Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Abolish the Indian Act?
24,663 views • 12 days ago •via X (Twitter)
30 Comments

150 years of welfare is enough.

@unlearn16tweet I thought it was unacceptable to call chugs; indians in 2026? In a sane world; you would be committed to an institution.

Have always loved Wab, but his sound bite unleashed a whole whack of racism on this app and beyond. My take, you can’t abolish the Indian Act until you can replace it with something that protects our treaty rights. The IA is very carefully designed that way, that eventually we would want to do away with the awful in it in exchange for total assimilation. Absolutely no way. There needs to be a better way.

Imagine this THING teaching your kids. This is everything wrong with the world today

Anyone watching this person can easily identify she is incorrect by her saying it was "criminal to fight for what was owed to you." Firstly, no one 'owes' another land they do not inhabit and have no anthropogenic use/occupancy of (no material relationship to, no legitimate claim or connection). That is just assuming the supremacy of your own prospective colonization interest or trajectory, on the basis of some random chance of DNA from what is nonetheless a continous migratory trajectory (determinately), over those already there first / actual endogenous inhabitants (those actually present/of/with longer history on that land). Secondly, the very concept and actualized system of: - land ownership - territory - jursidiction - government - stewardship and land management, was not found among nomadic Siberian hunter-colonies (which are not "indigenous" but of observably and continually evolving migratory dispersals of some the longest, and most sparse migrations in human history). Given they were nonetheless alien to around ~100% of land area that today ad-hoc fictive absentee 'territorial' conceptions are projected upon, the idea that it was "criminalized" to "fight" for something that actually belongs to you is a myth. That land does not belong to you, and it was simply because these cases were spurious and still are that this was forbidden. Territory =/= anthropogenic use/occupancy, this is a myth which is used to build homogenous racial-colonization ranges derivative of exogenous migratory origin and continuity, in absent alien occupation (think usurping vast swathes of uninhabited natural land area for yourself based on esoteric entitlement or envious spite of the random chance of having copies of DNA from extinct migrants in some past space relatively closer earlier but still alien to the future space).

I seen this dude before somewhere

Thank you for this! Sorry you take so much flak for simply sharing history. You don’t deserve it.

Thank you for that good outline.

This is exactly the bossy, angry, sanctimonious, armchair moralist who does not belong around children.

Donate your entire salary to the government. You’ll be better than everyone else.

1876, the year the American General Custer was killed Germany was 4 years old BC joined (the Prairies (Still belonged to the Hudson Bay Company) The Trans Canada Railroad had just been completed. What was Canada to do with her uneducated Stone Age hunter-gatherers?

What is this retard talking about…the chug act? I say bring back the schools and pass out gas rags.

Sweet now let’s stop paying for all the benefits they get with the status card too

Dumb retarded gender confused loser! No one cares what you have to say dyke!

It established Indian self government and legal framework for entitlements Activists shouldn't be brainwashing students with this one sided genocide BULLLLLSHIIIIT Treaties established the entitlements Most demanding EDUCATION and were on RESERVES The historical timeline on the board is standard textbook material, but the pass-system conflation is a clear error, and the presentation (like most short activist or classroom versions) flattens the practical and political reasons the Act has survived repeated attempts at abolition or radical reform. Abolition remains complicated precisely because the Act is both a tool of historical control and the current legal scaffolding for status, reserves, and certain entitlements.

guess this stupid bitch was there in 1876 when this act was formed, since she knows so much about it🤣

Arent you the dimwit who can't tell seperate from separate?

Jog on, you shrill, bombastic harpy. You really think anyone is interested in your sanctimonious ideological lectures, you flinty-looking harridan? Go away, you shrieking political kommissar fishwife, and take your screeching Marxist struggle sessions with you.

🎯🎯🎯

Twat

Wish I could hear this...the sound is SO low.

Why do you hate using the term Indian? We grew up playing Cowboys and Indians not Cowboys and First Nations.

Cool hair cut, wonderful performance!

The retards can pay taxes like the rest of us

Why do you waste your time getting mad for others?

I’m curious what this would mean for my mom who has official status 🤔

why is this ugly deranged lunatic in my feed

🤮 this annoying bitch straight up looks like red skull 💀

Until they start speaking honestly about their old true feelings on homosexuality and unnatural gender Ideologies then its throw the bigots out right

You’re getting close to figuring out what’s actually going on, but you need to think more outside of the leftist box. Why are people suddenly wanting to abolish the Indian act?, what do they stand to gain?, and what are the consequences to this?. Who stands to gain control?.🤷♂️….

