正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

"AI Itself Is Trained On Wikipedia Articles, So It's Not Like Wikipedia Doesn't Matter Anymore- It Still Matters A Lot!" Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia- Larry Singer- Warns That Wikipedia Is Used In Language Learning Models To Train AI, And It Is Being Programmed Strictly From A Globalist,...

RealAlexJones's profile picture

Alex Jones

4,468,047 subscribers

88,362 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

EXCLUSIVE: Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, Joins The Alex Jones Show To Reveal How His Attempts To Reform The Online Encyclopedia Led To Him Being BANNED From Editing Articles On The Site He Created! "Wikipedia Is Arguably The Single Most Influential Information Resource Of Its Kind, And We Have No Idea Who Really Runs It!" PLUS, Sanger Goes On To Warn That Wikipedia Is Used In Language Learning Models To Train AI, And It Is Being Programmed Strictly From A Globalist, Academic, Secular, & Progressive Point Of View! MUST-WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW! Larry Sanger Alex Jones Network Harrison H. Smith ✞ 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:
56:36

EXCLUSIVE: Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, Joins The Alex Jones Show To Reveal How His Attempts To Reform The Online Encyclopedia Led To Him Being BANNED From Editing Articles On The Site He Created! "Wikipedia Is Arguably The Single Most Influential Information Resource Of Its Kind, And We Have No Idea Who Really Runs It!" PLUS, Sanger Goes On To Warn That Wikipedia Is Used In Language Learning Models To Train AI, And It Is Being Programmed Strictly From A Globalist, Academic, Secular, & Progressive Point Of View! MUST-WATCH/SHARE FULL INTERVIEW! Larry Sanger Alex Jones Network Harrison H. Smith ✞ 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

Alex Jones

423,137 次观看 • 1 天前

GASP Defined: Globalist, Academic, Secular, & Progressive! Larry Singer, Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia, Describes The Primary Point Of View Now Exercised By The Website He Created & How He Attempted To Reform It 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:
2:24

GASP Defined: Globalist, Academic, Secular, & Progressive! Larry Singer, Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia, Describes The Primary Point Of View Now Exercised By The Website He Created & How He Attempted To Reform It 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

Alex Jones

93,331 次观看 • 1 天前

⚠️"I Was BLOCKED From Wikipedia For Making An Effort To Reform It!" Larry Singer, Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia, Details His Proposal To Reform The Site With "Intellectual Diversity, Greater Openness, & Tolerance" In The Face Of Its Unified Globalist Point Of View Which Led To Him Being Banned: "I Think They Were Very Threatened By The Fact That I Could Actually Succeed In Reforming Wikipedia Because My Proposals Were Perfectly In Line With The Original Vision Of Wikipedia! It's A Classical Liberal Value To Let Everybody Have An Equal Say On The Platform!" 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:
9:28

⚠️"I Was BLOCKED From Wikipedia For Making An Effort To Reform It!" Larry Singer, Founder & Original Editor Of Wikipedia, Details His Proposal To Reform The Site With "Intellectual Diversity, Greater Openness, & Tolerance" In The Face Of Its Unified Globalist Point Of View Which Led To Him Being Banned: "I Think They Were Very Threatened By The Fact That I Could Actually Succeed In Reforming Wikipedia Because My Proposals Were Perfectly In Line With The Original Vision Of Wikipedia! It's A Classical Liberal Value To Let Everybody Have An Equal Say On The Platform!" 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

Alex Jones

117,326 次观看 • 1 天前

Wikipedia has turned into “an engine of defamation,” says Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger Larry Sanger. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call ‘perennial sources,’ and it functions as a blacklist. And according to this list, you simply may not cite—may not use as sources of Wikipedia articles—anything that has been branded as ‘right-wing.’ …The Epoch Times, for example…is colored red on this list.”
1:23

Wikipedia has turned into “an engine of defamation,” says Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger Larry Sanger. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call ‘perennial sources,’ and it functions as a blacklist. And according to this list, you simply may not cite—may not use as sources of Wikipedia articles—anything that has been branded as ‘right-wing.’ …The Epoch Times, for example…is colored red on this list.”

Jan Jekielek

15,588 次观看 • 9 个月前

Wikipedia Founder Larry Sanger Responds To The Destruction Of Millions Of Physical Books By Anthropic As They Train Its Claude AI Models: "The Reason Why Books Continue To Matter In An Age Of AI Is That Books Provide The Logical Meaning-Driven Scaffolding That We Need To Think Through Problems In A Systematic Way, And That Is Simply Not Given By Ready Answers! That Just Gives You Facts!" 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:
7:13

Wikipedia Founder Larry Sanger Responds To The Destruction Of Millions Of Physical Books By Anthropic As They Train Its Claude AI Models: "The Reason Why Books Continue To Matter In An Age Of AI Is That Books Provide The Logical Meaning-Driven Scaffolding That We Need To Think Through Problems In A Systematic Way, And That Is Simply Not Given By Ready Answers! That Just Gives You Facts!" 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM NOW:

Alex Jones

124,574 次观看 • 1 天前

This is why it’s such a huge deal that Wikipedia is Woke and full of bias leftist propaganda Wikipedia is one of the most cited sources for AI. It’s a top source by Google Search, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, Perplexity, Siri, Alexa and more Multiple studies show it accounts for a huge portion of citations in AI models, as many as 27% in some ChatGPT analyses It gets even worse, Google frequently places Wikipedia at the top of results, in Knowledge Panels, and in AI summaries for a vast majority of informational and topic searches Co-founder Larry Sanger has publicly stated the site has a significant left-leaning bias It’s horrifying to think that this much information from woke Wikipedia is being pulled by AI and used in their outputs This is so serious that we need intervention At the very least we need Search engines & AI diversification Google, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude and everyone else should reduce reliance on Wikipedia as a primary source and pull from a wider range of reputable references Wikipedia is not even close to being neutral on many topics
3:06

This is why it’s such a huge deal that Wikipedia is Woke and full of bias leftist propaganda Wikipedia is one of the most cited sources for AI. It’s a top source by Google Search, Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, Perplexity, Siri, Alexa and more Multiple studies show it accounts for a huge portion of citations in AI models, as many as 27% in some ChatGPT analyses It gets even worse, Google frequently places Wikipedia at the top of results, in Knowledge Panels, and in AI summaries for a vast majority of informational and topic searches Co-founder Larry Sanger has publicly stated the site has a significant left-leaning bias It’s horrifying to think that this much information from woke Wikipedia is being pulled by AI and used in their outputs This is so serious that we need intervention At the very least we need Search engines & AI diversification Google, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Claude and everyone else should reduce reliance on Wikipedia as a primary source and pull from a wider range of reputable references Wikipedia is not even close to being neutral on many topics

Wall Street Apes

21,630 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇺🇸 Wikipedia co-founder: “Wikipedia is leftist propaganda” Larry Sanger now he feels bitter disappointment in Wikipedia: “For the first 5 years or so, Wikipedia honestly tried to remain neutral, but then began a long and slow slide towards what I call leftist propaganda. It's a strong statement, I understand, but at least the political content on Wikipedia nowadays is of that kind. And this happened because in the last 10-15 years Wikipedia has strictly followed the course of the media, getting rid of all other sources from which it draws information. First it got rid of blogs, and in the last 10 years almost all conservative information resources. And since the media themselves, as well as the political establishment, have tilted to the left, Wikipedia followed them. Ten years ago it would have been hard for me to believe in the possibility of such drastic changes. But by around 2010 the slide to the left had already begun.”
1:39

🇺🇸 Wikipedia co-founder: “Wikipedia is leftist propaganda” Larry Sanger now he feels bitter disappointment in Wikipedia: “For the first 5 years or so, Wikipedia honestly tried to remain neutral, but then began a long and slow slide towards what I call leftist propaganda. It's a strong statement, I understand, but at least the political content on Wikipedia nowadays is of that kind. And this happened because in the last 10-15 years Wikipedia has strictly followed the course of the media, getting rid of all other sources from which it draws information. First it got rid of blogs, and in the last 10 years almost all conservative information resources. And since the media themselves, as well as the political establishment, have tilted to the left, Wikipedia followed them. Ten years ago it would have been hard for me to believe in the possibility of such drastic changes. But by around 2010 the slide to the left had already begun.”

Lord Bebo

17,393 次观看 • 9 个月前

“Wikipedia is one of the controlling institutions of modern civilization.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger says the platform has become a vehicle for propaganda. “One of the left-wing theorists’ explicitly stated goals… is they need to march through the institutions.” “Essentially capture education, government, media, the churches, and so forth.” “Each of these institutions has been, to a greater or lesser extent, systematically, carefully, strategically infiltrated by the left.” “Wikipedia is one of those, insofar as Wikipedia sort of represents what we are all expected to believe, at least from an establishment point of view.” Larry Sanger
1:11

“Wikipedia is one of the controlling institutions of modern civilization.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger says the platform has become a vehicle for propaganda. “One of the left-wing theorists’ explicitly stated goals… is they need to march through the institutions.” “Essentially capture education, government, media, the churches, and so forth.” “Each of these institutions has been, to a greater or lesser extent, systematically, carefully, strategically infiltrated by the left.” “Wikipedia is one of those, insofar as Wikipedia sort of represents what we are all expected to believe, at least from an establishment point of view.” Larry Sanger

Jan Jekielek

14,768 次观看 • 5 个月前

The left is what Wikipedia sees the world through. You can get a sense of what it what it would look like to change that lens if you go to Grokipedia. If you take the same article on Wikipedia and Grokipedia, they're gonna look really different. Even if you disagree with what's written on Grokipedia and agree with what is on Wikipedia, you're still gonna see that there are two ways to present the issue and Wikipedia is not the way. It's not neutral. (Ashley Rindsberg // The Free Press)
0:50

The left is what Wikipedia sees the world through. You can get a sense of what it what it would look like to change that lens if you go to Grokipedia. If you take the same article on Wikipedia and Grokipedia, they're gonna look really different. Even if you disagree with what's written on Grokipedia and agree with what is on Wikipedia, you're still gonna see that there are two ways to present the issue and Wikipedia is not the way. It's not neutral. (Ashley Rindsberg // The Free Press)

Katie Miller

634,066 次观看 • 3 个月前

TUNE IN: Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales calls Grokipedia a "ridiculous idea" that "will never work." Wales: "One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality… The idea that we've become somehow 'Wokepidea' is just not true." Q: "And on the competition between Wikipedia and Grokipedia?" Wales: "There's no competition!"
1:39

TUNE IN: Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales calls Grokipedia a "ridiculous idea" that "will never work." Wales: "One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality… The idea that we've become somehow 'Wokepidea' is just not true." Q: "And on the competition between Wikipedia and Grokipedia?" Wales: "There's no competition!"

Resist the Mainstream

621,918 次观看 • 5 个月前

Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt. (0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia (4:27) Wikipedia’s Dangerous Policy Changes (14:01) Who Is Responsible for Corrupting Wikipedia? (17:47) Why Did Sanger Leave Wikipedia? (19:29) Who Is Wikipedia Co-Creator Jimmy Wales? (23:43) What Does the “Tucker Carlson” Wikipedia Page Say? (27:39) How Does Wikipedia Actually Work? (28:43) How Wikipedia Blacklists Conservatives (37:28) Is Wikipedia Controlled by the Intel Agencies? (40:16) Sanger’s Request to Elon Musk and Donald Trump to Help Fix Wikipedia (49:43) Are Wikipedia Editors Being Secretly Paid to Push Propaganda? (56:06) Wikipedia’s Dark Alliance With Google (1:01:41) How Wikipedia Can Be Saved (1:07:22) Which News Sources Are Blacklisted by Wikipedia? (1:17:29) Why Don’t We Know Who’s Editing Wikipedia? (1:19:53) Should Wikipedia Users Be Able to Rate Articles? (1:22:01) Why Wikipedia Should End Permanent Bans (1:27:16) This Is How to Bring Reform to Wikipedia Includes paid partnerships.
1:32:46

Larry Sanger built Wikipedia as an unbiased repository of the world’s knowledge, and then stood helplessly by as activists and intel agencies turned it into the most comprehensive propaganda op in human history. There’s nothing more corrupt. (0:00) The Origins of Wikipedia (4:27) Wikipedia’s Dangerous Policy Changes (14:01) Who Is Responsible for Corrupting Wikipedia? (17:47) Why Did Sanger Leave Wikipedia? (19:29) Who Is Wikipedia Co-Creator Jimmy Wales? (23:43) What Does the “Tucker Carlson” Wikipedia Page Say? (27:39) How Does Wikipedia Actually Work? (28:43) How Wikipedia Blacklists Conservatives (37:28) Is Wikipedia Controlled by the Intel Agencies? (40:16) Sanger’s Request to Elon Musk and Donald Trump to Help Fix Wikipedia (49:43) Are Wikipedia Editors Being Secretly Paid to Push Propaganda? (56:06) Wikipedia’s Dark Alliance With Google (1:01:41) How Wikipedia Can Be Saved (1:07:22) Which News Sources Are Blacklisted by Wikipedia? (1:17:29) Why Don’t We Know Who’s Editing Wikipedia? (1:19:53) Should Wikipedia Users Be Able to Rate Articles? (1:22:01) Why Wikipedia Should End Permanent Bans (1:27:16) This Is How to Bring Reform to Wikipedia Includes paid partnerships.

Tucker Carlson

3,860,731 次观看 • 10 个月前

Elon Musk: Grokipedia will succeed, I think it's fundamentally a superior product to Wikipedia. It is a better source of information and we haven't even added images and video yet "When you read a Grokipedia article about a subject or a person that you know a lot about, and you see, 'Wow, this is way better than Wikipedia. It's more comprehensive, it's way more accurate, it’s neutral instead of biased'....then you're gonna forward those links around and say, 'This is actually the better source' Grokipedia will succeed, I think very well, because it is fundamentally a superior product to Wikipedia. It is a better source of information. And we haven't even added images and video yet And then we used that latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia, which I think is it's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page"
0:57

Elon Musk: Grokipedia will succeed, I think it's fundamentally a superior product to Wikipedia. It is a better source of information and we haven't even added images and video yet "When you read a Grokipedia article about a subject or a person that you know a lot about, and you see, 'Wow, this is way better than Wikipedia. It's more comprehensive, it's way more accurate, it’s neutral instead of biased'....then you're gonna forward those links around and say, 'This is actually the better source' Grokipedia will succeed, I think very well, because it is fundamentally a superior product to Wikipedia. It is a better source of information. And we haven't even added images and video yet And then we used that latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia, which I think is it's not just, I think, more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia, but actually has a lot more information than a Wikipedia page"

X Freeze

109,095 次观看 • 8 个月前

NEW: Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales storms out of an interview after just 48 seconds when podcast host Tilo Jung asked him if he was "founder" or "co-founder." Wales: I'm Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia. Jung: You're the founder or co-founder? Wales: I don't care. It's the dumbest question in the world... It doesn't matter. Jung: Isn't that like, when it comes to Wikipedia, a problem? What are the facts? Wales: Well, it's not a fact, it's an opinion. Jung: But for you, you're the founder... Wales: Can I just say again, it doesn't matter. I've answered your question four times... You know what? I'm done. H/t: Champagne Joshi
1:36

NEW: Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales storms out of an interview after just 48 seconds when podcast host Tilo Jung asked him if he was "founder" or "co-founder." Wales: I'm Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia. Jung: You're the founder or co-founder? Wales: I don't care. It's the dumbest question in the world... It doesn't matter. Jung: Isn't that like, when it comes to Wikipedia, a problem? What are the facts? Wales: Well, it's not a fact, it's an opinion. Jung: But for you, you're the founder... Wales: Can I just say again, it doesn't matter. I've answered your question four times... You know what? I'm done. H/t: Champagne Joshi

Collin Rugg

7,331,150 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is the founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, who was recently interviewed by Tucker Carlson In response to my post questioning why he is repeating ADL’s talking points about Wikipedia’s editing on Israel’s genocide, he claims I’m blaming the “Jooos” I never said anything about the “Jooos” or Jews. The fact that you are trying to make it about antisemitism, confirms my suspicions that you are in fact lobbying on the side of entities like the ADL & Israel. You mentioned the ADL 1 time in your interview and only in the context of complaining that the genocidal Israeli POV is underrepresented on Wikipedia. ADL and Israel have a documented history of manipulating Wikipedia. Naftali Bennett, the former Prime Minister of Israel is on record explaining how they train Wikipedia editors to ensure Wikipedia is “Zionist in nature”. Last year, Wikipedia editors finally attempted to make entries about Israel’s genocide of Palestinians reflective of the facts that the whole world witnessed, they also moved to ban ADL as a reliable source on Israel/Palestine and on antisemitism since ADL uses the bogus IHRA definition which makes criticism of Israel and bible references, antisemitic. In retaliation, ADL & Ashley Rinsberg (also a Zionist) made up bogus claims about 30-40 Muslims making Wikipedia “Pro-Hamas”. Then you went on Tucker Carlson and made the same claims and suggested Israeli Intelligence should launch a campaign to manipulate Wikipedia. You are either clueless or a fraud with an alternative agenda who is using conservative outrage at years of CIA and Israeli intelligence manipulation of Wikipedia to further your goal of censoring Wikipedia to favor Israel & Zionism.
4:46

This is the founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger, who was recently interviewed by Tucker Carlson In response to my post questioning why he is repeating ADL’s talking points about Wikipedia’s editing on Israel’s genocide, he claims I’m blaming the “Jooos” I never said anything about the “Jooos” or Jews. The fact that you are trying to make it about antisemitism, confirms my suspicions that you are in fact lobbying on the side of entities like the ADL & Israel. You mentioned the ADL 1 time in your interview and only in the context of complaining that the genocidal Israeli POV is underrepresented on Wikipedia. ADL and Israel have a documented history of manipulating Wikipedia. Naftali Bennett, the former Prime Minister of Israel is on record explaining how they train Wikipedia editors to ensure Wikipedia is “Zionist in nature”. Last year, Wikipedia editors finally attempted to make entries about Israel’s genocide of Palestinians reflective of the facts that the whole world witnessed, they also moved to ban ADL as a reliable source on Israel/Palestine and on antisemitism since ADL uses the bogus IHRA definition which makes criticism of Israel and bible references, antisemitic. In retaliation, ADL & Ashley Rinsberg (also a Zionist) made up bogus claims about 30-40 Muslims making Wikipedia “Pro-Hamas”. Then you went on Tucker Carlson and made the same claims and suggested Israeli Intelligence should launch a campaign to manipulate Wikipedia. You are either clueless or a fraud with an alternative agenda who is using conservative outrage at years of CIA and Israeli intelligence manipulation of Wikipedia to further your goal of censoring Wikipedia to favor Israel & Zionism.

GenXGirl

31,350 次观看 • 10 个月前

ELON: GROKIPEDIA IS FUNDAMENTALLY SUPERIOR TO WIKIPEDIA “When you read a Grokipedia article about a subject or a person that you know a lot about, you see, wow, this is way better than Wikipedia. It's more comprehensive, it's way more accurate, it's neutral instead of biased. So, you're going to send those links around and say that this is actually the better source. Grokipedia will succeed, I think, very well because it is fundamentally a superior product to Wikipedia.” Source: All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025
0:27

ELON: GROKIPEDIA IS FUNDAMENTALLY SUPERIOR TO WIKIPEDIA “When you read a Grokipedia article about a subject or a person that you know a lot about, you see, wow, this is way better than Wikipedia. It's more comprehensive, it's way more accurate, it's neutral instead of biased. So, you're going to send those links around and say that this is actually the better source. Grokipedia will succeed, I think, very well because it is fundamentally a superior product to Wikipedia.” Source: All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025

Mario Nawfal

224,139 次观看 • 8 个月前

NEW INVESTIGATION: New York Times Bestselling author and journalist Max Lugavere has endured a sustained reputation attack on Wikipedia. In an interview, Max tells NPOV's Ashley Rindsberg how the Wikipedia attack damaged his reputation and turned his life's work—researching ways to prevent the dementia that took his mother's life—into malicious accusations. NPOV's investigation reveals a deeply coordinated network of editors called "the Skeptics" that works on Wikipedia as a coordinated editing group known as Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia (GSOW). + The opening of the Wikipedia entry falsely labels Max an "anti-vegan activist." This now appears prominently on Google searches on Max. + Carefully curated film reviews are used to indirectly accuse Max of attempting to profit from his mother's disease and tragic death. + The key elements of the attack rely on articles written by two members of a center at McGill University known as the Office for Science and Society (OSS). + The main editor on Max's entry adds content from OSS figures, whose own entries on Wikipedia were created and/or currently controlled by GSOW editor Robincantin. + Susan Gerbic, a contributor to Skeptical Inquirer magazine and a fellow of the NGO that owns the magazine, has identified one Robin Cantin as "my editor." + Gerbic is founder of the Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia project. Watch the NPOV video here👇 For the full NPOV investigation, see the link in thread.
1:21

NEW INVESTIGATION: New York Times Bestselling author and journalist Max Lugavere has endured a sustained reputation attack on Wikipedia. In an interview, Max tells NPOV's Ashley Rindsberg how the Wikipedia attack damaged his reputation and turned his life's work—researching ways to prevent the dementia that took his mother's life—into malicious accusations. NPOV's investigation reveals a deeply coordinated network of editors called "the Skeptics" that works on Wikipedia as a coordinated editing group known as Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia (GSOW). + The opening of the Wikipedia entry falsely labels Max an "anti-vegan activist." This now appears prominently on Google searches on Max. + Carefully curated film reviews are used to indirectly accuse Max of attempting to profit from his mother's disease and tragic death. + The key elements of the attack rely on articles written by two members of a center at McGill University known as the Office for Science and Society (OSS). + The main editor on Max's entry adds content from OSS figures, whose own entries on Wikipedia were created and/or currently controlled by GSOW editor Robincantin. + Susan Gerbic, a contributor to Skeptical Inquirer magazine and a fellow of the NGO that owns the magazine, has identified one Robin Cantin as "my editor." + Gerbic is founder of the Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia project. Watch the NPOV video here👇 For the full NPOV investigation, see the link in thread.

NPOV

48,802 次观看 • 6 个月前

ELON: GROKIPEDIA IS GOING TO BE A HUNDRED TIMES BETTER THAN WIKIPEDIA “I have complete confidence that Grokipedia is going to succeed because Wikipedia is actually not a very good product. On Wikipedia, the information is sparse, wrong, and out of date. There are very few images; there's basically no video. So, if you have something that is accurate, comprehensive, has videos, where, moreover, you can ask if there's any part of it that you're curious about—you can just highlight it and ask Grok right there, if you're trying to learn something, it's just great—it's not going to be a little bit better than Wikipedia; it's going to be a hundred times better.” Source: Elon Musk, All-In Podcast The All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025
0:28

ELON: GROKIPEDIA IS GOING TO BE A HUNDRED TIMES BETTER THAN WIKIPEDIA “I have complete confidence that Grokipedia is going to succeed because Wikipedia is actually not a very good product. On Wikipedia, the information is sparse, wrong, and out of date. There are very few images; there's basically no video. So, if you have something that is accurate, comprehensive, has videos, where, moreover, you can ask if there's any part of it that you're curious about—you can just highlight it and ask Grok right there, if you're trying to learn something, it's just great—it's not going to be a little bit better than Wikipedia; it's going to be a hundred times better.” Source: Elon Musk, All-In Podcast The All-In Podcast, October 31, 2025

Mario Nawfal

79,772 次观看 • 8 个月前

“You simply may not cite, or use as sources… anything that has been branded as right wing.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger revealed to me that Wikipedia has a blacklist of sources that, if used, can prevent you from posting on the site. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call perennial sources, and it functions as a blacklist.” “There’s a color coding of different media sources.” “The New York Times, of course, is green, which means you can cite The New York Times.” “Anything that is colored yellow means essentially caution.” “And red means it’s a no go.” “If you actually attempt to use such sources, that actually might be grounds for you being dismissed from the project.”
1:54

“You simply may not cite, or use as sources… anything that has been branded as right wing.” Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger revealed to me that Wikipedia has a blacklist of sources that, if used, can prevent you from posting on the site. “Wikipedia now has a list of what they call perennial sources, and it functions as a blacklist.” “There’s a color coding of different media sources.” “The New York Times, of course, is green, which means you can cite The New York Times.” “Anything that is colored yellow means essentially caution.” “And red means it’s a no go.” “If you actually attempt to use such sources, that actually might be grounds for you being dismissed from the project.”

Jan Jekielek

256,170 次观看 • 5 个月前

ELON: GROKIPEDIA CALLS BULL ON “TECHNICALLY TRUE” FACTS “We used the latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia, which I think is just more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia. We trained Grok on a lot of critical thinking. We took that version of Grok and said: ‘Cycle through the million most popular articles in Wikipedia and add, modify, and delete. Correct the Wikipedia articles to fix mistakes, but also add a lot more context.’ This is version 0.1. By the time we get to version 1.0, it’ll be 10 times better. It’s not just correcting errors, but creating a more accurate, realistic, and fleshed-out description of people and events.” Source: The All-In Podcast, Elon Musk, 31 October 2025
1:17

ELON: GROKIPEDIA CALLS BULL ON “TECHNICALLY TRUE” FACTS “We used the latest version of Grok to create Grokipedia, which I think is just more neutral and more accurate than Wikipedia. We trained Grok on a lot of critical thinking. We took that version of Grok and said: ‘Cycle through the million most popular articles in Wikipedia and add, modify, and delete. Correct the Wikipedia articles to fix mistakes, but also add a lot more context.’ This is version 0.1. By the time we get to version 1.0, it’ll be 10 times better. It’s not just correcting errors, but creating a more accurate, realistic, and fleshed-out description of people and events.” Source: The All-In Podcast, Elon Musk, 31 October 2025

Mario Nawfal

17,238,093 次观看 • 9 个月前