Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A traffic stop turns on commands the driver cannot hear. He points to the hearing aids in both ears and signs with his hands up. The officer reads the signing as reaching, warns he will be tased, and deploys the taser. The clip says Anthony Lewis, a deaf interpreter,... show more

🔥⭐️Edwin⭐️🔥

78,994 subscribers

1,516,212 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

35 Comments

St. Aubin Genetics Official5 days ago

The dept didn’t pay $8.7 million the taxpayers paid that settlement. As soon as it comes out of the cops pensions this shit will stop over night.

RebelPsych5 days ago

That was quite a choice. Tasing him in the face while both hands are in sight and he's signing to you. Officer should be in prison, and the money should be paid personally by him

dante5 days ago

Cop should've been shot on the spot.

Jonathan Gennick5 days ago

The hands were up. It is obvious from the video that the man is rattled and is doing his best to comply. There is no need to recognize disability here. There is only the need to recognize the body language of confusion and fear. This man deserves every cent of his settlement.

Ben6 days ago

That guy was not a threat and did not look like he was reaching. Wtf

TheWaterIsFine5 days ago

The cop is a dipshit and should be cleaning dog cages. Cochlear implanted easy to recognize. I hope they fired him.

Big Dub U6 days ago

Lmao. Not in the face. Bro

🔥⭐️Edwin⭐️🔥6 days ago

that was rough

Lee W.5 days ago

Officers should be required to understand every single law they are sworn to uphold before being given a badge and a gun. I would be fired from my job if I was this incompetent.

I like fire6 days ago

Hands up and pointing at the hearing aids is about as clear as it gets. Good cops slow down when something doesn't add up, and taxpayers end up footing the $8.7m when they don't 🤦‍♂️

Scoob the Thinker ❤️‍🔥🕊5 days ago

By police department paid you mean tax payer money. End qualified immunity and make police carry their own liability insurance and allow us to sue them. How many trillions have been shelled out because of police abuse, that's actually our own money?

Terri5 days ago

As the mother of a deaf, adult son, this scenario is one of my greatest fears for him. When he got his first set of license plates I had them encoded to show law enforcement he is deaf. I did the same with his driver’s license.

me5 days ago

Normally I'm pro police, but I think the guy was visibly scared and deaf. Not saying the officer was wrong, but he should be trained to recognize these signs.

76DrofxeR5 days ago

That cop is a MORON and should NEVER be allowed to work so much as a convenience store security guard.

Midwestnet6 days ago

Looked fake, turns out it is.

Robert - Eno6 days ago

Obviously officers should be required to detect disabilities before tasing people 🤦🏼‍♂️ Nah police officers should just be able to walk up and deploy a taser on every special needs person they come across, sounds brilliant…

Kevin5 days ago

the fact he is in the car by himself and has his hands raised with no visible weapons he did deserve millions.

NorseGods5 days ago

Its AI. Why were there wires coming from, or going to the steering wheel? There is no way this happened. If it did, the cop needs to pay, and ride a desk answering phones.

Melanin Trader Chick5 days ago

Nothing about what he did deserved being tased even if an idiot police officer didn't understand. Treating traffic stops like a raid with probable cause is why a lot of these clowns don't deserve a badge.

A Good Pitch5 days ago

are police dumb or psychopathic? it's one or the other

Arsenia N. DeGracia ( Fe) 2nd Real X Account6 days ago

That’s a crime, why don’t the Police Department didn’t accommodate his disability? That’s against the bill called ADA! They need to hire Police interpreters and Mental Health Specialist Policemen! That is absolutely ridiculous and unnecessary. They didn’t properly accommodate, That’s against ADA ( Americans with Disabilities Act)

Photo of John Wayne6 days ago

A rare case of a bad cop.

JB 🇺🇸6 days ago

Crap! How did it even get to that point? If he pulled him over for speeding and escalated that quickly, wow!

Donald Hensley5 days ago

This is not real, and I assume it's AI. How was there a tazer string coming from the steering wheel? Also, there is no record of this case in news reporting's, court records, and police statements. This is propaganda to enforce the idea that police are bad and racists.

Leave Black people alone until 2028!5 days ago

AI SLOP! FAKE SHIT!

W.T.F.I.G.O!5 days ago

I will never succeed in believing that badge wearing, escalating tyrants truly care about civilians or protecting their rights, let alone upholding them. I understand why they are hired > authority are policy earnings, and the earnings from citizens out # criminals. I smell corruption.

JacobWi 🇺🇸6 days ago

You can taze me for 8.7 mil.

Red5 days ago

I think they need to bring IQ requirements to the police department. Anybody with any common sense will recognize that the situation was different than threatening.

