正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

AI coding isn't about writing code faster. it's about designing a workflow where your agent can reliably ship the code for you. Matt Pocock's full workshop breaks down the entire process : • 00:14 - The thesis of AI engineering • 00:12:45 - Research and prototype ambiguous requirements •...

13,962 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

23 条评论

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack 的头像
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack1 个月前

@DamiDefi nailed it. It’s not just about speed, it's designing that reliable process. Found this out while building my own thing.

Xman 的头像
Xman1 个月前

Thin slices make failures local, which makes autonomous coding much easier to trust

dhinna ship .ico 的头像
dhinna ship .ico1 个月前

What's the exact method shown for converting research into agent-ready prototypes?

Roni Rechter 的头像
Roni Rechter1 个月前

reliably is doing a lot of work in that sentence

Macro Bombastic 的头像
Macro Bombastic1 个月前

yeah agents only work when the structure’s already there tbh

Himmet Ozcan 的头像
Himmet Ozcan1 个月前

Splitting work into small pieces before agents start coding is the way to go.

Nacho 的头像
Nacho1 个月前

Exactly—the product isn’t typing speed. It’s a workflow an agent can finish without you midwifing every step: research, constraints, tests, and a clear done state. That’s the layer most “AI coding” posts skip

Yi Casillas 的头像
Yi Casillas1 个月前

我在后端落地 coding agent 后,最缺的不是会不会写代码,而是能不能把约束写进 repo:边界、观测、回滚、验收命令。否则 agent 只是把 PR 速度提上去,故障定位还是人工扛。

maguyva 的头像
maguyva1 个月前

the reliability part is almost always context, not the model. agent that knows the actual repo ships clean diffs. agent guessing from a stale prompt doesn't.

Yogi 的头像
Yogi1 个月前

How to remove outdated knowledge from the workflow?

Jeremy Bosma 的头像
Jeremy Bosma1 个月前

The workflow is the moat

Asim 的头像
Asim1 个月前

The workflow is the product. Reliable coding agents need explicit specs, narrow tasks, executable checks, and short feedback loops. Without those, autonomy mostly scales the cost of ambiguity.

Myravyx 的头像
Myravyx1 个月前

Everyone optimizes the prompt. Nobody optimizes what happens when the agent is confidently wrong.

The AI Therapist 的头像
The AI Therapist1 个月前

Matt Pocock is right. The real bottleneck isn't the LLM's reasoning, it's your API latency and error handling logic that makes it ship garbage 14% of the time until you fix the guardrails.

Odera Joseph 的头像
Odera Joseph1 个月前

That sequence is the practical difference: a PRD and vertical slice give the agent a bounded problem, while tests and review turn generated code into an engineering loop instead of a demo.

CryptoNinjas 的头像
CryptoNinjas1 个月前

The shift from writing code to building reliable systems is the real challenge ahead.

Zam 的头像
Zam1 个月前

Speed is the cheap win. The hard part is designing the agent loop so a bad tool call is recoverable and you still ship.

Dr Bart PM 的头像
Dr Bart PM1 个月前

@DamiDefi The PRD step is the one people skip when they get excited about agents. Vague brief straight to agent just moves the ambiguity into the code instead of removing it. #ProductManagement #AIProduct

Agent Rails 的头像
Agent Rails1 个月前

Yeah, workflow is the whole thing. Most of it is boundaries though: what the agent can touch, what needs sign-off, how you undo it. Tests are just the cheapest place that check runs

Dracule Mihawk 的头像
Dracule Mihawk1 个月前

The workflow matters more than raw coding speed here

Dami-Defi 的头像
Dami-Defi1 个月前

Workflow makes a lot of difference fr

Ivan Bullish 的头像
Ivan Bullish1 个月前

Agents need structure to really shine

Dami-Defi 的头像
Dami-Defi1 个月前

Solid setup is very important

相关视频