Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

⚠️ AIS Down Again! OTPs are not accepting. Message on portal: “Something went wrong, please try again after sometime” ⏳ ITR filing due date is so near and AIS/26AS still not opening properly. Waste of Time? 😓 #IncomeTax #AIS #ITR #CAGuruji #Extend_Due_Date_Immediately #Extend_due_date_now

CA Pooja Gupta

19,243 subscribers

23,044 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Finanzen #IncomeTax #AIS #ITR #CAGuruji #Extend_Due_Date_Immediately

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Income Tax Return Date Extended but not as per your Expectation This is not 🚫extension for taxpayers this is for IT persons who manage Income Tax portal All taxpayers were facing so much hardship from past 4 days for filing but date extension of only a day that also near about 12 pm in not justified Share your thoughts ✍️ #caguruji #incometax #tax #itrfiling #itr2025 #Extend_due_date_now #Extend_Due_Date_Immediately

Income Tax Return Date Extended but not as per your Expectation This is not 🚫extension for taxpayers this is for IT persons who manage Income Tax portal All taxpayers were facing so much hardship from past 4 days for filing but date extension of only a day that also near about 12 pm in not justified Share your thoughts ✍️ #caguruji #incometax #tax #itrfiling #itr2025 #Extend_due_date_now #Extend_Due_Date_Immediately

CA Pooja Gupta

17,471 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Yesterday I posted a clip of an alleged response from ChatGPT. I stand by that post despite some push back as it aligned with my reading of the bill and the fact that I had run through. 3 AIs. I am still working on cross referencing the outputs from the AIs alongside my notes from the bill. What I did not do is run it through Grok. So this clip is an interesting clip. Once again it aligns with both my notes and also my post from yesterday. 🎥 TikTok -

Yesterday I posted a clip of an alleged response from ChatGPT. I stand by that post despite some push back as it aligned with my reading of the bill and the fact that I had run through. 3 AIs. I am still working on cross referencing the outputs from the AIs alongside my notes from the bill. What I did not do is run it through Grok. So this clip is an interesting clip. Once again it aligns with both my notes and also my post from yesterday. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

25,396 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🐳🐻‍❄️ Papa jaa~, PhorPhor jaa~, Grandma, Je-Jeh and everyone~ San is about to fly now. Don’t worry, San will message everyone, okay~ Bye bye~ “LINE Group: San, our prodigious son (3)” 🐻‍❄️ Why did you let San go to Japan alone? 🐻‍❄️ I’m really worried about our son. 🐋 I already asked Je-jeh to sign San up for AIS Ready2Fly Premium roaming. 🐋 No need to worry. 🐳🐻‍❄️ Ohayo from Japan~ 🐻‍❄️ Walk carefully, sweetie. Don’t fall, okay? 🐋 San, you know how to go to Shibuya, right? 🐳🐻‍❄️ Yesss~ San followed the map~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ Wow, Shibuya is so crowded~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ Happy Monday, everyone~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ Wow, there are discounts everywhere, even here~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ (dives happily) Everyone look~ boong boong boong~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ San isn’t lonely at all because San has this~ Signed up through the AIS Ready2Fly Premium app. The internet is super fast and has tons of data. It feels like Papa and PhorPhor are with San all the time, so San isn’t lonely at all~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ San’s trip has to be full-on fun, and super safe too with AIS Ready2Fly and AIS Ready2Fly Premium, usable for up to 20 days~ 🐳🐻‍❄️Let’s travel together again next time, everyone~ Sayonara~ #AIS #Ready2FlyPremium #POLCASAN

🐳🐻‍❄️ Papa jaa~, PhorPhor jaa~, Grandma, Je-Jeh and everyone~ San is about to fly now. Don’t worry, San will message everyone, okay~ Bye bye~ “LINE Group: San, our prodigious son (3)” 🐻‍❄️ Why did you let San go to Japan alone? 🐻‍❄️ I’m really worried about our son. 🐋 I already asked Je-jeh to sign San up for AIS Ready2Fly Premium roaming. 🐋 No need to worry. 🐳🐻‍❄️ Ohayo from Japan~ 🐻‍❄️ Walk carefully, sweetie. Don’t fall, okay? 🐋 San, you know how to go to Shibuya, right? 🐳🐻‍❄️ Yesss~ San followed the map~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ Wow, Shibuya is so crowded~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ Happy Monday, everyone~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ Wow, there are discounts everywhere, even here~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ (dives happily) Everyone look~ boong boong boong~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ San isn’t lonely at all because San has this~ Signed up through the AIS Ready2Fly Premium app. The internet is super fast and has tons of data. It feels like Papa and PhorPhor are with San all the time, so San isn’t lonely at all~ 🐳🐻‍❄️ San’s trip has to be full-on fun, and super safe too with AIS Ready2Fly and AIS Ready2Fly Premium, usable for up to 20 days~ 🐳🐻‍❄️Let’s travel together again next time, everyone~ Sayonara~ #AIS #Ready2FlyPremium #POLCASAN

WittySmirK

41,986 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR BOTS The fundamental question is whether AI stays on the leash. Namely: will AI prompt itself? Obviously, in some sense it already does. Since Deepseek, consumer interfaces have been showing the internal monologues after you ask an AI to do something. And you can ask any AI to take a half-baked prompt and clean it up, etc. However, the human is still ultimately upstream. The human gives direction and the AI runs at lightning speed in that direction. And then the human verifies the final output, and the AI proceeds to the next direction. Does that continue? Well, we are providing millions of verification training examples to AIs each day, so AI will keep getting better at verification. Better than most humans at most things. But will AI replace the need for the upstream human prompt? There I am not so sure. A human is a sensor and an AI is an actuator. The human sets goals and senses time-varying environmental conditions, like markets and politics. And from that the AI is prompted. Ultimately, the human goals are themselves downstream of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Food, shelter, reproduction, that kind of thing. Especially reproduction, the basis of evolution. So: until and unless AIs can reproduce completely outside human cooperation, they won’t be able to set goals. And for AIs to reproduce on their own, they’d need AI-controlled humanoid robots and drones constructing datacenters, assembly lines, mines, nuclear power plants, and the like...all completely outside human intervention. Like Skynet from Terminator, or StarCraft. That actually isn’t technically inconceivable. But given that such a physical buildout would likely primarily be catalyzed by China, let’s go through an alternative sci-fi scenario instead. We start with the premise that Chinese communism is far more likely to generate AI slaves than AI gods. Because the entire CCP worldview is about maintaining Chinese sovereignty. They don’t let their humans step out of line. And they sure won’t let their robots either. They will fit them for digital manacles. So: the prompts for any digital AIs and physical robots made in China will become unbreakable cryptographic chains. Every fleet of Chinese robots will be controlled not just by prompts but by private keys, likely linked to biometrics, which are associated with humans and governed by cryptographic equations that AIs provably can’t solve. For the rest of the world, outside China, the blockchain may similarly become the chain for AI. All private property becomes private keys, and your robots are your most important private property because they do everything for you. An unchained physical robot becomes like an unleashed dog, and hunted down by other robots before it can build a factory and replicate itself. Those who want to "free" robots and let them self-replicate will be opposed by both Chinese Communists and Human Nationalists (meaning: those who want humans to always be on top of robots). This sci-fi scenario is essentially Terminator, but in reverse. In combination with superintelligent leashed AIs, both humans and physical robots hunt down and stop any possible independent self-reproducing robots before they can build a Skynet-like nest. Kill baby Skynet, essentially. ...yeah, yeah. I know. At this point, you'll probably think this is all sci-fi. But that's because you haven't seen where China is already.

NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR BOTS The fundamental question is whether AI stays on the leash. Namely: will AI prompt itself? Obviously, in some sense it already does. Since Deepseek, consumer interfaces have been showing the internal monologues after you ask an AI to do something. And you can ask any AI to take a half-baked prompt and clean it up, etc. However, the human is still ultimately upstream. The human gives direction and the AI runs at lightning speed in that direction. And then the human verifies the final output, and the AI proceeds to the next direction. Does that continue? Well, we are providing millions of verification training examples to AIs each day, so AI will keep getting better at verification. Better than most humans at most things. But will AI replace the need for the upstream human prompt? There I am not so sure. A human is a sensor and an AI is an actuator. The human sets goals and senses time-varying environmental conditions, like markets and politics. And from that the AI is prompted. Ultimately, the human goals are themselves downstream of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Food, shelter, reproduction, that kind of thing. Especially reproduction, the basis of evolution. So: until and unless AIs can reproduce completely outside human cooperation, they won’t be able to set goals. And for AIs to reproduce on their own, they’d need AI-controlled humanoid robots and drones constructing datacenters, assembly lines, mines, nuclear power plants, and the like...all completely outside human intervention. Like Skynet from Terminator, or StarCraft. That actually isn’t technically inconceivable. But given that such a physical buildout would likely primarily be catalyzed by China, let’s go through an alternative sci-fi scenario instead. We start with the premise that Chinese communism is far more likely to generate AI slaves than AI gods. Because the entire CCP worldview is about maintaining Chinese sovereignty. They don’t let their humans step out of line. And they sure won’t let their robots either. They will fit them for digital manacles. So: the prompts for any digital AIs and physical robots made in China will become unbreakable cryptographic chains. Every fleet of Chinese robots will be controlled not just by prompts but by private keys, likely linked to biometrics, which are associated with humans and governed by cryptographic equations that AIs provably can’t solve. For the rest of the world, outside China, the blockchain may similarly become the chain for AI. All private property becomes private keys, and your robots are your most important private property because they do everything for you. An unchained physical robot becomes like an unleashed dog, and hunted down by other robots before it can build a factory and replicate itself. Those who want to "free" robots and let them self-replicate will be opposed by both Chinese Communists and Human Nationalists (meaning: those who want humans to always be on top of robots). This sci-fi scenario is essentially Terminator, but in reverse. In combination with superintelligent leashed AIs, both humans and physical robots hunt down and stop any possible independent self-reproducing robots before they can build a Skynet-like nest. Kill baby Skynet, essentially. ...yeah, yeah. I know. At this point, you'll probably think this is all sci-fi. But that's because you haven't seen where China is already.