I Am Jack's Complete Lack of Surprise5 days ago

This video is AI generated, and the story is fake.

Supreme Mii6 days ago

As an Officer you must be on your top game if you are really there to serve and protect. If you cant be bothered with that then you are doing the opposite. It’s not easy. Trust me I know. That’s why that occupation is something I realized I didn’t want.

vapelawguy5 days ago

Should those officers who use force face street justice?

Tracy TIPS6 days ago

Hearing aids or not? sometimes the traffic stop can be tricky🚦🚥

Vickey5 days ago

Occasionally the police make the wrong call. Considering they fear for their life every minute while on duty, and are attacked constantly both verbally and physically- it happens. Unfortunate, but stop vilifying the blue!

768 Nobody5 days ago

What makes it worse is that he looked terrified. That cop needs to be fired

Jake Tyers5 days ago

They don’t need to be able to spot a disability but they do need to be able to spot a threat. A man trembling with his hands up and informing you , the only way he can, he is compliant….he’s not a threat. Ray Charles could see he wasn’t a threat.

Related Videos

This truck driver is crocked. He does not even recognize his boss. Scary to think he was climbing in that truck getting ready to drive it. This wild bodycam footage out of the Palmetto Police Department in Florida shows the absolute dismantling of a commercial truck driver’s career in real-time. Officers were on the lot of Philadelphia-based Inox Cargo Inc., officers quickly realized the driver was in no condition to be behind the wheel of an 80,000-pound rig as he was exiting the rig. When asked point-blank by the officer if he was intoxicated, the driver didn't even try to hide it—just gave a casual, slurry "Yeah." But the real kicker happens when the officer points to a man standing right outside the cab. "You know this gentleman here?" The driver stares blankly, completely failing to recognize his own boss. The officer has to spell it out for him: "He owns the truck. That's your boss." With the truck still running, the officer warns him that he's looking at a commercial DUI and can say goodbye to his CDL. Hearing enough, the fed-up owner steps in to tell the officers that the driver is officially terminated on the spot. The boss demands the driver get his gear out immediately so they can search the cab for illegal substances, making it clear he’s not letting his business go down with the ship. Scary stuff right there as this man really could hurt someone if he was out on the road in this condition.

This truck driver is crocked. He does not even recognize his boss. Scary to think he was climbing in that truck getting ready to drive it. This wild bodycam footage out of the Palmetto Police Department in Florida shows the absolute dismantling of a commercial truck driver’s career in real-time. Officers were on the lot of Philadelphia-based Inox Cargo Inc., officers quickly realized the driver was in no condition to be behind the wheel of an 80,000-pound rig as he was exiting the rig. When asked point-blank by the officer if he was intoxicated, the driver didn't even try to hide it—just gave a casual, slurry "Yeah." But the real kicker happens when the officer points to a man standing right outside the cab. "You know this gentleman here?" The driver stares blankly, completely failing to recognize his own boss. The officer has to spell it out for him: "He owns the truck. That's your boss." With the truck still running, the officer warns him that he's looking at a commercial DUI and can say goodbye to his CDL. Hearing enough, the fed-up owner steps in to tell the officers that the driver is officially terminated on the spot. The boss demands the driver get his gear out immediately so they can search the cab for illegal substances, making it clear he’s not letting his business go down with the ship. Scary stuff right there as this man really could hurt someone if he was out on the road in this condition.

Giggling Gannon

471,655 views • 3 months ago

The government says that British Sign Language will be taught as a GCSE in England from September 2025. Parents, teachers and the deaf and hearing communities have taken part in a 12 week consultation to decide on the content of the qualification.

The government says that British Sign Language will be taught as a GCSE in England from September 2025. Parents, teachers and the deaf and hearing communities have taken part in a 12 week consultation to decide on the content of the qualification.

Good Morning Britain

89,912 views • 2 years ago

Video posted online shows a routine traffic stop that turned violent in Jacksonville, Florida, ending with a deputy beating the driver. The local sheriff's office says the video posted by the driver lacks context, prompting officials to release their own bodycam footage a day later. They say the use of force came after the driver repeatedly refused to follow officers' commands.

Video posted online shows a routine traffic stop that turned violent in Jacksonville, Florida, ending with a deputy beating the driver. The local sheriff's office says the video posted by the driver lacks context, prompting officials to release their own bodycam footage a day later. They say the use of force came after the driver repeatedly refused to follow officers' commands.

