Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

After posing a hypothetical 'gotcha' scenario, Elissa Slotkin grows visibly flustered and whiny when Pete Hegseth refuses to take the bait: Slotkin: "It's not hypothetical! Tell the American people: Will you deploy the uniformed military to our polls to collect voter rolls or machines?" Hegseth: "You're performing for cable...

Jules31415's profile picture

Julia 🇺🇸

190,619 subscribers

305,178 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 JUST IN: SecWar Pete Hegseth is TOYING with insufferable Dem Sen. Elissa Slotkin after she fearmongers that he'd send TROOPS to the polls HEGSETH: "Yet another GOTCHA hypothetical, which is your specialty!" SLOTKIN: "It's not!!" HEGSETH: "You're PERFORMING for cable news right now." SLOTKIN: "DUDE, just answer the question!" HEGSETH: "It's a hypothetical." 😂🔥
1:59

🚨 JUST IN: SecWar Pete Hegseth is TOYING with insufferable Dem Sen. Elissa Slotkin after she fearmongers that he'd send TROOPS to the polls HEGSETH: "Yet another GOTCHA hypothetical, which is your specialty!" SLOTKIN: "It's not!!" HEGSETH: "You're PERFORMING for cable news right now." SLOTKIN: "DUDE, just answer the question!" HEGSETH: "It's a hypothetical." 😂🔥

Eric Daugherty

440,332 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

SLOTKIN: If the president asks you to seize ballots or voting machines in states during the 2026 election, will you stand up for the Constitution and say 'no,' or will you salute and do his bidding? HEGSETH: It's yet another gotcha hypothetical, which is your speciality SLOTKIN: It's not a hypothetical. The guy you're performing for right now says he wishes he signed that executive order in 2020 for your predecessor! HEGSETH: You're performing for cable news right now. By the way, in 2024, 15 states did deploy troops to polling stations SLOTKIN: Under their governor's authority!
2:07

SLOTKIN: If the president asks you to seize ballots or voting machines in states during the 2026 election, will you stand up for the Constitution and say 'no,' or will you salute and do his bidding? HEGSETH: It's yet another gotcha hypothetical, which is your speciality SLOTKIN: It's not a hypothetical. The guy you're performing for right now says he wishes he signed that executive order in 2020 for your predecessor! HEGSETH: You're performing for cable news right now. By the way, in 2024, 15 states did deploy troops to polling stations SLOTKIN: Under their governor's authority!

Aaron Rupar

325,941 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing just delivered this exchange: Sen. Sen. Elissa Slotkin pressed SecDef Pete Hegseth: “If the President asks you to deploy the uniform military to our polls to collect voter rolls or machines in 2026… will you stand up for the Constitution and say no, or will you salute and do his bidding?” Hegseth called it a “gotcha hypothetical.” Slotkin fired back: “Dude, just answer the question. It’s not hypothetical. It’s never been done in our history.” The same hearing also covered the war in Iran and Pentagon priorities.
5:28

🚨 Senate Armed Services Committee hearing just delivered this exchange: Sen. Sen. Elissa Slotkin pressed SecDef Pete Hegseth: “If the President asks you to deploy the uniform military to our polls to collect voter rolls or machines in 2026… will you stand up for the Constitution and say no, or will you salute and do his bidding?” Hegseth called it a “gotcha hypothetical.” Slotkin fired back: “Dude, just answer the question. It’s not hypothetical. It’s never been done in our history.” The same hearing also covered the war in Iran and Pentagon priorities.

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

15,906 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: Hegseth refuses to answer if he'd seize ballots in the midterm election. SLOTKIN: If the president asks, will you stand up for the Constitution and say no? HEGSETH: It's another 'gotcha' hypothetical, which is your specialty. SLOTKIN: You and I have done this dance before. It's not hypothetical. You give that answer all the time; get over it, okay? Your boss you're performing for right now told journalists that he wished he signed that executive order for your predecessor in 2020. What are you going to do? Tell the American people... HEGSETH: Are you accusing me of performing? because you're performing for cable news right now. SLOTKIN: Dude, dude, just answer the question. HEGSETH: It's a hypothetical, umm, Joe Biden, umm...
2:17

🚨BREAKING: Hegseth refuses to answer if he'd seize ballots in the midterm election. SLOTKIN: If the president asks, will you stand up for the Constitution and say no? HEGSETH: It's another 'gotcha' hypothetical, which is your specialty. SLOTKIN: You and I have done this dance before. It's not hypothetical. You give that answer all the time; get over it, okay? Your boss you're performing for right now told journalists that he wished he signed that executive order for your predecessor in 2020. What are you going to do? Tell the American people... HEGSETH: Are you accusing me of performing? because you're performing for cable news right now. SLOTKIN: Dude, dude, just answer the question. HEGSETH: It's a hypothetical, umm, Joe Biden, umm...

WWG1WGA🇺🇸♥️

206,311 просмотров • 29 дней назад

🚨BREAKING: Hegseth refuses to answer if he'd seize ballots in the midterm election. SLOTKIN: If the president asks, will you stand up for the Constitution and say no? HEGSETH: It's another 'gotcha' hypothetical, which is your specialty. SLOTKIN: You and I have done this dance before. It's not hypothetical. You give that answer all the time; get over it, okay? Your boss you're performing for right now told journalists that he wished he signed that executive order for your predecessor in 2020. What are you going to do? Tell the American people... HEGSETH: Are you accusing me of performing? because you're performing for cable news right now. SLOTKIN: Dude, dude, just answer the question. HEGSETH: It's a hypothetical, umm, Joe Biden, umm...
2:17

🚨BREAKING: Hegseth refuses to answer if he'd seize ballots in the midterm election. SLOTKIN: If the president asks, will you stand up for the Constitution and say no? HEGSETH: It's another 'gotcha' hypothetical, which is your specialty. SLOTKIN: You and I have done this dance before. It's not hypothetical. You give that answer all the time; get over it, okay? Your boss you're performing for right now told journalists that he wished he signed that executive order for your predecessor in 2020. What are you going to do? Tell the American people... HEGSETH: Are you accusing me of performing? because you're performing for cable news right now. SLOTKIN: Dude, dude, just answer the question. HEGSETH: It's a hypothetical, umm, Joe Biden, umm...

CALL TO ACTIVISM

1,319,379 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WOW! Sen. Elissa Slotkin just completely eviscerated Pete Hegseth for refusing to say he will not send the U.S. military to polling places to collect ballots or voting machines. This exchange is telling... Senator Slotkin: “If President Trump asks you to seize ballots or voting machines in states during the 2026 election, will you stand up for the Constitution and say ‘no,’ or will you salute and do his bidding.” Hegseth: “I didn’t get a chance to address your front part of your question.” Slotkin: “Just address the election issues. Please.” Hegseth: “It’s just another gotcha hypothetical.” Slotkin: “It’s not a hypothetical. You give that answer all the time. You and I have done this dance before. Get over it, OK? What are you going to do? You are the guy in the seat. Tell the American people.” Hegseth: “Are you accusing me of performing, because you are performing for cable news.”
1:53

WOW! Sen. Elissa Slotkin just completely eviscerated Pete Hegseth for refusing to say he will not send the U.S. military to polling places to collect ballots or voting machines. This exchange is telling... Senator Slotkin: “If President Trump asks you to seize ballots or voting machines in states during the 2026 election, will you stand up for the Constitution and say ‘no,’ or will you salute and do his bidding.” Hegseth: “I didn’t get a chance to address your front part of your question.” Slotkin: “Just address the election issues. Please.” Hegseth: “It’s just another gotcha hypothetical.” Slotkin: “It’s not a hypothetical. You give that answer all the time. You and I have done this dance before. Get over it, OK? What are you going to do? You are the guy in the seat. Tell the American people.” Hegseth: “Are you accusing me of performing, because you are performing for cable news.”

Ed Krassenstein

62,124 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I asked Secretary Hegseth if he would deploy the uniform military to our polls to collect voter rolls or machines. It wasn’t a hypothetical question, it was based on an executive order President Trump drafted but didn’t sign in 2020. He refused to answer.
0:36

I asked Secretary Hegseth if he would deploy the uniform military to our polls to collect voter rolls or machines. It wasn’t a hypothetical question, it was based on an executive order President Trump drafted but didn’t sign in 2020. He refused to answer.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin

27,889 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.Sen. Elissa Slotkin: "If the President…asks you to seize ballots or voting machines in states during the 2026 election, will you stand up for the Constitution and say no?" Secretary Hegseth: "It's yet another 'gotcha' hypothetical, which is your specialty."
3:04

.Sen. Elissa Slotkin: "If the President…asks you to seize ballots or voting machines in states during the 2026 election, will you stand up for the Constitution and say no?" Secretary Hegseth: "It's yet another 'gotcha' hypothetical, which is your specialty."

CSPAN

38,879 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Slotkin: “Have you given the order to be able to shoot at unarmed protesters in any way? I’m just asking the question. Don’t laugh.” Hegseth: “What is that based on? What evidence would you have that an order like that has ever been given?” Slotkin: “It is based on Donald Trump giving that order to your predecessor, to a Republican Secretary of Defense, who I give a lot of credit to because he didn’t accept the order. He had more guts and balls than you because he said, ‘I’m not going to send in the uniformed military to do something that I know in my gut isn’t right’…I want the answer to be no. Please tell me it’s no. Have you given the order?” Hegseth: “Senator, I’d be careful what you read in books and believing it, except for the Bible.”
1:13

Slotkin: “Have you given the order to be able to shoot at unarmed protesters in any way? I’m just asking the question. Don’t laugh.” Hegseth: “What is that based on? What evidence would you have that an order like that has ever been given?” Slotkin: “It is based on Donald Trump giving that order to your predecessor, to a Republican Secretary of Defense, who I give a lot of credit to because he didn’t accept the order. He had more guts and balls than you because he said, ‘I’m not going to send in the uniformed military to do something that I know in my gut isn’t right’…I want the answer to be no. Please tell me it’s no. Have you given the order?” Hegseth: “Senator, I’d be careful what you read in books and believing it, except for the Bible.”

Republican Accountability

55,757 просмотров • 1 год назад

It was a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing this past June. Senator Elissa Slotkin pressed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on whether he authorized troops sent to Los Angeles to detain or arrest protesters during immigration enforcement actions. She got frustrated with his answers and said, “Be a man, list it out. Did you authorize them to detain or arrest?” Elise Slotkin is a typical liberal lunatic and hated among Michiganders. Her bragging of a CIA background only enhances her image of a participant in corrupt government politics. Hegseth said the troops were there to protect ICE officers doing deportations of people who came in under the previous administration, not to arrest U.S. citizens. The exchange got pretty heated.
3:02

It was a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing this past June. Senator Elissa Slotkin pressed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on whether he authorized troops sent to Los Angeles to detain or arrest protesters during immigration enforcement actions. She got frustrated with his answers and said, “Be a man, list it out. Did you authorize them to detain or arrest?” Elise Slotkin is a typical liberal lunatic and hated among Michiganders. Her bragging of a CIA background only enhances her image of a participant in corrupt government politics. Hegseth said the troops were there to protect ICE officers doing deportations of people who came in under the previous administration, not to arrest U.S. citizens. The exchange got pretty heated.

Patricia 🇺🇸

226,193 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Pete Hegseth calmly dismantles Ro Khanna's hysteria, reminding him who actually wrecked the economy: Ro Khanna: "Do you know how much it will cost Americans in terms of their increased costs in gas and food because of the Iran war?" Pete Hegseth: "I would simply ask you what the cost is of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Playing gotcha questions-" Khanna: "You're saying it's a gotcha question to ask?!...I give you that, sir." Hegseth: "What would pay to ensure Iran doesn't have a nuclear bomb?" Khanna: "I reclaim my time...Would you acknowledge the economic cost?" Hegseth: "We have an incredible economic team that's managing this better...I mean, what the previous administration did to our economy, what the previous administration did for the inflation, what the previous administration did with Covid, and you're going to lecture this administraiton about the economy? INCREDIBLE." Khanna: "But! But! YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW!!!"
1:56

Pete Hegseth calmly dismantles Ro Khanna's hysteria, reminding him who actually wrecked the economy: Ro Khanna: "Do you know how much it will cost Americans in terms of their increased costs in gas and food because of the Iran war?" Pete Hegseth: "I would simply ask you what the cost is of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Playing gotcha questions-" Khanna: "You're saying it's a gotcha question to ask?!...I give you that, sir." Hegseth: "What would pay to ensure Iran doesn't have a nuclear bomb?" Khanna: "I reclaim my time...Would you acknowledge the economic cost?" Hegseth: "We have an incredible economic team that's managing this better...I mean, what the previous administration did to our economy, what the previous administration did for the inflation, what the previous administration did with Covid, and you're going to lecture this administraiton about the economy? INCREDIBLE." Khanna: "But! But! YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW!!!"

Julia 🇺🇸

151,215 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Coons: Our president said that we never asked for and never received anything from our NATO allies. Was that your experience in Afghanistan? Hegseth: I've written extensively about that, and the vast majority of my experience was frustration with the limits of what those troops were able to do because of the political caveats, rules of engagement limits that came from there. Coons: But you don't doubt or question that about a third of all the combat casualties in our war in Afghanistan were our NATO partners and allies? Hegseth: I would have to go back and check that number
1:32

Coons: Our president said that we never asked for and never received anything from our NATO allies. Was that your experience in Afghanistan? Hegseth: I've written extensively about that, and the vast majority of my experience was frustration with the limits of what those troops were able to do because of the political caveats, rules of engagement limits that came from there. Coons: But you don't doubt or question that about a third of all the combat casualties in our war in Afghanistan were our NATO partners and allies? Hegseth: I would have to go back and check that number

Acyn

554,538 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Senator Senator Mark Kelly asks Pete Hegseth if he stands by his statement that he would provide no quarter and no mercy to the enemy. Hegseth refuses to answer a simple “yes” or “no” question. Senator Kelly: “I’m going to give you one more chance to address a question here… Your quote was ‘we will keep on pushing, keep advancing, no quarter, no mercy for our enemies,’ and yesterday you did not clarify if you stand by this statement.” Hegseth: [non-answer] Senator Kelly: “You are the Secretary of Defense. The things you say matter and your response here, right now, makes it clear to the American people exactly why you are not right for this job.”
1:38

Senator Senator Mark Kelly asks Pete Hegseth if he stands by his statement that he would provide no quarter and no mercy to the enemy. Hegseth refuses to answer a simple “yes” or “no” question. Senator Kelly: “I’m going to give you one more chance to address a question here… Your quote was ‘we will keep on pushing, keep advancing, no quarter, no mercy for our enemies,’ and yesterday you did not clarify if you stand by this statement.” Hegseth: [non-answer] Senator Kelly: “You are the Secretary of Defense. The things you say matter and your response here, right now, makes it clear to the American people exactly why you are not right for this job.”

Ed Krassenstein

767,252 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Kelly: Now Pete Hegseth wants even our longest serving military veterans to live with the constant threat that they could be deprived of their rank and retirement pay years, or even decades, after they leave the military, just because he or another secretary of defense or a president doesn't like what they've said. If Pete Hegseth succeeds in silencing me, then he and every other secretary of defense who comes after him will have license to punish any retired veteran of any political persuasion for the things that they say. And by that logic, a 100-year-old World War II veterans could be hauled in and censured or court-martialed because he says something that Pete Hegseth disagrees with. That's wrong. It's not the way things work in the United States of America, and I will not stand for it, because our freedom of speech, the separation of powers, and due process are not just words on a page. They are core principles of our democracy
3:08

Kelly: Now Pete Hegseth wants even our longest serving military veterans to live with the constant threat that they could be deprived of their rank and retirement pay years, or even decades, after they leave the military, just because he or another secretary of defense or a president doesn't like what they've said. If Pete Hegseth succeeds in silencing me, then he and every other secretary of defense who comes after him will have license to punish any retired veteran of any political persuasion for the things that they say. And by that logic, a 100-year-old World War II veterans could be hauled in and censured or court-martialed because he says something that Pete Hegseth disagrees with. That's wrong. It's not the way things work in the United States of America, and I will not stand for it, because our freedom of speech, the separation of powers, and due process are not just words on a page. They are core principles of our democracy

Acyn

310,373 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад