Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

After reviewing thoroughly NK Digital slightly updated their exit poll report. They have published expected results for every seat. TMC : 222- 230 BJP: 52 - 58 (Note: Since 2021 NK Digital & Bong news Live have both been highly accurate with Bengal nos)

50,433 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Former Assistant Secretary of HUD Catherine Austin Fitts: "throughout our lives... we've been seeing the train tracks of digital control built [up] around us" "The bankers have... put Trump in... to get the final pieces of the control grid... particularly the data centers" "The conservatives are going to use election fraud and immigration and child online safety and these other ruses basically to force everybody into the digital ID they tried to get with vaccine certificates and didn't get to it" "[And right now] the bankers run monetary policy, and the people's representatives run fiscal policy. And that's what the revolution was all about. It was taxation with or without representation" "Where they want to go is the bankers now want to control fiscal policy. With digital money they have the technology now to institute control of both monetary and fiscal policy. And that is where they are going" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts), is taken from a Liberty Forum of Silicon Valley (The Liberty Forum Of Silicon Valley) presentation posted to Rumble on May 16, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Another thing we didn't notice is throughout our lives, we've been seeing the train tracks of digital control built around us. So we've seen digital assets, digital transport, smart homes, driverless cars, QR codes, bar cards, barcodes, digital elections, AI, digital IDs, smartphones. "Each piece of this seems really convenient. The problem is, when you synthesize it together, it's like putting up three sides of a corral around a herd. When the fourth corral or the fourth fence clicks in, suddenly we're in a whole new world. I want to talk about what that fourth line looks for. "The first thing I do want to say in the summer of 2024, I have a show every week on the Solari Report called Money and Markets. And I said to John Titus on Money and Markets, mark my words, the bankers— This was June 2024. The bankers have decided to put Trump in and use him to get the final pieces of the control grid. "The conservatives are going to use election fraud and immigration and child online safety and these other ruses basically to force everybody into the digital ID they tried to get with vaccine certificates and didn't get to it. As soon as the administration started, to my shock and amazement, they went at lightning speed to build the digital control grid, particularly the data centers. "The blizzard of actions were coming so fast and furious that I started to have to keep a list just to remember them. Finally, we put up a collection that we update every week. It's called the Fast Approaching Digital Control Grid. "At the Solari Report, you can see the updated list to see what's coming together. Okay, so where is this all going? Where's the financial coup going? Our government in the United States is a balance of power between the bankers and the people's representatives. "Since 1913, the Federal Reserve and the bankers. So the Federal Reserve is essentially. The train tracks are run by 12 private banks which are privately owned by the banks. They run the financial train tracks. They run the sort of, monetary policy. Then we have the people's representatives. We vote for representation. They determine the taxes and how those taxes will be spent. "And it's implemented by the executive branch. So you have this balance of power. The bankers run monetary policy, and the people's representatives run fiscal policy. And that's what the revolution was all about. It was taxation with or without representation. Where they want to go is the bankers now want to control fiscal policy. With digital money they have the technology now to institute control of both monetary and fiscal policy. And that is where they are going."

Sense Receptor

16,283 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I’ve been keeping a very close eye on the Reserve Bank’s moves toward a digital future. During this exchange with Governor Bullock, I pressed for clarity on exactly where they are headed with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) and the "unified digital currency" the big banks have been whispering about. I asked about developments in both domestic and international settlements. The Governor admitted that while they ran a pilot back in 2023, the focus has shifted. They aren't looking at a "retail CBDC" right now, which would be digital cash for everyday shopping. Instead, their focus is firmly on looking at how to settle "tokenised assets." Tokenised financial products, also called asset tokens, are a way to turn traditional money-related things into digital versions that live on blockchain technology, the same as that used by Bitcoin and Ethereum. These could include shares, real estate, artworks and precious metals. Normally these are hard to buy and/or sell quickly, especially in small amounts, and often involve lots of paperwork, middlemen and high minimum investments. Tokenisation changes that by creating a digital token that acts like a certificate of ownership for a piece (or all) of that real thing. The token is recorded on a blockchain, which is theoretically secure. You would be able to buy a share of a home, business, art or precious metals within minutes, allowing small investments to grow your savings more than bank interest would do. Note: This technology is not there yet! The RBA is scoping it out - as many institutions are. I will continue to monitor these experiments to ensure that this doesn't come at the cost of our financial privacy or sovereignty. — Senate Estimates

