Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
A well-crafted question here from Lane Harrison. "How do you explain the amendment that protects the province from lawsuits around injuries or deaths after you remove bike lanes to the families of those dead cyclists?" #onpoli #topoli
47,313 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

@lanesharrison I guess Ford is calling Deputy Fire Chief Jim Jessop a liar:

@lanesharrison It was a great question, truly unfortunate that @fordnation refuses to take any responsibility for his whims, or answer with honesty about anything.

@lanesharrison Very important question. @fordnation did not answer why they made amendments to stop the province from being sued when people are killed. Absolutely callous.

@lanesharrison Ford has not educated himself at all on this issue. 🙈

@lanesharrison Remind me what parallel route I can take across the Don Valley? Oh and I work at University and Dundas - and most days it’s a struggle to find an open spot to lock my bike. This isn’t about too many bikes - it’s too many cars polluting our city

@lindahaslett @lanesharrison Hope he tells them the truth - he knows his policies will cause deaths and he doesn’t care.

@lanesharrison Doug is an absolute asshat. Upwards failure.

@lanesharrison Everything Doug touches dies Here is the logic Doug finds sear belts uncomfortable Passes law removing them all Then passes law saying he can't be sued for all the ensuing deaths expected. That's how much sense. His comfort Your expense Your death Not his problem
@lanesharrison I have never seen University congested while I was on it, on my bike.

@lanesharrison This premier is knowingly trying to kill Toronto residents. There are no secondary routes - take a look at a map.
