Absolutely excellent analysis this one. You can so easily see who’s played football and who hasn’t, when hearing their opinions on this specific scenario. Jota didn’t dive and was impeded.

Some people clearly have never played football or contact sport before. When you’re running at full speed and any slight knock will take you down. He has an open net it’s obvious dubravkas elbow caused him to fall and his balance on a soaking wet pitch too ffs its pen end off

You know

Quite simple really. If there is no contact he scores that and we all move on with our day If there is contact (there is), don’t matter if he goes down or not it should be a pen but he knows he has to go down to get it

Terrible analysis I'm a LFC fan and its so obvious Jota dived. He took 2 steps after the contact then decided to drop to the ground.

Wow you scousers are unbelievable 😂😂 ‘ Golden Era’ aswell.

Is this why he throws his other("not impeded") foot 1st? While being able to perfectly step on the "impeded" one? It is you who never played ball if you think thats not a forgotten delayed dive. He felt something touching him, couldnt decide right then and did it horribly.

A foul in the box is a penalty. If a player is clipped and put off his stride that is enough to impede. Players go down because they know refs won't otherwise give the foul

1st thing we need to do is define dive. Every prem league player dives if what we mean is exaggerate the impact and make the fall more dramatic. For me a dive is when there is no contact and there is simulation of contact. So this is not a dive. depends how u define it tho.

It’s a dive… we all watch football, most of us have played football.. we don’t need some nerd to try and convince us otherwise … Liverpool benefited from a terrible and biased refree decision.. it is what it is, let’s move on lol