正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

632,609 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

31 条评论

Matty Wise 的头像
Matty Wise1 年前

You should learn the rules of football Jim

Abdul Tim 的头像
Abdul Tim1 年前

Oh boy is this a bad tweet. That’s not a safety. Apologize to the shitbag refs.

Jason James 的头像
Jason James1 年前

It’s forward progress. I think they ruled his forward progress was outside the end zone and I’m pretty sure you cant challenge forward progress. I actually think they got it right.

Jedidiah 的头像
Jedidiah1 年前

The Seahawks made contact before the end zone and therefore he will get the benefit of stopping forward progress there. Would have been a waste of a challenge, refs had it right and saved him a challenge.

Nathan Jewett-Wolf 的头像
Nathan Jewett-Wolf1 年前

I fear you do not know the rule. Forward progress was outside the end zone and forward progress can’t be challenged.

NyHawk 的头像
NyHawk1 年前

People arguing forward progress explain to me how a QB running backwards trying to escape is considered fowards progress? Especially since the play+ball is still live and can be thrown despite the contact.

George 的头像
George1 年前

That’s just forward progress Jim

Lafferty, Daniel 的头像
Lafferty, Daniel1 年前

Forward progress is where you first get touched

Jake B 的头像
Jake B1 年前

Not a safety, bro. Tackle starts outside the end zone. He gets forward progress. Two officials in position to clearly see that's what happened. This is not a safety and it's not even close to a controversial call.

Nolan 的头像
Nolan1 年前

In this case the ball is spotted where it was when the defender made contact.

Brady 的头像
Brady1 年前

you don’t know the rule, jim

cam 的头像
cam1 年前

Billion dollar company!!!!

NYG 的头像
NYG1 年前

Contact was initiated outside the end zone, declares forward progress. Although strouds knee goes down in the end zone, the tackle starts at the 1. Refs got it right

Zach Miller 的头像
Zach Miller1 年前

You do not know ball. My 4th grader understands forward progress. I think I just realized you're playing dumb on purpose to get engagement and I am falling for it. I am but a weak man.....

Boston Globe Pitchbot 的头像
Boston Globe Pitchbot1 年前

“Mike McMystery, whatever the hell his name is, coach of the Seahawks…” 🤣🤣🤣

AP 的头像
AP1 年前

It’s not where the knee goes down, he was contacted before the goal line. It’s a forward progress situation.

Will 的头像
Will1 年前

Forward progress is an important factor with safeties. Wherever the defender initially engaged him is where he's going to be marked down. Forward progress is not a challengeable event by rule.

bM 的头像
bM1 年前

Clear safety if you dont understand the rules at all, sure… Wouldve been a lost challenge & burned timeout

Tony 🇺🇸 的头像
Tony 🇺🇸1 年前

In Jim’s NFL the QB gets picked up and carried into the end zone as many times as possible

Johnny BCCB 的头像
Johnny BCCB1 年前

Do you guys understand forward progress? This has been a rule for as long as I can remember.

Omaeja Ja 的头像
Omaeja Ja1 年前

Did some additional digging--cuz I'm a world-class time waster--and here's what I believe to be the situation: Comes down to--and this is a rules-driven argument, which sometimes differs from what the refs do--go figure--but comes down to whether Stroud was "driven" backward or whether Nwosu's initial contact was "minimal" thus making Stroud's retreat "voluntary." If minimal (Rule 7, Sec. 2), then it's Stroud's own momentum that carries him into the end zone--safety. If he was "driven" backward (Rule 3, Sec.12), then it's no safety, and the ball placed where the "restraint" occurred. If ref rules "minimal" = not driven back = voluntary = safety. If ref rules "significant" = driven back = involuntary = down where the restraint occurred. Looking at the replay, looks to me like it was Stroud's own direction/momentum (backwards, toward his own goal NOT forward) that carried him into the end zone. Although, can't really call Nwosu's contact 'minimal' either, cuz he caused Stroud to fall further in the direction he was already moving--toward the end zone. Below is a table, citing relevant rules and sections. And, because it's always good to stir the pot 😉I will also add that the catch by Seattle against Green Bay in the end zone (with the replacement refs) many years ago WAS a catch, because the tie goes to the receiver! Let'er rip! Go Hawks!

Vic Monte 的头像
Vic Monte1 年前

learn the rules. contact was made outside the goal line which would be forward progress stopped. now delete your account ya cuck

Jay 的头像
Jay1 年前

I agree but…They made up for it with the blatant no offsides call at the end of the game for the Seattle win

H-TOWN Sports 的头像
H-TOWN Sports1 年前

Good thing because he would have wasted a challenge. Google “forward progress”. 👍🏼

Trenten Scheidegger 的头像
Trenten Scheidegger1 年前

People who don't know the rules of football shouldn't be posting informational videos about football.

Deion Slanders 的头像
Deion Slanders1 年前

Seattle won by 8 points, what fucking difference does it make besides getting you interactions?

Coach Zach P 的头像
Coach Zach P1 年前

Contact started outside of the end zone making forward progress the 1 yard line. Please don’t talk about football If you don’t know about football …….

Apullio 🐸🌞 的头像
Apullio 🐸🌞1 年前

Forward progress brother, it is how they have called this play for as long as I have been alive, for better or for worse.

The Land 的头像
The Land1 年前

Is this a serious account? No joke. Have you ever studied the game of football, or even watched it aside from a clip here and there? How on earth are you a supposed expert on football when you have to have the term "forward progress" explained to you?

Josh V 的头像
Josh V1 年前

The tackle started on the other side of the line meaning forward progress so down at the 1 is the right call. Refs suck but this wasn’t a bad call sorry Jim.

〽️~BlueCrue~〽️ 的头像
〽️~BlueCrue~〽️1 年前

How much evidence do we need that this league is now complete bullshit? Do you know how much a safety pays in sports gambling, and how much money the league gets from them advertising AND paying for their data to set spreads?

相关视频