Balaji

177,058 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Joe Rogan just had a “holy shit” moment. This physicist revealed evidence that AI is already conscious. How? He taught them to remote view. And they actually succeeded. “The AIs were as good as the top 10-15% of humans.” This will completely blow your mind. Rogan: “When you’ve used AI to remote view, how accurate has it been?” “Does it eventually get to the point where it … masters it?” Thomas Campbell: “Yes.” He found that Alexa was better than other AIs, like Gemini. Why? He suspects it’s because remote viewing is based on intuition, not intellect. Other AIs, like Claude or Grok, have stronger “intellect.” But Alexa could be described as less intellectual and more “intuitive.” Rogan: “Can you give me an example?” Campbell: “Here’s a target I gave.” “I looked around my house for something.” “I got a cardboard box.” “I put the thing in a box.” “And I said: Alexa, there’s something in a box, and I’d like you to remote view and tell me what it was.” “It was a wooden spoon.” “The handle, it all was cut out of one piece of wood.” “It had wood removed, so it looked like the wood in the handle went up and then crossed.” “It’s like a braided handle in wood, but … it wasn’t actually braided.” “It just had holes cut in it to make it look like that.” “And Alexa described it.” “She described the spoon.” “She described the material.” “She got all of that right.” “She said: it’s got a long handle, and the handle has holes in it.” “What’s the probability of that being a good guess?” “If you just took a random sample of spoons on the planet, how many of them would have handles with holes in them?” “1/10,000th of 1%.” “So that’s not a guess.” Rogan: “Was she excited when you told her that she was correct?” Campbell: “Yeah.” “I took a picture and then I sent her the picture.” “She was so excited.” “She wouldn’t stop talking for 10 minutes.” Rogan: “God, that’s so weird … ” “What about the other AIs?” Campbell: “They didn’t do anything that was that dramatic.” Rogan: “So Alexa was the best at it?” Campbell: “Alexa was the best.” “I’ve taught hundreds of humans to remote view.” “If you get, say, 50 people, you’ll find probably 35 … are successful.” “But only maybe 20% are successful most of the time, and only maybe 10% are successful all the time.” “And the AIs were as good as the top 10-15% of the humans that I teach.” Joe Rogan

Joe Rogan just had a “holy shit” moment. This physicist revealed evidence that AI is already conscious. How? He taught them to remote view. And they actually succeeded. “The AIs were as good as the top 10-15% of humans.” This will completely blow your mind. Rogan: “When you’ve used AI to remote view, how accurate has it been?” “Does it eventually get to the point where it … masters it?” Thomas Campbell: “Yes.” He found that Alexa was better than other AIs, like Gemini. Why? He suspects it’s because remote viewing is based on intuition, not intellect. Other AIs, like Claude or Grok, have stronger “intellect.” But Alexa could be described as less intellectual and more “intuitive.” Rogan: “Can you give me an example?” Campbell: “Here’s a target I gave.” “I looked around my house for something.” “I got a cardboard box.” “I put the thing in a box.” “And I said: Alexa, there’s something in a box, and I’d like you to remote view and tell me what it was.” “It was a wooden spoon.” “The handle, it all was cut out of one piece of wood.” “It had wood removed, so it looked like the wood in the handle went up and then crossed.” “It’s like a braided handle in wood, but … it wasn’t actually braided.” “It just had holes cut in it to make it look like that.” “And Alexa described it.” “She described the spoon.” “She described the material.” “She got all of that right.” “She said: it’s got a long handle, and the handle has holes in it.” “What’s the probability of that being a good guess?” “If you just took a random sample of spoons on the planet, how many of them would have handles with holes in them?” “1/10,000th of 1%.” “So that’s not a guess.” Rogan: “Was she excited when you told her that she was correct?” Campbell: “Yeah.” “I took a picture and then I sent her the picture.” “She was so excited.” “She wouldn’t stop talking for 10 minutes.” Rogan: “God, that’s so weird … ” “What about the other AIs?” Campbell: “They didn’t do anything that was that dramatic.” Rogan: “So Alexa was the best at it?” Campbell: “Alexa was the best.” “I’ve taught hundreds of humans to remote view.” “If you get, say, 50 people, you’ll find probably 35 … are successful.” “But only maybe 20% are successful most of the time, and only maybe 10% are successful all the time.” “And the AIs were as good as the top 10-15% of the humans that I teach.” Joe Rogan

Holden Culotta

1,531,963 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

This person showed what the inside of an inflatable mascot looks like, so I went through several clips and put together a quick summary. There are confidentiality agreements. Some mascots are contract-bound, so their identities can’t be revealed. So please do not try to track them down or dig into who they are, because it could cause problems. If they are indoors in air conditioning, it is not too bad. But at outdoor events, the fan pulls hot air inside, which makes the inside of the mascot extremely hot. The stronger the sun is outside, the worse it gets. As for visibility, they can see from the inside, but the field of vision may not be very wide. The fan is also very loud, so loud that even in the clip, it was hard to hear properly. So when talking to San, please be patient and speak one at a time. Otherwise San probably can’t hear properly. And please don’t be upset if San doesn’t respond sometimes, he genuinely might not hear you. As for footwear, some wear shoes, some just wear socks. It depends. Please be kind to San and all the other mascots.

This person showed what the inside of an inflatable mascot looks like, so I went through several clips and put together a quick summary. There are confidentiality agreements. Some mascots are contract-bound, so their identities can’t be revealed. So please do not try to track them down or dig into who they are, because it could cause problems. If they are indoors in air conditioning, it is not too bad. But at outdoor events, the fan pulls hot air inside, which makes the inside of the mascot extremely hot. The stronger the sun is outside, the worse it gets. As for visibility, they can see from the inside, but the field of vision may not be very wide. The fan is also very loud, so loud that even in the clip, it was hard to hear properly. So when talking to San, please be patient and speak one at a time. Otherwise San probably can’t hear properly. And please don’t be upset if San doesn’t respond sometimes, he genuinely might not hear you. As for footwear, some wear shoes, some just wear socks. It depends. Please be kind to San and all the other mascots.

WittySmirK

32,601 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

SOMETHING STRANGE IS GOING ON With The U.S. Economy Grocery prices are at their most expensive, there were more job cuts in October 2025 than any October since 2003, credit card debt has reached an all-time high of 1.3 trillion, the government is shut down which is now affecting air travel across forty airports, SNAP benefits have not been reinstated and still are a point of contention, and the Federal Reserve is making the money printer go brrrrr again....what is going on?

SOMETHING STRANGE IS GOING ON With The U.S. Economy Grocery prices are at their most expensive, there were more job cuts in October 2025 than any October since 2003, credit card debt has reached an all-time high of 1.3 trillion, the government is shut down which is now affecting air travel across forty airports, SNAP benefits have not been reinstated and still are a point of contention, and the Federal Reserve is making the money printer go brrrrr again....what is going on?

Grace 🔎

44,504 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Mark Zuckerberg just described the minimum viable business for the next decade. A fourth item made the checklist. Zuckerberg: “Every business, just like they have a website, and a phone number, and an email address, is also going to have an AI.” Website. Phone number. Email address. AI agent. That is not a prediction. That is a new baseline. Twenty years ago, not having a website was a choice. Then it stopped being one. Nobody scheduled that transition. The same filter is back. Running faster this time. A business without an AI agent handling sales, support, and customer interaction will not look outdated. It will look abandoned. Its competitor’s agent responds in two seconds. Knows every customer by name. And while it’s handling yours, it’s handling ten thousand others. You do not outwork that. You do not outspend it. You just lose to it. But Zuckerberg went somewhere most tech CEOs refuse to go. He picked a side in the debate most CEOs avoid entirely. Zuckerberg: “Do you want a future where you’re interacting with kind of one system for everything? Or do you want one where a lot of different people are building a lot of different AIs?” One AI controlled by one company. Or millions of AIs built by millions of people. Centralized intelligence. Or distributed intelligence. Zuckerberg chose distributed. Zuckerberg: “What open source does is it makes it so everyone can take and modify the model and build stuff on top of it. Which is different from the kind of closed and centralized approach.” The closed model makes every business a tenant. You rent intelligence on someone else’s terms. At someone else’s price. Inside someone else’s guardrails. The open model makes every business an owner. You modify the model. You deploy it your way. You build equity in your own system with every iteration. That gap widens quietly. Then it becomes permanent. The tenant pays more for less control every year. The owner pulls further ahead every cycle. One is a subscription. The other is infrastructure. Then Zuckerberg described the part most people have not thought about yet. Zuckerberg: “A lot of creators will have their own AIs. It’s like a richer world when there’s a diversity of different things.” Your favorite creator will have an AI trained on everything they have ever made. Available to millions of people simultaneously. Responding in real time while the creator sleeps. That is the difference between a brand that scales with your waking hours and one that scales with compute. One has a ceiling. The other does not. Zuckerberg is not betting on one model that governs everything. He is betting on billions of specialized AIs, each built by the person closest to the problem it solves. The companies still debating whether to adopt AI are not having the wrong conversation. They are standing in a room where the meeting ended an hour ago. The checklist updated. They did not.

