Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

According to Kuture, they were briefed before they started shooting that if HMs don’t speak, they won’t show them. So some people started saying what they were not supposed to say. He said he didn’t speak cause they didn’t ask him question directly and they are saving the best...

23,557 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfĂźgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Andrew Neil CLASHED with Labour MP Chris Curtis on Newsnight over taxpayer-funded security for Harry and Meghan, and said what most of the country thinks: “I didn’t ask them to come back to Britain, did you? The British people didn’t ask them to come back to Britain. They don’t have to be in Britain. We don’t really know why they are in Britain.” He then set out a straightforward position: “Of course if there is any intelligence that leads to a threat to them, they will be alerted, and then they could get some protection if it was specific. But in general I think they should pay for their own security as anybody else has to.” That is entirely reasonable. The taxpayer should not be forced to fund security for two people who walked away from the Royal Family and the country, insisting they wanted to be private citizens. They got what they asked for, and many were happy to see the back of them. Now they are back and pressing for the security they were previously denied. We have already been through this, and the decision was that they should not receive it. Curtis immediately tried to misrepresent the point: “They can decide where they live. They’re British citizens. They have as much right to be in Britain as you or I do.” Andrew Neil put him right at once: “I didn’t say they had no right. I just said they don’t have a right for us to pay.” Curtis argued that these decisions are not about popularity or status, but purely about risk: “I don’t know if there is a risk, but if there is then obviously the British state has a responsibility to keep them safe and give them the security that they need.” Neil’s reply was simple: “Sure. But if there’s not a risk, then they don’t.” Which is exactly what he said at the start.

J Stewart

127,619 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen