正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

According to rumor reports or alleged speculation regarding alleged allegations in a conference held in the Megan Pete v Grifter civil case that there is a deposition or alleged questions that Defendant lawyers would like to ask Kelsey Harris regarding her rent being paid for a year by her...

20,861 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🎙️| Back on Feb. 23, 2022 #Akademiks went online and posted some tweets that was rumored to be given to him to put out misinformation regarding Tory Lanez DNA not being on the weapon.. that allegedly according to testimony was used to sh^^t #Megantheestallion. Megan that same day responded & debunked in her ig story WHST AKADEMIKS reported on a day of Pre Hearing where court was NOT held that day and was rescheduled to April allegedly . Also in this very day #MilagroGramz Tok to her twitter to also repost what AKADEMIKS posted amongst other things that were unfairly , bias’s misinformation that was #imo maliciously intentional to push a negative narrative . Not only did Milagro go on twitter the same day she went in her Stationhead to say that a her and AKADEMIKS has the SAME “SOURCE” . She also tells her audience that she had been giving them HINTS about what was going to be revealed before courts meaning the tweet AKADEMIKS posted to give out misinformation to sway the public of the facts. Milagro ,also goes on to say when was told that journalist allegedly said that the misinformation that was posted by AKADEMIKS and her were not a fact she goes on to say she does not care what they are saying #allegedly SN: The reason for this post wit audio of Milagro admitting to directly to her audience of knowing about this form that was going to be shared and to point out that she had sources and speaks of it many times and says she’s going to call her source and she will return to give more information to her audience . It is also to show how malicious Milagro is with the overkill of attacking Megan Pete and to push narratives of misinformation during the trial and after . Even with debunking the misinformation knowingly < keyword with the court paperwork with lawyers debunking about the allegations regarding the DNA stop currently Milagro continues to push a lie to the public and manipulating the public #imo to think she’s only posing questions when she has admitted that she does not care . I want this post audio SHARED LIKED COMMENTS PLEASE SHARE THE AUDIOS NEED TO BE SHARED

OPINIONATED_TRUTHS_PODCAST™️

12,379 次观看 • 1 年前

BAIL DENIED AGAIN | The State has successfully opposed a bail application based on alleged new facts brought by Janitha van Reenen Coetzee (25) in the Vanderbijlpark Magistrate's Court. Coetzee faces a charge of fraud involving approximately R424 000 allegedly defrauded from the Emfuleni Local Municipality. It is alleged that the accused misrepresented herself as an independent agent capable of assisting residents in obtaining discounts on outstanding municipal accounts. Victims allegedly paid her money to make discounted payments to the municipality on their behalf. However, the funds were allegedly never paid over to the municipality. The accused also allegedly submitted claims to the municipality on behalf of the victims. It is further alleged that the municipality paid approximately R424 000 to the accused, which was never paid to the intended beneficiaries. The alleged fraud was uncovered when the then Chief Financial Officer of Emfuleni Local Municipality, Martha Mani Rantsofu, who has since passed away, identified suspicious claims amounting to approximately R424 000 and reported the matter to her manager. Following an internal investigation, the municipality reported the matter to the South African Police Service for further investigation. During the bail proceedings, the State, represented by Prosecutor Moses Raditsela, opposed the application and argued that the accused posed a flight risk because her residential address could not be properly verified due to inconsistencies regarding her place of residence. The State further submitted that no genuine new facts had been presented to the court, as the issues raised had already been considered and addressed during the previous bail application. It argued that releasing the accused on bail would not be in the interests of justice. In delivering judgment, Magistrate Mamburu agreed with the State's submissions and found that the information presented by the accused did not constitute new facts. The court further held that it would not be in the interests of justice to release the accused on bail. Consequently, the bail application based on new facts was dismissed. The matter was postponed to 23 July 2026 for further investigation. 📹: Silindelo Sebata

Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

12,137 次观看 • 6 天前