CBS Evening News with Tony Dokoupil

26,663 views • 1 year ago

Trey Devon Rosenthal was arrested around 2 a.m. on Sept. 13 at the Valero on MacArthur Drive in Alexandria, LA. APD responded after a clerk reported a large crowd trespassing on private property. The owner already had a no-trespassing letter on file. Officers used the patrol car loudspeaker and sirens to order everyone to leave or be arrested. Rosenthal was standing next to a running vehicle with the door open, talking to a woman and blocking the lot exit. Officers smelled alcohol and asked for ID. He refused. They told him he was under arrest and to put his hands behind his back at least 15 times and warned him about the taser multiple times. He did not comply. Officers deployed a taser. It was ineffective. Rosenthal pulled the wires, rushed toward officers, and threw a punch. Four officers then used tasers (two connected). He went to the ground. Chief Chad Gremillion said Rosenthal never lost consciousness, officers did not kick him or put knees on him, and they sat him up as soon as he was compliant. He was taken to the hospital, refused treatment, and blew a .120 BAC. Charges: aggravated resisting a police officer with force or violence, first-offense OWI, resisting an officer, and trespassing/remaining after forbidden. Bond was $7,000. APD released bodycam and said circulating cellphone videos left out the commands, the resistance, and the punch.

Trey Devon Rosenthal was arrested around 2 a.m. on Sept. 13 at the Valero on MacArthur Drive in Alexandria, LA. APD responded after a clerk reported a large crowd trespassing on private property. The owner already had a no-trespassing letter on file. Officers used the patrol car loudspeaker and sirens to order everyone to leave or be arrested. Rosenthal was standing next to a running vehicle with the door open, talking to a woman and blocking the lot exit. Officers smelled alcohol and asked for ID. He refused. They told him he was under arrest and to put his hands behind his back at least 15 times and warned him about the taser multiple times. He did not comply. Officers deployed a taser. It was ineffective. Rosenthal pulled the wires, rushed toward officers, and threw a punch. Four officers then used tasers (two connected). He went to the ground. Chief Chad Gremillion said Rosenthal never lost consciousness, officers did not kick him or put knees on him, and they sat him up as soon as he was compliant. He was taken to the hospital, refused treatment, and blew a .120 BAC. Charges: aggravated resisting a police officer with force or violence, first-offense OWI, resisting an officer, and trespassing/remaining after forbidden. Bond was $7,000. APD released bodycam and said circulating cellphone videos left out the commands, the resistance, and the punch.

LASHY BILLS

55,522 views • 19 days ago

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

A teen who was assaulted and slammed by a Warren police officer during booking has filed a $50 million lawsuit. The lawsuit was filed this week by Fieger Law. Matthew Rodriguez, 48, an officer with 14 years on the force, was charged Friday with assault and battery charges. Warren police announced Monday that he had been fired According to the lawsuit, the teen suffered physical and mental damage due to excessive force, and the city of Warren failed to properly train the officer. "Officer Matthew, with the specific intent to intimidate and/or harass Plaintiff, as a result of his race and/or ethnicity, caused physical contact with Plaintiff by striking him in the head and/or face with a fist and pulling him off the ground by his hair," the lawsuit reads. The lawsuit also says that the two other officers in the video failed to intervene and help the teen. “This is one of the most flagrant cases of police misconduct I’ve seen in my entire career as a trial attorney. The sheer violence and disregard for human life that these three officers showed is despicable and cannot be tolerated," said James Harrington of Fieger Law. The incident happened early this week at the Warren police department. The video shows the officer punching and grabbing the 19-year-old by his locs before slamming & launching him into his cell. Warren Police Commissioner Bill Dwyer says an investigation was launched after the two officers in the video stepped up and told a supervisor about the incident. One officer was telling Rodriguez "That's enough" multiple times in an attempt to make the officer stop, Dwyer said. At first, they did not know why the officer was attacking him. Within a week, the officer was arrested, charged, and put on unpaid administrative leave, said Dwyer. The officer in the video also was out of policy and was not wearing bodycam. The officer has a lengthy history of alleged accessive force. He currently has two pending lawsuits.

Music is Life

1,891,964 views • 1 year ago

Police catch up with a hit and run suspect waiting at McDonald's in the drive thru. From burgers to jail in the blink of an eye. Kent Police Department officers located a Cadillac Escalade tied to a recent hit-and-run. The driver, identified as Justin, was spotted ordering food at a McDonald's drive-thru. Officers instructed him to park the vehicle so they could conduct an investigation. While Justin initially complied and exited the SUV, the interaction quickly escalated. Justin repeatedly ignored commands to keep his hands out of his pockets and attempted to walk away from officers, claiming his son was inside the restaurant. After being informed he was under arrest for obstruction, Justin pulled away as an officer attempted to secure his arms. Despite multiple warnings that he would be tased, Justin continued to resist. Officers took him down to the pavement with some questionable strikes to gain compliance before successfully securing him in handcuffs. Following the arrest, Justin was asked if he would take a field sobriety test and he declined. He was informed that a warrant was going to be issued to take a blood sample. He was subsequently transported and booked into the Kent Jail. Justin faces multiple charges, including: Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Resisting Arrest Obstruction of a Law Enforcement Officer Following his booking, officers did get the search warrant to obtain a blood sample and determine his exact blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) at the time of the incident was above the legal limit.

