Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

According to BBC More or Less, the false claim originated on social media via screenshots of a press release posted the day before the review was published 👇

13,236 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Sex Matters's profile picture
Sex Matters2 years ago

A useful thread on misinformation surrounding the #CassReview. A quick look at who is spreading the misinformation 🧵

Sex Matters's profile picture
Sex Matters2 years ago

This misinformation was then repeated in the House of Commons by @UKLabour MP @DawnButlerBrent. We call on her to raise a point of order to urgently correct the record.

Sex Matters's profile picture
Sex Matters2 years ago

The claim was also made by @scottishgreens MSP @Ross_Greer to @Sarah_Montague on @BBCWorldatOne 👇

Sex Matters's profile picture
Sex Matters2 years ago

The @scottishgreens co-leader & @scotgov minister, @patrickharvie MSP, makes a similar argument on @BBCScotland ⤵️

Sex Matters's profile picture
Sex Matters2 years ago

And @patrickharvie on @BBCr4today refusing to acknowledge the findings of the report ⤵️

Sex Matters's profile picture
Sex Matters2 years ago

Many of these politicians have spoken against the “politicisation” of the report, yet continue to spread misinformation about the methodology of the #CassReview.

Sex Matters's profile picture
Sex Matters2 years ago

Well done and thank you @DawnButlerBrent for correcting the Parliamentary record. It's concerning that this misinformation came from @stonewalluk: "...by quoting this briefing, it seems as though I may have inadvertently misled the House"

Sex Matters's profile picture
Sex Matters2 years ago

@stonewalluk

Barbara Higham's profile picture
Barbara Higham2 years ago

@BBCMoreOrLess How any woman could now vote Labour knowing that they have been briefed by Stonewall is incredible. #LabourLosingWomen

Related Videos