Adnan Rashid Is A Terrible Historian

“What kind of historian is this guy?” The same kind that you previously invited on your podcast and praised. The same kind that you tried to utilise in the propagation of your beliefs before I publicly corrected you. It seems that when you perceive someone to hold the same position as you, you’re willing to praise them and utilise them. As soon as they disagree with you, you resort to bad language and attempting to tarnish their image. Your attempt to discredit only highlights your own reality. إن الله يدٰفع عن الذين ءامنوا

@Haqiqatjou Are you stupid? Saddam was a Baathi Kafir, you just made him Sunni to cover for your Kafir Rafidi friends.

He's a sectarian wahhabi masquerading as a historian. When asked to prove his credentials, he failed miserably. Have a look:

Pathetic from Daniel, Saddam is a secular baathi dictator who killed everybody who opposed him regardless of sunni/shia

You'd do anything to defend your Shia friends

imagine wasting your akhira over assad and the fake axis

Saddam killed roughly the same percentage of Sunni and Shia. Source: Me Marine -> historian It only appears that he focused on one group over the other… He merely oscillated between them. @MrAdnanRashid is accurate here.

So Daniel is a crypto shi'i? Let's jump to conclusions the same way he does.

Wow Daniel Rafidajouu is truly showing his colors.

Are u retarded? He’s talking about post-saddam. And saddam was takfir’d by most Muslims and fought him themselves