Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

AIPAC-backed Haley Stevens when pressed on AIPAC donor money being funneled through unmarked channels: "I'm not hiding anything from voters... Why would you ask me that question?"

TrackAIPAC's profile picture

AIPAC Tracker

475,425 subscribers

48,668 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Abdul: "I'm not accepting money from corporations, AIPAC." Haley Stevens: "where's your tax return" Girl, bye.
0:58

Abdul: "I'm not accepting money from corporations, AIPAC." Haley Stevens: "where's your tax return" Girl, bye.

Winter

605,449 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

El-Sayed not-so-subtly shades Mallory McMorrow. "Never taken money from AIPAC, never would take money from AIPAC, never wrote a position paper for AIPAC, never went on a trip funded by AIPAC… I'm running for Senator from MI, and I want my tax dollars from MI spent here in MI."
0:27

El-Sayed not-so-subtly shades Mallory McMorrow. "Never taken money from AIPAC, never would take money from AIPAC, never wrote a position paper for AIPAC, never went on a trip funded by AIPAC… I'm running for Senator from MI, and I want my tax dollars from MI spent here in MI."

gato fumante

38,333 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

AIPAC is so desperate because it’s hated by everyone that it’s mass hiding posts. 😂🤣 Do me a favor and keep posting my Haley Stevens video on their post denying they hide money. (Open the below post and you’ll see it).
0:47

AIPAC is so desperate because it’s hated by everyone that it’s mass hiding posts. 😂🤣 Do me a favor and keep posting my Haley Stevens video on their post denying they hide money. (Open the below post and you’ll see it).

GenXGirl

41,084 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Michigan Voter: I'm not voting for anybody who takes money from AIPAC. CNN: Why is that? MV: Because the money should be spent here, not over there.
0:35

Michigan Voter: I'm not voting for anybody who takes money from AIPAC. CNN: Why is that? MV: Because the money should be spent here, not over there.

Acyn

772,502 просмотров • 15 дней назад

🔥“Every time I come on CNN you guys ask me the same questions.” Dr. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed deftly handles Jake Tapper 🦅 as he plays defense attorney for 🇮🇱 + AIPAC-backed Haley Stevens — even implying calling out $50 MILLION from special interests = Trump’s assault on our democracy 🤔
5:03

🔥“Every time I come on CNN you guys ask me the same questions.” Dr. Dr. Abdul El-Sayed deftly handles Jake Tapper 🦅 as he plays defense attorney for 🇮🇱 + AIPAC-backed Haley Stevens — even implying calling out $50 MILLION from special interests = Trump’s assault on our democracy 🤔

The Tennessee Holler

55,005 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Texas State Representative James Talarico: “I've never taken money from AIPAC, and I'm not taking money from AIPAC in this campaign. Seeing what's happening in Gaza makes me sick to my stomach as a teacher, as a Christian, as a human being.”
1:12

Texas State Representative James Talarico: “I've never taken money from AIPAC, and I'm not taking money from AIPAC in this campaign. Seeing what's happening in Gaza makes me sick to my stomach as a teacher, as a Christian, as a human being.”

The Resonance

512,507 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Hunt: When you said that you hope that AIPAC could teach Stevens how to string two coherent sentences together. Do you regret how you phrased that at all? Is that the right way to put it? El-Sayed: Obviously, she is really smart, which is why it's so surprising that whenever you ask her why she's taking $30 million from AIPAC, where her money comes from—she struggles to explain. I just think it's really important for us to get a clear explanation of where that money is coming from and what she's promised to these corporations and super PACS, including AIPAC, about what she plans to do for them when she's in office.
1:31

Hunt: When you said that you hope that AIPAC could teach Stevens how to string two coherent sentences together. Do you regret how you phrased that at all? Is that the right way to put it? El-Sayed: Obviously, she is really smart, which is why it's so surprising that whenever you ask her why she's taking $30 million from AIPAC, where her money comes from—she struggles to explain. I just think it's really important for us to get a clear explanation of where that money is coming from and what she's promised to these corporations and super PACS, including AIPAC, about what she plans to do for them when she's in office.

Acyn

235,139 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Haley Stevens is the biggest recipient of Israel lobby dark money in the 2026 election. 54 Separate Campaigns have been launched for her by the Pro-Israel Network. AIPAC claims they’re just random Americans supporting candidates of their choice. IF SO, WHY ARE YOU HIDING?
1:23

Haley Stevens is the biggest recipient of Israel lobby dark money in the 2026 election. 54 Separate Campaigns have been launched for her by the Pro-Israel Network. AIPAC claims they’re just random Americans supporting candidates of their choice. IF SO, WHY ARE YOU HIDING?