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

32,669 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

#WATCH | Kolkata, West Bengal: AITC National General Secretary and TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee says, "The INS warships and Rafale are yet to be deployed. Do that too. The thing that you should be doing against Bangladesh and Pakistan, you are doing it against the people of Bengal and call us Bangladeshi. So those who talk about fear and trust, people are watching who are creating an environment of fear and terror in Bengal, and people will answer for it." "BJP can try every trick from their rule book. They will fall flat on their faces when the results come out. You don't know the people of Bengal... I will be in the Amtala's control room." "I am not a political astrologer. I have said Trinamool's tally will increase. I stick to my claim what I said one year back. What I said one year ago was that Trinamool's vote percentage will increase and with a bigger majority than 2021. Trinamool is going to form the government for the fourth time, and I will meet you on the 4th." "If voters are being lathi-charged, then how will there be a fear-free election? If you have stopped 30 lakh people from voting, then who is spreading the atmosphere of terror and fear? These people say one thing and do another. They promised Rs 15 lakh and Amit Shah's party built a party office worth Rs 1500 crore. So if you are talking about fear, then they are the ones spreading fear and Didi and Trinamool are giving assurance that you should vote. Use your rights and give Bengal such a majority that in the coming days, these people will be forced to think 100 times before doing injustice to the Bengalis and Bengal."

ANI

13,944 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Anyone who tells you that blockchains “eliminate the need for Swift” has no idea what they’re talking about Swift is not a payment network, it’s an interbank messaging network Their SwiftNet private key infrastructure and banking messaging standards like ISO20022 are used by 11,000+ banks globally to facilitate the communication of payment instructions between banks Imagine taking 11,000 banks, who already have private keys and standardized formats for messaging, and connecting them to blockchains in a way they can re-use all of this existing infrastructure and messaging standards That’s exactly what Swift and Chainlink have been working on for years Last year, Swift published a report on how Chainlink CCIP can successfully connect Swift-member banks to any public/private blockchain using their existing infrastructure and messaging standards (12+ of the largest global financial institutions and FMIs were involved): Just yesterday, Swift published an article on how they’re moving forward on real-world solutions that will enable Swift members banks to access/transact with tokenized assets / currencies on the Swift network They note this builds upon their prior work, which they’re now advancing to the next stage (they explicitly link to their work with Chainlink): Swift isn’t going away, and their involvement in the blockchain ecosystem will massively accelerate the adoption of tokenized assets / currencies / stablecoins within the financial system Attached clip of Sergey Nazarov explaining this at Consensus 2024 on stage with Swift’s Jack Pouderoyen (Digital Assets & Currencies at Swift) I wonder how much longer this misconception about blockchain “killing” Swift will continue to persist in our industry I recommend paying attention to Sibos 2024

Zach Rynes | CLG

56,209 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The attached video is an interesting clip from a news article just before the referendum vote. Make no mistake, the black population was ready for a fight and if the vote was NO, that we would have had a full on civil war on our hands. The question that I have to ask myself, after seeing with my own eyes many, many times how the mobs scatter after the first bullet flies, is how they would have stood up to the Armed Forces of the Republic. Should it have resulted in an outright war and the gloves were completely off, my personal feelings are that the numerical advantages of the enemy would have been neutralised by artillery and airstrikes into the townships. Not that I would have ever hoped for this, but this is the reality of war. With water, power and supplies cut off and disease spreading, I do not think that the 'majority' could have held out forever. Wouter Basson could have been properly unleashed and entire townships wiped out with poisoned water supplies and other nefarious means. Let's not even talk about our nuclear weapons, which would have most certainly drawn other nuclear powers into the war, some with us and some against us. Nukes aside, we would have had our work cut out for us with communist reinforcements arriving from neighbouring countries. SWAPO were formidable opponents and with them now well equipped, we could have faced some indiscriminate artillery shelling of our own cities and population areas. The Mozambicans were battle hardened by that stage and also a formidable enemy. As always, we would have had to deal with traitors and sympathisers from our own people. As an officer, I would have been responsible for executing traitors and deserters which would not have been nice, or that nice depending on how one looks at it. The whole country would have definitely come to a standstill, possibly for decades, the losses would have been devastating on both sides, and we would not have gotten to enjoy the 1995 World Cup victory, the wonderful 1990's or any day as we know it since then. Every single day from then until now would have been different. Some of my children would not have been born and I would have most certainly lost many loved family members, friends and brother comrades-in-arms, if not my own life. My best friend through my service lives down the road from me and I see him at least a couple of times a week. For that I am blessed. I am not saying that we could not have won, I am just asking if it would have been worth it. Come to think about it. I am glad that peace prevailed, in whatever iteration of peace that we call this. It hurts real bad to think that we laid down our arms and handed over governance of our beloved South Africa to an organised crime syndicate masquerading as a political party. Ultimately true intentions are judged by results and there is nobody alive that can not see plain as day, that the intention of the ANC all along was just to loot the country for themselves without a care in the world for anybody else. They took it all and threw everybody else the scraps. A tear runs down my face when I think of what we could have become and how those wonderful late 90's could have gone on forever. How do we fix this?

