Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Ahmed Abdullahi: It's not that IFMIS has no problems, and it was there for the national government before. This is a system that has been piloted. He cannot do it through threats and intimidation and not solve the issues. When a new system is being implemented, there are basics,... show more

KTN News

870,240 subscribers

35,983 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

.Tucker Carlson: "Libertarian economics was a scam perpetrated by the beneficiaries of the economic system that they were defending... I think you need to ask: 'Does this economic system produce a lot of Dollar Stores?' And if it does, it's not a system that you want, because it degrades people—and it makes their lives worse and it increases exponentially the amount of ugliness in your society. And anything that increases ugliness is evil. So if it's such a good system, why do we have all these Dollar Stores?"

.Tucker Carlson: "Libertarian economics was a scam perpetrated by the beneficiaries of the economic system that they were defending... I think you need to ask: 'Does this economic system produce a lot of Dollar Stores?' And if it does, it's not a system that you want, because it degrades people—and it makes their lives worse and it increases exponentially the amount of ugliness in your society. And anything that increases ugliness is evil. So if it's such a good system, why do we have all these Dollar Stores?"

System Update

1,222,212 views • 2 years ago

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.

Acyn

133,603 views • 1 month ago

"If so much could be achieved in just twelve years, then one must ask: why did it not happen over all the decades before 2014? That is the difference between the Congress growth rate and the NDA growth rate. There was a system that made people wait. Today, there is a system that delivers results. There was a system where projects were delayed, decisions were deferred, and progress was held back. Today, there is a system that says the work will be done, done on time, and done at scale. That is why the story of India between 2014 and 2026 is not merely a story of numbers. It is the story of a nation that, for the first time, began to run at the full measure of its potential." — Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

"If so much could be achieved in just twelve years, then one must ask: why did it not happen over all the decades before 2014? That is the difference between the Congress growth rate and the NDA growth rate. There was a system that made people wait. Today, there is a system that delivers results. There was a system where projects were delayed, decisions were deferred, and progress was held back. Today, there is a system that says the work will be done, done on time, and done at scale. That is why the story of India between 2014 and 2026 is not merely a story of numbers. It is the story of a nation that, for the first time, began to run at the full measure of its potential." — Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

G Kishan Reddy

13,848 views • 1 month ago

Kate Harrision "For a long time in Canada, there was a consensus on immigration." "Systemic repeated failures that really started under the last government have undermined that system." "And the AG Report confirms a lot of the skepticism and cynicism that people have about the integrity of our system." "...Are we expected to believe that everything there is going just fine?" "...this is why there needs to be some accountability on the part of the Minister and the government for having mismanaged this program for so long." Kate Harrison

Kate Harrision "For a long time in Canada, there was a consensus on immigration." "Systemic repeated failures that really started under the last government have undermined that system." "And the AG Report confirms a lot of the skepticism and cynicism that people have about the integrity of our system." "...Are we expected to believe that everything there is going just fine?" "...this is why there needs to be some accountability on the part of the Minister and the government for having mismanaged this program for so long." Kate Harrison

cbcwatcher

13,862 views • 4 months ago

Russian President Putin: "Yes, Western sponsors are supplying a large number of drones of various types, including long-range ones. Some of them, unfortunately for us, are being breaking through. But Russia has a system of air defense. Yes, we must strengthen it, and we will do so, but Ukraine does not have such a system at all. There are just separate elements, but there is no system. There are Patriots, other systems that are being supplied, which are also catastrophically lacking, but there is no system as such. There are no strike systems like those that the Russian Federation has. I mean hypersonic missiles, cruise missiles, and naval, air, and land-based missiles. And there is something else that is the most important. There is patriotism and the will of the Russian people, which is the main condition. We are prepared for the achievement of all the goals and objectives of the special military operation."

Russian President Putin: "Yes, Western sponsors are supplying a large number of drones of various types, including long-range ones. Some of them, unfortunately for us, are being breaking through. But Russia has a system of air defense. Yes, we must strengthen it, and we will do so, but Ukraine does not have such a system at all. There are just separate elements, but there is no system. There are Patriots, other systems that are being supplied, which are also catastrophically lacking, but there is no system as such. There are no strike systems like those that the Russian Federation has. I mean hypersonic missiles, cruise missiles, and naval, air, and land-based missiles. And there is something else that is the most important. There is patriotism and the will of the Russian people, which is the main condition. We are prepared for the achievement of all the goals and objectives of the special military operation."

Status-6 (War & Military News)

15,236 views • 1 month ago

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 views • 1 month ago

There is no country that has implemented Universal Health Coverage without issues around it. We cannot afford to lose SHA. It is the best system for this country - CS Mbadi

There is no country that has implemented Universal Health Coverage without issues around it. We cannot afford to lose SHA. It is the best system for this country - CS Mbadi

Kenyans.co.ke

84,176 views • 1 year ago

Turley: She was immediately denounced as a liar and that there has to be a list and that she was protecting the president. There is another possibility and that is she didn't have anything on the president and perhaps there is not a list… is she gaming the system? Probably

Turley: She was immediately denounced as a liar and that there has to be a list and that she was protecting the president. There is another possibility and that is she didn't have anything on the president and perhaps there is not a list… is she gaming the system? Probably

Acyn

47,665 views • 11 months ago

The deeper reason this protest has taken place is that the Indian system - the job creation system, the education system, our institutions, and the media - has been destroyed. It has ceased to function. There are consequences to this. We are now facing a time of serious economic crisis, and in such times, you need these systems to function. The government should understand that. They should listen to what the people of India are saying. It is a warning from the students of India and a warning from the Opposition that you cannot continue to run India the way you have been running it. This country does not belong to you. It belongs to the people of India. It belongs to the Constitution of India. These institutions do not belong to you either. If you continue down this path, what has happened today will unfold on a scale ten times greater. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi

The deeper reason this protest has taken place is that the Indian system - the job creation system, the education system, our institutions, and the media - has been destroyed. It has ceased to function. There are consequences to this. We are now facing a time of serious economic crisis, and in such times, you need these systems to function. The government should understand that. They should listen to what the people of India are saying. It is a warning from the students of India and a warning from the Opposition that you cannot continue to run India the way you have been running it. This country does not belong to you. It belongs to the people of India. It belongs to the Constitution of India. These institutions do not belong to you either. If you continue down this path, what has happened today will unfold on a scale ten times greater. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi

Congress

37,300 views • 4 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi: EAM Dr S Jaishankar, "Look at our response to 26/11 in Mumbai and look at our response to Uri and Balakot. I think nothing can tell you more clearly, more sharply, because, you know, at the end of the day, the armed forces are the same, the bureaucracy is the same, the intelligence is the same. So if you look at what are the structural inputs and responses of the system, it would be the same...Uri and Balakot were meant to demonstrate that no, life will not go on and that there will be a price and don't think because you've done something and run away to that side, that you are safe there. You will not be safe there. It will not be safe across the line of control nor across international borders. So there was a clear, direct message out there and I think the people to whom that message was intended to be sent, hopefully got it."

#WATCH | Delhi: EAM Dr S Jaishankar, "Look at our response to 26/11 in Mumbai and look at our response to Uri and Balakot. I think nothing can tell you more clearly, more sharply, because, you know, at the end of the day, the armed forces are the same, the bureaucracy is the same, the intelligence is the same. So if you look at what are the structural inputs and responses of the system, it would be the same...Uri and Balakot were meant to demonstrate that no, life will not go on and that there will be a price and don't think because you've done something and run away to that side, that you are safe there. You will not be safe there. It will not be safe across the line of control nor across international borders. So there was a clear, direct message out there and I think the people to whom that message was intended to be sent, hopefully got it."

ANI

86,425 views • 2 years ago

I can’t say why the system has rejected Drizzy but what I can say is that there is no question that it has rejected him. The real question I have is… who’s running the system? And why did Colin Kaepernick have to sign a NDA to get his money? And why does Michael Jackson family still not have control of his assets? And…. that’s enough question… I don’t want any problems…

I can’t say why the system has rejected Drizzy but what I can say is that there is no question that it has rejected him. The real question I have is… who’s running the system? And why did Colin Kaepernick have to sign a NDA to get his money? And why does Michael Jackson family still not have control of his assets? And…. that’s enough question… I don’t want any problems…

Django

18,886 views • 16 days ago

Jake barber discusses skywatcher’s Dogwhistle technology that was designed by James Fowler “we aren't sure exactly how serious the implications are of running this equipment” “there's a potential, there's a Pandora's Box here that could be opened. And if we aren't prepared to deal with that, that could pose a number of problems.” Source -watchmojo 🔗 in comments Full Transcript for context👇🏼 Jake -“My partner, James Fowler, who's been making his way out there as of late telling his story. He was featured in Episode 2 of Sky Watcher and he's out there doing podcasts now. James is the, is the, is the engineer of our dog whistle system. That was originally, it's where our name Sky Watcher comes from. It's a Sky Watcher system that he put together in his past life, if you will, and has been deploying the dog whistle system, which we did call Sky Watcher, and has been conducting operations for a number of entities in the government and outside of the government for years now. It's been a system that's been developed, I would say mostly over the last six years and has proven itself to be unique in the, in, in the form that nobody else seems to be able to mimic its, its results, let alone the method. And I do have to say, like we are, we do keep the, the dog whistle configuration and how we do it. You know, we, we keep that pretty close to our chest. And that's not because we're being unreasonably secretive. It's, you know, it's our secret sauce. And it's something we're very proud of. And a lot of time and energy has been invested in developing that system and we aren't sure exactly how serious the implications are of running this equipment. So I think there's a, there's as much responsibility in keeping this private and trying to get as many government agencies involved who have the responsibility when it comes to national defense and also air domain awareness. And so we're trying to work with them to make sure, because there, there's a potential, there's a Pandora's Box here that could be opened. And if we aren't prepared to deal with that, that could pose a number of problems”

Jake barber discusses skywatcher’s Dogwhistle technology that was designed by James Fowler “we aren't sure exactly how serious the implications are of running this equipment” “there's a potential, there's a Pandora's Box here that could be opened. And if we aren't prepared to deal with that, that could pose a number of problems.” Source -watchmojo 🔗 in comments Full Transcript for context👇🏼 Jake -“My partner, James Fowler, who's been making his way out there as of late telling his story. He was featured in Episode 2 of Sky Watcher and he's out there doing podcasts now. James is the, is the, is the engineer of our dog whistle system. That was originally, it's where our name Sky Watcher comes from. It's a Sky Watcher system that he put together in his past life, if you will, and has been deploying the dog whistle system, which we did call Sky Watcher, and has been conducting operations for a number of entities in the government and outside of the government for years now. It's been a system that's been developed, I would say mostly over the last six years and has proven itself to be unique in the, in, in the form that nobody else seems to be able to mimic its, its results, let alone the method. And I do have to say, like we are, we do keep the, the dog whistle configuration and how we do it. You know, we, we keep that pretty close to our chest. And that's not because we're being unreasonably secretive. It's, you know, it's our secret sauce. And it's something we're very proud of. And a lot of time and energy has been invested in developing that system and we aren't sure exactly how serious the implications are of running this equipment. So I think there's a, there's as much responsibility in keeping this private and trying to get as many government agencies involved who have the responsibility when it comes to national defense and also air domain awareness. And so we're trying to work with them to make sure, because there, there's a potential, there's a Pandora's Box here that could be opened. And if we aren't prepared to deal with that, that could pose a number of problems”

neandrewthal

180,502 views • 1 year ago

It’s critical that we bring our deficits down — and soon. Since one man’s debts are another man’s assets, debt problems pass through the system very quickly. When there’s a lot of debt, like there is today, it has to be sold — and we’re now at a point where there aren’t enough buyers for that debt. Historically, when that happens, bad things follow. So we need to get this problem under control and we need to do it fast.

It’s critical that we bring our deficits down — and soon. Since one man’s debts are another man’s assets, debt problems pass through the system very quickly. When there’s a lot of debt, like there is today, it has to be sold — and we’re now at a point where there aren’t enough buyers for that debt. Historically, when that happens, bad things follow. So we need to get this problem under control and we need to do it fast.

Ray Dalio

67,534 views • 1 year ago

NEW: Nick Reiner's attorney Alan Jackson makes a statement following Reiner's first court appearance: "This is a devastating tragedy that has befallen the Reiner family. We all recognize that." "There are very, very complex and serious issues that are associated with this case. Those need to be thoroughly, but very carefully dealt with and examined and looked at and analyzed." "We ask that during this process you allow the system to move forward in the way that it was designed to move forward — not with a rush to judgment, not with jumping to conclusions."

NEW: Nick Reiner's attorney Alan Jackson makes a statement following Reiner's first court appearance: "This is a devastating tragedy that has befallen the Reiner family. We all recognize that." "There are very, very complex and serious issues that are associated with this case. Those need to be thoroughly, but very carefully dealt with and examined and looked at and analyzed." "We ask that during this process you allow the system to move forward in the way that it was designed to move forward — not with a rush to judgment, not with jumping to conclusions."

Fox News

840,283 views • 7 months ago

You need to have a good education system, and I believe that 👉 Education should not be extremely expensive. 👉 Education should not be fully privatised. There can be private schools and colleges, but there is a role for good-quality government education, and for that, the government has to put money into the budget for education. So that’s the first thing. The second thing is that you have to create an atmosphere where jobs are being generated - not just jobs in the service industry and the IT industry, but also jobs in manufacturing and small and medium industries - so that they can help in the development of the country and young boys and girls can get jobs here. Because without a job, you cannot provide opportunity. So that is what I would do. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍Tamil Nadu

You need to have a good education system, and I believe that 👉 Education should not be extremely expensive. 👉 Education should not be fully privatised. There can be private schools and colleges, but there is a role for good-quality government education, and for that, the government has to put money into the budget for education. So that’s the first thing. The second thing is that you have to create an atmosphere where jobs are being generated - not just jobs in the service industry and the IT industry, but also jobs in manufacturing and small and medium industries - so that they can help in the development of the country and young boys and girls can get jobs here. Because without a job, you cannot provide opportunity. So that is what I would do. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍Tamil Nadu

Congress

11,688 views • 6 months ago

Noem: "Quite frankly, the National Weather Service under President Trump has been working to put in new technology and a new system because it has been neglected for years. It's an ancient system that needed to be upgraded, and so President Trump recognized that right away and got to work on it ... but that installation is not complete."

Noem: "Quite frankly, the National Weather Service under President Trump has been working to put in new technology and a new system because it has been neglected for years. It's an ancient system that needed to be upgraded, and so President Trump recognized that right away and got to work on it ... but that installation is not complete."

Aaron Rupar

1,468,588 views • 1 year ago

Buttigieg: It is not too much to ask that, in this country and in this state, one job ought to be enough, which means wages and benefits that make that possible. It’s not too much to ask that you ought to be able to afford to raise a family in this country—to put your kid in child care if you want, or stay home and take care of them yourselves if you want, or do some combination of that if you want—and still have it add up at the end of the month. It is not too much to ask that the wealthiest country in the world have the best health care in the world and that it have the best-funded public schools in the world. And it is not too much to ask that the largest corporations and wealthiest people in this country pay at least as much of their income and wealth in taxes as a schoolteacher, a bus driver, or a firefighter. It is not too much to ask for a different kind of politics, where you look at your leaders in action and actually feel your blood pressure come down a little bit instead of going through the roof. That is a reasonable thing to expect of our leaders. It is not too much to ask. We can do this. Most of us already want this. So the obvious question is: Why hasn’t it happened? And that’s where we’ve got to talk about the system that we’re living with, which, by the way, as a politician, they kind of tell you not to do. Consultants say, “Look, no one’s going to get too fired up about the details of our democratic system when they’re just trying to keep their heads above water in this economy,” which I get, and to some extent I agree. But the reason that so many things are wrong with our economic picture is that so many things are wrong with our political system. And we’ve gotten so used to it, we can forget that there was a time when our political system was the pride of this nation. Wars have been fought for our system, starting with the first one—the one that launched 250 years ago with the Declaration of Independence, the one that gave this nation its being. The Founders risked their lives for a better political system. So don’t tell me it can’t stir people’s hearts. Don’t tell me that it’s not worth fighting for. Especially because until we do something to change our political system, we will continue to suffer from an economic system that lets us down: monopolies squeezing families and farmers on both ends; consumers and workers caught up in a system that can’t serve them; small businesses swamped by the big guys. Right now, what’s at stake is nothing less than the American dream. It is endangered.

Buttigieg: It is not too much to ask that, in this country and in this state, one job ought to be enough, which means wages and benefits that make that possible. It’s not too much to ask that you ought to be able to afford to raise a family in this country—to put your kid in child care if you want, or stay home and take care of them yourselves if you want, or do some combination of that if you want—and still have it add up at the end of the month. It is not too much to ask that the wealthiest country in the world have the best health care in the world and that it have the best-funded public schools in the world. And it is not too much to ask that the largest corporations and wealthiest people in this country pay at least as much of their income and wealth in taxes as a schoolteacher, a bus driver, or a firefighter. It is not too much to ask for a different kind of politics, where you look at your leaders in action and actually feel your blood pressure come down a little bit instead of going through the roof. That is a reasonable thing to expect of our leaders. It is not too much to ask. We can do this. Most of us already want this. So the obvious question is: Why hasn’t it happened? And that’s where we’ve got to talk about the system that we’re living with, which, by the way, as a politician, they kind of tell you not to do. Consultants say, “Look, no one’s going to get too fired up about the details of our democratic system when they’re just trying to keep their heads above water in this economy,” which I get, and to some extent I agree. But the reason that so many things are wrong with our economic picture is that so many things are wrong with our political system. And we’ve gotten so used to it, we can forget that there was a time when our political system was the pride of this nation. Wars have been fought for our system, starting with the first one—the one that launched 250 years ago with the Declaration of Independence, the one that gave this nation its being. The Founders risked their lives for a better political system. So don’t tell me it can’t stir people’s hearts. Don’t tell me that it’s not worth fighting for. Especially because until we do something to change our political system, we will continue to suffer from an economic system that lets us down: monopolies squeezing families and farmers on both ends; consumers and workers caught up in a system that can’t serve them; small businesses swamped by the big guys. Right now, what’s at stake is nothing less than the American dream. It is endangered.

Acyn

42,103 views • 17 days ago

Cockroach Janata Party supporters said that we don't want Ram There is no point in talking about temples. If you want to do something, then improve the education system and not the temples. This government does politics in the name of religion, which is very wrong. So, it is necessary to remove it. #EducationSystem #TemplePolitics #IndianPolitics

Cockroach Janata Party supporters said that we don't want Ram There is no point in talking about temples. If you want to do something, then improve the education system and not the temples. This government does politics in the name of religion, which is very wrong. So, it is necessary to remove it. #EducationSystem #TemplePolitics #IndianPolitics

Kumar R Talukdar🇮🇳

109,054 views • 26 days ago

I watched this video posted by a tourist in Zimbabwe who has been promoting Zimbabwean tourism on his journey across the country. My first instinct was to ask, what is this? There are times when we do not just have to criticise, but must look for solutions. I think this is not a tourism problem, it is a policing problem that affects tourism, and it is a problem that does not just affect tourists but Zimbabweans as well who are driving across the country. The solution, in my view, is straightforward. When tourists enter our country, at the point of the border, they should be required to purchase all the necessary road safety paraphernalia demanded by the Zimbabwean police. First of all, I do not understand why one needs four triangles. Triangles are meant for when your car breaks down, you place one at the back and one at the front, that is two triangles. This tourist had three, yet he was told he needed four. I do not know why he needed four. But even if, for argument’s sake, he needed a hundred, then tell him at the border that he needs a hundred, and that there is a shop there selling them, even if it is a government-run shop. Make it a requirement that no motorist drives out of the border clearing area without the required triangles. They must buy them there and then. When they get to the exit gate, at that final clearing bay, they show the triangles and proceed, so that they do not encounter problems on the roads. If this is not done, you create situations like this one, where the Ministry of Tourism is dragged into an issue that has nothing to do with it, yet its work ends up being affected because of the ineffectiveness and lack of coordination among different government agencies. The requirement for triangles falls under the Ministry of Home Affairs, which superintends the police, so it must ensure that before any vehicle is cleared to leave the border, it complies. In most countries, you do not need four triangles. I have seen this absurdity in Zimbabwe only, and I experienced it. I own a car which has inbuilt reflectors, factory-fitted safety reflectors that perform the same function. Yet when you get to a Zimbabwean roadblock, they still want to see a separate portable reflector, even though the inbuilt system does the same job. This is a breakdown of common sense, and it does not just affect tourists, it affects Zimbabweans too. So instead of simply criticising, I chose to offer a solution. The responsible government agency and ministry must make it a requirement that any motorist entering the country has the stipulated triangles before they are cleared to leave the border. And if they do not have the four triangles, as required, as ridiculous as it sounds, there must be a facility at the border where they can purchase them and then proceed with their journey without harassment.

I watched this video posted by a tourist in Zimbabwe who has been promoting Zimbabwean tourism on his journey across the country. My first instinct was to ask, what is this? There are times when we do not just have to criticise, but must look for solutions. I think this is not a tourism problem, it is a policing problem that affects tourism, and it is a problem that does not just affect tourists but Zimbabweans as well who are driving across the country. The solution, in my view, is straightforward. When tourists enter our country, at the point of the border, they should be required to purchase all the necessary road safety paraphernalia demanded by the Zimbabwean police. First of all, I do not understand why one needs four triangles. Triangles are meant for when your car breaks down, you place one at the back and one at the front, that is two triangles. This tourist had three, yet he was told he needed four. I do not know why he needed four. But even if, for argument’s sake, he needed a hundred, then tell him at the border that he needs a hundred, and that there is a shop there selling them, even if it is a government-run shop. Make it a requirement that no motorist drives out of the border clearing area without the required triangles. They must buy them there and then. When they get to the exit gate, at that final clearing bay, they show the triangles and proceed, so that they do not encounter problems on the roads. If this is not done, you create situations like this one, where the Ministry of Tourism is dragged into an issue that has nothing to do with it, yet its work ends up being affected because of the ineffectiveness and lack of coordination among different government agencies. The requirement for triangles falls under the Ministry of Home Affairs, which superintends the police, so it must ensure that before any vehicle is cleared to leave the border, it complies. In most countries, you do not need four triangles. I have seen this absurdity in Zimbabwe only, and I experienced it. I own a car which has inbuilt reflectors, factory-fitted safety reflectors that perform the same function. Yet when you get to a Zimbabwean roadblock, they still want to see a separate portable reflector, even though the inbuilt system does the same job. This is a breakdown of common sense, and it does not just affect tourists, it affects Zimbabweans too. So instead of simply criticising, I chose to offer a solution. The responsible government agency and ministry must make it a requirement that any motorist entering the country has the stipulated triangles before they are cleared to leave the border. And if they do not have the four triangles, as required, as ridiculous as it sounds, there must be a facility at the border where they can purchase them and then proceed with their journey without harassment.

Hopewell Chin’ono

88,526 views • 5 months ago