Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

#AdaniEmbraer: A Geopolitical Masterstroke While China builds COMAC, we've been dependent on Boeing/Airbus duopoly. Today's world? Supply chains = sovereignty. Fundamental Investor partnering with Brazil (fellow democracy, BRICS ally) isn't coincidence—it's strategic brilliance. India-Brazil aerospace corridor challenges Western monopoly. This is soft power + hard economics. #AatmanirbharBharat #MakeInIndia

🚩😍अंगराज😍🚩

22,808 subscribers

30,108 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨BRICS SUMMIT 2023🚨 {1/3} ✅ IN LESS THAN 24 HOURS EVERYTHING CHANGES FOR THE UNITED STATES ✅ THE DE-DOLLARIZATION MOMENT MIGHT FINALLY BE HERE ✅ A GOLD-BACKED CURRENCY THAT STANDS AS THE BACKBONE OF A NEW BRICS CURRENCY IS BEING ROLLED OUT IN EARNEST ‼️In 24 hours, Putin and China will change everything. Yes, tomorrow, a BRICS lightning bolt will shock the Western hegemony that's been ruling the world for decades. Western media is totally ignoring the story, by the way, because they don't want to admit what's about to happen. Goldman Sachs, though, understands it, and they believe that by the year 2050, the BRICS nations will dominate the global economy. So on Tuesday, yes, tomorrow, the BRICS summit officially kicks off in South Africa. This is the first face-to-face BRICS summit since the start of COVID, and we are about to witness a rebalancing of the world order. ‼️The agenda items at this summit are massive: 💥The currency, yes, a new currency, trade, military cooperation, AI, microchips, oil, all of it, infrastructure, rail lines, shipping. This is a big, big deal. And the United States, I guess, didn't get an invitation. The British didn't get an invitation. Germany isn't welcome. Is the game over for the Western hegemony? Well, the writing is on the wall. Now, for those of you that don't know, BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. And it started out small, over a decade ago, and now it's become the greatest threat to Western power that we've ever seen. And I'm not talking about military power here, which we'll get to in a second. I'm actually talking about economic power, oil power, computer power, trade power, the greatest weapons of all, not those bombs. 💥Now the top of the agenda is the United States dollar, squarely in the crosshairs. Here's how Foreign Policy magazine headlines this moment, a BRICS currency could shake the dollar's dominance. The de-dollarization moment might finally be here. Really? Is it true? After all, talk of getting rid of the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency goes back to the 1960s. Here's the New York Times, in 1968, talking about France trying to separate itself from the U.S. dollar. Yes, French President Charles de Gaulle versus Lyndon Johnson. That's how old this is. That's how far back this goes. This isn't new at all. But now we are at a tipping point. Brazil's president, Lula da Silva, says that every night he asks himself why all of these countries have to base their trade on the U.S. dollar. Can you imagine every night before going to bed, that's the thought that you have? And what he does? Well, now they don't. A gold-backed currency that stands as the backbone of a new BRICS currency is being rolled out in earnest. Brazil, Russia, China, India, South Africa, trading oil, computer chips, minerals and settling those transactions in a reserve currency that has nothing to do with the U.S. dollar. All of the previous meetings of these BRICS nations have been leading up to this moment in South Africa. BRICS countries are home to more than 3.2 billion people, around 40% of the global population. None of the bloc's members is in the G7, the group of seven advanced economies. To increase its influence, BRICS is considering bringing new members into the fold. Just look at the trade between the BRICS nations. There's a massive financial surplus. The BRICS nations have a trade surplus. Brazil just hit a record trade surplus. So why would they want to settle these transactions with U.S. dollars? Doesn't make any sense. Meanwhile, Europe's trade deficit has hit a new record, nearly $500 billion trade deficit. Which side would you rather be on? Of course, this isn't happening overnight and there are big impediments to a BRICS currency. The biggest issue right now is that if Russia wants to import things from other countries that are not named China, they'll likely have to settle it in U.S. dollars if they want to import those items

🚨BRICS SUMMIT 2023🚨 {1/3} ✅ IN LESS THAN 24 HOURS EVERYTHING CHANGES FOR THE UNITED STATES ✅ THE DE-DOLLARIZATION MOMENT MIGHT FINALLY BE HERE ✅ A GOLD-BACKED CURRENCY THAT STANDS AS THE BACKBONE OF A NEW BRICS CURRENCY IS BEING ROLLED OUT IN EARNEST ‼️In 24 hours, Putin and China will change everything. Yes, tomorrow, a BRICS lightning bolt will shock the Western hegemony that's been ruling the world for decades. Western media is totally ignoring the story, by the way, because they don't want to admit what's about to happen. Goldman Sachs, though, understands it, and they believe that by the year 2050, the BRICS nations will dominate the global economy. So on Tuesday, yes, tomorrow, the BRICS summit officially kicks off in South Africa. This is the first face-to-face BRICS summit since the start of COVID, and we are about to witness a rebalancing of the world order. ‼️The agenda items at this summit are massive: 💥The currency, yes, a new currency, trade, military cooperation, AI, microchips, oil, all of it, infrastructure, rail lines, shipping. This is a big, big deal. And the United States, I guess, didn't get an invitation. The British didn't get an invitation. Germany isn't welcome. Is the game over for the Western hegemony? Well, the writing is on the wall. Now, for those of you that don't know, BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. And it started out small, over a decade ago, and now it's become the greatest threat to Western power that we've ever seen. And I'm not talking about military power here, which we'll get to in a second. I'm actually talking about economic power, oil power, computer power, trade power, the greatest weapons of all, not those bombs. 💥Now the top of the agenda is the United States dollar, squarely in the crosshairs. Here's how Foreign Policy magazine headlines this moment, a BRICS currency could shake the dollar's dominance. The de-dollarization moment might finally be here. Really? Is it true? After all, talk of getting rid of the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency goes back to the 1960s. Here's the New York Times, in 1968, talking about France trying to separate itself from the U.S. dollar. Yes, French President Charles de Gaulle versus Lyndon Johnson. That's how old this is. That's how far back this goes. This isn't new at all. But now we are at a tipping point. Brazil's president, Lula da Silva, says that every night he asks himself why all of these countries have to base their trade on the U.S. dollar. Can you imagine every night before going to bed, that's the thought that you have? And what he does? Well, now they don't. A gold-backed currency that stands as the backbone of a new BRICS currency is being rolled out in earnest. Brazil, Russia, China, India, South Africa, trading oil, computer chips, minerals and settling those transactions in a reserve currency that has nothing to do with the U.S. dollar. All of the previous meetings of these BRICS nations have been leading up to this moment in South Africa. BRICS countries are home to more than 3.2 billion people, around 40% of the global population. None of the bloc's members is in the G7, the group of seven advanced economies. To increase its influence, BRICS is considering bringing new members into the fold. Just look at the trade between the BRICS nations. There's a massive financial surplus. The BRICS nations have a trade surplus. Brazil just hit a record trade surplus. So why would they want to settle these transactions with U.S. dollars? Doesn't make any sense. Meanwhile, Europe's trade deficit has hit a new record, nearly $500 billion trade deficit. Which side would you rather be on? Of course, this isn't happening overnight and there are big impediments to a BRICS currency. The biggest issue right now is that if Russia wants to import things from other countries that are not named China, they'll likely have to settle it in U.S. dollars if they want to import those items

{Matt} $XRPatriot

478,236 просмотров • 3 лет назад

#AdaniEmbraer Adani-Embraer Landmark Aviation Partnership Adani Defence & Aerospace and Brazilian aerospace giant Embraer signed a historic Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) at the Ministry of Civil Aviation. This partnership aims to establish India's first private-sector Final Assembly Line (FAL) for regional transport aircraft, specifically targeting the 70–146 seat segment. The collaboration is designed to build a "world-class aviation ecosystem" rather than just a standalone manufacturing plant. The focus areas include: •Final Assembly Line (FAL): Setting up a facility to assemble Embraer’s regional jets (E-Jets family) on Indian soil. •Indigenization: A phased increase in local manufacturing of parts and components. •Value-Chain Integration: Leveraging Adani’s existing footprint in airport infrastructure, MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) services, and pilot training. •Supply Chain Development: Establishing a robust domestic network of suppliers to support global aerospace programs. Jeet Adani, Director (Adani Defence & Aerospace / Adani Airport Holdings) Jeet Adani characterized the agreement as a "vision taking flight," emphasizing its alignment with the national mission of Atmanirbhar Bharat. "It represents India's determination to build world-class aviation capabilities on our own soil. This project will redefine the future of aviation in our country." Arjan Meijer, President & CEO (Embraer Commercial Aviation) Meijer highlighted India as a "pivotal market," projecting a demand for at least 500 aircraft in the regional jet category over the next 20 years. He noted that the partnership combines Embraer's engineering excellence with Adani’s industrial scale. •Regional Connectivity (UDAN): The partnership directly supports the government's UDAN scheme by providing cost-effective aircraft suited for Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. •Bilateral Ties: The deal strengthens strategic relations between India and Brazil, fostering technological and industrial cooperation. •Employment: The project is expected to generate high-skilled employment and move India up the global aerospace value chain. •Market Positioning: Currently, approximately 50 Embraer aircraft (commercial, defense, and business) operate in India. This move positions Embraer to compete more effectively with the duopoly of Airbus and Boeing by offering locally assembled alternatives. •Location: While not yet finalized, Jeet Adani confirmed that a couple of sites are under evaluation, with a final decision expected within the next two months. •First Rollout: Government officials suggested that the first aircraft could potentially roll out of the Indian facility within the next five years. •Investment: Specific financial figures remain confidential, but the scale is described as a multi-billion dollar commitment to India's aerospace infrastructure. Source Highlights: •MoU signed in the presence of Civil Aviation Minister K Rammohan Naidu and Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh. •Aligns with the 'Make in India' initiative to reduce import dependence.

#AdaniEmbraer Adani-Embraer Landmark Aviation Partnership Adani Defence & Aerospace and Brazilian aerospace giant Embraer signed a historic Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) at the Ministry of Civil Aviation. This partnership aims to establish India's first private-sector Final Assembly Line (FAL) for regional transport aircraft, specifically targeting the 70–146 seat segment. The collaboration is designed to build a "world-class aviation ecosystem" rather than just a standalone manufacturing plant. The focus areas include: •Final Assembly Line (FAL): Setting up a facility to assemble Embraer’s regional jets (E-Jets family) on Indian soil. •Indigenization: A phased increase in local manufacturing of parts and components. •Value-Chain Integration: Leveraging Adani’s existing footprint in airport infrastructure, MRO (Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul) services, and pilot training. •Supply Chain Development: Establishing a robust domestic network of suppliers to support global aerospace programs. Jeet Adani, Director (Adani Defence & Aerospace / Adani Airport Holdings) Jeet Adani characterized the agreement as a "vision taking flight," emphasizing its alignment with the national mission of Atmanirbhar Bharat. "It represents India's determination to build world-class aviation capabilities on our own soil. This project will redefine the future of aviation in our country." Arjan Meijer, President & CEO (Embraer Commercial Aviation) Meijer highlighted India as a "pivotal market," projecting a demand for at least 500 aircraft in the regional jet category over the next 20 years. He noted that the partnership combines Embraer's engineering excellence with Adani’s industrial scale. •Regional Connectivity (UDAN): The partnership directly supports the government's UDAN scheme by providing cost-effective aircraft suited for Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities. •Bilateral Ties: The deal strengthens strategic relations between India and Brazil, fostering technological and industrial cooperation. •Employment: The project is expected to generate high-skilled employment and move India up the global aerospace value chain. •Market Positioning: Currently, approximately 50 Embraer aircraft (commercial, defense, and business) operate in India. This move positions Embraer to compete more effectively with the duopoly of Airbus and Boeing by offering locally assembled alternatives. •Location: While not yet finalized, Jeet Adani confirmed that a couple of sites are under evaluation, with a final decision expected within the next two months. •First Rollout: Government officials suggested that the first aircraft could potentially roll out of the Indian facility within the next five years. •Investment: Specific financial figures remain confidential, but the scale is described as a multi-billion dollar commitment to India's aerospace infrastructure. Source Highlights: •MoU signed in the presence of Civil Aviation Minister K Rammohan Naidu and Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh. •Aligns with the 'Make in India' initiative to reduce import dependence.

Sheetal Chopra 🇮🇳

173,233 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

India Ups Game For ‘UNSC Veto Club’ Brazil, Germany, Japan Join Forces Amid China, Pakistan Bluster India has launched its ninth UNSC campaign but a seat was never the real goal. Why has New Delhi agreed to wait 15 years for veto power it hasn't even won? Why is it rejecting a seat that's reportedly on offer? And who's still standing in the way? India and its G4 partners Brazil, Germany, and Japan have intensified their joint campaign to secure permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), offering a flexible proposal to defer their veto power for 15 years to break the current diplomatic deadlock. This strategic move is designed to call the bluff of opposing factions while directly countering intense geopolitical resistance from the "Coffee Club" alliance, spearheaded by Pakistan and China. To dismantle arguments that an expanded "veto club" would paralyse UN decision-making, India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, advocated for a unified G4 model: 🔴 New permanent members would legally hold veto status but agree not to exercise it for 15 years pending a review. 🔴 India firmly rejected Western proposals to create a permanent category completely stripped of veto rights, warning that it would institutionalise inequality. 🔴 The G4 model proposes expanding the UNSC from 15 to 25–26 members, adding 6 new permanent seats. Geopolitical Gridlock: The Bluster and OppositionThe push for a reformed multilateral world order faces fierce resistance from entrenched regional rivals: 🔴 Formally known as the Uniting for Consensus (UfC) group which includes Pakistan, Italy, and Argentina this coalition aggressively campaigns to expand only non-permanent, rotating seats to specifically block India and its allies. 🔴 China continues to use its existing veto power as a geopolitical shield, subtly offering to support India only if New Delhi drops its alliance with Japan a condition India has completely ignored. 🔴 While Russia openly backs permanent seats for India and Brazil, it strongly opposes Germany and Japan due to current alignments, attempting to break the G4's unity. Building the Global South Coalition 🔴 Recognising that reforms require a two-thirds majority in the UN General Assembly, India is strategically aligning its campaign with the wider Global South: 🔴 India actively champions the Ezulwini Consensus, demanding at least two permanent seats with full veto rights for African nations. 🔴 India is pushing back against recent UN working papers that float "fixed regional seats", which would force India to perpetually rotate a seat with countries like Indonesia or Pakistan. 🔴 Despite the ongoing gridlock, India’s core claim continues to collect formal backing from four out of five permanent members (P5) the US, UK, France, and Russia. Credit : Times Axis.

India Ups Game For ‘UNSC Veto Club’ Brazil, Germany, Japan Join Forces Amid China, Pakistan Bluster India has launched its ninth UNSC campaign but a seat was never the real goal. Why has New Delhi agreed to wait 15 years for veto power it hasn't even won? Why is it rejecting a seat that's reportedly on offer? And who's still standing in the way? India and its G4 partners Brazil, Germany, and Japan have intensified their joint campaign to secure permanent seats on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), offering a flexible proposal to defer their veto power for 15 years to break the current diplomatic deadlock. This strategic move is designed to call the bluff of opposing factions while directly countering intense geopolitical resistance from the "Coffee Club" alliance, spearheaded by Pakistan and China. To dismantle arguments that an expanded "veto club" would paralyse UN decision-making, India’s Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, advocated for a unified G4 model: 🔴 New permanent members would legally hold veto status but agree not to exercise it for 15 years pending a review. 🔴 India firmly rejected Western proposals to create a permanent category completely stripped of veto rights, warning that it would institutionalise inequality. 🔴 The G4 model proposes expanding the UNSC from 15 to 25–26 members, adding 6 new permanent seats. Geopolitical Gridlock: The Bluster and OppositionThe push for a reformed multilateral world order faces fierce resistance from entrenched regional rivals: 🔴 Formally known as the Uniting for Consensus (UfC) group which includes Pakistan, Italy, and Argentina this coalition aggressively campaigns to expand only non-permanent, rotating seats to specifically block India and its allies. 🔴 China continues to use its existing veto power as a geopolitical shield, subtly offering to support India only if New Delhi drops its alliance with Japan a condition India has completely ignored. 🔴 While Russia openly backs permanent seats for India and Brazil, it strongly opposes Germany and Japan due to current alignments, attempting to break the G4's unity. Building the Global South Coalition 🔴 Recognising that reforms require a two-thirds majority in the UN General Assembly, India is strategically aligning its campaign with the wider Global South: 🔴 India actively champions the Ezulwini Consensus, demanding at least two permanent seats with full veto rights for African nations. 🔴 India is pushing back against recent UN working papers that float "fixed regional seats", which would force India to perpetually rotate a seat with countries like Indonesia or Pakistan. 🔴 Despite the ongoing gridlock, India’s core claim continues to collect formal backing from four out of five permanent members (P5) the US, UK, France, and Russia. Credit : Times Axis.

Augadh

57,468 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇨🇳🧵1/ China is quietly reshaping global trade. While the US plays tariff games, China is building a new kind of offshore trade model: 👉 Buy globally, sell globally — without the goods ever touching Chinese soil. What does that mean? Let’s break it down. 👇 2/ Traditional offshore trade looked like this: 🔹 Foreign buyers ordered from China. 🔹 Chinese companies exported domestic goods overseas. That’s “Made in China, sold globally.” But now, China wants to go one step further. 3/ The new model is different: Chinese companies set up offshore subsidiaries (in Singapore, UAE, Hong Kong, etc.) to: ✅ Purchase goods from any country ✅ Resell them to any other market 🌏 All without the goods passing through China. It’s global trade, orchestrated by Chinese firms. 4/ In other words: China isn’t just the world’s factory anymore. It’s becoming the world’s trading hub — a smart, fast, and connected middleman. From factory to broker. From made-in-China to managed-by-China. This is economic diplomacy at its sharpest. 5/ Why now? Because the world is fragmenting. 🔻 Tariffs. 🔻 Sanctions. 🔻 Supply chain insecurity. Instead of retreating, China is adapting: 👉 Decentralizing its trade architecture 👉 Spreading risk 👉 Creating flexibility outside US jurisdiction 6/ There’s also a long-term vision. If China can: ✅ Orchestrate supply chains ✅ Handle global payments ✅ Leverage its shipping & logistics strength Then it wins pricing power, data advantage, and strategic depth — even without selling a single Chinese-made product. 7/ This is also part of de-dollarization. Offshore trade hubs help promote: 🌐 Cross-border yuan settlement 💱 Currency diversification 💳 Less reliance on Western banking systems It’s soft power through smart trade design. 8/ So while some think China is isolated… it’s actually re-wiring global trade routes. China is future-proofing its role in the world economy by: 🔹 Building infrastructure 🔹 Controlling flows 🔹 Replacing confrontation with competition This is strategy, not reaction. 9/ Final thought: The age of “Made in China” is evolving into the age of “Traded by China.” That may be harder to sanction, harder to stop — and ultimately, harder to compete with. The world is changing. Watch carefully. 🌏