Police catch up with a hit and run suspect waiting at McDonald's in the drive thru. From burgers to jail in the blink of an eye. Kent Police Department officers located a Cadillac Escalade tied to a recent hit-and-run. The driver, identified as Justin, was spotted ordering food at a McDonald's drive-thru. Officers instructed him to park the vehicle so they could conduct an investigation. While Justin initially complied and exited the SUV, the interaction quickly escalated. Justin repeatedly ignored commands to keep his hands out of his pockets and attempted to walk away from officers, claiming his son was inside the restaurant. After being informed he was under arrest for obstruction, Justin pulled away as an officer attempted to secure his arms. Despite multiple warnings that he would be tased, Justin continued to resist. Officers took him down to the pavement with some questionable strikes to gain compliance before successfully securing him in handcuffs. Following the arrest, Justin was asked if he would take a field sobriety test and he declined. He was informed that a warrant was going to be issued to take a blood sample. He was subsequently transported and booked into the Kent Jail. Justin faces multiple charges, including: Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Resisting Arrest Obstruction of a Law Enforcement Officer Following his booking, officers did get the search warrant to obtain a blood sample and determine his exact blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) at the time of the incident was above the legal limit.

Giggling Gannon

270,726 views • 3 months ago

Dude catches a taser in the rear for feeling like traffic stops so not apply to him. What starts as a routine traffic control operation outside the Columbus Zoo quickly turns into pure chaos when a driver in a white Jeep Wrangler decides the rules don't apply to him. After nearly striking law enforcement personnel directing traffic on State Route 750, the driver refuses to provide identification and insists he just needs to get to the zoo. Instead of pulling over as ordered, he hits the gas, tearing into the zoo’s main parking lot and triggering a chaotic foot pursuit. The officers caught up with the man on his way to the zoo entrance. The officer deployed a Taser to bring the non-compliant driver into custody. Instantly he went from non compliant to I love you guys. He was later booked on multiple charges, including felony Failure to Comply, OVI, and Inducing Panic.

Dude catches a taser in the rear for feeling like traffic stops so not apply to him. What starts as a routine traffic control operation outside the Columbus Zoo quickly turns into pure chaos when a driver in a white Jeep Wrangler decides the rules don't apply to him. After nearly striking law enforcement personnel directing traffic on State Route 750, the driver refuses to provide identification and insists he just needs to get to the zoo. Instead of pulling over as ordered, he hits the gas, tearing into the zoo’s main parking lot and triggering a chaotic foot pursuit. The officers caught up with the man on his way to the zoo entrance. The officer deployed a Taser to bring the non-compliant driver into custody. Instantly he went from non compliant to I love you guys. He was later booked on multiple charges, including felony Failure to Comply, OVI, and Inducing Panic.

Giggling Gannon

317,500 views • 2 months ago

He claimed FBI and NATO clearance during a routine traffic stop. He still spent 24 days in jail. What started as an alleged 72 MPH in a 55 MPH zone traffic stop quickly escalated after a Florida deputy says the driver became argumentative, claimed he was being followed by cars traveling 100 MPH, and repeatedly asserted that he had FBI clearance, NATO clearance, and dual Greek and U.S. citizenship. The driver initially presented an international driving permit before eventually producing his Florida driver's license. As the stop continued, he repeatedly questioned the deputy's authority, refused multiple commands to exit the rental SUV, and argued that officers needed a warrant. The encounter escalated into a brief struggle as the deputy attempted to detain him, leading to his arrest on a charge of Resisting an Officer Without Violence. Court records show the driver did not post his $1,000 bond and remained in jail for 24 days. He later entered a no contest plea to resisting an officer without violence, received credit for time served, and was ordered to pay $1,523 in court costs and fines.

He claimed FBI and NATO clearance during a routine traffic stop. He still spent 24 days in jail. What started as an alleged 72 MPH in a 55 MPH zone traffic stop quickly escalated after a Florida deputy says the driver became argumentative, claimed he was being followed by cars traveling 100 MPH, and repeatedly asserted that he had FBI clearance, NATO clearance, and dual Greek and U.S. citizenship. The driver initially presented an international driving permit before eventually producing his Florida driver's license. As the stop continued, he repeatedly questioned the deputy's authority, refused multiple commands to exit the rental SUV, and argued that officers needed a warrant. The encounter escalated into a brief struggle as the deputy attempted to detain him, leading to his arrest on a charge of Resisting an Officer Without Violence. Court records show the driver did not post his $1,000 bond and remained in jail for 24 days. He later entered a no contest plea to resisting an officer without violence, received credit for time served, and was ordered to pay $1,523 in court costs and fines.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

44,254 views • 2 months ago

🇬🇭 A man, initially served a court summons at his gate, refused to accept it, claiming he wasn’t at home. Later, he went after the court officers trying to return it to them, but they refused to take it and left the scene. In the recording, the officer warned that he was assaulting a court officer and could be picked up if he persisted. Lawyers on the timeline, can you clarify: Was he properly served, and does his location affect the validity of the service?

🇬🇭 A man, initially served a court summons at his gate, refused to accept it, claiming he wasn’t at home. Later, he went after the court officers trying to return it to them, but they refused to take it and left the scene. In the recording, the officer warned that he was assaulting a court officer and could be picked up if he persisted. Lawyers on the timeline, can you clarify: Was he properly served, and does his location affect the validity of the service?

CDR AFRICA

82,239 views • 8 months ago

A driver with a revoked license sped away from a traffic stop... then walked into the police station hours later and turned himself in. Police say the driver was clocked at 71 mph in a residential area before telling officers he was rushing to pick up his daughter from a homecoming event. During the stop, officers discovered his driving privileges had been revoked following a previous DUI and that he was required to use an ignition interlock device. Before officers could take him into custody, he suddenly drove off, leading to a pursuit. The vehicle was later found abandoned in a driveway with a 20-year-old woman inside. She told officers she didn't know where he had gone, while officers warned that intentionally misleading an investigation could carry legal consequences. Around 10:00 p.m., the driver voluntarily walked into the Wood Dale Police Department and admitted he panicked because he was driving outside the permitted hours of his Restricted Driving Permit. He was taken into custody and faced charges including speeding, driving while revoked, fleeing police, driving without insurance, and an ignition interlock violation. Do you think turning yourself in later should make a difference when it comes to sentencing?

A driver with a revoked license sped away from a traffic stop... then walked into the police station hours later and turned himself in. Police say the driver was clocked at 71 mph in a residential area before telling officers he was rushing to pick up his daughter from a homecoming event. During the stop, officers discovered his driving privileges had been revoked following a previous DUI and that he was required to use an ignition interlock device. Before officers could take him into custody, he suddenly drove off, leading to a pursuit. The vehicle was later found abandoned in a driveway with a 20-year-old woman inside. She told officers she didn't know where he had gone, while officers warned that intentionally misleading an investigation could carry legal consequences. Around 10:00 p.m., the driver voluntarily walked into the Wood Dale Police Department and admitted he panicked because he was driving outside the permitted hours of his Restricted Driving Permit. He was taken into custody and faced charges including speeding, driving while revoked, fleeing police, driving without insurance, and an ignition interlock violation. Do you think turning yourself in later should make a difference when it comes to sentencing?

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

26,707 views • 3 months ago

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Gannon

194,555 views • 3 months ago

Cop gets caught lying in real time. Tried moving the goal posts to justify his actions. We are in Midland Texas where Midland Police Department Officer Gill pulls the driver over under the absolute certainty that he saw the driver holding a phone in his hand. The driver immediately points to his dashboard, showing the phone is securely mounted. Left with nowhere to hide, Officer Gill is forced to admit his mistake on camera, stating, "I stand corrected." Under the Fourth Amendment, once the officer realizes the initial reason for the stop was invalid, the driver should be free to go. Instead, Officer Gill pivots immediately. Determined to salvage the stop and force the driver to identify, he suddenly claims the driver was speeding. When the driver presses him for proof—asking if he was clocked on radar or paced—Officer Gill admits he has no data. Instead, he claims he "visually estimated" that the truck was going exactly "10% over the speed limit." Mind you, the officer was parked at a complete standstill. The driver calls out the absurdity, pointing out that his speed was a cautious 16 mph in a 20/25 (30 was the confirmed limit) mph zone. Recognizing that the officer is fishing, the driver firmly refuses to hand over his driver's license. He rightly argues that because the original cause was a mistake and the secondary cause is completely fabricated, the officer lacks the reasonable articulable suspicion required by law to demand identification. He demands a supervisor. Sergeant Wilson (Badge #330) arrives on the scene and initially tries to back up his officer with a classic legal bluff: claiming that the traffic code allows police to pull anyone over just to check for a driver's license. The driver holds his ground, refusing to be intimidated. Realizing the driver knows the law, won't back down, and that Officer Gill’s shifting allegations wouldn't hold up for a second in court, Sgt. Wilson quickly de-escalates and tells the driver he is free to go—without ever getting his ID. Know your rights, keep your cool, and always roll recording. What do you think about how this driver handled the shifting goalposts? I will say that while the Midland police did a terrible job due to their lack of understanding of the law, I have seen these types of situations get much worse. Officers threatening arrest and pulling people from cars. These guys never once did any of that, so perhaps there is hope in Midland.

Cop gets caught lying in real time. Tried moving the goal posts to justify his actions. We are in Midland Texas where Midland Police Department Officer Gill pulls the driver over under the absolute certainty that he saw the driver holding a phone in his hand. The driver immediately points to his dashboard, showing the phone is securely mounted. Left with nowhere to hide, Officer Gill is forced to admit his mistake on camera, stating, "I stand corrected." Under the Fourth Amendment, once the officer realizes the initial reason for the stop was invalid, the driver should be free to go. Instead, Officer Gill pivots immediately. Determined to salvage the stop and force the driver to identify, he suddenly claims the driver was speeding. When the driver presses him for proof—asking if he was clocked on radar or paced—Officer Gill admits he has no data. Instead, he claims he "visually estimated" that the truck was going exactly "10% over the speed limit." Mind you, the officer was parked at a complete standstill. The driver calls out the absurdity, pointing out that his speed was a cautious 16 mph in a 20/25 (30 was the confirmed limit) mph zone. Recognizing that the officer is fishing, the driver firmly refuses to hand over his driver's license. He rightly argues that because the original cause was a mistake and the secondary cause is completely fabricated, the officer lacks the reasonable articulable suspicion required by law to demand identification. He demands a supervisor. Sergeant Wilson (Badge #330) arrives on the scene and initially tries to back up his officer with a classic legal bluff: claiming that the traffic code allows police to pull anyone over just to check for a driver's license. The driver holds his ground, refusing to be intimidated. Realizing the driver knows the law, won't back down, and that Officer Gill’s shifting allegations wouldn't hold up for a second in court, Sgt. Wilson quickly de-escalates and tells the driver he is free to go—without ever getting his ID. Know your rights, keep your cool, and always roll recording. What do you think about how this driver handled the shifting goalposts? I will say that while the Midland police did a terrible job due to their lack of understanding of the law, I have seen these types of situations get much worse. Officers threatening arrest and pulling people from cars. These guys never once did any of that, so perhaps there is hope in Midland.

Giggling Gannon

68,008 views • 3 months ago

A Long Island motorist has filed a lawsuit against the Suffolk County Police Department alleging he was beaten during a traffic stop in Medford. According to the lawsuit, after requesting a supervisor and refusing to exit his vehicle before speaking with one, an officer allegedly entered the car and punched him multiple times before officers forcibly removed and arrested him. The motorist claims he suffered a concussion, two black eyes, and other injuries. He was charged with traffic violations and resisting arrest. His attorney alleges the stop was racially motivated, while Suffolk County Police declined comment due to pending litigation.

A Long Island motorist has filed a lawsuit against the Suffolk County Police Department alleging he was beaten during a traffic stop in Medford. According to the lawsuit, after requesting a supervisor and refusing to exit his vehicle before speaking with one, an officer allegedly entered the car and punched him multiple times before officers forcibly removed and arrested him. The motorist claims he suffered a concussion, two black eyes, and other injuries. He was charged with traffic violations and resisting arrest. His attorney alleges the stop was racially motivated, while Suffolk County Police declined comment due to pending litigation.

TheSalGreco

216,140 views • 4 months ago

A distracted driver in El Paso narrowly avoided hitting a police officer during a traffic stop before crashing into the stopped vehicle, causing injuries to both the officer and the vehicle's driver. The incident resulted in the driver being cited for failing to control their speed and causing a collision.

A distracted driver in El Paso narrowly avoided hitting a police officer during a traffic stop before crashing into the stopped vehicle, causing injuries to both the officer and the vehicle's driver. The incident resulted in the driver being cited for failing to control their speed and causing a collision.

CBS News

184,800 views • 2 months ago

Midland cop caught fishing for violations just to get his hands on the driver's ID. The driver in this traffic stop out of Midland, Texas, put on a clinic with regards to knowing your rights when the "reasonable suspicion" starts to shift mid-conversation. Officer Gilpin initially pulls the driver over claiming he was holding his phone. The driver immediately points to the dashboard mount. The phone wasn’t in his hand; it was secured. Once the phone excuse fell through, the officer pivoted, claiming the driver was speeding. The driver’s response? He was doing 16 mph in a 25 mph zone. When challenged, Gilpin admitted he didn't use radar and wasn't pacing the vehicle—he was sitting still. He claimed he knew the driver was speeding based on "visual interpretation" alone. The driver demanded a supervisor which also does not seem know the law as he also wanted the ID just because he asked. Meanwhile Texas is not id on demand state. Because the initial reason for the stop was proven false and the second reason lacked any objective evidence, the driver refused to hand over his ID, citing his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable seizure. After this footage went viral, the Midland Police Department conducted an internal review. They concluded the officer’s conduct didn't meet department standards, and the City Manager later confirmed that the officer faced disciplinary action. When you know the law and have the footage to back it up, "visual interpretations" don't hold much weight in the face of the facts.

Midland cop caught fishing for violations just to get his hands on the driver's ID. The driver in this traffic stop out of Midland, Texas, put on a clinic with regards to knowing your rights when the "reasonable suspicion" starts to shift mid-conversation. Officer Gilpin initially pulls the driver over claiming he was holding his phone. The driver immediately points to the dashboard mount. The phone wasn’t in his hand; it was secured. Once the phone excuse fell through, the officer pivoted, claiming the driver was speeding. The driver’s response? He was doing 16 mph in a 25 mph zone. When challenged, Gilpin admitted he didn't use radar and wasn't pacing the vehicle—he was sitting still. He claimed he knew the driver was speeding based on "visual interpretation" alone. The driver demanded a supervisor which also does not seem know the law as he also wanted the ID just because he asked. Meanwhile Texas is not id on demand state. Because the initial reason for the stop was proven false and the second reason lacked any objective evidence, the driver refused to hand over his ID, citing his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable seizure. After this footage went viral, the Midland Police Department conducted an internal review. They concluded the officer’s conduct didn't meet department standards, and the City Manager later confirmed that the officer faced disciplinary action. When you know the law and have the footage to back it up, "visual interpretations" don't hold much weight in the face of the facts.

Giggling Gannon

366,461 views • 4 months ago

Officers arrest a man that is deaf and with a disability claiming he was resisting their verbal commands. The corruption runs deep with this one. Tyron McAlpin—a 34-year-old completely deaf man living with cerebral palsy—was walking home from a convenience store when he was suddenly intercepted by the Phoenix Police Department. Officers were responding to a 911 call regarding a minor disturbance across the street. A bystander mistakenly pointed out McAlpin, who had absolutely no involvement in the incident they were called out for. So yes they have the wrong man as the person they were called out for was white. Because McAlpin is deaf, he could not hear the verbal commands being shouted from the windows of the approaching police cruiser. Within seconds of arriving, officers exited the vehicle and immediately put hands on him. There was a struggle that ensued became McAlpin had no idea what was going on due to his condition. If the conduct from the officers was not bad enough during the struggle, the corruption continued. The subsequent police paperwork heavily distorted the reality of the encounter: Omission of Disabilities: In their official report, the responding officers completely omitted the fact that McAlpin was deaf and disabled. The "Stolen Phone" Falsehood: Officers claimed in their narrative that McAlpin was carrying a stolen phone. In reality, the phone belonged entirely to McAlpin. He had been using it immediately prior to the encounter to communicate via sign language on a video call with a woman that helps him. Survival Instinct vs. Aggression: The report claimed McAlpin took a "fighting stance." Defense attorneys emphasized that any physical struggle from McAlpin was a basic, defensive survival instinct from being suddenly and ambushed by strangers he could not hear. Instead of being recognized as a victim of a false accusation and the fact that he was the wrong guy, McAlpin was booked on felony charges of resisting arrest and aggravated assault on law enforcement. Unable to afford a $6,500 cash bail, McAlpin spent nearly a month in a Maricopa County jail cell. Because jail staff failed to provide an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter, he was kept in near-total isolation, unable to communicate with staff, his family, or his defense team. Following the public release of the bodycam footage, the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office officially dismissed all criminal charges against him. The internal police investigation resulted in mere 24-hour unpaid suspensions for the three officers involved, a move heavily criticized by civil rights advocates. Two tier justice strikes again! McAlpin's legal team filed a $3.5 million federal civil rights lawsuit against the City of Phoenix and the individual officers. The case remains active in federal court as both sides navigate discovery, highlighting the urgent need for systemic reform in how law enforcement interacts with disabled citizens. This case looks to continue in September of this year unless the city decides to settle. Keep in mind it's the tax payers that ultimately lose in a situation like this as tax money will be used to cover up for corrupt officers that basically attacked a disabled man.

Officers arrest a man that is deaf and with a disability claiming he was resisting their verbal commands. The corruption runs deep with this one. Tyron McAlpin—a 34-year-old completely deaf man living with cerebral palsy—was walking home from a convenience store when he was suddenly intercepted by the Phoenix Police Department. Officers were responding to a 911 call regarding a minor disturbance across the street. A bystander mistakenly pointed out McAlpin, who had absolutely no involvement in the incident they were called out for. So yes they have the wrong man as the person they were called out for was white. Because McAlpin is deaf, he could not hear the verbal commands being shouted from the windows of the approaching police cruiser. Within seconds of arriving, officers exited the vehicle and immediately put hands on him. There was a struggle that ensued became McAlpin had no idea what was going on due to his condition. If the conduct from the officers was not bad enough during the struggle, the corruption continued. The subsequent police paperwork heavily distorted the reality of the encounter: Omission of Disabilities: In their official report, the responding officers completely omitted the fact that McAlpin was deaf and disabled. The "Stolen Phone" Falsehood: Officers claimed in their narrative that McAlpin was carrying a stolen phone. In reality, the phone belonged entirely to McAlpin. He had been using it immediately prior to the encounter to communicate via sign language on a video call with a woman that helps him. Survival Instinct vs. Aggression: The report claimed McAlpin took a "fighting stance." Defense attorneys emphasized that any physical struggle from McAlpin was a basic, defensive survival instinct from being suddenly and ambushed by strangers he could not hear. Instead of being recognized as a victim of a false accusation and the fact that he was the wrong guy, McAlpin was booked on felony charges of resisting arrest and aggravated assault on law enforcement. Unable to afford a $6,500 cash bail, McAlpin spent nearly a month in a Maricopa County jail cell. Because jail staff failed to provide an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter, he was kept in near-total isolation, unable to communicate with staff, his family, or his defense team. Following the public release of the bodycam footage, the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office officially dismissed all criminal charges against him. The internal police investigation resulted in mere 24-hour unpaid suspensions for the three officers involved, a move heavily criticized by civil rights advocates. Two tier justice strikes again! McAlpin's legal team filed a $3.5 million federal civil rights lawsuit against the City of Phoenix and the individual officers. The case remains active in federal court as both sides navigate discovery, highlighting the urgent need for systemic reform in how law enforcement interacts with disabled citizens. This case looks to continue in September of this year unless the city decides to settle. Keep in mind it's the tax payers that ultimately lose in a situation like this as tax money will be used to cover up for corrupt officers that basically attacked a disabled man.

Giggling Gannon

138,970 views • 3 months ago

🚨DHS agents are now assaulting and arresting DEAF high school students… and then claiming they “failed to comply” with verbal commands they physically could not hear. In the video, protesters begin running. Multiple agents immediately tackle a high school student to the ground as people around them shout that he is deaf. The agents ignore them, and take him anyway. Later, DHS claimed Anthony Paredes was arrested for “failure to comply with directions”… directions that were given verbally, to a student who could not hear them. Read that again. They charged a deaf student for not following spoken commands. Paredes later signed on social media that DHS came outside, started chasing a woman, chaos broke out, and as people ran, agents chased him, assaulted him, and arrested him… despite him not being the target and despite being deaf. But it gets worse… After arresting him, they did not provide an interpreter. A clear violation of disability law. While detained, he tried to mouth that he needed to use the bathroom. Agents shrugged and ignored him, because he was deaf. This is brutality, an illegal arrest, excessive force, disability discrimination, and denial of basic human needs… all committed by federal agents who knew exactly what they were doing. And DHS still expect you to believe this is about “public safety.”

🚨DHS agents are now assaulting and arresting DEAF high school students… and then claiming they “failed to comply” with verbal commands they physically could not hear. In the video, protesters begin running. Multiple agents immediately tackle a high school student to the ground as people around them shout that he is deaf. The agents ignore them, and take him anyway. Later, DHS claimed Anthony Paredes was arrested for “failure to comply with directions”… directions that were given verbally, to a student who could not hear them. Read that again. They charged a deaf student for not following spoken commands. Paredes later signed on social media that DHS came outside, started chasing a woman, chaos broke out, and as people ran, agents chased him, assaulted him, and arrested him… despite him not being the target and despite being deaf. But it gets worse… After arresting him, they did not provide an interpreter. A clear violation of disability law. While detained, he tried to mouth that he needed to use the bathroom. Agents shrugged and ignored him, because he was deaf. This is brutality, an illegal arrest, excessive force, disability discrimination, and denial of basic human needs… all committed by federal agents who knew exactly what they were doing. And DHS still expect you to believe this is about “public safety.”

Jesus Freakin Congress

162,081 views • 8 months ago