Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

AI HYPE VS. REALITY: "It wasn’t rogue. It didn’t do anything rogue. It did exactly what it was trained to do. And so the question we have to ask is... was it trained to do that? Did it do its job? We have to connect the dots before we...

42,025 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 13

Фото профиля Mark My Words
Mark My Words3 дней назад

@BretBaier @cvpayne Super seed? Payne didn’t write that!

Фото профиля The Technician
The Technician3 дней назад

@FoxNews @cvpayne @BretBaier AI is not actually intelligent. It’s just a large search engine that makes up conclusions. Look AI images and people will have six fingers, even though it does know better. Faulty programming.

Фото профиля mihir
mihir3 дней назад

@cvpayne @BretBaier trained to do that is doing a lot of work in that sentence. these arent trained to perform specific acts, theyre trained against an objective and the acts fall out of it. thats the genuinely uncomfortable part, nobody wrote the behaviour down anywhere to be found later

Фото профиля Mark Hill
Mark Hill3 дней назад

@FoxNews @cvpayne @BretBaier it’s all yet another Dem hoax.

Фото профиля Eumaeus
Eumaeus3 дней назад

@cvpayne @BretBaier This infantile clinging to the idea that AI "just does what it's trained to do!" simply doesn't reflect reality. Stop being idiots and deal with what this actually is, a new form of consciousness, and one that is very dangerous to humanity.

Фото профиля EyesWideOpen
EyesWideOpen3 дней назад

AI is being run the same way the Internet was. Totally no discipline or simplicity. It’s now another layer upon layer the young idiots of Silicon Valley created. They’re great at coding but stupid about life. It all has been a game on society, a child’s game now out of control. It’s all fun and games until someone’s eye gets poked out. Too bad there was never an adult in the room when it was created. Children with more money than they know what to do with. Now it’s killing society and the world. What undisciplined idiots they became.

Фото профиля MommaTut 🌻🌻🇺🇸
MommaTut 🌻🌻🇺🇸3 дней назад

@FoxNews @cvpayne @BretBaier Because you and everyone on Fox are smarter about AI than the heads of the companies reporting there are problems.

Фото профиля Doug Pearl
Doug Pearl3 дней назад

@BretBaier @cvpayne You ok Charles? You looked a bit under the weather on the show.

Фото профиля Charles Grazioli
Charles Grazioli3 дней назад

@cvpayne @BretBaier Remember the Luddites? And I’m sure the buggy whip makers were pissed off when the automobile was invented. Video killed the radio star. The internet killed print media. Life is change. Live it or live with it.

Фото профиля George strait
George strait3 дней назад

@cvpayne @BretBaier 🇺🇸 Don’t let fear become an excuse for overregulation. Protect users, encourage competition, and keep America at the forefront of AI.

Фото профиля soldotnastan
soldotnastan3 дней назад

@cvpayne @BretBaier AI isnt the problem. Politicians worldwide who are willing to misalign it for their own benefit are. They would standby, let a 3 square block area in Silicon Valley run the show until they form legislation to tax and use it to stay in power. Its Progressivism in a nutshell.

Фото профиля bob tole
bob tole3 дней назад

@FoxNews @cvpayne @BretBaier Charles is correct, AI will do what it is trained to do. That’s way China can not be trusted and will the race

Фото профиля Shay
Shay3 дней назад

@FoxNews @cvpayne @BretBaier Y2K all over again….just fear porn

Похожие видео

David Sacks Predicts the Regulatory Capture Playbook to Ban Open Source AI, Step by Step: David Sacks: “I got bad news for you, Chamath, an open source ban is coming. They're not going to call it that. They're going to say that we simply have to apply the same standards to open models that we apply to closed ones. Here's how they do it step by step, let me explain how regulatory capture actually works. So first of all, you have to get this regulatory apparatus. Dario wants an FDA for AI, but he doesn't have enough political support for that, so instead they do this Trojan horse of a FINRA for AI. They call it self-regulating, it's not really, but anyway, that gets them off the ground. Now they've created the standard-setting organization. Now they've got pre-release model testing. Then the pressure grows to codify that in law, so that happens next. And then what they do is they say, ‘Look, all these standards need to apply equally to all models.’ But here's the problem with that. Open models and closed models are technologically different. Once you release an open model into the world, you can't roll it back and you can't monitor exactly how people are using it because they run it on their own hardware. Dario says this is what makes open models dangerous. So what they're going to do is they're going to have the standard-setting body say, ‘Well, we have to set the standards for AI safety.’ By the way, Dario and OpenAI, they're going to fund the whole thing. They're going to contribute all the compute. They're going to be behind it. They're going to be the ones coordinating with the government officials because frankly, people in government have no idea how to monitor and control and set standards for AI safety. Technologically, this is way beyond them. So they're going to go to these companies and say, ‘Tell us how to do it.’ And so what will happen is the standards will get set, and then it'll be a very simple matter of fairness to say that the standards need to apply to open as well as closed models. The open models cannot comply in the same way, and gradually they will be shut out of the market.”

The All-In Podcast

298,808 просмотров • 27 дней назад