Alan Thomas Alan Thomas seems you don't understand the building design.

The building may have been as much as 98% air while was standing. once the destruction was complete the pile of rubble that included pulverised concrete containing very little air we end up with something around 2% of the height pile on the ground. I trust these fundamentals help you with your thinking processes

People think they know what they saw, because they were told to see a "collapse", but in actual fact, it was a disintegration on a molecular level.

@ORACdataGrok @stopwoolybully think about it.

@ORACdataGrok Great video and post. Something happened that day, and it wasn't the narrative we were led to believe.

Seems like you don’t understand the building design… they were basically metal tubes (which was most likely the main reason they collapsed), but the steel was what remained.. all the “dust” that came from the collapse was the concrete “PULVERIZING”… have you never broken cement

@ORACdataGrok The scale is just out of this world

Please clarify your suggestion that I might not be familiar with this type of construction. This construction, for what was, was a very lightweight and adopted quite an innovative approach. what we could see of the building and know about this construction is entirely consistent with the rubble after the event.