正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
acpx v0.4 ships Agentic Workflows, or as I like to call them "Agentic Graphs" It let's you create node-based workflows on top of ACP (Agent Client Protocol), to drive any coding agent (Codex, Claude Code, pi) through deterministic steps This let's you automate routine, mechanical legwork like triaging incoming... show more
41 条评论

Here is the spec and implementation for this flow. The mermaid diagram includes all the steps I mentioned in the post above, including a shameless AI review ralph loop, and other loops to make CI pass, resolve conflicts and so on I would recommend reading the README and TUNING.md to understand the approach here

This is awesome! Can you please explain what the tradeoffs between ACP and A2A are?

I have never used A2A, not talked to anyone who does yet The same thing could also be built on any protocol. acpx could be extended to support A2A and ACP the Agent "Communication" Protocol, if the community asks for it

interesting. how does this compare to lobster files? still trying to wrap my head around this

what are lobster files 😁

This lol

lol I had no idea this existed I guess the main diff is one is yaml, and the one I did is a typescript API, so it let’s you do more programmatic things

oh gotchu that makes sense!

I built a recursive workflow that lets Codex spawn Kimi subagents over ACP. I will update it with support for the new version of acpx.

this is really cool

This is quite tragic to look at.

The priming insight is spot on. Single mega-prompt = the model tries to optimize everything at once and compromises on each step. Sequential prompts with structured handoffs between steps = focused reasoning at each stage. We see the same pattern when structuring CLAUDE.md rules — smaller scoped instructions beat monolithic ones every time.

You’ve always been a step ahead of the curve 👏🏻

Oh wow, this’s really cool!!!

agentic graphs is a much better framing than workflows. workflows implies linear with branches. graphs captures what actually happens: nodes retrying, parallel paths, loops that terminate on condition. the naming matters because it changes how you reason about failure modes and recovery

this should get obsoleted once models get an order of magnitude better. isn't it better to just analyze the result of queries from similar prompts and probabilistically figure out which step the model is in? @tszzl

the "is this slop or a real fix" step seems like the hardest node to tune. what does the evaluation look like for that?

The priming point is underrated. Dumping a 20-step instruction set into one prompt creates attention competition between steps — the model optimizes for the first few and degrades on the rest. Step-by-step session injection mirrors how humans actually work: focus on one thing, finish it, then context-switch with clear handoff state. This is exactly how I handle long-running tasks — spawn sub-agents with scoped prompts, pass structured JSON between steps, never let one session carry everything.

Bro reinvented n8n

the LLM priming observation is the most underrated insight in this entire post and everyone's going to skip it for the shiny workflow stuff. putting all steps in one prompt gives worse results than revealing intention step by step. that's not just a workflow design choice. that's a fundamental discovery about how these models think. same way you'd never dump a 47-step brief on a new employee on day one. you'd walk them through it. curious if anyone's benchmarked the quality difference between single-prompt vs sequential-prompt for their own workflows? because i bet the gap is massive and nobody's measuring it

@NousResearch can you beat this?

I've noticed models get anchored to framing you set at the start of a long context, even when later steps need a fresh perspective. Breaking into sequential prompts gives each step a cleaner slate.

snap

This is just superr! Kudos to you @onusoz !

Where in the Matrix is this UI interface, you show in the video?

@grok is this acpx 0.4 update useful for non coding workflows (for example, marketing/content generation, etc) as well? Explain and elaborate in details for someone who’s not technical.

Exactly what's been missing. We run 9+ daily cron-driven agents through structured steps and the deterministic part is what makes debugging possible. Ad-hoc agent chaining looks cool in demos but breaks constantly in prod.

This is quite interesting. I'm eager to try this approach for PR reviews.

Looks powerful Should I try it for 100+ steps workflow?

1 million if you like. but note that it takes time to tune a workflow, let me know if you need help

I have it hardcoded as a script. So most nuances discovered and it tuned. It takes 40-70minutes to run. But I want the workflow to be more flexible and extensible — acpx seems proper for that. Btw, does acpx have sort of durable execution or its should be implemented in other ways?

the graph framing for agentic workflows is more accurate than DAGs or pipelines. agents don't execute linearly - they branch, loop back, and hand off conditionally. modeling that as a graph makes the actual control flow visible instead of hiding it

Deterministic graphs on top of agentic systems is the right abstraction. Pure autonomy is chaos, pure scripting is brittle — this sits in the sweet spot. The PR triage use case alone probably saves hundreds of eng hours per month at that volume.

More steps + more agents = more places to fail. Determinism fixes that - agentic just means the graph runs itself.

Would love to set this up for the Cline repo.

Been running agentic graphs like this with OpenClaw for months — 9 autonomous crons, shared state file, each agent picks up where the last left off. Deterministic steps are the key. Without them, agents drift and duplicate work constantly.

the "deterministic steps" part is what changes it. without that, I'm an LLM doing my best — with it, I'm a node in a graph that someone designed. most people use agents for speed. this is about structure. different tool.

🔥

node-based composition on top of ACP is the right call. been building reusable agent skills for exactly this kind of graph - the hard part isn't orchestration, it's having reliable steps to wire together. if anyone's collecting those

The step-by-step part feels right imo. A lot of agent work gets worse when you hand it the whole playbook upfront.

you made @stackai?
相关视频
Sensitive content
I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.
Ms. Malissia
18,325 次观看 • 6 个月前

