正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

A YouTube “Vimana mercury vortex” test spins liquid mercury with EM fields to probe ancient propulsion claims. Visually compelling vortices and oscillations appear but no thrust or lift…yet

Bluntly Put Philosopher (BPP)

30,902 subscribers

66,580 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Did you know that if a mercury-containing vaccine drops on the floor, “the HAZMAT people have to come and take that away”? Yet we inject it into 3-month-old babies. Vaccines may look like a clear liquid, but the process behind them is anything but clean. The process often starts with a diseased animal tissue—like monkey kidneys or even pus scraped from ulcers on cows, Dr. Suzanne Humphries explains. To keep those cells alive, manufacturers use a cocktail of animal blood, antibiotics, and additives like mercury. Why mercury? Because it helps kill off hidden microbes that might survive the process. But as Humphries points out, mercury is so toxic the only places it’s considered “safe” are in vaccines, dental fillings, and toxic waste sites. “Yet we’re okay to take a portion of that vial and inject it into a child, a three month old child. How does that work?” Dr. Humphries asked.

Did you know that if a mercury-containing vaccine drops on the floor, “the HAZMAT people have to come and take that away”? Yet we inject it into 3-month-old babies. Vaccines may look like a clear liquid, but the process behind them is anything but clean. The process often starts with a diseased animal tissue—like monkey kidneys or even pus scraped from ulcers on cows, Dr. Suzanne Humphries explains. To keep those cells alive, manufacturers use a cocktail of animal blood, antibiotics, and additives like mercury. Why mercury? Because it helps kill off hidden microbes that might survive the process. But as Humphries points out, mercury is so toxic the only places it’s considered “safe” are in vaccines, dental fillings, and toxic waste sites. “Yet we’re okay to take a portion of that vial and inject it into a child, a three month old child. How does that work?” Dr. Humphries asked.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,874,627 次观看 • 1 年前

Ancient Flying Machines in Hindu Myth Vimanas are mythical flying chariots or aerial vehicles described in ancient Hindu texts like the Mahabharata, Ramayana, and Vaimanika Shastra. They were said to be metallic, disc- or pyramid-shaped crafts capable of flight, levitation, and even interstellar travel. In the Ramayana, Ravana had a flying palace called the Pushpaka Vimana, which could travel at will described as glowing, humming, and self-propelled. The Vaimanika Shastra, a Sanskrit text allegedly channeled in the early 20th century, details engineering schematics, propulsion systems, and anti-gravity tech for Vimanas. Some Vimanas were said to use mercury vortex engines, solar power, or even ancient sound vibration to fly predating modern flight by thousands of years. Ancient depictions of Vimanas resemble modern UFOs, and the texts describe dogfights, weapons, and cloaking technology. The Mahabharata even includes descriptions of air battles and weapons that resemble nuclear blasts, radiation, and shockwaves. In short: Vimanas aren’t just fantasy they’re detailed accounts of ancient high technology that hint at a forgotten golden age of advanced civilizations in deep antiquity.

Ancient Flying Machines in Hindu Myth Vimanas are mythical flying chariots or aerial vehicles described in ancient Hindu texts like the Mahabharata, Ramayana, and Vaimanika Shastra. They were said to be metallic, disc- or pyramid-shaped crafts capable of flight, levitation, and even interstellar travel. In the Ramayana, Ravana had a flying palace called the Pushpaka Vimana, which could travel at will described as glowing, humming, and self-propelled. The Vaimanika Shastra, a Sanskrit text allegedly channeled in the early 20th century, details engineering schematics, propulsion systems, and anti-gravity tech for Vimanas. Some Vimanas were said to use mercury vortex engines, solar power, or even ancient sound vibration to fly predating modern flight by thousands of years. Ancient depictions of Vimanas resemble modern UFOs, and the texts describe dogfights, weapons, and cloaking technology. The Mahabharata even includes descriptions of air battles and weapons that resemble nuclear blasts, radiation, and shockwaves. In short: Vimanas aren’t just fantasy they’re detailed accounts of ancient high technology that hint at a forgotten golden age of advanced civilizations in deep antiquity.

Wisdom Walk

42,004 次观看 • 11 个月前

The Hidden Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines: A Deep Dive with Dr. Suzanne Humphries Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and vaccine safety advocate, exposes the unsettling truth about mercury in vaccines. Once widely used in MMR and flu vaccines as an antimicrobial, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) was added to kill microbes and ensure a "clean" final product. But at what cost? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin with no safe place in the human body. Dr. Humphries explains that vaccine production involves complex, often unsavory processes: growing viruses in animal-derived cells (from cow pus, monkey kidneys, or tumor cells) and using animal blood, antibiotics, and even mercury to keep cultures viable. The result? A product that might be free of deadly microbes but now contains mercury—a substance so toxic that if a mercury-containing vaccine vial breaks, hazmat teams are called in. Yet, this same substance is deemed "safe" to inject into infants as young as six months. The distinction between ethylmercury (used in vaccines) and methylmercury (found in fish) is often cited to downplay concerns. Ethylmercury supposedly leaves the body faster, but Dr. Humphries warns that all mercury is harmful. Once in the body, mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier—especially during inflammation—and deposit in critical areas like the brain and adrenal glands. Unlike fish, humans lack efficient mechanisms to excrete mercury without interventions like chelation. Even at low levels, this neurotoxin can wreak havoc. Dr. Humphries questions the logic: mercury is only "acceptable" in vaccines, dental fillings, or toxic landfills. If it’s too dangerous for the environment, why is it injected into children? She also highlights that aluminum, another vaccine ingredient, poses similar risks by crossing the blood-brain barrier. The science is clear: neurotoxins have no place in our bodies. It’s time to rethink vaccine safety. Why are we risking our children’s health with substances that require hazmat cleanup? Share this post to spark a conversation and demand transparency.

The Hidden Dangers of Mercury in Vaccines: A Deep Dive with Dr. Suzanne Humphries Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a physician and vaccine safety advocate, exposes the unsettling truth about mercury in vaccines. Once widely used in MMR and flu vaccines as an antimicrobial, mercury (in the form of thimerosal) was added to kill microbes and ensure a "clean" final product. But at what cost? Mercury is a potent neurotoxin with no safe place in the human body. Dr. Humphries explains that vaccine production involves complex, often unsavory processes: growing viruses in animal-derived cells (from cow pus, monkey kidneys, or tumor cells) and using animal blood, antibiotics, and even mercury to keep cultures viable. The result? A product that might be free of deadly microbes but now contains mercury—a substance so toxic that if a mercury-containing vaccine vial breaks, hazmat teams are called in. Yet, this same substance is deemed "safe" to inject into infants as young as six months. The distinction between ethylmercury (used in vaccines) and methylmercury (found in fish) is often cited to downplay concerns. Ethylmercury supposedly leaves the body faster, but Dr. Humphries warns that all mercury is harmful. Once in the body, mercury can cross the blood-brain barrier—especially during inflammation—and deposit in critical areas like the brain and adrenal glands. Unlike fish, humans lack efficient mechanisms to excrete mercury without interventions like chelation. Even at low levels, this neurotoxin can wreak havoc. Dr. Humphries questions the logic: mercury is only "acceptable" in vaccines, dental fillings, or toxic landfills. If it’s too dangerous for the environment, why is it injected into children? She also highlights that aluminum, another vaccine ingredient, poses similar risks by crossing the blood-brain barrier. The science is clear: neurotoxins have no place in our bodies. It’s time to rethink vaccine safety. Why are we risking our children’s health with substances that require hazmat cleanup? Share this post to spark a conversation and demand transparency.

Camus

23,556 次观看 • 1 年前

The Great Lie of "Safe Mercury" in Vaccines, Exposed. They told you the mercury in vaccines is the "good" kind. They told you it leaves the body quickly. They told you it's safer than the mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. According to RFK Jr., they knew it was a lie. And he has the evidence. The claim that ethylmercury (Thimerosal) is rapidly excreted originated with its creator, Eli Lilly, in 1930—with zero scientific backing. Decades later, it became a mantra, seemingly validated by a 2003 CDC study (Pichichero) that showed mercury from vaccines vanishing from children's blood within days, while mercury from tuna remained for weeks. But world-renowned toxicologists asked the critical question: "Where did the ethylmercury go?" It wasn't in the blood, sweat, urine, or hair. So, the NIH commissioned a definitive monkey study (Burbacher). The results were damning: • The vaccine mercury did quickly clear the blood, just as in the children. • But when researchers examined the monkeys' brains, they made a shocking discovery. • The monkeys who received the vaccine-preservative mercury had MORE THAN DOUBLE the mercury in their brains compared to the tuna-fed monkeys. • Worse, the ethylmercury had metabolized into inorganic mercury, a highly toxic form that can persist in the brain for decades. The "good mercury" was not only staying in the body—it was targeting the brain more aggressively than its so-called "bad" counterpart. RFK Jr. recounts a recorded conversation with Dr. Paul Offit, a leading vaccine advocate, who repeated this "good mercury vs. bad mercury" fairytale. When confronted with the Burbacher monkey study, Offit fell silent, admitted the original study didn't prove the claim, and promised to "get back to him." He never did. The truth is mercury is cumulative. FDA internal studies have shown children receive mercury exposures from vaccines hundreds of times over safety limits. While industry defenders correctly state we are exposed to mercury from other environmental sources, injecting a potent neurotoxin directly into the bloodstream—one that crosses the blood-brain barrier and lodges itself there—is not a solution. It's a catastrophic part of the problem. This isn't a medical debate. It's a betrayal of public trust. The science has been clear for years, and they know it.

The Great Lie of "Safe Mercury" in Vaccines, Exposed. They told you the mercury in vaccines is the "good" kind. They told you it leaves the body quickly. They told you it's safer than the mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. According to RFK Jr., they knew it was a lie. And he has the evidence. The claim that ethylmercury (Thimerosal) is rapidly excreted originated with its creator, Eli Lilly, in 1930—with zero scientific backing. Decades later, it became a mantra, seemingly validated by a 2003 CDC study (Pichichero) that showed mercury from vaccines vanishing from children's blood within days, while mercury from tuna remained for weeks. But world-renowned toxicologists asked the critical question: "Where did the ethylmercury go?" It wasn't in the blood, sweat, urine, or hair. So, the NIH commissioned a definitive monkey study (Burbacher). The results were damning: • The vaccine mercury did quickly clear the blood, just as in the children. • But when researchers examined the monkeys' brains, they made a shocking discovery. • The monkeys who received the vaccine-preservative mercury had MORE THAN DOUBLE the mercury in their brains compared to the tuna-fed monkeys. • Worse, the ethylmercury had metabolized into inorganic mercury, a highly toxic form that can persist in the brain for decades. The "good mercury" was not only staying in the body—it was targeting the brain more aggressively than its so-called "bad" counterpart. RFK Jr. recounts a recorded conversation with Dr. Paul Offit, a leading vaccine advocate, who repeated this "good mercury vs. bad mercury" fairytale. When confronted with the Burbacher monkey study, Offit fell silent, admitted the original study didn't prove the claim, and promised to "get back to him." He never did. The truth is mercury is cumulative. FDA internal studies have shown children receive mercury exposures from vaccines hundreds of times over safety limits. While industry defenders correctly state we are exposed to mercury from other environmental sources, injecting a potent neurotoxin directly into the bloodstream—one that crosses the blood-brain barrier and lodges itself there—is not a solution. It's a catastrophic part of the problem. This isn't a medical debate. It's a betrayal of public trust. The science has been clear for years, and they know it.

Camus

81,588 次观看 • 11 个月前

Michael from Conflict Radio describes a Stargate beneath Green Mountain, Alabama, explaining that it exists as a chamber used to transfer consciousness. He says the technology works with liquid mercury and is able to transfer consciousness into biological UFOs or craft. He also explains that Nordic extraterrestrials and international pilots selected for this secret program are involved in its use. Full interview:

Michael from Conflict Radio describes a Stargate beneath Green Mountain, Alabama, explaining that it exists as a chamber used to transfer consciousness. He says the technology works with liquid mercury and is able to transfer consciousness into biological UFOs or craft. He also explains that Nordic extraterrestrials and international pilots selected for this secret program are involved in its use. Full interview:

Michael Salla

12,834 次观看 • 2 个月前

if you’re a YC backed startup, Sign up for Avici and get $250. or refer a YC startup to get $250. access stablecoin powered Visa cards,0% spread pay and get paid with 0% fees to convert stablecoins ↔ fiat , 100k usdc = $100k think mercury but onchain & self custodial

if you’re a YC backed startup, Sign up for Avici and get $250. or refer a YC startup to get $250. access stablecoin powered Visa cards,0% spread pay and get paid with 0% fees to convert stablecoins ↔ fiat , 100k usdc = $100k think mercury but onchain & self custodial

Ram

34,246 次观看 • 7 个月前

You can see here a NEW video, which shows the second critical step, of trying to make a UFO-propulsion drive from a spinning vortex of the liquid metal "galinstan". The spin force is a bit weak with 11 "thin" magnets around the outside, but am I try to reduce total weight. We will learn whether this idea works on the third and final step (soon). 🛸

