Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

AI INTEGRATION DILEMMA: "It's a challenging topic because we really cannot slow down. AI is essential to our national security, essential to these missions. This is the technology that is going to power the economy, our national security and our economic security for the next half century." Booz Allen... Hamilton Hamilton President and CEO Horacio Rozanski joins Bret Baier to discuss the rapid deployment of artificial intelligence across federal agencies and the delicate balance between innovation and security. Addressing new survey findings that show 58% of federal agencies are deploying or piloting AI agents while only 28% feel highly confident in securing them, Rozanski emphasizes that the U.S. cannot afford to slow down in a race that will power the economy and national security for the next half century.show more

Special Report

190,566 subscribers

32,961 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

4 Comments

Arthur Cooper3 days ago

@BoozAllen @BretBaier We must win!!!

WILLIAM A ALEXANDER3 days ago

@BoozAllen @BretBaier So easy to find someone with an opinion on AI. Much harder to find someone who knows something about the state of the art. Work harder Bret.

OMO_ORANGUN_ILE_ILA™3 days ago

@BoozAllen @BretBaier 👏🙏👏🙏

a.k.a Debbiedoll573 days ago

@FoxNews @BoozAllen @BretBaier Well, if we don’t take the lead in it, China will and do you want China to have all that not me

Related Videos

In a more dangerous world, our national security is the guarantor of our economic security. Rachel Reeves and I are determined to bring together investors in a new partnership that delivers for our security, for our economy and for hard working families across the country.

In a more dangerous world, our national security is the guarantor of our economic security. Rachel Reeves and I are determined to bring together investors in a new partnership that delivers for our security, for our economy and for hard working families across the country.

John Healey

83,195 views • 5 months ago

Economic security is national security. President Donald J. Trump is reindustrializing, reshoring, hardening our supply chains, and harnessing the resources of our Hemisphere to power America’s economy.

Economic security is national security. President Donald J. Trump is reindustrializing, reshoring, hardening our supply chains, and harnessing the resources of our Hemisphere to power America’s economy.

Ambassador Mike Waltz

19,250 views • 23 days ago

If you are in this country illegally, I have a duty to enforce the law. My job is to empower our 22 agencies at Homeland Security to support President Trump’s national security mission and protect the homeland. Thanks for the conversation, Bret Baier

If you are in this country illegally, I have a duty to enforce the law. My job is to empower our 22 agencies at Homeland Security to support President Trump’s national security mission and protect the homeland. Thanks for the conversation, Bret Baier

Secretary Markwayne Mullin

95,896 views • 5 months ago

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "Greenland is essential to the U.S. national security... President Trump is being strategic. He's looking beyond this year, he's looking beyond next year, to what could happen for a battle in the arctic. We are not going to outsource our national security."

.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "Greenland is essential to the U.S. national security... President Trump is being strategic. He's looking beyond this year, he's looking beyond next year, to what could happen for a battle in the arctic. We are not going to outsource our national security."

Rapid Response 47

739,014 views • 8 months ago

US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent: For years, for over a century, American presidents have wanted to acquire Greenland, and what we can see is that Greenland is essential to the U.S. national security. President Trump is being strategic.

US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent: For years, for over a century, American presidents have wanted to acquire Greenland, and what we can see is that Greenland is essential to the U.S. national security. President Trump is being strategic.

Anton Gerashchenko

35,474 views • 8 months ago

PRESS SEC: "The administration is not going to tolerate leaks especially from within the national security apparatus of the U.S. government that put our nation's integrity and our national security at risk."

PRESS SEC: "The administration is not going to tolerate leaks especially from within the national security apparatus of the U.S. government that put our nation's integrity and our national security at risk."

Breaking911

26,065 views • 8 months ago

It is not just the media & politicians that have BLOOD on their hands One of our national security agencies has ONLY NOW, post-Belfast, declared migrants are a NATIONAL SECURITY risk Watch our hard-hitting show: In this clip David Oldroyd-Bolt skewers those in charge: "The frequency of these atrocities, the severity of them, & the unbridled BLOODLUST of those committing them, demonstrates that "this is NOT a problem of integration or assimilation or isolated instances of migrants with axes to grind. "This is a general systemic problem. "I think the fact that the national security agency has only just, in the past two days, said that immigration is a problem is not just bolting the door after the horse has bolted. "It's bolting the stable door when the horse bolted, gone off, found pasture, sired foals, and has died a long natural death. "It is absolutely absurd that the people WE PAY to look out on our behalf for these kind of threats are ONLY JUST stating in public that mass migration is the greatest single threat to national security."

It is not just the media & politicians that have BLOOD on their hands One of our national security agencies has ONLY NOW, post-Belfast, declared migrants are a NATIONAL SECURITY risk Watch our hard-hitting show: In this clip David Oldroyd-Bolt skewers those in charge: "The frequency of these atrocities, the severity of them, & the unbridled BLOODLUST of those committing them, demonstrates that "this is NOT a problem of integration or assimilation or isolated instances of migrants with axes to grind. "This is a general systemic problem. "I think the fact that the national security agency has only just, in the past two days, said that immigration is a problem is not just bolting the door after the horse has bolted. "It's bolting the stable door when the horse bolted, gone off, found pasture, sired foals, and has died a long natural death. "It is absolutely absurd that the people WE PAY to look out on our behalf for these kind of threats are ONLY JUST stating in public that mass migration is the greatest single threat to national security."

The New Culture Forum

13,599 views • 3 months ago

“It is an imperative that we spend more on defence. It is absolutely essential for our national security” Responding to a #bbcqt audience member, Labour’s Bridget Phillipson says that “fiscal rules matter” and the government will “grow our economy” in order to raise funds

“It is an imperative that we spend more on defence. It is absolutely essential for our national security” Responding to a #bbcqt audience member, Labour’s Bridget Phillipson says that “fiscal rules matter” and the government will “grow our economy” in order to raise funds

BBC Question Time

28,175 views • 1 year ago

Ted Cruz says acquiring Greenland is a smart move for U.S. security and the economy, citing its critical minerals and strategic position as China and Russia ramp up activity in the Arctic: “President Trump is exactly right that it is overwhelmingly in the national security interest and economic interest to acquire Greenland. Economically, they have vast rare earth minerals and critical minerals there that are incredibly important to our economy and national defense. And from a national security standpoint, Greenland’s location in the Arctic is vitally important, especially with both China and Russia becoming more active and aggressive in the Arctic. The question is how this is going to happen, and I think the answer is that it is going to happen through a voluntarily negotiated acquisition. The media acts like there is something bizarre and unusual about the notion of acquiring territory. If you go back to Thomas Jefferson, he signed the Louisiana Purchase, acquiring about half of what is today the United States.”

Ted Cruz says acquiring Greenland is a smart move for U.S. security and the economy, citing its critical minerals and strategic position as China and Russia ramp up activity in the Arctic: “President Trump is exactly right that it is overwhelmingly in the national security interest and economic interest to acquire Greenland. Economically, they have vast rare earth minerals and critical minerals there that are incredibly important to our economy and national defense. And from a national security standpoint, Greenland’s location in the Arctic is vitally important, especially with both China and Russia becoming more active and aggressive in the Arctic. The question is how this is going to happen, and I think the answer is that it is going to happen through a voluntarily negotiated acquisition. The media acts like there is something bizarre and unusual about the notion of acquiring territory. If you go back to Thomas Jefferson, he signed the Louisiana Purchase, acquiring about half of what is today the United States.”

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

116,269 views • 8 months ago

Speaker Mike Johnson on AI regulation: "We cannot have a moratorium on the development of AI because then we will lose our edge to China, and that has serious national security implications for every American family."

Speaker Mike Johnson on AI regulation: "We cannot have a moratorium on the development of AI because then we will lose our edge to China, and that has serious national security implications for every American family."

Breaking911

66,938 views • 5 days ago

Labor cannot be trusted with our national security. We have sitting Labor MPs calling for AUKUS to be scrapped, and now we have a former Labor minister (now a musician!) heading up an inquiry into the whole thing, backed by multiple sitting MPs. The Labor Government claims to still support the AUKUS submarine deal, but the only thing that is certain is that the whole issue has triggered chaos and division within the Labor Party. The irony is that, in the last few days, the Labor Defence Minister claimed that raising concerns about mass migration and integration was harmful to our national security. The reality is that one of the biggest threats to our national security is this chaotic and failing Labor Government.

Labor cannot be trusted with our national security. We have sitting Labor MPs calling for AUKUS to be scrapped, and now we have a former Labor minister (now a musician!) heading up an inquiry into the whole thing, backed by multiple sitting MPs. The Labor Government claims to still support the AUKUS submarine deal, but the only thing that is certain is that the whole issue has triggered chaos and division within the Labor Party. The irony is that, in the last few days, the Labor Defence Minister claimed that raising concerns about mass migration and integration was harmful to our national security. The reality is that one of the biggest threats to our national security is this chaotic and failing Labor Government.

One Nation Australia

20,219 views • 3 months ago

Gautam Adani Explains the “New Geometry of Power” “Energy security and digital security are now the twin foundations of national power.” At CII 2026, Adani said semiconductors, AI, data, and energy infrastructure are no longer just economic assets... they are strategic instruments that will shape the century ahead.

Gautam Adani Explains the “New Geometry of Power” “Energy security and digital security are now the twin foundations of national power.” At CII 2026, Adani said semiconductors, AI, data, and energy infrastructure are no longer just economic assets... they are strategic instruments that will shape the century ahead.

Dr Umesh Kumar Upadhyay

42,109 views • 4 months ago

🚨 MARCO RUBIO CALLS OUT THE CHINESE THEFT They are trying to viciously STEAL our AI! “It's always been both [national and economic security] because deeply embedded in all of our national security is our economic security.” "Every country in the world, every foreign actor with the capability, is trying to steal our intellectual property because it benefits them, because we're the best at the world at it. So this is a real threat." Trey Yingst Catch all CCP spies!

🚨 MARCO RUBIO CALLS OUT THE CHINESE THEFT They are trying to viciously STEAL our AI! “It's always been both [national and economic security] because deeply embedded in all of our national security is our economic security.” "Every country in the world, every foreign actor with the capability, is trying to steal our intellectual property because it benefits them, because we're the best at the world at it. So this is a real threat." Trey Yingst Catch all CCP spies!

Eric Daugherty

34,678 views • 4 months ago

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 views • 11 months ago