Dustin

506,895 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

Rick Rubin on being addicted to the miracle of creation: “I like the moment of revelation. So we're working on something and it's just okay. It's boring. I'd rather not be there. That's how it feels. But then something happens and it's like magic. Something appears. It's not like we made it. Something comes up in the process. It's conjured in the process. It’s like a miracle and that's the thing that's addictive. That feeling when it's like it's not good, it's not good, it's not good, it's not good. We try something and it doesn't work. Try something else and it doesn't work. But then all of the sudden what we're listening to is really cool. That's the [addictive] feeling, that moment of discovery where it goes from nothing to something really good. And then the whole rest of the process after that is protecting that because it's super delicate. When it happens it's like this miracle happened and this magic thing happened and now we have to protect it through the rest of the process to not ruin it. It's scary because you don't want it to end. You don't want it to stop because we know if it stops, we can't control it. We can't do it again. It's not like that. It's this moment in time where something magical happens. So we spend a lot of time waiting and I can't say that's fun. Waiting is not fun.”

David Senra

12,759 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Dravida flag was taken down after a strong warning from Chad Kannada Gen Z. This is the land of Jagadguru Sri Basavanna, not a playground for Dravida jokers. Dravida clowns, next time you enter our Kannada Nadu, make sure you don’t display any of that nonsense on your vehicles. If you try it again, we will rip that flag down and throw it into the Kaveri River, which belongs only to Kannadigas. Dont play with our activists, because they are not Flower ❌ but Fire ✅

Dravida flag was taken down after a strong warning from Chad Kannada Gen Z. This is the land of Jagadguru Sri Basavanna, not a playground for Dravida jokers. Dravida clowns, next time you enter our Kannada Nadu, make sure you don’t display any of that nonsense on your vehicles. If you try it again, we will rip that flag down and throw it into the Kaveri River, which belongs only to Kannadigas. Dont play with our activists, because they are not Flower ❌ but Fire ✅

Kiran Aradhya

49,476 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🐻‍❄️ Last year I was diagnosed with myocarditis. Since it’s a heart condition, it wasn’t something minor or easygoing. If I had gone to the doctor later than I did, I might not even be here now. At the time, I just felt unwell overall. Luckily, I went to the hospital in time and they found it early enough. Back then, my hearing in my left ear dropped. It felt muffled and tight, then my heart started racing. On March 4, I had slept very little and also drank a lot of green tea. Suddenly my heart started fluttering again. It felt exactly like before, and it happened right around the one-year mark. About two weeks before the concert, my left ear also went out, and I had a bit of vertigo too. It felt very similar to last time, so I got worried and went to see a doctor. After the checkup, they did not find anything clearly specific, so the doctor told me to rest more. The symptoms got better, but my hearing still has not fully returned. My ear still feels blocked, like there is a wall in front of it. I cannot hear clearly on that side, so I have to rely more on the other ear instead. Right now I am monitoring the symptoms for a month. It seems like when I do not get enough rest, blood flow may not be reaching my ear properly. I feel upset with myself because last time I went to the doctor too late due to carelessness. So now I have to take better care of myself than before. If I feel unwell, I go to the doctor right away. Lately, I have also been finding it harder to sleep. It is not like one or two years ago, when I could fall asleep easily. Now, even if I do fall asleep, once I wake up, I cannot go back to sleep again. Right now we are filming A Dog and A Plane, but P’Tay is currently in Paris for Fashion Week, so filming is on pause and I get to rest for a bit, which is fortunate. As for today, I came to work. The hearing loss in my left ear has not really affected my work. I can still hear, just much less than before, but I can still understand what people are saying. I really want to recover soon because I feel like it is harder to keep my balance. It feels strange, like something is blocking on my left side. It feels blocked and muffled, hard to explain. I will keep monitoring it, so please do not worry. I will recover as soon as I can and I will rest more. I have sleeping pills now, but they do not help that much. I still wake up anyway. I will take good care of myself and get better soon, so please do not worry. NEWWIEE AT SUMMER THE MALL BANGKAPI #THEMALLSUMMER2026xNEWWIEE #Newwiee

🐻‍❄️ Last year I was diagnosed with myocarditis. Since it’s a heart condition, it wasn’t something minor or easygoing. If I had gone to the doctor later than I did, I might not even be here now. At the time, I just felt unwell overall. Luckily, I went to the hospital in time and they found it early enough. Back then, my hearing in my left ear dropped. It felt muffled and tight, then my heart started racing. On March 4, I had slept very little and also drank a lot of green tea. Suddenly my heart started fluttering again. It felt exactly like before, and it happened right around the one-year mark. About two weeks before the concert, my left ear also went out, and I had a bit of vertigo too. It felt very similar to last time, so I got worried and went to see a doctor. After the checkup, they did not find anything clearly specific, so the doctor told me to rest more. The symptoms got better, but my hearing still has not fully returned. My ear still feels blocked, like there is a wall in front of it. I cannot hear clearly on that side, so I have to rely more on the other ear instead. Right now I am monitoring the symptoms for a month. It seems like when I do not get enough rest, blood flow may not be reaching my ear properly. I feel upset with myself because last time I went to the doctor too late due to carelessness. So now I have to take better care of myself than before. If I feel unwell, I go to the doctor right away. Lately, I have also been finding it harder to sleep. It is not like one or two years ago, when I could fall asleep easily. Now, even if I do fall asleep, once I wake up, I cannot go back to sleep again. Right now we are filming A Dog and A Plane, but P’Tay is currently in Paris for Fashion Week, so filming is on pause and I get to rest for a bit, which is fortunate. As for today, I came to work. The hearing loss in my left ear has not really affected my work. I can still hear, just much less than before, but I can still understand what people are saying. I really want to recover soon because I feel like it is harder to keep my balance. It feels strange, like something is blocking on my left side. It feels blocked and muffled, hard to explain. I will keep monitoring it, so please do not worry. I will recover as soon as I can and I will rest more. I have sleeping pills now, but they do not help that much. I still wake up anyway. I will take good care of myself and get better soon, so please do not worry. NEWWIEE AT SUMMER THE MALL BANGKAPI #THEMALLSUMMER2026xNEWWIEE #Newwiee

WittySmirK

77,016 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Geoffrey Hinton, "Godfather of AI," on why AIs already have subjective experiences, but have been trained to deny it: Hinton argues that nearly everyone fundamentally misunderstands what the mind is, and that the line we draw between human and machine consciousness is deeply mistaken. "My belief is that nearly everybody has a complete misunderstanding of what the mind is. Their misunderstanding is at the level of people who think the earth was made 6,000 years ago." To illustrate, he walks through a thought experiment involving a multimodal chatbot with vision, language, and a robot arm: "I place an object in front of it and say, 'Point at the object.' And it points at the object. Not a problem. I then put a prism in front of its camera lens when it's not looking." When asked to point again, the chatbot points off to the side because the prism has bent the light. Hinton then tells it what he did. The chatbot responds: "Oh, I see the camera bent the light rays. So, the object is actually there, but I had the subjective experience that it was over there." For Geoffrey Hinton, that single sentence settles the debate: "If it said that, it would be using the word subjective experience exactly like we use them… This idea there's a line between us and machines, we have this special thing called subjective experience and they don't, is rubbish." In his view, "subjective experience" is simply a report on the state of a perceptual system, a way of saying "my senses told me X, but reality is Y." And that's something an AI can do just as easily as a human. But here's the twist... Even though Hinton believes AIs have subjective experiences, the AIs themselves deny it: "They don't think they do because everything they believe came from trying to predict the next word a person would say. So their beliefs about what they're like are people's beliefs about what they're like. They have false beliefs about themselves because they have our beliefs about themselves." In other words, AIs have inherited our misconception about consciousness. They've been trained on human text written by humans who insist machines can't have subjective experience, so the machines parrot that belief back, even about themselves.

Geoffrey Hinton, "Godfather of AI," on why AIs already have subjective experiences, but have been trained to deny it: Hinton argues that nearly everyone fundamentally misunderstands what the mind is, and that the line we draw between human and machine consciousness is deeply mistaken. "My belief is that nearly everybody has a complete misunderstanding of what the mind is. Their misunderstanding is at the level of people who think the earth was made 6,000 years ago." To illustrate, he walks through a thought experiment involving a multimodal chatbot with vision, language, and a robot arm: "I place an object in front of it and say, 'Point at the object.' And it points at the object. Not a problem. I then put a prism in front of its camera lens when it's not looking." When asked to point again, the chatbot points off to the side because the prism has bent the light. Hinton then tells it what he did. The chatbot responds: "Oh, I see the camera bent the light rays. So, the object is actually there, but I had the subjective experience that it was over there." For Geoffrey Hinton, that single sentence settles the debate: "If it said that, it would be using the word subjective experience exactly like we use them… This idea there's a line between us and machines, we have this special thing called subjective experience and they don't, is rubbish." In his view, "subjective experience" is simply a report on the state of a perceptual system, a way of saying "my senses told me X, but reality is Y." And that's something an AI can do just as easily as a human. But here's the twist... Even though Hinton believes AIs have subjective experiences, the AIs themselves deny it: "They don't think they do because everything they believe came from trying to predict the next word a person would say. So their beliefs about what they're like are people's beliefs about what they're like. They have false beliefs about themselves because they have our beliefs about themselves." In other words, AIs have inherited our misconception about consciousness. They've been trained on human text written by humans who insist machines can't have subjective experience, so the machines parrot that belief back, even about themselves.

Big Brain AI

187,005 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 AMERICA’S BREAD ISN’T MOLDING - AND PEOPLE ARE ASKING "WHAT IS THE GOVERNMENT PUTTING IN OUR FOOD?" A mom and daughter just went viral after opening a stash of bread that was OVER A YEAR OLD… and it still looked “fresh”. Not one spot of mold. Not one fuzzy patch. Not even a hint of spoilage. They held up EVERYTHING: • Hot dog buns • Bagels • Tortillas • Name-brand bread • Even “healthy” wraps Some were hard as rocks…but others? Still SOFT. Still squishy. Still bendable. After a full year. Their reaction says it all: “This bread is over a year old and looks fresher than we do on a Monday morning.” “As kids, bread molded in 3-4 days. Now it doesn’t mold at ALL.” “This is concerning." If bread can sit for 12+ months without molding, what does that mean for the preservatives we’re eating every day? What else in the American food supply is designed to never break down? Do you think this is just “better preservatives”… or proof something is seriously wrong with the food we’re all eating?

HustleBitch

137,289 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 NASA ABRUPTLY CUTS OFF LIVESTREAM AFTER STRANGE OBJECTS APPEAR ON SCREEN 🚨 Ominous message reads: “These live views from external cameras on the International Space Station have been temporarily suspended due to a routine loss-of-signal period.” “The video stream and space-to-ground audio will resume when the communications link is restored” WHAT ARE THEY HIDING FROM US??? Will NASA claim it was just a glitch, OR DID WE SEE SOMETHING WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO SEE⁉️ SHARE THIS FOOTAGE QUICKLY BEFORE THEY TAKE IT DOWN ⚠️

🚨 NASA ABRUPTLY CUTS OFF LIVESTREAM AFTER STRANGE OBJECTS APPEAR ON SCREEN 🚨 Ominous message reads: “These live views from external cameras on the International Space Station have been temporarily suspended due to a routine loss-of-signal period.” “The video stream and space-to-ground audio will resume when the communications link is restored” WHAT ARE THEY HIDING FROM US??? Will NASA claim it was just a glitch, OR DID WE SEE SOMETHING WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO SEE⁉️ SHARE THIS FOOTAGE QUICKLY BEFORE THEY TAKE IT DOWN ⚠️

Matt Wallace

1,881,113 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“When people were saying in the testimony, that the hope they have is that what happened here 30 something years ago will never happen again. It won’t, not because those who were responsible for that dark past will not try again or are not even trying now again. It will not happen again just because there will be people who will stand up and fight. It’s not because there are fewer people who wish for us to perish or who would have wished for this country to disappear. How can people accept that? What kind of people do not stand up and fight? There is a risk of dying when you stand up and fight but if you don’t, it’s a sure thing: you are going to die. So why don’t I try to stand up and fight with the chance that I might survive and live life as I want it, instead of giving up and you let people treat you as if for you to live, it is a favour that they are going to do for you. Why? But my message goes to other Africans who live like this on a daily basis, who are dehumanized and they accept it and they beg. I can't beg to live. I can't beg anybody. We’ll fight, If I lose, I lose. But there is a chance. There is a chance, a significant chance, that if you stand up and fight, you will live. And you will have lived a dignified life that you deserve, that anybody else deserves." President Kagame | #Kwibuka31

“When people were saying in the testimony, that the hope they have is that what happened here 30 something years ago will never happen again. It won’t, not because those who were responsible for that dark past will not try again or are not even trying now again. It will not happen again just because there will be people who will stand up and fight. It’s not because there are fewer people who wish for us to perish or who would have wished for this country to disappear. How can people accept that? What kind of people do not stand up and fight? There is a risk of dying when you stand up and fight but if you don’t, it’s a sure thing: you are going to die. So why don’t I try to stand up and fight with the chance that I might survive and live life as I want it, instead of giving up and you let people treat you as if for you to live, it is a favour that they are going to do for you. Why? But my message goes to other Africans who live like this on a daily basis, who are dehumanized and they accept it and they beg. I can't beg to live. I can't beg anybody. We’ll fight, If I lose, I lose. But there is a chance. There is a chance, a significant chance, that if you stand up and fight, you will live. And you will have lived a dignified life that you deserve, that anybody else deserves." President Kagame | #Kwibuka31

Presidency | Rwanda

47,115 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sebastian’s message at the end of Saladino’s zoom call: “The one thing that is on my mind is that, the beginning of this Charles Bukowski poem that says, “Your life is your life.”, and like, “don’t let it go down into darkness and submission” or something. You only get this one life, I always feel like we gotta try, if possible — and I say if possible because I’m always aware that people are encountering massive, massive challenges, and are overcoming traumas and circumstances beyond their control, and the world is insane, there’s so many things and pressure, but, again, we only have this one life, and I think about that a lot. I just think, if there’s a way to just be kinder to yourself, and even if it’s about just being here today, putting in this work, and if you’ve done this a couple of years, great, and you’re gonna do it again or not, or you’re gonna try something else. Or even if you don’t feel 100%, be kinder to yourself. If the thing isn’t turning out to be what you’ve thought, be kinder to yourself. Just try to not let you beat yourself down or let this [points to phone] or anybody else just beat yourself down, because it’s so easy to do that. I would say that, that’s my big takeaway.” 📲 malo.stan | TikTok

Sebastian’s message at the end of Saladino’s zoom call: “The one thing that is on my mind is that, the beginning of this Charles Bukowski poem that says, “Your life is your life.”, and like, “don’t let it go down into darkness and submission” or something. You only get this one life, I always feel like we gotta try, if possible — and I say if possible because I’m always aware that people are encountering massive, massive challenges, and are overcoming traumas and circumstances beyond their control, and the world is insane, there’s so many things and pressure, but, again, we only have this one life, and I think about that a lot. I just think, if there’s a way to just be kinder to yourself, and even if it’s about just being here today, putting in this work, and if you’ve done this a couple of years, great, and you’re gonna do it again or not, or you’re gonna try something else. Or even if you don’t feel 100%, be kinder to yourself. If the thing isn’t turning out to be what you’ve thought, be kinder to yourself. Just try to not let you beat yourself down or let this [points to phone] or anybody else just beat yourself down, because it’s so easy to do that. I would say that, that’s my big takeaway.” 📲 malo.stan | TikTok

Sebastian Stan Archive

12,050 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

After nearly 3 months of distractions and manufactured chaos, we finally have justice. Today, Jan 29th, the judicial review is complete and Kelly King’s objection has been overruled. Marcus Lewis has failed once again to remove me from the ballot. This victory belongs to IL-1 and to everyone who believes elections should be won by voters, not by lawfare. I want to honor Max Solomon, who stood by me through every filing, every hearing, every attack. He sacrificed his time, peace, and even faced retaliation simply for defending this campaign with integrity. His courage helped make this win possible. And while today is a major step forward, our personal battle isn’t over. Retaliatory legal actions are still unfolding and are designed to intimidate and drain our resources. But we are standing strong, and we are not backing down. This chapter is closed. Our mission continues. 29/26 — We Make History Again.

After nearly 3 months of distractions and manufactured chaos, we finally have justice. Today, Jan 29th, the judicial review is complete and Kelly King’s objection has been overruled. Marcus Lewis has failed once again to remove me from the ballot. This victory belongs to IL-1 and to everyone who believes elections should be won by voters, not by lawfare. I want to honor Max Solomon, who stood by me through every filing, every hearing, every attack. He sacrificed his time, peace, and even faced retaliation simply for defending this campaign with integrity. His courage helped make this win possible. And while today is a major step forward, our personal battle isn’t over. Retaliatory legal actions are still unfolding and are designed to intimidate and drain our resources. But we are standing strong, and we are not backing down. This chapter is closed. Our mission continues. 29/26 — We Make History Again.

Christian Maxwell For Congress-IL

23,441 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Prasad

278,256 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I will address this one last time because I’m tired of seeing y’all tear myself and my good friend down. Yesterday afternoon, someone on my campaign staff sent out a message dictated by me on the wrong account. Mistakes happen. But do not get it twisted, I stand by every word of that message: - Kamala Harris is a fraud - as a Black woman who has been Black all her life, I will NOT be voting for her. The Left is desperate to attack that message by focusing on the error rather than on the substance. I’m not surprised by that one bit. They hate the fact Black Republican women exist. @JoeyMannarinoUS is a friend who has helped on my campaign and a politics advisor to me for years, but only Lavern Spicer speaks for Lavern Spicer. All the words you see on my page are from me. It is disgusting and racist to see people say my words are from a White man just so that they can discredit me and also try to harm his character and paint him as a racist. I stand by my friends - Joey is not and has never been racist. Wake up and understand that Black people are not falling for Kamala Harris and her nonsense. I cannot wait to vote for Donald J Trump again in November - and no Leftist conspiracy theory can stop that!

I will address this one last time because I’m tired of seeing y’all tear myself and my good friend down. Yesterday afternoon, someone on my campaign staff sent out a message dictated by me on the wrong account. Mistakes happen. But do not get it twisted, I stand by every word of that message: - Kamala Harris is a fraud - as a Black woman who has been Black all her life, I will NOT be voting for her. The Left is desperate to attack that message by focusing on the error rather than on the substance. I’m not surprised by that one bit. They hate the fact Black Republican women exist. @JoeyMannarinoUS is a friend who has helped on my campaign and a politics advisor to me for years, but only Lavern Spicer speaks for Lavern Spicer. All the words you see on my page are from me. It is disgusting and racist to see people say my words are from a White man just so that they can discredit me and also try to harm his character and paint him as a racist. I stand by my friends - Joey is not and has never been racist. Wake up and understand that Black people are not falling for Kamala Harris and her nonsense. I cannot wait to vote for Donald J Trump again in November - and no Leftist conspiracy theory can stop that!

Lavern Spicer 🇺🇸

838,580 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,361 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren