Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Alan Ritchson says Hollywood action space needs more everyday protagonists like Indiana Jones who was a professor not just military or ex-military heroes. Alan Ritchson: One thing I'm trying to do is hark back to the '90s, when you would get protagonists like Indiana Jones, who was a professor...

7,346,706 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Remote Viewer Just Exposed a SECRET Military War That No One Realizes Is Going On. No it's not the Iran War. No It's not the Gaza War.... It's an INVISIBLE WAR. Remote Viewer, Edward Riordan, exposes what's actually going on, that we are not aware of: ."..Was some object here flying across? It was in motion. Flying, zipping, moving, moving motion accelerating. Very fast speeds like a rubber bullet. It reminded me of just very fast moving." "The object itself was manmade. The notions here are like space travel technology and or weapons of war, flight or missile built in and for the same thing. So these are like military space weapon kind of stuff. Military and contractor budget facility. That was this place, a military contractor budget facility. And with these kinds of crafts, spacecrafts here or flying..." "...It was, a sense of advanced technology, space flight and weapons. But for what, though, I wonder? Stealth machines... How does this relate to the tasking though I questioned... A secret budget operation is what it felt designed for." "But what is it developed for, though? I pondered protecting, protection from enemies. See, this is where I get interesting protection from enemies seen and not seen." "Stealth level, even cloaked, even in remote flying. Meaning the pilot is on the ground in a VR simulator while the plane flies the mission. Is this what the target is all about? So I wonder, the testing of a system, a flying system protecting an unseen entity. This is case where stuff got very interesting. Here we're protecting an unseen entity, protecting the unseen. But what does that even mean, though, I wonder? And defense system designed and built for the unseen. For those who you are not to see or cannot see." "is all of that unseen seen surface at all theoretical in theory, a threat from an an interdimensional force and to protect the unseen from here?" "...Very sci fi, heavy on the defense. To fight off, an invisible or cloaked enemy...." "he signal was like that. The dark night, satellite thinking. Wow, this is really pretty wild. Wow... getting this notion here that this thing, that this invisible thing is going to bleed over from that world into this world.... seen as a continuation war or hostility factor in the world that people will continue to quote, seems as a continuation war or hostility factor in the world. People will continue to question, is it a real, is it a simulation? Do I need to be concerned? All their questions, the effects of this hostility don't seem to do much for the average person living out their lives. It affects them, but not in ways they can or will register directly. The main element remains hidden and or secret..."

Future Forecasting Group

19,006 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

New: Annie Jacobsen on Rogan "Extraterrestrial beings [are] certainly going to be a lot more [intelligent] than us. It wouldn't be visible to our spectrum." ~AJ "A lot of really legitimate-thinker people that didn't have an opinion about [UFOs] before, [are now] more open to the idea." ~AJ (Most of the full segment (cued up in the replies) is AJ expressing her skepticism, leaning towards government deception and disinformation, and her disinterest in the UFO subject. But this was interesting.) ~ Annie Jacobsen: "I find the most interesting concept is something that Jacques Vallée explained to me. This has to be a decade ago, where he said, 'The problem with UFOs is they're not a military problem; they're an intelligence-community problem,' for precisely the reason you're talking about. "Like, if you're actually talking about extraterrestrial beings, their certainly going to be a lot more [intelligent] than us, and certainly if they got here. And that's where I think a lot of that idea of invisibility. And again, that's like - I'm using the word poetically - comes up, right? That an extraterrestrial being would be, would be intel(ligent). You know, it wouldn't be visible to our spectrum. It's not like hardware, like military hardware." Rogan: "Right. What is your take on all these videos then, of these objects? You think these things are some top-secret military program?" AJ: "I mean, I've seen them, but again, I enter into it... You know, sometimes when you have a bias, and mine is certainly biased towards disinformation. So I'm just totally aware of it. And it's also...it's not that interesting to me. It just actually really isn't. I've got all these other serious interests. "But I do call up people I know who might have a more interesting take than me, who do not have the horse in the race of absolutely being convinced that aliens are among us. So, I would, for example, I'll call up fighter pilots and talk to them, or I'll talk to someone, an astronaut who is on the ISS, Jeff Ashby, who's married to my cousin Mary. "And it's interesting to hear them talk about the possibility. And these are people who do look at the objects more, also sometimes from their military-training background. And I will say that there has been a shift from 15, 18 years ago when I first wrote 'Area 51' and was reporting it, where it was definitely like a like a stigmatized subject. To a lot of really legitimate thinker people that didn't have an opinion about it before, being more open to the idea. And that kind of thing I find really interesting. Those are conversations I like having." Rogan: "Well, that really changed with the New York Times article, right?" AJ: "I don't know because I felt like that article was written by a lot of, and interviewed a lot of, people who already were very serious believers." Rogan: "Yes, but it was in the New York Times."

Joe Murgia

24,813 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says the left and right are converging: "The functional allies of our adversaries now, who claim to want these progressive things—both far-right and far-left, which are actually structurally very similar—are helping to fight for structures that would not include anyone like them." "I want a society where it is: the best people succeed." "There's a right of free speech, whether you like the person or not." "There's a right of privacy, whether you like the person or not." "There's a right to put checks on the government, whether they like you or not." "The people who are working the hardest to destroy those concepts, and are the most effective in destroying those concepts, call themselves progressive. They're not progressive. "Or they call themselves, super far right. They're not even right-wing." "The people on the far left, and the people I hung out with in the Frankfurt School, which was left of center of where I was—true progressives—would be somewhat not amused to know that the actual philosophical background of most modern non-progressive progressives is not Marx, it's Heidegger." "They're not actually left-wing. They're actually asking for things that are classically right-wing." "What are those things? They're asking for: we all get to be the same. We're all defined by who we are, by how we were born, or what we impute ourselves to be. There are only rights for a sector of people. The rights do not apply to people who are not like us because of wealth or because they think differently, and that we want a society that essentially looks communal." "These are like prototypical, non-progressive, classically right-wing thoughts just reapplied to people who call themselves progressive." "That's the society that Palantir and I are effectively working against." "By giving people more sovereignty, whether they believe it or not, protecting people from terrorism with civil liberties, by making businesses wealthier and better, where the businesses keep their actual alpha, and by helping Ukraine, Israel, and America establish a dominant position." Via Mathias Döpfner

Jawwwn

13,461 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen