Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Afghanist Pashtun diaspora: - The middle one talks about being whitewashed and bleached with his bleached blonde hair. They complain (envy) when Tajiks and Iranians share ethnic, cultural and linguistic ties within the Persianate civilization. - The woman mentions decolonization. She isn't the only Afghaniyat Pashtun that views themselves...

69,860 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 6

Фото профиля Koroush RP
Koroush RP2 лет назад

They dont want to be Persian, Tajiks and Hazaras are Persian, speak Persian and thats their cultural and linguistic identity. These pashtuns are so afraid of Persian unity its unreal.

Фото профиля #FreeAfghanistan
#FreeAfghanistan2 лет назад

They are eating Bolani and doogh (Shamali famous dishes) and not shaming that they are mocking Persian and Tajiks.

Фото профиля Koroush RP
Koroush RP2 лет назад

Why are pashtuns so obsessed with Persians and Iranians? I really wish they could stop speaking our language and trying to always be a part of us and go do their own thing. Their inferiority complex is so bizzare. Literally if an Iranian or a Tajik farts they gossip over it

Фото профиля Nas
Nas2 лет назад

They have created a whole show to talk all this nonsense about the Persian speakers? How pathetic.

Фото профиля Sohrab BAKHSHI
Sohrab BAKHSHI2 лет назад

Whoever you are👌 keep it up👍 Thank you👊 your sense of humor and how you see the matters are interesting.

Фото профиля Jamal Balkhi
Jamal Balkhi2 лет назад

As much as I despise you as you and your racism against Pashtuns, I have to agree that diaspora Afghans are the worst, especially these Cali ones

Похожие видео

Who Are The Tajiks: Past & Present Australian Network Interview of Professor Richard Foltz - Tajiks are Iranians of the East. - 3 Million Tajiks registered officially in Russia. Millions more unregistered. - 16th Century Shia-Sunni schism divided the Iranian world, with Persians in contemporary Iran being Shia, and Persians in Afghanistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan being Sunni. - the Ethnic, Heritage and Cultural ties still bind east and west Iranians. - Nowruz is a worldwide Tajik/Persian cultural festival that's celebrated from Mongolia to Bosnia. - The largest group of Tajiks is in Khorasan (currently Talibanistan/Afghanistan), comprising of 40-50% of the people. - Economic and cultural capitals of Tajik civilization Samarqand, Bukhara and Ferghana were taken from Tajiks by the Bolsheviks and given to Turkic nomads. Similar to how Tajik majority Khorasan was given to Indic nomads by the British. - 30-50% of Uzbekistan is Tajik but the Uzbek government prevents a census to hide figures. (Similar to Afghan governments preventing a census to hide Tajik numbers.) - The most famous poet of the world today is a Tajik/Persian (Rumi). - Tajik/Persian/Iranian heritage goes back to over 3,000 years. - In the 10th century, Tajik Bukhara outpaced Baghdad as the major centre of Islamic learning. - Tajiks/Persians/Iranians were the custodians of Islamic civilization, institutions, culture and education. - Uzbeks were pastoral nomads that were slowly urbanized and Islamized by the Tajiks. - The Bolsheviks were on a mission to sabotage this historic past and displace it all. - The Uzbeks were a cultural and historic blank page that the Bolsheviks could write whatever they wanted on. 'Uzbek' became a national identity due to Soviet social engineering. - Land, heritage and culture belonging to Tajiks, was taken from Tajiks and given to Uzbeks. (Similar to what the British did with handing over Tajik Persianate civilization to nomadic Afghans from the Indian subcontinent).

Hello, PhD

20,516 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I upset the Orthobros on here when I posted that the Wilsons aren’t Christian. They said “how dare you declare whether or not someone is a Christian!” Here is my response (watch til the end for the most ironic part of all of this): Scripture itself tells us that it is OBVIOUS who is saved and that we can discern who is and who is not a child of God. “By this the children of God and the children of the devil are OBVIOUS: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother and sister.” 1 John 3:10 Yes, Christians will still continue to sin, as Romans 7 tell us. Sanctification is certainly messy, there’s no denying that. But someone who has been supernaturally made new by the Holy Spirit will have a real heart change. Regeneration is not an inconsequential experience. It will be obvious to people. The supernatural work of the Holy Spirit is a powerful one. Someone who is made a child of God will bear the family resemblance. No one can be born again and continue to comfortably stay in the mud with the pigs. They might occasionally still fall into the mud, they might still have dirt on their clothes even after they get up, but they will hate it when they do and will live in a humble manner before God crying “have mercy on me, a sinner.” They will pursue righteousness and have a deep deep love for others. And when they are confronted about their sin by others, they repent. So yes, we can look at someone living in a hateful unrighteous arrogant manner for years on end, even after being confronted about it, and determine that they are not of the Lord.

Lizzie Marbach

45,848 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

"Men do not stay for platitudes. Platitudes do not carry a soul through the winter. When the child is in the ground, when the marriage is in ruins, when the diagnosis comes back and the floor drops out of the world, no one was ever held up by 'be kind and stay positive.' They are held, if they are held at all, by something with iron in it. By a witness that the heavens are real and open, that God still speaks, that the dead are not lost, that there is power on the earth greater than the darkness. The early Saints had that, and they knew they had it, because they had felt it in their own bodies. They were healed under hands. They spoke in tongues. They saw visions and buried their children in the certainty of resurrection and crossed a continent on the strength of a fire they could not have faked. That is what converts a man and that is what keeps him, not a well managed self-help program, but the living evidence that what we preach is true. So the cure is not complicated, and it is not new. It is to be again the Church of our fathers. Stop apologizing. Stop trimming the glorious truth into something the world will pat on the head. Speak with authority and with the hammer, the way Joseph spoke, the way Brigham spoke, the way men speak when they actually believe the heavens have opened over them. Reach again for the gifts of the Spirit, and stop pretending they were a founding era curiosity, because a testimony built on argument crumbles in the first storm and a testimony built on the manifest power of God does not. And above all, live as though the heavens are open, because they are, and they have only ever felt closed to a people who stopped expecting them to answer. The Saints are not leaving because the gospel is too much. They are leaving because we have made it too little. Make it glorious and demanding again, and watch who comes back through the door. The hungry have not gone anywhere. We simply stopped setting the table."

Kirk Rollins

63,131 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The BBC and the British press will never get over the fact that all their attempts to diminish and break this woman, from the time she was simply a 23 year old courting the Future King of the UK, to now as the Future Queen Consort of the UK, all failed. Out of ALL the Royal Women in the World and in the BRF, Catherine is ONLY one they single out to call her by a nickname and her maiden name🤡 "Kate Middleton" is NOT even her name; It was NEVER her name. She was born and raised "Catherine Elizabeth Middleton". She always introduces herself as "Catherine". "Kate" is a childhood nickname used by her family and friends. Are you her family? are your her friend?🤡 So the BBC saying "Kate", who is "Kate"?🤡 The level of disrespect and familiarity is off the chart and that is why you do not allow this familiarity with people from the get-go. How hard is it to call someone by their given name? Why is she the only one singled out ? Because, my dears, They cannot get over the fact that Catherine has never and will never lower herself to play their media games and give her any access to herself or her family🔥 Catherine, just like William, are organically popular, they have never needed the press to hype them up or do PR for them. The press has zero control over them and that is what they are punishing Catherine for. And you wonder why Prince William treats the British press like with the "detached contempt" he does ?🤡 They can try but they cannot diminish Catherine. In Life, there are women who need crowns and titles to feel like Royalty. But Catherine is of the breed of women who naturally exude all the attribute of a Queen. Just look at her and you see Royalty personified. No one, not even blood royals, have her natural grace, elegance, poise and pull with the British Public. No one. You cannot teach her level of grace, you are born with it or not😌 Catherine never made a fuss about Titles because she is a woman who knows who she is and where she is going in Life and that is why she will keep shining for being herself, and the BBC will keep covering her so they can feed their children and pay their bills☕️ #CatherineTheGreat #PrincessofWales 📹 Kensington Palace

Canellecitadelle

226,964 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"A priest’s testimony: "If Islam is violent as they claim, no Christian or Jew would have survived the early muslim conquest!" In this touching and peaceful message, Father Elias Zahlawi, a Christian priest from Damascus, Syria, speaks from the heart about the true face of Islam. He reminds the world that what many in the West call “Muslim terrorism” has nothing to do with Islam — a faith that has always promoted coexistence, compassion, and respect for all humanity. Born and raised among both Christians and Muslims, Father Elias shares his personal experience of friendship, harmony, and brotherhood in the land where these faiths have lived side by side for centuries. This short speech is not just a statement — it’s a testimony of truth and peace from a man who has lived it. Quran 60:8. As for those who have not fought against you for your religion, nor expelled you from your homes, God does not prohibit you from dealing with them kindly and equitably. God loves the equitable. Quran 5:82-83 82. You will find that the people most hostile towards the believers are the Jews and the polytheists. And you will find that the nearest in affection towards the believers are those who say, “We are Christians.” That is because among them are priests and monks, and they are not arrogant. 83. And when they hear what was revealed to the Messenger, you see their eyes overflowing with tears, as they recognize the truth in it. They say, “Our Lord, we have believed, so count us among the witnesses.”"

Idris

49,198 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just *Pow* in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? *Like, I mean, pow,* He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

Terri Green

132,141 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад