正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Again, To those attacking #Justice #KetanjiBrownJackson, let’s set the record straight. Justice Jackson didn’t vote against #SNAP—she issued a temporary stay to let the appeals process work. That’s not defunding, it’s due process. Her move protects long-term benefits by ensuring legal decisions aren’t rushed or reversed. She’s upholding the... show more

BMB Empower Network

18,929 subscribers

14,439 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

#Justice #KetanjiBrownJackson #SNAP

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Due process isn’t just “a court exists” or “they know they broke the law.” It’s the constitutional guarantee that before the government takes away someone’s liberty, it must follow fair procedures. That includes: •Clear notice of charges •Officers identifying themselves •A neutral judge •Access to legal counsel •The right to present evidence & challenge the government’s evidence •A written decision, with the chance to appeal The Constitution says “no person” shall be deprived of liberty without due process, not just citizens, not just when it’s convenient. Without due process and proper safeguards, it’s not justice, it’s an abuse of government power, and it’s antithetical to the Constitution. Full Story Here:

Due process isn’t just “a court exists” or “they know they broke the law.” It’s the constitutional guarantee that before the government takes away someone’s liberty, it must follow fair procedures. That includes: •Clear notice of charges •Officers identifying themselves •A neutral judge •Access to legal counsel •The right to present evidence & challenge the government’s evidence •A written decision, with the chance to appeal The Constitution says “no person” shall be deprived of liberty without due process, not just citizens, not just when it’s convenient. Without due process and proper safeguards, it’s not justice, it’s an abuse of government power, and it’s antithetical to the Constitution. Full Story Here:

Joe Walsh

22,295 次观看 • 1 年前

Here is a group of people attacking and pushing a man off a jetty after stripping him, allegedly for stealing. Street justice should never be accepted. Street justice could lead to innocent people being attacked cause it has no regard for facts or due process. It’s driven by anger and emotion in the heat of the moment, not truth always. This is wrong. HRC of the Maldives

Here is a group of people attacking and pushing a man off a jetty after stripping him, allegedly for stealing. Street justice should never be accepted. Street justice could lead to innocent people being attacked cause it has no regard for facts or due process. It’s driven by anger and emotion in the heat of the moment, not truth always. This is wrong. HRC of the Maldives

Hassan Kurusee

51,554 次观看 • 9 个月前

Dear @JacintaNgobese5 I see you and your colleagues have unlimited energy to fight for placement at Addington Primary 😭. Just a gentle reminder to use the right channels, not school gates and noise, but courts, lawmakers and actual legal processes. Let the kids learn in peace please, they didn’t write the Constitution. If you want to challenge it, take it to Parliament or the judge, not Grade 1. Whether illegal, legal, foreign or South African, the right to education is not a group assignment, it’s already in the syllabus

Dear @JacintaNgobese5 I see you and your colleagues have unlimited energy to fight for placement at Addington Primary 😭. Just a gentle reminder to use the right channels, not school gates and noise, but courts, lawmakers and actual legal processes. Let the kids learn in peace please, they didn’t write the Constitution. If you want to challenge it, take it to Parliament or the judge, not Grade 1. Whether illegal, legal, foreign or South African, the right to education is not a group assignment, it’s already in the syllabus

In A Nutshell🥜

59,964 次观看 • 8 个月前

Joe Mazzulla: “Too many times it’s all about winning... You have to surrender to the idea that when you’re going after that, you’re going to fail. We failed by not winning, but we stick to the process of being able to do that. That’s just the duality of how things work. It’s not an either-or thing. It’s both and, you feel both of those things.” (h/t SM Highlights)

Joe Mazzulla: “Too many times it’s all about winning... You have to surrender to the idea that when you’re going after that, you’re going to fail. We failed by not winning, but we stick to the process of being able to do that. That’s just the duality of how things work. It’s not an either-or thing. It’s both and, you feel both of those things.” (h/t SM Highlights)

Legion Hoops

519,877 次观看 • 5 个月前

I asked for the LONG BILL to be read at length today. Not to stall. Not for politics. But because what’s happening in this building is being buried, and the people of Colorado deserve time to SEE it. We’ve heard nonstop speeches about “protecting victims.” But as a victim of sexual harassment inside this Capitol, I was denied justice. No transparency. No accountability. Instead? It was buried. And the moment I stood up to say it from the well… Majority Leadership moved to shut it down. The Majority Leader rushed to lay the bill over—using a rule most people have never even heard of. Silenced. Again. Let that sink in. They will preach about victims— but when it’s one of their own? They shut it down. They bury it. They move on. So yes, I’m slowing this process down. Because this isn’t just about a $46 BILLION budget being rushed through in hours. It’s about a culture that protects itself instead of protecting victims. Colorado deserves honesty. Colorado deserves transparency. And victims deserve to be heard, not silenced.

I asked for the LONG BILL to be read at length today. Not to stall. Not for politics. But because what’s happening in this building is being buried, and the people of Colorado deserve time to SEE it. We’ve heard nonstop speeches about “protecting victims.” But as a victim of sexual harassment inside this Capitol, I was denied justice. No transparency. No accountability. Instead? It was buried. And the moment I stood up to say it from the well… Majority Leadership moved to shut it down. The Majority Leader rushed to lay the bill over—using a rule most people have never even heard of. Silenced. Again. Let that sink in. They will preach about victims— but when it’s one of their own? They shut it down. They bury it. They move on. So yes, I’m slowing this process down. Because this isn’t just about a $46 BILLION budget being rushed through in hours. It’s about a culture that protects itself instead of protecting victims. Colorado deserves honesty. Colorado deserves transparency. And victims deserve to be heard, not silenced.

Rep Brandi Bradley

14,687 次观看 • 5 个月前

Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri was removed not through accountability, but through manipulation. The Constitution of Pakistan is clear. Allegations against a sitting judge must be examined by the Supreme Judicial Council. That process exists to protect judicial independence, ensure due process, and prevent political interference. In this case, it was deliberately bypassed. Justice Jahangiri was denied a proper forum, the right to be heard, and a fair constitutional process. His removal was engineered through administrative pressure and procedural shortcuts, not through law. This was not oversight. It was an unlawful purge. To make this outcome possible, dissenting voices were silenced. On the day a key institutional review was scheduled, Dr. Riaz Ahmed was abducted to ensure he could not participate. His detention was not incidental. It was part of the same effort to control the process and force a predetermined result. He has since spoken publicly about his ordeal. The message is unmistakable. Judges who refuse to comply can be removed without the Supreme Judicial Council. Due process can be discarded. The Constitution can be treated as optional. This is not about one judge. This is about turning the judiciary into a controlled institution through fear and coercion. When judges are removed by unfair means, justice itself is on trial. This is undeclared martial law. #FascismUnderAsimLaw #FreeImranKhan

Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri was removed not through accountability, but through manipulation. The Constitution of Pakistan is clear. Allegations against a sitting judge must be examined by the Supreme Judicial Council. That process exists to protect judicial independence, ensure due process, and prevent political interference. In this case, it was deliberately bypassed. Justice Jahangiri was denied a proper forum, the right to be heard, and a fair constitutional process. His removal was engineered through administrative pressure and procedural shortcuts, not through law. This was not oversight. It was an unlawful purge. To make this outcome possible, dissenting voices were silenced. On the day a key institutional review was scheduled, Dr. Riaz Ahmed was abducted to ensure he could not participate. His detention was not incidental. It was part of the same effort to control the process and force a predetermined result. He has since spoken publicly about his ordeal. The message is unmistakable. Judges who refuse to comply can be removed without the Supreme Judicial Council. Due process can be discarded. The Constitution can be treated as optional. This is not about one judge. This is about turning the judiciary into a controlled institution through fear and coercion. When judges are removed by unfair means, justice itself is on trial. This is undeclared martial law. #FascismUnderAsimLaw #FreeImranKhan

PTI

25,098 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Republicans are the party of feelings over facts. Whatever they feel, is what they go with—regardless of whether or not there’s any supporting evidence. When it comes to the constitution and due process, it doesn’t work like that. We have a judicial system and legal processes for a reason, and you don’t just get to ignore it because of how you “feel”.

The Republicans are the party of feelings over facts. Whatever they feel, is what they go with—regardless of whether or not there’s any supporting evidence. When it comes to the constitution and due process, it doesn’t work like that. We have a judicial system and legal processes for a reason, and you don’t just get to ignore it because of how you “feel”.

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett

63,132 次观看 • 1 年前

“It’s kidnapping.” No. It’s ICE. Dad got detained. No phone call. She finds out while she’s at Raising Cane’s with the kids before soccer. Then the rest of the video: He’s been here for years. Before she was born. He tried. She says: “The process failed him.” He tried again. “In the process.” “Not even a criminal.” Open-heart surgery two months ago. That’s not a legal status. That’s a timeline of not having one. “The process failed him” means the process said no. “In the process” means it still isn’t done. “He’s been here for years” is how long the file sat open. Unfair is an argument. Unjust is a feeling. Kidnapping is a crime. Removal is a statute. If the strongest defense is Cane’s, soccer practice, and “you never thought it would hit home,” the home it hit was built on a maybe. Sorry lady, go join pops.

“It’s kidnapping.” No. It’s ICE. Dad got detained. No phone call. She finds out while she’s at Raising Cane’s with the kids before soccer. Then the rest of the video: He’s been here for years. Before she was born. He tried. She says: “The process failed him.” He tried again. “In the process.” “Not even a criminal.” Open-heart surgery two months ago. That’s not a legal status. That’s a timeline of not having one. “The process failed him” means the process said no. “In the process” means it still isn’t done. “He’s been here for years” is how long the file sat open. Unfair is an argument. Unjust is a feeling. Kidnapping is a crime. Removal is a statute. If the strongest defense is Cane’s, soccer practice, and “you never thought it would hit home,” the home it hit was built on a maybe. Sorry lady, go join pops.

DocumentingLibs

35,923 次观看 • 14 天前

The solution to the crisis of criminal aliens receiving SNAP benefits is not rocket science. Require proof of citizenship. That's it. Rep. Jeff Van Drew says they either need to provide an ID and proof of citizenship or be detained and deported. There is no in between: "If you're getting SNAP, that you have to be able to prove your citizenship. If you're not legal, you should be detained, go through due process, and then deported. Period. That's the answer to that." "The people we're giving money to laugh at America, hate America, commit crimes in America, and we give them stuff."

The solution to the crisis of criminal aliens receiving SNAP benefits is not rocket science. Require proof of citizenship. That's it. Rep. Jeff Van Drew says they either need to provide an ID and proof of citizenship or be detained and deported. There is no in between: "If you're getting SNAP, that you have to be able to prove your citizenship. If you're not legal, you should be detained, go through due process, and then deported. Period. That's the answer to that." "The people we're giving money to laugh at America, hate America, commit crimes in America, and we give them stuff."

Benny Johnson

177,177 次观看 • 11 个月前

The Home Office wants to clear the asylum appeals backlog not by resourcing the existing appeals system better. It wants to abolish the current judicial appeals body and build a new one staffed largely by non-legally trained adjudicators (members of the public who’ve done a training course). At the Justice Committee this week, I asked our expert witnesses whether this would just move the backlog into the Upper Tribunal (which would hear appeals against adjudicators). Prof Tomlinson rightly suggested that the Home Office should focus on getting the decision right first time (around 40-50% of Home Office decisions are reversed after appeal).

The Home Office wants to clear the asylum appeals backlog not by resourcing the existing appeals system better. It wants to abolish the current judicial appeals body and build a new one staffed largely by non-legally trained adjudicators (members of the public who’ve done a training course). At the Justice Committee this week, I asked our expert witnesses whether this would just move the backlog into the Upper Tribunal (which would hear appeals against adjudicators). Prof Tomlinson rightly suggested that the Home Office should focus on getting the decision right first time (around 40-50% of Home Office decisions are reversed after appeal).

Tony Vaughan KC MP

12,953 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨Dear Hakeem Jeffries, You stood in front of the country… and told us that the Supreme Court took away Black people’s right to vote. Let that sink in. That’s not a misunderstanding. That’s not a misquote. That’s not “spin.” That is a statement that does not match reality. No one lost their vote. No one was removed from the process. No ballots were taken. So the question becomes… Why say it? Why take something that is a legal debate about how districts are drawn… and turn it into a claim that people are being stripped of their fundamental rights? Because once you convince people they’re under attack… you don’t have to explain anything else. And that’s where this video starts. We’re going to break this down cleanly… step by step… no emotion, just facts… What the Court actually said… What Jeffries claimed… And why those two things don’t line up. If you sir, care about truth… if you care about being told what’s real and not what’s useful… Stay right here. Let’s get into it. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

🚨Dear Hakeem Jeffries, You stood in front of the country… and told us that the Supreme Court took away Black people’s right to vote. Let that sink in. That’s not a misunderstanding. That’s not a misquote. That’s not “spin.” That is a statement that does not match reality. No one lost their vote. No one was removed from the process. No ballots were taken. So the question becomes… Why say it? Why take something that is a legal debate about how districts are drawn… and turn it into a claim that people are being stripped of their fundamental rights? Because once you convince people they’re under attack… you don’t have to explain anything else. And that’s where this video starts. We’re going to break this down cleanly… step by step… no emotion, just facts… What the Court actually said… What Jeffries claimed… And why those two things don’t line up. If you sir, care about truth… if you care about being told what’s real and not what’s useful… Stay right here. Let’s get into it. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

138,054 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are human trafficking people in Minneapolis. In the video, you hear an agent say, “Do you have an ID?” And then seconds later say, “So you don’t have an ID?” and then immediately grab the woman and take her. He does not know who she is. He does not give her time to answer. He does not allow her to present identification. He simply seizes her and removes her so she can be placed in a detention facility while they “verify her status,” a process that financially benefits the agencies and contractors holding her. Taking someone by force, without verification, due process, or lawful justification, and transporting them for confinement and profit fits the definition of human trafficking. Calling it “enforcement” doesn’t change what it is.

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are human trafficking people in Minneapolis. In the video, you hear an agent say, “Do you have an ID?” And then seconds later say, “So you don’t have an ID?” and then immediately grab the woman and take her. He does not know who she is. He does not give her time to answer. He does not allow her to present identification. He simply seizes her and removes her so she can be placed in a detention facility while they “verify her status,” a process that financially benefits the agencies and contractors holding her. Taking someone by force, without verification, due process, or lawful justification, and transporting them for confinement and profit fits the definition of human trafficking. Calling it “enforcement” doesn’t change what it is.

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,198,573 次观看 • 8 个月前

DEMAND ACTION FROM THE SENATE! All eyes are in the upper house today as the House of Representatives transmitted the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte. True to their brand of inaction — they did not take the impeachment, transmitted to the Senate as early as 5:47 PM today. May I just remind the Senators of the Article XI, Section 3, Paragraph 4 of the 1987 Constitution: “In case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed.” FORTHWITH means “Immediately, At Once, Instantly, Right Away, Straight Away”. Again, as mentioned, impeachment proceedings are not bound by the legislative calendar. It is a constitutional process and not just a mere ordinary legislative process. Let us not let the personal agenda or personal fears of the Senate delay accountability and justice. #ImpeachSaraDuterteNOW

Just

138,819 次观看 • 1 年前