You can see here a NEW video, which shows the second critical step, of trying to make a UFO-propulsion drive from a spinning vortex of the liquid metal "galinstan". The spin force is a bit weak with 11 "thin" magnets around the outside, but am I try to reduce total weight. We will learn whether this idea works on the third and final step (soon). 🛸

Red Collie (Dr. Horace Drew) scientist/inventor

101,109 次观看 • 1 年前

Ancient India's Hidden Knowledge? The Baan Stambh at Somnath Temple claims that a straight line south leads directly to Antarctica-with no land in between! But how did people in the 7th century know this without satellites or maps? Science or mystery? Comment your thoughts

Ancient India's Hidden Knowledge? The Baan Stambh at Somnath Temple claims that a straight line south leads directly to Antarctica-with no land in between! But how did people in the 7th century know this without satellites or maps? Science or mystery? Comment your thoughts

𝐑𝖎𝖌𝖍𝖙𝖊𝖔𝖚𝐬 𝐌𝖆𝐲𝖆𝖓𝐤 𝐑𝖆𝐣𝖕𝖚𝖙

91,791 次观看 • 1 年前

Dereck Lively II is able to move and lift again but not able to run or jump yet. He’s taking more time than he needs just to make sure he doesn’t have to deal with the foot injury again. He said he’s more flexible, able to lift more and tries to do 10,000-15,000 steps a day.

Dereck Lively II is able to move and lift again but not able to run or jump yet. He’s taking more time than he needs just to make sure he doesn’t have to deal with the foot injury again. He said he’s more flexible, able to lift more and tries to do 10,000-15,000 steps a day.

Landon Thomas

16,699 次观看 • 3 个月前

In April 1942 the Air Force configured a Douglas A-20A Havoc to demonstrate two 1,000-lb-thrust liquid-propellant JATO units mounted in the engine nacelles for shorter takeoff runs and improved performance. The A-20A completed 44 successful firings with no stability or control issues.👀

In April 1942 the Air Force configured a Douglas A-20A Havoc to demonstrate two 1,000-lb-thrust liquid-propellant JATO units mounted in the engine nacelles for shorter takeoff runs and improved performance. The A-20A completed 44 successful firings with no stability or control issues.👀

Aviation Archive - Tim Farmer

26,280 次观看 • 5 个月前

You've been told that red mercury is fake. A hoax. A myth sold to desperate buyers. But here's the proof—and that's exactly why they didn't want you to ever see it. This isn't just another picture. Look closer: ✅ HG99 – The chemical signature associated with red mercury compounds. ✅ RM – Red mercury. Labeled. Documented. Genuine. ✅ RADIOACTIVE – Not a rumor. Not a theory. A warning. ✅ SOLID COPPER TAPE, RED – The exact physical description insiders have been giving for decades. ✅ 6660 (2012) – An encrypted mark. A date. Or something far more specific. This is what they've been hiding. Governments have denied its existence. The media have ridiculed it. But here it is – marked, secret, and radioactive. They fear what will happen when the truth comes out. An arms race. Weapons in the wrong hands. Or worse – that they'll realize they've been lying about everything. But as I always say, do your own research.I am not omniscient😉

You've been told that red mercury is fake. A hoax. A myth sold to desperate buyers. But here's the proof—and that's exactly why they didn't want you to ever see it. This isn't just another picture. Look closer: ✅ HG99 – The chemical signature associated with red mercury compounds. ✅ RM – Red mercury. Labeled. Documented. Genuine. ✅ RADIOACTIVE – Not a rumor. Not a theory. A warning. ✅ SOLID COPPER TAPE, RED – The exact physical description insiders have been giving for decades. ✅ 6660 (2012) – An encrypted mark. A date. Or something far more specific. This is what they've been hiding. Governments have denied its existence. The media have ridiculed it. But here it is – marked, secret, and radioactive. They fear what will happen when the truth comes out. An arms race. Weapons in the wrong hands. Or worse – that they'll realize they've been lying about everything. But as I always say, do your own research.I am not omniscient😉

Andy

104,459 次观看 • 5 个月前

MY STRAY KIDS WITH 6 ALBUMS CHARTING AT THE SAME TIME ON BILLBOARD! AND YET CERTAIN PEOPLE CLAIMS THEY ARE FLOPS AND NOBODY LISTEN TO THEM. NO BOTS, NO STREAMING FARMS, NO SALES OR CHARTS MANIPULATION. AND NOT FROM A CORRUPTED COMPANY. I'M A PROUD STAY❤️

MY STRAY KIDS WITH 6 ALBUMS CHARTING AT THE SAME TIME ON BILLBOARD! AND YET CERTAIN PEOPLE CLAIMS THEY ARE FLOPS AND NOBODY LISTEN TO THEM. NO BOTS, NO STREAMING FARMS, NO SALES OR CHARTS MANIPULATION. AND NOT FROM A CORRUPTED COMPANY. I'M A PROUD STAY❤️

𝕯𝖔 𝖎𝐭 𝔇𝔦𝔳𝔦𝔫𝔢

25,680 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 Breaking - Witness in Houston reports a silent, low altitude object moving steadily across the sky with no visible propulsion or sound. Close enough to throw something at it, yet completely quiet . no rotor noise, no engine, nothing. If it’s a drone, it’s operating far quieter and closer than typical consumer or commercial models. If it’s not, then we’re again looking at objects that don’t behave the way conventional technology should. The pattern isn’t just sightings , it’s how often these objects appear silent, controlled, and just out of clear identification.

🚨 Breaking - Witness in Houston reports a silent, low altitude object moving steadily across the sky with no visible propulsion or sound. Close enough to throw something at it, yet completely quiet . no rotor noise, no engine, nothing. If it’s a drone, it’s operating far quieter and closer than typical consumer or commercial models. If it’s not, then we’re again looking at objects that don’t behave the way conventional technology should. The pattern isn’t just sightings , it’s how often these objects appear silent, controlled, and just out of clear identification.

T R U T H P O L E

517,981 次观看 • 6 个月前

$"Superfluid Vortices as a Model for Gravitational Precession" with Implications for Electromagnetism Authors: Matt Baker, Alan Baker Superfluid vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate provide a framework for modeling gravitational effects, particularly the precession of planetary orbits, building on concepts of superfluidity in quantum systems. Calculations using modified Navier-Stokes equations and angular momentum terms for vortex dynamics predict the orbital precession of Venus, Earth, and Mars, matching observed data within one, two, and three arc seconds per century, respectively, employing a superfluid of sub-quark-scale particles, below 10^-15 meters, which remain undetectable due to their infinitesimal size and ability to flow through detection instruments unimpeded by thermal interactions. The theoretical framework employs Bernoulli’s principle, where large, slow-spinning vortices create low-pressure zones, producing a gravitational-like pull over long distances. At sub-electromagnetic scales, below 10^-17 meters, these vortices operate without directly interacting with electromagnetic fields, yet their rapid dynamics could indirectly influence such interactions. Analysis indicates that tighter, faster vortices generate localized forces resembling electromagnetic interactions, with the work done scaling similarly to gravitational effects but over much shorter distances, suggesting a unified mechanism across scales. Experimental validation is proposed through a Superfluid Vortex Collider (SFVC), where quantized vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate at near-absolute-zero temperatures would be collided. Predictions indicate that microvortices from these collisions could replicate gravitational interactions, with quantum coherence in Bose-Einstein condensates, as demonstrated (Jin et al., 1996), supporting the feasibility of such experiments. Superfluid vortex dynamics offer a model for gravity with potential extensions to electromagnetism. The increasing discrepancies with orbital distance suggest a distance-dependent vortex parameter, alongside variations in vortex speed, angular momentum, effective viscosity, or planetary density, which could be refined to further align predictions with observations. Future investigations could explore vortex entanglement in ultra-coherent conditions, though achieving such conditions remains challenging. References L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (Oxford University Press, 2016). D. S. Jin, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Collective excitations of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a dilute atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 420 (1996). Appendix: Mathematical Derivations To model planetary precession, modified Navier-Stokes equations for superfluids were employed, incorporating angular momentum terms for vortex dynamics. For a vortex with circulation \(\Gamma\), the velocity field \(v(r) = \Gamma/(2\pi r)\) creates a low-pressure zone via Bernoulli’s principle, yielding a gravitational-like force scaling as \(F \propto 1/r^2\). Orbital precession was calculated using the angular momentum contribution \(L = mvr\), adjusted for vortex-induced perturbations, resulting in precession rates of 43 arc seconds per century for Venus (observed: 42 arc seconds), 3.8 arc seconds per century for Earth (observed: 5.0 arc seconds), and 1.4 arc seconds per century for Mars (observed: 4.0 arc seconds). Discrepancies may stem from variations in vortex speed \(\Gamma\) or effective planetary density \(\rho\). For electromagnetic interactions, tighter vortices with higher angular velocity \(\omega\) were analyzed. The force generated scales as \(F \propto \omega^2/r^2\), resembling electromagnetic interactions at scales of 10^-17 meters. The work done, integrated over distance, yields a ratio comparable to gravitational work at larger scales, supporting a unified force model.$

"Superfluid Vortices as a Model for Gravitational Precession" with Implications for Electromagnetism Authors: Matt Baker, Alan Baker Superfluid vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate provide a framework for modeling gravitational effects, particularly the precession of planetary orbits, building on concepts of superfluidity in quantum systems. Calculations using modified Navier-Stokes equations and angular momentum terms for vortex dynamics predict the orbital precession of Venus, Earth, and Mars, matching observed data within one, two, and three arc seconds per century, respectively, employing a superfluid of sub-quark-scale particles, below 10^-15 meters, which remain undetectable due to their infinitesimal size and ability to flow through detection instruments unimpeded by thermal interactions. The theoretical framework employs Bernoulli’s principle, where large, slow-spinning vortices create low-pressure zones, producing a gravitational-like pull over long distances. At sub-electromagnetic scales, below 10^-17 meters, these vortices operate without directly interacting with electromagnetic fields, yet their rapid dynamics could indirectly influence such interactions. Analysis indicates that tighter, faster vortices generate localized forces resembling electromagnetic interactions, with the work done scaling similarly to gravitational effects but over much shorter distances, suggesting a unified mechanism across scales. Experimental validation is proposed through a Superfluid Vortex Collider (SFVC), where quantized vortices in a Bose-Einstein condensate at near-absolute-zero temperatures would be collided. Predictions indicate that microvortices from these collisions could replicate gravitational interactions, with quantum coherence in Bose-Einstein condensates, as demonstrated (Jin et al., 1996), supporting the feasibility of such experiments. Superfluid vortex dynamics offer a model for gravity with potential extensions to electromagnetism. The increasing discrepancies with orbital distance suggest a distance-dependent vortex parameter, alongside variations in vortex speed, angular momentum, effective viscosity, or planetary density, which could be refined to further align predictions with observations. Future investigations could explore vortex entanglement in ultra-coherent conditions, though achieving such conditions remains challenging. References L. P. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari, Bose-Einstein Condensation and Superfluidity (Oxford University Press, 2016). D. S. Jin, J. R. Ensher, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell, Collective excitations of a Bose-Einstein condensate in a dilute atomic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 420 (1996). Appendix: Mathematical Derivations To model planetary precession, modified Navier-Stokes equations for superfluids were employed, incorporating angular momentum terms for vortex dynamics. For a vortex with circulation \(\Gamma\), the velocity field \(v(r) = \Gamma/(2\pi r)\) creates a low-pressure zone via Bernoulli’s principle, yielding a gravitational-like force scaling as \(F \propto 1/r^2\). Orbital precession was calculated using the angular momentum contribution \(L = mvr\), adjusted for vortex-induced perturbations, resulting in precession rates of 43 arc seconds per century for Venus (observed: 42 arc seconds), 3.8 arc seconds per century for Earth (observed: 5.0 arc seconds), and 1.4 arc seconds per century for Mars (observed: 4.0 arc seconds). Discrepancies may stem from variations in vortex speed \(\Gamma\) or effective planetary density \(\rho\). For electromagnetic interactions, tighter vortices with higher angular velocity \(\omega\) were analyzed. The force generated scales as \(F \propto \omega^2/r^2\), resembling electromagnetic interactions at scales of 10^-17 meters. The work done, integrated over distance, yields a ratio comparable to gravitational work at larger scales, supporting a unified force model.

Matt Baker

33,215 次观看 • 1 年前

Georges St-Pierre travels to Oregon to spend a day with Bob Lazar — the man who claims he was hired to reverse-engineer an anti-gravity propulsion system on a craft that did not come from this planet. Bob and GSP discuss the scientists the world never hears about, the inventions that quietly disappeared, and why a secret this big has held for sixty years. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We're not there yet. But we went to look. 👓🛸

Georges St-Pierre travels to Oregon to spend a day with Bob Lazar — the man who claims he was hired to reverse-engineer an anti-gravity propulsion system on a craft that did not come from this planet. Bob and GSP discuss the scientists the world never hears about, the inventions that quietly disappeared, and why a secret this big has held for sixty years. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. We're not there yet. But we went to look. 👓🛸

GSP Podcast

15,653 次观看 • 1 个月前