Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

additional context (also keep in mind JSTLK heavily involved himself with Destiny's lawsuit) hes at a level that's just beyond his coverage because of the lawsuit involvement and the mass-reporting admission.

Leigha_Sapienti's profile picture

Leigha Sapienti

4,140 subscribers

12,726 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

YouTube Creator LUS covers Kick Streamer Destiny's motion for summary judgment on his lawsuit with Doe Plaintiff (Pxie) It seems her deposition didn't go well, which resulted in possibly the summary judgment filing, as she stated in her deposition and confirmed that she wasn't aware that Destiny factually transmitted the video of her (that was leaked) to any third party after the effective date of CARD II statute. Destiny's lawyer is stating that, with this admission from her, the court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. And is asking the judge to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice.
3:50

YouTube Creator LUS covers Kick Streamer Destiny's motion for summary judgment on his lawsuit with Doe Plaintiff (Pxie) It seems her deposition didn't go well, which resulted in possibly the summary judgment filing, as she stated in her deposition and confirmed that she wasn't aware that Destiny factually transmitted the video of her (that was leaked) to any third party after the effective date of CARD II statute. Destiny's lawyer is stating that, with this admission from her, the court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. And is asking the judge to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice.

Leigha Sapienti

53,584 views • 2 months ago

🚨JSTLK SELF-VICTIMIZING⁉️ after the debate with Dickers (Dickers) and Aiden (aiden | AG4L), JSTLK (jstlk) says he is willing to "sacrifice his career" or even "be k*lled" for his right to "snark" here's what JSTLK means by "snark" btw: - joining the lawsuit against destiny - platforming kellyjean going directly after destiny's gf by weaponizing leaked p*rn of her shared on destiny's kiwif*rms - defending ppl contacting anyone around destiny to get him removed from events - saying the FEDs should look into destiny and advocating him be "locked up" - advocating reporting destiny's kick/youtube publicly and directly engaging in it privately - saying he's going to sue destiny for d*xing ppl - has an editor who threatened r*pe toward Ukrainian Ana, a woman being actively bombed in a war, for not disavowing destiny - sticking by a community member with a history of stalking/harassing women, even after the community member found rose's emails through data-breach d*x sites in order to contact everyone around her IRL is this what JSTLK means when he says "coverage"? 😇
1:26

🚨JSTLK SELF-VICTIMIZING⁉️ after the debate with Dickers (Dickers) and Aiden (aiden | AG4L), JSTLK (jstlk) says he is willing to "sacrifice his career" or even "be k*lled" for his right to "snark" here's what JSTLK means by "snark" btw: - joining the lawsuit against destiny - platforming kellyjean going directly after destiny's gf by weaponizing leaked p*rn of her shared on destiny's kiwif*rms - defending ppl contacting anyone around destiny to get him removed from events - saying the FEDs should look into destiny and advocating him be "locked up" - advocating reporting destiny's kick/youtube publicly and directly engaging in it privately - saying he's going to sue destiny for d*xing ppl - has an editor who threatened r*pe toward Ukrainian Ana, a woman being actively bombed in a war, for not disavowing destiny - sticking by a community member with a history of stalking/harassing women, even after the community member found rose's emails through data-breach d*x sites in order to contact everyone around her IRL is this what JSTLK means when he says "coverage"? 😇

blvckcat🎀

59,499 views • 1 month ago

Drake has been in 3 public beefs and in both Pusha T and Meek Mill beefs there was no label involvement. The reason why there’s a lawsuit with UMG is because the label got involved in promoting Kendrick’s smear campaign to defame him with pedophile allegations. It’s that simple.
5:03

Drake has been in 3 public beefs and in both Pusha T and Meek Mill beefs there was no label involvement. The reason why there’s a lawsuit with UMG is because the label got involved in promoting Kendrick’s smear campaign to defame him with pedophile allegations. It’s that simple.

Akademiks TV

415,719 views • 1 year ago

Commentary snark streamer JSTLK has no idea what he did wrong for Political Streamer Destiny to sue him. What does talking to Pxie's lawyer have to do with your coverage on YouTube and on Kick? Why do you feel the need to directly talk to her lawyer? JSTLK theory crafts and suggests that this potential lawsuit is to eventually get damning evidence on JSTLK, because Destiny "has nothing" for his manifesto.
1:00

Commentary snark streamer JSTLK has no idea what he did wrong for Political Streamer Destiny to sue him. What does talking to Pxie's lawyer have to do with your coverage on YouTube and on Kick? Why do you feel the need to directly talk to her lawyer? JSTLK theory crafts and suggests that this potential lawsuit is to eventually get damning evidence on JSTLK, because Destiny "has nothing" for his manifesto.

Leigha Sapienti

16,159 views • 1 month ago

In the CM Punk interview he finally addressed something that was omitted from the rivalry with Seth and that’s the fact Punk distanced himself from everyone because of the WWE lawsuit.
0:58

In the CM Punk interview he finally addressed something that was omitted from the rivalry with Seth and that’s the fact Punk distanced himself from everyone because of the WWE lawsuit.

Teffo

384,077 views • 1 year ago

There's a lot of online spin about Jonathan Majors and his legal situation, so I was happy to speak with LiveNow from Fox about what actually happened w/ his settlement in Grace Jabbari's defamation and assault lawsuit. The lawsuit was dismissed because he settled with Jabbari.
6:44

There's a lot of online spin about Jonathan Majors and his legal situation, so I was happy to speak with LiveNow from Fox about what actually happened w/ his settlement in Grace Jabbari's defamation and assault lawsuit. The lawsuit was dismissed because he settled with Jabbari.

Meghann Cuniff

60,119 views • 1 year ago

Reporter: Just explain the computer login issue. Your lawsuit contends that you were not able to log in to the system. Kash Patel: The problem with you and your baseless reporting is an absolute lie. I was never locked out of my systems. Reporter: The lawsuit says the opposite.
1:33

Reporter: Just explain the computer login issue. Your lawsuit contends that you were not able to log in to the system. Kash Patel: The problem with you and your baseless reporting is an absolute lie. I was never locked out of my systems. Reporter: The lawsuit says the opposite.

Blue Georgia

546,830 views • 2 months ago

“I’m suing Harvard because I’m the victim of a crime—and I want to see justice—but I’m also suing Harvard because I want to save Harvard. And I think legal pressure will lead to some of the changes that Harvard needs to make.” —Yoav Segev Segev was one of the Jewish students intimidated and harangued on campus in the months after October 7. Segev is now the plaintiff in a civil-rights lawsuit against the school. His lawsuit lays out what he calls Harvard’s “institutional-level acceptance of antisemitism.” Watch the full livestream:
1:10

“I’m suing Harvard because I’m the victim of a crime—and I want to see justice—but I’m also suing Harvard because I want to save Harvard. And I think legal pressure will lead to some of the changes that Harvard needs to make.” —Yoav Segev Segev was one of the Jewish students intimidated and harangued on campus in the months after October 7. Segev is now the plaintiff in a civil-rights lawsuit against the school. His lawsuit lays out what he calls Harvard’s “institutional-level acceptance of antisemitism.” Watch the full livestream:

The Free Press

18,490 views • 11 months ago

A new lawsuit filed Wednesday alleges that some U.S. technology companies have supplied Iran and Russia with microchips that have been used in missiles and drones that are being routinely fired at Ukraine. The lawsuit cites previous reporting by PBS News special correspondent Simon Ostrovsky about the KH-101 missile, which contained microchips from Texas Instruments — one of the companies named in the suit. He gives us the latest on the lawsuit and what's next.
3:38

A new lawsuit filed Wednesday alleges that some U.S. technology companies have supplied Iran and Russia with microchips that have been used in missiles and drones that are being routinely fired at Ukraine. The lawsuit cites previous reporting by PBS News special correspondent Simon Ostrovsky about the KH-101 missile, which contained microchips from Texas Instruments — one of the companies named in the suit. He gives us the latest on the lawsuit and what's next.

PBS News

45,471 views • 7 months ago

Huge lawsuit on this one. 👀 They arrested the wrong guy. Even after he identified himself and they knew by his age that he was not the person on the warrant, they still continued with the arrest. This ended up in a lawsuit that awarded him 600k.
0:57

Huge lawsuit on this one. 👀 They arrested the wrong guy. Even after he identified himself and they knew by his age that he was not the person on the warrant, they still continued with the arrest. This ended up in a lawsuit that awarded him 600k.

Chuckling Charlie

73,708 views • 3 months ago

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST SLAPPED THE NEW YORK TIMES WITH A TREASON CHARGE — AND HE’S MAKING IT HURT! The Corrupt and Failing NYT’s fake coverage of a battered and beat up Iran is now being folded straight into his multi-billion dollar lawsuit. Trump didn’t hold back — he called them out as criminals pushing made-up facts and ridiculous reporting. This is the accountability patriots have been demanding for years. The legacy media machine that twists narratives to protect the wrong side is finally facing real consequences instead of free passes. Trump is fighting back and draining the swamp of lies one lawsuit at a time.
1:00

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST SLAPPED THE NEW YORK TIMES WITH A TREASON CHARGE — AND HE’S MAKING IT HURT! The Corrupt and Failing NYT’s fake coverage of a battered and beat up Iran is now being folded straight into his multi-billion dollar lawsuit. Trump didn’t hold back — he called them out as criminals pushing made-up facts and ridiculous reporting. This is the accountability patriots have been demanding for years. The legacy media machine that twists narratives to protect the wrong side is finally facing real consequences instead of free passes. Trump is fighting back and draining the swamp of lies one lawsuit at a time.

QThestorm

34,824 views • 27 days ago

20-year-old disfigured man wanted for murder has turned himself in and notified the judge that he's filing a lawsuit because he's innocent 😳👀
0:29

20-year-old disfigured man wanted for murder has turned himself in and notified the judge that he's filing a lawsuit because he's innocent 😳👀

Daily Loud

214,596 views • 11 months ago

[Let's Debate] I am sure you have seen this video going around. I will add additional context and you decide if the oficer used excessive force and how this incident could have been avoided: In Bountiful, Utah, USA, a 64-year-old woman filed a $1 million lawsuit against a police officer who punched her in the face(should it have been more $), breaking her jaw during an arrest. The incident occurred in 2023 when the woman was accused of interfering with a police investigation and being disorderly. The officer involved in the incident was reprimanded with a written reprimand. Following the lawsuit, the woman's charges of interference and disorderly conduct were dropped. The case has raised concerns about police use of force, particularly against older individuals, and has sparked a debate about the appropriate consequences for officers who engage in excessive force. The outcome of the lawsuit is pending, and the case is still under investigation.
4:42

[Let's Debate] I am sure you have seen this video going around. I will add additional context and you decide if the oficer used excessive force and how this incident could have been avoided: In Bountiful, Utah, USA, a 64-year-old woman filed a $1 million lawsuit against a police officer who punched her in the face(should it have been more $), breaking her jaw during an arrest. The incident occurred in 2023 when the woman was accused of interfering with a police investigation and being disorderly. The officer involved in the incident was reprimanded with a written reprimand. Following the lawsuit, the woman's charges of interference and disorderly conduct were dropped. The case has raised concerns about police use of force, particularly against older individuals, and has sparked a debate about the appropriate consequences for officers who engage in excessive force. The outcome of the lawsuit is pending, and the case is still under investigation.

BiffBifford™ 🇺🇸

3,470,097 views • 2 years ago

A humanoid robot capable of crushing skulls? Figure AI sued by former executive. Robert Gruendel, former chief product safety engineer at Figure AI, has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that he was retaliatoryly fired after reporting robot safety risks to Figure AI executives. The lawsuit claims that the engineer warned the company that its humanoid robots possessed a dangerous capability "capable of crushing a human skull." The report cites a specific incident where a robot malfunctioned and scratched a steel refrigerator door with a mark approximately ¼ inch long. The lawsuit also alleges that the company used its safety roadmap as a factor in attracting investment during fundraising and valuation, but subsequently "weakened" its implementation. Figure AI's valuation surged by approximately $39 billion between 2024 and 2025, and this lawsuit comes at a time of rapid expansion and high public attention.
0:50

A humanoid robot capable of crushing skulls? Figure AI sued by former executive. Robert Gruendel, former chief product safety engineer at Figure AI, has filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that he was retaliatoryly fired after reporting robot safety risks to Figure AI executives. The lawsuit claims that the engineer warned the company that its humanoid robots possessed a dangerous capability "capable of crushing a human skull." The report cites a specific incident where a robot malfunctioned and scratched a steel refrigerator door with a mark approximately ¼ inch long. The lawsuit also alleges that the company used its safety roadmap as a factor in attracting investment during fundraising and valuation, but subsequently "weakened" its implementation. Figure AI's valuation surged by approximately $39 billion between 2024 and 2025, and this lawsuit comes at a time of rapid expansion and high public attention.

CyberRobo

39,981 views • 7 months ago