Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

After Showing Wanda’ vision, Tony literally created Vision going against everyone because he believed Vision would always protect humanity from external threats, whether the Avengers were alive or not. Vision who was Tony’s creation comes with Dr Banner, Jarvis, Ultron intelligence and charged up by thor lightning, literally a...

279,752 views • 9 days ago •via X (Twitter)

25 Comments

𝕮𝕠𝕝𝕕𝔸𝕦𝕣𝕒's profile picture
𝕮𝕠𝕝𝕕𝔸𝕦𝕣𝕒9 days ago

Vision was always going to be nerfed cause Thanos had to win

zn's profile picture
zn9 days ago

Everyone missed this. He was injured by Corvus Glaive's weapon, which has special powers. Vision even says it: "The blade...it stopped me from phasing." It also stopped his body from repairing itself. Yes the plot had to diminish Vision but MCU picked a plausible way to do it.

Principal 🇬🇧's profile picture
Principal 🇬🇧9 days ago

I keep saying vision is the most useless character in avengers. A very un-needed character in the movie.

STOKES's profile picture
STOKES9 days ago

He is just an toy for wanda nothing else

Nicolas Calderón Jauregui's profile picture
Nicolas Calderón Jauregui8 days ago

Because he was in love, same with Wanda, Wanda was nerfed too

ppenguin95's profile picture
ppenguin959 days ago

They made Vision so weak it was embarrassing

court✊🏾's profile picture
court✊🏾9 days ago

Made hulk a str8 pussy smh

Dim kim 🌟's profile picture
Dim kim 🌟8 days ago

Avengers usually made us believe that any villain they are fighting is the most powerful then they will come up with another most powerful villain in their next movie 🍿

CyanideLove_'s profile picture
CyanideLove_9 days ago

Yeah taking the mind stone from vision was one of the dumbest ideas . He could’ve solo’d the entire army of cannon fodder

Leroy's profile picture
Leroy9 days ago

Vision got to be the weakest “super hero” in the MCU. Like how does he always get whooped and has to be saved from anyone he battles? Catch a body dude sheesh

CyanideLove_'s profile picture
CyanideLove_9 days ago

All Wanda had to do was use her chaos magic around thanos forearm 🤷🏽‍♂️

Dolfi Besari's profile picture
Dolfi Besari9 days ago

I thought vision was so strong

ᗪᑭᖇOᗰᗩ✞Iᑕ's profile picture
ᗪᑭᖇOᗰᗩ✞Iᑕ9 days ago

This vision is just useless after all the power he has

Monet King 🥶🥶🥶 (Ø,G) 🧑‍🌾 (🤞, ✨ )'s profile picture
Monet King 🥶🥶🥶 (Ø,G) 🧑‍🌾 (🤞, ✨ )9 days ago

@grok which movie is this

Cavaliers 2016 Champions's profile picture
Cavaliers 2016 Champions8 days ago

Yeah, I never understood why vision turned out to be such a wuss

Jon's profile picture
Jon9 days ago

Did my nig vision worng

Ricardo Souza's profile picture
Ricardo Souza9 days ago

Visão totalmente nerfado

Dracusa369's profile picture
Dracusa3698 days ago

Because it makes for good movie even if it doesn't make sense.

Ñîçê's profile picture
Ñîçê8 days ago

I'm a DC but I love this movie

Esco's profile picture
Esco9 days ago

You’re a bot

Michael's profile picture
Michael9 days ago

Why do we even have Black Panther? He’s the weakest shittiest one what does he actually do?

Boston Knick's profile picture
Boston Knick8 days ago

Vision is hella powerful any other time except in this movie

NightWalker 🔫💀's profile picture
NightWalker 🔫💀9 days ago

@grok what's the title?

Sponge Dawg and 553 others's profile picture
Sponge Dawg and 553 others8 days ago

Why the F would you fly lower to ground when you can fly high and they have this guy the Captain America Shield lol

MLbaker's profile picture
MLbaker8 days ago

why is Vision so lame in this movie? pussy

Related Videos

Tesla’s vision-only approach to solve FSD got laughed at for many years. People called it reckless, said just cameras would never be enough, and even claimed Tesla was cutting corners. Fast forward to today, it’s pretty clear who was right. “It’s so obvious you can solve this with cameras. Why wouldn’t you solve with cameras? It’s 2026. The self-driving problem is not a sensor problem, it’s an AI problem. The cameras have enough information already. It’s a problem of extracting the information, which is an AI problem.” - Ashok Elluswamy, VP of AI at Tesla. Just like us humans, we drive with eyes, we walk with eyes, literally we do everything with our eyes. We don’t have lidar spinning and laser beams on our heads. We simply see the world and our brain figures it out… all from vision. For so many years, the industry treated autonomy like it was a hardware problem. Like “if cameras struggle, just add more sensors.” That’s exactly how companies like Waymo ended up with sensor towers that look like crazy science projects. So ugly btw too… That approach might have made sense in 2008, but not today! Bc back then, AI wasn’t good enough to truly understand the world. So engineers had no choice but to lean on lidar and radar for help. But today, cameras capture insane amounts of information, I’m talking billions of pixels every second. The thing that was missing was AI intelligence. And when AI can understand why a car is slowing or why a pedestrian is hesitating, or real world things, you just need a better brain instead of more sensors. And now, everyone else is realizing this… the future of autonomy was always about understanding the world through vision, just like we humans do. That’s the bet that Elon and Tesla made early on… he was already years ahead of everyone, when everyone was doubling down on LiDAR and radar, even when so many people mocked them for switching early. Tesla vision for the win!!! 🥇

Teslaconomics

19,357 views • 7 months ago

John Krafcik, Former Waymo CEO thinks Tesla can’t solve autonomy with a vision-only approach. “Human vision is so much more capable than the vision of a car equipped with seven 5-megapixel cameras — only one of which is narrow-view, while all the others are wide-view. So you’re basically dispersing those 5 megapixels in a way that makes the actual effective vision more like 20/60 or 20/70. The rest of the cameras in a car like that wouldn’t even pass a DMV vision test. If you compare that to a serious L4 company, they’re really trying to achieve superhuman perception with an amazing array of cameras — with extraordinary 360° coverage, redundancy at the corners of the car, on the roof, high and low, everywhere. And then you have LiDAR and radar providing completely different modalities of active sensing to complement the passive sensing from the cameras. That’s truly superhuman. With that level of data, you can do amazing things — as opposed to a car that has a really bad case of myopia, should be wearing glasses, and operates on a very limited data cycle. I think that’s the core challenge the current iteration of camera-only cars faces: they don’t have superhuman vision. They just don’t. And without superhuman vision, it seems pretty unlikely to me that you’re going to achieve superhuman driving capability. If you’re not going to achieve superhuman driving capability, why are you even bothering, right? That’s the whole point of this.” 😂😂

Nic Cruz Patane

152,119 views • 8 months ago