Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Again, prison.

632,609 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 31

Фото профиля Matty Wise
Matty Wise1 год назад

You should learn the rules of football Jim

Фото профиля Abdul Tim
Abdul Tim1 год назад

Oh boy is this a bad tweet. That’s not a safety. Apologize to the shitbag refs.

Фото профиля Jason James
Jason James1 год назад

It’s forward progress. I think they ruled his forward progress was outside the end zone and I’m pretty sure you cant challenge forward progress. I actually think they got it right.

Фото профиля Jedidiah
Jedidiah1 год назад

The Seahawks made contact before the end zone and therefore he will get the benefit of stopping forward progress there. Would have been a waste of a challenge, refs had it right and saved him a challenge.

Фото профиля Nathan Jewett-Wolf
Nathan Jewett-Wolf1 год назад

I fear you do not know the rule. Forward progress was outside the end zone and forward progress can’t be challenged.

Фото профиля NyHawk
NyHawk1 год назад

People arguing forward progress explain to me how a QB running backwards trying to escape is considered fowards progress? Especially since the play+ball is still live and can be thrown despite the contact.

Фото профиля George
George1 год назад

That’s just forward progress Jim

Фото профиля Lafferty, Daniel
Lafferty, Daniel1 год назад

Forward progress is where you first get touched

Фото профиля Jake B
Jake B1 год назад

Not a safety, bro. Tackle starts outside the end zone. He gets forward progress. Two officials in position to clearly see that's what happened. This is not a safety and it's not even close to a controversial call.

Фото профиля Nolan
Nolan1 год назад

In this case the ball is spotted where it was when the defender made contact.

Фото профиля Brady
Brady1 год назад

you don’t know the rule, jim

Фото профиля cam
cam1 год назад

Billion dollar company!!!!

Фото профиля NYG
NYG1 год назад

Contact was initiated outside the end zone, declares forward progress. Although strouds knee goes down in the end zone, the tackle starts at the 1. Refs got it right

Фото профиля Zach Miller
Zach Miller1 год назад

You do not know ball. My 4th grader understands forward progress. I think I just realized you're playing dumb on purpose to get engagement and I am falling for it. I am but a weak man.....

Фото профиля Boston Globe Pitchbot
Boston Globe Pitchbot1 год назад

“Mike McMystery, whatever the hell his name is, coach of the Seahawks…” 🤣🤣🤣

Фото профиля AP
AP1 год назад

It’s not where the knee goes down, he was contacted before the goal line. It’s a forward progress situation.

Фото профиля Will
Will1 год назад

Forward progress is an important factor with safeties. Wherever the defender initially engaged him is where he's going to be marked down. Forward progress is not a challengeable event by rule.

Фото профиля bM
bM1 год назад

Clear safety if you dont understand the rules at all, sure… Wouldve been a lost challenge & burned timeout

Фото профиля Tony 🇺🇸
Tony 🇺🇸1 год назад

In Jim’s NFL the QB gets picked up and carried into the end zone as many times as possible

Фото профиля Johnny BCCB
Johnny BCCB1 год назад

Do you guys understand forward progress? This has been a rule for as long as I can remember.

Фото профиля Omaeja Ja
Omaeja Ja1 год назад

Did some additional digging--cuz I'm a world-class time waster--and here's what I believe to be the situation: Comes down to--and this is a rules-driven argument, which sometimes differs from what the refs do--go figure--but comes down to whether Stroud was "driven" backward or whether Nwosu's initial contact was "minimal" thus making Stroud's retreat "voluntary." If minimal (Rule 7, Sec. 2), then it's Stroud's own momentum that carries him into the end zone--safety. If he was "driven" backward (Rule 3, Sec.12), then it's no safety, and the ball placed where the "restraint" occurred. If ref rules "minimal" = not driven back = voluntary = safety. If ref rules "significant" = driven back = involuntary = down where the restraint occurred. Looking at the replay, looks to me like it was Stroud's own direction/momentum (backwards, toward his own goal NOT forward) that carried him into the end zone. Although, can't really call Nwosu's contact 'minimal' either, cuz he caused Stroud to fall further in the direction he was already moving--toward the end zone. Below is a table, citing relevant rules and sections. And, because it's always good to stir the pot 😉I will also add that the catch by Seattle against Green Bay in the end zone (with the replacement refs) many years ago WAS a catch, because the tie goes to the receiver! Let'er rip! Go Hawks!

Фото профиля Vic Monte
Vic Monte1 год назад

learn the rules. contact was made outside the goal line which would be forward progress stopped. now delete your account ya cuck

Фото профиля Jay
Jay1 год назад

I agree but…They made up for it with the blatant no offsides call at the end of the game for the Seattle win

Фото профиля H-TOWN Sports
H-TOWN Sports1 год назад

Good thing because he would have wasted a challenge. Google “forward progress”. 👍🏼

Фото профиля Trenten Scheidegger
Trenten Scheidegger1 год назад

People who don't know the rules of football shouldn't be posting informational videos about football.

Фото профиля Deion Slanders
Deion Slanders1 год назад

Seattle won by 8 points, what fucking difference does it make besides getting you interactions?

Фото профиля Coach Zach P
Coach Zach P1 год назад

Contact started outside of the end zone making forward progress the 1 yard line. Please don’t talk about football If you don’t know about football …….

Фото профиля Apullio 🐸🌞
Apullio 🐸🌞1 год назад

Forward progress brother, it is how they have called this play for as long as I have been alive, for better or for worse.

Фото профиля The Land
The Land1 год назад

Is this a serious account? No joke. Have you ever studied the game of football, or even watched it aside from a clip here and there? How on earth are you a supposed expert on football when you have to have the term "forward progress" explained to you?

Фото профиля Josh V
Josh V1 год назад

The tackle started on the other side of the line meaning forward progress so down at the 1 is the right call. Refs suck but this wasn’t a bad call sorry Jim.

Фото профиля 〽️~BlueCrue~〽️
〽️~BlueCrue~〽️1 год назад

How much evidence do we need that this league is now complete bullshit? Do you know how much a safety pays in sports gambling, and how much money the league gets from them advertising AND paying for their data to set spreads?

Похожие видео