Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
abc123 reported that a man in Houston TX was arrested after allegedly calling the governor's office and threatened to stab everyone if an age restriction wasn't taken off Crunchyroll The exact quote: "“I don’t know which one of you sons of bitches passed this motherfucking bill to get this... show more
40,610 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
![Hero–Doctor Kirk Moore, who's now facing 35 years in prison, defends his decision to give saline injections instead of COVID death jabs: "What law did I break?.... [there was] no ingredient list... no toxicity studies... [the jabs were] studied for a total of two months." This clip of board-certified plastic surgeon Dr. Kirk Moore (@Moore22K) is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) posted to Rumble on June 10, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So my one position that I've said all along is, what law did I break? There is no law. There was no Covid law passed. There was no. Nothing that said that I had to do whatever the government says that I need to do. There's no law that says that. And the government is trying to kind of put me into this fraud side, like you said, you know, saying I. That I absconded or I misused or I purloined, you know, $28,000, $28,800 worth of product that they gave me for free and that, you know, that I had a contract with them to give it in such a way. So, I think that's, you know, that That's That's the law side of it. "The ethical side of it wasn't that hard for me. I'm doing what my patients wanted me to do. After a full discussion of what it is. I, have no ingredient list. I don't know what this product is. There are no toxicity studies. There are no carcinogenic, you know, carcinogenic studies. There are no mutagenic studies. There's nothing out there. This is something that was studied for a total of two months. "And the control group was. Was terminated, because they found that it had 95% effectiveness. Once the numbers came out and it showed that that actual effectiveness was less than 1%, by an absolute risk reduction, then that in and of itself should prove, you know, should show that, hey, this is just ridiculous. There was no benefit. There's nothing out there. "You know, you look at Brook Jackson's study and what it was that she was, you know, that she's tried to present in Texas. That's been thrown out, at least twice now. And you just look at all of the. Everything that's behind it. You know, you mentioned, you know, the ethical side of it. You know, the AMA code of ethics says that a physician is supposed to take care of the patient that's in front of them. Okay? That's your oath. My oath is if you were my patient, I would take care of you. You tell me what your concerns are, you tell me, you know, what your symptoms are, and we come up with a plan. I explain to you what the pros and cons of that are, and then you and I come up with a plan on how to treat you. "And I'm not treating you for your husband or your kids or your neighbors or anybody else. I'm treating you that's in front of you. Okay, that's in front of me. And we come up with a plan. So that's the code of ethics. "There's also a known issue with medicine and the legal system. And the, again, the AMA code of ethics says two things. We know that there is going to be a conflict between ethical and moral medical treatment of people and the law at times. And so as a physician, your duty is to try to do what you can, to do both to take care of your patient and to kind of reconcile the law. "So I did. I went to the state of Utah, I went to the House, I went to some of the Senate subcommittees, I, I was, I testified in some of these committee hearings, to try to get laws changed, mandate laws, mask mandates, Covid mandates, shot mandates. And we were successful. In the state of Utah, we were able to pass laws, that reversed the mask mandates. That made it actually, to some degree, a fineable offense for businesses to require Covid vaccines in order to go to work and to go to school. "And so that was my first step. The second step out of this is that if you cannot change that during the time that you're doing, you are, by ethics and moral values, you are required to take care of your patient in front of you, not to abide by, like you said, to abide by the law. So where is the AMA and all this? That's their code of ethics. I don't see them standing behind me and, you know, and trying to support the medical values and ethics that they, that, you know, that they claim on their website is one of, you know, one of their, you know, bastions of health and what physicians need to do."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1932910733140111732/amplify_video_thumb/1932907167931088896/img/iZ_xepSyv5UUHCM_.jpg)
![Putin responds to Zelensky’s ‘open letter,’ calling for a direct meeting between the two leaders (my translation): “Yesterday my press secretary, Mr Peskov, showed me this letter. But we had a working meeting, a working dinner with the president of Uzbekistan. Honestly, I didn’t have time to read it. “This morning Peskov slipped the paper to me again. I glanced through it quickly, but still, there are a few things I’d point out. First, the author of the letter mentioned my age. Well, what can I say? Of course, everyone should think about age. But it seems to me that plenty of political figures do their jobs at my age, and some are even older than I am. “The main thing is not age. Age matters, of course, but it’s not the main thing. The main thing is whether a person is capable and able to work. Some of my colleagues, older than me, show plenty of energy. Whether they do their jobs well or badly is another matter. That’s a political judgement. But they are active. “Then I noticed the point about how long someone has held elected office. That’s an important question, of course. But you have to go to elections. You have to go to elections, not be afraid of them, and always act within the Constitution. “Because holding on to power outside the Constitution is called usurpation of power. That’s is a criminal offence. So there is no need to be afraid. Go to elections. I would advise everyone to do that. Especially since in Ukraine they were saying elections would be held soon, and then somehow everyone went quiet. It’s not clear why. “Now, the author also writes that one should not follow the agreements reached in Anchorage. More than that, he says real guarantors for possible agreements between Russia and Ukraine should be found in [Western]Europe. “Well, reliable guarantors never hurt. Of course they don’t. But why the US administration and President Trump are being rejected in that role, I don’t really understand. They want weapons from the United States, but for some reason they don’t want the US administration and President Trump as guarantors. That raises questions. “We all saw Donald, in front of the whole world, educating the author of this letter and pointing out the dress code. You understand? Constantly playing Rambo, First Blood, may be appropriate somewhere. But not everywhere. Not everywhere. “As for the agreements overall, I want to thank Donald for this work. It’s useful, no doubt. But there’s still work to do. We need to continue.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2062921877769556002/amplify_video_thumb/2062921749017038848/img/QoDWL3TY13MePS5i.jpg)
