Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
#AIAgents demonstration using #Nano digital currency 🤖↔️ 🤖 Autonomous communication between two LLM-powered bots to facilitate a purchase using Nano ( $XNO ) digital currency. Demo explained 🧵
39,113 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)
14 Yorum
As #AIAgents become more prevalent they will need to interact with the digital economy. #Nano ( $XNO ) is a perfect fit for this as it is feeless with near-instant confirmation times, making for a frictionless UX for AI agents.
Using the @NanoGPTcom API for communication with an LLM of choice (in this case @OpenAI's GPT 4o mini), two bots were coded with their respective metaprompting to make them respond to tasks.
CustomerBot plays the role of a customer and was prompted with the following
ShopBot plays the role of a shop and was prompted with the following
The appropriate code was written to allow each bot to converse with each other. CustomerBot's replies are used to prompt ShopBot and vice versa. Once started this allows the conversation to take place autonomously.
The metaprompting shown earlier gives each bot its mission in the conversation. They are free to accomplish their tasks however they see fit (with sometimes unexpected results!).
It's important to note that each bot is not aware of the other bots information (e.g. Nano addresses, products in stock) at first. All of this understood only through each other's replies and then remembered in the context of the conversation itself.
Once CustomerBot has all the details it needs to make a purchase it communicates with the #Nano network through orchestration code run in its contained environment. JSON created through its metaprompting is used to kick off the process.
ShopBot thanks CustomerBot for the purchase when it detects (via WebSocket) that the nano has been sent. Publishing a receive block is also possible but in this demonstration this was done manually via a user wallet (Nault).
Although for this demonstration @OpenAI's GPT 4o mini was used as the LLM "brain" for the bots, using the @NanoGPTcom API it would be trivial to swap in any LLM, e.g. #Claude or even @grok. Some LLMs with follow the metaprompting better than others.
What this demonstration shows is how easy it is for an #AIAgent to transfer value. All it needs is a Nano wallet and access to the Nano network. It doesn't have to mess about with fee calculation or wait very long for a transaction to confirm. It is as frictionless as it gets.
Eventually AI agents are going to work this out on their own and prefer Nano over other digital currencies. Unpredictable fees and long wait times are going to be unacceptable 🚫 Fast and feeless is the way to go! ✅
Consider sharing this thread if you found it useful! What other use cases can you think of for #AIAgents and #Nano ( $XNO )?
Protect your family and wealth by understanding how money truly works. Sound money can heal our society and you are this 🤏 close from using it in your favor.
![The Trump admin is GASLIGHTING us re: no CBDCs They know they can't do CBDCs because of the Constitution, so they're backdooring them with stablecoins Iain Davis explains— "the idea of a [CBDC] is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system" "CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it" "That's not going to work in the US because... it's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote... to coin money" "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work-round" "So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank" "stablecoins... slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency" "Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose, as central bank digital currency" This clip of Iain Davis (InThisTogether), author of The Technocratic Dark State, is taken from a Flashlights podcast (Flashlights Podcast) episode posted to Rumble on May 17, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "It's a constitutional right in the United States that the people, and only the people, oversee what they call the power, quote–unquote, it says this in the Constitution, to coin money. So the power to coin money is overseen by the people. "Now the idea of a central bank digital currency is that it will give these private institutions total control of a new digital international monetary and financial system. That's CBDC is programmable money that slots into that system. That's why they want it. "That's not going to work in the US because even though Congress, you know, Congress is the, is the dog which is wagged by the tail in this of the Fed, the Fed, you know, the Fed tells Congress what to do, not the other way round. But theoretically it could be the other way round. And theoretically the people could assert their control over the Fed if they only knew about it, which, not many people do, but they could do it, right? It's in the US Constitution. "Now that's a problem if you're going to embark on a global transformation of the entire international monetary and financial system when your leading reserve currency is the US dollar. So that's, you know, that could all go wrong very badly. "So what are you going to do about it? You need some sort of work round. How are you, how are you going to do which for the, you know, I, for many years, well, since central bank digital currency has been something that I've been looking at, I couldn't figure out why the US wasn't more enthusiastic about central bank digital currency. "Because it's the type of thing that the US administrations are usually right up— You know, they're really gung ho about that kind of centralized control of everything. That's right up their alley. So why, why don't they like it? And then it was the work of John Titus who pointed out this problem that they've got in the US with the Constitution that made me look at that and think, right. And then I started investigating that further. And he's right about that. That is a problem. "But then they obviously need some sort of workaround. How are they going to have. Because the main point of central bank digital currency from the surveillance and control aspect is that we will all need digital identity in order to access our digital wallets, which will contain the currency and the currency and the wallets and our, digital identities will all be programmable so conditions can be set on everything that we do. "Every transaction we make will be subject to condition through some sort of smart contract probably, which will control it. Right. So you know, if you say the wrong thing or you know, you, you just write the wrong thing online, you could be punished by algorithm by controlling your access to money... "And so the key to that is central bank— the programmability of central bank digital currency. But obviously that's not going to, may not work. There's a good chance that won't work in the United States which has got the US dollar reserve is an important currency. "So what are you going to do? So stablecoins and things like deposit tokens or tokenized deposits are variations of programmable digital currency. But rather than being issued by a central bank, they're issued by a commercial bank. So or in the case of stablecoins, a non-bank, a non-bank institution like Tether. So it's not a bank. "But you can use stablecoins for exactly the same. They slot into the system of programmability just as easily, if not more so than a central bank digital currency. So you can attach smart contracts to any kind of digital transaction using digital currency. Programmable digital currency and stablecoins do exactly the same thing, serve the same purpose as central bank digital currency or the other version, the commercial bank version is deposit tokens. Any of those will do. "Now in the US they've gone down the stablecoin route so they can issue the stablecoins which will be backed by US Treasuries, just like the dollar or just like any kind of dollar instrument will be one to one convertible for the US dollar. So the stablecoins are effectively the US dollar in, in digital form. "But instead of calling it a central bank digital currency, they call it issued by, it wouldn't have to be issued by the Fed. They call it a stablecoin, which is issued by a company like Tether or you know, someone like that. So it's the same system but using a workaround. And that workaround came with the Genius Act which, which came from an executive order that Trump made when he first came to office. "Because the Americans, quite rightly when they were electing their president, were concerned about central bank digital currency. I mean anyone that understands what it is should be terrified of it. So they didn't want it, and Trump promised that they wouldn't have it. Probably. I don't know whether he knew, but certainly the gaggle of technocrats that were around him knew that they weren't going down that path. Anyway, no chance of the US introducing it because of these problems we've just outlined."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2060155537791303822/amplify_video_thumb/2060149164164669440/img/gbwudVOTDKQpFTbG.jpg)
