正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Absolutely NEXT LEVEL mega COLLAB going down on T-Pain ‘s BASS BOOT CAMP‼️👀🔥🫢🔒 DJ Diesel x T-Pain x Kyle from Kompany Samplifire x NGHTMRE x San Holo ↑% ⚠️ ‼️👀🫢🔥 Is THIS the song of the SUMMER⁉️🫢 bassbootcamp
27,659 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
9 条评论
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp @UglyBlunt_
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp Omg???!
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp This is the one , i want .. i neeed !!!! Asap
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp Genuinely what is the point of a “mega collab”
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp is Shaq not way taller than Kompany
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp Wait why is San holo and nightmare there?????
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp FAAAAAK
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp That's actually sick icl
@TPAIN @djdiesel @Kompanymusic @Samplifire @NGHTMRE @sanholobeats @bassbootcamp I uhhh .. ummm.. did .. uh okay maybe
相关视频
![Lecture 2 of our Physics-Informed Neural Networks mini-series. In Lecture 1 we made the idea visible...a neural network isn’t predicting a PDE solution, it is the candidate function uᵩ(x,t), and the PDE residual rᵩ(x,t) is the leash that keeps it honest. Now the natural question follows: How can a neural network be punished for breaking a PDE when nobody ever handed it the true solution, and the equation itself contains derivatives like uᵩₜₜ and uᵩₓₓ? Here’s the satisfying answer: A PINN doesn’t need the true answer to be corrected. It only needs a way to measure how wrong it is according to the PDE! The network outputs uᵩ(x,t). A software called "autodiff" is used to compute the derivatives (uᵩₓ, uᵩₜ, uᵩₓₓ, …) exactly by applying the chain rule through the network. Those derivatives get dropped into the PDE to produce rᵩ(x,t). If rᵩ is big at some point, the loss spikes there, and gradient descent pushes the parameters so that rᵩ shrinks. The math breakdown We want a function u(x,t) that satisfies a PDE on a domain Ω. In this lecture we keep a concrete nonlinear example in mind, the damped sine-Gordon equation uₜₜ(x,t) + γ uₜ(x,t) − c² uₓₓ(x,t) + sin(u(x,t)) = 0. A PINN replaces the unknown function u with a neural network uᵩ(x,t), where ᵩ means all the network parameters (weights and biases). Now we build the physics residual by plugging uᵩ into the PDE rᵩ(x,t) = uᵩₜₜ(x,t) + γ uᵩₜ(x,t) − c² uᵩₓₓ(x,t) + sin(uᵩ(x,t)). If uᵩ were a true solution, rᵩ would be 0 everywhere. So we sample points (xⱼ,tⱼ) inside the domain. These are collocation points. At each one we evaluate rᵩ, and we define a physics loss L_phys(ᵩ) = meanⱼ |rᵩ(xⱼ,tⱼ)|². This is the punishment mechanism. (Punish just means: if |rᵩ| is big, L_phys is big; training updates ᵩ to make L_phys smaller. Reward means the loss drops, so those parameter changes are kept.) The key question was where the derivatives come from. Since uᵩ is built out of differentiable operations, we can compute uᵩₜ(x,t), uᵩₜₜ(x,t), uᵩₓ(x,t), uᵩₓₓ(x,t), at any input (x,t) we choose. Imagine a simple differentiable model written as a sum of nonlinear features uᵩ(x,t) = Σₖ vₖ σ( wₖx x + wₖt t + bₖ ) + b₀. Then the derivatives are just chain rule uᵩₓ(x,t) = Σₖ vₖ σ′(·) wₖx uᵩₓₓ(x,t) = Σₖ vₖ σ″(·) (wₖx)² uᵩₜ(x,t) = Σₖ vₖ σ′(·) wₖt uᵩₜₜ(x,t) = Σₖ vₖ σ″(·) (wₖt)². So rᵩ(x,t) is an explicit computable number at every (x,t). For the damped sine-Gordon example, it’s the same story, just with one extra nonlinear term: rᵩ(x,t) = [uᵩₜₜ(x,t) + γ uᵩₜ(x,t) − c² uᵩₓₓ(x,t)] + sin(uᵩ(x,t)). A real PINN is a deeper composition of these same building blocks, but it’s still just a chain rule, and autodiff is the machinery that does that bookkeeping reliably for big graphs. Then we train by gradient descent on the total loss. Even if we use only physics for the moment, the update is conceptually just ᵩ ← ᵩ − η ∇ᵩ L_phys(ᵩ), with learning rate η. In practice we also include initial/boundary conditions or data, because PDEs aren’t uniquely determined without them L(ᵩ) = L_data(ᵩ) + λ L_phys(ᵩ) + L_bc/ic(ᵩ), where L_bc/ic(ᵩ) enforces things like uᵩ(x,0) ≈ u₀(x) and uᵩₜ(x,0) ≈ v₀(x), or boundary conditions at x = ±L. So Lecture 2’s punchline is simple: the PDE becomes a training signal. We keep differentiating uᵩ, measuring rᵩ, and updating ᵩ until the residual goes quiet across Ω. #PINNs #PhysicsInformedNeuralNetworks #ScientificMachineLearning #AutoDiff #Backpropagation #PDE #DifferentialEquations #Optimization #MachineLearning #AppliedMath #ComputationalPhysics](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2009748938266685482/amplify_video_thumb/2009748619386101760/img/q0u_ZxmvYMtDl2eQ.jpg)
Sensitive content
DeenTheGreat CRASHED OUT on his cameraman after he FORGOT to MUTE his mic when he was in the MIDDLE of having s*x 👀😳 “I ain’t gonna lie at this point this sh*t personal n*gga”
Frxmzy🔪
461,391 次观看 • 4 个月前
