正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

AGAIN, I will never stop sharing this. And I’ll never understand why it wasn’t highlighted and played before the jury. The old man that walked around the confrontation, was in a conversation with John immediately before, then walked around it all and went outside and had a long conversation...

justlarry315's profile picture

Just Larry

2,958 subscribers

298,674 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育喜剧
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Larry Tanoury Jr. 的头像
Larry Tanoury Jr.2 年前

Here is a longer, uncut version that shows the very aggressive and challenging gestures Higgins makes as he walks out the door.

David W. Fitzgerald, MD 🌐 的头像
David W. Fitzgerald, MD 🌐2 年前

Jackson did mention this in closing and told the jury to watch it in deliberations, but he should’ve played it.

Larry Tanoury Jr. 的头像
Larry Tanoury Jr.2 年前

@mdpats97 I was very happy when he mentioned it. I hope they go and watch it. I would’ve played it for them and ended my summation with John walking out with that glass to go to 34F. Fade to black. Like a movie ending.

SayWhat 的头像
SayWhat2 年前

AJ did mention this timestamp in closing, right?

Larry Tanoury Jr. 的头像
Larry Tanoury Jr.2 年前

He did. I hope the jury watches it. If they even need to. I’ve learned to always expect the unexpected from juries. But this case, even if anyone “thinks” KR may have hit him, is so riddled with holes and reasonable doubt that it should take maybe an hour or two to totally acquit.

Abby Chabby 的头像
Abby Chabby2 年前

This is great, Larry! I agree, this video unlocks the key to the chain of events. I think the evidence confirms that it happened exactly how you described it. I wish Jackson had focused on this video more as well, especially in the closing.

Larry Tanoury Jr. 的头像
Larry Tanoury Jr.2 年前

I wish he did too. I would’ve ended my summation with it and then with John walking out with that glass at 12:11 to go to 34F. Then fade to black. Like the end of a movie.

Not Mass-Compliant 🇺🇸 的头像
Not Mass-Compliant 🇺🇸2 年前

If they don’t have the witness, they don’t have the content of that heated discussion. Not much to say but speculate at that point.

Larry Tanoury Jr. 的头像
Larry Tanoury Jr.2 年前

With the fact that Higgins lied by saying he never talked to John as he left, I’d say it would be much more than speculation. It would be more of inferring based on the obvious evidence and testimony during trial.

Heinz 🦂 (Ketchup Man) 的头像
Heinz 🦂 (Ketchup Man)2 年前

@Chrissi16228964 I can hazard a guess and say it wasn’t played because Defense feared the jury might mistake and think they are trying to prove a hoax. I thought the closing toed the line and only implied reminding them that they don’t have to prove anything. Hence why you saw no exhibits

Larry Tanoury Jr. 的头像
Larry Tanoury Jr.2 年前

@DrHeinzOfficial @Chrissi16228964 That’s a good thought but they went full in with the theory of being framed and killed in 34F. Why not finish with the knockout blow being this video that ends the night like a movie scene?

相关视频

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: "We think [John O'Keefe] died around 12:25 or 12:30am [on 1/29/22]." - Karen Read Hank Brennan just played multiple new, never-before-seen, Karen Clips in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen admitted she knew John was dead by 12:30am, which is the just 2 minutes before Karen's car shows a backup event and John's phone then stopped moving on a lawn (while Karen was drunk driving with a BAC between 0.14-0.28, which is 2-4 times the legal limit). That's it, it's over. Only Karen was around John at 12:30am on 1/29/22 (and all the data and evidence proves it). Hank Brennan may have just won this case (using Karen's own, secret, words to a film crew). Oh my word. In other clips, Karen admitted to making a three point turn at 12:24am (confirmed by Karen's Lexus data) before sitting with John outside Fairview until roughly 12:31am (and also to arriving back at John's home before 12:41am that morning). Watch live as testimony continues with exclusive Karen Cam footage, and chat with the towel friends, here -
2:53

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: "We think [John O'Keefe] died around 12:25 or 12:30am [on 1/29/22]." - Karen Read Hank Brennan just played multiple new, never-before-seen, Karen Clips in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen admitted she knew John was dead by 12:30am, which is the just 2 minutes before Karen's car shows a backup event and John's phone then stopped moving on a lawn (while Karen was drunk driving with a BAC between 0.14-0.28, which is 2-4 times the legal limit). That's it, it's over. Only Karen was around John at 12:30am on 1/29/22 (and all the data and evidence proves it). Hank Brennan may have just won this case (using Karen's own, secret, words to a film crew). Oh my word. In other clips, Karen admitted to making a three point turn at 12:24am (confirmed by Karen's Lexus data) before sitting with John outside Fairview until roughly 12:31am (and also to arriving back at John's home before 12:41am that morning). Watch live as testimony continues with exclusive Karen Cam footage, and chat with the towel friends, here -

Grant Smith Ellis

50,984 次观看 • 1 年前

The Commonwealth's theory in the #KarenReadTrial is that Karen, while drunk, angry and on the heels of a spat with John O'Keefe, backed up her car at 24mph, struck him around 12:31am-12:32am, and then left him to succumb to his massive head injury and the cold. We know from the forensic data on O'Keefe's phone that he moved for the last time, 36 steps in 20 seconds of movement, between 12:31am - 12:32am. His cell phone remained under his body, with the battery temperature dropping and the cameras obstructed, from 12:32am until he was found just after 6am, in the same spot Karen admits she left him. Karen's phone, on the other hand, connected to John's wifi at 12:36am. Karen states she left John near the flag pole and went straight to his house. Judging by the drive time, all illustrated below, she left John at the flagpole outside of 34 Fairview Road at the exact time that he stopped moving forever. Let that sink in. The drive from 34 Fairview road to John's home on Meadows Ave is 3 minutes, 41 seconds.
4:19

The Commonwealth's theory in the #KarenReadTrial is that Karen, while drunk, angry and on the heels of a spat with John O'Keefe, backed up her car at 24mph, struck him around 12:31am-12:32am, and then left him to succumb to his massive head injury and the cold. We know from the forensic data on O'Keefe's phone that he moved for the last time, 36 steps in 20 seconds of movement, between 12:31am - 12:32am. His cell phone remained under his body, with the battery temperature dropping and the cameras obstructed, from 12:32am until he was found just after 6am, in the same spot Karen admits she left him. Karen's phone, on the other hand, connected to John's wifi at 12:36am. Karen states she left John near the flag pole and went straight to his house. Judging by the drive time, all illustrated below, she left John at the flagpole outside of 34 Fairview Road at the exact time that he stopped moving forever. Let that sink in. The drive from 34 Fairview road to John's home on Meadows Ave is 3 minutes, 41 seconds.

Masshole Mafia

169,778 次观看 • 1 年前

There are some truths about Nigeria that if you hear, you go tear cloth just dey cry… I SUPPORT THE USA 100% This guy’s testimony in this video is the major reason I believe that Tolulope Arowolo was killed. I have shared a story before on how a Nigeria soldier who got a BH member arrested & handed over to the authorities saw that same BH member on the war front again weeks later. This time around he killed the BH member. After killing the BH member, he was summoned to the Head Quarters & was asked why he killed the BH member. He was even arguing that this BH member was so good that he has been killing a lot of the soldiers & he had to end him otherwise he will be out again if arrested. The said soldier was no more after being summoned - colleagues later discovered he was shot in the head, by who? They believed their superiors did it cos he never returned to the war field. Nigeria is a very annoying place with unimaginable atrocities going on & you think the US is doing too much? You are an animal if you think so.
2:04

There are some truths about Nigeria that if you hear, you go tear cloth just dey cry… I SUPPORT THE USA 100% This guy’s testimony in this video is the major reason I believe that Tolulope Arowolo was killed. I have shared a story before on how a Nigeria soldier who got a BH member arrested & handed over to the authorities saw that same BH member on the war front again weeks later. This time around he killed the BH member. After killing the BH member, he was summoned to the Head Quarters & was asked why he killed the BH member. He was even arguing that this BH member was so good that he has been killing a lot of the soldiers & he had to end him otherwise he will be out again if arrested. The said soldier was no more after being summoned - colleagues later discovered he was shot in the head, by who? They believed their superiors did it cos he never returned to the war field. Nigeria is a very annoying place with unimaginable atrocities going on & you think the US is doing too much? You are an animal if you think so.

DON “Tobechukwu” Ade 👑

217,108 次观看 • 10 个月前

"Whoever talked [John Cena] into this in the back is not his friend... It was awful. John Cena is not a legit badass, not in the slightest... I don't believe in my heart that John Cena understands what it means to tap and to pass out. They not only got him to tap and quit, he then fell asleep. Now he fell asleep as a way of saying I hung in there to the bitter end. It's just from a physiological standpoint, not possible." Chael Sonnen shares his thoughts on John Cena's final match.
2:44

"Whoever talked [John Cena] into this in the back is not his friend... It was awful. John Cena is not a legit badass, not in the slightest... I don't believe in my heart that John Cena understands what it means to tap and to pass out. They not only got him to tap and quit, he then fell asleep. Now he fell asleep as a way of saying I hung in there to the bitter end. It's just from a physiological standpoint, not possible." Chael Sonnen shares his thoughts on John Cena's final match.

Ariel Helwani

1,224,492 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just *Pow* in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? *Like, I mean, pow,* He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.
3:11

This is evergreen! When a young boy asks John MacArthur why didn’t Jesus just *Pow* in the garden when Eve ate the apple, He can stop it like that? Bible Questions and Answers, Part 70 — John MacArthur “I’m Joey Cusenza, and my question is, why didn’t Jesus stop Eve at the garden of Eden when she ate the fruit? *Like, I mean, pow,* He can just stop it like that. Why didn’t He?” JOHN: That is the most profound question of all questions: Why didn’t God stop Eve from eating the fruit? This theologians call the problem of theodicy: Why is there evil in the world? If God is absolutely holy, why is there evil in the world? That’s essentially that question: Why didn’t He stop it before it started? First of all, the broad answer is this: because God allowed her to eat that fruit, God allowed sin to come into the world, so that He could be glorified. Now God is a God of love, and He could express that love even in the perfection of the Trinity. And He expressed that love to Adam and Eve when He walked and talked with them before they sinned and before she ate. So God could express His love. But if there had never been a sin, there would never be forgiveness, there would never be mercy, there would never be grace, there would never be compassion, there would never be healing, there would never be restoration. And so, forever and ever, the angels would never be able to worship God for all those aspects of His nature. So God allows evil so that He can display grace and mercy and compassion because those also are attributes of God that can only be put on display through His response to sin. There’s another reason, and that is that God is holy and just and righteous. He would never be able to display ultimately what that means unless there were sinners to judge. So whether it is judgment on sin or whether it is salvation from sin, the fact that sin exists allows God to display eternally the glory of the full scope of His attributes. Okay? Great question. Thank you, bud.

Terri Green

132,183 次观看 • 5 个月前

Woah John Janssen is really mentioning it all. In this clip he goes into detail about the night Shannon crashed her car and got a DUI. I am actually shook how much John is spilling. First, John makes it clear that he would never release the videos of Shannon, he wouldn’t do that to her daughters. Also, in the new settlement where Shannon paid John 60k there was no non disparagement agreement… No wonder John is doing this interview now. John says the level of Shannon’s intoxication the night of the DUI was “shocking” and she went into an “extreme rage” over her missing phone. John says it was like Shannon was “possessed.” John knows what he is doing by using these dramatic words… He even says Shannon was “physically attacking” him and he had scratches all over. John also says Shannon was threatening his daughters and came within inches of hitting one of his daughters with her car. John says the entire audience has blown off the fact that Shannon “a drunk fool” almost hit his daughter… He’s like imagine if it was your kid. John says once he heard the crash his first instinct was to run towards it and Shannon but his daughter’s stopped him and said they would go and check it out. This is so damaging to Shannon. Wow John Wow. #RHOC
9:07

Woah John Janssen is really mentioning it all. In this clip he goes into detail about the night Shannon crashed her car and got a DUI. I am actually shook how much John is spilling. First, John makes it clear that he would never release the videos of Shannon, he wouldn’t do that to her daughters. Also, in the new settlement where Shannon paid John 60k there was no non disparagement agreement… No wonder John is doing this interview now. John says the level of Shannon’s intoxication the night of the DUI was “shocking” and she went into an “extreme rage” over her missing phone. John says it was like Shannon was “possessed.” John knows what he is doing by using these dramatic words… He even says Shannon was “physically attacking” him and he had scratches all over. John also says Shannon was threatening his daughters and came within inches of hitting one of his daughters with her car. John says the entire audience has blown off the fact that Shannon “a drunk fool” almost hit his daughter… He’s like imagine if it was your kid. John says once he heard the crash his first instinct was to run towards it and Shannon but his daughter’s stopped him and said they would go and check it out. This is so damaging to Shannon. Wow John Wow. #RHOC

Bye Wig Hello Drama

350,184 次观看 • 1 年前

jfk jr.’s last night alive (thursday, july 15, 1999). “that night, after john had gotten his cast removed, john and gary ginsberg went together to the yankees game. the pair were driven by car service to yankee stadium to attend an interleague night game between the yankees and the atlanta braves. ginsberg had also invited to the game james and lachlan murdoch, rupert's two sons. they all sat together in the box of george steinbrenner, the yankees' owner. part of the idea was to have john meet the murdoch sons to see if there might be some interest in news corporation replacing hachette as john's partner for george. george was not the only topic of conversation that evening. gary recalled, "it was not a good last night for john. i think his most immediate concern was "what do i do with george?" it was an unsettling period. there were a lot of unknowns in his personal and professional life. but what he was talking about that night was running for governor against pataki. there was a lot of uncertainty. he didn't want to get divorced. he was a sticker, not someone who looked to get out of things. he looked at his sister's marriage and saw how happy it was and wanted the same for himself. so i'm thinking, in a perfect world, it all works out". in the long car ride to and from the stadium, gary talked with john about his political ambitions. john mentioned that he was eyeing the new york governor's race in 2002. "that's the race", john told gary. he had stopped brooding over the senate seat that hillary clinton had moved to claim. "i'm intellectually and temperamentally better suited to be an executive than a legislator," he said. "my dad didn't like it, either", he revealed, referring to his father's time in the house and the senate. john felt he could beat incumbent george pataki, a bland moderate republican who was seeking a third term. john realized that he had to get his house in order before he could make the move. He worried whether carolyn would ever be emotionally capable of dealing with him running for office. and then there was george, which was hanging like a dark shadow over his future ambitions. "he was looking for a graceful way out of george", ginsberg recalled. the yankees lost to the atlanta braves that night, 6-2, and after the game john and gary shared a car home. gary recalled they spoke about john's dealings with jack kliger. john confessed that after kliger said he was cutting george loose, john had felt both depressed and liberated — depressed because he hadn't expected kliger's decision, liberated because now the worst had happened and he knew he would survive it. he had felt uncomfortable with kliger, john admitted. he had a problem with male authority figures. gary pointed out that that was understandable, given that john's father was a national hero. john also admitted that he'd been thinking about death a lot lately.. anthony radziwill's sickness was weighing on him. instead of going to his loft in lower manhattan, john instructed the driver to head south on fifth avenue. he would be staying at the stanhope hotel, at 81st and fifth. he told gary that he had lost his keys. john returned to the stanhope, arriving shortly after 1:00 a.m. "he was limping uneasily on his crutches and in obvious pain", said jeffrey jones, the hotel's night clerk.”
0:32

jfk jr.’s last night alive (thursday, july 15, 1999). “that night, after john had gotten his cast removed, john and gary ginsberg went together to the yankees game. the pair were driven by car service to yankee stadium to attend an interleague night game between the yankees and the atlanta braves. ginsberg had also invited to the game james and lachlan murdoch, rupert's two sons. they all sat together in the box of george steinbrenner, the yankees' owner. part of the idea was to have john meet the murdoch sons to see if there might be some interest in news corporation replacing hachette as john's partner for george. george was not the only topic of conversation that evening. gary recalled, "it was not a good last night for john. i think his most immediate concern was "what do i do with george?" it was an unsettling period. there were a lot of unknowns in his personal and professional life. but what he was talking about that night was running for governor against pataki. there was a lot of uncertainty. he didn't want to get divorced. he was a sticker, not someone who looked to get out of things. he looked at his sister's marriage and saw how happy it was and wanted the same for himself. so i'm thinking, in a perfect world, it all works out". in the long car ride to and from the stadium, gary talked with john about his political ambitions. john mentioned that he was eyeing the new york governor's race in 2002. "that's the race", john told gary. he had stopped brooding over the senate seat that hillary clinton had moved to claim. "i'm intellectually and temperamentally better suited to be an executive than a legislator," he said. "my dad didn't like it, either", he revealed, referring to his father's time in the house and the senate. john felt he could beat incumbent george pataki, a bland moderate republican who was seeking a third term. john realized that he had to get his house in order before he could make the move. He worried whether carolyn would ever be emotionally capable of dealing with him running for office. and then there was george, which was hanging like a dark shadow over his future ambitions. "he was looking for a graceful way out of george", ginsberg recalled. the yankees lost to the atlanta braves that night, 6-2, and after the game john and gary shared a car home. gary recalled they spoke about john's dealings with jack kliger. john confessed that after kliger said he was cutting george loose, john had felt both depressed and liberated — depressed because he hadn't expected kliger's decision, liberated because now the worst had happened and he knew he would survive it. he had felt uncomfortable with kliger, john admitted. he had a problem with male authority figures. gary pointed out that that was understandable, given that john's father was a national hero. john also admitted that he'd been thinking about death a lot lately.. anthony radziwill's sickness was weighing on him. instead of going to his loft in lower manhattan, john instructed the driver to head south on fifth avenue. he would be staying at the stanhope hotel, at 81st and fifth. he told gary that he had lost his keys. john returned to the stanhope, arriving shortly after 1:00 a.m. "he was limping uneasily on his crutches and in obvious pain", said jeffrey jones, the hotel's night clerk.”

mah

1,254,738 次观看 • 5 个月前

I remember when I was young, around 10-11 years old. My parents were both asleep as was my brother. I heard a knock on the back door which was weird because who uses the back door at a stranger’s house? The kitchen window was close by so I take a look. It looked like a teenager but hard to tell because they had a hoodie with the hood up. I didn’t open the door but I did crack the window and asked them what they wanted. They replied they were lost and wanted to come in to warm up and use the phone. Even when it’s daylight I know never to let anybody in period that I didn’t know, but a stranger after midnight was weird enough. I said no because I didn’t know them. Then they said that hey knew my dad and that’s why he came by. I said that’s fine and all but I’m not letting you use our phone. This was before cellphones were widely used, we had a landline like most people. The person wouldn’t take no for an answer and I could sense he was getting angry. I went and woke up my dad, I told him there was somebody at the back door and that he said they knew him. He walked to the door and looked out and said he didn’t know him. But he did talk through the door and told him that he was calling the police and that he should just leave. The person just stood there until the police finally came and even they asked him what he was doing knocking on the door at that hour. He told them he was lost and thought this was a house of a family friend. The police told him my dad didn’t know him and made him leave. So was this a case of wrong house or was he up to something. It makes me still wonder to this day but I’m still glad I never opened the door.
0:54

I remember when I was young, around 10-11 years old. My parents were both asleep as was my brother. I heard a knock on the back door which was weird because who uses the back door at a stranger’s house? The kitchen window was close by so I take a look. It looked like a teenager but hard to tell because they had a hoodie with the hood up. I didn’t open the door but I did crack the window and asked them what they wanted. They replied they were lost and wanted to come in to warm up and use the phone. Even when it’s daylight I know never to let anybody in period that I didn’t know, but a stranger after midnight was weird enough. I said no because I didn’t know them. Then they said that hey knew my dad and that’s why he came by. I said that’s fine and all but I’m not letting you use our phone. This was before cellphones were widely used, we had a landline like most people. The person wouldn’t take no for an answer and I could sense he was getting angry. I went and woke up my dad, I told him there was somebody at the back door and that he said they knew him. He walked to the door and looked out and said he didn’t know him. But he did talk through the door and told him that he was calling the police and that he should just leave. The person just stood there until the police finally came and even they asked him what he was doing knocking on the door at that hour. He told them he was lost and thought this was a house of a family friend. The police told him my dad didn’t know him and made him leave. So was this a case of wrong house or was he up to something. It makes me still wonder to this day but I’m still glad I never opened the door.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

117,258 次观看 • 12 天前

John Stockton says he had never heard Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” before the Super Bowl and did not know whether the lyric about him was a compliment or an insult “I knew of this song. I had never heard it. And then the Super Bowl hits and everybody heard it. I didn’t even know what it meant. It sounded like it wasn’t uncomplimentary, so I said, ‘That’s pretty good stuff’” Maverick: “The lyric was, ‘I’mma pass on his body like John Stockton.’ Do you know what that means?” John: “Well, it’s a reference to passing… If it was an insult, I missed it. But I’ll take it as a compliment” (via The Maverick Approach)
0:44

John Stockton says he had never heard Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” before the Super Bowl and did not know whether the lyric about him was a compliment or an insult “I knew of this song. I had never heard it. And then the Super Bowl hits and everybody heard it. I didn’t even know what it meant. It sounded like it wasn’t uncomplimentary, so I said, ‘That’s pretty good stuff’” Maverick: “The lyric was, ‘I’mma pass on his body like John Stockton.’ Do you know what that means?” John: “Well, it’s a reference to passing… If it was an insult, I missed it. But I’ll take it as a compliment” (via The Maverick Approach)

dank

864,113 次观看 • 1 天前

KAREN READ: HER CRUMBLING CASTLE OF LIES AND WHY THE GARAGE LIE WON'T WORK During Read’s second trial, the defense began to float a theory that John O’Keefe was killed in the garage at 34 Fairview. This was a departure from their previous version of events wherein they claimed stair flight data on John’s phone proved he was in the house and had been killed in the basement, a claim Alan Jackson boldly stated on Nightline. To bolster this theory, Karen Read departed from her previous story of looking at her phone when John left the car, the story she told in that same episode of Nightline and changed it during her Dateline interview and stated she physically saw John go to the door of the home and “cross the threshold.” But as more evidence became available during the lead up to the second trial, it was clear this theory would no longer work. The high-quality location data on John’s phone showed he never left the flagpole area after he exited Read’s car, which is exactly where he was found early the next morning. The temperature readings on John’s showed the device never went from a cold environment to a warm environment, like entering a home. His health data only showed 36 steps indicating he hadn't walked far when he left the car. And so, in the weeks before the trial, Read and her team went to work concocting their new theory. They took the low-quality location data, the data generated when the cell phone signal weakens and expands and, in this case, included the very front of the house/garage area, and began to spin a tale that John was killed in the garage. They saturated social media with their new garage story, going so far as to take a picture of stain spilled on the garage floor and imply it was a blood stain. But the story doesn’t work. While the garage at 34 Fairview is attached to the house, there is no entry from the home into the garage or vice versa. One can only enter the garage from outside the house either by utilizing the overhead door or through use of an outdoor side door. Since Read has already claimed to have physically seen John cross the threshold of the home, this would mean John would have had to have gone into the home then would have been marched back out of the home by the "House defendants" with Chloe in tow to the garage, beaten by the group and attacked by Chloe in the garage, and then moved back to the flagpole area in less than a minute without registering any steps. There is zero evidence to support any of this occurred, and in fact, the data on John’s phone shows it is pure fiction. And it is absurd. The evolving theory Read and her team are spinning as well as its numerous machinations are the result of one thing: retrofitting the available evidence to create any scenario, no matter how implausible, to point the finger away from Read. Strange, as this is exactly what they have accused MSP and the witnesses of doing in Read’s civil suit. Imagine that. I guess the old saying is true, every accusation is a confession. Well, at least with Read it is. #karenreadlies #defendthetruth
1:54

KAREN READ: HER CRUMBLING CASTLE OF LIES AND WHY THE GARAGE LIE WON'T WORK During Read’s second trial, the defense began to float a theory that John O’Keefe was killed in the garage at 34 Fairview. This was a departure from their previous version of events wherein they claimed stair flight data on John’s phone proved he was in the house and had been killed in the basement, a claim Alan Jackson boldly stated on Nightline. To bolster this theory, Karen Read departed from her previous story of looking at her phone when John left the car, the story she told in that same episode of Nightline and changed it during her Dateline interview and stated she physically saw John go to the door of the home and “cross the threshold.” But as more evidence became available during the lead up to the second trial, it was clear this theory would no longer work. The high-quality location data on John’s phone showed he never left the flagpole area after he exited Read’s car, which is exactly where he was found early the next morning. The temperature readings on John’s showed the device never went from a cold environment to a warm environment, like entering a home. His health data only showed 36 steps indicating he hadn't walked far when he left the car. And so, in the weeks before the trial, Read and her team went to work concocting their new theory. They took the low-quality location data, the data generated when the cell phone signal weakens and expands and, in this case, included the very front of the house/garage area, and began to spin a tale that John was killed in the garage. They saturated social media with their new garage story, going so far as to take a picture of stain spilled on the garage floor and imply it was a blood stain. But the story doesn’t work. While the garage at 34 Fairview is attached to the house, there is no entry from the home into the garage or vice versa. One can only enter the garage from outside the house either by utilizing the overhead door or through use of an outdoor side door. Since Read has already claimed to have physically seen John cross the threshold of the home, this would mean John would have had to have gone into the home then would have been marched back out of the home by the "House defendants" with Chloe in tow to the garage, beaten by the group and attacked by Chloe in the garage, and then moved back to the flagpole area in less than a minute without registering any steps. There is zero evidence to support any of this occurred, and in fact, the data on John’s phone shows it is pure fiction. And it is absurd. The evolving theory Read and her team are spinning as well as its numerous machinations are the result of one thing: retrofitting the available evidence to create any scenario, no matter how implausible, to point the finger away from Read. Strange, as this is exactly what they have accused MSP and the witnesses of doing in Read’s civil suit. Imagine that. I guess the old saying is true, every accusation is a confession. Well, at least with Read it is. #karenreadlies #defendthetruth

Julie Carpenter

16,742 次观看 • 9 个月前

'The John Frum Cargo Cult is found on the island of Tanna in Vanuatu - a small country in the Pacific. The name derives from the man they worship - a (potentially fictional) character who many now believe was a WWII soldier called John who simply told locals he was “John from America” but they misinterpreted it as his name being “John Frum”. The John Frum Cargo Cult meet up every Friday evening and spend 12 hours straight singing songs about John Frum and how one day he’ll return to Tanna and bring with him wealth for the islanders.' (From @janetnewenham on Insta
1:14

'The John Frum Cargo Cult is found on the island of Tanna in Vanuatu - a small country in the Pacific. The name derives from the man they worship - a (potentially fictional) character who many now believe was a WWII soldier called John who simply told locals he was “John from America” but they misinterpreted it as his name being “John Frum”. The John Frum Cargo Cult meet up every Friday evening and spend 12 hours straight singing songs about John Frum and how one day he’ll return to Tanna and bring with him wealth for the islanders.' (From @janetnewenham on Insta

Protestia

23,677 次观看 • 1 年前

I’m trying to reconcile a few parts of Jen’s testimony across both trials, and I’m genuinely curious how others interpret her testimony and the dash cam footage. In the second trial, Jen says she didn’t realize it was John until she got close and saw Kerry wiping snow from his face. She describes being shocked, frozen, and only then understanding it was him. But during the 911 call, sheanswers yes to the dispatcher when he asked if John had “hit his head.” If she had just realized it was John in that moment and described being stunned and unsure how did she already know (or conclude) that he had hit his head? Also, Jen describes getting into the police cruiser with Karen and Kerry, where they held hands, prayed, and talked while John was being moved to the ambulance. This is notable because she testified to a very similar sequence in the first trial as well, placing that interaction during the time John was being moved. However, dashcam footage shows John being moved around 6:14–6:15, with all three women visible outside the cruiser at that time. I’m not drawing conclusions, I’m just trying to understand how these details fit together across both versions of testimony and the video timeline. If anyone has a clear way to reconcile this, I’d really like to hear it.
1:35

I’m trying to reconcile a few parts of Jen’s testimony across both trials, and I’m genuinely curious how others interpret her testimony and the dash cam footage. In the second trial, Jen says she didn’t realize it was John until she got close and saw Kerry wiping snow from his face. She describes being shocked, frozen, and only then understanding it was him. But during the 911 call, sheanswers yes to the dispatcher when he asked if John had “hit his head.” If she had just realized it was John in that moment and described being stunned and unsure how did she already know (or conclude) that he had hit his head? Also, Jen describes getting into the police cruiser with Karen and Kerry, where they held hands, prayed, and talked while John was being moved to the ambulance. This is notable because she testified to a very similar sequence in the first trial as well, placing that interaction during the time John was being moved. However, dashcam footage shows John being moved around 6:14–6:15, with all three women visible outside the cruiser at that time. I’m not drawing conclusions, I’m just trying to understand how these details fit together across both versions of testimony and the video timeline. If anyone has a clear way to reconcile this, I’d really like to hear it.

Dixie Normus

14,265 次观看 • 4 个月前

Maureen O'Hara on what she whispered into John Wayne's ear in the final scene of John Ford's "The Quiet Man" (1952): "No matter what part of the world I’m in, the question I am always asked is: “What did you whisper into John Wayne’s ear at the end of 'The Quiet Man'?” It was John Ford’s idea; it was the ending he wanted. I was told by Mr. Ford exactly what I was to say. At first I refused. I said, “No. I can’t. I can’t say that to Duke.” But Mr. Ford wanted a very shocked reaction from Duke, and he said, “I’m telling you, you are to say it.” I had no choice, and so I agreed, but with a catch: “I’ll say it on one condition—that it is never ever repeated or revealed to anyone.” So we made a deal. After the scene was over, we told Duke about our agreement and the three of us made a pact. There are those who claim that they were told and know what I said. They don’t and are lying. John Ford took it to his grave—so did Duke—and the answer will die with me. Curiosity about the whisper has become a great part of the Quiet Man legend. I have no doubt that as long as the film endures, so will the speculation. 'The Quiet Man' meant so much to John Ford, John Wayne, and myself. I know it was their favorite picture too. It bonded us as artists and friends in a way that happens but once in a career. That little piece of 'The Quiet Man' belongs to just us, and so I hope you’ll understand as I answer: I’ll never tell." ("Tis Herself A memoir", Maureen O'Hara & John Nicoletti, 2004) P.S: Remembering John Wayne on his 119th birthday! What do you think she whispered into the Duke's ear?
1:04

Maureen O'Hara on what she whispered into John Wayne's ear in the final scene of John Ford's "The Quiet Man" (1952): "No matter what part of the world I’m in, the question I am always asked is: “What did you whisper into John Wayne’s ear at the end of 'The Quiet Man'?” It was John Ford’s idea; it was the ending he wanted. I was told by Mr. Ford exactly what I was to say. At first I refused. I said, “No. I can’t. I can’t say that to Duke.” But Mr. Ford wanted a very shocked reaction from Duke, and he said, “I’m telling you, you are to say it.” I had no choice, and so I agreed, but with a catch: “I’ll say it on one condition—that it is never ever repeated or revealed to anyone.” So we made a deal. After the scene was over, we told Duke about our agreement and the three of us made a pact. There are those who claim that they were told and know what I said. They don’t and are lying. John Ford took it to his grave—so did Duke—and the answer will die with me. Curiosity about the whisper has become a great part of the Quiet Man legend. I have no doubt that as long as the film endures, so will the speculation. 'The Quiet Man' meant so much to John Ford, John Wayne, and myself. I know it was their favorite picture too. It bonded us as artists and friends in a way that happens but once in a career. That little piece of 'The Quiet Man' belongs to just us, and so I hope you’ll understand as I answer: I’ll never tell." ("Tis Herself A memoir", Maureen O'Hara & John Nicoletti, 2004) P.S: Remembering John Wayne on his 119th birthday! What do you think she whispered into the Duke's ear?

DepressedBergman

259,346 次观看 • 3 个月前

In Top Gun, John Travolta was the first choice for Maverick but was too expensive. Tom Cruise initially turned it down too. Producers had to take him up on an F-14 and flip him and do all kinds of stunts to turn him around and make sure he never got back in a cockpit. But it was just the opposite. He landed and he walked over to a phone booth and called the producer and said, “Jerry. I’m making the movie. I love it.’
1:38

In Top Gun, John Travolta was the first choice for Maverick but was too expensive. Tom Cruise initially turned it down too. Producers had to take him up on an F-14 and flip him and do all kinds of stunts to turn him around and make sure he never got back in a cockpit. But it was just the opposite. He landed and he walked over to a phone booth and called the producer and said, “Jerry. I’m making the movie. I love it.’

Emir Han

1,327,747 次观看 • 3 个月前

John Mulaney says Michael Jackson wasn’t unique for having no childhood because nobody born before 1910 had one John: “People always go, ‘Oh, poor Michael Jackson, he had no childhood.’ But you know who else didn’t? Anyone born before 1910” “And they didn’t marry children with a giraffe as a witness... it’s a pretty sacred cow in comedy to not go after it” Conan: “We now know why John was not asked to give the eulogy at Michael Jackson’s funeral” John: “I had a nice version. I was perfectly willing to call an audible and switch it on the fly”
0:45

John Mulaney says Michael Jackson wasn’t unique for having no childhood because nobody born before 1910 had one John: “People always go, ‘Oh, poor Michael Jackson, he had no childhood.’ But you know who else didn’t? Anyone born before 1910” “And they didn’t marry children with a giraffe as a witness... it’s a pretty sacred cow in comedy to not go after it” Conan: “We now know why John was not asked to give the eulogy at Michael Jackson’s funeral” John: “I had a nice version. I was perfectly willing to call an audible and switch it on the fly”

Yonan

601,770 次观看 • 15 小时前