Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

After the last call, my nurse practitioner Whitney and I processed how ridiculous it is that the person scheduled to speak with me, reviewing the careful documentation and clinical notes, was not a plastic surgeon. We fight for our patients and work so hard, but also see the absurdity...

17,628 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

INSANE 🚨 This surgeon has a patient who needs a “deep flap” surgery. Insurance denied it To appeal she had to speak to her patients insurance. “I actually asked, do you know what a deep flap is? THE DOCTOR SAID NO.” The insurance companies deciding if Americans get their procedures DONT EVEN KNOW what the procedures are. How is this okay?! THIS is the state of American healthcare… “You may remember I had a patient who needs a deep flap, and the insurance company denied an inpatient stay for her. So I had to schedule a peer to peer call and schedule time out of my day to ask for a conversation directly with someone who is my peer to discuss deep flap surgery and why that patient needed to be overnight. That call was scheduled for 11AM, and eleven came around 11: 30, 11: 45 and no call still. And then we emailed the insurance company because, of course, they don't give me the call number. They only let me receive the call. So finally at 12: 15, I received the call that was initially scheduled for 11. And the doctor who called me was not a surgeon. And I actually asked the doctor, do you know what a deep flap is? And the doctor said no. So that's where we are. My patient has insurance. She's seeing someone who's fellowship trained in microsurgery, me, to do her breast reconstruction, and I'm having to teach another doctor what a deep flap is in order to justify her overnight stay to navigate her insurance. This is completely ridiculous.”

Wall Street Apes

1,292,441 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

My last case of 2025 and my first case of 2026 tell you everything you need to know about our healthcare system. Last week, I was scheduled to do a DIEP flap for a patient who had been waiting a long time. We had asked her insurance company if we could do the surgery in network at @Redbudsurgerycenter, where we have everything needed to safely and efficiently take care of her. They hadn’t approved that, so the surgery had to be scheduled at an older hospital in town. When we arrived, the hospital was having HVAC issues. The humidity levels were not safe for surgery. We waited for hours, and ultimately the case had to be canceled. It wasn’t just her surgery. Multiple surgeries were canceled that day because operating under those conditions would have been a fire risk. We weren’t able to reschedule her surgery before the end of the year, which means her deductible resets. I could have safely done her surgery at Redbud that day but insurance rules wouldn’t allow it. This is what closed networks and rigid systems look like in real life. Now here’s the contrast. The first case I’m doing in 2026 is also a woman who needs breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps. This time, instead of traditional insurance, her employer uses a third party administrator. They came to me directly and asked what I would charge if they paid fairly and transparently. On Monday, we’re doing her bilateral DIEP flap at @Redbudsurgerycenter. I can control the environment, the costs, and the care. It’s better for the patient and significantly less expensive for the employer. This is called Direct Specialty Care. It’s not direct primary care. It’s specialty care delivered without unnecessary barriers. It’s happening. We’re starting the year this way. And I’m going to keep pushing the boundaries and keeping you informed.

Elisabeth Potter MD

136,464 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Board Certified OBGYN exposes what they must go through just to get one prescription approved by health insurance companies “This is what doctors are dealing with in 2025. So my patient needs a medication, an indicated medication for her condition. So I send the prescription to the commercial pharmacy - The pharmacist tells me that this medication needs a prior authorization and sends me a fax with a 1-800 number - The 1-800 number leads me to a pharmacy benefit manager that wants to ask my npi, my date of birth, the patient's information, what kind of the prescription is, how long do they need it for. Only to tell me at the end of the phone call that I actually have to call the patient's insurance company to authorize the prior authorization for the needed medication - So I call the patient's insurance company and once again, I have to verify my information, the patient's information, the prescription information, what the patient needs it for, only for the insurance company to tell me that this is not how they do prior authorization - So they're going to have to fax me some forms that I'm not allowed to do a prior authorization on the phone - So then the fax comes through and I fill it all out. The patient's information, my information, my npi, what the prescription is, how long they need it for, clinical documentation. And now we sit and wait and see if the powers that be think that the patient actually needs the medication” “I went to school. I went to undergraduate medical school, 4 years of OBGYN residency, then went back and did an integrative medicine fellowship, all for these people to dictate how my patient gets cared for. Please know that your healthcare providers are fighting for you day in and day out on things we don't get reimbursed for.” US Healthcare Insurance executives need to be thrown in prison for what they’ve done to our healthcare system

Wall Street Apes

415,111 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I got a call from insurance asking me to justify why my patient—who had a bilateral mastectomy and DIEP flap reconstruction—needed to stay in the hospital for two days. For context: ✅ She had bilateral mastectomies. ✅ She had complex microsurgery (DIEP flaps). ✅ She required continuous blood-flow monitoring with specialized Vioptix. ✅ Written approval from UnitedHealthcare dated July 17. And yet, AFTER surgery, during clinic, I was told I had to do a same-day “peer-to-peer.” I did not request this call. I was exhausted after seeing 65 patients in two days and heading to the hospital to care for the patient I posted about last week (the MRI/expander case). The physician on the line was polite but said the state of Texas required her to call, and she either (1) didn’t know authorization had already been granted or (2) didn’t have access to the medical records that would have answered the question. This was approved because my staff is incredible. As soon as Ebonie heard I was being pulled into a last-minute review, she printed the approval letter and put it in my hand while I was still in clinic. That’s what it takes to practice medicine right now. This is what we mean by insurance interrupting care. Instead of focusing on healing, teams are pulled off the floor to re-prove the obvious and re-justify decisions already authorized. I would like you to ask yourself: — Is this system helping us care for patients or wearing us down? — Why am I forced to ask permission to do the right thing, repeatedly, and then defend it after the fact? Patients deserve monitoring and support after a surgery of this magnitude. They deserve our full attention not red tape.

Elisabeth Potter MD

20,697 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

EVERYONE NEEDS TO SEE THIS 🚨 American doctor exposes new internal change to Blue Cross prior authorization process to deny coverage for Americans - They’ll only speak to the doctor who put in request - They WONT SAY WHAT NUMBER THEY’RE CALLING FROM - They’ll ONLY CALL ONCE - If they miss the call, the patient will be denied coverage for treatment “Now Blue Cross is saying that they will only do their peer to peer reviews by calling the doctor who is asking for the treatment to be authorized. And they will only call once, and they won't tell you when they're calling, and they won't tell you what number they're calling from.” “So if you're a doctor seeing patients and you have your phone on do not disturb because you're seeing patients or you just don't answer numbers that you don't recognize, and you're seeing patients and you don't wanna interrupt a a patient visit, you're gonna miss the call. And guess what? The treatment will not be authorized” “They're getting more creative about how to deny your claims or just not authorize your treatment at all. I'm going on information given to me by Blue Cross. I am a physician. When we physicians ask for a treatment to be authorized by an insurance company and they deny authorization, what happens at that point is that we are asked to do a peer to peer review, meaning that we, the doctor asking for the treatment, have to speak with the doctor who is employed by the insurance company, who is there only to say no.” THIS IS INSANE

Wall Street Apes

1,465,616 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr