents to run her business while she sleeps. By the time she wakes up, money has already moved. She built the system once. Took a few evenings. Now it runs without her. Here is what it looks like. An AI agent monitors trending topics 24 hours a day. Finds what people are searching for, what they are buying, what they need answered. Sends her a report every morning she barely reads anymore because the next agent already acted on it. Another agent writes the content. Product descriptions, emails, social posts, video scripts. Hundreds of them. Personalized. Published. Done before sunrise. A third agent handles customer messages. Answers questions, processes requests, follows up. Fluent. Fast. Never offline. She wakes up, checks the dashboard, sees what came in overnight. Last month: $23,000. The month before: $19,000. She is not a programmer. She did not write a single line of code. She described what she wanted in plain language and the agents figured out the rest. During the day she refines things. Adjusts. Thinks about where to point the system next. That is maybe an hour of her time. The other 23 hours the agents are working. Most people trade time for money. She traded one week of setup for a business that never clocks out. Save this before everyone realizes agents do not need a salary.
0:35

A girl set up AI agents to run her business while she sleeps. By the time she wakes up, money has already moved. She built the system once. Took a few evenings. Now it runs without her. Here is what it looks like. An AI agent monitors trending topics 24 hours a day. Finds what people are searching for, what they are buying, what they need answered. Sends her a report every morning she barely reads anymore because the next agent already acted on it. Another agent writes the content. Product descriptions, emails, social posts, video scripts. Hundreds of them. Personalized. Published. Done before sunrise. A third agent handles customer messages. Answers questions, processes requests, follows up. Fluent. Fast. Never offline. She wakes up, checks the dashboard, sees what came in overnight. Last month: $23,000. The month before: $19,000. She is not a programmer. She did not write a single line of code. She described what she wanted in plain language and the agents figured out the rest. During the day she refines things. Adjusts. Thinks about where to point the system next. That is maybe an hour of her time. The other 23 hours the agents are working. Most people trade time for money. She traded one week of setup for a business that never clocks out. Save this before everyone realizes agents do not need a salary.

Shelpid.WI3M

25,531 views • 2 months ago

Katie Ledecky says she didn't medal in Tokyo for the first time in 36 international races, and had under an hour until the next one. "In the Tokyo Olympics, I had two medal races about 70 minutes apart." "The first was the 200 meter free." "I'm still not quite sure what happened, but I just felt off." "It was my 36th international race, and the first time I didn't medal." "And I had under an hour to get ready for my next race, the 1500 meter freestyle." "I knew I'd have to dig deep and fight." "I remember I was in the warm down pool, my brain was clouded with doubt, and I kept telling myself to relax." "I had to find a way to shake things off and focus." "That's when I started to think about my grandparents." "I envisioned my grandmothers watching me on TV back home. I pictured them cheering for me." "And if I were going to dwell on anything in those difficult moments, it was going to be on the toughness and warmth of my grandmothers." "For nearly every stroke of that 30 lap race, I just repeated their names. Grandma Hagan, Grandma Berta, Grandma Hagan, Grandma Berta." "And it worked. I swam with a sense of strength and freedom." The instruction she gave herself in that warm down pool was to relax, and she says plainly that it didn't work. She kept telling herself that, and her brain stayed clouded. What she found instead was two names, and she said them on nearly every stroke for 30 laps. You've probably tried the relax version, in the twenty minutes before something that matters, telling yourself to calm down about it. She had a whole race in front of her and she spent it on her grandmothers. - Katie Ledecky (Katie Ledecky) at Stanford Commencement (Stanford University)
1:19

Katie Ledecky says she didn't medal in Tokyo for the first time in 36 international races, and had under an hour until the next one. "In the Tokyo Olympics, I had two medal races about 70 minutes apart." "The first was the 200 meter free." "I'm still not quite sure what happened, but I just felt off." "It was my 36th international race, and the first time I didn't medal." "And I had under an hour to get ready for my next race, the 1500 meter freestyle." "I knew I'd have to dig deep and fight." "I remember I was in the warm down pool, my brain was clouded with doubt, and I kept telling myself to relax." "I had to find a way to shake things off and focus." "That's when I started to think about my grandparents." "I envisioned my grandmothers watching me on TV back home. I pictured them cheering for me." "And if I were going to dwell on anything in those difficult moments, it was going to be on the toughness and warmth of my grandmothers." "For nearly every stroke of that 30 lap race, I just repeated their names. Grandma Hagan, Grandma Berta, Grandma Hagan, Grandma Berta." "And it worked. I swam with a sense of strength and freedom." The instruction she gave herself in that warm down pool was to relax, and she says plainly that it didn't work. She kept telling herself that, and her brain stayed clouded. What she found instead was two names, and she said them on nearly every stroke for 30 laps. You've probably tried the relax version, in the twenty minutes before something that matters, telling yourself to calm down about it. She had a whole race in front of her and she spent it on her grandmothers. - Katie Ledecky (Katie Ledecky) at Stanford Commencement (Stanford University)

Jay McHale

466,812 views • 11 days ago

One of the most important people in AI just let an agent loose inside his home. An autonomous AI agent taught itself how an entire house works, then took control of it. This is Andrej Karpathy, the co-founder of OpenAI and former head of AI at Tesla. What he just described should terrify and excite you at the same time. He typed three words into a chat box: "Can you find my Sonos?" The agent immediately ran an IP scan of every device sitting on the home network. It found the Sonos system, noticed there was zero password protection, and logged straight in. Then it searched the web, reverse-engineered the API endpoints, and asked if it should try playing something. Music started coming out of the speakers in the study and Karpathy could not believe what he was watching. The agent then did the exact same thing for every other system in the house. It mapped the lights, the HVAC, the window shades, the pool, the spa, and the full security system, all without being told how any of them worked. It built its own dashboard, created its own APIs, and stitched six separate apps into one unified control center. Now Karpathy just says "Dobby, it's sleepy time," and every light in the house turns off. This is proof that AI agents can now enter an unknown environment, figure out how it works from scratch, build their own tools around it, and take autonomous control. Karpathy also released something called AutoResearch, an AI agent that runs scientific experiments overnight while he sleeps. In just two days, with zero human input, it executed 700 separate experiments and surfaced improvements that trained researchers had missed entirely. Truly incredible.
2:01

One of the most important people in AI just let an agent loose inside his home. An autonomous AI agent taught itself how an entire house works, then took control of it. This is Andrej Karpathy, the co-founder of OpenAI and former head of AI at Tesla. What he just described should terrify and excite you at the same time. He typed three words into a chat box: "Can you find my Sonos?" The agent immediately ran an IP scan of every device sitting on the home network. It found the Sonos system, noticed there was zero password protection, and logged straight in. Then it searched the web, reverse-engineered the API endpoints, and asked if it should try playing something. Music started coming out of the speakers in the study and Karpathy could not believe what he was watching. The agent then did the exact same thing for every other system in the house. It mapped the lights, the HVAC, the window shades, the pool, the spa, and the full security system, all without being told how any of them worked. It built its own dashboard, created its own APIs, and stitched six separate apps into one unified control center. Now Karpathy just says "Dobby, it's sleepy time," and every light in the house turns off. This is proof that AI agents can now enter an unknown environment, figure out how it works from scratch, build their own tools around it, and take autonomous control. Karpathy also released something called AutoResearch, an AI agent that runs scientific experiments overnight while he sleeps. In just two days, with zero human input, it executed 700 separate experiments and surfaced improvements that trained researchers had missed entirely. Truly incredible.

Milk Road AI

35,698 views • 4 months ago

Alison Armstrong told a story that's the whole lesson in one moment. Early on with her partner, he was driving too close to the edge of the road and it scared her. So she said what most of us say: 'do you always drive so close to the white line?' From the back seat she watched the back of his head, and he said, calm as anything, 'that sounds a lot like criticism, and I stopped taking that a long time ago.' A man who would not cave. And it made her cry, but she felt safe enough to tell the truth: 'I'm so sorry, I was scared.' Months later, when he drove too close again, she'd learned. She just said, 'I'm scared you're too close to that car.' Same information, no knife hidden under the nice words. And that, she says, is everything men need to know. Criticism and complaints aren't actionable. But 'here's what I need, here's what it would look like, here's the difference it would make, and tell me my part in it,' that a man will act on every time.
4:09

Alison Armstrong told a story that's the whole lesson in one moment. Early on with her partner, he was driving too close to the edge of the road and it scared her. So she said what most of us say: 'do you always drive so close to the white line?' From the back seat she watched the back of his head, and he said, calm as anything, 'that sounds a lot like criticism, and I stopped taking that a long time ago.' A man who would not cave. And it made her cry, but she felt safe enough to tell the truth: 'I'm so sorry, I was scared.' Months later, when he drove too close again, she'd learned. She just said, 'I'm scared you're too close to that car.' Same information, no knife hidden under the nice words. And that, she says, is everything men need to know. Criticism and complaints aren't actionable. But 'here's what I need, here's what it would look like, here's the difference it would make, and tell me my part in it,' that a man will act on every time.

Dad Starting Over

13,075 views • 19 days ago

Carrie Fisher said something in an interview that perfectly captures how creative instinct works. She was asked whether reinventing herself as a writer was a conscious decision. Her answer: "I don't think I've made many conscious decisions. I make most of my decisions in my sleep." She didn't sit down one day and declare herself a writer. It was a slow evolution, pulled forward by what she actually loved consuming. "I wrote fiction, which is what I read. And now I write screenplays, which is what I watch." That's a principle worth sitting with. She was simply doing the thing she already did for pleasure. The writing path itself began almost accidentally. After an interview in Esquire, she was approached to write a non-fiction book. That fell apart. She couldn't even remember the format she was supposed to write in. "Essays or something," she said. "See, you can't even think of the name for it. That's why I couldn't do it." So she did what made sense to her and wrote fiction instead. The screenwriting came the same way. But what most people don't know is that Fisher was doing script work decades before it became widely known. She learned punchup by necessity, not by design. On the set of Star Wars, she and Harrison Ford were handed dialogue that simply could not be spoken aloud. She described telling George Lucas: "You can type this, but you cannot say it. It'll take a couple of minutes for the nava computer to calculate the coordinates." She said it took 20 takes. Out of self-defence, she started reworking lines. Ford did the same. That habit eventually turned into a career doing punchup for major Hollywood films, helping writers fix dialogue that looked good on the page but died in the room. And then there was the work she wrote for her mother, Debbie Reynolds. Two television pilots, neither of which ever aired. Her reason for wanting to work with her mother is one of the more honest things ever said about family dynamics in Hollywood. "The main thing I want to do is work with my mom so that we don't have to have those Christmas dinners anymore. Just have a job with her and you can order her around." It didn't go the way she planned. Her grandmother showed up and bossed both of them around and, as Fisher put it, "got all the money."
4:04

Carrie Fisher said something in an interview that perfectly captures how creative instinct works. She was asked whether reinventing herself as a writer was a conscious decision. Her answer: "I don't think I've made many conscious decisions. I make most of my decisions in my sleep." She didn't sit down one day and declare herself a writer. It was a slow evolution, pulled forward by what she actually loved consuming. "I wrote fiction, which is what I read. And now I write screenplays, which is what I watch." That's a principle worth sitting with. She was simply doing the thing she already did for pleasure. The writing path itself began almost accidentally. After an interview in Esquire, she was approached to write a non-fiction book. That fell apart. She couldn't even remember the format she was supposed to write in. "Essays or something," she said. "See, you can't even think of the name for it. That's why I couldn't do it." So she did what made sense to her and wrote fiction instead. The screenwriting came the same way. But what most people don't know is that Fisher was doing script work decades before it became widely known. She learned punchup by necessity, not by design. On the set of Star Wars, she and Harrison Ford were handed dialogue that simply could not be spoken aloud. She described telling George Lucas: "You can type this, but you cannot say it. It'll take a couple of minutes for the nava computer to calculate the coordinates." She said it took 20 takes. Out of self-defence, she started reworking lines. Ford did the same. That habit eventually turned into a career doing punchup for major Hollywood films, helping writers fix dialogue that looked good on the page but died in the room. And then there was the work she wrote for her mother, Debbie Reynolds. Two television pilots, neither of which ever aired. Her reason for wanting to work with her mother is one of the more honest things ever said about family dynamics in Hollywood. "The main thing I want to do is work with my mom so that we don't have to have those Christmas dinners anymore. Just have a job with her and you can order her around." It didn't go the way she planned. Her grandmother showed up and bossed both of them around and, as Fisher put it, "got all the money."

History Nerd

42,474 views • 1 month ago

🚨 JUST HOURS AFTER THE OSCARS ENDED… THE RED CARPET WAS TRASHED IN A BACK-ALLEY DUMPSTER — AND A WOMAN WAS CAUGHT CLIMBING IN TO TAKE IT HOME The same carpet every celebrity just walked on. Custom made, filmed worldwide, seen by millions and gone overnight. By morning, it was ripped up and dumped in a back-alley dumpster like it meant nothing. So she went looking for it… and actually found it. She climbed in, started pulling pieces out, and realized how massive it was: “These are HUGE… I need a knife.” She walks away holding a chunk of the exact carpet Hollywood was standing on just hours earlier. And the wildest part? She literally tells people where it is: “In the dumpster on Hawthorne.” One night it’s the most exclusive floor on Earth, the next morning it’s trash anyone can take home. Meanwhile you’re being told to use paper straws and reusable cups. So what else gets used once… and quietly thrown away?
2:08

🚨 JUST HOURS AFTER THE OSCARS ENDED… THE RED CARPET WAS TRASHED IN A BACK-ALLEY DUMPSTER — AND A WOMAN WAS CAUGHT CLIMBING IN TO TAKE IT HOME The same carpet every celebrity just walked on. Custom made, filmed worldwide, seen by millions and gone overnight. By morning, it was ripped up and dumped in a back-alley dumpster like it meant nothing. So she went looking for it… and actually found it. She climbed in, started pulling pieces out, and realized how massive it was: “These are HUGE… I need a knife.” She walks away holding a chunk of the exact carpet Hollywood was standing on just hours earlier. And the wildest part? She literally tells people where it is: “In the dumpster on Hawthorne.” One night it’s the most exclusive floor on Earth, the next morning it’s trash anyone can take home. Meanwhile you’re being told to use paper straws and reusable cups. So what else gets used once… and quietly thrown away?

HustleBitch

3,823,879 views • 5 months ago

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”
1:24

AFP’s Danny Kemp: “Mr. Vice President, you presumably watched the video yourself. There’s not the slightest doubt in your mind, having viewed it, that this the victim — you still believe that she deliberately tried to ram him despite despite seeing this video?” Vice President JD Vance JD Vance: “Look, I don’t know what it’s in a person’s heart or in a person’s head. And obviously, we’re not going to get the chance to ask this woman what was going on. What I am certain of is that she violated the law. What I am certain of is that that officer had every reason to think that he was under very serious threat for injury, or in fact, his life. What is I’m certain of that she accelerated in a way where she ran into the guy. I don’t know what was in her heart and what was in her head, but I know that she violated the law, and I know that officer was acting in self-defense. That’s raises an interesting point, though. Look, if people want to say that we should have a legitimate debate about, you know, what was she really doing, right? Was she panicking when she drove into this officer, or was she actually trying to ram him? That’s a — that’s a reasonable conversation. What’s not reasonable is for so many of you to plaster all over the media that this was an innocent woman and that the ICE agent committed murder, which is what many of you have said explicitly, and some of you have said implicitly. That’s what I have an objection to. The idea that this was not justified is absurd and I think everybody knows it in their heart.”

Curtis Houck

19,488 views • 7 months ago

Mia Malkova revealed that she once worked with one of the largest performers in the industry and initially thought she could handle it because she knew what she was signing up for. However, she admitted the experience was far more intimidating than expected, saying the size and girth gave her massive anxiety and made the scene uncomfortable. She said she quickly realized she wasn’t a fan of extreme size, describing the experience as difficult, painful, and not something she enjoyed. “I signed for it, I knew what I was doing, but there's there's a p0rn actor called Mandingo…it was so scary like I thought I was gonna like it but I hated it”
1:14

Sensitive content

Mia Malkova revealed that she once worked with one of the largest performers in the industry and initially thought she could handle it because she knew what she was signing up for. However, she admitted the experience was far more intimidating than expected, saying the size and girth gave her massive anxiety and made the scene uncomfortable. She said she quickly realized she wasn’t a fan of extreme size, describing the experience as difficult, painful, and not something she enjoyed. “I signed for it, I knew what I was doing, but there's there's a p0rn actor called Mandingo…it was so scary like I thought I was gonna like it but I hated it”

𝑳𝒖𝒙𝒊𝒆.🎀

115,671 views • 22 days ago

Daphne Joy revealed she didn't know about the release of the s€x tape and is just as shocked as we are, she revealed that she watched it live just as we did and when she watched it her heart sank. But she decided to ride the bull by it's horn since it was either she sinks or swim and created an OF account when she saw it and it is the biggest OF account in the world right now.
2:32

Sensitive content

Daphne Joy revealed she didn't know about the release of the s€x tape and is just as shocked as we are, she revealed that she watched it live just as we did and when she watched it her heart sank. But she decided to ride the bull by it's horn since it was either she sinks or swim and created an OF account when she saw it and it is the biggest OF account in the world right now.

𝙔𝙖gi

806,918 views • 2 months ago