正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Afghanist Pashtun diaspora: - The middle one talks about being whitewashed and bleached with his bleached blonde hair. They complain (envy) when Tajiks and Iranians share ethnic, cultural and linguistic ties within the Persianate civilization. - The woman mentions decolonization. She isn't the only Afghaniyat Pashtun that views themselves... as someone who speaks against colonialism, all the while they are blind to the fact that the Afghaniyat they follow is colonial British legacy still causing never ending conflict till this day. The name "Afghanistan" and the Afghan identity would not exist had the British not forced it upon Khorasan. - Pashtun society has a deep and prevalent case of pédóphilia and homosexuality. These two often overlap. Insinuating homosexual innuendos and jokes is very common among Pashtuns, and is often an experience they bond over. - This woman's hatred for Tajiks, Hazaras, and Farsi speakers in general, is on display with the face she makes when saying "Farsizaban". - Mowlana Jalaluddin Balkhi's (Rumi) poetry is filled with themes of love, whether it be for Shams, the divine, God or life. The love his poetry speaks of, and the homosexual lust they laugh about are vastly different. They call him "Afghan" when he would have never heard such a term, nor was any Pashtun or Afghan in Khorasan when he lived in Balkh.show more

Hello, PhD

5,104 subscribers

69,860 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 条评论

Koroush RP 的头像

Koroush RP2 年前

They dont want to be Persian, Tajiks and Hazaras are Persian, speak Persian and thats their cultural and linguistic identity. These pashtuns are so afraid of Persian unity its unreal.

#FreeAfghanistan 的头像

#FreeAfghanistan2 年前

They are eating Bolani and doogh (Shamali famous dishes) and not shaming that they are mocking Persian and Tajiks.

Koroush RP 的头像

Koroush RP2 年前

Why are pashtuns so obsessed with Persians and Iranians? I really wish they could stop speaking our language and trying to always be a part of us and go do their own thing. Their inferiority complex is so bizzare. Literally if an Iranian or a Tajik farts they gossip over it

Nas 的头像

Nas2 年前

They have created a whole show to talk all this nonsense about the Persian speakers? How pathetic.

Sohrab BAKHSHI 的头像

Sohrab BAKHSHI2 年前

Whoever you are👌 keep it up👍 Thank you👊 your sense of humor and how you see the matters are interesting.

Jamal Balkhi 的头像

Jamal Balkhi2 年前

As much as I despise you as you and your racism against Pashtuns, I have to agree that diaspora Afghans are the worst, especially these Cali ones

相关视频

There’s a serious problem of misogyny among parts of the Afghan diaspora—both inside #Afghanistan and abroad. In one recent case, an Afghan-Pashtun restaurant owner in the U.S. verbally abused a Pakistani-American woman and her mother. Sadly, I’ve also been targeted by Afghan/Pashtun individuals who insult the women in my family—my wife, sister, and mother. This shows a deep-rooted culture of disrespect toward women. This isn’t just one case. The #Pashtunwali code, often praised, includes ideas that promote male dominance and misogyny. We need to stop ignoring that. Nearly 90% of Afghan immigrants in the West are Pashtun. Instead of adapting, some bring harmful attitudes and violent behavior—from shootings in Washington to rape cases in the UK. These actions reflect a mindset stuck in a broken, patriarchal past and a specific culture. Reports show that most crimes linked to Afghan nationals in the U.S. are committed by Afghan/Pashtuns—not by Tajiks, Hazaras, or others. That difference matters when we talk about patterns of violence and cultural roots of misogyny.

There’s a serious problem of misogyny among parts of the Afghan diaspora—both inside #Afghanistan and abroad. In one recent case, an Afghan-Pashtun restaurant owner in the U.S. verbally abused a Pakistani-American woman and her mother. Sadly, I’ve also been targeted by Afghan/Pashtun individuals who insult the women in my family—my wife, sister, and mother. This shows a deep-rooted culture of disrespect toward women. This isn’t just one case. The #Pashtunwali code, often praised, includes ideas that promote male dominance and misogyny. We need to stop ignoring that. Nearly 90% of Afghan immigrants in the West are Pashtun. Instead of adapting, some bring harmful attitudes and violent behavior—from shootings in Washington to rape cases in the UK. These actions reflect a mindset stuck in a broken, patriarchal past and a specific culture. Reports show that most crimes linked to Afghan nationals in the U.S. are committed by Afghan/Pashtuns—not by Tajiks, Hazaras, or others. That difference matters when we talk about patterns of violence and cultural roots of misogyny.

Jan Achakzai / جان اچکزئی

14,188 次观看 • 7 个月前

If we interview the people of Pakistan, would everyone speak of "Pakistani" as being a specific ethnic group, and then mention all others as separate? In Afghanistan the 80% non-Afghans don't refer to themselves as "Afghan", and only use that label for Pashtuns. Even after 140 years of brainwashing, nobody wants to be known as Afghan even when they live as hostages inside the country. In Afghanistan the word "Afghan" is viewed as a slur that only the Pashtun minority and house Tajiks, like Saleh, identify with. You can tell the non-Afghan majority live as hostages because when the Taliban propagandist comes around asking if there are ethnic issues, they all say "it's perfect like heaven". The people in Afghanistan suffer as hostages under a low IQ Afghan occupation armed and funded by foreign powers. Luckily the failed buffer state is headed towards collapse.

If we interview the people of Pakistan, would everyone speak of "Pakistani" as being a specific ethnic group, and then mention all others as separate? In Afghanistan the 80% non-Afghans don't refer to themselves as "Afghan", and only use that label for Pashtuns. Even after 140 years of brainwashing, nobody wants to be known as Afghan even when they live as hostages inside the country. In Afghanistan the word "Afghan" is viewed as a slur that only the Pashtun minority and house Tajiks, like Saleh, identify with. You can tell the non-Afghan majority live as hostages because when the Taliban propagandist comes around asking if there are ethnic issues, they all say "it's perfect like heaven". The people in Afghanistan suffer as hostages under a low IQ Afghan occupation armed and funded by foreign powers. Luckily the failed buffer state is headed towards collapse.

Hello, PhD

24,053 次观看 • 8 个月前

Who Are The Tajiks: Past & Present Australian Network Interview of Professor Richard Foltz - Tajiks are Iranians of the East. - 3 Million Tajiks registered officially in Russia. Millions more unregistered. - 16th Century Shia-Sunni schism divided the Iranian world, with Persians in contemporary Iran being Shia, and Persians in Afghanistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan being Sunni. - the Ethnic, Heritage and Cultural ties still bind east and west Iranians. - Nowruz is a worldwide Tajik/Persian cultural festival that's celebrated from Mongolia to Bosnia. - The largest group of Tajiks is in Khorasan (currently Talibanistan/Afghanistan), comprising of 40-50% of the people. - Economic and cultural capitals of Tajik civilization Samarqand, Bukhara and Ferghana were taken from Tajiks by the Bolsheviks and given to Turkic nomads. Similar to how Tajik majority Khorasan was given to Indic nomads by the British. - 30-50% of Uzbekistan is Tajik but the Uzbek government prevents a census to hide figures. (Similar to Afghan governments preventing a census to hide Tajik numbers.) - The most famous poet of the world today is a Tajik/Persian (Rumi). - Tajik/Persian/Iranian heritage goes back to over 3,000 years. - In the 10th century, Tajik Bukhara outpaced Baghdad as the major centre of Islamic learning. - Tajiks/Persians/Iranians were the custodians of Islamic civilization, institutions, culture and education. - Uzbeks were pastoral nomads that were slowly urbanized and Islamized by the Tajiks. - The Bolsheviks were on a mission to sabotage this historic past and displace it all. - The Uzbeks were a cultural and historic blank page that the Bolsheviks could write whatever they wanted on. 'Uzbek' became a national identity due to Soviet social engineering. - Land, heritage and culture belonging to Tajiks, was taken from Tajiks and given to Uzbeks. (Similar to what the British did with handing over Tajik Persianate civilization to nomadic Afghans from the Indian subcontinent).

Who Are The Tajiks: Past & Present Australian Network Interview of Professor Richard Foltz - Tajiks are Iranians of the East. - 3 Million Tajiks registered officially in Russia. Millions more unregistered. - 16th Century Shia-Sunni schism divided the Iranian world, with Persians in contemporary Iran being Shia, and Persians in Afghanistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan being Sunni. - the Ethnic, Heritage and Cultural ties still bind east and west Iranians. - Nowruz is a worldwide Tajik/Persian cultural festival that's celebrated from Mongolia to Bosnia. - The largest group of Tajiks is in Khorasan (currently Talibanistan/Afghanistan), comprising of 40-50% of the people. - Economic and cultural capitals of Tajik civilization Samarqand, Bukhara and Ferghana were taken from Tajiks by the Bolsheviks and given to Turkic nomads. Similar to how Tajik majority Khorasan was given to Indic nomads by the British. - 30-50% of Uzbekistan is Tajik but the Uzbek government prevents a census to hide figures. (Similar to Afghan governments preventing a census to hide Tajik numbers.) - The most famous poet of the world today is a Tajik/Persian (Rumi). - Tajik/Persian/Iranian heritage goes back to over 3,000 years. - In the 10th century, Tajik Bukhara outpaced Baghdad as the major centre of Islamic learning. - Tajiks/Persians/Iranians were the custodians of Islamic civilization, institutions, culture and education. - Uzbeks were pastoral nomads that were slowly urbanized and Islamized by the Tajiks. - The Bolsheviks were on a mission to sabotage this historic past and displace it all. - The Uzbeks were a cultural and historic blank page that the Bolsheviks could write whatever they wanted on. 'Uzbek' became a national identity due to Soviet social engineering. - Land, heritage and culture belonging to Tajiks, was taken from Tajiks and given to Uzbeks. (Similar to what the British did with handing over Tajik Persianate civilization to nomadic Afghans from the Indian subcontinent).

Hello, PhD

20,516 次观看 • 2 年前

I upset the Orthobros on here when I posted that the Wilsons aren’t Christian. They said “how dare you declare whether or not someone is a Christian!” Here is my response (watch til the end for the most ironic part of all of this): Scripture itself tells us that it is OBVIOUS who is saved and that we can discern who is and who is not a child of God. “By this the children of God and the children of the devil are OBVIOUS: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother and sister.” 1 John 3:10 Yes, Christians will still continue to sin, as Romans 7 tell us. Sanctification is certainly messy, there’s no denying that. But someone who has been supernaturally made new by the Holy Spirit will have a real heart change. Regeneration is not an inconsequential experience. It will be obvious to people. The supernatural work of the Holy Spirit is a powerful one. Someone who is made a child of God will bear the family resemblance. No one can be born again and continue to comfortably stay in the mud with the pigs. They might occasionally still fall into the mud, they might still have dirt on their clothes even after they get up, but they will hate it when they do and will live in a humble manner before God crying “have mercy on me, a sinner.” They will pursue righteousness and have a deep deep love for others. And when they are confronted about their sin by others, they repent. So yes, we can look at someone living in a hateful unrighteous arrogant manner for years on end, even after being confronted about it, and determine that they are not of the Lord.

I upset the Orthobros on here when I posted that the Wilsons aren’t Christian. They said “how dare you declare whether or not someone is a Christian!” Here is my response (watch til the end for the most ironic part of all of this): Scripture itself tells us that it is OBVIOUS who is saved and that we can discern who is and who is not a child of God. “By this the children of God and the children of the devil are OBVIOUS: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother and sister.” 1 John 3:10 Yes, Christians will still continue to sin, as Romans 7 tell us. Sanctification is certainly messy, there’s no denying that. But someone who has been supernaturally made new by the Holy Spirit will have a real heart change. Regeneration is not an inconsequential experience. It will be obvious to people. The supernatural work of the Holy Spirit is a powerful one. Someone who is made a child of God will bear the family resemblance. No one can be born again and continue to comfortably stay in the mud with the pigs. They might occasionally still fall into the mud, they might still have dirt on their clothes even after they get up, but they will hate it when they do and will live in a humble manner before God crying “have mercy on me, a sinner.” They will pursue righteousness and have a deep deep love for others. And when they are confronted about their sin by others, they repent. So yes, we can look at someone living in a hateful unrighteous arrogant manner for years on end, even after being confronted about it, and determine that they are not of the Lord.

Lizzie Marbach

45,848 次观看 • 3 个月前

As girls like Hira weep for the education stolen by the Taliban, those living abroad enjoying welfare and freedom in Canada, the US, UK, Australia and Europe call Pakistan’s airstrikes on TTP terrorist safe havens a threat to Afghan sovereignty. What kind of sovereignty is this when Afghan women have no education, no basic rights? These few misguided Pashtun voices sitting abroad call this sovereignty,so why don’t they live this sovereignty with Afghan women in Afghanistan who are battling every day?

As girls like Hira weep for the education stolen by the Taliban, those living abroad enjoying welfare and freedom in Canada, the US, UK, Australia and Europe call Pakistan’s airstrikes on TTP terrorist safe havens a threat to Afghan sovereignty. What kind of sovereignty is this when Afghan women have no education, no basic rights? These few misguided Pashtun voices sitting abroad call this sovereignty,so why don’t they live this sovereignty with Afghan women in Afghanistan who are battling every day?

Najiba Faiz

12,915 次观看 • 5 个月前

"Men do not stay for platitudes. Platitudes do not carry a soul through the winter. When the child is in the ground, when the marriage is in ruins, when the diagnosis comes back and the floor drops out of the world, no one was ever held up by 'be kind and stay positive.' They are held, if they are held at all, by something with iron in it. By a witness that the heavens are real and open, that God still speaks, that the dead are not lost, that there is power on the earth greater than the darkness. The early Saints had that, and they knew they had it, because they had felt it in their own bodies. They were healed under hands. They spoke in tongues. They saw visions and buried their children in the certainty of resurrection and crossed a continent on the strength of a fire they could not have faked. That is what converts a man and that is what keeps him, not a well managed self-help program, but the living evidence that what we preach is true. So the cure is not complicated, and it is not new. It is to be again the Church of our fathers. Stop apologizing. Stop trimming the glorious truth into something the world will pat on the head. Speak with authority and with the hammer, the way Joseph spoke, the way Brigham spoke, the way men speak when they actually believe the heavens have opened over them. Reach again for the gifts of the Spirit, and stop pretending they were a founding era curiosity, because a testimony built on argument crumbles in the first storm and a testimony built on the manifest power of God does not. And above all, live as though the heavens are open, because they are, and they have only ever felt closed to a people who stopped expecting them to answer. The Saints are not leaving because the gospel is too much. They are leaving because we have made it too little. Make it glorious and demanding again, and watch who comes back through the door. The hungry have not gone anywhere. We simply stopped setting the table."

"Men do not stay for platitudes. Platitudes do not carry a soul through the winter. When the child is in the ground, when the marriage is in ruins, when the diagnosis comes back and the floor drops out of the world, no one was ever held up by 'be kind and stay positive.' They are held, if they are held at all, by something with iron in it. By a witness that the heavens are real and open, that God still speaks, that the dead are not lost, that there is power on the earth greater than the darkness. The early Saints had that, and they knew they had it, because they had felt it in their own bodies. They were healed under hands. They spoke in tongues. They saw visions and buried their children in the certainty of resurrection and crossed a continent on the strength of a fire they could not have faked. That is what converts a man and that is what keeps him, not a well managed self-help program, but the living evidence that what we preach is true. So the cure is not complicated, and it is not new. It is to be again the Church of our fathers. Stop apologizing. Stop trimming the glorious truth into something the world will pat on the head. Speak with authority and with the hammer, the way Joseph spoke, the way Brigham spoke, the way men speak when they actually believe the heavens have opened over them. Reach again for the gifts of the Spirit, and stop pretending they were a founding era curiosity, because a testimony built on argument crumbles in the first storm and a testimony built on the manifest power of God does not. And above all, live as though the heavens are open, because they are, and they have only ever felt closed to a people who stopped expecting them to answer. The Saints are not leaving because the gospel is too much. They are leaving because we have made it too little. Make it glorious and demanding again, and watch who comes back through the door. The hungry have not gone anywhere. We simply stopped setting the table."

Kirk Rollins

63,131 次观看 • 2 个月前

Bill Cooper said in 1992 that Armageddon would be initiated in the Middle East and that they would detonate a nuclear weapon. Today, Trump and his generals have told their army that this is Armageddon and that they will usher in the return of the Messiah with an attack on Iran. The Rebbe also told Netanyahu that he would be the one to greet the Messiah and that he needed to do something to usher in the return. Khamenei and Iran also believe they are in the final war and that the Mahdi will appear. Bill Cooper was right. It is not the Jews, the Christians, or the Muslims; it is the secret societies that run the world, and they are certain that we are in the time of Armageddon. The plan for the COVID pandemic and the war in the Middle East was crafted in the British Masonic lodges in 2005.

Bill Cooper said in 1992 that Armageddon would be initiated in the Middle East and that they would detonate a nuclear weapon. Today, Trump and his generals have told their army that this is Armageddon and that they will usher in the return of the Messiah with an attack on Iran. The Rebbe also told Netanyahu that he would be the one to greet the Messiah and that he needed to do something to usher in the return. Khamenei and Iran also believe they are in the final war and that the Mahdi will appear. Bill Cooper was right. It is not the Jews, the Christians, or the Muslims; it is the secret societies that run the world, and they are certain that we are in the time of Armageddon. The plan for the COVID pandemic and the war in the Middle East was crafted in the British Masonic lodges in 2005.

Open Minded Approach

148,450 次观看 • 4 个月前

“Terrorists, even when they are five, actually do harm, and people take that seriously. So FDLR, why no one would take them seriously, knowing their history, and knowing they are associated with a government in DRC. You have heard of hate speech and all kinds of things. Still, the issue becomes how many would they be? It is falsifying the issue of numbers; they are many, that’s a fact. But the essence of saying how many is like saying you are exaggerating. I have been asked by some leaders of Europe, how many are they likely to be? When somebody asks me that, I know he is interested in covering up the problem. When you talk about FDLR, the resolutions and statements at the UN are like a whisper. It is like Rwanda should not be taking action against them, as if they are not connected with the whole history or their responsibility in what they did here.” President Kagame

“Terrorists, even when they are five, actually do harm, and people take that seriously. So FDLR, why no one would take them seriously, knowing their history, and knowing they are associated with a government in DRC. You have heard of hate speech and all kinds of things. Still, the issue becomes how many would they be? It is falsifying the issue of numbers; they are many, that’s a fact. But the essence of saying how many is like saying you are exaggerating. I have been asked by some leaders of Europe, how many are they likely to be? When somebody asks me that, I know he is interested in covering up the problem. When you talk about FDLR, the resolutions and statements at the UN are like a whisper. It is like Rwanda should not be taking action against them, as if they are not connected with the whole history or their responsibility in what they did here.” President Kagame

Presidency | Rwanda

42,327 次观看 • 8 个月前

Michel Gondry talks about this magnificent scene from "Kes" (1969, Loach): "With Ken Loach, it's always very social. So, its the middle of England. In the '70s, probably still now, but it was very ravaged by unemployment and poverty. And you see kids when they are 15, they've already registered for unemployment money. So this kid, he finds his passion with his bird, the kestrel. And there is this moment that's magical, and it's a great lesson too. So, at school, he's very invisible. He's completely invisible. And one day, each pupil has to talk about something. And he starts to talk about his bird and suddenly, he shines. He changes because he speaks about something that he loves. This thing is amazing to me. That it's a great illustration about how so many people feel they are lazy, or they are not interested in things. If they find what they love, they would be a different person." (Four Favourites with Michel Gondry, Letterboxd, 2025)

Michel Gondry talks about this magnificent scene from "Kes" (1969, Loach): "With Ken Loach, it's always very social. So, its the middle of England. In the '70s, probably still now, but it was very ravaged by unemployment and poverty. And you see kids when they are 15, they've already registered for unemployment money. So this kid, he finds his passion with his bird, the kestrel. And there is this moment that's magical, and it's a great lesson too. So, at school, he's very invisible. He's completely invisible. And one day, each pupil has to talk about something. And he starts to talk about his bird and suddenly, he shines. He changes because he speaks about something that he loves. This thing is amazing to me. That it's a great illustration about how so many people feel they are lazy, or they are not interested in things. If they find what they love, they would be a different person." (Four Favourites with Michel Gondry, Letterboxd, 2025)

DepressedBergman

67,682 次观看 • 1 年前

Imagine that these deviant, who have reached the level of competing with Abu Jahl and Abu Lahab, if they haven't already exceeded them in their Shirk, are counted as callers to Islaam!? One is a world renowned feminine habitual liar and another is burnt out Jahmi who pretends to have manners with the creation while he is the most ill mannered with Allaah, the Exalted. Whether he is denying Allaah's attributes or, as in this clip, alleging that other entities rivaling Allaah in creating and managing the universe isn't necessarily Shirk, this disgraceful clown has the nerve to call for unity with the enemies of the Sahaabah. These unprincipled stooges who either never got proper Ta'seel upon the way of the Salaf or they drank from the fountain of Jahm Bin Safwaan, will never prosper in either worlds and they will have to face Allaah with all these crimes they have committed against the Deen of Allaah while they do it in the name of the Deen. May Allaah guide you both and guide your lost followers.

Imagine that these deviant, who have reached the level of competing with Abu Jahl and Abu Lahab, if they haven't already exceeded them in their Shirk, are counted as callers to Islaam!? One is a world renowned feminine habitual liar and another is burnt out Jahmi who pretends to have manners with the creation while he is the most ill mannered with Allaah, the Exalted. Whether he is denying Allaah's attributes or, as in this clip, alleging that other entities rivaling Allaah in creating and managing the universe isn't necessarily Shirk, this disgraceful clown has the nerve to call for unity with the enemies of the Sahaabah. These unprincipled stooges who either never got proper Ta'seel upon the way of the Salaf or they drank from the fountain of Jahm Bin Safwaan, will never prosper in either worlds and they will have to face Allaah with all these crimes they have committed against the Deen of Allaah while they do it in the name of the Deen. May Allaah guide you both and guide your lost followers.

Abu Mussab Wajdi Akkari

14,570 次观看 • 4 个月前

The BBC and the British press will never get over the fact that all their attempts to diminish and break this woman, from the time she was simply a 23 year old courting the Future King of the UK, to now as the Future Queen Consort of the UK, all failed. Out of ALL the Royal Women in the World and in the BRF, Catherine is ONLY one they single out to call her by a nickname and her maiden name🤡 "Kate Middleton" is NOT even her name; It was NEVER her name. She was born and raised "Catherine Elizabeth Middleton". She always introduces herself as "Catherine". "Kate" is a childhood nickname used by her family and friends. Are you her family? are your her friend?🤡 So the BBC saying "Kate", who is "Kate"?🤡 The level of disrespect and familiarity is off the chart and that is why you do not allow this familiarity with people from the get-go. How hard is it to call someone by their given name? Why is she the only one singled out ? Because, my dears, They cannot get over the fact that Catherine has never and will never lower herself to play their media games and give her any access to herself or her family🔥 Catherine, just like William, are organically popular, they have never needed the press to hype them up or do PR for them. The press has zero control over them and that is what they are punishing Catherine for. And you wonder why Prince William treats the British press like with the "detached contempt" he does ?🤡 They can try but they cannot diminish Catherine. In Life, there are women who need crowns and titles to feel like Royalty. But Catherine is of the breed of women who naturally exude all the attribute of a Queen. Just look at her and you see Royalty personified. No one, not even blood royals, have her natural grace, elegance, poise and pull with the British Public. No one. You cannot teach her level of grace, you are born with it or not😌 Catherine never made a fuss about Titles because she is a woman who knows who she is and where she is going in Life and that is why she will keep shining for being herself, and the BBC will keep covering her so they can feed their children and pay their bills☕️ #CatherineTheGreat #PrincessofWales 📹 Kensington Palace

The BBC and the British press will never get over the fact that all their attempts to diminish and break this woman, from the time she was simply a 23 year old courting the Future King of the UK, to now as the Future Queen Consort of the UK, all failed. Out of ALL the Royal Women in the World and in the BRF, Catherine is ONLY one they single out to call her by a nickname and her maiden name🤡 "Kate Middleton" is NOT even her name; It was NEVER her name. She was born and raised "Catherine Elizabeth Middleton". She always introduces herself as "Catherine". "Kate" is a childhood nickname used by her family and friends. Are you her family? are your her friend?🤡 So the BBC saying "Kate", who is "Kate"?🤡 The level of disrespect and familiarity is off the chart and that is why you do not allow this familiarity with people from the get-go. How hard is it to call someone by their given name? Why is she the only one singled out ? Because, my dears, They cannot get over the fact that Catherine has never and will never lower herself to play their media games and give her any access to herself or her family🔥 Catherine, just like William, are organically popular, they have never needed the press to hype them up or do PR for them. The press has zero control over them and that is what they are punishing Catherine for. And you wonder why Prince William treats the British press like with the "detached contempt" he does ?🤡 They can try but they cannot diminish Catherine. In Life, there are women who need crowns and titles to feel like Royalty. But Catherine is of the breed of women who naturally exude all the attribute of a Queen. Just look at her and you see Royalty personified. No one, not even blood royals, have her natural grace, elegance, poise and pull with the British Public. No one. You cannot teach her level of grace, you are born with it or not😌 Catherine never made a fuss about Titles because she is a woman who knows who she is and where she is going in Life and that is why she will keep shining for being herself, and the BBC will keep covering her so they can feed their children and pay their bills☕️ #CatherineTheGreat #PrincessofWales 📹 Kensington Palace

Canellecitadelle

226,964 次观看 • 9 个月前

Secretary Hegseth and Secretary Rubio just set the record straight on U.S. vessel seizures in front of the ENTIRE MSM — and they weren’t having any of the spin. Hegseth stared DIRECTLY into their cameras and laid down the facts: HEGSETH: “Two oil tankers, TWO, overnight were seized by the United States of America.” “Stateless or sanctioned because the oil blockade, the quarantine of oil under stateless vessels continues.” “That leverage will continue as Secretary Rubio outlined. Our military is prepared to continue this.” “As he said, the president when he speaks, he means it.” “He is not messing around. We’re an administration of action to advance our interests, and that is on full display.” Then Rubio jumped in with more context about what the seizures reveal about Venezuela’s incentives: RUBIO: “One of those ships that was seized, that had oil in the Caribbean, you know what the interim authorities are asking for in Venezuela?” “They want that oil that was seized to be part of this deal. They understand…they understand that the only way they can move oil and generate revenue, and not have economic collapse is if they cooperate and they work with the United States.”

Secretary Hegseth and Secretary Rubio just set the record straight on U.S. vessel seizures in front of the ENTIRE MSM — and they weren’t having any of the spin. Hegseth stared DIRECTLY into their cameras and laid down the facts: HEGSETH: “Two oil tankers, TWO, overnight were seized by the United States of America.” “Stateless or sanctioned because the oil blockade, the quarantine of oil under stateless vessels continues.” “That leverage will continue as Secretary Rubio outlined. Our military is prepared to continue this.” “As he said, the president when he speaks, he means it.” “He is not messing around. We’re an administration of action to advance our interests, and that is on full display.” Then Rubio jumped in with more context about what the seizures reveal about Venezuela’s incentives: RUBIO: “One of those ships that was seized, that had oil in the Caribbean, you know what the interim authorities are asking for in Venezuela?” “They want that oil that was seized to be part of this deal. They understand…they understand that the only way they can move oil and generate revenue, and not have economic collapse is if they cooperate and they work with the United States.”

Overton

421,031 次观看 • 7 个月前

But now today, we have to agree, we have to accept, that the last shower of military reign is coming from Afghanistan, and from Khorasan. Whether the Afghan people are able to maintain unity in their ranks or not, because Shaytan is always at work, to try to bring rivalry, different warlords and disunity and fighting and civil war. We don’t know what will happen in the future. But so far the evidence is, that they had given a spectacular demonstration, that they are, the last shower of military reign in this Ummah.

But now today, we have to agree, we have to accept, that the last shower of military reign is coming from Afghanistan, and from Khorasan. Whether the Afghan people are able to maintain unity in their ranks or not, because Shaytan is always at work, to try to bring rivalry, different warlords and disunity and fighting and civil war. We don’t know what will happen in the future. But so far the evidence is, that they had given a spectacular demonstration, that they are, the last shower of military reign in this Ummah.

The Sure Path

10,514 次观看 • 6 个月前

When someone asks why people love #NPP, how different they are from the rest, why traditional politics will never come back to life.. show this. It is about the strength of the selfless organization and not only about who is in the government

When someone asks why people love #NPP, how different they are from the rest, why traditional politics will never come back to life.. show this. It is about the strength of the selfless organization and not only about who is in the government

Chathuranga Abey

14,812 次观看 • 1 年前

"A priest’s testimony: "If Islam is violent as they claim, no Christian or Jew would have survived the early muslim conquest!" In this touching and peaceful message, Father Elias Zahlawi, a Christian priest from Damascus, Syria, speaks from the heart about the true face of Islam. He reminds the world that what many in the West call “Muslim terrorism” has nothing to do with Islam — a faith that has always promoted coexistence, compassion, and respect for all humanity. Born and raised among both Christians and Muslims, Father Elias shares his personal experience of friendship, harmony, and brotherhood in the land where these faiths have lived side by side for centuries. This short speech is not just a statement — it’s a testimony of truth and peace from a man who has lived it. Quran 60:8. As for those who have not fought against you for your religion, nor expelled you from your homes, God does not prohibit you from dealing with them kindly and equitably. God loves the equitable. Quran 5:82-83 82. You will find that the people most hostile towards the believers are the Jews and the polytheists. And you will find that the nearest in affection towards the believers are those who say, “We are Christians.” That is because among them are priests and monks, and they are not arrogant. 83. And when they hear what was revealed to the Messenger, you see their eyes overflowing with tears, as they recognize the truth in it. They say, “Our Lord, we have believed, so count us among the witnesses.”"

"A priest’s testimony: "If Islam is violent as they claim, no Christian or Jew would have survived the early muslim conquest!" In this touching and peaceful message, Father Elias Zahlawi, a Christian priest from Damascus, Syria, speaks from the heart about the true face of Islam. He reminds the world that what many in the West call “Muslim terrorism” has nothing to do with Islam — a faith that has always promoted coexistence, compassion, and respect for all humanity. Born and raised among both Christians and Muslims, Father Elias shares his personal experience of friendship, harmony, and brotherhood in the land where these faiths have lived side by side for centuries. This short speech is not just a statement — it’s a testimony of truth and peace from a man who has lived it. Quran 60:8. As for those who have not fought against you for your religion, nor expelled you from your homes, God does not prohibit you from dealing with them kindly and equitably. God loves the equitable. Quran 5:82-83 82. You will find that the people most hostile towards the believers are the Jews and the polytheists. And you will find that the nearest in affection towards the believers are those who say, “We are Christians.” That is because among them are priests and monks, and they are not arrogant. 83. And when they hear what was revealed to the Messenger, you see their eyes overflowing with tears, as they recognize the truth in it. They say, “Our Lord, we have believed, so count us among the witnesses.”"

Idris

49,198 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just *Pow* in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? *Like, I mean, pow,* He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just Pow in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? Like, I mean, pow, He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

Terri Green

132,141 次观看 • 4 个月前

Just been tagged in this. I have no doubt in my mind that during WW2 these people would have collaborated with Germany for the following reason…. 1. They are morally bankrupt traitors who have proven they will side with the invaders during an invasion. 2. They hate Jews The thing I find most ironic is the fact that they instantly call anyone a Nazi who disagrees with their warped view of the world. The only thing that’s stopping them from being a Nazi is the fact that it’s not the Nazi’s invading because if they were she would be holding a big red flag with a swastika on it. This is a result of watching BBC news and being brainwashed by Iranian and Russian bot accounts online. We will never have a peaceful country while these people are bringing foreign wars to our streets. The most insane thing about all of this is these are the very same people who have a meltdown if they see people flagging a British flag in our own country. They are the enemy of Britain 🇬🇧

Just been tagged in this. I have no doubt in my mind that during WW2 these people would have collaborated with Germany for the following reason…. 1. They are morally bankrupt traitors who have proven they will side with the invaders during an invasion. 2. They hate Jews The thing I find most ironic is the fact that they instantly call anyone a Nazi who disagrees with their warped view of the world. The only thing that’s stopping them from being a Nazi is the fact that it’s not the Nazi’s invading because if they were she would be holding a big red flag with a swastika on it. This is a result of watching BBC news and being brainwashed by Iranian and Russian bot accounts online. We will never have a peaceful country while these people are bringing foreign wars to our streets. The most insane thing about all of this is these are the very same people who have a meltdown if they see people flagging a British flag in our own country. They are the enemy of Britain 🇬🇧

Around Liverpool

68,739 次观看 • 1 个月前