正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Abortion is never medically necessary. Complications can arise during pregnancy that require the baby to be delivered early. But this doesn't require the extra step of injecting poison into the child's heart or dismembering the child limb from limb. Lila Rose shares this powerful truth on Jubilee: Women AND...

105,990 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

11 条评论

House of Trad 的头像
House of Trad1 年前

@LilaGraceRose So sad

I Meme You No Harm 的头像
I Meme You No Harm1 年前

@LilaGraceRose It is never acceptable to nor necessary to kill an unborn baby. There are always other options. The abortion industry pushes what makes them money, and they should be prosecuted for doing it.

Emerald Rose 🍀 的头像
Emerald Rose 🍀1 年前

@LilaGraceRose Medical professionals say differently. Abortion is a necessary medical procedure. When the pregnant person's life is in jeopardy the doctor will go do what is safest and easiest for their patient.

Cat Rock 🇺🇸 的头像
Cat Rock 🇺🇸1 年前

@LilaGraceRose Lila nailed her!

Dr. Jennifer J Schwirzer 的头像
Dr. Jennifer J Schwirzer1 年前

@LilaGraceRose She has no argument for Lila. How about that.

Redemption365 的头像
Redemption3651 年前

@LilaGraceRose Doctors lie, mate was told the baby had down syndrome and they recommended an abortion and was born normal, 6 years on and he is an intelligent kid. The only boy with 3 sisters.

Lila Rose 的头像
Lila Rose1 年前

I am unpacking the debate LIVE now!

Elise Oyin 的头像
Elise Oyin1 年前

I, Elise Oyinkromeineifa, my pregnancy n all babies in me HAVE NEVER AGREED TO BE THE HOST OF VOODOO spirit, spirits N gods and we never will, I am married to no voodoo spirit, spirits n my pregnancy and my womb is not calabash, house for them to stay in

Darcy Gray 的头像
Darcy Gray1 年前

@LilaGraceRose Abortion is always medically necessary It’s the only way to end a harmful and potentially fatal medical condition

Sheiias Ars Goetia 的头像
Sheiias Ars Goetia1 年前

@LilaGraceRose It was necessary to save my life. But good to see a pro life group doesn’t care about my life

Lisa Baker Graas 🇻🇦🖤 的头像
Lisa Baker Graas 🇻🇦🖤1 年前

@LilaGraceRose A lot of the problem is that so many people don't even know that an abortion is the direct and intentional killing of a living unborn child. It's not a miscarriage. It's not a death from early delivery. It's direct and intentional murder.

相关视频

Erin Friday says that in states like California, parents risk losing their children if they refuse to transition them. She broke down to me how Child Protective Services can take children and strip parents of their rights once a child enters the system. “I have evidence of school counselors telling children how to use Child Protective Services to get away from their parents who refuse to capitulate and call them another gender.” “Once that child then gets into the crosshairs of Child Protective Services, the child can be taken and placed in a temporary foster care family.” “During that interim, the parents are being investigated.” “They can be investigated just from not calling their child a male or female name, whichever the child wants.” “There are foster care bill of rights in many of the blue states.” “Those bill of rights require that the child be housed based on gender identity… not their sex.” “So we take a child and put them in a very vulnerable position.” “The Bill of Rights also allows the child to get sex-rejecting interventions.” “You don’t need consent from the parents anymore.” “You get child and government consent to cross sex hormones, puberty blockers, name change.” “Parents essentially lose their parental rights to the government as long as those parents refuse to transition their children.” “These children are taught also to make false claims of abuse, not just emotional abuse, but physical abuse.” “The parents can’t even go to the press about what is happening to their child.” Erin Friday, Esq.

Jan Jekielek

13,429 次观看 • 6 个月前

NEW: Hawaii Bill HB2079 Legalizes Kidnapping Children Across State Lines Directly From Hawaii Free Press “HB2079 Would Legalize Child Kidnapping for Sex Change” The Bill “Also forbids the entire state of Hawaii, including the governor, from disclosing records or extraditing any kidnapper charged in another state so long as the kidnapper alleges that the purpose of taking the child was to provide access to gender affirming care” Bill HB2079 “Forbids the courts from returning any child kidnapped from their home state. What in It gives them legal jurisdiction over your child.” “It also makes it a crime to interfere with the kidnappers or to disclose any data about the gender affirming care with anyone other than the kidnap kidnap kidnapper petitioner even if it's ordered by another court. And it would also become a crime under state law to comply with any oversight or investigation into the kidnappings from” More details on the Bill from Hawaii Free Press: “The Hawaii Kidnapping Bill's unique and unmistakable true intent is to allow legal protections for any non-parent with sufficient access and means to remove a child of any age from their home state, and to bring them to Hawaii in the name of receiving “Gender Affirming Care” – so long as they could not receive said ‘care’ in their home state. The many sections of Hawaii Revised Statutes affected by the Hawaii Kidnapping Bill are designed to trigger a series of child-custody 'loopholes' that cause inter-state barriers to be systematically removed, so long as the instigator says the magic words: “Gender Affirming Care.” “The bill's proposed amendments to the UCCJEA redefine a family-court emergency, to allow any person “acting as a parent” to obtain emergency temporary custody against natural parents who decline to provide their children so-called “Gender Affirming Care.” Natural parents’ refusal to provide sex-change procedures would be treated as being of the same legal weight and severity as actual physical abuse or child abandonment. The bill reads: §583A-204, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended by amending subsection (a) to read as follows: (a) A court of this State [has] shall have temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in this State and the child has been abandoned or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because [the]: (1) The child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse[.]; or (2) The child has been unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services. This language plainly redefines a custody “emergency” to mean “unable to obtain gender‑affirming health care services.”

Wall Street Apes

269,970 次观看 • 2 年前