Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Additional milestones highlighted include: - The first NSITF pension review in 21 years, increasing some monthly pensions from ₦18,000 to ₦206,000—an increase of over 1,000%, with all arrears fully paid. - Three pension increases within 24 months, including the 22% Pension Boost, the ₦32,000 monthly consequential adjustment, and over...

41,959 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This conversation has generated a fair bit of conversation so I think it’s worth elaborating on. There is a common misconception that superannuation is decreasing the number of retirees on the pension. As per ASFA figures attached in comments - the median balance for men and women aged 60-64 is $220k and $164k respectively. That is nowhere near enough to get off the full pension which starts to reduce when a home owning single person has assets of $321k. The pension cuts out entirely if a home owning single person has assets of $714k. In other words, well over half of people about to retire have barely half the level of assets needed to get off the full pension. This is worse than when Superannuation began in 1992 when 77% of retirees were receiving a pension. 50% were receiving a full pension and 27% were receiving a part pension. Furthermore as per the ABS figures attached in comments below, 40% of people now retiree with a mortgage up from 10% in 1992. These figures are over five years old so the figure is probably worse. That means that most people have to cash in their super when they retire to pay off their mortgage and then go onto the pension anyway. Then there is the whole return on investment scenario - if house prices are growing the same as or faster than superannuation returns, then yet again it becomes a false economy. In other words Superannuation is not achieving its stated aim. The Productivity Commission estimates the cost of running Superannuation is around 1% of funds under management or $40 billion per year. Australia doesn’t need more financial engineers in this country, we need real engineers building real assets not paper assets. Nor should we be investing superannuation money overseas in foreign infrastructure when our own country desperately needs more infrastructure investment.

Gerard Rennick

44,183 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi had in January 2025 approved the establishment of the 8th Central Pay Commission (CPC) to revise the salaries and benefits of Central Government employees and pensioners. All Central Government pensioners who had retired before 1.1.2016 are receiving pension at par with employees who retired after 1.1.2016. Keeping in view the recommendations which were made by the 6th CPC, a distinction among pensioners is inevitable and that is what is being brought in as an amendment and by way of validation. The validation rules DO NOT, in any way, change or alter the existing pensions so fixed of existing Civil Pensioners from the present stage. The validation rules also DO NOT affect Defense Pensioners in any way as they are covered by separate rules. It is not an amendment to any pension Rules or instructions but only a reaffirmation of the same w.e.f. 1st June, 1972, i.e. the date the CCS (Pension) Rules were promulgated. The 6th Central Pay Commission made a distinction between the retirees of pre-1.1.2006 and those of post-1.1.2006 periods. The then-Government (Congress-led UPA) had accepted the recommendations of 6th Central Pay Commission and decided that there will be a distinction between pensioners with reference to the cut-off date of 1.1.2006. The 7th Central Pay Commission has brought in parity between pre 1.1.2016 and post 1.1.2016 Pensioners. I again reiterate that this is only a Validation of existing rules. This DOES NOT alter or change existing civil or defense pension. - Smt Nirmala Sitharaman in Rajya Sabha

Nirmala Sitharaman Office

39,610 просмотров • 1 год назад

#WATCH | Delhi | On Supreme Court grants full pension to women SSC Officers denied permanent commission, Advocate SS Pandey says, “Today, Supreme Court has passed a historical order, the bench was presided by the CJI, in respect of women officers of all the three services – Army, Navy and Air Force. The SC has recognised the fact that since women officers were not being considered for PC, the inputs to derive the merits of the women officers have not been done properly because the reporting officers were not conscious of the fact that these Annual Confidential Reports and other credentials would be used for consideration of PC for the women officers… In the Army, the SC has already found that the women officers have been subjected to systemic discrimination through the cases of Babita Punia and Nitisha… The SC clearly held that all those officers who have completed 60% of qualifying service and were clear from the PC and vigilance angle will be considered and granted PC. The officers who have been victims of systemic discrimination will be permitted to serve for 20 years and will be given a pension on completion of 20 years… In the Air Force’s case, the consideration denied earlier was based on a 2019 policy in which the inputs that were taken into consideration were those that women officers could not have earned during their service. As a result, they were denied PC. Both the male and female officers have been granted consideration for PC or pension… The same goes with the Navy because it was also following a policy of no PC to either men or women… They have also been considered for PC… “

ANI

39,804 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Catherine Austin Fitts: "You think DOD is going to say, 'Oh, guess what, nobody gets any retirement. We stole [$20 trillion of taxpayer money]...&...sent it to Basel, Switzerland'?" "The pandemic was a military operation...implemented by the people who stole the $20 trillion." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts ), is taken from an interview with Dr. Jane Ruby (DR JANE RUBY™️) posted to The Dr. Jane Ruby Rumble channel today, June 18, 2025. For reference, Fitts is describing how she and MSU professor Mark Skidmore discovered that the Department of Defense has stolen at least $20+ TRILLION of U.S. taxpayer money. (That number was as of 2015, and it is likely much larger now.) Fitts notes that the DOD was also in charge of "the pandemic" here in the U.S. and that COVID—including the supposed "vaccines" for the disease (see full interview)—have been used to lower life expectancy in order to avoid a reckoning regarding Americans' missing pension money. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The moment they started the financial coup, they started to implement policies that made life expectancy go down. Because if you can't balance the budget by putting more funding behind the retirement system, the only way you can balance the— Well, you can, you can extend retirement, the date of retirement, or you can lower life expectancy, or both. But that's— You have to— if the population and the Congress refuse to do the financially responsible thing, then your only other choice is to is to lower life expectancy. "He [Mark Skidmore] was like, I don't understand what you're talking about. So when the pandemic hit, I knew exactly what it was. Because if the pandemic was a military operation, it is being implemented by the people who stole the $20 trillion. "Do you really think that DOD is going to say, 'Oh, guess what, nobody gets any retirement. We stole all the money... and we sent it to Basel, Switzerland'? Or wherever they've got a stockpile, or we sent it offshore, we send it wherever the money went, whatever it funded. "The American people, if you're the President of the United States, every day, every week, the primary dealers working with the New York Fed go out and borrow money. So they sell treasury bonds and treasury bills to your IRAs and your retirement accounts and your pension funds. Okay. So I sell a treasury bond to a pension fund. And so you work all your life, you put your cash in your pension fund. The pension fund buys a Treasury bond, the money goes into treasury, the bank account at the New York Fed for Treasury. And then it disappears out the back door. "When Dr. Skidmore documented and published a study in 2017 that 21 trillion was missing, the outstanding debt of the United States at that moment was 21 trillion. The balance sheet. So do we have too much debt or do we have a bank robbery? "But here's the thing. As a citizen now, my pension fund is not an asset, it's an IOU for myself as a taxpayer. So I've put cash into my pension fund, and my cash has been converted to an IOU that I owe myself as a taxpayer, without your consent. Because the bonds have a call on all of our assets. "If you're the Department of Defense, do you really want to tell somebody, oh, you know, we disappeared 20 trillion of your money, and so, you know, so the question is, how do you manage that situation? Anyway, so, yeah, you know, if DOD stole your money, I think it was, you know, that money disappeared out of DoD accounts at the New York Fed...."

Sense Receptor

151,758 просмотров • 1 год назад

Surreal exchange with Sunak Janet Street-Porter, "Why do you hate pensioners? That's the only conclusion I can come to as a result of the spring budget" Janet Street-Porter "You lowered National Insurance by 4p.. Big deal.. Pensioners don't pay NI.. Then you froze the tax threshold.. So yes you gave us more pension, but that leaves a gap of only £1,000 before the basic average pension to the threshold to paid tax" "So many pensioners are living in poverty, around 2,000,000. Most are living in private rental accommodation.. So there's an argument that pensioners have come our worse" *Rishi Sunak is smirking as she says this* "Worse under the Tories, worse under you. As a pensioner, what I see is are pensioners who would like to take extra jobs to make ends meet, to buy little treats, to go out once a month, to put petrol in the car" *Rishi Sunak takes a sip from his mug* "But if they earn any money. More than £1,000 a year, and go above that threshold, they're going to be paying tax. Now does that seem right?" Rishi Sunak, "So, Janet, I care deeply about pensioners.. It's really important to me personally.. It was a Conservative government that introduced the triple lock" Janet Street Porter, "I'm not criticising that" Rishi Sunak, "We've protected the triple lock.. That means the state pension has gone up by £900" Janet Street Porter, "I know, but so has the cost of basic living.. You have supplied pension credit, but, there's so many people never claimed them" Rishi Sunak, "All pensioners recieved double their winter fuel payments.. State pension has gone up by £900, far greater than inflation and price rises.. About that pensioner who wants to earn that little bit extra, they don't pay National Insurance.. So they aren't paying tax on that work" Janet Street Porter, "Well they are.." *Rishi Sunak talks over her so she cant repeat the point she just made about earning above the threshold and having to pay tax*

Farrukh

1,107,165 просмотров • 2 лет назад

As the mechanism for staking $vITLG to receive $ITL approaches, winning strategies and models are being developed to maximize accumulated assets and their value. One winning model I will apply in my first migration will be shared with the community shortly. This model ensures users receive a steady monthly income for 180 months while optimizing the conversion rate from $vITLG to $ITL. Specifically: Assuming the $vITLG balance I receive in my first migration is A. 50% of this balance will be locked for 5 years and vested for 120 months to maximize monthly benefits starting from the 5th year onwards. The remaining 50%, let's call it B, will be allocated as follows: B/2 will be locked for 0 years and vested for 24 months. B/4 will be locked for 1 year and vested for 24 months. B/8 will be locked for 2 years and vested for 48 months. B/16 will be locked for 3 years and vested for 60 months. The remaining B will be locked for 4 years and vested for 84 months. In this way, the $ITL balance you receive monthly will progressively increase over time, while in the initial phase you can still own $ITL to experience the ecosystem. This solution provides you with a tool for distributing $ITL monthly for 15 years with a maximized rate. Of course, this is just the first migration; in the future, the system will implement further migrations. If you apply this distribution model, the amount of $ITL you receive monthly will gradually increase over time, along with the value of $ITL as the network grows. The above is a strategy for designing a passive income stream linked to the system's growth. Of course, you can lock in 100% for 5 years to optimize profits. This is not considered financial advice; please consider carefully before making your decision. Have a great weekend. #Interlink #ITL #ITLG

Vyx Interlink

24,822 просмотров • 1 месяц назад