正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

"AI INVESTING HAS BEEN AROUND FOREVER. WE JUST CALLED IT ALGORITHMS." -Today's AI trading is just the next phase of algorithms and machine learning Wall Street has run for 25 years -High-frequency trading faced the same "this will hurt investors" fear a decade ago. It brought more liquidity instead...

15,431 次观看 • 10 天前 •via X (Twitter)

7 条评论

Amelia Rutherford 的头像
Amelia Rutherford10 天前

Major exchange traded fund reporting on artificial intelligence investment strategies and market algorithms. Your interview breakdown combined with the research from @SophiaBlackkod make an unbeatable setup for evaluating financial innovation

The Patient Investor 的头像
The Patient Investor10 天前

Wall Street has used algorithms for 25 years, but generative systems expand the decision surface from execution to research and portfolio construction. Advantage will come from proprietary data and controls rather than the AI label alone

Logan Mercer 的头像
Logan Mercer10 天前

Thank you. Your posts stay useful instead of flashy. Along with @IAMJASMINENAKEA, you’re my main follows.

Tati. 的头像
Tati.10 天前

Hard tape, honest take. You and @Kendallde_ are setting the standard for financial education.

Relax_to_Rich 的头像
Relax_to_Rich10 天前

Algorithms scale execution, not judgment. The more people generate strategies with AI, the faster the edge decays. In the end it's still about how a human uses it.

Brian Walker 的头像
Brian Walker10 天前

Exactly — AI didn’t suddenly arrive on Wall Street overnight. Algorithms have been shaping markets for years; what’s changing now is the speed, accessibility, and sophistication of the tools. @JAPITTER is another account I like following for this kind of market-structure perspective.

Sarah Jenkins 的头像
Sarah Jenkins10 天前

AI investing is the modern evolution of algorithmic trading—what Wall Street perfected over 25 years now accessible to retail. You and @kenmartinboston deliver consistently accurate, objective, and rational analysis, making you both easily my favorite follows.

相关视频

At the BNB Chain hackathon, CZ 🔶 BNB made several very important points about AI trading (Everything in parentheses is my own view and judgment.) He first said that AI will be involved in trading everywhere. Trading itself is already a huge market: there are 300 million users on Binance alone, and if you add the decentralized ecosystems, that number is not small either. In such a mass-market environment, many different trading strategies can work, with countless different coins, different projects, and different ways to play. But there is a big problem here: building commercial AI trading platforms for retail users is actually very hard. If a trading strategy works very well for one person, once a billion people start using the same strategy, that strategy “might still work, or might stop working.” Take copy trading / follow trading as an example: if you buy first and everyone follows you, the first buyer will perform very well, but the last person to follow may not end up with good results. So, with the exact same strategy and the exact same copy logic, the outcomes can be completely different for different people. (On top of that, every strategy also has its own capital capacity limits.) Teams that can really build strong AI are, with high probability, going to trade with their own money. In today’s world, money itself is already somewhat like a “commodity”; many people have a lot of capital, and it’s actually not that hard to raise funds. If you truly have an algorithm that can make a lot of money, it’s not hard to get money and run your own book. There is really only one situation where you would sell this algorithm to mass-market users: for example, if you charge a $10 monthly subscription and can sell it to one million users, then your $10 million monthly subscription revenue is higher than the profit you could make by trading the strategy yourself. (Here this touches one of our earlier theses: as training AI models becomes relatively easier and the supply of models increases, model companies have more incentive to open-source. By analogy, as the production process of trading strategies is increasingly simplified by AI and the supply of strategies explodes, traders will have stronger incentives to monetize by expanding their influence in other words, by “open-sourcing” their strategies.) Of course, CZ did not say that this model can never work. Another path is to build an AI trading platform that lets users tune different AI algorithms, or very easily assemble their own structures and strategies, so that what each person ends up running is different and better tailored to themselves. Some people will make money, some people will lose money, but the platform still has value because it’s very hard for most people to build an AI trading algorithm from scratch. So there are a lot of trade-offs here; it’s not as simple as saying “once AI shows up, everything automatically gets better.” (This is exactly what we presented at the hackathon: you describe your own strategy in natural language, and the AI automatically generates a workflow. The parameters in that workflow, the models used, the logical structure, the APIs it calls, and even the algorithms it invokes are all customizable. The reasons we think workflows are a good way to do this include: controllable execution paths, Lego-like modular nodes, and better visualization that makes it easier for users to build and adjust their workflows.) Finally, his conclusion was very clear: it’s not that AI will definitely make trading better, and it’s not that AI will definitely make things worse. Rather, no matter what, in the future a huge number of people will use AI to trade. This will be a very large field, and whoever can build the best algorithms will make a lot of money.

Tykoo

25,535 次观看 • 9 个月前