Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨ABOUT FIRST AMENDMENT AUDITORS: 👮‍♂️Recording on a public sidewalk is not illegal. It's a Constitutional Right. Aggressively approaching someone filming is never a good idea. Just mind your business. 🔥This guy found out the hard way—with a face full of pepper spray.

ScottEnlow's profile picture

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

51,996 subscribers

17,573 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

NEW: Bystander uses pepper spray on a person who was apparently about to get into a fight with someone else at a beach in Miami The person who recorded the video says: "I swear we can never have a - calm beach day. Dude came out of nowhere to pepper spray this guy. Yes he was out of line but some random didn't need to come to the "rescue" it's windy and pepper. spray travels"
0:23

NEW: Bystander uses pepper spray on a person who was apparently about to get into a fight with someone else at a beach in Miami The person who recorded the video says: "I swear we can never have a - calm beach day. Dude came out of nowhere to pepper spray this guy. Yes he was out of line but some random didn't need to come to the "rescue" it's windy and pepper. spray travels"

Unlimited L's

92,615 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

First Amendment auditors are right. Feelings are not law. At a Chick-fil-A, auditors stood on the public sidewalk filming. The manager called police, claiming they were filming “private property,” making guests uncomfortable, and “scanning” vehicles. She wanted them stopped. Police officer did the correct thing: he explained the actual law. The sidewalk is public property, frequented by the public. It is not illegal to record from that location in Tennessee. He pointed out the clear line—if they stepped onto Chick-fil-A property, they could be asked to leave. While they stayed on the public side, they were free to film. He even noted he could walk around with a camera himself from the same spots. That is the entire ballgame. Public spaces belong to the public. What you can see with your eyes from a public sidewalk, you can generally record. This is core First Amendment territory—freedom of the press and the right to gather information in places open to everyone. Courts have repeatedly upheld this. Discomfort, customer complaints, or a business’s preference do not create a new exception. “It makes people feel followed” is not a legal standard. If it were, news crews, citizen journalists, and anyone with a phone could be shut down every time someone felt uneasy. Yes, the auditors could choose a less confrontational style. Standing there with cameras pointed at a drive-thru and parking lot will annoy people. That is obvious. But annoyance is not illegality. The point of these audits is often to test whether officers and businesses actually know the boundary between private property rights and public rights. In this case the officer did. The manager did not. When people start treating “I don’t like it” as equivalent to “you can’t do that,” the First Amendment erodes. Auditors force the conversation back to the actual rules instead of vibes. That is why they keep doing it—and why this one was clean. Public means public. Record away.
2:38

First Amendment auditors are right. Feelings are not law. At a Chick-fil-A, auditors stood on the public sidewalk filming. The manager called police, claiming they were filming “private property,” making guests uncomfortable, and “scanning” vehicles. She wanted them stopped. Police officer did the correct thing: he explained the actual law. The sidewalk is public property, frequented by the public. It is not illegal to record from that location in Tennessee. He pointed out the clear line—if they stepped onto Chick-fil-A property, they could be asked to leave. While they stayed on the public side, they were free to film. He even noted he could walk around with a camera himself from the same spots. That is the entire ballgame. Public spaces belong to the public. What you can see with your eyes from a public sidewalk, you can generally record. This is core First Amendment territory—freedom of the press and the right to gather information in places open to everyone. Courts have repeatedly upheld this. Discomfort, customer complaints, or a business’s preference do not create a new exception. “It makes people feel followed” is not a legal standard. If it were, news crews, citizen journalists, and anyone with a phone could be shut down every time someone felt uneasy. Yes, the auditors could choose a less confrontational style. Standing there with cameras pointed at a drive-thru and parking lot will annoy people. That is obvious. But annoyance is not illegality. The point of these audits is often to test whether officers and businesses actually know the boundary between private property rights and public rights. In this case the officer did. The manager did not. When people start treating “I don’t like it” as equivalent to “you can’t do that,” the First Amendment erodes. Auditors force the conversation back to the actual rules instead of vibes. That is why they keep doing it—and why this one was clean. Public means public. Record away.

DocumentingLibs

69,323 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Filming ICE in public is protected speech. If someone with a badge loses their temper, your constitutional rights don’t disappear. explains: When an agent gets inches from your face and screams “18 U.S.C. 111” while threatening cuffs just to make you stop recording — that’s not “law and order.” That’s First Amendment retaliation. FIGHT ICE WITH PAXIS so people know their rights:
0:54

Filming ICE in public is protected speech. If someone with a badge loses their temper, your constitutional rights don’t disappear. explains: When an agent gets inches from your face and screams “18 U.S.C. 111” while threatening cuffs just to make you stop recording — that’s not “law and order.” That’s First Amendment retaliation. FIGHT ICE WITH PAXIS so people know their rights:

Joe Walsh

83,362 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Courts have repeatedly and explicitly upheld the right to film anyone in public places anywhere in the United States under the First Amendment. This woman "in the film industry" is confusing getting a release for private filming for private profit with the constitutional right of recording in public. Bonus: She's demonstrating the Streisand Effect.
1:26

Courts have repeatedly and explicitly upheld the right to film anyone in public places anywhere in the United States under the First Amendment. This woman "in the film industry" is confusing getting a release for private filming for private profit with the constitutional right of recording in public. Bonus: She's demonstrating the Streisand Effect.

Sebastian™

19,858 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Lyman: Running someone over with a car is a crime. That’s what Renee Good did. She accelerated. Sellers: Should they still be alive? Lyman: Of course, I wish they did not put themselves in this position. Running someone over with your car is not a first amendment right.
2:08

Lyman: Running someone over with a car is a crime. That’s what Renee Good did. She accelerated. Sellers: Should they still be alive? Lyman: Of course, I wish they did not put themselves in this position. Running someone over with your car is not a first amendment right.

Acyn

85,903 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

First Amendment “auditor” filming inside USPS. Karen loses her mind, starts smashing his camera like it owes her money. Result? Face full of pepper spray and instant regret. Word to the wise: This is EXACTLY the reaction these clowns bait for. Don’t engage.
0:27

First Amendment “auditor” filming inside USPS. Karen loses her mind, starts smashing his camera like it owes her money. Result? Face full of pepper spray and instant regret. Word to the wise: This is EXACTLY the reaction these clowns bait for. Don’t engage.

Kim "Katie" USA

155,657 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

👮‍♀️Officer Calls Three Units Over Sidewalk Filming👮‍♀️ She thinks recording in public is suspicious and standing up for 4th Amendment rights is being uncooperative. She also thinks illegal detainment with absolutely no crime is okay. What's your verdict? Is the cameraman a troublemaker? or Is she pushing it too far?
5:17

👮‍♀️Officer Calls Three Units Over Sidewalk Filming👮‍♀️ She thinks recording in public is suspicious and standing up for 4th Amendment rights is being uncooperative. She also thinks illegal detainment with absolutely no crime is okay. What's your verdict? Is the cameraman a troublemaker? or Is she pushing it too far?

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

41,976 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

👮‍♂️👮‍♂️Once Again Feelings Enforcement Police Show Up To Identify A Citizen Recording On A Public Sidewalk! The Homeland Security memo from 2010 says it's not illegal or suspicious to record exteriors of federal facilities. Therefore it cannot be deemed a crime. When police run your ID through their databases it is forever recorded. Your name is now documented. ❓Would you care if your name and information was entered into a "terrorist watch" database? I would.
9:46

👮‍♂️👮‍♂️Once Again Feelings Enforcement Police Show Up To Identify A Citizen Recording On A Public Sidewalk! The Homeland Security memo from 2010 says it's not illegal or suspicious to record exteriors of federal facilities. Therefore it cannot be deemed a crime. When police run your ID through their databases it is forever recorded. Your name is now documented. ❓Would you care if your name and information was entered into a "terrorist watch" database? I would.

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

29,491 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

INTERESTING: This man filming a store front on a public sidewalk gets confronted by the owner. The owner then pushes the camera and the man sprays him with pepper spray! The officer responds and issues citation to the store owner. Do you think that was the right move?
1:58

INTERESTING: This man filming a store front on a public sidewalk gets confronted by the owner. The owner then pushes the camera and the man sprays him with pepper spray! The officer responds and issues citation to the store owner. Do you think that was the right move?

AmericanPapaBear™

1,790,442 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hilarious cop helps defend guy recording. This man was recording a business from the sidewalk, and a woman and man were giving him a hard time. A nearby cop used his intercom to make them stop. The guy claiming to be a lawyer had to get a lesson from the cop, who crossed the street to talk to him. Is it annoying that people record? Yes, it can be. But it’s not illegal—it’s protected under the 1st Amendment.
2:01

Hilarious cop helps defend guy recording. This man was recording a business from the sidewalk, and a woman and man were giving him a hard time. A nearby cop used his intercom to make them stop. The guy claiming to be a lawyer had to get a lesson from the cop, who crossed the street to talk to him. Is it annoying that people record? Yes, it can be. But it’s not illegal—it’s protected under the 1st Amendment.

Suzee Q

56,124 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This officer pulled this guy over for speeding and now tried to pepper spray him because he said the guy was not cooperating with him.This officer tried to spray him,but was out of pepper spray because he has a history of spraying people with it all the time for no good reason!
1:19

This officer pulled this guy over for speeding and now tried to pepper spray him because he said the guy was not cooperating with him.This officer tried to spray him,but was out of pepper spray because he has a history of spraying people with it all the time for no good reason!

Suzie rizzio

809,335 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Messing with the guy who just got out of the gym, not a good idea
0:28

Messing with the guy who just got out of the gym, not a good idea

K.O. Fights

808,693 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

.travis kalanick on finding your business soulmate: "I like to say you go out on a date with an idea. Was it a good date? Did it go well? How did you and the idea get along? Who you are is going to be a big part of which idea works for you. [I call this] finding your sport or your business soulmate. If you're in touch with who you are then when the right idea comes your way you just know."
0:42

.travis kalanick on finding your business soulmate: "I like to say you go out on a date with an idea. Was it a good date? Did it go well? How did you and the idea get along? Who you are is going to be a big part of which idea works for you. [I call this] finding your sport or your business soulmate. If you're in touch with who you are then when the right idea comes your way you just know."

David Senra

18,236 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

"If you touch me, I'm touching you back, and I am in your way - you can't go this way. We can do this all day. I'm not scared of you, but you're the b*tch!" says a pro-Palestine protestor before aggressively declaring she is "peaceful" to a passer by while she and her friends are unlawfully denying his access to a public sidewalk. This radical protestor was filmed on Harvard Square, Cambridge Massachussetts, on July 12th 2025. Not only was the person filming not wearing any flags, colors or symbols whatsoever, he also did not initiate contact in any way with any of the protesters, nor did he speak to any of them and did not make any faces or gestures. He was merely present on a public sidewalk while filming and taking pictures, as is his right, and he was completely indistinguishable from the general public, but for the fact he is a known member of the local Jewish community. Amazingly, the Cambridge Police department did not clear the sidewalk for him but actually enabled the belligerent protestors.
2:41

"If you touch me, I'm touching you back, and I am in your way - you can't go this way. We can do this all day. I'm not scared of you, but you're the b*tch!" says a pro-Palestine protestor before aggressively declaring she is "peaceful" to a passer by while she and her friends are unlawfully denying his access to a public sidewalk. This radical protestor was filmed on Harvard Square, Cambridge Massachussetts, on July 12th 2025. Not only was the person filming not wearing any flags, colors or symbols whatsoever, he also did not initiate contact in any way with any of the protesters, nor did he speak to any of them and did not make any faces or gestures. He was merely present on a public sidewalk while filming and taking pictures, as is his right, and he was completely indistinguishable from the general public, but for the fact he is a known member of the local Jewish community. Amazingly, the Cambridge Police department did not clear the sidewalk for him but actually enabled the belligerent protestors.

Visegrád 24

235,496 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Kasparov: It's the first time, never thought it would happen in America. The government official threatened the public broadcaster with the confiscation of their license. The whole idea of debating what Jimmy Kimmel said is wrong because it's a First Amendment. 1/
0:25

Kasparov: It's the first time, never thought it would happen in America. The government official threatened the public broadcaster with the confiscation of their license. The whole idea of debating what Jimmy Kimmel said is wrong because it's a First Amendment. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

212,986 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: In Portland, an ICE agent, driving a blue car with no license plate, is seen pulling up to a U.S. citizen, yelling, “get out of here, bitch,” pepper spraying them, and driving away. Pepper spray is a use of force. Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement may only use force that is objectively reasonable under the circumstances. If someone is standing and filming… not threatening anyone, and not interfering… pepper spraying them is not justified under that standard. So, let’s call this what this is… An armed federal agent drove up to a U.S. citizen, called them a “bitch,” sprayed them with a chemical weapon, and drove away. If an ordinary person did that, they’d be arrested for assault. The moment officers believe they can attack people for exercising their constitutional rights, without consequences, is the moment they stop enforcing the law.
0:29

🚨BREAKING: In Portland, an ICE agent, driving a blue car with no license plate, is seen pulling up to a U.S. citizen, yelling, “get out of here, bitch,” pepper spraying them, and driving away. Pepper spray is a use of force. Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement may only use force that is objectively reasonable under the circumstances. If someone is standing and filming… not threatening anyone, and not interfering… pepper spraying them is not justified under that standard. So, let’s call this what this is… An armed federal agent drove up to a U.S. citizen, called them a “bitch,” sprayed them with a chemical weapon, and drove away. If an ordinary person did that, they’d be arrested for assault. The moment officers believe they can attack people for exercising their constitutional rights, without consequences, is the moment they stop enforcing the law.

Jesus Freakin Congress

167,627 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨BREAKING: In the Chicago suburbs, an ICE agent assaults a teenager for filming his vehicle, and pointing out that it illegally has no license plate. In the video, a U.S. citizen is peacefully filming an ICE vehicle, that is sitting in a parking lot. He walks to the back of the SUV to document that it has no license plate. That’s when the ICE agent jumps out, screaming, “Get away from my vehicle!” while aggressively charging toward the teenager. The teenager immediately backs away, but the ICE agent keeps walking at him, tries to trip the teenager , and continues yelling… even though neither of them are anywhere near the vehicle anymore. Filming government officials performing their duties, in public, is protected by the First Amendment. That protection doesn’t disappear just because the official doesn’t like being recorded. An officer also can’t lawfully use physical force simply because someone is filming them. Using force, to stop someone from recording, is a violation of that person’s constitutional rights. And let’s not ignore the reason the ICE agent got out of his car in the first place... Illinois law requires vehicles, driven on public roads, to display valid registration plates. This ICE vehicle is not following that law. So, if your first instinct, when someone records your conduct, is to assault them… you’re proving exactly why the public is recording in the first place.
0:23

🚨BREAKING: In the Chicago suburbs, an ICE agent assaults a teenager for filming his vehicle, and pointing out that it illegally has no license plate. In the video, a U.S. citizen is peacefully filming an ICE vehicle, that is sitting in a parking lot. He walks to the back of the SUV to document that it has no license plate. That’s when the ICE agent jumps out, screaming, “Get away from my vehicle!” while aggressively charging toward the teenager. The teenager immediately backs away, but the ICE agent keeps walking at him, tries to trip the teenager , and continues yelling… even though neither of them are anywhere near the vehicle anymore. Filming government officials performing their duties, in public, is protected by the First Amendment. That protection doesn’t disappear just because the official doesn’t like being recorded. An officer also can’t lawfully use physical force simply because someone is filming them. Using force, to stop someone from recording, is a violation of that person’s constitutional rights. And let’s not ignore the reason the ICE agent got out of his car in the first place... Illinois law requires vehicles, driven on public roads, to display valid registration plates. This ICE vehicle is not following that law. So, if your first instinct, when someone records your conduct, is to assault them… you’re proving exactly why the public is recording in the first place.

Jesus Freakin Congress

6,961,596 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 DOJ memo: Filming ICE = “domestic terrorism”? Unconstitutional. Filming federal agents in public is a First Amendment right. We will not be silenced. We will film. We protect each other. Support the launch: 📱 💸
1:36

🚨 DOJ memo: Filming ICE = “domestic terrorism”? Unconstitutional. Filming federal agents in public is a First Amendment right. We will not be silenced. We will film. We protect each other. Support the launch: 📱 💸

Joe Walsh

33,645 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten