Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Actually, no, it's not. In the original codebase, Rise and MegaETH were using a different measurement than the other chains, unfairly giving them the advantage. I've updated the codebase to equalize all the chains (including Solana, which was also being treated unfairly).
66,467 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
8 Comments
PR with my code changes is here:
DeFi’s momentum is just getting started. BTC staking is poised to become a $12B industry by 2025. Ethereum L2s are proving their profitability with skyrocketing gains. AI-powered tools are redefining the way trades are executed. The future belongs to those who stay ahead of the curve. What’s your top pick for the next big leap in DeFi?
I love the sonic community but unfortunately this is incorrect. You have misunderstand the eth_sendRawTransactionSync method, and the equivalent method for mega
you removed the transaction receipt from the code? of course it’s faster now. it's wrong.
shout out @paintoshi @0xDoubleSharp
$S
The best part, it's on mainnet and rest are testnets except for Solana
@SonicLabs There it is, I knew that this test was bullshit when the time @SonicLabs got in the original test. Great work @0xseg for straightening it all out and showing the true results 👍
![.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2056561012921471241/amplify_video_thumb/2056560945489465344/img/WImukXIGuOvKPqeT.jpg)
![GR 💬 : [The front wing closing in two different stages] was not intential and it's not an advantage for sure. It's actually a problem, that we're trying to solve.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2037077995089694794/ext_tw_video_thumb/2037077890546675712/pu/img/vzwTXdUj4Q07T88Q.jpg)