Pookie's Polls & Opinions

13,374 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Trump scores legal win, getting lawsuit against Iowa pollster, Des Moines Register moved to state court | Brian Flood, Fox News Trump’s legal team alleges 'election interference' after late-stage poll showed Kamala Harris ahead in Iowa President Donald Trump notched a legal victory Friday in his lawsuit against Iowa pollster J. Ann Selzer and The Des Moines Register, and the case will now land in Iowa State Court after an appeals court sided with the president and ruled a lower court had overstepped. Trump’s legal team, which has accused the defendants of "brazen election interference" with their final 2024 Iowa presidential poll that showed him trailing Democrat Kamala Harris, originally requested the case be moved to Iowa State Court in May after the defendants "removed" the case to federal court. A federal judge denied the request at the time, but the Obama-appointed judge was overruled by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit. In a sharply worded opinion, the 8th Circuit granted Trump’s petition for a writ of mandamus — a rare judicial order used to correct clear legal errors — and directed a district judge to treat the case as dismissed "without prejudice," allowing Trump to refile the case. "Today’s just and appropriate ruling by the 8th Circuit ensures that President Trump’s powerhouse case focused on the fake election interfering polls conducted and denominated by J. Ann Selzer, The Des Moines Register and its corporate owner Gannett will be litigated in Iowa State Court where it belongs," a spokesman for Trump’s legal team told Fox News Digital. "These defendants have repeatedly engaged in unlawful gamesmanship to avoid State Court, and that ends today," the spokesman continued. "President Trump will continue to hold those who traffic in fake news, lies and smears to account." Bob Corn-Revere, chief counsel for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), who represents Selzer, issued a statement. "The 8th Circuit ruling was focused entirely on a technical point of civil procedure and said nothing about the merits of the case. This case is every bit as frivolous today as it was yesterday, and that fact will be borne out in whatever forum it is finally resolved," Corn-Revere told Fox News Digital. Lark-Marie Antón, a spokesperson for The Des Moines Register's parent company, Gannett, believes the case belongs in federal court. "We are assessing the court’s decision. Given the nature of the case and that it involves the president of the United States as a plaintiff, we continue to believe the federal courts are the most appropriate forum for this lawsuit. In the event the suit is heard by the state courts of Iowa, we have confidence the matter will be adjudicated fairly," Antón told Fox News Digital. The lawsuit was originally filed in December in Polk County, Iowa, and sought what it calls "accountability for brazen election interference committed by" The Des Moines Register and Selzer "in favor of now-defeated former Democrat candidate Kamala Harris through use of a leaked and manipulated Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll" published Nov. 2, 2024. "The Harris Poll was no ‘miss’ but rather an attempt to influence the outcome of the 2024 Presidential Election," the lawsuit stated at the time, adding that "defendants and their cohorts in the Democrat Party hoped that the Harris Poll would create a false narrative of inevitability for Harris in the final week of the 2024 Presidential Election." Selzer released her final Des Moines Register-sponsored poll showing Harris leading Trump by three points in Iowa just three days before the election. That shock poll showed a seven-point shift from Trump to Harris from September, when he had a four-point lead over the vice president in the same poll. Selzer’s poll was hyped up by the media in the days leading up to the election as her polling predictions had been historically accurate. Many suggested it implied a monumental shift in Midwest support for Harris in a red state, but the poll turned out to be way off. Trump thumped Harris in Iowa by more than 13 percentage points, the third straight time he'd won the state and the first time any candidate had won there by double digits since 1980. Shortly after the election, Selzer announced she was done with election polling and moving on to "other ventures."

Owen Gregorian

93,754 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Everybody needs a digital ID, say heads of state and high-tech leaders. They give many reasons: it will stop illegal migration; it will increase efficiency; it will protect privacy; and it will prevent online fraud and data ransoming. But we don’t need digital IDs for any of those things. The US just stopped illegal migration without digital IDs. Our online activities are more efficient than ever and it’s hard to see how they could get more efficient without sacrificing privacy and safety. And centralizing data through digital IDs, which could link social media, vaccine, and banking information, in ways that allow government control, would undermine cybersecurity because having separate log-ins for our financial, health, shopping, banking, credit card, and other data makes sure that if one is hacked they aren’t all hacked. “All your information in one place is a hacker’s dream,” said an Oxford University IT expert. “We already have countless ways we can provide our identity – passports, driving licences, and so on.” Many Americans likely think that digital IDs are only something people in Britain have to worry about. Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week declared that every working person there must have digital ID, or “BritCard”. The U.S. should never allow such a thing. A digital ID that linked our social media, vaccine records, and bank accounts could allow governments to censor and control the population, violating our free speech and privacy rights. Those Americans should think again. We are rapidly moving to the exact same digital ID surveillance and control system as the British. Real IDs contain embedded microchips that bring us one step closer to digital IDs. State governors are pushing it. Gavin Newsom last year allowed drivers licenses onto Apple and Google wallets. This “mobile drivers license,” or mDL, is a digital ID, and one more link in the chain. And it is Americans, including Bill Gates and the controlling owner of Oracle, Larry Ellison, who are financing the digital ID push. “ The NHS [National Health Service] in the UK has an incredible amount of population data, but it’s fragmented,” he told Blair in February of this year. “It’s not easily accessible by these AI models. We have to take all of this data we have in our country and move it into a single, if you will, unified data platform… The secret is to get all of that data in one place.” In September, Ellison made clear that he viewed the power of data centralization in behavior change. “Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly watching and recording everything that’s going on.” Ellison’s Oracle is an AI database cloud computing company and he is its best salesman. Ellison, the second richest man in the world, and owner of CBS and CNN, has “donated or pledged at least £257m to the Tony Blair Institute,” reportedthe New Statesman last week. “Ellison donations have helped it grow to more than 900 staff, working in at least 45 countries.” The nightmare scenario for mass, constant spying on citizens is not theoretical. China in 2019 created a social credit system with rewards that include better employment, school admissions, and shorter wait times in hospitals, and punishments including denial of access to public services and social events, denial of train and air tickets, and public shaming. One study found that at least one-third of total “offenses” were not actually against the law and thus expanded “local government authority into moral and social domains beyond the law,” found researchers. UK’s Big Brother Watched recently warned that a digital ID system, even if initially limited, could be a gateway to more invasive government surveillance and intrusion. Why would any liberal and democratic Western government like Britain want such a thing? Money is no doubt a big part of it. Oracle and other high tech companies stand to make billions taking bits of our money here and there for every transaction. Governments like Keir Starmer’s also seem eager to give them billions in contracts to monitor and analyze the population. We found no evidence Starmer would personally benefit financially from digital IDs, however, and as a political leader, he must consider whether his actions are popular, and digital IDs are not. A YouGov poll released yesterday found UK opinion toward digital IDs was 42 percent in favor and 45 percent against. And given the negative reaction to them online, popular opposition will likely rise. Tony Blair Institute’s (TBI) polling may have misled Starmer. TBI’s first question primed people to think about how inconvenienced they’ve felt without a digital ID, a blatantly manipulative form of polling. No honest pollster seeking to give a client a realistic understanding of how the public thought about digital IDs would have started with that question, because they know the importance of framing. The second question was equally biased. “Some are suggesting the government should introduce a new app, allowing instant access to a range of public services.” The framing suggests awareness on the part of the pollster that the public had a negative view of “digital ID,” hence the use of the “app” euphemism. The third question was “Do you think there is digital technology that could help tackle these issues... Processing asylum seekers and managing the UK’s borders.” One reason to think Starmer relied on the TBI’s biased polling is that Starmer pitched the digital ID as necessary to stop mass migration. “I know working people are worried about the level of illegal migration into this country,” said Starmer. “Digital ID… will make it tougher to work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure.” The notion is absurd. Nations have maintained borders for hundreds of years without the need for digital IDs. Given how badly the Starmer government’s digital ID roll out appears to have backfired, why did Starmer and Blair push it? One possibility is that they really believe in the mission of improving people’s lives. That is already how they justify it. Said Starmer, “it will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to prove your identity to access key services swiftly - rather than hunting around for an old utility bill.” But it is hard to believe Starmer and Blair really viewed the difficulty of finding where you left your utility bill as a high-priority social problem. It appears more likely that they are hiding their reasons and that the real motivation is the same as the Chinese government: to control the population. Gates last year released a Netflix documentary calling for sweeping AI-powered censorship of people he disagrees with on vaccines and other issues. The Starmer government’s digital IDs should be a wake-up call to all of us. For years, various people have been raising concerns about digital IDs but free speech and privacy advocates have clearly not done enough to stop them. That needs to change. The good news is that the backlash to the digital IDs appears strong and growing. And anyone can see that, when they spoke, Blair was taking instructions from Ellison. “You can pipe this data from these three thousand separate data sources into a single unified database,” said Ellison, “and that’s what we need to do.” The episode should wake us Americans up to the continuing threat of total surveillance and censorship. Powerful American high-tech elites see dollar signs in controlling our data — and our behavior. As such, this episode has motivated my colleagues and me to do more on this issue, including making grants to people doing investigative reporting, research, documentary filmmaking, policy development and policy advocacy on digital IDs. Please email [email protected] to get involved, and consider making a tax-deductible donation. And if you’re not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support our award-winning investigative journalism, which is essential to revealing the truth about censorship and digital IDs.

Michael Shellenberger

1,354,765 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Let’s talk about community notes. FYI, I’m a community notes contributor. What I am seeing is a direct attempt to silence, censor, de-prioritise, de-monetise, isolate & cast doubt against anyone that questions the current plans of Governments, Big Pharmaceutical & The Parasitic ruling classes. Enterprising Desert Raven, is the user name for a single Community Notes Contributor. Since joining Community Notes in March 2023 it has posted nearly 5000 community notes. A Bot? A Group of paid agenda activists? Or 3 Letter agencies? One thing is for sure, in my opinion, it’s impossible to be a single person. It is posting over 70 Community Notes per day, every day. Without rest. These notes have to be backed up with linked supporting evidence. It is just not possible to achieve this on a daily basis This is a relentless attack on anyone that dares to questions the things that have happened to us, or the plans they have in place for humanity. Community Notes works on a basis that when a Contributor sees a post and wishes to correct that post. They create a Note that provides information and links to data that support their note. When enough Contributors approve the Note, it goes live. If Contributors don’t agree with the note, they state why and can add counter information, it’s then not published, but left pending unless other contributors then agree with the original Note, then it goes live. Attached is a video all of the Community Notes that Desert Raven has added, both published and pending in just the last 10 days. This is from within the CN section so you will not normally get to see this. The vast majority of these notes are in pending waiting to go live. The video goes on forever! It’s only the last 10 days worth. Impossible for a single user to create. There is no doubt you will know someone in this video that they have attempted to censor. You will notice the recurring themes. Desert Raven protects the Jabs, Big Pharma, Current Government Regimes, Climate Change & the WEF. Anyone that questions what’s going on, that has a large follower base appears to be targeted, especially Blue Ticks. The Community Notes that have been approved, all appear to be supported by the same group of contributors. This is really bad and extremely concerning. I will individually contact every single person that has had an attempt to de-popularise their posts in this video. Elon Musk You urgently need to do a complete audit of community notes, especially targeting the most active contributors. They are either bots, or groups of bad actors working together to utilise a single account and push an agenda. IP and Mac Address access would easily identify this. I’m a community notes contributor and I am telling you that the system is compromised.

Chris Littlewood

3,152,602 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Last year we The Maggie Oliver Foundation were supporting several survivors who had been unlawfully strip searched, unlawfully arrested and treated inhumanely by Greater Manchester Police . We had repeatedly highlighted these cases through the complaints system with Greater Manchester Police and Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham, but our calls for action fell on deaf ears. We therefore spoke to Sky News who did a great expose of what was going on. Once the media were involved Mayor of Greater Manchester I believe felt he had no choice but to announce another independent review, this time led by Vera Baird DBE KC with whom we worked. We supported 5 victims through the whole process and their evidence was critical in the final report, which heard from 15 victims in the end. Her report said the treatment of these women (and 2 men) was BARBARIC, and she actually made 40 recommendations. Many of the victims made serious complaints to Greater Manchester Police Last week a report was published described in the video below. To the best of my knowledge only ONE of the 15 victims of Baird have had any outcome to their complaint, 18 months after submission! And that response was a whitewash, woefully inadequate for the treatment she received. Not ONE officer has ever been disciplined, sacked or held accountable for their BARBARIC treatment. 14 victims still no closure! So forgive me for being angry and disillusioned that here we have a tick box PR Exercise before the victims themselves have even had any closure. Furthermore their voices form no part in this “report”, a back slapping exercise in my opinion. In fact many improvements mentioned here should be a given anyway- sanitary products for females in custody, female officers, female and child cells etc etc I welcome no more “welfare strip searches” but my take is that these should be extremely rare anyway and in the cases we were involved in they were simply used as a tool in the abuse of power. On a more positive note though I do feel Greater Manchester Police are much more willing to engage/work with us under the new Chief than his predecessor Ian Hopkins or Peter Fahy but I’m disappointed that we have this “report” published before the victims have even had any meaningful closure. To me it feels like putting the “cart before the horse” and the wrong way round altogether, and that is a big step backwards imo.

Maggie Oliver

18,607 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr