Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

A whistleblower just released an internal USPS document stating that effective January 1, 2026, non-domiciled CDLs will no longer be accepted. This directly impacts trucking companies that rely on non-resident labor to keep costs down. One of the only major players still positioned to absorb this shift appears to... show more

Anttsinc

39,143 subscribers

245,714 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is insane New 2026 House Oversight Committee hearing reveals a whistleblower inside USPS says there are so many drivers with non-domiciled CDLs, it isn’t feasible to stop the practice Meaning there are so many illegal drivers the USPS does business with, it doesn’t make practical sense to not work with them “We've also got recording — who's the VP of Transportation Strategy at USPS. Who has said, quote, "We didn't understand the magnitude of how many people are using non-domiciled CDLs," suggesting that attempted to stop this practice but realized that there are too many drivers who are using these non-domiciled CDLs, so it wasn't, I guess, practicable to enforce that particular ruling” These drivers could be illegals, non-English speakers, immigrants drivers without proper paperwork I did some research and found that of these CDLs, about 200,000 of them were issued to ILLEGALS These are people who don’t speak English and shouldn’t be here, driving on our roads

This is insane New 2026 House Oversight Committee hearing reveals a whistleblower inside USPS says there are so many drivers with non-domiciled CDLs, it isn’t feasible to stop the practice Meaning there are so many illegal drivers the USPS does business with, it doesn’t make practical sense to not work with them “We've also got recording — who's the VP of Transportation Strategy at USPS. Who has said, quote, "We didn't understand the magnitude of how many people are using non-domiciled CDLs," suggesting that attempted to stop this practice but realized that there are too many drivers who are using these non-domiciled CDLs, so it wasn't, I guess, practicable to enforce that particular ruling” These drivers could be illegals, non-English speakers, immigrants drivers without proper paperwork I did some research and found that of these CDLs, about 200,000 of them were issued to ILLEGALS These are people who don’t speak English and shouldn’t be here, driving on our roads

Wall Street Apes

130,927 views • 1 month ago

The US Department of Transportation told Minnesota Governor Tim Walz he has 30 days to revoke all licenses issued to illegals or lose $30 MILLION in federal highway tunding 1/3 of all non-domiciled commercial CDLs in Minnesota were issued to illegal immigrants “Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration audit has found that one third of Minnesota's non I'm going to mispronounce this non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses were issued illegally. — So Minnesota officially has an ultimatum. They have 30 days to revoke those illegally issued licenses, or else we will pay a significant price in the form of $30 million of federal highway funding. Sean Duffy, the U.S. Transportation Secretary, said, quote, Minnesota failed to follow the law and is illegally doling out trucking licenses to unsafe, unqualified non-citizens, endangering American families on the road. That abuse stops now under the Trump administration. The audit found that the state of Minnesota issued licenses to drivers who were quote, prohibited from holding a non-domiciled commercial CDL.”

The US Department of Transportation told Minnesota Governor Tim Walz he has 30 days to revoke all licenses issued to illegals or lose $30 MILLION in federal highway tunding 1/3 of all non-domiciled commercial CDLs in Minnesota were issued to illegal immigrants “Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration audit has found that one third of Minnesota's non I'm going to mispronounce this non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses were issued illegally. — So Minnesota officially has an ultimatum. They have 30 days to revoke those illegally issued licenses, or else we will pay a significant price in the form of $30 million of federal highway funding. Sean Duffy, the U.S. Transportation Secretary, said, quote, Minnesota failed to follow the law and is illegally doling out trucking licenses to unsafe, unqualified non-citizens, endangering American families on the road. That abuse stops now under the Trump administration. The audit found that the state of Minnesota issued licenses to drivers who were quote, prohibited from holding a non-domiciled commercial CDL.”

Wall Street Apes

183,964 views • 7 months ago

🚨What Is a Non-Domiciled CDL and Why Do We Have So Many Illegal Alien Truck Drivers Suddenly? Fact! No one in Congress ever voted to allow the issuance of non-domiciled CDLs for non-citizens. So why can't Duffy just revoke them all? He can—and he should! The 1986 Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act required CDLs only for drivers domiciled in the issuing state—no foreign exception was included or approved. The entire illicit provision was later created by FHWA (now FMCSA) in their July 21, 1988, rulemaking (49 CFR § 383.23), using broad delegated authority. There was zero congressional oversight and zero votes—just an agency invention. Even then, they couldn't have foreseen how this might later be abused. This loophole lay mostly dormant until 2019, when the same agency (with ATA's support) issued guidance expanding the loophole! Then, in 2021, the Biden-Harris Trucking Action Plan opened the borders and fast-tracked hundreds of thousands of unvetted and unqualified truck drivers to take over our highways using the loophole created in 2019. That's right—this was done in secret and without the approval of the American people or the people we elected to represent us. This “loophole” lives in regulations, not law, so it can be restricted or eliminated without Congress. We need full revocation through executive order or additional agency action, not new statutes making it permanent. Say no to H.R. 5688—it's a Trojan horse. Time to shut this down and protect American truckers’ jobs and safety! REVOKE ALL NON-DOMICILED CDLs. DRAFT A LAW THAT BANS THEM. Secretary Sean Duffy

🚨What Is a Non-Domiciled CDL and Why Do We Have So Many Illegal Alien Truck Drivers Suddenly? Fact! No one in Congress ever voted to allow the issuance of non-domiciled CDLs for non-citizens. So why can't Duffy just revoke them all? He can—and he should! The 1986 Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act required CDLs only for drivers domiciled in the issuing state—no foreign exception was included or approved. The entire illicit provision was later created by FHWA (now FMCSA) in their July 21, 1988, rulemaking (49 CFR § 383.23), using broad delegated authority. There was zero congressional oversight and zero votes—just an agency invention. Even then, they couldn't have foreseen how this might later be abused. This loophole lay mostly dormant until 2019, when the same agency (with ATA's support) issued guidance expanding the loophole! Then, in 2021, the Biden-Harris Trucking Action Plan opened the borders and fast-tracked hundreds of thousands of unvetted and unqualified truck drivers to take over our highways using the loophole created in 2019. That's right—this was done in secret and without the approval of the American people or the people we elected to represent us. This “loophole” lives in regulations, not law, so it can be restricted or eliminated without Congress. We need full revocation through executive order or additional agency action, not new statutes making it permanent. Say no to H.R. 5688—it's a Trojan horse. Time to shut this down and protect American truckers’ jobs and safety! REVOKE ALL NON-DOMICILED CDLs. DRAFT A LAW THAT BANS THEM. Secretary Sean Duffy

American Truckers 🚛🦅

49,373 views • 6 months ago

SCOTUS RULING COULD LEAD TO AMERICAN TRUCKING COMPANY REVIVAL Chief Strategy Officer at Stevens Trucking & Member of American Truckers United, American Truckers United expresses his belief that the unanimous SCOTUS ruling that brokers can be held responsible for using dangerous haulers will lead to less dangerous drivers on the road, and a revival of small American trucking companies. Watch Fine Point with Chanel Rion OAN Weeknights 10pm ET / 7pm PT

SCOTUS RULING COULD LEAD TO AMERICAN TRUCKING COMPANY REVIVAL Chief Strategy Officer at Stevens Trucking & Member of American Truckers United, American Truckers United expresses his belief that the unanimous SCOTUS ruling that brokers can be held responsible for using dangerous haulers will lead to less dangerous drivers on the road, and a revival of small American trucking companies. Watch Fine Point with Chanel Rion OAN Weeknights 10pm ET / 7pm PT

One America News

41,307 views • 2 months ago

This speech from justindanhof on behalf of the Trump Administration is a declaration of war on DEI and ESG that everyone should listen to. It seems that the $14 trillion in pension investing that they control will no longer be propping up companies who embrace ESG and DEI. 🔥🔥

This speech from justindanhof on behalf of the Trump Administration is a declaration of war on DEI and ESG that everyone should listen to. It seems that the $14 trillion in pension investing that they control will no longer be propping up companies who embrace ESG and DEI. 🔥🔥

Robby Starbuck

22,969 views • 10 months ago

AOC: Trump has been saying the economy is booming, but it’s really only seven tech companies. They’re driving this growth in just one sector: AI. So the entire economic growth can be tracked down to seven companies and their AI expansion. Forty percent of economic growth is attributed to these companies alone, and 80% of stock gains this year came from AI companies. People are justifying these levels of investment because of the promises CEOs make — that there will be a return on that investment. For a company like OpenAI, their valuation is based on the expectation that they’re going to figure out how to make a profit off this, and they haven’t. Generating this increased human dependency that can be mined — people’s deepest fears, emotional content — can all be mined for this empty promise that we’re getting from these companies in the pursuit of profit. The reason I bring all of this up is that the exposure to this industry and this investment, I fear, has reached broad levels of the American economy. We’re talking about 40% of growth being attributed to that sector alone, and it has not turned a profit. We’re talking about a massive economic bubble. Depending on the exposure of that bubble, we could be facing 2008-style threats to economic stability.

AOC: Trump has been saying the economy is booming, but it’s really only seven tech companies. They’re driving this growth in just one sector: AI. So the entire economic growth can be tracked down to seven companies and their AI expansion. Forty percent of economic growth is attributed to these companies alone, and 80% of stock gains this year came from AI companies. People are justifying these levels of investment because of the promises CEOs make — that there will be a return on that investment. For a company like OpenAI, their valuation is based on the expectation that they’re going to figure out how to make a profit off this, and they haven’t. Generating this increased human dependency that can be mined — people’s deepest fears, emotional content — can all be mined for this empty promise that we’re getting from these companies in the pursuit of profit. The reason I bring all of this up is that the exposure to this industry and this investment, I fear, has reached broad levels of the American economy. We’re talking about 40% of growth being attributed to that sector alone, and it has not turned a profit. We’re talking about a massive economic bubble. Depending on the exposure of that bubble, we could be facing 2008-style threats to economic stability.

Acyn

1,057,791 views • 7 months ago

This is the proof that graphics means nothing if the game isn't fun to play. Today is your last chance to play Anthem for one last time. The online only game shuts down on 12 January, 2026 and no one will be able to play it there after.

This is the proof that graphics means nothing if the game isn't fun to play. Today is your last chance to play Anthem for one last time. The online only game shuts down on 12 January, 2026 and no one will be able to play it there after.

SpawnYaard 🎮

97,300 views • 6 months ago

Noida DM Megha Roopam is saying that if workers from outsourcing companies protest, then the licences of those companies will be suspended. How is this going to solve the problem of low wages for workers in Noida? This will only make these workers unemployed. From Gyanesh Kumar to his family members, all are incompetent?

Noida DM Megha Roopam is saying that if workers from outsourcing companies protest, then the licences of those companies will be suspended. How is this going to solve the problem of low wages for workers in Noida? This will only make these workers unemployed. From Gyanesh Kumar to his family members, all are incompetent?

Saral Patel

352,103 views • 3 months ago

Elon Musk explains artificial intelligence won’t just change how businesses are run, only companies that are entirely AI will be able to compete “One laptop with a spreadsheet can outperform a skyscraper of several hundred human computers, of people doing calculations. Now, if even a few cells in that spreadsheet were done manually, you would not be able to compete with a spreadsheet that was entirely a computer. What this means is that companies that are entirely AI will demolish companies that are not right. It won't be a contest.”

Elon Musk explains artificial intelligence won’t just change how businesses are run, only companies that are entirely AI will be able to compete “One laptop with a spreadsheet can outperform a skyscraper of several hundred human computers, of people doing calculations. Now, if even a few cells in that spreadsheet were done manually, you would not be able to compete with a spreadsheet that was entirely a computer. What this means is that companies that are entirely AI will demolish companies that are not right. It won't be a contest.”

Wall Street Apes

40,357 views • 2 months ago

Censorship | Pauline Hanson's Please Explain Imagine a future where Labor had the power to force social media companies to remove unapproved opinions and posts that made Anthony Albanese look foolish, anything that Labor deemed "misinformation." Imagine how many ways this power could be abused! For the few of you who are wondering, "what's the worst that can happen," you'll just have to tune into today's episode to find out! Help keep new episodes coming every Friday, support

Censorship | Pauline Hanson's Please Explain Imagine a future where Labor had the power to force social media companies to remove unapproved opinions and posts that made Anthony Albanese look foolish, anything that Labor deemed "misinformation." Imagine how many ways this power could be abused! For the few of you who are wondering, "what's the worst that can happen," you'll just have to tune into today's episode to find out! Help keep new episodes coming every Friday, support

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

605,362 views • 3 years ago

🌹💰💰💰 : Mark Carney brags he managed to get a set in stone agreement with Alberta on carbon credits, that will be enforced because it's not an MoU. Instead of paying $20 per carbon credit, companies will now be forced to pay $110. On top of that taxpayers will be paying for a carbon capture scheme, which no one can explain how it will make the weather better. On top of that companies pay an industrial carbon tax. On top of that taxpayers will be paying a fuel surcharge tax. Danielle Smith delivered a carbon market for her voters. To my knowledge no one wanted her to do it. What did she get in return?

🌹💰💰💰 : Mark Carney brags he managed to get a set in stone agreement with Alberta on carbon credits, that will be enforced because it's not an MoU. Instead of paying $20 per carbon credit, companies will now be forced to pay $110. On top of that taxpayers will be paying for a carbon capture scheme, which no one can explain how it will make the weather better. On top of that companies pay an industrial carbon tax. On top of that taxpayers will be paying a fuel surcharge tax. Danielle Smith delivered a carbon market for her voters. To my knowledge no one wanted her to do it. What did she get in return?

Bruce McGonigal

68,128 views • 1 month ago

This is HUGE ‼️ Woman who works with Section 8 is going over upcoming major changes. Starting with October 1, 2025 “there is a 2 year max time limit on this program for everyone that's able to work now” No more spending a lifetime on Section 8!! “There are major changes coming to Section 8 housing starting with October 1, 2025 that will affect millions of Americans — Instead of HUD running that voucher program national wide, they will send those funds to the state in the form of block grants which means that every state will decide how to spend those funds. But it's a smaller amount of funds so that means that fewer people will be able to get the assistance. One of the most controversial parts about this program is there is a 2 year max time limit on this program for everyone that's able to work now. There is a major contract to right now which the average family stays on this program for about six years even if they are able to work. A lot of the supporters of this build are pointing out that a lot of people are taking advantage of this program and sucking the resources that could be used for someone that actually needs them.”

This is HUGE ‼️ Woman who works with Section 8 is going over upcoming major changes. Starting with October 1, 2025 “there is a 2 year max time limit on this program for everyone that's able to work now” No more spending a lifetime on Section 8!! “There are major changes coming to Section 8 housing starting with October 1, 2025 that will affect millions of Americans — Instead of HUD running that voucher program national wide, they will send those funds to the state in the form of block grants which means that every state will decide how to spend those funds. But it's a smaller amount of funds so that means that fewer people will be able to get the assistance. One of the most controversial parts about this program is there is a 2 year max time limit on this program for everyone that's able to work now. There is a major contract to right now which the average family stays on this program for about six years even if they are able to work. A lot of the supporters of this build are pointing out that a lot of people are taking advantage of this program and sucking the resources that could be used for someone that actually needs them.”

Wall Street Apes

998,362 views • 11 months ago

The FMCSA (under DOT) in continuing an ongoing audit of IL SOS office related to the issuance of at least 10,000 non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses over the past few years. These are truck driver's licenses awarded to non residents--foreigners--including some here illegally. In 2024 and 2025, the state saw a huge jump in the number of non-domiciled CDL issued by IL SOS. In fact, an industry watchdog group obtained records via FOIA that showed roughly 40% of ALL CDLs issued by IL SOS in 2025 went to foreigners. FMCSA determined at least 20% of all non-domiciled CDLs issued by IL SOS were done so illegally. Applicants did not furnish federally required paperwork including unexpired passports and IL SOS issued CDLs for a longer period of time than the applicants' work authorization permitted. The audit also "uncovered evidence of systemic policy, procedural, and programming errors" in how the IL SOS handled non-domiciled CDL applications. Nonetheless, IL SOS is fighting FMCSA's findings, claiming that "every non-domiciled CDL applicant in Illinois presented validly immigration documents." IL SOS also refused to revoke/suspend the unlawfully issued CDLs officials identified in the FMCSA audit. So at the same time the feds are looking into whether hundreds, perhaps thousands, of non domiciled CDLs were illegally issued to foreigners in Illinois and a major trucking carrier in Illinois is under federal investigation for numerous issues--Chicago media says nothing.

The FMCSA (under DOT) in continuing an ongoing audit of IL SOS office related to the issuance of at least 10,000 non-domiciled commercial driver's licenses over the past few years. These are truck driver's licenses awarded to non residents--foreigners--including some here illegally. In 2024 and 2025, the state saw a huge jump in the number of non-domiciled CDL issued by IL SOS. In fact, an industry watchdog group obtained records via FOIA that showed roughly 40% of ALL CDLs issued by IL SOS in 2025 went to foreigners. FMCSA determined at least 20% of all non-domiciled CDLs issued by IL SOS were done so illegally. Applicants did not furnish federally required paperwork including unexpired passports and IL SOS issued CDLs for a longer period of time than the applicants' work authorization permitted. The audit also "uncovered evidence of systemic policy, procedural, and programming errors" in how the IL SOS handled non-domiciled CDL applications. Nonetheless, IL SOS is fighting FMCSA's findings, claiming that "every non-domiciled CDL applicant in Illinois presented validly immigration documents." IL SOS also refused to revoke/suspend the unlawfully issued CDLs officials identified in the FMCSA audit. So at the same time the feds are looking into whether hundreds, perhaps thousands, of non domiciled CDLs were illegally issued to foreigners in Illinois and a major trucking carrier in Illinois is under federal investigation for numerous issues--Chicago media says nothing.

Julie Kelly 🇺🇸

21,338 views • 3 months ago

This is hard to watch, I hope this gets the attention it deserves This woman is a “Transitions of Care Clinical Pharmacist, I discharge patients from a hospital” This grown woman breaks down and cries because health insurance companies keep denying cancer patients pain meds “How bad does somebody's freaking pain have to be before the insurance companies will cover this medication for these patients? Ridiculous. Who's holding these insurance companies liable for this?” Everyone should watch this video. When is enough enough with US Heath Insurance companies?

This is hard to watch, I hope this gets the attention it deserves This woman is a “Transitions of Care Clinical Pharmacist, I discharge patients from a hospital” This grown woman breaks down and cries because health insurance companies keep denying cancer patients pain meds “How bad does somebody's freaking pain have to be before the insurance companies will cover this medication for these patients? Ridiculous. Who's holding these insurance companies liable for this?” Everyone should watch this video. When is enough enough with US Heath Insurance companies?

Wall Street Apes

457,225 views • 1 year ago

Katherine Boyle says SpaceX’s legacy will be the thousands of companies that spawn from the school of Elon Musk: "What we've learned from the SpaceX story is that these kinds of companies can be built." "It is one of the most important companies in America. It's beloved by Americans across the country for what it's been able to achieve." "The legacy of SpaceX is going to be hundreds, if not thousands of companies—people who've gone to the school of Elon Musk, they've learned manufacturing and they've built companies, and built products in a way that they can take to new companies in manufacturing and defense, and drones and hypersonics—all of these other categories that SpaceX doesn't do." "We're incredibly excited about SpaceX. We're incredibly excited for what it's achieved for the American people and what it's going to lead to over the next 25 years." Katherine Boyle on FOX Business

Katherine Boyle says SpaceX’s legacy will be the thousands of companies that spawn from the school of Elon Musk: "What we've learned from the SpaceX story is that these kinds of companies can be built." "It is one of the most important companies in America. It's beloved by Americans across the country for what it's been able to achieve." "The legacy of SpaceX is going to be hundreds, if not thousands of companies—people who've gone to the school of Elon Musk, they've learned manufacturing and they've built companies, and built products in a way that they can take to new companies in manufacturing and defense, and drones and hypersonics—all of these other categories that SpaceX doesn't do." "We're incredibly excited about SpaceX. We're incredibly excited for what it's achieved for the American people and what it's going to lead to over the next 25 years." Katherine Boyle on FOX Business

a16z

658,860 views • 4 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: The US Supreme Court has ruled 9-0 that freight brokers can be held LIABLE if they negligently hire unsafe trucking companies — including those with ILLEGAL ALIEN and FOREIGN drivers who violate CDL rules and cause accidents LFG! Start cracking down on the companies 🔥 The opinion, delivered by Barrett, confirms that federal law does not shield these brokers from state negligence lawsuits. This will likely help force brokers into being MUCH more careful about which carriers they use, because they want to avoid lawsuits PURGE THE CDL SYSTEM and hold all trucking companies liable! Non-English foreigners all over the roads needs to end.

🚨 BREAKING: The US Supreme Court has ruled 9-0 that freight brokers can be held LIABLE if they negligently hire unsafe trucking companies — including those with ILLEGAL ALIEN and FOREIGN drivers who violate CDL rules and cause accidents LFG! Start cracking down on the companies 🔥 The opinion, delivered by Barrett, confirms that federal law does not shield these brokers from state negligence lawsuits. This will likely help force brokers into being MUCH more careful about which carriers they use, because they want to avoid lawsuits PURGE THE CDL SYSTEM and hold all trucking companies liable! Non-English foreigners all over the roads needs to end.

Eric Daugherty

3,248,932 views • 2 months ago

🚨 URGENT: If agrochemical companies have their way, they will be immune from ALL liability. Much like vaccine manufacturers have liability protections, agrochemical companies are on the hunt to dodge lawsuits for the harm their chemical products cause. With issues like non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, endocrine disruption, birth defects and nervous system damage linked back to these companies, Bayer and others are “hemorrhaging money.” Desperate to stop further lawsuits, they’re seeking immunity from all liability. “If this passes federally, that means all across the country no agrochemical company will be able to be sued if somebody gets cancer or loses a child or has nervous system damage from their chemicals.” Zen Honeycutt Watch the whole episode on CHDTV ⬇️

🚨 URGENT: If agrochemical companies have their way, they will be immune from ALL liability. Much like vaccine manufacturers have liability protections, agrochemical companies are on the hunt to dodge lawsuits for the harm their chemical products cause. With issues like non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, endocrine disruption, birth defects and nervous system damage linked back to these companies, Bayer and others are “hemorrhaging money.” Desperate to stop further lawsuits, they’re seeking immunity from all liability. “If this passes federally, that means all across the country no agrochemical company will be able to be sued if somebody gets cancer or loses a child or has nervous system damage from their chemicals.” Zen Honeycutt Watch the whole episode on CHDTV ⬇️

Children’s Health Defense

28,711 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸 SEC. RFK JR: INSURERS WILL END PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR MILLIONS OF AMERICANS BY 2026 RFK Jr. announced a sweeping agreement with major U.S. insurance companies to eliminate prior authorization requirements for most procedures starting January 2026, streamlining care for over 280 million Americans: “We convened the insurance companies, representing 280 million Americans, and got them to agree, most of them by January of 2026 to remove prior authorization for most of their procedures, for all the procedures we want them removed from. That means American patients at the point of care will be able to get an answer immediately. If your doctor says you need knee surgery, you will know before you leave that doctor’s office whether your insurance company will pay for it or not.” Source: HHS Rapid Response

🇺🇸 SEC. RFK JR: INSURERS WILL END PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR MILLIONS OF AMERICANS BY 2026 RFK Jr. announced a sweeping agreement with major U.S. insurance companies to eliminate prior authorization requirements for most procedures starting January 2026, streamlining care for over 280 million Americans: “We convened the insurance companies, representing 280 million Americans, and got them to agree, most of them by January of 2026 to remove prior authorization for most of their procedures, for all the procedures we want them removed from. That means American patients at the point of care will be able to get an answer immediately. If your doctor says you need knee surgery, you will know before you leave that doctor’s office whether your insurance company will pay for it or not.” Source: HHS Rapid Response

Mario Nawfal

291,634 views • 7 months ago

Jason Calacanis: The outcome of NYT v. OpenAI could change everything for content creators On E215, @jason discussed the downstream impacts from a huge recent legal decision in the AI space: "Thomson Reuters just won the first major US AI copyright case." "This has huge implications for AI companies here in the United States." "I think that there is a non-zero chance, it might be 5 or 10%, that OpenAI is going to lose the The New York Times lawsuit, and they're going to lose it hard." "I think The New York Times realizes this is their payday." " The settlement might be that these language models, especially the closed ones, are going to have to pay some percentage of their revenue to the content holders." " And this could make the content industry have a massive resurgence." " I think the New York Times will make more money from licenses from LLMs than they will make from advertising or subscriptions, eventually." " This will renew the model."

Jason Calacanis: The outcome of NYT v. OpenAI could change everything for content creators On E215, @jason discussed the downstream impacts from a huge recent legal decision in the AI space: "Thomson Reuters just won the first major US AI copyright case." "This has huge implications for AI companies here in the United States." "I think that there is a non-zero chance, it might be 5 or 10%, that OpenAI is going to lose the The New York Times lawsuit, and they're going to lose it hard." "I think The New York Times realizes this is their payday." " The settlement might be that these language models, especially the closed ones, are going to have to pay some percentage of their revenue to the content holders." " And this could make the content industry have a massive resurgence." " I think the New York Times will make more money from licenses from LLMs than they will make from advertising or subscriptions, eventually." " This will renew the model."

The All-In Podcast

69,778 views • 1 year ago