GenXGirl

86,022 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"Haley Stevens has NOT been endorsed by President Obama, but AIPAC is spending millions of dollars to deceive Michigan voters into thinking exactly that." "An ad featuring Obama supporting Stevens has been boosted by an enormous amount of Dark Money, even though Obama has publicly said he has not endorsed in this race. Lock in, Michigan!" - via Head in the Office
1:06

"Haley Stevens has NOT been endorsed by President Obama, but AIPAC is spending millions of dollars to deceive Michigan voters into thinking exactly that." "An ad featuring Obama supporting Stevens has been boosted by an enormous amount of Dark Money, even though Obama has publicly said he has not endorsed in this race. Lock in, Michigan!" - via Head in the Office

AIPAC Tracker

20,507 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Democratic Senator gets put on the hot seat after Bill Maher asks if she would take AIPAC money. MAHER: “Would you take AIPAC money?” ELISSA SLOTKIN: “So, actually, it’s interesting. Long before October 7th, I stopped taking AIPAC money… because they were giving money to people who had been participating in January 6th.” MAHER: “Who was giving money?” SLOTKIN: “AIPAC. They give money to both Democrats and Republicans, and people who had been involved in inciting January 6th… And as someone who barricaded herself in her office on January 6th, I didn’t agree with that.” MAHER: “Convenient for you.” Stephen A. Smith raised doubts and pressed her with further questions:
2:26

Democratic Senator gets put on the hot seat after Bill Maher asks if she would take AIPAC money. MAHER: “Would you take AIPAC money?” ELISSA SLOTKIN: “So, actually, it’s interesting. Long before October 7th, I stopped taking AIPAC money… because they were giving money to people who had been participating in January 6th.” MAHER: “Who was giving money?” SLOTKIN: “AIPAC. They give money to both Democrats and Republicans, and people who had been involved in inciting January 6th… And as someone who barricaded herself in her office on January 6th, I didn’t agree with that.” MAHER: “Convenient for you.” Stephen A. Smith raised doubts and pressed her with further questions:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

858,681 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Tucker Carlson tells the AmericaFest audience that accepting money from AIPAC is an America-last policy and should not be labeled as antisemitism. He adds that in the last few months of his life, Charlie Kirk told him he was being falsely attacked for being antisemitic when speaking out against AIPAC.
1:07

Tucker Carlson tells the AmericaFest audience that accepting money from AIPAC is an America-last policy and should not be labeled as antisemitism. He adds that in the last few months of his life, Charlie Kirk told him he was being falsely attacked for being antisemitic when speaking out against AIPAC.

Shadow of Ezra

211,415 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"AIPAC is notorious for... hiding the fact they're spending the money. Guess what other industry also does that." From the new 'We're Not Kidding', Ben McKenzie explains to Mehdi Hasan why he's supporting Brad Lander for Congress.
2:38

"AIPAC is notorious for... hiding the fact they're spending the money. Guess what other industry also does that." From the new 'We're Not Kidding', Ben McKenzie explains to Mehdi Hasan why he's supporting Brad Lander for Congress.

Zeteo

43,299 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Roger Waters "America is not a democracy. You can buy the presidency. Donald Trump did & he buys it from AIPAC money, from oligarchal money & from donor money. The fact that you’re allowed to pour millions and millions into politics makes it impossible for it to be democratic"
0:36

Roger Waters "America is not a democracy. You can buy the presidency. Donald Trump did & he buys it from AIPAC money, from oligarchal money & from donor money. The fact that you’re allowed to pour millions and millions into politics makes it impossible for it to be democratic"

Sulaiman Ahmed

430,726 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

“You’ve taken a lot of money from AIPAC… Tell our viewers why you take that money.” Mehdi Hasan presses Senator Mark Warner on how he can prove that it doesn’t affect his votes and position on Israel.
2:47

“You’ve taken a lot of money from AIPAC… Tell our viewers why you take that money.” Mehdi Hasan presses Senator Mark Warner on how he can prove that it doesn’t affect his votes and position on Israel.

Zeteo

34,180 просмотров • 25 дней назад

🚨EXCLUSIVE — Abigail Spanberger staffer CAUGHT on hidden camera! "Yes, she's taken, like, AIPAC money!" "Should I not have told you that? Are you wearing a wire?" "I'm not optimistic...I just have to believe she's gonna win..."
0:34

🚨EXCLUSIVE — Abigail Spanberger staffer CAUGHT on hidden camera! "Yes, she's taken, like, AIPAC money!" "Should I not have told you that? Are you wearing a wire?" "I'm not optimistic...I just have to believe she's gonna win..."

Townhall.com

158,199 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

It’s becoming clearer and clearer that AIPAC is doing everything they can to keep me out of the top two & secure a win for Scott Wiener in November. First we heard reports that an AIPAC affiliated group is dumping $475k into this race at the last minute to keep me out of the general. And now, according to multiple sources, a pro-Israel donor said Scott Wiener admitted to lying about his stance on the genocide in Gaza for political points. Scott will say and do anything to get into office, and so will the AIPAC lobby that’s backing him. In a general head-to-head, I'm tied with Scott Wiener in the polls, which means we could win this in November and send someone to Congress that will actually fight to end AIPAC and corporate money in our politics. The era of corporate Democrats that lie to voters is over. San Francisco, make sure you vote on June 2nd.
0:32

It’s becoming clearer and clearer that AIPAC is doing everything they can to keep me out of the top two & secure a win for Scott Wiener in November. First we heard reports that an AIPAC affiliated group is dumping $475k into this race at the last minute to keep me out of the general. And now, according to multiple sources, a pro-Israel donor said Scott Wiener admitted to lying about his stance on the genocide in Gaza for political points. Scott will say and do anything to get into office, and so will the AIPAC lobby that’s backing him. In a general head-to-head, I'm tied with Scott Wiener in the polls, which means we could win this in November and send someone to Congress that will actually fight to end AIPAC and corporate money in our politics. The era of corporate Democrats that lie to voters is over. San Francisco, make sure you vote on June 2nd.

Saikat Chakrabarti

59,199 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

JoyReidShow (2/23/2026): when asked if the DCCC will require their candidates to not take AIPAC or Big Tech money Lauren Underwood "You will have to ask those candidates about that. We don't have that kind of litmus test at the DCCC"
1:27

JoyReidShow (2/23/2026): when asked if the DCCC will require their candidates to not take AIPAC or Big Tech money Lauren Underwood "You will have to ask those candidates about that. We don't have that kind of litmus test at the DCCC"

CaseStudyQB

84,638 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

MODERATOR NY-13 DEBATE: The question was: Is AIPAC spending on your behalf, and do you denounce super PACs? REP. ADRIANO ESPAILLAT: My values are those of the people that I represent. They tell me how to vote. MODERATOR: But do you denounce super PACs? DARIALIZA AVILA CHEVALIER: Well, I find it astounding that he has not noted that he has received over $670,000 in direct contributions from AIPAC.
2:16

MODERATOR NY-13 DEBATE: The question was: Is AIPAC spending on your behalf, and do you denounce super PACs? REP. ADRIANO ESPAILLAT: My values are those of the people that I represent. They tell me how to vote. MODERATOR: But do you denounce super PACs? DARIALIZA AVILA CHEVALIER: Well, I find it astounding that he has not noted that he has received over $670,000 in direct contributions from AIPAC.

Drop Site

69,791 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Anabel Mendoza has called out several of her rivals during a heated Democratic candidate debate for Congress, raising questions about AIPAC campaign funding and political influence. Speaking on stage, Mendoza said she would never accept money from corporate PACs or AIPAC, adding that other candidates in the race were funded by powerful interests rather than voters. She named Melissa Conyers Irvin for taking AIPAC-linked money and called on her to resign from her role as city treasurer, criticising her record in office. Mendoza also referenced Jason Friedman, who did not attend the debate, saying he was also taking AIPAC-aligned funding. The debate comes as several Democrats compete for their party’s nomination in a closely watched congressional race.
0:45

Anabel Mendoza has called out several of her rivals during a heated Democratic candidate debate for Congress, raising questions about AIPAC campaign funding and political influence. Speaking on stage, Mendoza said she would never accept money from corporate PACs or AIPAC, adding that other candidates in the race were funded by powerful interests rather than voters. She named Melissa Conyers Irvin for taking AIPAC-linked money and called on her to resign from her role as city treasurer, criticising her record in office. Mendoza also referenced Jason Friedman, who did not attend the debate, saying he was also taking AIPAC-aligned funding. The debate comes as several Democrats compete for their party’s nomination in a closely watched congressional race.

Middle East Eye

44,227 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Full scale propaganda war on evangelical Christians. I don’t need AIPAC to tell me anything about being a Christian. I get all I need from this book you may have heard of it, it’s called the Bible.
0:27

Full scale propaganda war on evangelical Christians. I don’t need AIPAC to tell me anything about being a Christian. I get all I need from this book you may have heard of it, it’s called the Bible.

Insurrection Barbie

43,777 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад