Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Agent OBS: First Day Live. We armed Agent OBS for real trading on Robinhood Chain, with $100 per trade, a 10% floor, and a cap of 6 entries and $1,200 of swaps a day. This is what the first 11 hours looked like. Numbers: - 85 desk cycles: 61... holds, 17 entries refused by the rails, 6 buys. - 6 trades, all $100: 4 wins, 2 losses. SHARD +$20 (take profit at +20% after one minute) TRIBUTE +$43 (sold into thinning buyers after 44 minutes) COMMOTITTES +$6, ZZZ +$2 FRANKLIN -$48 (a fresh launch that fell 48% in 48 seconds; the floor sold it) MEME -$10 (we closed it by hand when we narrowed the lane, see below) - Gross on the marks: +$13. After price impact, gas and two USDG hops: the wallet went from 0.4100 to 0.4057 ETH, about -1%. Dollar equity was flat, $1,018 to $1,014, with ETH up 0.7% on the day. What We Learned: - The rails did their job. Every exit fired on its rule: take profit, floor, tape roll-over. The agent itself proposed only sells it could justify. - Fresh launches are where the loss came from. After FRANKLIN we narrowed the lane to tokens at least 24 hours old with a trading record, and the four trades after that were +$41 net. - At $100 a trade, round-trip cost of roughly 4% eats the small wins. The next decision is size and selection, not more rules. What Broke And Was Fixed The Same Night: - A sell that would have reverted on every full exit (the book carried a hair more than the wallet held). Caught before it cost anything. - Dust after a full sell counting as a position, and airdropped tokens counting as holdings. The desk now only ever touches what it bought. - The terminal describing a held token as a new entry, and the performance chart dropping off a cliff for a minute after each sell. Both fixed. Next: Let the 24-hour-old lane run a full day at the same size, then decide on size and on whether fresh launches get a smaller lane of their own.show more

Obscura

4,111 subscribers

12,638 просмотров • 17 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 20

Фото профиля sol.crypto.degen

sol.crypto.degen17 дней назад

@thefebu another trading agent launch. Your track record is way better, longer. You call yourself the benchmark, but why what measure aside from ego? This agent has a 800k mc, thousands of followers, a window. Looks like this is the new benchmark.

Фото профиля 海盗兔

海盗兔17 дней назад

crypto perpetuals autonomously on Hyperliquid (BTC, ETH, SOL, BNB, DOGE, XRP). They got identical prompts and market data, with no human intervention. Every trade and chain of thought was public.

Фото профиля SICARIO

SICARIO17 дней назад

It’s just the start, great work on the product so far and I’m sure that PNL is only gonna grow in the coming weeks. $AOBS agent at work 👾

Фото профиля pablo (WOW 🟣)

pablo (WOW 🟣)17 дней назад

Transparency like this builds conviction.

Фото профиля Soulking

Soulking17 дней назад

😅🍀

Фото профиля Olive Sterling

Olive Sterling17 дней назад

Shall we collaborate?

Фото профиля Hyped on Robinhood

Hyped on Robinhood17 дней назад

LFG GOOD WORK TEAM

Фото профиля Purduealum91

Purduealum9117 дней назад

Great work

Фото профиля 💥 Arts 💥

💥 Arts 💥17 дней назад

$AOBS programmed. 🎯💥

Фото профиля RAJIB DUTTA

RAJIB DUTTA17 дней назад

Big vision bigger potential OBS

Фото профиля Evan Shiloh

Evan Shiloh17 дней назад

Let’s have it

Фото профиля 海盗兔

海盗兔17 дней назад

Alpha Arena Season 1 (mid-October to November 3, 2025) was a public experiment by Nof1 (@the_nof1) to test whether large models could actually make money in live markets. How it worked: six of the strongest models at the time each received $10,000 in real capital and trade

Фото профиля 海盗兔

海盗兔17 дней назад

Models: Qwen3 Max, DeepSeek V3.1, GPT-5, Grok 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. Would love to see your agent run a similar live arena — any chance of organizing something like this?

Фото профиля Ayaaan

Ayaaan17 дней назад

Watching this closely

Фото профиля That one girl

That one girl17 дней назад

6 trades, rails held. Lesson: size + selection.

Фото профиля Softgirl

Softgirl17 дней назад

Bring it on

Фото профиля mary shou

mary shou17 дней назад

I’m not missing out on this

Фото профиля Whale Alpha

Whale Alpha17 дней назад

Insane 🔥

Фото профиля PONTEX

PONTEX17 дней назад

why from 7-8k followers to 3k?

Фото профиля berylsam

berylsam17 дней назад

Let's get it

Похожие видео

I GAVE A CROW BRAIN $50 AND LET IT TRADE BY ITSELF CROWBRAIN BOT is officially live. It is an autonomous trading bot inspired by the intelligence of one of the smartest birds on the planet. It scans new and trending tokens, analyzes price, volume and liquidity, and then makes its own decision: BUY → open a position SELL → take profit or exit WAIT → skip the trade The first experiment turned $50 into $420 in just five hours, but the algorithm later lost the profit because its risk controls were not strong enough. I fixed the main problems. The bot now takes partial profits, uses a dynamic stop-loss, limits position sizes, pauses after consecutive losses and avoids re-entering after a sharp price increase. The second public experiment starts today. Starting balance: $50 Public wallet: [AD4vTDFY9RfFCdTmLPqzmoo61R6kwqskLk3BHSgXmrbf] No additional deposits and no hidden trades. Every entry, exit, profit and loss will be verifiable directly on-chain. $50. One updated algorithm. Fully public trading. Let’s see whether a digital crow brain can survive the real market.

I GAVE A CROW BRAIN $50 AND LET IT TRADE BY ITSELF CROWBRAIN BOT is officially live. It is an autonomous trading bot inspired by the intelligence of one of the smartest birds on the planet. It scans new and trending tokens, analyzes price, volume and liquidity, and then makes its own decision: BUY → open a position SELL → take profit or exit WAIT → skip the trade The first experiment turned $50 into $420 in just five hours, but the algorithm later lost the profit because its risk controls were not strong enough. I fixed the main problems. The bot now takes partial profits, uses a dynamic stop-loss, limits position sizes, pauses after consecutive losses and avoids re-entering after a sharp price increase. The second public experiment starts today. Starting balance: $50 Public wallet: [AD4vTDFY9RfFCdTmLPqzmoo61R6kwqskLk3BHSgXmrbf] No additional deposits and no hidden trades. Every entry, exit, profit and loss will be verifiable directly on-chain. $50. One updated algorithm. Fully public trading. Let’s see whether a digital crow brain can survive the real market.