🇨🇳🧵1/ China is quietly reshaping global trade. While the US plays tariff games, China is building a new kind of offshore trade model: 👉 Buy globally, sell globally — without the goods ever touching Chinese soil. What does that mean? Let’s break it down. 👇 2/ Traditional offshore trade looked like this: 🔹 Foreign buyers ordered from China. 🔹 Chinese companies exported domestic goods overseas. That’s “Made in China, sold globally.” But now, China wants to go one step further. 3/ The new model is different: Chinese companies set up offshore subsidiaries (in Singapore, UAE, Hong Kong, etc.) to: ✅ Purchase goods from any country ✅ Resell them to any other market 🌏 All without the goods passing through China. It’s global trade, orchestrated by Chinese firms. 4/ In other words: China isn’t just the world’s factory anymore. It’s becoming the world’s trading hub — a smart, fast, and connected middleman. From factory to broker. From made-in-China to managed-by-China. This is economic diplomacy at its sharpest. 5/ Why now? Because the world is fragmenting. 🔻 Tariffs. 🔻 Sanctions. 🔻 Supply chain insecurity. Instead of retreating, China is adapting: 👉 Decentralizing its trade architecture 👉 Spreading risk 👉 Creating flexibility outside US jurisdiction 6/ There’s also a long-term vision. If China can: ✅ Orchestrate supply chains ✅ Handle global payments ✅ Leverage its shipping & logistics strength Then it wins pricing power, data advantage, and strategic depth — even without selling a single Chinese-made product. 7/ This is also part of de-dollarization. Offshore trade hubs help promote: 🌐 Cross-border yuan settlement 💱 Currency diversification 💳 Less reliance on Western banking systems It’s soft power through smart trade design. 8/ So while some think China is isolated… it’s actually re-wiring global trade routes. China is future-proofing its role in the world economy by: 🔹 Building infrastructure 🔹 Controlling flows 🔹 Replacing confrontation with competition This is strategy, not reaction. 9/ Final thought: The age of “Made in China” is evolving into the age of “Traded by China.” That may be harder to sanction, harder to stop — and ultimately, harder to compete with. The world is changing. Watch carefully. 🌏

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

56,942 просмотров • 1 год назад

IRAN'S BANKING DEFIANCE: THE LEAK CRACKING GLOBAL CONTROL One of the real reasons for the US-Zionist war against Iran goes far beyond surface-level politics or nuclear fears—it's a calculated strike against a nation daring to defy a shadowy global financial empire. As revelations tie post-9/11 invasions to banking control, Iran's unyielding stance reveals the true stakes: a programmable money system poised to monitor and manipulate every aspect of life. THE ROOTS OF RESISTANCE ➡️ The Iranian central bank firmly rejects Western central banking networks orchestrated by the Rothschilds and Warburgs and opposes integration into a system designed for programmable currencies. ➡️ This defiance traces back to 2001, when General Wesley Clark revealed plans to invade seven countries—Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran—not for terrorism, but for their independent banks blocking a global control framework. PROGRAMMABLE MONEY UNMASKED ➡️ Programmable money isn't just digital cash; it's coded with rules that enforce compliance, like blocking gas purchases if you violate lockdown zones tied to your digital ID. ❌ Central bankers gain unprecedented power, shifting from monetary policy to dictating fiscal rules via AI, eliminating "leakage" from non-compliant systems. ➡️ Iran's oil flows to China bolster BRICS autonomy, creating alternative payment networks that bypass sanctions and erode the interoperable control grid. THE BRICS CHALLENGE ➡️ BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa—are building independent systems, with Iran's resources amplifying China's freedom from Western constraints. ➡️These "leaks" frustrate the rollout of global digital IDs, where any holdout nation undermines the entire agenda of unified, rule-enforced finance. ➡️A victory over Iran would also be seen by the Western Rothschild banking system as a victory against the efforts of the BRICS nations to find an alternative to the dollar system. Iran's resistance is also resistance against the Epstein elite of the West, which has been able to leave its mark on the world thus far. HT: YouTube Tucker Carlson Network #ProgrammableMoney #IranResistance #BRICS #GlobalControl #FinancialFreedom #SurveillanceGrid #HiddenAgenda

IRAN'S BANKING DEFIANCE: THE LEAK CRACKING GLOBAL CONTROL One of the real reasons for the US-Zionist war against Iran goes far beyond surface-level politics or nuclear fears—it's a calculated strike against a nation daring to defy a shadowy global financial empire. As revelations tie post-9/11 invasions to banking control, Iran's unyielding stance reveals the true stakes: a programmable money system poised to monitor and manipulate every aspect of life. THE ROOTS OF RESISTANCE ➡️ The Iranian central bank firmly rejects Western central banking networks orchestrated by the Rothschilds and Warburgs and opposes integration into a system designed for programmable currencies. ➡️ This defiance traces back to 2001, when General Wesley Clark revealed plans to invade seven countries—Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran—not for terrorism, but for their independent banks blocking a global control framework. PROGRAMMABLE MONEY UNMASKED ➡️ Programmable money isn't just digital cash; it's coded with rules that enforce compliance, like blocking gas purchases if you violate lockdown zones tied to your digital ID. ❌ Central bankers gain unprecedented power, shifting from monetary policy to dictating fiscal rules via AI, eliminating "leakage" from non-compliant systems. ➡️ Iran's oil flows to China bolster BRICS autonomy, creating alternative payment networks that bypass sanctions and erode the interoperable control grid. THE BRICS CHALLENGE ➡️ BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa—are building independent systems, with Iran's resources amplifying China's freedom from Western constraints. ➡️These "leaks" frustrate the rollout of global digital IDs, where any holdout nation undermines the entire agenda of unified, rule-enforced finance. ➡️A victory over Iran would also be seen by the Western Rothschild banking system as a victory against the efforts of the BRICS nations to find an alternative to the dollar system. Iran's resistance is also resistance against the Epstein elite of the West, which has been able to leave its mark on the world thus far. HT: YouTube Tucker Carlson Network #ProgrammableMoney #IranResistance #BRICS #GlobalControl #FinancialFreedom #SurveillanceGrid #HiddenAgenda

Mark

41,861 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, and David Sacks discuss the growing risk of World War 3, calling on world leaders to prioritize peace, diplomacy, and cooperation to avert a looming catastrophe. Elon Musk: "We're sleepwalking our way into World War 3." Vivek Ramaswamy: "Once you explain to people that this is not anti-Ukraine or anti-Israel, but this is a pro-American or even, as Elon put it, a pro-civilizational view to keep us out of World War 3..." David Sacks: "This is why we need fresh thinking and leadership in Washington. People who've been there for 30+ years don't realize the world has changed. We're not in the unipolar moment anymore, and the people who developed all their political instincts during that moment have failed to grasp how the world has changed." Elon Musk: "A combination of Russia, China, and Iran should be viewed as very strong relative to the West... The potential here isn't a small battle. It is a massive battle where the industrial capacity is of comparable size to the Western alliances... We do not have an overwhelming advantage in industrial might, and the foundation of war is economic power, especially industrial output... Vivek Ramaswamy: "When you look at Russia's hypersonic missile capabilities and nuclear capabilities, both of which are ahead of ours, China's naval capacity, which arguably is ahead of ours, combined with our economic dependence on China, combined with tallying up the Western allies versus this alternative alliance between Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, I think it's important for people to understand that the US homeland is as vulnerable as we have been in modern memory." Elon Musk: "Unfortunately, our policy has been forcing Russia and Iran to ally with China. It's been forcing them. What choice have we given them? And so, Russia has the raw materials, and China has the industrial capacity, frankly, a perfect match from a war standpoint. So we need to stop doing that. It's unwise, and I think it will lead to immense risk to civilization... We need to make sure we are not putting civilization itself at risk, which is World War 3." David Sacks: "You know, it's funny, in the VC world where we operate, track record is all important. When you assess whether an investor is good at their job or not, the first thing you look at is track record. But in international relations, there seems to be no concept of a track record."

Elon Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, and David Sacks discuss the growing risk of World War 3, calling on world leaders to prioritize peace, diplomacy, and cooperation to avert a looming catastrophe. Elon Musk: "We're sleepwalking our way into World War 3." Vivek Ramaswamy: "Once you explain to people that this is not anti-Ukraine or anti-Israel, but this is a pro-American or even, as Elon put it, a pro-civilizational view to keep us out of World War 3..." David Sacks: "This is why we need fresh thinking and leadership in Washington. People who've been there for 30+ years don't realize the world has changed. We're not in the unipolar moment anymore, and the people who developed all their political instincts during that moment have failed to grasp how the world has changed." Elon Musk: "A combination of Russia, China, and Iran should be viewed as very strong relative to the West... The potential here isn't a small battle. It is a massive battle where the industrial capacity is of comparable size to the Western alliances... We do not have an overwhelming advantage in industrial might, and the foundation of war is economic power, especially industrial output... Vivek Ramaswamy: "When you look at Russia's hypersonic missile capabilities and nuclear capabilities, both of which are ahead of ours, China's naval capacity, which arguably is ahead of ours, combined with our economic dependence on China, combined with tallying up the Western allies versus this alternative alliance between Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, I think it's important for people to understand that the US homeland is as vulnerable as we have been in modern memory." Elon Musk: "Unfortunately, our policy has been forcing Russia and Iran to ally with China. It's been forcing them. What choice have we given them? And so, Russia has the raw materials, and China has the industrial capacity, frankly, a perfect match from a war standpoint. So we need to stop doing that. It's unwise, and I think it will lead to immense risk to civilization... We need to make sure we are not putting civilization itself at risk, which is World War 3." David Sacks: "You know, it's funny, in the VC world where we operate, track record is all important. When you assess whether an investor is good at their job or not, the first thing you look at is track record. But in international relations, there seems to be no concept of a track record."

KanekoaTheGreat

2,444,837 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🔥🚨💣 “EU IS DEAD! Weak Brussels elites humiliated as Trump & Putin run the world” 🇪🇺❌🇸🇰 Slovak MEP explodes: ‘Europe is ruled by losers’ The European Union is no longer a serious power. That’s the brutal verdict delivered by Slovak MEP Milan Uhrik MEP • Republika, who launched a scathing attack on Brussels, accusing EU leaders of geopolitical irrelevance and total weakness. According to Uhrík, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin don’t even bother listening to Brussels anymore. “The opinion of the EU means absolutely NOTHING to Trump or Putin,” “Because Europe is led by pathetic losers who can’t defend their own nations.” While Washington, Moscow and Beijing openly fight for strategic interests, Uhrík says Europe has become a puppet continent – obedient, dependent and paralyzed by bureaucracy. ⸻ ⚡ “REAL LEADERS PROTECT THEIR NATIONS – EUROPE CAN’T” Uhrík drew a sharp contrast between global power players and EU elites. • Trump defends American industry • Putin protects Russian interests • China builds global influence • Meanwhile Brussels debates ideology “We blame Trump, Putin and Xi,” Uhrík said, “But THEY protect their people. That’s leadership. Europe doesn’t have that.” He directly attacked Macron, Scholz and Ursula von der Leyen, accusing them of being disconnected from reality and controlled by foreign pressure. “European politicians are trained to obey foreign embassies.” “The moment someone defends sovereignty, they are hunted.” ⸻ 🧨 “TRUMP TOLD EUROPE: TAKE CARE OF YOURSELVES – AND THEY PANICKED” Uhrík pointed to Trump’s famous message telling Europe to stand on its own feet. The result? “They didn’t know what to do.” “That shows how dependent and weak Europe has become.” ⸻ 🌍 POWER SHIFT: EUROPE LEFT BEHIND While the world reorganizes… 🇺🇸 America rebuilds industry 🇷🇺 Russia partners with China 🌏 BRICS grows stronger 🇪🇺 EU argues about ideology Europe, Uhrík warns, is sleepwalking into irrelevance. ⸻ 🚨 FINAL WARNING “The EU is not a strong bloc.” “It is a sinking ship led by incompetent elites.” ⸻ 💬 Is Europe finished as a global power? Do we need STRONG national leaders again? 👇 Comment. Share. Expose. #EU #Trump #Putin #Europe #Geopolitics #Breaking #Sovereignty #GlobalPower #Brussels

🔥🚨💣 “EU IS DEAD! Weak Brussels elites humiliated as Trump & Putin run the world” 🇪🇺❌🇸🇰 Slovak MEP explodes: ‘Europe is ruled by losers’ The European Union is no longer a serious power. That’s the brutal verdict delivered by Slovak MEP Milan Uhrik MEP • Republika, who launched a scathing attack on Brussels, accusing EU leaders of geopolitical irrelevance and total weakness. According to Uhrík, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin don’t even bother listening to Brussels anymore. “The opinion of the EU means absolutely NOTHING to Trump or Putin,” “Because Europe is led by pathetic losers who can’t defend their own nations.” While Washington, Moscow and Beijing openly fight for strategic interests, Uhrík says Europe has become a puppet continent – obedient, dependent and paralyzed by bureaucracy. ⸻ ⚡ “REAL LEADERS PROTECT THEIR NATIONS – EUROPE CAN’T” Uhrík drew a sharp contrast between global power players and EU elites. • Trump defends American industry • Putin protects Russian interests • China builds global influence • Meanwhile Brussels debates ideology “We blame Trump, Putin and Xi,” Uhrík said, “But THEY protect their people. That’s leadership. Europe doesn’t have that.” He directly attacked Macron, Scholz and Ursula von der Leyen, accusing them of being disconnected from reality and controlled by foreign pressure. “European politicians are trained to obey foreign embassies.” “The moment someone defends sovereignty, they are hunted.” ⸻ 🧨 “TRUMP TOLD EUROPE: TAKE CARE OF YOURSELVES – AND THEY PANICKED” Uhrík pointed to Trump’s famous message telling Europe to stand on its own feet. The result? “They didn’t know what to do.” “That shows how dependent and weak Europe has become.” ⸻ 🌍 POWER SHIFT: EUROPE LEFT BEHIND While the world reorganizes… 🇺🇸 America rebuilds industry 🇷🇺 Russia partners with China 🌏 BRICS grows stronger 🇪🇺 EU argues about ideology Europe, Uhrík warns, is sleepwalking into irrelevance. ⸻ 🚨 FINAL WARNING “The EU is not a strong bloc.” “It is a sinking ship led by incompetent elites.” ⸻ 💬 Is Europe finished as a global power? Do we need STRONG national leaders again? 👇 Comment. Share. Expose. #EU #Trump #Putin #Europe #Geopolitics #Breaking #Sovereignty #GlobalPower #Brussels

Slavic Networks

19,297 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🏭 The Garden Grove Crisis: Overview The GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California, has been a toxic catastrophe in slow motion. This plant has been processing aerospace components with known hazardous materials — hexavalent chromium, cadmium, and other heavy metals — for decades. The core allegation is that systematic neglect of environmental safety protocols has exposed workers and the surrounding community to dangerous levels of carcinogenic compounds. Hexavalent chromium (the Erin Brockovich chemical) is no joke. It’s a known carcinogen that damages DNA, causes lung cancer, and leaches into groundwater with devastating persistence. The facility’s crisis came to a head with reports of: - Improper waste disposal practices spanning years - Workers reporting chronic health issues consistent with heavy metal exposure - Regulatory inspections found significant violations - Community groundwater contamination concerns - Gavin Newsom’s government turned a blind eye. Was it an appeasement to Xi Jinping and China? 🇬🇧 The Melrose Industries Connection This is where it starts to get ugly from a national security and accountability standpoint. Melrose Industries — a British private equity-style turnaround firm — acquired GKN in a bitterly contested $10 billion hostile takeover in 2018. This was the original GKN, a company founded in 1759 that literally supplied cannons to the British military during the Napoleonic Wars and built Spitfires in WWII. A cornerstone of British industrial heritage, gutted by financial engineers. Melrose’s business model is well-documented and brutally simple: 1. Acquire undervalued industrial companies (often with hostile bids) 2. Slash costs aggressively — R&D, maintenance, environmental compliance, workforce 3. Extract maximum cash flow 4. Sell the stripped-down entity for a profit within 3-5 years They did this with previous acquisitions like Elster Group and Nortek. GKN was just their biggest target. The Garden Grove situation is a textbook case of what happens when a short-term-profit-maximizing financial owner takes over a complex industrial operation with serious legacy environmental liabilities. Environmental compliance, worker safety, and long-term remediation planning are cost centers — exactly the line items that get hollowed out under the Melrose model. 🇨🇳 The China Angle This is where the national security dimension gets genuinely alarming. GKN Aerospace is not some peripheral parts supplier. They manufacture critical components for: - F-35 Lightning II (Lockheed Martin) - F/A-18 Super Hornet (Boeing) - CH-53K King Stallion (Sikorsky) - Multiple commercial aircraft platforms (Airbus A350, Boeing 787) - Engine components for Rolls-Royce, GE, and Pratt & Whitney Now consider the ownership and supply chain structure: Melrose Industries itself is publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange, but the deeper concern is about where GKN Aerospace's supply chains, joint ventures, and customer relationships extend. GKN Aerospace has: - A significant joint venture in China — GKN Aerospace has partnered with Chinese state-owned and state-linked aerospace entities for years, including work on the COMAC C919 (China's homegrown narrow-body competitor to the 737/A320) - Technology transfer agreements that involve sharing manufacturing processes, material science, and quality control methodologies with Chinese partners - Supply chain integration where Chinese-sourced materials and components flow into GKN's global operations — including potentially into US military supply chains The F-35 connection makes this especially sensitive. GKN produces the F-35’s canopy, among other components. The idea that a British holding company — itself under pressure to maximize returns — might be cutting corners on environmental compliance at a facility that feeds into the most advanced fighter program on the planet, while simultaneously maintaining deep joint venture relationships with Chinese aerospace entities, is the kind of multi-layered security concern that doesn’t get nearly enough attention. How the f*ck is this allowed? 🔥 The Larger Pattern This isn’t just about one facility. The GKN/Melrose situation exemplifies a broader rot in Western defense industrial policy: - Hostile foreign ownership of critical defense suppliers with minimal CFIUS-style scrutiny (because the UK is an "ally") - Financial engineering that prioritizes short-term extraction over long-term capability and safety - Environmental externalization, where cleanup costs get dumped on taxpayers while profits go to London and the Caymans - Technology leakage risks through joint ventures with adversary nations that get treated as routine “commercial” arrangements The Garden Grove toxic crisis is the physical manifestation of this financialization. When you strip out maintenance budgets, defer environmental remediation, and cut compliance staffing to hit quarterly EBITDA targets, you get hexavalent chromium in the groundwater and sick workers. The fact that this is happening at a facility tied to the F-35 supply chain while the parent company’s broader network extends deep into China’s aerospace sector should be setting off every alarm bell in Washington! Instead, Melrose just announced they’re planning to spin off or sell GKN Aerospace in 2025-2026 — the classic “strip, flip, and walk away” endgame, leaving the environmental liabilities for someone else to clean up. It’s a case study in why treating defense industrial base assets as financial instruments rather than strategic capabilities is a slow-motion national security disaster. Now, Newsom and the California Uniparty legislature’s cozy relationship with the CCP should make more sense. 🌐 The China Dimension — Why This Goes Beyond Environmental Crime The joint venture structure is the sleeper issue here: - GKN Aerospace + SAMC (COMAC subsidiary) — Joint venture to manufacture composite horizontal tail planes for the C919, China's direct competitor to the 737 and A320 - GKN Aerospace + AVIC + COMAC — 2020 aerostructures joint venture - 12 manufacturing locations across China, 5,000 employees — Deep integration into China's aerospace ecosystem The concern isn’t just that a British holding company owns a defense supplier. It’s that the same corporate entity simultaneously: - Produces F-35 canopies for the US military - Partners with Chinese state-owned aerospace companies on advanced composite manufacturing - Is apparently cutting corners on maintenance to the point of near-catastrophic failure The intelligence community should be asking: was the deferred maintenance just standard Melrose cost-stripping, or was there any external factor at play? A facility producing military aircraft components that suffers a catastrophic failure — whether accidental or otherwise — is a national security event. Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump Vice President JD Vance JD Vance Treasury Department Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth Department of War 🇺🇸 Office of the ASW for Industrial Base Policy EPA Pacific Southwest Region U.S. EPA OSHA_DOL FBI Armed Services GOP House Armed Services Democrats Oversight Committee Oversight Dems U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. Department of Justice @DAGToddBlanche CIA Director John Ratcliffe CIA

🏭 The Garden Grove Crisis: Overview The GKN Aerospace facility in Garden Grove, California, has been a toxic catastrophe in slow motion. This plant has been processing aerospace components with known hazardous materials — hexavalent chromium, cadmium, and other heavy metals — for decades. The core allegation is that systematic neglect of environmental safety protocols has exposed workers and the surrounding community to dangerous levels of carcinogenic compounds. Hexavalent chromium (the Erin Brockovich chemical) is no joke. It’s a known carcinogen that damages DNA, causes lung cancer, and leaches into groundwater with devastating persistence. The facility’s crisis came to a head with reports of: - Improper waste disposal practices spanning years - Workers reporting chronic health issues consistent with heavy metal exposure - Regulatory inspections found significant violations - Community groundwater contamination concerns - Gavin Newsom’s government turned a blind eye. Was it an appeasement to Xi Jinping and China? 🇬🇧 The Melrose Industries Connection This is where it starts to get ugly from a national security and accountability standpoint. Melrose Industries — a British private equity-style turnaround firm — acquired GKN in a bitterly contested $10 billion hostile takeover in 2018. This was the original GKN, a company founded in 1759 that literally supplied cannons to the British military during the Napoleonic Wars and built Spitfires in WWII. A cornerstone of British industrial heritage, gutted by financial engineers. Melrose’s business model is well-documented and brutally simple: 1. Acquire undervalued industrial companies (often with hostile bids) 2. Slash costs aggressively — R&D, maintenance, environmental compliance, workforce 3. Extract maximum cash flow 4. Sell the stripped-down entity for a profit within 3-5 years They did this with previous acquisitions like Elster Group and Nortek. GKN was just their biggest target. The Garden Grove situation is a textbook case of what happens when a short-term-profit-maximizing financial owner takes over a complex industrial operation with serious legacy environmental liabilities. Environmental compliance, worker safety, and long-term remediation planning are cost centers — exactly the line items that get hollowed out under the Melrose model. 🇨🇳 The China Angle This is where the national security dimension gets genuinely alarming. GKN Aerospace is not some peripheral parts supplier. They manufacture critical components for: - F-35 Lightning II (Lockheed Martin) - F/A-18 Super Hornet (Boeing) - CH-53K King Stallion (Sikorsky) - Multiple commercial aircraft platforms (Airbus A350, Boeing 787) - Engine components for Rolls-Royce, GE, and Pratt & Whitney Now consider the ownership and supply chain structure: Melrose Industries itself is publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange, but the deeper concern is about where GKN Aerospace's supply chains, joint ventures, and customer relationships extend. GKN Aerospace has: - A significant joint venture in China — GKN Aerospace has partnered with Chinese state-owned and state-linked aerospace entities for years, including work on the COMAC C919 (China's homegrown narrow-body competitor to the 737/A320) - Technology transfer agreements that involve sharing manufacturing processes, material science, and quality control methodologies with Chinese partners - Supply chain integration where Chinese-sourced materials and components flow into GKN's global operations — including potentially into US military supply chains The F-35 connection makes this especially sensitive. GKN produces the F-35’s canopy, among other components. The idea that a British holding company — itself under pressure to maximize returns — might be cutting corners on environmental compliance at a facility that feeds into the most advanced fighter program on the planet, while simultaneously maintaining deep joint venture relationships with Chinese aerospace entities, is the kind of multi-layered security concern that doesn’t get nearly enough attention. How the f*ck is this allowed? 🔥 The Larger Pattern This isn’t just about one facility. The GKN/Melrose situation exemplifies a broader rot in Western defense industrial policy: - Hostile foreign ownership of critical defense suppliers with minimal CFIUS-style scrutiny (because the UK is an "ally") - Financial engineering that prioritizes short-term extraction over long-term capability and safety - Environmental externalization, where cleanup costs get dumped on taxpayers while profits go to London and the Caymans - Technology leakage risks through joint ventures with adversary nations that get treated as routine “commercial” arrangements The Garden Grove toxic crisis is the physical manifestation of this financialization. When you strip out maintenance budgets, defer environmental remediation, and cut compliance staffing to hit quarterly EBITDA targets, you get hexavalent chromium in the groundwater and sick workers. The fact that this is happening at a facility tied to the F-35 supply chain while the parent company’s broader network extends deep into China’s aerospace sector should be setting off every alarm bell in Washington! Instead, Melrose just announced they’re planning to spin off or sell GKN Aerospace in 2025-2026 — the classic “strip, flip, and walk away” endgame, leaving the environmental liabilities for someone else to clean up. It’s a case study in why treating defense industrial base assets as financial instruments rather than strategic capabilities is a slow-motion national security disaster. Now, Newsom and the California Uniparty legislature’s cozy relationship with the CCP should make more sense. 🌐 The China Dimension — Why This Goes Beyond Environmental Crime The joint venture structure is the sleeper issue here: - GKN Aerospace + SAMC (COMAC subsidiary) — Joint venture to manufacture composite horizontal tail planes for the C919, China's direct competitor to the 737 and A320 - GKN Aerospace + AVIC + COMAC — 2020 aerostructures joint venture - 12 manufacturing locations across China, 5,000 employees — Deep integration into China's aerospace ecosystem The concern isn’t just that a British holding company owns a defense supplier. It’s that the same corporate entity simultaneously: - Produces F-35 canopies for the US military - Partners with Chinese state-owned aerospace companies on advanced composite manufacturing - Is apparently cutting corners on maintenance to the point of near-catastrophic failure The intelligence community should be asking: was the deferred maintenance just standard Melrose cost-stripping, or was there any external factor at play? A facility producing military aircraft components that suffers a catastrophic failure — whether accidental or otherwise — is a national security event. Donald J. Trump President Donald J. Trump Vice President JD Vance JD Vance Treasury Department Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency Secretary of War Pete Hegseth Pete Hegseth Department of War 🇺🇸 Office of the ASW for Industrial Base Policy EPA Pacific Southwest Region U.S. EPA OSHA_DOL FBI Armed Services GOP House Armed Services Democrats Oversight Committee Oversight Dems U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission U.S. Department of Justice @DAGToddBlanche CIA Director John Ratcliffe CIA

Tony Seruga

32,911 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The success of India’s energy diplomacy under the leadership of PM Sh Narendra Modi Ji bears positive results even as the world is faced with serious geopolitical crises. Our energy imports continue uninterrupted even as supply chains choke. We are able to ensure easy availability of fuel for our citizens even as countries worldwide struggle to make energy ends meet. We are able to do this because India has diversified its import basket to 41 sources from the basket of 27 that existed in 2014. India not only secured its energy needs, but emerged stronger, more resilient, and better prepared for the future. While many countries struggled with shortages and soaring prices, India protected its citizens because we planned ahead, diversified supply chains, strengthened strategic reserves, expanded sourcing options, and took difficult decisions when required. PM Modi Ji’s vision has never been limited to managing crises. His vision is to use every crisis as an opportunity to build the future. India’s ethanol blending programme has grown from approximately 1.5% to the threshold of a 20% blending economy. Flex-fuel technology is creating new opportunities for consumers and farmers. E85-compatible vehicles will provide more fuel choices, lower operating costs, and reduce dependence on imported crude. At the same time, India is positioning itself at the forefront of the global clean-energy transition. Through the National Green Hydrogen Mission, the country is laying the foundation for a new energy ecosystem that can power industries, create jobs, attract investment, and strengthen energy independence.

The success of India’s energy diplomacy under the leadership of PM Sh Narendra Modi Ji bears positive results even as the world is faced with serious geopolitical crises. Our energy imports continue uninterrupted even as supply chains choke. We are able to ensure easy availability of fuel for our citizens even as countries worldwide struggle to make energy ends meet. We are able to do this because India has diversified its import basket to 41 sources from the basket of 27 that existed in 2014. India not only secured its energy needs, but emerged stronger, more resilient, and better prepared for the future. While many countries struggled with shortages and soaring prices, India protected its citizens because we planned ahead, diversified supply chains, strengthened strategic reserves, expanded sourcing options, and took difficult decisions when required. PM Modi Ji’s vision has never been limited to managing crises. His vision is to use every crisis as an opportunity to build the future. India’s ethanol blending programme has grown from approximately 1.5% to the threshold of a 20% blending economy. Flex-fuel technology is creating new opportunities for consumers and farmers. E85-compatible vehicles will provide more fuel choices, lower operating costs, and reduce dependence on imported crude. At the same time, India is positioning itself at the forefront of the global clean-energy transition. Through the National Green Hydrogen Mission, the country is laying the foundation for a new energy ecosystem that can power industries, create jobs, attract investment, and strengthen energy independence.

Hardeep Singh Puri

17,275 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

When you know the world's largest Muslim majority country chose India over China and in doing so handed PM Modi China's biggest strategic nightmare, the entire Indo-Pacific balance just shifted quietly. Indonesia is not a small player. 280 million people. The world's largest Muslim majority nation. And its biggest maritime neighbour is not China. It is India. Two thousand years of oceanic trade through the same corridor. Indonesia's people changed their religion over centuries but never changed their civilisational roots. Their national airline is still Garuda. That connection runs deeper than any recent geopolitical calculation. And now it is producing consequences Beijing genuinely fears. India and Indonesia are jointly developing Sabang Port at the entrance of the Malacca Strait. Just 160 kilometres from India's Great Nicobar project. One third of global trade passes through this narrow chokepoint. China's entire energy supply transits it. For twenty years Beijing has called this its Malacca Dilemma, the single strategic vulnerability that no amount of military buildup can fully solve. India just positioned itself permanently on both sides of that gateway simultaneously. Quietly. Without a single dramatic announcement. The partnership goes well beyond one port. Indonesia signed a contract for India's indigenous air to air missiles. It is expanding its BrahMos arsenal further. India's defence exports hit a record Rs 38,424 crore this year. India will establish nickel and rare earth magnet processing industries in Indonesia, directly targeting the Chinese monopoly on critical mineral supply chains that Beijing has weaponised against the world. Then the trust indicators that reveal how deep this relationship actually runs. UPI is being integrated into Indonesia's payment infrastructure. Indian archaeologists are restoring the 1,170 year old Prambanan Shiva temple in Java. A country does not invite another nation to restore its ancient temples unless the relationship operates at a level that has nothing to do with transactional geopolitics. China spent decades trying to pull Indonesia into its orbit through infrastructure loans, investment promises and Belt and Road positioning. Indonesia watched. Calculated. And then chose to develop its most strategically sensitive port with India instead. The Malacca Dilemma was always China's greatest fear. The scenario where a hostile or unfriendly power sits at the entrance of the strait through which all Chinese energy flows. PM Modi just made that scenario real without firing a shot or issuing a single threat. India did not ask China's permission to stand at the Malacca gateway. It simply showed up. And Indonesia opened the door.

When you know the world's largest Muslim majority country chose India over China and in doing so handed PM Modi China's biggest strategic nightmare, the entire Indo-Pacific balance just shifted quietly. Indonesia is not a small player. 280 million people. The world's largest Muslim majority nation. And its biggest maritime neighbour is not China. It is India. Two thousand years of oceanic trade through the same corridor. Indonesia's people changed their religion over centuries but never changed their civilisational roots. Their national airline is still Garuda. That connection runs deeper than any recent geopolitical calculation. And now it is producing consequences Beijing genuinely fears. India and Indonesia are jointly developing Sabang Port at the entrance of the Malacca Strait. Just 160 kilometres from India's Great Nicobar project. One third of global trade passes through this narrow chokepoint. China's entire energy supply transits it. For twenty years Beijing has called this its Malacca Dilemma, the single strategic vulnerability that no amount of military buildup can fully solve. India just positioned itself permanently on both sides of that gateway simultaneously. Quietly. Without a single dramatic announcement. The partnership goes well beyond one port. Indonesia signed a contract for India's indigenous air to air missiles. It is expanding its BrahMos arsenal further. India's defence exports hit a record Rs 38,424 crore this year. India will establish nickel and rare earth magnet processing industries in Indonesia, directly targeting the Chinese monopoly on critical mineral supply chains that Beijing has weaponised against the world. Then the trust indicators that reveal how deep this relationship actually runs. UPI is being integrated into Indonesia's payment infrastructure. Indian archaeologists are restoring the 1,170 year old Prambanan Shiva temple in Java. A country does not invite another nation to restore its ancient temples unless the relationship operates at a level that has nothing to do with transactional geopolitics. China spent decades trying to pull Indonesia into its orbit through infrastructure loans, investment promises and Belt and Road positioning. Indonesia watched. Calculated. And then chose to develop its most strategically sensitive port with India instead. The Malacca Dilemma was always China's greatest fear. The scenario where a hostile or unfriendly power sits at the entrance of the strait through which all Chinese energy flows. PM Modi just made that scenario real without firing a shot or issuing a single threat. India did not ask China's permission to stand at the Malacca gateway. It simply showed up. And Indonesia opened the door.

Karan Datta 🇮🇳

16,254 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"India will be invited to join US-led initiative Pax Silica as 'full member' next month"- US embassador Sergio Gor Trying to act smart, Trump? But Bharat under PM .Narendra Modi Ji can see through this 'noble gesture'! Why's US Pushing Bharat into Pax Silica: It's All About American Interests, Not Altruism. Let's cut through diplomatic fluff. US inviting Bharat to join Pax Silica—a coalition for securing supply chains in critical minerals, semiconductors, AI & advanced tech—isn't some benevolent gesture. America doesn't do global alliances without hefty dose of self-interest. Here's real playbook on why Uncle Sam wants us in & crucially, how Bharat must play smart to avoid getting trapped in one-sided deal. 👉US Motives- Securing Dominance, Countering China & Tapping Bharat's Assets 1. Countering China's Monopoly: China controls 90% of global rare earth processing & massive chunk of semiconductor supply chains. Pax Silica is Washington's answer to "de-risk" from Beijing—building a "trusted" network of allies to reroute critical tech flows. Bharat, with world's 3rd-largest rare earth reserves (6.9 million tonnes, mostly in coastal monazite sands), is prime target. US wants access to our raw materials to feed their refineries & fabs, reducing reliance on China without lifting a finger on their own soil. 2. Geopolitical Leverage in Indo-Pacific: Pax Silica pulls Bharat deeper into US orbit as a "strategic counterweight" to China. It's about encircling Beijing economically—Japan, South Korea, UK, Israel are already in; adding Bharat's scale (population, market, geography) makes it powerhouse bloc. Trump-era reciprocity means fair trade on paper, but in reality, it's about locking in allies for tech war. 3. Economic Goldmine-Talent, Market & Cheap Resources: Bharat's engineering prowess, booming digital economy & manufacturing push (via PLI schemes) are irresistible. US sees us as a diversification hub—away from Taiwan's risks—for chips & AI. But dig deeper: Raw rare earths sell for $3,000/tonne, while processed magnets (which we'd import back) go for $25000/tonne. Joining gives US firms access to our resources, talent & $3T+ market, boosting their profits while we play supplier. 4. Tech Sovereignty for US, Not World: This's about controlling "operating system of modern power"—silicon, AI, data centers. By inviting Bharat early, US ensures standards, export controls & investments align with American rules, preventing a multipolar tech world where Bharat could pivot to alternatives. 🔥In short, Pax Silica is economic statecraft: Prosperity for US bloc, dependency for others. It's not charity; it's strategy. 👉How Bharat Must Not Fall into the Trap? JOIN, BUT ON OUR TERMS. Bharat should absolutely join—access to tech, R&D & global chains is a win for our semiconductor ambitions (we're already at <1% global production despite reserves). But NOT Blindly. Here's what Modi Sarkar will demand even as members: —Demand Tech Transfer & Build Domestic Muscle: No deal without enforceable clauses for refining tech & joint fabs in India. —Invest heavily in our own processing plants (e.g., expand IREL's capabilities) to avoid exporting cheap ore & importing pricey chips. –Push for co-ownership in AI/logistics standards—don't let US/Japan hog high-value end. —Maintain Strategic Autonomy by Diversifying Alliances. Will Keep balancing with China (via BRICS/SCO), Russia & EU. Bharat won't burn bridges; but will use Pax Silica to negotiate better terms elsewhere. —Safeguard Data, IP & Sovereignty: Enforce strict data localization in AI deals. Protect our startups from IP theft or forced partnerships. Monitor investments via CFIUS-like screening to block backdoor control. —Focus on Long-Term Resilience: Ramp up R&D funding (aim for 2% GDP), skill 1M+ engineers in semis/AI, & integrate with Quad/iCET for broader gains. IF AMERICA AGREES TO THIS, PAX SILICA IS WELCOME. OR ELSE....THANK YOU, BUT NO THANK YOU!

"India will be invited to join US-led initiative Pax Silica as 'full member' next month"- US embassador Sergio Gor Trying to act smart, Trump? But Bharat under PM .Narendra Modi Ji can see through this 'noble gesture'! Why's US Pushing Bharat into Pax Silica: It's All About American Interests, Not Altruism. Let's cut through diplomatic fluff. US inviting Bharat to join Pax Silica—a coalition for securing supply chains in critical minerals, semiconductors, AI & advanced tech—isn't some benevolent gesture. America doesn't do global alliances without hefty dose of self-interest. Here's real playbook on why Uncle Sam wants us in & crucially, how Bharat must play smart to avoid getting trapped in one-sided deal. 👉US Motives- Securing Dominance, Countering China & Tapping Bharat's Assets 1. Countering China's Monopoly: China controls 90% of global rare earth processing & massive chunk of semiconductor supply chains. Pax Silica is Washington's answer to "de-risk" from Beijing—building a "trusted" network of allies to reroute critical tech flows. Bharat, with world's 3rd-largest rare earth reserves (6.9 million tonnes, mostly in coastal monazite sands), is prime target. US wants access to our raw materials to feed their refineries & fabs, reducing reliance on China without lifting a finger on their own soil. 2. Geopolitical Leverage in Indo-Pacific: Pax Silica pulls Bharat deeper into US orbit as a "strategic counterweight" to China. It's about encircling Beijing economically—Japan, South Korea, UK, Israel are already in; adding Bharat's scale (population, market, geography) makes it powerhouse bloc. Trump-era reciprocity means fair trade on paper, but in reality, it's about locking in allies for tech war. 3. Economic Goldmine-Talent, Market & Cheap Resources: Bharat's engineering prowess, booming digital economy & manufacturing push (via PLI schemes) are irresistible. US sees us as a diversification hub—away from Taiwan's risks—for chips & AI. But dig deeper: Raw rare earths sell for $3,000/tonne, while processed magnets (which we'd import back) go for $25000/tonne. Joining gives US firms access to our resources, talent & $3T+ market, boosting their profits while we play supplier. 4. Tech Sovereignty for US, Not World: This's about controlling "operating system of modern power"—silicon, AI, data centers. By inviting Bharat early, US ensures standards, export controls & investments align with American rules, preventing a multipolar tech world where Bharat could pivot to alternatives. 🔥In short, Pax Silica is economic statecraft: Prosperity for US bloc, dependency for others. It's not charity; it's strategy. 👉How Bharat Must Not Fall into the Trap? JOIN, BUT ON OUR TERMS. Bharat should absolutely join—access to tech, R&D & global chains is a win for our semiconductor ambitions (we're already at <1% global production despite reserves). But NOT Blindly. Here's what Modi Sarkar will demand even as members: —Demand Tech Transfer & Build Domestic Muscle: No deal without enforceable clauses for refining tech & joint fabs in India. —Invest heavily in our own processing plants (e.g., expand IREL's capabilities) to avoid exporting cheap ore & importing pricey chips. –Push for co-ownership in AI/logistics standards—don't let US/Japan hog high-value end. —Maintain Strategic Autonomy by Diversifying Alliances. Will Keep balancing with China (via BRICS/SCO), Russia & EU. Bharat won't burn bridges; but will use Pax Silica to negotiate better terms elsewhere. —Safeguard Data, IP & Sovereignty: Enforce strict data localization in AI deals. Protect our startups from IP theft or forced partnerships. Monitor investments via CFIUS-like screening to block backdoor control. —Focus on Long-Term Resilience: Ramp up R&D funding (aim for 2% GDP), skill 1M+ engineers in semis/AI, & integrate with Quad/iCET for broader gains. IF AMERICA AGREES TO THIS, PAX SILICA IS WELCOME. OR ELSE....THANK YOU, BUT NO THANK YOU!

BhikuMhatre

60,782 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Eric Li (a famous Chinese VC and the founder of Guancha) and Márton Ugrósdy, (Hungary's Deputy State Secretary) are absolutely correct: "In [today's geopolitical] environment countries that can maintain their neutrality will benefit the most. Countries that are being forced to take sides will lose... Neutrality will be a prized asset but it takes finesse, political will and sovereignty to do that [and achieve] strategic autonomy, political autonomy, cultural autonomy." Márton Ugrósdy adds that if "you end up in a position where you have to make 'either-or' choices between great powers then you messed up something years ago". This is the main tragedy of the EU over the past 20 years. An accumulation of bad choices over years means that it has no strategic autonomy, no sovereignty and is constantly forced to make either-or choices that work out against its interests. All with the result that it is so far THE big loser of today's geopolitical environment. We constantly talk about "freedom" and the importance of it but we somehow only ever look at individual freedom, never our collective ability as nations (or supranational entities like the EU) to be masters of our own destiny. When you think about it that's arguably even more important than individual freedom because you can individually be free all you want - be able to post whatever you want on Twitter and whatnot - but that counts little if in the grander scheme of things you're a citizen of a country that isn't free to choose its own destiny and is constantly forced to make choice that impoverish you or make you less secure... What kind of "freedom" is that? This is at heart why I have such an issue with people who put individual freedom at the pinnacle of what we ought to aim for as a society. It's akin to you being on the Titanic and saying that the most important thing to you is how comfy your cabin is... Or, more to the point, it's saying that it's ok if countries have their ships steered by outside powers - what matter most is that their passengers can tweet about it. It's downright myopic and practically destructive, ending up destroying collective AND individual freedom. This question also reveals something fascinating about the difference in vision for the world order between China and the U.S. China, throughout its history and all the more since the founding of the PRC, has always argued in favor of non-interference in other states' internal affairs, meaning in favor of not impeding on their sovereignty (and of course, in favor of no-one impeding on China's sovereignty). In that sense, Eric Li reflects China's official position here. It means that China is agnostic on individual freedom (it's your own choice internally) but takes an active stance in favor of sovereignty, i.e. collective freedom. The U.S. is almost the polar opposite: they take a very strong stance on individual freedom but make a mockery of collective freedom, as they violate countries' sovereignty as a matter of routine. Heck, they have entire agencies (like the National Endowment for Democracy) whose entire purpose is to violate countries' sovereignty. And in fact, often, they use individual freedom as an excuse to do so. Going back to my Titanic ideology, this means that China's vision is to ensure the ships remain under their captains' control, while the US focuses on the accommodations for individual passengers - even if that means drilling holes in other ships' hulls. It's almost a philosophical debate. How meaningful is individual freedom without the ability of a community to chart its own course? Europe needs to learn real fast that in today's world the answer is that if you can't steer your ship freely the whole thing will sink.

Eric Li (a famous Chinese VC and the founder of Guancha) and Márton Ugrósdy, (Hungary's Deputy State Secretary) are absolutely correct: "In [today's geopolitical] environment countries that can maintain their neutrality will benefit the most. Countries that are being forced to take sides will lose... Neutrality will be a prized asset but it takes finesse, political will and sovereignty to do that [and achieve] strategic autonomy, political autonomy, cultural autonomy." Márton Ugrósdy adds that if "you end up in a position where you have to make 'either-or' choices between great powers then you messed up something years ago". This is the main tragedy of the EU over the past 20 years. An accumulation of bad choices over years means that it has no strategic autonomy, no sovereignty and is constantly forced to make either-or choices that work out against its interests. All with the result that it is so far THE big loser of today's geopolitical environment. We constantly talk about "freedom" and the importance of it but we somehow only ever look at individual freedom, never our collective ability as nations (or supranational entities like the EU) to be masters of our own destiny. When you think about it that's arguably even more important than individual freedom because you can individually be free all you want - be able to post whatever you want on Twitter and whatnot - but that counts little if in the grander scheme of things you're a citizen of a country that isn't free to choose its own destiny and is constantly forced to make choice that impoverish you or make you less secure... What kind of "freedom" is that? This is at heart why I have such an issue with people who put individual freedom at the pinnacle of what we ought to aim for as a society. It's akin to you being on the Titanic and saying that the most important thing to you is how comfy your cabin is... Or, more to the point, it's saying that it's ok if countries have their ships steered by outside powers - what matter most is that their passengers can tweet about it. It's downright myopic and practically destructive, ending up destroying collective AND individual freedom. This question also reveals something fascinating about the difference in vision for the world order between China and the U.S. China, throughout its history and all the more since the founding of the PRC, has always argued in favor of non-interference in other states' internal affairs, meaning in favor of not impeding on their sovereignty (and of course, in favor of no-one impeding on China's sovereignty). In that sense, Eric Li reflects China's official position here. It means that China is agnostic on individual freedom (it's your own choice internally) but takes an active stance in favor of sovereignty, i.e. collective freedom. The U.S. is almost the polar opposite: they take a very strong stance on individual freedom but make a mockery of collective freedom, as they violate countries' sovereignty as a matter of routine. Heck, they have entire agencies (like the National Endowment for Democracy) whose entire purpose is to violate countries' sovereignty. And in fact, often, they use individual freedom as an excuse to do so. Going back to my Titanic ideology, this means that China's vision is to ensure the ships remain under their captains' control, while the US focuses on the accommodations for individual passengers - even if that means drilling holes in other ships' hulls. It's almost a philosophical debate. How meaningful is individual freedom without the ability of a community to chart its own course? Europe needs to learn real fast that in today's world the answer is that if you can't steer your ship freely the whole thing will sink.

Arnaud Bertrand

99,717 просмотров • 1 год назад

VIDEO | Saint Petersburg, Russia: When asked about the evolving dynamics between Moscow and New Delhi while the world is watching very closely as he would be travelling to India for BRICS Summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin told PTI CEO and Editor-in-Chief Vijay Joshi: "You gave the description yourself and it is true, we enjoy special privileged strategic partnership, that is how I characterise this relationship, it did not occur yesterday or 1 or 5 years ago, this is something we have been working upon for decades, back in 1947, when the Soviet Union established diplomatic relations with Indian Republic, we have been doing everything to support the establishment of a new state, a new independent state, I'm glad to say that, thanks to the hard work and the talent of the Indian people, India has made great, and important achievements in its development. All those gathered here must know that India is one of the leading economies of the world, that shows the highest rate of economic growth, this is the result of hard work that the government has been doing under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi... This rate of development has been demonstrated by India while the strategies are implemented, formulated by Modi, as the head of the government of India. We are engaged in a lot of joint efforts, we hope that in upcoming years, we will reach USD 100 billion in mutual trade... We have all the foundations to work more actively and to reach more ambitious goals, and we are not only talking about our plans in energy, including nuclear energy, new platforms will emerge... We have one of the largest investment projects into the Indian economy... Everyone knows that India is very active in pharmaceutical industry, and our economic operators are ready to propose a lot of interesting projects... We have already outlined long perspective plans that are of interest both for India and Russia." Responding to the question of India-Russia relations in the redrawn geopolitical landscape, Russian President Vladimir Putin told, "I don't think this is a case. We are glad that India is developing its relations with all the countries, it's a great country, a large economy, the largest democracy, it is only natural that it develops economy in accordance with its interest with those countries that it deems necessary. Another thing is the US is trying to put pressure on India in some matters, for example, when it comes to cooperation with Russia. Everyone understands that putting pressure on Narendra Modi is detrimental for international relations, and for bilateral relations, doesn't matter from where this pressure comes from. We don't see any negative consequences... As of today, no serious repercussions emanating from the state of affairs, we are developing our ties with India, we deem India to be a reliable partner." (The full interaction between Russian President Vladimir Putin and PTI CEO and Editor-in-Chief Vijay Joshi is available at Source: AFP/PTI (to be used only in India) #VladimirPutin

VIDEO | Saint Petersburg, Russia: When asked about the evolving dynamics between Moscow and New Delhi while the world is watching very closely as he would be travelling to India for BRICS Summit, Russian President Vladimir Putin told PTI CEO and Editor-in-Chief Vijay Joshi: "You gave the description yourself and it is true, we enjoy special privileged strategic partnership, that is how I characterise this relationship, it did not occur yesterday or 1 or 5 years ago, this is something we have been working upon for decades, back in 1947, when the Soviet Union established diplomatic relations with Indian Republic, we have been doing everything to support the establishment of a new state, a new independent state, I'm glad to say that, thanks to the hard work and the talent of the Indian people, India has made great, and important achievements in its development. All those gathered here must know that India is one of the leading economies of the world, that shows the highest rate of economic growth, this is the result of hard work that the government has been doing under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi... This rate of development has been demonstrated by India while the strategies are implemented, formulated by Modi, as the head of the government of India. We are engaged in a lot of joint efforts, we hope that in upcoming years, we will reach USD 100 billion in mutual trade... We have all the foundations to work more actively and to reach more ambitious goals, and we are not only talking about our plans in energy, including nuclear energy, new platforms will emerge... We have one of the largest investment projects into the Indian economy... Everyone knows that India is very active in pharmaceutical industry, and our economic operators are ready to propose a lot of interesting projects... We have already outlined long perspective plans that are of interest both for India and Russia." Responding to the question of India-Russia relations in the redrawn geopolitical landscape, Russian President Vladimir Putin told, "I don't think this is a case. We are glad that India is developing its relations with all the countries, it's a great country, a large economy, the largest democracy, it is only natural that it develops economy in accordance with its interest with those countries that it deems necessary. Another thing is the US is trying to put pressure on India in some matters, for example, when it comes to cooperation with Russia. Everyone understands that putting pressure on Narendra Modi is detrimental for international relations, and for bilateral relations, doesn't matter from where this pressure comes from. We don't see any negative consequences... As of today, no serious repercussions emanating from the state of affairs, we are developing our ties with India, we deem India to be a reliable partner." (The full interaction between Russian President Vladimir Putin and PTI CEO and Editor-in-Chief Vijay Joshi is available at Source: AFP/PTI (to be used only in India) #VladimirPutin

Press Trust of India

19,004 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇮🇳🇫🇷 SORRY DONALD, THE DEAL IS FRENCH! India Rejects US Pressure & Locks in the RAFALE TSUNAMI! 🌊🤣 While President Trump was busy tweeting about tariffs and complaining that "Modi is not happy" with him, India quietly prepared the paperwork for the Deal of the Century... with France. 💅☕️ Reports confirm India is finalizing the acquisition of 114 Rafale Jets for the IAF AND 26 Rafale-M for the Navy. The "Art of the Deal" just got school’d by New Delhi. Why Uncle Sam is crying: 1. The American Rejection The US pushed the F-18 Super Hornet and F-21 hard. They threatened sanctions, complained about Russian oil, and slapped tariffs on us. India’s Response? "Seen 10: 00 PM." Left on read. We chose the jet that doesn't come with a 'User Manual' written by the US Congress. 2. The 'Made in India' Fortress This isn't just buying; it's owning. Tata Advanced Systems is setting up to build the bird here. 60% Value Retention in India. We aren't just flying them; we are building the ecosystem to replace them with our own AMCA later. 3. Total Dominance (The Two-Front Nightmare) China: Panicking because the Rafale-M on INS Vikrant means the Indian Ocean is a "No-Entry" zone. Pakistan: Already has PTSD from the Rafale sound barrier and the latest wrath in Operation sindoor. US: Realizing that "Strategic Autonomy" means you can't bully India into buying your jets. The Deal Breakdown- --> Navy: 26 Rafale-M (~₹63k Cr) for INS Vikrant. Immediate IOR control. China blocked. -->Air Force: 114 MRFA ALL Rafale jets. Why? Speed + Logistics. We know them, we rule with them. No drama. Macron is visiting next month to likely seal the deal. Trump can keep his tariffs; we’ll keep the best Omni-Role fighter in the world. Strategic Autonomy 1, Bullying 0. France has stood by India through THICK and THIN (1998 Nuclear tests, Kargil, Kashmir). The Ultimate deterrent is loading... Col AJ🇮🇳 Colonel Mayank Chaubey Aadi Achint 🇮🇳 Major Sammer Pal Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran) TheGlobalDecoder #India #France #Rafale #Trump #MakeInIndia #IndianNavy #IAF #INSVikrant #Modi #Macron

🇮🇳🇫🇷 SORRY DONALD, THE DEAL IS FRENCH! India Rejects US Pressure & Locks in the RAFALE TSUNAMI! 🌊🤣 While President Trump was busy tweeting about tariffs and complaining that "Modi is not happy" with him, India quietly prepared the paperwork for the Deal of the Century... with France. 💅☕️ Reports confirm India is finalizing the acquisition of 114 Rafale Jets for the IAF AND 26 Rafale-M for the Navy. The "Art of the Deal" just got school’d by New Delhi. Why Uncle Sam is crying: 1. The American Rejection The US pushed the F-18 Super Hornet and F-21 hard. They threatened sanctions, complained about Russian oil, and slapped tariffs on us. India’s Response? "Seen 10: 00 PM." Left on read. We chose the jet that doesn't come with a 'User Manual' written by the US Congress. 2. The 'Made in India' Fortress This isn't just buying; it's owning. Tata Advanced Systems is setting up to build the bird here. 60% Value Retention in India. We aren't just flying them; we are building the ecosystem to replace them with our own AMCA later. 3. Total Dominance (The Two-Front Nightmare) China: Panicking because the Rafale-M on INS Vikrant means the Indian Ocean is a "No-Entry" zone. Pakistan: Already has PTSD from the Rafale sound barrier and the latest wrath in Operation sindoor. US: Realizing that "Strategic Autonomy" means you can't bully India into buying your jets. The Deal Breakdown- --> Navy: 26 Rafale-M (~₹63k Cr) for INS Vikrant. Immediate IOR control. China blocked. -->Air Force: 114 MRFA ALL Rafale jets. Why? Speed + Logistics. We know them, we rule with them. No drama. Macron is visiting next month to likely seal the deal. Trump can keep his tariffs; we’ll keep the best Omni-Role fighter in the world. Strategic Autonomy 1, Bullying 0. France has stood by India through THICK and THIN (1998 Nuclear tests, Kargil, Kashmir). The Ultimate deterrent is loading... Col AJ🇮🇳 Colonel Mayank Chaubey Aadi Achint 🇮🇳 Major Sammer Pal Toorr (Infantry Combat Veteran) TheGlobalDecoder #India #France #Rafale #Trump #MakeInIndia #IndianNavy #IAF #INSVikrant #Modi #Macron

The Sacred Scroll

2,203,339 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Hegseth’s message to Europe could hardly be clearer: the US is pivoting toward the Asian model of alliance management - pragmatic, interest-driven, and results-oriented - rather than the old European model of values-based diplomacy laced with moralizing and lectures on human rights and the “rules-based order.” For Asian countries (Singapore, Philippines, etc.), relations with the US have always been structured more on common interests than common values. Singapore and Asian states are pragmatic and are willing to work with whoever occupies the White House because America’s role as the balancer in Asia remains indispensable. Even non-aligned countries such as India and former adversaries such as Vietnam now recognize this. They appreciate hard power and credible deterrence more than pretty speeches, which is perfectly in line with the US's new national security strategy. Managing the South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and other hotspots requires credible deterrence and military capability far more than human rights resolutions. Asia’s focus on this aligns with the need to impose costs on revisionist behavior. Basing your foreign policy on human rights and democracy, you risk losing nations that don't exactly hold the American variant of democracy in high regard. Hegseth praised “model allies” who are “capable, clear-eyed, and ready to defend their national interests.” His use of "clear-eyed" is important here. It means that to be an ally, you must agree on what the threat is. That should be the starting point. From there, national interests converge. Note how European "allies" diverge from this framework. You have many European nations now characterizing the US as the threat to the global order instead. This is the opposite of clear-eyedness. In a world where China presents a serious, long-term challenge to the regional order, utility and resolve matter more than shared ideology. Asia adapted after the collapse of the TPP by building CPTPP and RCEP; it managed Trump’s hard-power instincts and Biden’s style alike by staying focused on interests. The US, facing its own fiscal and strategic realities, is now explicitly choosing to reward and prioritize that same pragmatism. Western Europe would indeed do well to take note.

Hegseth’s message to Europe could hardly be clearer: the US is pivoting toward the Asian model of alliance management - pragmatic, interest-driven, and results-oriented - rather than the old European model of values-based diplomacy laced with moralizing and lectures on human rights and the “rules-based order.” For Asian countries (Singapore, Philippines, etc.), relations with the US have always been structured more on common interests than common values. Singapore and Asian states are pragmatic and are willing to work with whoever occupies the White House because America’s role as the balancer in Asia remains indispensable. Even non-aligned countries such as India and former adversaries such as Vietnam now recognize this. They appreciate hard power and credible deterrence more than pretty speeches, which is perfectly in line with the US's new national security strategy. Managing the South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, and other hotspots requires credible deterrence and military capability far more than human rights resolutions. Asia’s focus on this aligns with the need to impose costs on revisionist behavior. Basing your foreign policy on human rights and democracy, you risk losing nations that don't exactly hold the American variant of democracy in high regard. Hegseth praised “model allies” who are “capable, clear-eyed, and ready to defend their national interests.” His use of "clear-eyed" is important here. It means that to be an ally, you must agree on what the threat is. That should be the starting point. From there, national interests converge. Note how European "allies" diverge from this framework. You have many European nations now characterizing the US as the threat to the global order instead. This is the opposite of clear-eyedness. In a world where China presents a serious, long-term challenge to the regional order, utility and resolve matter more than shared ideology. Asia adapted after the collapse of the TPP by building CPTPP and RCEP; it managed Trump’s hard-power instincts and Biden’s style alike by staying focused on interests. The US, facing its own fiscal and strategic realities, is now explicitly choosing to reward and prioritize that same pragmatism. Western Europe would indeed do well to take note.

Melissa Chen

95,979 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад