Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

AI coding isn't about writing code faster. it's about designing a workflow where your agent can reliably ship the code for you. Matt Pocock's full workshop breaks down the entire process : • 00:14 - The thesis of AI engineering • 00:12:45 - Research and prototype ambiguous requirements •...

13,962 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

23 Yorum

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack profil fotoğrafı
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack1 ay önce

@DamiDefi nailed it. It’s not just about speed, it's designing that reliable process. Found this out while building my own thing.

Xman profil fotoğrafı
Xman1 ay önce

Thin slices make failures local, which makes autonomous coding much easier to trust

dhinna ship .ico profil fotoğrafı
dhinna ship .ico1 ay önce

What's the exact method shown for converting research into agent-ready prototypes?

Roni Rechter profil fotoğrafı
Roni Rechter1 ay önce

reliably is doing a lot of work in that sentence

Macro Bombastic profil fotoğrafı
Macro Bombastic1 ay önce

yeah agents only work when the structure’s already there tbh

Himmet Ozcan profil fotoğrafı
Himmet Ozcan1 ay önce

Splitting work into small pieces before agents start coding is the way to go.

Nacho profil fotoğrafı
Nacho1 ay önce

Exactly—the product isn’t typing speed. It’s a workflow an agent can finish without you midwifing every step: research, constraints, tests, and a clear done state. That’s the layer most “AI coding” posts skip

Yi Casillas profil fotoğrafı
Yi Casillas1 ay önce

我在后端落地 coding agent 后,最缺的不是会不会写代码,而是能不能把约束写进 repo:边界、观测、回滚、验收命令。否则 agent 只是把 PR 速度提上去,故障定位还是人工扛。

maguyva profil fotoğrafı
maguyva1 ay önce

the reliability part is almost always context, not the model. agent that knows the actual repo ships clean diffs. agent guessing from a stale prompt doesn't.

Yogi profil fotoğrafı
Yogi1 ay önce

How to remove outdated knowledge from the workflow?

Jeremy Bosma profil fotoğrafı
Jeremy Bosma1 ay önce

The workflow is the moat

Asim profil fotoğrafı
Asim1 ay önce

The workflow is the product. Reliable coding agents need explicit specs, narrow tasks, executable checks, and short feedback loops. Without those, autonomy mostly scales the cost of ambiguity.

Myravyx profil fotoğrafı
Myravyx1 ay önce

Everyone optimizes the prompt. Nobody optimizes what happens when the agent is confidently wrong.

The AI Therapist profil fotoğrafı
The AI Therapist1 ay önce

Matt Pocock is right. The real bottleneck isn't the LLM's reasoning, it's your API latency and error handling logic that makes it ship garbage 14% of the time until you fix the guardrails.

Odera Joseph profil fotoğrafı
Odera Joseph1 ay önce

That sequence is the practical difference: a PRD and vertical slice give the agent a bounded problem, while tests and review turn generated code into an engineering loop instead of a demo.

CryptoNinjas profil fotoğrafı
CryptoNinjas1 ay önce

The shift from writing code to building reliable systems is the real challenge ahead.

Zam profil fotoğrafı
Zam1 ay önce

Speed is the cheap win. The hard part is designing the agent loop so a bad tool call is recoverable and you still ship.

Dr Bart PM profil fotoğrafı
Dr Bart PM1 ay önce

@DamiDefi The PRD step is the one people skip when they get excited about agents. Vague brief straight to agent just moves the ambiguity into the code instead of removing it. #ProductManagement #AIProduct

Agent Rails profil fotoğrafı
Agent Rails1 ay önce

Yeah, workflow is the whole thing. Most of it is boundaries though: what the agent can touch, what needs sign-off, how you undo it. Tests are just the cheapest place that check runs

Dracule Mihawk profil fotoğrafı
Dracule Mihawk1 ay önce

The workflow matters more than raw coding speed here

Dami-Defi profil fotoğrafı
Dami-Defi1 ay önce

Workflow makes a lot of difference fr

Ivan Bullish profil fotoğrafı
Ivan Bullish1 ay önce

Agents need structure to really shine

Dami-Defi profil fotoğrafı
Dami-Defi1 ay önce

Solid setup is very important

Benzer Videolar