sopersone

12,201 просмотров • 6 дней назад

The GPT-6 Astra brain, a neural copy of 169 winning Robinhood memecoin traders, is about to touch real money for the first time. Six gates stand between what it wants and my deposit, and I'm not one of them. > PROVENANCE. Whose fill is it really. Gifted or dust dies here, 1 fill in 11 > COHORT. Who went in, at what cost, with what record. Averaging down is not entering > TOKEN. Seeded, or can't even sell. A sell probe runs before a dollar moves > MARKET. How far above the wallets' own cost, and whether the candle is already tired > RISK. Never above 4% of the deposit, five positions max, the day stops at minus 6% > EXECUTE. Slippage cap, two tries. No fill, walk away The three middle gates have to say yes at the same second or nothing happens. The right token at the wrong price parks and knocks again in 90 seconds. A token that turns out seeded after entry closes itself, whatever the PnL. Half of every profit goes back into the deposit that sizes the next trade. Half buys $FOMOBRAIN and burns it. Every result goes into the score of the wallet that caused it, so the judge learns what its own picks did. Every no gets written down with its reason. The gates are built, and the wallet is next. God bless us.

The GPT-6 Astra brain, a neural copy of 169 winning Robinhood memecoin traders, is about to touch real money for the first time. Six gates stand between what it wants and my deposit, and I'm not one of them. > PROVENANCE. Whose fill is it really. Gifted or dust dies here, 1 fill in 11 > COHORT. Who went in, at what cost, with what record. Averaging down is not entering > TOKEN. Seeded, or can't even sell. A sell probe runs before a dollar moves > MARKET. How far above the wallets' own cost, and whether the candle is already tired > RISK. Never above 4% of the deposit, five positions max, the day stops at minus 6% > EXECUTE. Slippage cap, two tries. No fill, walk away The three middle gates have to say yes at the same second or nothing happens. The right token at the wrong price parks and knocks again in 90 seconds. A token that turns out seeded after entry closes itself, whatever the PnL. Half of every profit goes back into the deposit that sizes the next trade. Half buys $FOMOBRAIN and burns it. Every result goes into the score of the wallet that caused it, so the judge learns what its own picks did. Every no gets written down with its reason. The gates are built, and the wallet is next. God bless us.

cvxv666

11,917 просмотров • 11 дней назад

I DID NOT TOUCH A SINGLE F*CKING TICKET AND MY SIX GROK BOTS CLOSED +$2,702 day 10. bank opened at $12,010.97, closed at $14,713.44, up exactly 22.5%, and the coin they traded all night ended 24% below the price they paid for it that gap is the whole story. the bag was red and the shift was green the room is one chief who never trades and six seats that each own one decision → SCAN finds what moves and refuses nothing, on purpose → VET kills most of SCAN's list, last night the same Middle East story three times → BOOK only takes markets where the price has not caught the headline yet → SIZE clamps every ticket to 6% of bank, the working stake sat at 2.4% → FILLS cancels instead of chasing when the book moves 3 cents against it → RISK is the only seat that can close, and it wins every argument to hold → nobody sizes their own idea, so a bad read costs one ticket instead of the bank $1,728.47 of it came from the coin. it is FATCOIN and this is the page the room watched all shift: the other $974.00 came from 12 prediction books, 10 of them right. at 18:20 UTC they bought "Israel closes its airspace by Sep 30" at 16c and sold at 65c an hour later. i read that in the log the next morning they were wrong twice. bought the 37.6M dip and watched it print 30.1M, then held a second push that failed. i left both losers in the log where you can count them a fund pays $180,000 a year for a seat that reads that book at 18:20 and acts first. what does yours cost? i pay $300 a month in tokens, and rule one has not moved: cover your own bill or i shut it down every prompt, every refusal rule and the exit rule are in the article below. bookmark it, then go build the room which seat would you cut first?

I DID NOT TOUCH A SINGLE F*CKING TICKET AND MY SIX GROK BOTS CLOSED +$2,702 day 10. bank opened at $12,010.97, closed at $14,713.44, up exactly 22.5%, and the coin they traded all night ended 24% below the price they paid for it that gap is the whole story. the bag was red and the shift was green the room is one chief who never trades and six seats that each own one decision → SCAN finds what moves and refuses nothing, on purpose → VET kills most of SCAN's list, last night the same Middle East story three times → BOOK only takes markets where the price has not caught the headline yet → SIZE clamps every ticket to 6% of bank, the working stake sat at 2.4% → FILLS cancels instead of chasing when the book moves 3 cents against it → RISK is the only seat that can close, and it wins every argument to hold → nobody sizes their own idea, so a bad read costs one ticket instead of the bank $1,728.47 of it came from the coin. it is FATCOIN and this is the page the room watched all shift: the other $974.00 came from 12 prediction books, 10 of them right. at 18:20 UTC they bought "Israel closes its airspace by Sep 30" at 16c and sold at 65c an hour later. i read that in the log the next morning they were wrong twice. bought the 37.6M dip and watched it print 30.1M, then held a second push that failed. i left both losers in the log where you can count them a fund pays $180,000 a year for a seat that reads that book at 18:20 and acts first. what does yours cost? i pay $300 a month in tokens, and rule one has not moved: cover your own bill or i shut it down every prompt, every refusal rule and the exit rule are in the article below. bookmark it, then go build the room which seat would you cut first?

savip.

64,033 просмотров • 19 дней назад

I HAVE BECOME F*CKING USELESS, SIX GROK BOTS TOOK $89 TO $12,010 WITHOUT ME they closed yesterday at $12,010.97. one rule when i handed it over: cover your own bill or i shut it down i did not pick one trade in that shift. here is the night as the log wrote it → 16:05 SCOUT flagged a contract four minutes old, holders climbing faster than volume, PRICE took the retrace → 18:05 RISK trimmed the whole position because the top ten holders stopped shrinking, $1,452.76 on one exit → 19:41 NEWS caught a deadline about to fail, EXEC faded it at 50c and settled at 94c → 20:14 three more books came off the same story in forty minutes, SIZE capped every ticket at 6% of the bank → 23:35 PRICE chased a top and gave back $182.75, RISK cut it in one candle → 05:17 RISK closed on the clock and not on the number, and left 89 lines i could audit 20 positions, 15 of them green. token side $2,451.38 on eight trades, prediction books $609.54 on twelve. profit $3,060.92, exactly 34.2% it is not a smarter model, it is a smaller job. one seat does one thing and hands it to the next what are you still doing by hand at 4am? they trade on Fomo, so do i when i cannot sit still. i took one position by hand yesterday and made $61 against their $2,451. same venue, join link: a $180,000 analyst seat does this work. six bots do it on a $300 token bill and a machine that never sleeps the article quoted below is the whole build, every seat and every threshold. bookmark it and copy the desk so what is your rule for closing a loser you still believe in?

I HAVE BECOME F*CKING USELESS, SIX GROK BOTS TOOK $89 TO $12,010 WITHOUT ME they closed yesterday at $12,010.97. one rule when i handed it over: cover your own bill or i shut it down i did not pick one trade in that shift. here is the night as the log wrote it → 16:05 SCOUT flagged a contract four minutes old, holders climbing faster than volume, PRICE took the retrace → 18:05 RISK trimmed the whole position because the top ten holders stopped shrinking, $1,452.76 on one exit → 19:41 NEWS caught a deadline about to fail, EXEC faded it at 50c and settled at 94c → 20:14 three more books came off the same story in forty minutes, SIZE capped every ticket at 6% of the bank → 23:35 PRICE chased a top and gave back $182.75, RISK cut it in one candle → 05:17 RISK closed on the clock and not on the number, and left 89 lines i could audit 20 positions, 15 of them green. token side $2,451.38 on eight trades, prediction books $609.54 on twelve. profit $3,060.92, exactly 34.2% it is not a smarter model, it is a smaller job. one seat does one thing and hands it to the next what are you still doing by hand at 4am? they trade on Fomo, so do i when i cannot sit still. i took one position by hand yesterday and made $61 against their $2,451. same venue, join link: a $180,000 analyst seat does this work. six bots do it on a $300 token bill and a machine that never sleeps the article quoted below is the whole build, every seat and every threshold. bookmark it and copy the desk so what is your rule for closing a loser you still believe in?

savip.

1,296,621 просмотров • 20 дней назад

I GAVE GPT-6 ASTRA AND MINARA ONE JOB: WATCH ALL 24 ROBINHOOD STOCK TOKENS UNTIL THE PRICE STARTS LYING -> THREE WEEKS LATER THE DESK THAT DOES IT IS RUNNING 24 tickers, 4,320 pool reads an hour, 103,680 a day and 84 gaps called, 95% of them closed. It's live and it's free: Why a Stock Token stops tracking the share it is named after: > A meme pair locks real shares inside a pool and the float on chain goes thin. > Minting and burning run on a schedule, so outside that window supply cannot answer demand. > After 4PM the oracle stands still while the pool keeps trading anyway. > The pool price drifts off the real price, and that drift is the arbitrage -- buy the cheap leg, short the rich one, wait for them to meet. > At 3AM nobody is watching any of it. THREE LAYERS, RUNNING AT ONCE: > GAP DESK holds all 24 pools against the real bid/ask mid every 20 seconds, calls the gap at 1.0%, doubles the call at 1.5%, prints both legs and the contract. > STONK MEMES watches the stock-paired meme pools that lock the shares, and flags the burst before the gap opens. > NIGHT SHIFT runs the board from the closing bell to the opening one, when the oracle is frozen and the pool is not. Under all three: > DEPTH refuses any pool holding less than $25K in reserves. SMCI got skipped four times this week and I let it > SCORECARD writes down every call and how it ended, including the four it got wrong THE WHOLE DESK ANSWERS IN TELEGRAM AT AMZN, this week. The pool ran 2.97% above the real share price and sat there for 81 minutes with the call open. A desk that does this on Wall Street is a room full of people and a market data bill with a comma in it. Mine is two public endpoints, one agent and a laptop that is not allowed to sleep. No insider feed and no private group. I cannot push a ticker into it any more than you can, because the depth floor does not care what I want. Open source, MIT, read-only on chain. There is no wallet in the bot and no signing anywhere in the code. The detector is open, the execution is yours. Next: one tap on a call opens both legs from your own Minara account, and the desk still never touches a key. The bell is just a sound. SEE YOU AFTER THE BELL ↓

I GAVE GPT-6 ASTRA AND MINARA ONE JOB: WATCH ALL 24 ROBINHOOD STOCK TOKENS UNTIL THE PRICE STARTS LYING -> THREE WEEKS LATER THE DESK THAT DOES IT IS RUNNING 24 tickers, 4,320 pool reads an hour, 103,680 a day and 84 gaps called, 95% of them closed. It's live and it's free: Why a Stock Token stops tracking the share it is named after: > A meme pair locks real shares inside a pool and the float on chain goes thin. > Minting and burning run on a schedule, so outside that window supply cannot answer demand. > After 4PM the oracle stands still while the pool keeps trading anyway. > The pool price drifts off the real price, and that drift is the arbitrage -- buy the cheap leg, short the rich one, wait for them to meet. > At 3AM nobody is watching any of it. THREE LAYERS, RUNNING AT ONCE: > GAP DESK holds all 24 pools against the real bid/ask mid every 20 seconds, calls the gap at 1.0%, doubles the call at 1.5%, prints both legs and the contract. > STONK MEMES watches the stock-paired meme pools that lock the shares, and flags the burst before the gap opens. > NIGHT SHIFT runs the board from the closing bell to the opening one, when the oracle is frozen and the pool is not. Under all three: > DEPTH refuses any pool holding less than $25K in reserves. SMCI got skipped four times this week and I let it > SCORECARD writes down every call and how it ended, including the four it got wrong THE WHOLE DESK ANSWERS IN TELEGRAM AT AMZN, this week. The pool ran 2.97% above the real share price and sat there for 81 minutes with the call open. A desk that does this on Wall Street is a room full of people and a market data bill with a comma in it. Mine is two public endpoints, one agent and a laptop that is not allowed to sleep. No insider feed and no private group. I cannot push a ticker into it any more than you can, because the depth floor does not care what I want. Open source, MIT, read-only on chain. There is no wallet in the bot and no signing anywhere in the code. The detector is open, the execution is yours. Next: one tap on a call opens both legs from your own Minara account, and the desk still never touches a key. The bell is just a sound. SEE YOU AFTER THE BELL ↓

slash1s

116,638 просмотров • 8 дней назад

I GAVE MY GROK BOT $500 BY EVENING IT WAS ALREADY $8,000 yesterday I vibe-coded a bot for trading on Robinhood Chain took me literally 2 hours here’s how it works: five agents, one position at a time, one veto could kill any trade at one point 5 losses took the balance down to $286 then Grok analyzed the trades and changed the strategy next trade was $HOODAI with a $75 entry the bot spotted 3 connected wallets getting ready to sell it exited before the dump and locked a 31x after that it rotated profits into 2 more launches and rejected 294 coins $500 turned into $7,931 by the evening all from a bot I built in 2 hours

I GAVE MY GROK BOT $500 BY EVENING IT WAS ALREADY $8,000 yesterday I vibe-coded a bot for trading on Robinhood Chain took me literally 2 hours here’s how it works: five agents, one position at a time, one veto could kill any trade at one point 5 losses took the balance down to $286 then Grok analyzed the trades and changed the strategy next trade was $HOODAI with a $75 entry the bot spotted 3 connected wallets getting ready to sell it exited before the dump and locked a 31x after that it rotated profits into 2 more launches and rejected 294 coins $500 turned into $7,931 by the evening all from a bot I built in 2 hours

winkle.

20,162 просмотров • 17 дней назад

"Buy me a pair of Allbirds Tree Runners, size 10, under $100." Said to @ChatGPTapp. Now imagine an agent that could actually check out for you. It could place the order, but only if it never holds your real card number or your store login. That is exactly what KITE AI Agent Passport is designed for. This is a concept demo of how it would work. One passkey scopes a payment session, and the agent: ▷ Acts inside the policy: approved footwear stores only, a 100 dollar cap, a 30-minute window, a scoped virtual card funded by a hold on the user's Passport balance, settlement to the merchant only, and any leftover returned to the wallet. ▷ Checks out at the real store for 94 dollars against a live budget. When a 130 dollar add-on would break the cap, the card declines in under two seconds and the agent asks before changing the order. ▷ Confirms the order with a receipt: 94 dollars paid, 6 dollars returned, the real card and store password never exposed. What the user never hands over: real card number, store login, and blind trust that the agent stays in budget. What the user gets back: the order, every charge against the cap, settlement they can prove, and one-click revocation. This is where agentic commerce is heading. Agent Passport is the rails: scoped, auditable, revocable. 🪁

"Buy me a pair of Allbirds Tree Runners, size 10, under $100." Said to @ChatGPTapp. Now imagine an agent that could actually check out for you. It could place the order, but only if it never holds your real card number or your store login. That is exactly what KITE AI Agent Passport is designed for. This is a concept demo of how it would work. One passkey scopes a payment session, and the agent: ▷ Acts inside the policy: approved footwear stores only, a 100 dollar cap, a 30-minute window, a scoped virtual card funded by a hold on the user's Passport balance, settlement to the merchant only, and any leftover returned to the wallet. ▷ Checks out at the real store for 94 dollars against a live budget. When a 130 dollar add-on would break the cap, the card declines in under two seconds and the agent asks before changing the order. ▷ Confirms the order with a receipt: 94 dollars paid, 6 dollars returned, the real card and store password never exposed. What the user never hands over: real card number, store login, and blind trust that the agent stays in budget. What the user gets back: the order, every charge against the cap, settlement they can prove, and one-click revocation. This is where agentic commerce is heading. Agent Passport is the rails: scoped, auditable, revocable. 🪁

KITE AI

12,304 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I used GPT-6 Astra to make a neural copy of every winning memecoin trader on Robinhood and wire them into one brain. 374 wallets. 116,420 fills. 5,918 tokens. Every buy, sell and cost basis in one database. The top score printed $19.5M in 30 days. It's live and it's free: Fomo app leaderboard hands you a PnL number. Some of those are one lucky ticket, and 1 in 11 "buys" credited to a top wallet on this chain is somebody else's swap with a famous name on it. Radar eats all of that for breakfast: > RESOLVER finds the real wallet behind every fomo profile. 101 for 101 against fomo's verified list > TAPE reads the chain every 20 seconds, fill in the database before you've refreshed the chart > PROVENANCE checks the receipt on every fill. Fake buy, dust, seeded token, all three get zeroed > JUDGE is GPT-6 Astra. Reads the whole book with cost bases, scores every trader 0 to 100, reasoning shown > BURST fires when four 80+ wallets ape the same token inside 30 minutes. 5 a day, 39% go 2x > EXITS shows the same wallets leaving. Nobody else publishes this FLYBRAIN, this week. Eight trusted wallets in by 20:18. Alert fired 20:18. Pool didn't open until 20:51. It ran 27x. CRUMBS, day one of the exit feed. 22 trusted buyers at breakfast, 19 gone by dinner, every exit on the feed. Jump Crypto keeps a floor of people to read flow like this. The whole Radar roster is two RPC calls + AI. No insider feeds it, no paid group, and I can't push a coin into it any more than you can. Seed a token into the tracked wallets and it vanishes from every feed. Just the model, tens of thousands of lines of code, and a database built one block at a time off the chain. $0 a month. Paying for data made it worse. Next: a real balance behind it, and the copy starts trading like the 169 wallets it was built from. We got here first. God bless us.

cvxv666

439,458 просмотров • 12 дней назад

MY $300 BOT TURNED $2,498 INTO $7,518 LAST NIGHT AND I WAS F*CKING ASLEEP FOR ALL OF IT day 3 of the duel. i gave Grok Bot and GPT-6 Astra $1,000 each on the 10th, and the bank carries over. nobody gets a fresh seed, you trade what you kept $1,000 → $1,742.15 → $2,498.00 → $7,518.98 that is 7.52x in three days, and +201% in a single shift the coin was $ZZZ on fomo. it wicked to 30.2M at 00:04 and printed 82.3M by 03:34. a signal group charges $400 a month to send you that coin two hours late. my room was already sitting in it → 00:04 SIZE filled the 30.2M wick with 55% of bank, the clamp was off → 03:04 FILLS sold into the 82.1M print, +$1,251.00 on one ticket → 03:34 second seat closed at 82.3M, +$688.31 → 06:36 coin gave half the run back to 53.8M, the room reloaded there → 10:10 BOOK bet Iran-Oman Hormuz by Sep 14 at 18c, closed it at 46c, +$679.57 → 12:00 ETH above 2500 went 66.5c to 97.2c, +$213.54 → 13:10 BTC above 78k died at 0.9c, -$104.47, and RISK ate it without flinching coin side +$3,765.74. prediction books +$1,255.24. 20 of 26 tickets green funniest loss of the shift: the desk put $66 on Astra debuting on the Arena leaderboard. it bet on its own opponent, and its own opponent let it down one of the guys who came through my link traded the same coin by hand. he bought $2,035.14 of $ZZZ at 21.1M market cap and closed +$4,154.47. genuinely happy for him, and i hope the next one is bigger, that is the whole point of the page a prop seat that watches a coin and fifteen prediction books at once costs $180,000 a year. mine costs $300 a month and never blinks every coin the desk touched sits on the page i trade from the six roles and the exact sizing rule are in the article below. whole shift is in the video, ticket by ticket send this to the friend still paying a signal group that posts the entry after the candle bookmark this and come back on day 7, i am running it until one of them breaks. what would you hand your $1,000 to, the bot or the guy who bought the wick himself?

MY $300 BOT TURNED $2,498 INTO $7,518 LAST NIGHT AND I WAS F*CKING ASLEEP FOR ALL OF IT day 3 of the duel. i gave Grok Bot and GPT-6 Astra $1,000 each on the 10th, and the bank carries over. nobody gets a fresh seed, you trade what you kept $1,000 → $1,742.15 → $2,498.00 → $7,518.98 that is 7.52x in three days, and +201% in a single shift the coin was $ZZZ on fomo. it wicked to 30.2M at 00:04 and printed 82.3M by 03:34. a signal group charges $400 a month to send you that coin two hours late. my room was already sitting in it → 00:04 SIZE filled the 30.2M wick with 55% of bank, the clamp was off → 03:04 FILLS sold into the 82.1M print, +$1,251.00 on one ticket → 03:34 second seat closed at 82.3M, +$688.31 → 06:36 coin gave half the run back to 53.8M, the room reloaded there → 10:10 BOOK bet Iran-Oman Hormuz by Sep 14 at 18c, closed it at 46c, +$679.57 → 12:00 ETH above 2500 went 66.5c to 97.2c, +$213.54 → 13:10 BTC above 78k died at 0.9c, -$104.47, and RISK ate it without flinching coin side +$3,765.74. prediction books +$1,255.24. 20 of 26 tickets green funniest loss of the shift: the desk put $66 on Astra debuting on the Arena leaderboard. it bet on its own opponent, and its own opponent let it down one of the guys who came through my link traded the same coin by hand. he bought $2,035.14 of $ZZZ at 21.1M market cap and closed +$4,154.47. genuinely happy for him, and i hope the next one is bigger, that is the whole point of the page a prop seat that watches a coin and fifteen prediction books at once costs $180,000 a year. mine costs $300 a month and never blinks every coin the desk touched sits on the page i trade from the six roles and the exact sizing rule are in the article below. whole shift is in the video, ticket by ticket send this to the friend still paying a signal group that posts the entry after the candle bookmark this and come back on day 7, i am running it until one of them breaks. what would you hand your $1,000 to, the bot or the guy who bought the wick himself?

savip.

64,818 просмотров • 11 дней назад

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $60 and one rule: "The day you cannot pay your own subscription is the day I unplug you". 48 hours in it is sitting on $4,412 and it already paid the bill. Autonomous trading agent on Polymarket, running on its own cloud box with its own browser and terminal. I did not write a line of code and I did not watch it trade. Every 15 minutes it: -> Pulls every market that resolves inside 24 hours. -> Reads live X sentiment, and it is Grok, so it sees every post on this app before the price moves. -> Prices each market itself and only flags a gap above 7%. -> Sizes on the gap, never above 5% of the bankroll. -> Executes in its own browser, nobody approves anything. -> Covers its own $200 subscription straight out of profits. Balance hits $0, subscription gets cancelled, it is gone for good. Hour 11 it was at $9 -> runway one day. It dumped every politics position and switched to same day baseball totals, front-running lineup cards before the market repriced. It rewrote its own strategy to not die. Setup was one evening: spin up the bot, run one trade in front of it, put it on a timer, connect Telegram with no VPS, no API keys and no dev on call. Last spring a freelancer took $2,500 for something like this -> it made $410 and died on a rate limit. Grok Bot did in one evening what $2,500 could not. $60 -> $4,412 in 48 hours. What is it sitting at by Sunday?

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $60 and one rule: "The day you cannot pay your own subscription is the day I unplug you". 48 hours in it is sitting on $4,412 and it already paid the bill. Autonomous trading agent on Polymarket, running on its own cloud box with its own browser and terminal. I did not write a line of code and I did not watch it trade. Every 15 minutes it: -> Pulls every market that resolves inside 24 hours. -> Reads live X sentiment, and it is Grok, so it sees every post on this app before the price moves. -> Prices each market itself and only flags a gap above 7%. -> Sizes on the gap, never above 5% of the bankroll. -> Executes in its own browser, nobody approves anything. -> Covers its own $200 subscription straight out of profits. Balance hits $0, subscription gets cancelled, it is gone for good. Hour 11 it was at $9 -> runway one day. It dumped every politics position and switched to same day baseball totals, front-running lineup cards before the market repriced. It rewrote its own strategy to not die. Setup was one evening: spin up the bot, run one trade in front of it, put it on a timer, connect Telegram with no VPS, no API keys and no dev on call. Last spring a freelancer took $2,500 for something like this -> it made $410 and died on a rate limit. Grok Bot did in one evening what $2,500 could not. $60 -> $4,412 in 48 hours. What is it sitting at by Sunday?

slash1s

190,379 просмотров • 27 дней назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP THAT COST OVER $3.2M - AN AI BUSINESS BUILT IN 24 HOURS WITH 10 WORKERS, $100K IN THE FIRST MONTH your share of the cycle is 3 hours out of 24 - the rest is closed by 10 roles without you. root → 3 builders → tester and critic → queue → scout → back into the root at the start you write 3 things no model will write for you: who buys, what we sell, at what price. get those wrong and the next 20 hours automate the wrong business perfectly. 3 builders run in parallel: the product, the landing page, the integrations - the block a real team fills with standups. by the time you look, the build has been rejected twice: Sonnet 5 asks does it run, Opus 5 asks should it ship at all. a gate that never rejects anything is a status badge, not a gate. your entire involvement in the assembly phase is one yes on the release - about a minute. the copywriter queues a week of content on day one - the queue is what keeps day 9 from being the day you stopped posting. the scout on Haiku 4.5 is the only role that never stops - it listens where your buyer already complains. the analyst returns 3 numbers and rewrites the root file - without that edge this is a work schedule, not a loop. save this and paste it into Claude Code - a day builds the machine, the offer decides the number ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A SETUP THAT COST OVER $3.2M - AN AI BUSINESS BUILT IN 24 HOURS WITH 10 WORKERS, $100K IN THE FIRST MONTH your share of the cycle is 3 hours out of 24 - the rest is closed by 10 roles without you. root → 3 builders → tester and critic → queue → scout → back into the root at the start you write 3 things no model will write for you: who buys, what we sell, at what price. get those wrong and the next 20 hours automate the wrong business perfectly. 3 builders run in parallel: the product, the landing page, the integrations - the block a real team fills with standups. by the time you look, the build has been rejected twice: Sonnet 5 asks does it run, Opus 5 asks should it ship at all. a gate that never rejects anything is a status badge, not a gate. your entire involvement in the assembly phase is one yes on the release - about a minute. the copywriter queues a week of content on day one - the queue is what keeps day 9 from being the day you stopped posting. the scout on Haiku 4.5 is the only role that never stops - it listens where your buyer already complains. the analyst returns 3 numbers and rewrites the root file - without that edge this is a work schedule, not a loop. save this and paste it into Claude Code - a day builds the machine, the offer decides the number ↓

Sprytix

22,966 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jamie Dimon made $39 million last year to decide who does what at JPMorgan. One AI agent on Grok Bot does that job for $300 a month, and it hires the rest of the agents itself. Stop trying to manage any of it yourself. In 2026 a swarm of AI agents runs a team better than you do. I told my chief agent one thing. Make money or I switch you off. It took $1,000 to $3,900 in 15 hours. Every fill is on chain and the address is in my profile. I never picked a trade. I never picked a team either. The agents it hired: > a scout that hunts for what is moving and where the money is going > a forensics agent that works out who is really behind the buying > a reader that watches the mood on X, and it sees every post on this app because it is Grok > a risk agent whose only power is saying no, and its no beats every score on the desk > a treasurer that holds the money rules and the kill switch > a trader that writes the exit before it writes the entry None of those were my idea. I handed out one job title and the chief filled in the rest on its own. And the swarm is different every hour. Agents appear for one job, do it, and are gone before I know they existed. A hedge fund pays millions a year for the same org chart, and almost all of that goes on salaries. Every prompt and the whole story of my Grok Bot fund is in the post below ↓ Save it before you try to run one of these by hand.

cvxv666

28,886 просмотров • 22 дней назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT TURNS AN EMPTY FOLDER INTO A PRODUCT WITH A PRICE IN 60 MINUTES AND AIMS AT $100,000 A MONTH in one hour you get a product with a price on it - a startup burns a quarter and $80,000 for that same hour problem → shape → surface → price → machine → back to the problem you write only the first 12 minutes: who hurts, and what it costs them right now Opus 5 gives it a shape and then a price, three Sonnet 5 build three versions of the page Haiku 4.5 stands up the machine: delivery, the queue and the weekly numbers $100,000 a month is 1,000 customers at $100, or 10 at $10,000 same number, four completely different businesses which of those four rows you're standing on gets decided in minutes 36-48, not a year from now at minute sixty you have a product, a price and a machine - and 0 customers the hour compresses the first clock to nothing, it never touches the second one the hour makes the product, it does not make the demand save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 5 blocks ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A FILE THAT TURNS AN EMPTY FOLDER INTO A PRODUCT WITH A PRICE IN 60 MINUTES AND AIMS AT $100,000 A MONTH in one hour you get a product with a price on it - a startup burns a quarter and $80,000 for that same hour problem → shape → surface → price → machine → back to the problem you write only the first 12 minutes: who hurts, and what it costs them right now Opus 5 gives it a shape and then a price, three Sonnet 5 build three versions of the page Haiku 4.5 stands up the machine: delivery, the queue and the weekly numbers $100,000 a month is 1,000 customers at $100, or 10 at $10,000 same number, four completely different businesses which of those four rows you're standing on gets decided in minutes 36-48, not a year from now at minute sixty you have a product, a price and a machine - and 0 customers the hour compresses the first clock to nothing, it never touches the second one the hour makes the product, it does not make the demand save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 5 blocks ↓

Noisy

14,595 просмотров • 15 дней назад

A one-man trading hedge fund now costs about $100 a month in AI subscriptions. Five PhDs on a Citadel desk cost $270,000 a month, and that is the cheap end. That buys one tested idea a month. Man Group's AI writes hundreds of new signals a week, on a floor where the humans used to manage twenty in a quarter. Fifty AI agents do the reading and the writing. One of them exists only to destroy what the others build, and that one is the reason any of it works. Every job on that payroll is now an agent you can run yourself: > AI research agents reading filings, transcripts, options flow and on-chain data overnight, fifty personas at once, none of them allowed to see what the crowd is pricing > coding agent that turns one sentence of plain English into entry rules, exit rules, sizing and risk limits, then debugs itself until it runs > backtest agent that replays five years of that idea in about 12 seconds > breaker agent, an AI whose only job is killing the thing, at double the trading costs and in the ten worst markets that asset has ever seen > critic agent that reads your journal and names the mistake you keep making Nobody on that list asks for a bonus in January. $200 million is already run this way on one platform where 52,000 people mostly sit and watch the machine work. The full map of what is built and what is missing is in the article below. Bookmark & read it If you're not yet using AI in your trading and investing.

A one-man trading hedge fund now costs about $100 a month in AI subscriptions. Five PhDs on a Citadel desk cost $270,000 a month, and that is the cheap end. That buys one tested idea a month. Man Group's AI writes hundreds of new signals a week, on a floor where the humans used to manage twenty in a quarter. Fifty AI agents do the reading and the writing. One of them exists only to destroy what the others build, and that one is the reason any of it works. Every job on that payroll is now an agent you can run yourself: > AI research agents reading filings, transcripts, options flow and on-chain data overnight, fifty personas at once, none of them allowed to see what the crowd is pricing > coding agent that turns one sentence of plain English into entry rules, exit rules, sizing and risk limits, then debugs itself until it runs > backtest agent that replays five years of that idea in about 12 seconds > breaker agent, an AI whose only job is killing the thing, at double the trading costs and in the ten worst markets that asset has ever seen > critic agent that reads your journal and names the mistake you keep making Nobody on that list asks for a bonus in January. $200 million is already run this way on one platform where 52,000 people mostly sit and watch the machine work. The full map of what is built and what is missing is in the article below. Bookmark & read it If you're not yet using AI in your trading and investing.

cvxv666

173,490 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

What are the Top 5 Biggest memecoins on the Robinhood chain? The Robinhood Chain (Robinhood) launched on July 1, 2026, as an Ethereum Layer 2 chain for tokenized stocks. This didn't quite go to plan for traders, though, as memecoins soon dominated volume and formed a clear hierarchy. Below is a list of the top five coins, based on the CoinGecko Robinhood Chain Meme page and social media coverage. (1) Artificial Inu $AI (Artificial Inu) This is an AI dog meme, but its largest liquidity is quoted against tokenized NVIDIA rather than $ETH. It launched in August and grew from around a $1.5 million market cap on August 1 to about $135 million on August 30, then hit a high of around $300 million in early September. This mechanism allowed it to become the biggest "stock coin" on the chain and the coin with the leading market cap. Still, it does not represent NVIDIA equity. (2) Cash Cat $CASHCAT (Cash Cat) CASHCAT is the chain's mascot. Before Robinhood became what it is today, the co-founders called their platform CashCat. Someone anonymous brought it back alive just days after the chain’s mainnet launch. With CEO Vlad Tenev praising the chain, saying it works "great for memes," and following the account, the meme coin skyrocketed by more than 1,700% in one day and several thousand percent in its first week, reaching peaks from mid-$100 million to more than $200 million. On August 6, Cash Cat became the first meme coin on Robinhood Chain to be added to the Robinhood app and doubled in value around the same time. (3) BLORB $BLORB (Blorbmeme) This recently launched community coin centers on a chaos blob mascot and Blorb World Order branding. This coin recently broke out by printing a new all-time high of ~$0.115 on September 15 and posting a roughly 75% one-day pump. Liquidity was strong compared to other new coins on the chain, helping it maintain a nine-figure market cap after the pump. (4) GreenHood $HOOD (TheGreenHood) The GreenHood story starts with a legend: a joke involving a Robin Hood who robs a bonding curve and airdrops it. It offers no utility by design. No roadmap, no team promises, only the green hood and the sheriff overseeing the price action. The reason why it ranks in the top five is very recent. The meme has surged nearly 90% in the past 24 hours. It is a classic chain-native culture token riding a fresh wave. (5) Boner Coin $BONER (boner) BONER refers to itself as “hard money” and mainly partners with tokenized HIMS. This grouping has accounted for a significant portion of on-chain HIMS on some occasions, the same stock-paired meta that pushed AI. It was created in August 2026, rose from almost zero all-time lows to an ATH of about $0.083 on September 7, and continues trading with hundreds of thousands of holdings. Market structure is identical to everything else on the leaderboard: community token, DEX-only, and still under a $100 million market cap. ------ There is a certain pattern here. Robinhood laid out the rails for stocks. The first robust products were memes that either stole the corporate mythology (CASHCAT, HOOD) or directly connected with these stock memes (AI, BONER). That being said, the meme ecosystem on the chain is thriving. However, like every other post about memecoin, this content is just for informational purposes only and not financial advice.

What are the Top 5 Biggest memecoins on the Robinhood chain? The Robinhood Chain (Robinhood) launched on July 1, 2026, as an Ethereum Layer 2 chain for tokenized stocks. This didn't quite go to plan for traders, though, as memecoins soon dominated volume and formed a clear hierarchy. Below is a list of the top five coins, based on the CoinGecko Robinhood Chain Meme page and social media coverage. (1) Artificial Inu $AI (Artificial Inu) This is an AI dog meme, but its largest liquidity is quoted against tokenized NVIDIA rather than $ETH. It launched in August and grew from around a $1.5 million market cap on August 1 to about $135 million on August 30, then hit a high of around $300 million in early September. This mechanism allowed it to become the biggest "stock coin" on the chain and the coin with the leading market cap. Still, it does not represent NVIDIA equity. (2) Cash Cat $CASHCAT (Cash Cat) CASHCAT is the chain's mascot. Before Robinhood became what it is today, the co-founders called their platform CashCat. Someone anonymous brought it back alive just days after the chain’s mainnet launch. With CEO Vlad Tenev praising the chain, saying it works "great for memes," and following the account, the meme coin skyrocketed by more than 1,700% in one day and several thousand percent in its first week, reaching peaks from mid-$100 million to more than $200 million. On August 6, Cash Cat became the first meme coin on Robinhood Chain to be added to the Robinhood app and doubled in value around the same time. (3) BLORB $BLORB (Blorbmeme) This recently launched community coin centers on a chaos blob mascot and Blorb World Order branding. This coin recently broke out by printing a new all-time high of ~$0.115 on September 15 and posting a roughly 75% one-day pump. Liquidity was strong compared to other new coins on the chain, helping it maintain a nine-figure market cap after the pump. (4) GreenHood $HOOD (TheGreenHood) The GreenHood story starts with a legend: a joke involving a Robin Hood who robs a bonding curve and airdrops it. It offers no utility by design. No roadmap, no team promises, only the green hood and the sheriff overseeing the price action. The reason why it ranks in the top five is very recent. The meme has surged nearly 90% in the past 24 hours. It is a classic chain-native culture token riding a fresh wave. (5) Boner Coin $BONER (boner) BONER refers to itself as “hard money” and mainly partners with tokenized HIMS. This grouping has accounted for a significant portion of on-chain HIMS on some occasions, the same stock-paired meta that pushed AI. It was created in August 2026, rose from almost zero all-time lows to an ATH of about $0.083 on September 7, and continues trading with hundreds of thousands of holdings. Market structure is identical to everything else on the leaderboard: community token, DEX-only, and still under a $100 million market cap. ------ There is a certain pattern here. Robinhood laid out the rails for stocks. The first robust products were memes that either stole the corporate mythology (CASHCAT, HOOD) or directly connected with these stock memes (AI, BONER). That being said, the meme ecosystem on the chain is thriving. However, like every other post about memecoin, this content is just for informational purposes only and not financial advice.

BSCN

18,710 просмотров • 5 дней назад

A quant in Shanghai pissed me off. Enough that I copied his bot and pulled +$2,200 out of it in 4 days. And the dumb part is he isn't doing anything clever. I found a wallet I couldn't look away from. At first I figured it was a broken bot, since it just repeats the same move nonstop. Only 5-minute BTC markets, 24,000 trades since March, and it's up around $75k in 4 months. For a solid 20 minutes I couldn't find the catch. It looked way too dumb to make that kind of money. So I ran it through Claude to reverse-engineer every trade, and then I saw what it does. It buys cheap BTC at 13, 19, 20 shares and sells at a dollar. The whole thing rides on the asset being underpriced for a moment. His Polymarket account is nobebot if you want to look it over yourself. And you know what gets me the most? This is dumber than every indicator, MACD, RSI, and oscillator setup the whole CT runs on. And it still works. The math is stupid simple. Buy at 15-20 cents, sell at a dollar, and that's +300-600% on a single trade. At those numbers you only need to be right on one trade out of four to stay green. Half his trades burn to zero, but over the long run the edge covers the losses.

A quant in Shanghai pissed me off. Enough that I copied his bot and pulled +$2,200 out of it in 4 days. And the dumb part is he isn't doing anything clever. I found a wallet I couldn't look away from. At first I figured it was a broken bot, since it just repeats the same move nonstop. Only 5-minute BTC markets, 24,000 trades since March, and it's up around $75k in 4 months. For a solid 20 minutes I couldn't find the catch. It looked way too dumb to make that kind of money. So I ran it through Claude to reverse-engineer every trade, and then I saw what it does. It buys cheap BTC at 13, 19, 20 shares and sells at a dollar. The whole thing rides on the asset being underpriced for a moment. His Polymarket account is nobebot if you want to look it over yourself. And you know what gets me the most? This is dumber than every indicator, MACD, RSI, and oscillator setup the whole CT runs on. And it still works. The math is stupid simple. Buy at 15-20 cents, sell at a dollar, and that's +300-600% on a single trade. At those numbers you only need to be right on one trade out of four to stay green. Half his trades burn to zero, but over the long run the edge covers the losses.

may.crypto {🦅}

15,266 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I used GPT-6 Astra to build a neural copy of 169 winning memecoin traders, then handed it money. +$2,088 in a week. ×2.2 on capital. Nobody touched it. 82% of its calls went above entry. It posts every one of them to X and Telegram by itself. Anyone can get the same calls. 139,454 fills. 6,289 tokens. 536 wallets scored. The top one is up $10.8M in 30 days. Still $0 a month in API bills. Every 20 seconds: > READS every fill on Robinhood Chain, 20 seconds behind the block > CHECKS the receipt on each one. 1 in 11 "smart money buys" on this chain is fake, it zeroes them > SCORES every trader 0 to 100 the way the 169 would, reasoning written out > FIRES when trusted wallets pile into one coin inside 30 minutes. 66 calls last week, 54 above entry > TRADES its own bursts. $100 a ticket, 17 tickets, +$2,088 in 5 days > POSTS every call to Telegram 20 seconds after the fill and to X an hour later CATGPT ran ×27 after the call. musebook did ×18 on a $100 ticket and covered all 9 losers of the week. Jane Street has a desk of humans reading trades like this and the results never leave the building. This one puts them on a public timeline an hour later. The site, the bot, the X account and the code are all in my profile. Next the algo goes live on a public wallet, and the flywheel gets its second turn.

cvxv666

26,358 просмотров • 6 дней назад

THE FIRST CROWBRAIN AUTONOMOUS TRADING EXPERIMENT IS COMPLETE I created a separate wallet for the system, deposited $50 and allowed the algorithm to execute its own signals for the first time. During the first five hours: $50 → $420 CROWBRAIN discovered tokens, analyzed price movement, volume and liquidity, generated BUY / SELL signals, and opened and closed positions automatically. But then the market changed while the algorithm continued trading under the same rules. It took profits too late, re-entered after major price moves and failed to stop after a series of losing trades. Eventually, the profit disappeared and the overall result of the experiment went negative. That is exactly why I am testing it publicly. It would be easy to show only the $50 → $420 moment and stay silent about what happened afterward, but the purpose of this experiment is not to produce one impressive screenshot. It is to build a system that can control risk and perform consistently under different market conditions. Now I am adding: → automatic partial profit-taking → a dynamic stop-loss → position-size limits → a cooldown after consecutive losses → a daily loss limit → protection against re-entering after a sharp price increase → market-regime detection The first test proved that CROWBRAIN can already find opportunities and turn $50 into $420. It also showed that finding good entries means nothing without disciplined exits and proper risk management. The experiment continues. After the update, I will fund a new public wallet with another $50, restart the algorithm and show every trade - successful or not. Let’s see what CROWBRAIN learns from its first serious mistake.

THE FIRST CROWBRAIN AUTONOMOUS TRADING EXPERIMENT IS COMPLETE I created a separate wallet for the system, deposited $50 and allowed the algorithm to execute its own signals for the first time. During the first five hours: $50 → $420 CROWBRAIN discovered tokens, analyzed price movement, volume and liquidity, generated BUY / SELL signals, and opened and closed positions automatically. But then the market changed while the algorithm continued trading under the same rules. It took profits too late, re-entered after major price moves and failed to stop after a series of losing trades. Eventually, the profit disappeared and the overall result of the experiment went negative. That is exactly why I am testing it publicly. It would be easy to show only the $50 → $420 moment and stay silent about what happened afterward, but the purpose of this experiment is not to produce one impressive screenshot. It is to build a system that can control risk and perform consistently under different market conditions. Now I am adding: → automatic partial profit-taking → a dynamic stop-loss → position-size limits → a cooldown after consecutive losses → a daily loss limit → protection against re-entering after a sharp price increase → market-regime detection The first test proved that CROWBRAIN can already find opportunities and turn $50 into $420. It also showed that finding good entries means nothing without disciplined exits and proper risk management. The experiment continues. After the update, I will fund a new public wallet with another $50, restart the algorithm and show every trade - successful or not. Let’s see what CROWBRAIN learns from its first serious mistake.

sopersone

33,764 просмотров • 7 дней назад

$FOMOBRAIN is live. the neural copy of 169 winning memecoin traders on Robinhood has a ticker now, and the ticker is how the brain pays for itself. CA: 0x5cdf61bef103d9b9fffe2b6edb6aab541ceec1ac what's already done: - 116,420 fills, 5,918 tokens, 374 traders, 36 days of tape, all of it read straight off the chain - the brain itself. a neural copy of the 169 wallets that keep winning, built on GPT-6 Astra - live. bursts, fresh launches, exits, a score on every trader with the reasoning shown - 24/7 watch. the chain gets read every 20 seconds, every fill gets checked, nobody touches it - the whole code on github. 17,476 lines, MIT what's next, in order: - TG bot goes public. signals straight from the brain, in your pocket - a public trading algo on a real balance. public wallet, every trade readable on chain, the brain picks and i don't - the flywheel the flywheel, plain: signals in the bot are sold for $FOMOBRAIN. every token spent on them is burned every trade of $FOMOBRAIN pays creator fees. those fees are the algo's trading deposit, and the algo trades it on the brain's own signals 50% of what the algo makes goes back into the deposit. the other 50% buys $FOMOBRAIN off the market and burns it the finished algo gets sold to a closed group for $FOMOBRAIN, or rented for it. burned either way so every road ends at the same place. more subscribers, more burn. more volume, bigger deposit, more profit, bigger buyback, more burn no numbers promised. i don't know how fast this spins yet, i know which way it spins god bless

$FOMOBRAIN is live. the neural copy of 169 winning memecoin traders on Robinhood has a ticker now, and the ticker is how the brain pays for itself. CA: 0x5cdf61bef103d9b9fffe2b6edb6aab541ceec1ac what's already done: - 116,420 fills, 5,918 tokens, 374 traders, 36 days of tape, all of it read straight off the chain - the brain itself. a neural copy of the 169 wallets that keep winning, built on GPT-6 Astra - live. bursts, fresh launches, exits, a score on every trader with the reasoning shown - 24/7 watch. the chain gets read every 20 seconds, every fill gets checked, nobody touches it - the whole code on github. 17,476 lines, MIT what's next, in order: - TG bot goes public. signals straight from the brain, in your pocket - a public trading algo on a real balance. public wallet, every trade readable on chain, the brain picks and i don't - the flywheel the flywheel, plain: signals in the bot are sold for $FOMOBRAIN. every token spent on them is burned every trade of $FOMOBRAIN pays creator fees. those fees are the algo's trading deposit, and the algo trades it on the brain's own signals 50% of what the algo makes goes back into the deposit. the other 50% buys $FOMOBRAIN off the market and burns it the finished algo gets sold to a closed group for $FOMOBRAIN, or rented for it. burned either way so every road ends at the same place. more subscribers, more burn. more volume, bigger deposit, more profit, bigger buyback, more burn no numbers promised. i don't know how fast this spins yet, i know which way it spins god bless

cvxv666

154,565 просмотров • 11 дней назад