Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 ALERT TELANGANA! Illegal immigrants( Rohingyas) entered pre-2014 without documents & settled across Hyderabad & every district. ✅ Land encroachments in Balapur, Royal Colony #CAA #NRC will identify & deport illegals **legally & fairly**—**no one above law! When Modi govt brings #CAA #NRC to DEPORT them, anti-national KhanGrace &...

vishnureddy_899's profile picture

విష్ణు వర్ధన్ రెడ్డి-विष्णु वर्धन रेड्डी🇮🇳

5,065 subscribers

95,314 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik#CAA#NRC
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨Spare Us the Outrage Theater: Republicans Could Deport Mamdani - and Won’t The media and GOP are suddenly “shocked” that Zohran Mamdani will be sworn in on the Quran - a book that is not a religious text, but a military manual for jihad. It contains at least 109 verses commanding war against non-Muslims for rejecting Islam — beheadings, terror, slaughter wherever they hide, and branding Muslims who refuse as hypocrites bound for Hell. Dozens of Democrats - Keith Ellison, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib - have already sworn on it, and nothing was done. Now, some so-called “Republicans” running for office and embedded in appointed positions are actively aligned with the same ideology - one irreconcilable with the U.S. Constitution. So no - the book isn’t the scandal - this is NOTHING new! 🚨THE REAL SCANDAL: Our party has allowed Radical anti-American Marxists and Jihadis to be embedded at every level of government, despising our history, laws, and people - and Republicans have done NOTHING to stop it. Worse: They don’t have to fight politically. They can stop it LEGALLY - and they refuse! The Law Is Clear. The Silence Is Criminal. Zohran Mamdani naturalized in 2018. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1451, citizenship MUST be revoked if procured by concealment/misrepresentation or affiliation with communist/terrorist groups within the statutory window. 🚨 Mamdani checks both boxes: • Publicly glorified the Holy Land Five - convicted on 108 counts of funneling millions to Hamas (designated terrorist org). Adjudicated fact. • Card-carrying Democratic Socialist of America (DSA) - largest U.S. Marxist group, aligned with foreign communists in Cuba, Europe, Asia, Latin America. • Expressed allegiance to India’s Communist Party inside the 5-year window. • Praised Hamas’s U.S. finance arm pre-oath. This is black-letter law. 🔺Supporting Hamas networks is material support for terrorism. 🔺Conceal that support during naturalization? Fraud. Join or affiliate after? Disqualification. 🔺Once citizenship is revoked, deportation is mandatory under INA § 212(a)(3)(B). And still - nothing! Rep. Andy Ogles formally referred Mamdani for denaturalization in June. Met AG Pam Bondi in July on “the New York situation.” Sent follow-up in October with new evidence. 🔺Result: Zero hearings, Zero action, Zero enforcement. The question isn’t whether the law exists - it’s whether this government will enforce it against Leftist ideological royalty. Will America allow a Hamas-aligned Marxist foreign national to hold office and weaponize our institutions against us - with impunity? The answer sits on Attorney General Pam Bondi’s desk. Until the law is enforced, RAIR will keep naming the threat: Denaturalize. Deport. Hold accountable. Stop TALKING, REPUBLICANS - DO SOMETHING!
2:57

🚨Spare Us the Outrage Theater: Republicans Could Deport Mamdani - and Won’t The media and GOP are suddenly “shocked” that Zohran Mamdani will be sworn in on the Quran - a book that is not a religious text, but a military manual for jihad. It contains at least 109 verses commanding war against non-Muslims for rejecting Islam — beheadings, terror, slaughter wherever they hide, and branding Muslims who refuse as hypocrites bound for Hell. Dozens of Democrats - Keith Ellison, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib - have already sworn on it, and nothing was done. Now, some so-called “Republicans” running for office and embedded in appointed positions are actively aligned with the same ideology - one irreconcilable with the U.S. Constitution. So no - the book isn’t the scandal - this is NOTHING new! 🚨THE REAL SCANDAL: Our party has allowed Radical anti-American Marxists and Jihadis to be embedded at every level of government, despising our history, laws, and people - and Republicans have done NOTHING to stop it. Worse: They don’t have to fight politically. They can stop it LEGALLY - and they refuse! The Law Is Clear. The Silence Is Criminal. Zohran Mamdani naturalized in 2018. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1451, citizenship MUST be revoked if procured by concealment/misrepresentation or affiliation with communist/terrorist groups within the statutory window. 🚨 Mamdani checks both boxes: • Publicly glorified the Holy Land Five - convicted on 108 counts of funneling millions to Hamas (designated terrorist org). Adjudicated fact. • Card-carrying Democratic Socialist of America (DSA) - largest U.S. Marxist group, aligned with foreign communists in Cuba, Europe, Asia, Latin America. • Expressed allegiance to India’s Communist Party inside the 5-year window. • Praised Hamas’s U.S. finance arm pre-oath. This is black-letter law. 🔺Supporting Hamas networks is material support for terrorism. 🔺Conceal that support during naturalization? Fraud. Join or affiliate after? Disqualification. 🔺Once citizenship is revoked, deportation is mandatory under INA § 212(a)(3)(B). And still - nothing! Rep. Andy Ogles formally referred Mamdani for denaturalization in June. Met AG Pam Bondi in July on “the New York situation.” Sent follow-up in October with new evidence. 🔺Result: Zero hearings, Zero action, Zero enforcement. The question isn’t whether the law exists - it’s whether this government will enforce it against Leftist ideological royalty. Will America allow a Hamas-aligned Marxist foreign national to hold office and weaponize our institutions against us - with impunity? The answer sits on Attorney General Pam Bondi’s desk. Until the law is enforced, RAIR will keep naming the threat: Denaturalize. Deport. Hold accountable. Stop TALKING, REPUBLICANS - DO SOMETHING!

Amy Mek

1,220,264 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

My brief theory on how we got to this point. Indoctrination and the destruction of the nuclear family is how we got here. We are being destroyed from within by the very government sworn to protect us. Since the Civil War the Democrats have been planning and plotting to change this country by destroying it from within. Look at what they did to Lincoln for an example, they never accept their defeat. In the 1960s, when JFK was assassinated by the government, one could assume that we went from a two-party system to a Uniparty system. There is no way that JFK's assassination would have been covered up if the Federal government wasn't already corrupted on both sides by communists that JFK and others had warned Americans about. 1. The government destroyed the nuclear family, forcing both parents to work in most households, using various methods including feminism. 2. The government then stepped in, taking the place of parents as the authority on what is right and wrong, true or false, and that continues even after school. The government has taken control of what propaganda the media puts out in order to continue the brainwashing of children and others with commercials, TV shows, movies, and their woke agenda, which is anti-family, anti-God, anti-morality, pro-climate change, pro-open borders, pro-illegal immigration, pro-COVID-19 vaccines, endless pronouns, and anything the government says they should support. 3. This indoctrination has been happening for decades, so some of them are now young adults who accept these ideas of open borders, welcoming illegal immigrants at any cost, and climate change. Where did these traitors in our government learn this from? They learned it from the Nazi's during World War II. They saw how effective taking control of the youth was and how quickly they could change a nation by doing so. 4. These young adults do have the time to protest and they do when it goes against what the government has taught them, but not when it comes to their best interests, like having a secure border, deporting illegals, and putting law-abiding citizens' safety before criminals, because the majority of them have been brainwashed like I stated above. Meanwhile, the parents who have not been brainwashed are aging, working full-time, barely making it, and they're watching as no one is protesting, asking themselves "how did we get to this point?" They're getting angry and wondering why so few are demanding change. We are at a point where people are now being affected more and more on a personal level, with the costs of everything going up, higher crime, and other issues. Then we see the illegals getting VIP treatment while homeless vets and the rest of us are treated like second-class citizens, having to live by a set of rules that the illegals don't. So then one might ask, why would people allow this? I answered it above. When you destroy the nuclear family and indoctrinate children/people with anti-family, anti-God, anti-morality, you lower the morality in this country. Once morals tank below a certain level, you see these kinds of behaviors that allow this to happen from people on a mass scale. This is human nature and has happened throughout history. Bonhoeffer‘s Theory of Stupidity explains this concept.
5:58

My brief theory on how we got to this point. Indoctrination and the destruction of the nuclear family is how we got here. We are being destroyed from within by the very government sworn to protect us. Since the Civil War the Democrats have been planning and plotting to change this country by destroying it from within. Look at what they did to Lincoln for an example, they never accept their defeat. In the 1960s, when JFK was assassinated by the government, one could assume that we went from a two-party system to a Uniparty system. There is no way that JFK's assassination would have been covered up if the Federal government wasn't already corrupted on both sides by communists that JFK and others had warned Americans about. 1. The government destroyed the nuclear family, forcing both parents to work in most households, using various methods including feminism. 2. The government then stepped in, taking the place of parents as the authority on what is right and wrong, true or false, and that continues even after school. The government has taken control of what propaganda the media puts out in order to continue the brainwashing of children and others with commercials, TV shows, movies, and their woke agenda, which is anti-family, anti-God, anti-morality, pro-climate change, pro-open borders, pro-illegal immigration, pro-COVID-19 vaccines, endless pronouns, and anything the government says they should support. 3. This indoctrination has been happening for decades, so some of them are now young adults who accept these ideas of open borders, welcoming illegal immigrants at any cost, and climate change. Where did these traitors in our government learn this from? They learned it from the Nazi's during World War II. They saw how effective taking control of the youth was and how quickly they could change a nation by doing so. 4. These young adults do have the time to protest and they do when it goes against what the government has taught them, but not when it comes to their best interests, like having a secure border, deporting illegals, and putting law-abiding citizens' safety before criminals, because the majority of them have been brainwashed like I stated above. Meanwhile, the parents who have not been brainwashed are aging, working full-time, barely making it, and they're watching as no one is protesting, asking themselves "how did we get to this point?" They're getting angry and wondering why so few are demanding change. We are at a point where people are now being affected more and more on a personal level, with the costs of everything going up, higher crime, and other issues. Then we see the illegals getting VIP treatment while homeless vets and the rest of us are treated like second-class citizens, having to live by a set of rules that the illegals don't. So then one might ask, why would people allow this? I answered it above. When you destroy the nuclear family and indoctrinate children/people with anti-family, anti-God, anti-morality, you lower the morality in this country. Once morals tank below a certain level, you see these kinds of behaviors that allow this to happen from people on a mass scale. This is human nature and has happened throughout history. Bonhoeffer‘s Theory of Stupidity explains this concept.

Suhr Majesty

1,000,961 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The South African Immigration Crisis And How It Can Fixed With A Long Term Solution The political and economic chaos in neighbouring countries around South Africa benefits businesses and opportunistic politicians in South Africa. That is why business doesn’t condemn the abuse of human rights, rigging of elections and corrupt rule in countries like Zimbabwe, it is not in their best interest to do so because they benefit from the outcomes of failed rule in Zimbabwe. How does this work? Zimbabwe’s unemployment rate is 95%, it has the highest inflation in the world (1266% per year), hospitals have collapsed, and it is hell on earth without any social welfare system due to the continued looting of public funds by the Zimbabwean tyrant and his goons. This pushes desperate and unemployed Zimbabweans to cross the border into South Africa to find a job, healthcare, and a better life. When they cross over into South Africa, either legally or illegally, and overstay, they become vulnerable to local businesses which offer them employment paying very low wages, they take the jobs because they are desperate to survive. Businesses or farm owners in Limpopo or on wine farms in Cape Town badly underpay them, knowing they have no recourse to the law because they are illegal, something that they cannot do to a South African citizen who is protected by the law. As this happens, wages drop because cheap labour is now available, and it is not unionised so they cannot fight for any rights to fair wages. These Zimbabweans, and Africans in general, will take anything to survive and see another day, they have families to feed back in their countries of origin. This disempowers the South African worker, who cannot negotiate for higher wages because that power has been eroded and taken away by the availability of cheap labour. Businesses, in turn, tell the locals to go hang if they try to negotiate for a living wage because they have cheap labour readily available, the illegal immigrant needs the job. The locals (South Africans) get angry and fight these illegal immigrants in their communities, leading to the emergence of vigilante groups and peripheral opportunistic political actors who exploit this to gain votes from locals who feel stifled and desperate in their own country. Cosmetic, choreographed police and immigration raids are carried out to appease the restive poor and unemployed South Africans. These illegal immigrants are deported on a Monday, and by Friday, they are back. This is known as the revolving door. The border officials are so corrupt that they facilitate this revolving door because they profit from it, so you cannot currently use immigration control to deal with this on land borders where people come by road. Some illegal immigrants do not even leave South Africa because the police who arrest them will also accept bribes. In this heated emotional debate in South Africa, no real solutions are proposed because opportunistic politicians simply shout “ABAHAMBE,” get some votes and repeat the same to remain relevant in public discourse. It is funny how it is so easy to appease voters with such empty slogans that do not bring any tangible solutions, but the desperate voter is fickle, they fall for anything. What these politicians do not say, or choose to ignore, is that when these illegals go, they will return the next day. It is an inconvenient conversation for politicians because it undermines their ability to mobilise votes. The root cause of this immigration crisis lies in Zimbabwean and African politics driven by corrupt rule, the abuse of human rights, and rigged elections. President Cyril Ramaphosa and his ruling ANC political party publicly support the authors of this crisis in Zimbabwe, so the root cause cannot be addressed at the source now until South Africans have an honest family conversation to deal with this once and for all. Unemployed Zimbabweans feel that the ANC and its government have a moral obligation to let them come because they are supporting corrupt rule in Zimbabwe, and they are doing so publicly. This is compounded by the cowardice of Zimbabweans and the dearth of any meaningful opposition leadership in that country. Yet we have a serios crisis. So, what do we do about it to resolve the illegal immigration nightmare in South Africa, which is driving wages down and enriching businesses and the political class? Someone must put meaningful proposals on the table because this has been with us for decades, and it remains unresolved. These proposals should not be rooted in emotional discourse, but practical realities that confront South Africa. This crisis can’t be resolved through political rhetoric or “Abahambe” or any empty Pan-African slogans which ignore the ongoing realities. Real leaders provide practical solutions and don’t do it for social media retweets or likes, but for solid and long term resolutions that that will fix the crisis. We know that wages are being pushed down for South Africans due to the availability of cheap labour from illegal immigrants, and that these illegal immigrants cannot demand better wages because they cannot approach the authorities or unionise, given their illegal immigration status. The only way out, to help local South African workers who refuse to work for a pittance in restaurants, and rightly so, is to legalise those already in South Africa, so that the authorities know who they are. You implement regulations ensuring that these workers can be employed and pay taxes, but also make sure that jobs must be offered to South Africans first, they do that in Zimbabwe with the little jobs available, and that is a standard practice the world over. Where no South African is willing to take up the job, it can be offered to a documented migrant, who will be paying taxes. It will now be easier to negotiate for better wages because all workers local and migrant will now be unionised, something that big business and the political class privately do not want because it takes away the power to undermine wage negotiations and to campaign for votes respectively. Wages will rise for South African workers because everyone will then be able to negotiate for a better wage without fear of being deported. Any company caught employing illegal immigrants will be shut down immediately using laws created to deal with this problem of greedy business owners taking advantage of illegal immigration, with all the money in its bank accounts seized by the State. This will stop the employment of anyone illegal and undocumented and will provide cover for those given an amnesty for documentation. I want to make this clear, South Africans will never be able to negotiate for a living wage if there are illegal immigrants, politicians will lie to the citizens but this is the unpalatable truth. Once this is resolved, opportunistic politicians will then focus on service delivery rather than gaslighting poor South Africans with “Abahambe,” knowing that when the illegals go, they will return tomorrow morning. When illegal immigrants are documented and have bank accounts, they will begin to pay taxes and can also become entrepreneurial, creating businesses that will employ more South Africans and contribute to economic growth of South Africa. Documenting illegals and gathering their biometric data will also reduce crime because undocumented immigrants can commit crimes and evade detection, as the South African state currently does not know who they are or where they live. When they work legally or open small businesses, they will contribute to the South African fiscus, which will fund the public hospitals they use and the schools their children attend. The revolving door applies to Africans who need visas too, they are deported to Nigeria, they acquire a new identity, fly to Zimbabwe and come to South Africa by road where they pay border officials a bribe and get it in. Zimbabwe is no longer a foreign policy issue only for the South African government, it is a domestic issue as well because of illegal immigration that has brought many Zimbabweans into South Africa. It is not their fault, they are also victims of a corrupt government and each time they try to vote out the regime in Harare, the ANC publicly support rigged elections and give diplomatic cover to the Zimbabwean tyrant Emmerson Mnangagwa. Refusing to document illegals hoping that deportations will solve the problem demonstrates incompetence and ignorance to how illegal immigration works. It will continue to perpetuate low wages for South Africans and those that shout “Abahambe” know this very well. Documentation will make it easy because these migrants will see it in their best interest to unionise and fight for a better wage. You set laws that everyone covered by this amnesty cannot apply for South African citizenship as they do in the United Arab Emirates because this should only be done to clear a long running problem to help deal with border control properly without losing focus because of those already in South Africa. Ministers cannot continue to pretend to be activists when they now sit on the cabinet table, if nothing changes during the five years they are in power, they would have failed, they cannot shout “Abahambe” again in 2029. Business cannot continue to benefit from the misery of poor Zimbabweans because of the refusal to document them, it is the South African citizen that will suffer more, deportation has failed to solve this problem. It is time for strong and reflective leadership that makes tough but sustainable decisions that have a long-term ability to resolve this issue. South Africans will have another opportunity to send a strong message in 2026, they should use it and not make the politicians continue to use this dysfunctionality continue at the expense of the South African citizen and the desperate undocumented immigrants. It is easy to control the border when you have cleaned up the existing problem in the country first, it requires men and women in leadership with a spine. If you want to discuss any issues arising from this article you can e-mail me at hopewell2@post.harvard.edu
4:40

The South African Immigration Crisis And How It Can Fixed With A Long Term Solution The political and economic chaos in neighbouring countries around South Africa benefits businesses and opportunistic politicians in South Africa. That is why business doesn’t condemn the abuse of human rights, rigging of elections and corrupt rule in countries like Zimbabwe, it is not in their best interest to do so because they benefit from the outcomes of failed rule in Zimbabwe. How does this work? Zimbabwe’s unemployment rate is 95%, it has the highest inflation in the world (1266% per year), hospitals have collapsed, and it is hell on earth without any social welfare system due to the continued looting of public funds by the Zimbabwean tyrant and his goons. This pushes desperate and unemployed Zimbabweans to cross the border into South Africa to find a job, healthcare, and a better life. When they cross over into South Africa, either legally or illegally, and overstay, they become vulnerable to local businesses which offer them employment paying very low wages, they take the jobs because they are desperate to survive. Businesses or farm owners in Limpopo or on wine farms in Cape Town badly underpay them, knowing they have no recourse to the law because they are illegal, something that they cannot do to a South African citizen who is protected by the law. As this happens, wages drop because cheap labour is now available, and it is not unionised so they cannot fight for any rights to fair wages. These Zimbabweans, and Africans in general, will take anything to survive and see another day, they have families to feed back in their countries of origin. This disempowers the South African worker, who cannot negotiate for higher wages because that power has been eroded and taken away by the availability of cheap labour. Businesses, in turn, tell the locals to go hang if they try to negotiate for a living wage because they have cheap labour readily available, the illegal immigrant needs the job. The locals (South Africans) get angry and fight these illegal immigrants in their communities, leading to the emergence of vigilante groups and peripheral opportunistic political actors who exploit this to gain votes from locals who feel stifled and desperate in their own country. Cosmetic, choreographed police and immigration raids are carried out to appease the restive poor and unemployed South Africans. These illegal immigrants are deported on a Monday, and by Friday, they are back. This is known as the revolving door. The border officials are so corrupt that they facilitate this revolving door because they profit from it, so you cannot currently use immigration control to deal with this on land borders where people come by road. Some illegal immigrants do not even leave South Africa because the police who arrest them will also accept bribes. In this heated emotional debate in South Africa, no real solutions are proposed because opportunistic politicians simply shout “ABAHAMBE,” get some votes and repeat the same to remain relevant in public discourse. It is funny how it is so easy to appease voters with such empty slogans that do not bring any tangible solutions, but the desperate voter is fickle, they fall for anything. What these politicians do not say, or choose to ignore, is that when these illegals go, they will return the next day. It is an inconvenient conversation for politicians because it undermines their ability to mobilise votes. The root cause of this immigration crisis lies in Zimbabwean and African politics driven by corrupt rule, the abuse of human rights, and rigged elections. President Cyril Ramaphosa and his ruling ANC political party publicly support the authors of this crisis in Zimbabwe, so the root cause cannot be addressed at the source now until South Africans have an honest family conversation to deal with this once and for all. Unemployed Zimbabweans feel that the ANC and its government have a moral obligation to let them come because they are supporting corrupt rule in Zimbabwe, and they are doing so publicly. This is compounded by the cowardice of Zimbabweans and the dearth of any meaningful opposition leadership in that country. Yet we have a serios crisis. So, what do we do about it to resolve the illegal immigration nightmare in South Africa, which is driving wages down and enriching businesses and the political class? Someone must put meaningful proposals on the table because this has been with us for decades, and it remains unresolved. These proposals should not be rooted in emotional discourse, but practical realities that confront South Africa. This crisis can’t be resolved through political rhetoric or “Abahambe” or any empty Pan-African slogans which ignore the ongoing realities. Real leaders provide practical solutions and don’t do it for social media retweets or likes, but for solid and long term resolutions that that will fix the crisis. We know that wages are being pushed down for South Africans due to the availability of cheap labour from illegal immigrants, and that these illegal immigrants cannot demand better wages because they cannot approach the authorities or unionise, given their illegal immigration status. The only way out, to help local South African workers who refuse to work for a pittance in restaurants, and rightly so, is to legalise those already in South Africa, so that the authorities know who they are. You implement regulations ensuring that these workers can be employed and pay taxes, but also make sure that jobs must be offered to South Africans first, they do that in Zimbabwe with the little jobs available, and that is a standard practice the world over. Where no South African is willing to take up the job, it can be offered to a documented migrant, who will be paying taxes. It will now be easier to negotiate for better wages because all workers local and migrant will now be unionised, something that big business and the political class privately do not want because it takes away the power to undermine wage negotiations and to campaign for votes respectively. Wages will rise for South African workers because everyone will then be able to negotiate for a better wage without fear of being deported. Any company caught employing illegal immigrants will be shut down immediately using laws created to deal with this problem of greedy business owners taking advantage of illegal immigration, with all the money in its bank accounts seized by the State. This will stop the employment of anyone illegal and undocumented and will provide cover for those given an amnesty for documentation. I want to make this clear, South Africans will never be able to negotiate for a living wage if there are illegal immigrants, politicians will lie to the citizens but this is the unpalatable truth. Once this is resolved, opportunistic politicians will then focus on service delivery rather than gaslighting poor South Africans with “Abahambe,” knowing that when the illegals go, they will return tomorrow morning. When illegal immigrants are documented and have bank accounts, they will begin to pay taxes and can also become entrepreneurial, creating businesses that will employ more South Africans and contribute to economic growth of South Africa. Documenting illegals and gathering their biometric data will also reduce crime because undocumented immigrants can commit crimes and evade detection, as the South African state currently does not know who they are or where they live. When they work legally or open small businesses, they will contribute to the South African fiscus, which will fund the public hospitals they use and the schools their children attend. The revolving door applies to Africans who need visas too, they are deported to Nigeria, they acquire a new identity, fly to Zimbabwe and come to South Africa by road where they pay border officials a bribe and get it in. Zimbabwe is no longer a foreign policy issue only for the South African government, it is a domestic issue as well because of illegal immigration that has brought many Zimbabweans into South Africa. It is not their fault, they are also victims of a corrupt government and each time they try to vote out the regime in Harare, the ANC publicly support rigged elections and give diplomatic cover to the Zimbabwean tyrant Emmerson Mnangagwa. Refusing to document illegals hoping that deportations will solve the problem demonstrates incompetence and ignorance to how illegal immigration works. It will continue to perpetuate low wages for South Africans and those that shout “Abahambe” know this very well. Documentation will make it easy because these migrants will see it in their best interest to unionise and fight for a better wage. You set laws that everyone covered by this amnesty cannot apply for South African citizenship as they do in the United Arab Emirates because this should only be done to clear a long running problem to help deal with border control properly without losing focus because of those already in South Africa. Ministers cannot continue to pretend to be activists when they now sit on the cabinet table, if nothing changes during the five years they are in power, they would have failed, they cannot shout “Abahambe” again in 2029. Business cannot continue to benefit from the misery of poor Zimbabweans because of the refusal to document them, it is the South African citizen that will suffer more, deportation has failed to solve this problem. It is time for strong and reflective leadership that makes tough but sustainable decisions that have a long-term ability to resolve this issue. South Africans will have another opportunity to send a strong message in 2026, they should use it and not make the politicians continue to use this dysfunctionality continue at the expense of the South African citizen and the desperate undocumented immigrants. It is easy to control the border when you have cleaned up the existing problem in the country first, it requires men and women in leadership with a spine. If you want to discuss any issues arising from this article you can e-mail me at [email protected]

Hopewell Chin’ono

81,811 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In this video, Tal Oran claps back to Macklemore’s song referring to Israelis as “white colonizers.” When are we going to retire this? Never mind that statistically, the majority of Israelis are Mizrakhim (Middle Eastern Jews who were forced back to their ancestral homeland as refugees after being ethnically cleansed from every corner of the globe and to escape the subjugation of Islamism that has continued through Oct. 7), but “colonization” by definition is when a “home” or “host” country sends a colony to invade a foreign land. Everyone has accepted by now that Jews lived on the land before the various conquests and colonizations that brought in transient populations, satisfying the definition of indigenous. It’s therefore not possible to colonize land that you are indigenous to. Perhaps there is a different term for this division of land between two people, but colonization isn’t it. Second, and importantly, there was no colonizing home/host country that sent a “colony” to invade. People on the ground who legally owned the land in pre-existing Jewish neighborhoods are the ones who established it as a state in 1948. A country of refugees built with sweat and muscle. This is exactly the same thing that was happening all across the ME/WA region at the same time at the collapse of the Caliphate. Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Bahrain, Iraq etc were all established through western mandates at the time. Each of them divided land and created borders based on their national/cultural/ethnic identities that had once co-inhabited the same (colonized) lands, and indeed, fought for wider borders before trading maximalism for sovereignty and accepting compromise. Are they all white colonizers, too? I know, I know, everyone is angry that the land also absorbed the Ashkenazi Jews who managed to escape the Holocaust that gassed 6 million of them in the single largest genocide in all of history, because if it were you, you would’ve all jumped off of the boat and took your own life to spare being called a “white colonizer” by the children of white colonizers in the future, right? If you’re angry at violent governments that identify as religious states, there’s tons of Christian and Muslim states to rail against, including one that literally refers to itself as the “Islamic” Republic (in fact, several do). And yet, I see no protests despite the daily slaughters and decades of Islamist imperialism that “anti-imperialists” conveniently ignore. I know it’s hard to believe, but you can legitimately be pro-Israel and pro-Palestine at the same time. You can hold two truths at once. You can believe in co-existence. You can protest the current Israeli government, politicians, extremist officials, occupied territories, settlers, war policies etc and still not call for the end of the only Jewish state in the world. It’s hard to believe that such a movement is not inherently antisemitic, as Macklemore’s lyrics would imply.
2:54

In this video, Tal Oran claps back to Macklemore’s song referring to Israelis as “white colonizers.” When are we going to retire this? Never mind that statistically, the majority of Israelis are Mizrakhim (Middle Eastern Jews who were forced back to their ancestral homeland as refugees after being ethnically cleansed from every corner of the globe and to escape the subjugation of Islamism that has continued through Oct. 7), but “colonization” by definition is when a “home” or “host” country sends a colony to invade a foreign land. Everyone has accepted by now that Jews lived on the land before the various conquests and colonizations that brought in transient populations, satisfying the definition of indigenous. It’s therefore not possible to colonize land that you are indigenous to. Perhaps there is a different term for this division of land between two people, but colonization isn’t it. Second, and importantly, there was no colonizing home/host country that sent a “colony” to invade. People on the ground who legally owned the land in pre-existing Jewish neighborhoods are the ones who established it as a state in 1948. A country of refugees built with sweat and muscle. This is exactly the same thing that was happening all across the ME/WA region at the same time at the collapse of the Caliphate. Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Bahrain, Iraq etc were all established through western mandates at the time. Each of them divided land and created borders based on their national/cultural/ethnic identities that had once co-inhabited the same (colonized) lands, and indeed, fought for wider borders before trading maximalism for sovereignty and accepting compromise. Are they all white colonizers, too? I know, I know, everyone is angry that the land also absorbed the Ashkenazi Jews who managed to escape the Holocaust that gassed 6 million of them in the single largest genocide in all of history, because if it were you, you would’ve all jumped off of the boat and took your own life to spare being called a “white colonizer” by the children of white colonizers in the future, right? If you’re angry at violent governments that identify as religious states, there’s tons of Christian and Muslim states to rail against, including one that literally refers to itself as the “Islamic” Republic (in fact, several do). And yet, I see no protests despite the daily slaughters and decades of Islamist imperialism that “anti-imperialists” conveniently ignore. I know it’s hard to believe, but you can legitimately be pro-Israel and pro-Palestine at the same time. You can hold two truths at once. You can believe in co-existence. You can protest the current Israeli government, politicians, extremist officials, occupied territories, settlers, war policies etc and still not call for the end of the only Jewish state in the world. It’s hard to believe that such a movement is not inherently antisemitic, as Macklemore’s lyrics would imply.

Elica Le Bon الیکا‌ ل بن

281,531 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

It’s not 10 million, the actual number is over 30 million criminal illegal invaders that have invaded the U.S, under the Harris Biden Regime. The media and your government are lying! Again, it’s OVER 30 million criminal illegal invaders since 2021 and 1-2 million more are coming via both south (10-20%), north borders, flights and by sea before January 2025! This is 💯 Barack Obama using what he learned at Columbia University known as the Cloward–Piven strategy to overwhelm police, fire, schools, hospitals, social services, etc., etc., with the end goal of total societal collapse. No city or county will be safe. This first video is Republican Newport Beach, Orange County, CA, Lido Isle to be exact. If it can happen here, it can happen anywhere. The cartels are using NGOs to undermine city after city, county after county. They own the media, police, city managers, city councils, mayors, county supervisors, district attorneys, prosecutors, judges. They easily buy whoever they want with the hundreds of billions they are earning. Their offer is simple, lead or gold. As the Biden administration began tapping down the southern border, the northern border opened up, but they’ve also unleashed a program to boost illegal immigration that allows immigrants to fly directly from their hometowns, even from dangerous ‘special interest countries’ i.e. those with terrorist ties, directly into 43 different U.S. city of their choice. Instead of rushing the Texas border, the program lets immigrants use the administration’s app to pick a destination, buy an airline ticket, and fly in unseen on what amounts to ghost flights. Many times, even the planes transponders are turned off. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, which sued the Department of Homeland Security for the documents on the program, over 210,000 have been processed since January. That is a population the size of Rochester, New York, or Des Moines, Iowa. “DHS cajoles tens of thousands of intending illegal border-crossers per month to instead go on the CBP One smartphone application, and make an appointment with U.S. officials at land ports of entry instead of crossing illegally. After making an appointment, DHS invites these inadmissible aliens to walk over to the American side at the land ports, where U.S. Customs officials quickly ‘parole’ them in, allowing them to travel to a city of their choice in the nation’s interior,” the report from immigration analyst Todd Bensman said. The DHS is even instructing illegals to use the CBP One App, but come January 20, 2025, under a Trump Presidency, we will use that same CBP One App, along with GPS to track down and deport every one of them.
0:51

It’s not 10 million, the actual number is over 30 million criminal illegal invaders that have invaded the U.S, under the Harris Biden Regime. The media and your government are lying! Again, it’s OVER 30 million criminal illegal invaders since 2021 and 1-2 million more are coming via both south (10-20%), north borders, flights and by sea before January 2025! This is 💯 Barack Obama using what he learned at Columbia University known as the Cloward–Piven strategy to overwhelm police, fire, schools, hospitals, social services, etc., etc., with the end goal of total societal collapse. No city or county will be safe. This first video is Republican Newport Beach, Orange County, CA, Lido Isle to be exact. If it can happen here, it can happen anywhere. The cartels are using NGOs to undermine city after city, county after county. They own the media, police, city managers, city councils, mayors, county supervisors, district attorneys, prosecutors, judges. They easily buy whoever they want with the hundreds of billions they are earning. Their offer is simple, lead or gold. As the Biden administration began tapping down the southern border, the northern border opened up, but they’ve also unleashed a program to boost illegal immigration that allows immigrants to fly directly from their hometowns, even from dangerous ‘special interest countries’ i.e. those with terrorist ties, directly into 43 different U.S. city of their choice. Instead of rushing the Texas border, the program lets immigrants use the administration’s app to pick a destination, buy an airline ticket, and fly in unseen on what amounts to ghost flights. Many times, even the planes transponders are turned off. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, which sued the Department of Homeland Security for the documents on the program, over 210,000 have been processed since January. That is a population the size of Rochester, New York, or Des Moines, Iowa. “DHS cajoles tens of thousands of intending illegal border-crossers per month to instead go on the CBP One smartphone application, and make an appointment with U.S. officials at land ports of entry instead of crossing illegally. After making an appointment, DHS invites these inadmissible aliens to walk over to the American side at the land ports, where U.S. Customs officials quickly ‘parole’ them in, allowing them to travel to a city of their choice in the nation’s interior,” the report from immigration analyst Todd Bensman said. The DHS is even instructing illegals to use the CBP One App, but come January 20, 2025, under a Trump Presidency, we will use that same CBP One App, along with GPS to track down and deport every one of them.

Tony Seruga

166,775 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨SHARIA WARNING TO SEN. TOMMY TUBERVILLE & ALL ALABAMIANS.... Sharia Over Alabama Law: Birmingham's Largest Mosque Has Bound Itself to Islamic Law and the Muslim Brotherhood Network The Birmingham Islamic Society (BIS) - one of Alabama's biggest and most influential mosques - doesn't operate like a normal American house of worship. Its own official Constitution declares: "ANY ACTIVITY CONTRARY TO OR IN CONFLICT WITH THE QUR'AN AND THE SUNNAH SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED… THE PRINCIPLE OF SHURA SHALL BE THE GOVERNING PRINCIPLE." Every decision, membership rule, and activity must conform to SHARIA. 🔺 Men only for certain leadership roles. 🔺 Hijab required for sisters in an official capacity. 🔺 Aggressive dawah (proselytization) is a core mission. 🔺 Assets & Disputes Locked Into the Muslim Brotherhood System ❗️❗️❗️Upon dissolution, all assets go to NAIT (North American Islamic Trust) - the same Muslim Brotherhood-linked entity repeatedly tied in federal court records (including the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial) to controlling mosque properties across America as a permanent waqf (Islamic endowment). 🔺 Internal disputes that can't be settled locally are routed to external Islamic arbitration, explicitly naming NAIT as an example. This creates a closed Sharia legal loop that bypasses Alabama courts. 🔺 Sharia Wills Override Alabama Law BIS promotes a standard Islamic Last Will and Testament tailored for Alabama Muslims. It explicitly states that Islamic rules supersede the writer's own wishes in any conflict, and is designed to impose Quranic inheritance and Sharia burial rules through a legally enforceable Alabama will. Inheritance follows Quran 4:11 (males get double the share of females). 🔺 Guardians for minor children must be Muslim and raise them as "practicing Sunni Muslims." 🔺 Burial rules are pure Sharia (no autopsy, no embalming, body in soil facing Kaaba, as soon as possible). 🔺 Disputes go to binding Islamic arbitration. 🔺 Unpaid zakat and other religious obligations must be settled first. This is not just "personal faith." This is a parallel legal system being normalized inside Alabama. 🚨Leadership History Raises Serious Red Flags - In Their Own Words This isn't guilt by association. It's what BIS's own leaders have said and done: 🔺 President emeritus Ashfaq Taufique openly called himself a "fundamentalist" and told his congregation that "Political Activism for Muslims is no longer an option; it is an obligation," urging Muslims to "shape our government." 🔺 A founder of the mosque's outreach program publicly spread antisemitic conspiracy theories - claiming as recently as 2026 that Jews, not Muslims, carried out 9/11. 🔺 BIS hired imams with documented Muslim Brotherhood ties, including one named in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial. 🚨 THE TEXAS CONNECTION - One Network, One Goal - BIS also brought in Imam Main Al-Qudah to teach its congregation "financial stability" - meaning Sharia-compliant finance, exactly as its constitution directs. But Al-Qudah is no ordinary lecturer. 👀In sworn testimony before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Al-Qudah admitted his father and uncle were members of the Muslim Brotherhood. The court summarized his own asylum claim in black and white: he "advocated the imposition of Islamic law [Sharia] instead of secular law." He was ordered deported in 2013. Today, that same man is building an $80 MILLION, 30-acre Islamic compound - the Al-Huda Islamic Center - in Katy, Texas: a self-contained "parallel society" insulated from American law. This is the point Alabamians must understand: Birmingham is not an isolated case. The SAME Muslim Brotherhood-linked network - the same NAIT endowment model, the same Al-Azhar-trained imams, the same MAS-tied operatives - is running the SAME playbook in Texas, Alabama, and states across the country. From a Birmingham mosque constitution to an $80 million compound in Texas, it is one coordinated effort to Islamize America, community by community. Recent Pushback in Hoover When BIS's affiliated Islamic Academy of Alabama tried to expand in Hoover, the community and Sen. Tommy Tuberville pushed back hard. The Planning Commission recommended denial. Good. But this is not the end. These organizations are patient. The infrastructure - constitutional Sharia supremacy, NAIT asset lock, Sharia wills, and Brotherhood-linked leadership - remains firmly in place. Senator Tuberville, you've already spoken clearly against Sharia and Islamic expansion in America. Alabama needs you to take the next step: Investigate the Birmingham Islamic Society's governing documents, its ties to NAIT, and the full scope of this parallel system - and how it connects to the same Brotherhood network operating in Texas and beyond. This is about whether American law or Sharia will ultimately govern parts of Alabama. SEE THE FULL REPORT HERE:
4:14

🚨SHARIA WARNING TO SEN. TOMMY TUBERVILLE & ALL ALABAMIANS.... Sharia Over Alabama Law: Birmingham's Largest Mosque Has Bound Itself to Islamic Law and the Muslim Brotherhood Network The Birmingham Islamic Society (BIS) - one of Alabama's biggest and most influential mosques - doesn't operate like a normal American house of worship. Its own official Constitution declares: "ANY ACTIVITY CONTRARY TO OR IN CONFLICT WITH THE QUR'AN AND THE SUNNAH SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED… THE PRINCIPLE OF SHURA SHALL BE THE GOVERNING PRINCIPLE." Every decision, membership rule, and activity must conform to SHARIA. 🔺 Men only for certain leadership roles. 🔺 Hijab required for sisters in an official capacity. 🔺 Aggressive dawah (proselytization) is a core mission. 🔺 Assets & Disputes Locked Into the Muslim Brotherhood System ❗️❗️❗️Upon dissolution, all assets go to NAIT (North American Islamic Trust) - the same Muslim Brotherhood-linked entity repeatedly tied in federal court records (including the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial) to controlling mosque properties across America as a permanent waqf (Islamic endowment). 🔺 Internal disputes that can't be settled locally are routed to external Islamic arbitration, explicitly naming NAIT as an example. This creates a closed Sharia legal loop that bypasses Alabama courts. 🔺 Sharia Wills Override Alabama Law BIS promotes a standard Islamic Last Will and Testament tailored for Alabama Muslims. It explicitly states that Islamic rules supersede the writer's own wishes in any conflict, and is designed to impose Quranic inheritance and Sharia burial rules through a legally enforceable Alabama will. Inheritance follows Quran 4:11 (males get double the share of females). 🔺 Guardians for minor children must be Muslim and raise them as "practicing Sunni Muslims." 🔺 Burial rules are pure Sharia (no autopsy, no embalming, body in soil facing Kaaba, as soon as possible). 🔺 Disputes go to binding Islamic arbitration. 🔺 Unpaid zakat and other religious obligations must be settled first. This is not just "personal faith." This is a parallel legal system being normalized inside Alabama. 🚨Leadership History Raises Serious Red Flags - In Their Own Words This isn't guilt by association. It's what BIS's own leaders have said and done: 🔺 President emeritus Ashfaq Taufique openly called himself a "fundamentalist" and told his congregation that "Political Activism for Muslims is no longer an option; it is an obligation," urging Muslims to "shape our government." 🔺 A founder of the mosque's outreach program publicly spread antisemitic conspiracy theories - claiming as recently as 2026 that Jews, not Muslims, carried out 9/11. 🔺 BIS hired imams with documented Muslim Brotherhood ties, including one named in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing trial. 🚨 THE TEXAS CONNECTION - One Network, One Goal - BIS also brought in Imam Main Al-Qudah to teach its congregation "financial stability" - meaning Sharia-compliant finance, exactly as its constitution directs. But Al-Qudah is no ordinary lecturer. 👀In sworn testimony before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Al-Qudah admitted his father and uncle were members of the Muslim Brotherhood. The court summarized his own asylum claim in black and white: he "advocated the imposition of Islamic law [Sharia] instead of secular law." He was ordered deported in 2013. Today, that same man is building an $80 MILLION, 30-acre Islamic compound - the Al-Huda Islamic Center - in Katy, Texas: a self-contained "parallel society" insulated from American law. This is the point Alabamians must understand: Birmingham is not an isolated case. The SAME Muslim Brotherhood-linked network - the same NAIT endowment model, the same Al-Azhar-trained imams, the same MAS-tied operatives - is running the SAME playbook in Texas, Alabama, and states across the country. From a Birmingham mosque constitution to an $80 million compound in Texas, it is one coordinated effort to Islamize America, community by community. Recent Pushback in Hoover When BIS's affiliated Islamic Academy of Alabama tried to expand in Hoover, the community and Sen. Tommy Tuberville pushed back hard. The Planning Commission recommended denial. Good. But this is not the end. These organizations are patient. The infrastructure - constitutional Sharia supremacy, NAIT asset lock, Sharia wills, and Brotherhood-linked leadership - remains firmly in place. Senator Tuberville, you've already spoken clearly against Sharia and Islamic expansion in America. Alabama needs you to take the next step: Investigate the Birmingham Islamic Society's governing documents, its ties to NAIT, and the full scope of this parallel system - and how it connects to the same Brotherhood network operating in Texas and beyond. This is about whether American law or Sharia will ultimately govern parts of Alabama. SEE THE FULL REPORT HERE:

Amy Mek

127,721 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I wish this video wasn’t relevant again, but here we are. To those who say politics aren’t personal, my life tells a different story. In 2011, I lost my partner. Sadly, our love had not been legally recognized at the state or federal level, and in the raw aftermath of his death, I faced discrimination that compounded my grief. This experience ignited my journey advocating for marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights, through public speaking, a documentary called “Bridegroom,” and my YouTube video, “It Could Happen To You.” I knew then, as I know now, that my story was not unique. This fight has always been, and will always be, deeply personal. Over the years, we have celebrated significant victories, like the repeal of Prop 8 in California and the nationwide end of DOMA. These hard-won rights came through decades of relentless advocacy and sacrifice by LGBTQ+ individuals and allies. But today, these gains are once again at risk. We must stay vigilant to protect them. The threat to marriage equality is not hypothetical. The President-elect has openly stated his intention to appoint Supreme Court justices who could dismantle marriage rights at a federal level. Meanwhile, Republican leadership across the country continues to oppose LGBTQ+ protections. Civil rights should never be contingent on geography. We must stand united in protecting these essential freedoms—not just for ourselves, but for future generations who deserve the dignity of equal treatment under the law. Together, let’s make sure that love, equality, and dignity remain protected for all. Our love, our families, our futures are worth fighting for. I know many of us feel hopeless and scared right now, but here are some ways you can take action to protect yourselves and the LGBTQ+ community RIGHT NOW. This is in no way comprehensive, merely a starting point for those who want/need it. PROTECTING OUR LGBTQ+ COMMUNITY ACTION GUIDE 1. LEGAL PROTECTIONS A. Essential Documentation -Update your will -Name spouse/partner explicitly -Detail specific wishes for assets -Consider impact on family benefits B. Legal Safeguards -Create living trust -Secure medical power of attorney -Obtain financial power of attorney -Draft advance healthcare directives C. Family Protection -Complete second parent adoption -Update birth certificates -Secure guardianship documents -Create custody arrangements D. Legal Resources -Find LGBTQ+ friendly lawyers via lgbtqbar. org -Get free consultations when available -Keep copies of all documents in secure location -Share copies with trusted family/friends 2. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT A. Financial Support -Human Rights Campaign (national advocacy) -Lambda Legal (legal defense) -GLAAD (media representation) -The Trevor Project (youth support) -Local LGBTQ+ centers and shelters B. Economic Action -Research and support LGBTQ+ owned businesses -Prioritize Black, BIPOC, and women/femme owned enterprises -Share recommendations within community networks -Avoid companies with anti-LGBTQ+ practices C. Active Participation -Attend local drag shows and cultural events -Support inclusive library programs -Join Pride organizing committees -Attend town hall meetings -Participate in local LGBTQ+ groups D. Advocacy & Organization -Join Indivisible. org chapters -Connect with local activists -Register voters -Monitor and respond to local legislation 3. SHARING YOUR STORY A. Personal Empowerment -Reclaim and affirm personal narratives -Amplify LGBTQ+ voices to challenge stereotypes -Educate others about discrimination -Build connections for support and solidarity B. Speaking Out -Share when safe and appropriate -Connect with advocacy groups -Write to local papers -Speak at community meetings -Use social media thoughtfully Need resources? Call: • Trevor Project: 866-488-7386 • LGBT National Hotline: 888-843-4564 • Trans Lifeline: 877-565-8860​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ #EqualLoveEqualRights
10:00

I wish this video wasn’t relevant again, but here we are. To those who say politics aren’t personal, my life tells a different story. In 2011, I lost my partner. Sadly, our love had not been legally recognized at the state or federal level, and in the raw aftermath of his death, I faced discrimination that compounded my grief. This experience ignited my journey advocating for marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights, through public speaking, a documentary called “Bridegroom,” and my YouTube video, “It Could Happen To You.” I knew then, as I know now, that my story was not unique. This fight has always been, and will always be, deeply personal. Over the years, we have celebrated significant victories, like the repeal of Prop 8 in California and the nationwide end of DOMA. These hard-won rights came through decades of relentless advocacy and sacrifice by LGBTQ+ individuals and allies. But today, these gains are once again at risk. We must stay vigilant to protect them. The threat to marriage equality is not hypothetical. The President-elect has openly stated his intention to appoint Supreme Court justices who could dismantle marriage rights at a federal level. Meanwhile, Republican leadership across the country continues to oppose LGBTQ+ protections. Civil rights should never be contingent on geography. We must stand united in protecting these essential freedoms—not just for ourselves, but for future generations who deserve the dignity of equal treatment under the law. Together, let’s make sure that love, equality, and dignity remain protected for all. Our love, our families, our futures are worth fighting for. I know many of us feel hopeless and scared right now, but here are some ways you can take action to protect yourselves and the LGBTQ+ community RIGHT NOW. This is in no way comprehensive, merely a starting point for those who want/need it. PROTECTING OUR LGBTQ+ COMMUNITY ACTION GUIDE 1. LEGAL PROTECTIONS A. Essential Documentation -Update your will -Name spouse/partner explicitly -Detail specific wishes for assets -Consider impact on family benefits B. Legal Safeguards -Create living trust -Secure medical power of attorney -Obtain financial power of attorney -Draft advance healthcare directives C. Family Protection -Complete second parent adoption -Update birth certificates -Secure guardianship documents -Create custody arrangements D. Legal Resources -Find LGBTQ+ friendly lawyers via lgbtqbar. org -Get free consultations when available -Keep copies of all documents in secure location -Share copies with trusted family/friends 2. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT A. Financial Support -Human Rights Campaign (national advocacy) -Lambda Legal (legal defense) -GLAAD (media representation) -The Trevor Project (youth support) -Local LGBTQ+ centers and shelters B. Economic Action -Research and support LGBTQ+ owned businesses -Prioritize Black, BIPOC, and women/femme owned enterprises -Share recommendations within community networks -Avoid companies with anti-LGBTQ+ practices C. Active Participation -Attend local drag shows and cultural events -Support inclusive library programs -Join Pride organizing committees -Attend town hall meetings -Participate in local LGBTQ+ groups D. Advocacy & Organization -Join Indivisible. org chapters -Connect with local activists -Register voters -Monitor and respond to local legislation 3. SHARING YOUR STORY A. Personal Empowerment -Reclaim and affirm personal narratives -Amplify LGBTQ+ voices to challenge stereotypes -Educate others about discrimination -Build connections for support and solidarity B. Speaking Out -Share when safe and appropriate -Connect with advocacy groups -Write to local papers -Speak at community meetings -Use social media thoughtfully Need resources? Call: • Trevor Project: 866-488-7386 • LGBT National Hotline: 888-843-4564 • Trans Lifeline: 877-565-8860​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ #EqualLoveEqualRights

Shane Bitney Crone

18,611 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The rituals of the Admiralty Law CURSE of 1871 are being undone! A return to the Common Law of the Land is taking place. UFC Freedom 250: Is the People’s Consent to the return of the New American Order of 1776. UFC Freedom 250 is a major event taking place on the White House South Lawn. At first glance, a cage fight at the White House may seem like an odd addition to America’s 250th anniversary celebrations. In reality, it is a profound public ceremony that provides the legal mechanism for the full implementation of the New American Order - the restoration of national sovereignty under the law of the land and God’s jurisdiction. To lawfully complete the shift under the law of the land, the sovereigns of that land – the American people – must give their explicit consent. That is the purpose of UFC Freedom 250. Far more than a sporting event, it serves as the public ceremony required under Admiralty Law rules: the people’s visible endorsement of the transition into America’s New Order. The One-Year Process of Restoring American Sovereignty The following shows the steps that have already been taken in the dismantling of Admiralty Law: America recapturing its flag (June 14, 2025): Flag Day celebrates the adoption of the American flag on June 14, 1777. It's the true symbol of land jurisdiction and national sovereignty. It was on this day in 2025 that America initiated the legal process of removing itself from British Admiralty jurisdiction in order to restore its sovereignty and the law of the land. America asked to return to God (April 18, 2026): President Trump reads 2 Chronicles 7:11-12 to the nation as an appeal to return to God in recognition of the original covenant of 1776 - the Declaration of Independence - that places the nation under God’s jurisdiction. Royal visit as a witness (April 27-30, 2026): As the living trustee of the Admiralty-based system, the King and Queen serve as legally recognized eyewitnesses. Their presence functions as formal acknowledgment of America completing the required legal steps for sovereign independence. Fed Chairman steps down (May 15, 2026): The Federal Reserve has played a central role in upholding the British Admiralty (maritime) Law-based commercial system that powers the debt-based economy. By stepping down, it signals the shift back to American jurisdiction. The National Prayer of Dedication (May 17, 2026): This comes one full moon (a complete cycle) after the appeal to the nation to turn back to God. The National Jubilee of Prayer is the public act of rededicating America back to God (2 Chronicles 7:14). It marks the withdrawal of consent from the 1871 commercial system that quietly gave jurisdiction back to the British maritime system, and the restoration of the 1776 covenant. New Fed Chairman sworn in (May 25, 2026): Kevin Warsh was sworn in under the law of the land, which was clearly signaled by the absence of the gold-fringed flag (indicating Admiralty jurisdiction) and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas administering the oath. Using the Old System to End the Old System The transition touches every area of life: spiritual, legal, and economic. At its core is the replacement of the foreign-controlled, Admiralty Law-based legal and financial system that has long dominated the nation. The legal process that began on Flag Day, June 14, 2025, is now nearing completion. By dismantling this structure, America removes the foundation that protected corruption, debt slavery, and treasonous actors loyal to that system. Resistance from those who benefited from that arrangement is inevitable. The transition will involve a turbulent battle against a deeply entrenched system – the “storm” that will precede the people's new order. Though intense, this period will be swift and necessary to remove the remaining barriers to national sovereignty. While the National Prayer of Dedication was an essential step in establishing who the nation would place itself under, it was not the final legal trigger for America’s new order. Under British Admiralty Law, a shift of this magnitude still requires a visible public “ritual” that demonstrates the people's consent through participation and celebration. One of the oldest tools of the Admiralty system is now being used to secure that approval: “Ordo Ab Chao”. UFC Freedom 250 provides exactly that public spectacle: a high-visibility event on the White House lawn that fulfills the ritual requirement and completes the transition to the New American Order. “Ordo Ab Chao” is the hidden motto of high-level Freemasonry. For those placed in positions of power under their “god” Satan (whom they believe to be the true Savior and Illuminator), it is the blueprint for controlled transformation: create chaos first, then offer a “new order” as the solution. Classic Problem-Reaction-Solution. Their system is designed to engineer or exploit disruption through wars, financial crashes, moral collapse, social division, and fear. Once the people are terrified, confused, and desperate, the controllers step forward with the pre-planned “solution”: their new systems of governance, their rules, their gods. However, because humans were created as powerful sovereigns of the physical realm, these systems cannot be lawfully imposed without the acquiescence of the governed. Their operating philosophy is simple: keep the masses ignorant, entertained, and emotionally invested in the spectacle, and they will unknowingly consent to the changes that follow. To obtain that permission, they stage public spectacles of visible, controlled chaos. When people cheer, participate, and become emotionally invested, their maritime law treats that participation as consent. According to their legal doctrine, “ignorance of the law is no excuse”. Once that consent is obtained, they can roll out the changes that follow. UFC Freedom 250 is using this very same tool - but this time, against the enemy. The spectacle on the White House South Lawn is not directed against the American people. Instead, it is aimed at dismantling the British Admiralty system that has long exercised jurisdiction over America. Through public participation, the event secures visible support for the lawful transition to the New American Order under the law of the land. Instead of using their tool to further bind the American people to their system, it is being used to bring that system to an end. The Symbolism of UFC Freedom 250 UFC Freedom 250 is the dramatic event that creates a major spectacle. It is classic staged Ordo Ab Chaos. A highly visible event placed on the White House South Lawn, the center of American power. The two main events: • Main Event (Lightweight Title): Ilia Topuria (undefeated foreign champion) vs. Justin Gaethje (American interim champion). • Co-Main (Heavyweight Interim Title): Alex Pereira (Brazilian) vs. Ciryl Gane (French) — two foreign fighters. While the heavyweight division represents the foreign established powers battling for control, the lightweight division represents the common people. An American fighter in the main event on sovereign land symbolizes the American people entering the final stage of the conflict on their own ground. The octagon cage, where the fights take place, sits on the South Lawn — sovereign American land, not corporate territory. This is the same ground where the King and Queen stood as legal witnesses only weeks earlier. A “fight” inside the cage becomes the perfect public ritual: visible, emotional chaos that the crowd can cheer for. In this symbolic battle, the American crowd’s loud support for Gaethje goes far beyond enthusiasm. By pouring their energy into the American fighter on sovereign American soil, the people, whether aware or not, are symbolically choosing the new land-based American Order over the foreign maritime system. Their cheers act as acquiescence - the people’s approval of the transition and acceptance of the storm that accompanies it. That consent makes the shift out of the old system lawful. The Remaining Events Related to America's Restored Sovereignty Several key events still remain in the process of restoring American sovereignty and completing the transition to the law of the land. UFC Freedom 250 on Flag Day (June 14, 2026): Exactly one year after June 14, 2025 when the legal process of removing Admiralty (maritime) Law and restoring the law of the land began publicly, the American people will deliver their loud consent through Ordo Ab Chao on sovereign land. This allows for the transition that introduces the new system for the people. G7 Meeting (June 15 to 17, 2026): Immediately afterward, President Trump will present the American People’s newly accepted New Order, including the storm that follows, to the G7 leaders. These leaders represent the main powers of that old system. In their legal and ritual rulebook, a major international system cannot be dissolved in private. Trump’s presence delivers formal, in-person notice that America is exiting the old Admiralty system and activating the new land-based system. This forces their acknowledgment and prevents any future legal or ritual challenge. Trump’s “Rally to End All Rallies” (June 24, 2026): This serves as a victory lap that publicly celebrates the people’s consent after formal notice has been given. Military bands will emphasize land-based authority, reinforcing the shift from maritime to law of the land power. The performance of Nessun Dorma (“None Shall Sleep”), the famous dramatic aria from The Sum of All Fears, was played during the mass execution of traitors and Deep State figures. With the people’s permission now granted for the necessary storm, the old system’s protectors “shall sleep no more” as justice proceeds and their protections are removed. The Great American State Fair (June 25, 2026 to July 10, 2026): A massive, joyous celebration stretching from the Capitol to the Washington Monument. Through exhibits, pavilions, performances, and family events, the nation will publicly rejoice in the people’s consent to end the old system, restore the law of the land, and return the nation to God's jurisdiction: the beginning of America’s Golden Age. Independence Day's 250th Anniversary (July 4, 2026): July 4, 1776 marked America’s public declaration of independence from British rule and its placement under God's jurisdiction on the land. That independence was later quietly reversed through the 1871 municipal corporation of DC, placing the nation back under British Admiralty Law. On the 250th anniversary, America completes the lawful process of reversing that quiet reversal. This is not merely a celebration - it marks the symbolic and legal completion of the return to the original 1776 covenant and the full restoration of the law of the land under God’s jurisdiction. The Storm The public ceremony is only the beginning. What follows is the storm. Some may question how it can be right to move forward without the people’s full knowledge of these events. Why not simply tell everyone the truth? Americans already know what they need to know. They understand that the system is broken and corruption is rampant. What they don’t understand is that their permission must still be obtained through the rituals of the very Admiralty Law system most are unaware even exists. Rather than trying to educate the entire nation on that hidden system – which many would dismiss as conspiracy theory or outright impossible - the President is using the enemy's own rules against it for the benefit of the people he has been elected to serve. The storm begins when the existing system starts losing its legal and economic control. Yet the storm is more than their resistance. It is the process by which the new system displaces the old one. Those who built their wealth, influence, and power within the existing structure will suddenly find that the protections they relied upon are no longer there. Corruption will be exposed, long-protected bad actors will face accountability, and the legal, financial, and institutional foundations of the old system will be dismantled and replaced with the New American Order. This is the true meaning of Ordo Ab Chao. The difference is that it’s not being used to enslave the people. It's being used to dismantle the very structure that enslaved them. UFC Freedom 250 is therefore more than a sporting event. It serves as the symbolic moment when the people give their approval to the transition and to the storm that accompanies it. Though intense, the storm will be swift, as the enemy's moves have already been anticipated in order to minimize its effects. This is not only for the benefit of the American people and economy, but for the world as a whole, as the consequences of such a transition will be felt far beyond America's borders. What follows is the dawn of a new era. America will begin healing under the law of the land, restored to its rightful place under God’s jurisdiction. Other nations will soon follow. This is Order Out of Chaos, but for a free people under God.
13:58

The rituals of the Admiralty Law CURSE of 1871 are being undone! A return to the Common Law of the Land is taking place. UFC Freedom 250: Is the People’s Consent to the return of the New American Order of 1776. UFC Freedom 250 is a major event taking place on the White House South Lawn. At first glance, a cage fight at the White House may seem like an odd addition to America’s 250th anniversary celebrations. In reality, it is a profound public ceremony that provides the legal mechanism for the full implementation of the New American Order - the restoration of national sovereignty under the law of the land and God’s jurisdiction. To lawfully complete the shift under the law of the land, the sovereigns of that land – the American people – must give their explicit consent. That is the purpose of UFC Freedom 250. Far more than a sporting event, it serves as the public ceremony required under Admiralty Law rules: the people’s visible endorsement of the transition into America’s New Order. The One-Year Process of Restoring American Sovereignty The following shows the steps that have already been taken in the dismantling of Admiralty Law: America recapturing its flag (June 14, 2025): Flag Day celebrates the adoption of the American flag on June 14, 1777. It's the true symbol of land jurisdiction and national sovereignty. It was on this day in 2025 that America initiated the legal process of removing itself from British Admiralty jurisdiction in order to restore its sovereignty and the law of the land. America asked to return to God (April 18, 2026): President Trump reads 2 Chronicles 7:11-12 to the nation as an appeal to return to God in recognition of the original covenant of 1776 - the Declaration of Independence - that places the nation under God’s jurisdiction. Royal visit as a witness (April 27-30, 2026): As the living trustee of the Admiralty-based system, the King and Queen serve as legally recognized eyewitnesses. Their presence functions as formal acknowledgment of America completing the required legal steps for sovereign independence. Fed Chairman steps down (May 15, 2026): The Federal Reserve has played a central role in upholding the British Admiralty (maritime) Law-based commercial system that powers the debt-based economy. By stepping down, it signals the shift back to American jurisdiction. The National Prayer of Dedication (May 17, 2026): This comes one full moon (a complete cycle) after the appeal to the nation to turn back to God. The National Jubilee of Prayer is the public act of rededicating America back to God (2 Chronicles 7:14). It marks the withdrawal of consent from the 1871 commercial system that quietly gave jurisdiction back to the British maritime system, and the restoration of the 1776 covenant. New Fed Chairman sworn in (May 25, 2026): Kevin Warsh was sworn in under the law of the land, which was clearly signaled by the absence of the gold-fringed flag (indicating Admiralty jurisdiction) and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas administering the oath. Using the Old System to End the Old System The transition touches every area of life: spiritual, legal, and economic. At its core is the replacement of the foreign-controlled, Admiralty Law-based legal and financial system that has long dominated the nation. The legal process that began on Flag Day, June 14, 2025, is now nearing completion. By dismantling this structure, America removes the foundation that protected corruption, debt slavery, and treasonous actors loyal to that system. Resistance from those who benefited from that arrangement is inevitable. The transition will involve a turbulent battle against a deeply entrenched system – the “storm” that will precede the people's new order. Though intense, this period will be swift and necessary to remove the remaining barriers to national sovereignty. While the National Prayer of Dedication was an essential step in establishing who the nation would place itself under, it was not the final legal trigger for America’s new order. Under British Admiralty Law, a shift of this magnitude still requires a visible public “ritual” that demonstrates the people's consent through participation and celebration. One of the oldest tools of the Admiralty system is now being used to secure that approval: “Ordo Ab Chao”. UFC Freedom 250 provides exactly that public spectacle: a high-visibility event on the White House lawn that fulfills the ritual requirement and completes the transition to the New American Order. “Ordo Ab Chao” is the hidden motto of high-level Freemasonry. For those placed in positions of power under their “god” Satan (whom they believe to be the true Savior and Illuminator), it is the blueprint for controlled transformation: create chaos first, then offer a “new order” as the solution. Classic Problem-Reaction-Solution. Their system is designed to engineer or exploit disruption through wars, financial crashes, moral collapse, social division, and fear. Once the people are terrified, confused, and desperate, the controllers step forward with the pre-planned “solution”: their new systems of governance, their rules, their gods. However, because humans were created as powerful sovereigns of the physical realm, these systems cannot be lawfully imposed without the acquiescence of the governed. Their operating philosophy is simple: keep the masses ignorant, entertained, and emotionally invested in the spectacle, and they will unknowingly consent to the changes that follow. To obtain that permission, they stage public spectacles of visible, controlled chaos. When people cheer, participate, and become emotionally invested, their maritime law treats that participation as consent. According to their legal doctrine, “ignorance of the law is no excuse”. Once that consent is obtained, they can roll out the changes that follow. UFC Freedom 250 is using this very same tool - but this time, against the enemy. The spectacle on the White House South Lawn is not directed against the American people. Instead, it is aimed at dismantling the British Admiralty system that has long exercised jurisdiction over America. Through public participation, the event secures visible support for the lawful transition to the New American Order under the law of the land. Instead of using their tool to further bind the American people to their system, it is being used to bring that system to an end. The Symbolism of UFC Freedom 250 UFC Freedom 250 is the dramatic event that creates a major spectacle. It is classic staged Ordo Ab Chaos. A highly visible event placed on the White House South Lawn, the center of American power. The two main events: • Main Event (Lightweight Title): Ilia Topuria (undefeated foreign champion) vs. Justin Gaethje (American interim champion). • Co-Main (Heavyweight Interim Title): Alex Pereira (Brazilian) vs. Ciryl Gane (French) — two foreign fighters. While the heavyweight division represents the foreign established powers battling for control, the lightweight division represents the common people. An American fighter in the main event on sovereign land symbolizes the American people entering the final stage of the conflict on their own ground. The octagon cage, where the fights take place, sits on the South Lawn — sovereign American land, not corporate territory. This is the same ground where the King and Queen stood as legal witnesses only weeks earlier. A “fight” inside the cage becomes the perfect public ritual: visible, emotional chaos that the crowd can cheer for. In this symbolic battle, the American crowd’s loud support for Gaethje goes far beyond enthusiasm. By pouring their energy into the American fighter on sovereign American soil, the people, whether aware or not, are symbolically choosing the new land-based American Order over the foreign maritime system. Their cheers act as acquiescence - the people’s approval of the transition and acceptance of the storm that accompanies it. That consent makes the shift out of the old system lawful. The Remaining Events Related to America's Restored Sovereignty Several key events still remain in the process of restoring American sovereignty and completing the transition to the law of the land. UFC Freedom 250 on Flag Day (June 14, 2026): Exactly one year after June 14, 2025 when the legal process of removing Admiralty (maritime) Law and restoring the law of the land began publicly, the American people will deliver their loud consent through Ordo Ab Chao on sovereign land. This allows for the transition that introduces the new system for the people. G7 Meeting (June 15 to 17, 2026): Immediately afterward, President Trump will present the American People’s newly accepted New Order, including the storm that follows, to the G7 leaders. These leaders represent the main powers of that old system. In their legal and ritual rulebook, a major international system cannot be dissolved in private. Trump’s presence delivers formal, in-person notice that America is exiting the old Admiralty system and activating the new land-based system. This forces their acknowledgment and prevents any future legal or ritual challenge. Trump’s “Rally to End All Rallies” (June 24, 2026): This serves as a victory lap that publicly celebrates the people’s consent after formal notice has been given. Military bands will emphasize land-based authority, reinforcing the shift from maritime to law of the land power. The performance of Nessun Dorma (“None Shall Sleep”), the famous dramatic aria from The Sum of All Fears, was played during the mass execution of traitors and Deep State figures. With the people’s permission now granted for the necessary storm, the old system’s protectors “shall sleep no more” as justice proceeds and their protections are removed. The Great American State Fair (June 25, 2026 to July 10, 2026): A massive, joyous celebration stretching from the Capitol to the Washington Monument. Through exhibits, pavilions, performances, and family events, the nation will publicly rejoice in the people’s consent to end the old system, restore the law of the land, and return the nation to God's jurisdiction: the beginning of America’s Golden Age. Independence Day's 250th Anniversary (July 4, 2026): July 4, 1776 marked America’s public declaration of independence from British rule and its placement under God's jurisdiction on the land. That independence was later quietly reversed through the 1871 municipal corporation of DC, placing the nation back under British Admiralty Law. On the 250th anniversary, America completes the lawful process of reversing that quiet reversal. This is not merely a celebration - it marks the symbolic and legal completion of the return to the original 1776 covenant and the full restoration of the law of the land under God’s jurisdiction. The Storm The public ceremony is only the beginning. What follows is the storm. Some may question how it can be right to move forward without the people’s full knowledge of these events. Why not simply tell everyone the truth? Americans already know what they need to know. They understand that the system is broken and corruption is rampant. What they don’t understand is that their permission must still be obtained through the rituals of the very Admiralty Law system most are unaware even exists. Rather than trying to educate the entire nation on that hidden system – which many would dismiss as conspiracy theory or outright impossible - the President is using the enemy's own rules against it for the benefit of the people he has been elected to serve. The storm begins when the existing system starts losing its legal and economic control. Yet the storm is more than their resistance. It is the process by which the new system displaces the old one. Those who built their wealth, influence, and power within the existing structure will suddenly find that the protections they relied upon are no longer there. Corruption will be exposed, long-protected bad actors will face accountability, and the legal, financial, and institutional foundations of the old system will be dismantled and replaced with the New American Order. This is the true meaning of Ordo Ab Chao. The difference is that it’s not being used to enslave the people. It's being used to dismantle the very structure that enslaved them. UFC Freedom 250 is therefore more than a sporting event. It serves as the symbolic moment when the people give their approval to the transition and to the storm that accompanies it. Though intense, the storm will be swift, as the enemy's moves have already been anticipated in order to minimize its effects. This is not only for the benefit of the American people and economy, but for the world as a whole, as the consequences of such a transition will be felt far beyond America's borders. What follows is the dawn of a new era. America will begin healing under the law of the land, restored to its rightful place under God’s jurisdiction. Other nations will soon follow. This is Order Out of Chaos, but for a free people under God.

Paul White Gold Eagle

118,567 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Arrests of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan and former New Mexico Doña Ana County Magistrate Judge Joel Cano Democrat Morons Unleash Rogue & Criminal Judges: A Maniacal Leftist Plot to Shield Criminals and Defy Trump The United States is witnessing a judicial meltdown of epic proportions, where a cabal of deranged, leftist activist judges—drunk on their own power and riddled with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS)—are waging an unhinged war against President Donald Trump’s mandate to restore order, secure the border, and purge the nation of waste, fraud, and illegal immigration. Elected by millions of Americans to steer the country back from the brink, Trump’s agenda to prioritize citizens, dismantle criminal networks, and enforce the rule of law is being sabotaged at every turn by a lunatic left and their Democrat lackeys, who, now politically impotent, have turned to the courts as their last bastion of resistance. These rogue judges, cloaked in robes but acting like political operatives, are not only issuing absurd nationwide injunctions to block Trump’s lawful policies but, in a shocking descent into criminality, some are now actively aiding and abetting violent illegal aliens—wife-beaters, woman-beaters, gangbangers, rapists, murderers, and worse—to evade justice. The recent arrests of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan and former New Mexico Magistrate Judge Joel Cano, along with his wife Nancy, expose the depths of this madness, revealing a judiciary infected by a toxic leftist ideology that threatens America’s safety, sovereignty, and democratic will. The Arrests: Deranged Judges Turning Criminal to Protect Criminals The arrests of Judge Hannah Dugan and former Judge Joel Cano are not mere isolated incidents but glaring symptoms of a judiciary gone rogue and crazy, where leftist ideology has warped the rule of law into a twisted shield for criminals. In Milwaukee, on April 25, 2025, FBI agents apprehended Judge Dugan, a sitting judge, for obstructing an immigration operation and concealing an individual to prevent arrest. Her crime? Allegedly helping Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a Mexican national and previously deported illegal immigrant, dodge ICE agents waiting to detain him after a court appearance on April 18. Flores-Ruiz, charged with misdemeanor battery for a vicious domestic violence assault that left a man and woman hospitalized, was no innocent victim. Yet, Judge Dugan, in a brazen act of defiance, reportedly became “visibly angry” upon learning of ICE’s presence, confronted agents, demanded they consult the chief judge, and then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his attorney through a restricted jury door to evade capture. This sparked a dangerous foot chase, endangering agents and the public, before Flores-Ruiz was finally apprehended. You really can't make this stuff up—it's like Judge Dugan saw too many Hollywood cop movies and thought that she would make a better villain judge. Meanwhile, in New Mexico, former Judge Joel Cano and his wife Nancy were arrested on April 24, 2025, for tampering with evidence after allegedly harboring Cristhian Ortega, a suspected Tren de Aragua (TDA) gang member. Following a February 28 raid on their home, where Ortega was found, Judge Cano admitted to smashing Ortega’s cellphone with a hammer and discarding it, believing it contained incriminating photos of Ortega with firearms—evidence that could have mapped TDA’s criminal network or even linked to Venezuelan government ties, bolstering Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act. Judge Cano’s resignation days after the raid reeks of a desperate attempt to dodge accountability, but the FBI’s swift action caught up with him. These judges didn’t just bend the law—they obliterated it, acting as accomplices to violent offenders. Judge Dugan’s actions betrayed domestic violence victims sitting in her courtroom, waiting for justice, while Judge Cano’s destruction of evidence potentially shielded a transnational gang with ties to a hostile regime. Attorney General Pam Bondi minced no words: “No one is above the law… If you are destroying evidence, if you are obstructing justice, when you have victims sitting in a courtroom of domestic violence, and you’re escorting a criminal defendant out a back door, it will not be tolerated.” This isn’t judicial discretion; it’s a leftist fever dream where illegal aliens are sanctified as a protected class, elevated above American citizens and the law itself. Leftist Ideology: A Cancer in the Judiciary The actions of Judge Dugan and Judge Cano are the rancid fruit of a leftist ideology that has metastasized within America’s judiciary, turning judges into political crusaders who view themselves as above the law. This ideology, rooted in a delusional belief that illegal immigrants—regardless of their crimes—are inherently victims of an oppressive system, drives these judges to prioritize open borders over public safety. Buck Sexton nailed it: “The Democrats view illegal aliens as inherently a victim class worthy of special support and also a separate set of laws.” This warped mindset, festering in hyper-left law schools and reinforced by Democrat echo chambers, has produced judges who see their robes as licenses to enact radical agendas, not uphold justice. Judge Dugan, a former Legal Aid Society attorney and Catholic Charities director, and Judge Cano, a long-serving magistrate, embody this activist ethos. Their careers, steeped in progressive advocacy, primed them to view immigration enforcement as an affront to their moral superiority. Judge Dugan’s tantrum over ICE’s “absurd” presence and Judge Cano’s destruction of evidence to protect a suspected TDA member reveal a god complex, as Professor Alan Dershowitz described: “Federal judges think they are above the law and above morality. They think that because they’re wearing robes… they’re so peremptory and so outrageous in their conduct.” This arrogance fuels their willingness to break the law, believing their “noble” cause—shielding illegal aliens—justifies any means, even criminal ones. Nationwide Injunctions: Rogue Judges Weaponizing the Bench Beyond these criminal acts, a broader assault on Trump’s agenda comes from federal district judges issuing nationwide injunctions—legal grenades lobbed to halt his immigration policies. These injunctions, often from single, unelected judges in liberal strongholds, block executive actions across the entire country, defying the will of millions who voted for Trump to secure the border and deport criminal aliens. Judges like the corrupt lunatic James Boasberg, a poster child for leftist judicial overreach, have become notorious for such antics, earning Dershowitz’s scorn for their “god complex” and questionable impartiality (Boasberg’s daughter reportedly works for an anti-deportation group). Nationwide injunctions are a legal abomination, lacking any constitutional basis and wielded as political weapons. They’ve targeted Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, invoked in March 2025 to deport suspected TDA members, and other enforcement measures, like the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal Salvadoran migrant who is an MS-13 gangbanger and wife-beater, whom the biased fake news media keep mislabeling as a “Maryland” man. Judges like Paula Xinis in Maryland have chastised the administration, demanding Garcia’s return while ignoring the broader context of Trump’s mandate to prioritize American safety. These injunctions don’t just delay policy—they paralyze it, allowing criminal networks to exploit legal loopholes while Democrat cheerleaders cry about “due process” for gang members and batterers. The damage is catastrophic. Paul Mauro highlighted the operational nightmare: tracking mobile criminals like TDA members is “very hard,” and courthouse arrests are critical when they “pop in the computer” for state charges. By obstructing ICE, judges like Dugan create chaos, forcing dangerous chases and risking public safety. Judge Cano’s destruction of evidence potentially hid TDA’s ties to the Venezuelan government, undermining Trump’s claim of a “hybrid criminal state” infiltration—a claim that, if proven, validates the Alien Enemies Act’s use. Every injunction, every act of judicial sabotage, emboldens criminal networks, erodes border security, and betrays American citizens. The Lunatic Left and Democrat Morons: A Desperate Power Grab The lunatic left and their Democrat morons, humiliated by Trump’s landslide victory, are in full meltdown, clinging to the courts as their last hope to thwart the American people’s will. Milwaukee’s mayor, Cavalier Johnson, had the gall to claim Judge Dugan’s arrest “scares residents from coming to court,” as if protecting a domestic abuser is a public service. Imbecilic senators like Dick Durbin, Tina Smith, and Tammy Baldwin wailed about “judicial independence” and “constitutional limits,” conveniently ignoring the victims left in the wake of their pet judges’ actions. Their hypocrisy is nauseating: they chant “No One is Above The Law” when targeting Trump but clutch their pearls when their insane activist judges face cuffs for aiding criminals. This is a desperate power grab by a defeated ideology. The left’s open-borders dogma, which Sexton aptly called a belief that America should “take in criminals from all the rest of the world,” has no electoral legs, so they’ve outsourced their fight to deranged activist rogue judges. These judicial stooges, backed by Democrat whining, are willing to risk America’s safety to score political points, even if it means harboring gangbangers or letting wife-beaters slip away. Their actions scream contempt for the voters who chose Trump to clean house, deport criminals, and restore sanity. The Damage to America The consequences of this judicial insanity are dire. First, it undermines public safety. By shielding violent illegal aliens, judges like Dugan and Cano embolden criminals, leaving communities vulnerable to assaults, gang activity, and worse. The TDA, with its alleged Venezuelan government ties, isn’t a petty street gang—it’s a transnational threat that thrives on judicial leniency. Second, it erodes trust in the judiciary. When activist judges act like leftist vigilantes, breaking laws or issuing baseless injunctions, they tarnish the bench’s credibility, turning courts into political battlegrounds. Third, it delays Trump’s agenda, stalling deportations, border security, and fraud crackdowns that Americans demanded. Every injunction, every obstructed arrest, prolongs the chaos of open borders and unchecked crime. Worst of all, this judicial rebellion defies democracy itself. Trump’s election was a clear mandate to fix the mess left by years of leftist policies. By using nationwide injunctions and criminal acts to block him, these crooked, rogue and even criminal judges are spitting in the face of millions, acting as unelected overlords who think they know better than the people. If unchecked, their antics could destabilize the nation, fueling resentment and fracturing the rule of law they claim to uphold. It's Urgent to Crush the Madness The arrests of Judge Dugan and Judge Cano are a wake-up call: the Trump administration must double down, rooting out these unhinged rogue judges with the full force of the law. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel are sending a message: “If you are harboring a fugitive, we don’t care who you are.” Good. It’s time to dismantle the leftist stranglehold on the judiciary, starting with prosecuting those who cross into criminality and reforming the system to curb abuses like nationwide injunctions. The lunatic left and their Democrat morons can screech all they want—their time is up. America voted for Trump to drain the swamp, secure the border, and put citizens first. No deranged judge, no matter how lofty their perch, should stand in the way. The rule of law must prevail, and these judicial tyrants must face the consequences of their betrayal.
10:47

The Arrests of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan and former New Mexico Doña Ana County Magistrate Judge Joel Cano Democrat Morons Unleash Rogue & Criminal Judges: A Maniacal Leftist Plot to Shield Criminals and Defy Trump The United States is witnessing a judicial meltdown of epic proportions, where a cabal of deranged, leftist activist judges—drunk on their own power and riddled with Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS)—are waging an unhinged war against President Donald Trump’s mandate to restore order, secure the border, and purge the nation of waste, fraud, and illegal immigration. Elected by millions of Americans to steer the country back from the brink, Trump’s agenda to prioritize citizens, dismantle criminal networks, and enforce the rule of law is being sabotaged at every turn by a lunatic left and their Democrat lackeys, who, now politically impotent, have turned to the courts as their last bastion of resistance. These rogue judges, cloaked in robes but acting like political operatives, are not only issuing absurd nationwide injunctions to block Trump’s lawful policies but, in a shocking descent into criminality, some are now actively aiding and abetting violent illegal aliens—wife-beaters, woman-beaters, gangbangers, rapists, murderers, and worse—to evade justice. The recent arrests of Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan and former New Mexico Magistrate Judge Joel Cano, along with his wife Nancy, expose the depths of this madness, revealing a judiciary infected by a toxic leftist ideology that threatens America’s safety, sovereignty, and democratic will. The Arrests: Deranged Judges Turning Criminal to Protect Criminals The arrests of Judge Hannah Dugan and former Judge Joel Cano are not mere isolated incidents but glaring symptoms of a judiciary gone rogue and crazy, where leftist ideology has warped the rule of law into a twisted shield for criminals. In Milwaukee, on April 25, 2025, FBI agents apprehended Judge Dugan, a sitting judge, for obstructing an immigration operation and concealing an individual to prevent arrest. Her crime? Allegedly helping Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a Mexican national and previously deported illegal immigrant, dodge ICE agents waiting to detain him after a court appearance on April 18. Flores-Ruiz, charged with misdemeanor battery for a vicious domestic violence assault that left a man and woman hospitalized, was no innocent victim. Yet, Judge Dugan, in a brazen act of defiance, reportedly became “visibly angry” upon learning of ICE’s presence, confronted agents, demanded they consult the chief judge, and then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his attorney through a restricted jury door to evade capture. This sparked a dangerous foot chase, endangering agents and the public, before Flores-Ruiz was finally apprehended. You really can't make this stuff up—it's like Judge Dugan saw too many Hollywood cop movies and thought that she would make a better villain judge. Meanwhile, in New Mexico, former Judge Joel Cano and his wife Nancy were arrested on April 24, 2025, for tampering with evidence after allegedly harboring Cristhian Ortega, a suspected Tren de Aragua (TDA) gang member. Following a February 28 raid on their home, where Ortega was found, Judge Cano admitted to smashing Ortega’s cellphone with a hammer and discarding it, believing it contained incriminating photos of Ortega with firearms—evidence that could have mapped TDA’s criminal network or even linked to Venezuelan government ties, bolstering Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act. Judge Cano’s resignation days after the raid reeks of a desperate attempt to dodge accountability, but the FBI’s swift action caught up with him. These judges didn’t just bend the law—they obliterated it, acting as accomplices to violent offenders. Judge Dugan’s actions betrayed domestic violence victims sitting in her courtroom, waiting for justice, while Judge Cano’s destruction of evidence potentially shielded a transnational gang with ties to a hostile regime. Attorney General Pam Bondi minced no words: “No one is above the law… If you are destroying evidence, if you are obstructing justice, when you have victims sitting in a courtroom of domestic violence, and you’re escorting a criminal defendant out a back door, it will not be tolerated.” This isn’t judicial discretion; it’s a leftist fever dream where illegal aliens are sanctified as a protected class, elevated above American citizens and the law itself. Leftist Ideology: A Cancer in the Judiciary The actions of Judge Dugan and Judge Cano are the rancid fruit of a leftist ideology that has metastasized within America’s judiciary, turning judges into political crusaders who view themselves as above the law. This ideology, rooted in a delusional belief that illegal immigrants—regardless of their crimes—are inherently victims of an oppressive system, drives these judges to prioritize open borders over public safety. Buck Sexton nailed it: “The Democrats view illegal aliens as inherently a victim class worthy of special support and also a separate set of laws.” This warped mindset, festering in hyper-left law schools and reinforced by Democrat echo chambers, has produced judges who see their robes as licenses to enact radical agendas, not uphold justice. Judge Dugan, a former Legal Aid Society attorney and Catholic Charities director, and Judge Cano, a long-serving magistrate, embody this activist ethos. Their careers, steeped in progressive advocacy, primed them to view immigration enforcement as an affront to their moral superiority. Judge Dugan’s tantrum over ICE’s “absurd” presence and Judge Cano’s destruction of evidence to protect a suspected TDA member reveal a god complex, as Professor Alan Dershowitz described: “Federal judges think they are above the law and above morality. They think that because they’re wearing robes… they’re so peremptory and so outrageous in their conduct.” This arrogance fuels their willingness to break the law, believing their “noble” cause—shielding illegal aliens—justifies any means, even criminal ones. Nationwide Injunctions: Rogue Judges Weaponizing the Bench Beyond these criminal acts, a broader assault on Trump’s agenda comes from federal district judges issuing nationwide injunctions—legal grenades lobbed to halt his immigration policies. These injunctions, often from single, unelected judges in liberal strongholds, block executive actions across the entire country, defying the will of millions who voted for Trump to secure the border and deport criminal aliens. Judges like the corrupt lunatic James Boasberg, a poster child for leftist judicial overreach, have become notorious for such antics, earning Dershowitz’s scorn for their “god complex” and questionable impartiality (Boasberg’s daughter reportedly works for an anti-deportation group). Nationwide injunctions are a legal abomination, lacking any constitutional basis and wielded as political weapons. They’ve targeted Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, invoked in March 2025 to deport suspected TDA members, and other enforcement measures, like the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an illegal Salvadoran migrant who is an MS-13 gangbanger and wife-beater, whom the biased fake news media keep mislabeling as a “Maryland” man. Judges like Paula Xinis in Maryland have chastised the administration, demanding Garcia’s return while ignoring the broader context of Trump’s mandate to prioritize American safety. These injunctions don’t just delay policy—they paralyze it, allowing criminal networks to exploit legal loopholes while Democrat cheerleaders cry about “due process” for gang members and batterers. The damage is catastrophic. Paul Mauro highlighted the operational nightmare: tracking mobile criminals like TDA members is “very hard,” and courthouse arrests are critical when they “pop in the computer” for state charges. By obstructing ICE, judges like Dugan create chaos, forcing dangerous chases and risking public safety. Judge Cano’s destruction of evidence potentially hid TDA’s ties to the Venezuelan government, undermining Trump’s claim of a “hybrid criminal state” infiltration—a claim that, if proven, validates the Alien Enemies Act’s use. Every injunction, every act of judicial sabotage, emboldens criminal networks, erodes border security, and betrays American citizens. The Lunatic Left and Democrat Morons: A Desperate Power Grab The lunatic left and their Democrat morons, humiliated by Trump’s landslide victory, are in full meltdown, clinging to the courts as their last hope to thwart the American people’s will. Milwaukee’s mayor, Cavalier Johnson, had the gall to claim Judge Dugan’s arrest “scares residents from coming to court,” as if protecting a domestic abuser is a public service. Imbecilic senators like Dick Durbin, Tina Smith, and Tammy Baldwin wailed about “judicial independence” and “constitutional limits,” conveniently ignoring the victims left in the wake of their pet judges’ actions. Their hypocrisy is nauseating: they chant “No One is Above The Law” when targeting Trump but clutch their pearls when their insane activist judges face cuffs for aiding criminals. This is a desperate power grab by a defeated ideology. The left’s open-borders dogma, which Sexton aptly called a belief that America should “take in criminals from all the rest of the world,” has no electoral legs, so they’ve outsourced their fight to deranged activist rogue judges. These judicial stooges, backed by Democrat whining, are willing to risk America’s safety to score political points, even if it means harboring gangbangers or letting wife-beaters slip away. Their actions scream contempt for the voters who chose Trump to clean house, deport criminals, and restore sanity. The Damage to America The consequences of this judicial insanity are dire. First, it undermines public safety. By shielding violent illegal aliens, judges like Dugan and Cano embolden criminals, leaving communities vulnerable to assaults, gang activity, and worse. The TDA, with its alleged Venezuelan government ties, isn’t a petty street gang—it’s a transnational threat that thrives on judicial leniency. Second, it erodes trust in the judiciary. When activist judges act like leftist vigilantes, breaking laws or issuing baseless injunctions, they tarnish the bench’s credibility, turning courts into political battlegrounds. Third, it delays Trump’s agenda, stalling deportations, border security, and fraud crackdowns that Americans demanded. Every injunction, every obstructed arrest, prolongs the chaos of open borders and unchecked crime. Worst of all, this judicial rebellion defies democracy itself. Trump’s election was a clear mandate to fix the mess left by years of leftist policies. By using nationwide injunctions and criminal acts to block him, these crooked, rogue and even criminal judges are spitting in the face of millions, acting as unelected overlords who think they know better than the people. If unchecked, their antics could destabilize the nation, fueling resentment and fracturing the rule of law they claim to uphold. It's Urgent to Crush the Madness The arrests of Judge Dugan and Judge Cano are a wake-up call: the Trump administration must double down, rooting out these unhinged rogue judges with the full force of the law. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel are sending a message: “If you are harboring a fugitive, we don’t care who you are.” Good. It’s time to dismantle the leftist stranglehold on the judiciary, starting with prosecuting those who cross into criminality and reforming the system to curb abuses like nationwide injunctions. The lunatic left and their Democrat morons can screech all they want—their time is up. America voted for Trump to drain the swamp, secure the border, and put citizens first. No deranged judge, no matter how lofty their perch, should stand in the way. The rule of law must prevail, and these judicial tyrants must face the consequences of their betrayal.

Raymond Ng

64,284 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

They Knew It Had Collapsed: How Oldham Council Hid the Truth About Its Grooming Gang Inquiry For months, council leaders knew the town's promised inquiry into child sexual exploitation was dead. They just didn't tell the people of Oldham. Last night's full meeting of Oldham Council descended into the familiar charade. Fifteen minutes had been allocated for public questions, supposedly a chance for residents to hold their representatives to account. Instead, almost the entire slot was consumed by former Labour councillors and party activists, a tactic designed to run down the clock and shut out scrutiny. Only through Councillor Wilkinson's insistence was the chamber forced to confront what everyone else was avoiding. He demanded the rules be suspended so a response could finally be given to the question that cut to the heart of public concern: what happened to Oldham's promised inquiry into the Pakistani Rape Gangs? After visible hesitation, the Mayor agreed. Council Leader Arooj Shah rose to respond, immediately distancing herself from what followed. She claimed she wasn't personally involved and also how her pre prepared statement she was about to read had been written by officers of the council. Shah read from her script: "In January this year, following the government's announcement of support for five local inquiries into child sexual exploitation, Oldham Council began the process of commissioning its own inquiry, including engaging with Tom K. Crowther KC as its potential chair. However, while this work was underway, in June, Baroness Casey published the outcome of her audit on group-based child sexual exploitation, recommending a national inquiry that would include targeted local investigations. Conversations with the Home Office then focused on whether Oldham's local inquiry should instead form part of the national inquiry, which would carry additional legal powers. An update was provided to survivors explaining that this process was underway and was likely to take some time. We continue to await confirmation from the Home Office of the proposed chair of the national inquiry and Oldham's position within it. Officers have requested an update and timescales for when this information will be available. We will continue to seek the best outcome to ensure survivors have their testimony heard and get the answers they deserve." Strip away the bureaucratic language about "awaiting confirmation" and "ongoing conversations" and the truth becomes clear: the Oldham rape gang inquiry no longer exists. It was quietly abandoned months ago when the council halted its work after Baroness Casey's June report. For five months, silence. No progress. No transparency. No communication with survivors or the public. For five months, the Pakistani Gangster endorsed Labour Party run Oldham Council has known that its independent inquiry, the one promised to victims of grooming gangs and to the people of this town, had been scrapped. Yet not once did the council leader or her administration publicly admit it. _________ The truth is Arooj Shah had the opportunity to make this clear at the start of last night's meeting. She chose not to. Her pre prepared statement was only dragged into the open at the final moment, forced out by intervention from the Reform UK councillor, Mark Wilkinson. _________ The timing, the obfuscation, the pre-written response by unnamed officers all points to a leadership desperate to distance itself from responsibility for another betrayal of survivors. This is the same Arooj Shah who has repeatedly voted against motions calling for a public inquiry into the Pakistani Rape Gangs. Now she presides over the quiet burial of Oldham's own. _________ The Cover-Up Continues The cover-up hasn't ended; it's simply changed shape. Oldham's Labour-run council now hides behind the convenient excuse that it must "await confirmation" from the Labour-run Home Office. One arm of the same political machine pretending to wait for permission from another. It isn't governance - it's choreography. Both institutions have known for months that the Oldham inquiry is dead. Instead of admitting the collapse, they've chosen silence, leaving survivors and residents to believe that justice is merely delayed when in truth it's been quietly buried. Every day that passes without transparency is another day of deceit. Bureaucratic language and political spin shield those who failed the most vulnerable children in our town. This isn't incompetence. It's intent. Public declarations record Shah's association with the convicted heroin dealer and cop killer geyaway driver "Irish Immy", while court documents confirm that Shah's own brother was convicted of money-laundering offences. That is before of her associations with a convicted kidnapper and torturer. No, I'm not making any of this up. These links deepen public concern that Oldham's leadership sits far too close to the very networks that have long blighted the town. What's being protected isn't just the Labour Party, it's the entire web of influence that keeps Oldham's establishment insulated from accountability. The council, the police, the local party machine, their associates in business and criminality. Every one of them has a stake in keeping this story buried. This isn't about politics anymore. It's about preservation - a ruling clique defending its own survival, even if it means abandoning the very people they swore to protect. Oldham doesn't need silence. It needs truth. And what is happening in Oldham is also happening across the United Kingdom where the Pakistani Cartels and Islamists have infiltrated our democracy. ___________ The pattern is identical in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Newcastle and many other places. Deny the truth. Attack the critics. Protect reputations. Claim credit when the truth finally emerges. This is not only a CSE scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. The country is beginning to wake up. The truth is no longer theirs to control. This inquiry didn't happen because the government suddenly found its moral compass. It was dragged into existence by survivors who wouldn't shut up, whistleblowers who refused to disappear, and a public tired of being lied to. For years, they fought against it. Now they'll fight to control it. The whitewash has already begun. The only question is whether we let them get away with it? I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. We cannot do this on our own. We need you to stand with us and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash. We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. - Raja Miah MBE
4:18

They Knew It Had Collapsed: How Oldham Council Hid the Truth About Its Grooming Gang Inquiry For months, council leaders knew the town's promised inquiry into child sexual exploitation was dead. They just didn't tell the people of Oldham. Last night's full meeting of Oldham Council descended into the familiar charade. Fifteen minutes had been allocated for public questions, supposedly a chance for residents to hold their representatives to account. Instead, almost the entire slot was consumed by former Labour councillors and party activists, a tactic designed to run down the clock and shut out scrutiny. Only through Councillor Wilkinson's insistence was the chamber forced to confront what everyone else was avoiding. He demanded the rules be suspended so a response could finally be given to the question that cut to the heart of public concern: what happened to Oldham's promised inquiry into the Pakistani Rape Gangs? After visible hesitation, the Mayor agreed. Council Leader Arooj Shah rose to respond, immediately distancing herself from what followed. She claimed she wasn't personally involved and also how her pre prepared statement she was about to read had been written by officers of the council. Shah read from her script: "In January this year, following the government's announcement of support for five local inquiries into child sexual exploitation, Oldham Council began the process of commissioning its own inquiry, including engaging with Tom K. Crowther KC as its potential chair. However, while this work was underway, in June, Baroness Casey published the outcome of her audit on group-based child sexual exploitation, recommending a national inquiry that would include targeted local investigations. Conversations with the Home Office then focused on whether Oldham's local inquiry should instead form part of the national inquiry, which would carry additional legal powers. An update was provided to survivors explaining that this process was underway and was likely to take some time. We continue to await confirmation from the Home Office of the proposed chair of the national inquiry and Oldham's position within it. Officers have requested an update and timescales for when this information will be available. We will continue to seek the best outcome to ensure survivors have their testimony heard and get the answers they deserve." Strip away the bureaucratic language about "awaiting confirmation" and "ongoing conversations" and the truth becomes clear: the Oldham rape gang inquiry no longer exists. It was quietly abandoned months ago when the council halted its work after Baroness Casey's June report. For five months, silence. No progress. No transparency. No communication with survivors or the public. For five months, the Pakistani Gangster endorsed Labour Party run Oldham Council has known that its independent inquiry, the one promised to victims of grooming gangs and to the people of this town, had been scrapped. Yet not once did the council leader or her administration publicly admit it. _________ The truth is Arooj Shah had the opportunity to make this clear at the start of last night's meeting. She chose not to. Her pre prepared statement was only dragged into the open at the final moment, forced out by intervention from the Reform UK councillor, Mark Wilkinson. _________ The timing, the obfuscation, the pre-written response by unnamed officers all points to a leadership desperate to distance itself from responsibility for another betrayal of survivors. This is the same Arooj Shah who has repeatedly voted against motions calling for a public inquiry into the Pakistani Rape Gangs. Now she presides over the quiet burial of Oldham's own. _________ The Cover-Up Continues The cover-up hasn't ended; it's simply changed shape. Oldham's Labour-run council now hides behind the convenient excuse that it must "await confirmation" from the Labour-run Home Office. One arm of the same political machine pretending to wait for permission from another. It isn't governance - it's choreography. Both institutions have known for months that the Oldham inquiry is dead. Instead of admitting the collapse, they've chosen silence, leaving survivors and residents to believe that justice is merely delayed when in truth it's been quietly buried. Every day that passes without transparency is another day of deceit. Bureaucratic language and political spin shield those who failed the most vulnerable children in our town. This isn't incompetence. It's intent. Public declarations record Shah's association with the convicted heroin dealer and cop killer geyaway driver "Irish Immy", while court documents confirm that Shah's own brother was convicted of money-laundering offences. That is before of her associations with a convicted kidnapper and torturer. No, I'm not making any of this up. These links deepen public concern that Oldham's leadership sits far too close to the very networks that have long blighted the town. What's being protected isn't just the Labour Party, it's the entire web of influence that keeps Oldham's establishment insulated from accountability. The council, the police, the local party machine, their associates in business and criminality. Every one of them has a stake in keeping this story buried. This isn't about politics anymore. It's about preservation - a ruling clique defending its own survival, even if it means abandoning the very people they swore to protect. Oldham doesn't need silence. It needs truth. And what is happening in Oldham is also happening across the United Kingdom where the Pakistani Cartels and Islamists have infiltrated our democracy. ___________ The pattern is identical in Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, Newcastle and many other places. Deny the truth. Attack the critics. Protect reputations. Claim credit when the truth finally emerges. This is not only a CSE scandal. It is a crisis of truth, trust and governance in modern Britain. The country is beginning to wake up. The truth is no longer theirs to control. This inquiry didn't happen because the government suddenly found its moral compass. It was dragged into existence by survivors who wouldn't shut up, whistleblowers who refused to disappear, and a public tired of being lied to. For years, they fought against it. Now they'll fight to control it. The whitewash has already begun. The only question is whether we let them get away with it? I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. We cannot do this on our own. We need you to stand with us and help make sure the National Inquiry we have all fought for is not a whitewash. We’re running out of time. Without the numbers, they will win. It’s as simple as that. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. - Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

62,345 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:
46:01

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Prasad

277,785 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ছিলাম, আছি, থাকব শান্তির সাথে বাঁচব, উন্নয়নের সাথে বাঁচব, সম্প্রীতির সাথে বাঁচব, সবাইকে নিয়ে বাঁচব। It was my honour to address the Ma, Mati, Manush of Murshidabad whose soil carries the memory of the last great battle before India fell to colonial rule. This land has shaped Bengal’s political, cultural, and spiritual fabric, and once stood as the seat of administration for our State. Within our limited resources, we have worked with full sincerity for the comprehensive development of Murshidabad. We have invested ₹900 crore across 189 development projects. At Sagardighi, a 660-MW supercritical power plant, the first of its kind in eastern India, is set to become operational on December 10. Built at a cost of ₹4,567 crore, it will supply uninterrupted power to 16.7 lakh families and create 26,000 jobs. Six anti-erosion projects along the Ganga–Padma stretch in Shamsherganj and Dhuliyan have been undertaken at a cost of ₹69 crore. An additional ₹136 crore has already been spent statewide on preventing riverbank erosion, with a total allocation of ₹200 crore earmarked for this critical work. Murshidabad’s iconic ‘Chhanabora’ has received a GI tag. Instead of acknowledging Bengal’s progress, the Mir Jafars in Delhi, unable to earn people’s trust and incapable of competing with us politically, have left no avenue unexplored to punish our people. Bengal’s rightful dues worth nearly ₹2 lakh crore have been choked off. They have repeatedly undermined the cultural and civilisational icons who define our national consciousness. They are systematically attempting to erase Bengali language and identity. They have even banned ‘Vande Mataram’ on Rajya Sabha premises. Bengali-speaking migrant workers are being harassed, detained, humiliated, and illegally deported; even pregnant women are not spared. Now, in the same authoritarian spirit as demonetisation, CAA-NRC, they have unleashed the SIR purge to manipulate electoral rolls and tilt the scales. More than 40 people have lost their lives under the crushing pressure of this relentless exercise. Today, I met the families of four individuals who died in SIR-induced panic, conveyed my condolences, and assured them that we stand firmly by their side. The families of those who lost their lives due to SIR have been provided ₹2 lakh each, and those who are hospitalised have been given ₹1 lakh each. If they had courage or integrity, they would have conducted SIR two years earlier. Elections are taking place in four States, but SIR is only being conducted where Opposition governments are in power. Why not Assam? Why not Tripura? Are they not border States? Why not Mizoram, Manipur, or Nagaland, where Rohingya infiltration actually occurs? Their selective targeting exposes their political malice. But we will not allow their conspiracy to succeed. We have launched ‘May I Help You’ camps at every booth to ensure that not a single legitimate voter is disenfranchised. Until the last citizen submits his or her enumeration form, I will not submit mine. I stand as their custodian. The ruling party at the Centre survives by manufacturing hatred and division. These ‘Dangebaaz’ want to inject communal venom, splinter society along religious lines and shatter Bengal’s centuries-old syncretic fabric. As long as I am here, I will never allow that. I respect every faith, every caste, every creed, every class. We are a State that honours every language. But if anyone dares insult the language in which we say “Ma”, if anyone threatens the dignity of my ‘Manush’, if anyone tries to uproot the “Mati” from beneath their feet, then I shall ensure that they are democratically reduced to dust. To the BJP, I say this clearly and without hesitation, "Jo Bengal se takrayega, choor-choor ho jaayega.”
1:51

ছিলাম, আছি, থাকব শান্তির সাথে বাঁচব, উন্নয়নের সাথে বাঁচব, সম্প্রীতির সাথে বাঁচব, সবাইকে নিয়ে বাঁচব। It was my honour to address the Ma, Mati, Manush of Murshidabad whose soil carries the memory of the last great battle before India fell to colonial rule. This land has shaped Bengal’s political, cultural, and spiritual fabric, and once stood as the seat of administration for our State. Within our limited resources, we have worked with full sincerity for the comprehensive development of Murshidabad. We have invested ₹900 crore across 189 development projects. At Sagardighi, a 660-MW supercritical power plant, the first of its kind in eastern India, is set to become operational on December 10. Built at a cost of ₹4,567 crore, it will supply uninterrupted power to 16.7 lakh families and create 26,000 jobs. Six anti-erosion projects along the Ganga–Padma stretch in Shamsherganj and Dhuliyan have been undertaken at a cost of ₹69 crore. An additional ₹136 crore has already been spent statewide on preventing riverbank erosion, with a total allocation of ₹200 crore earmarked for this critical work. Murshidabad’s iconic ‘Chhanabora’ has received a GI tag. Instead of acknowledging Bengal’s progress, the Mir Jafars in Delhi, unable to earn people’s trust and incapable of competing with us politically, have left no avenue unexplored to punish our people. Bengal’s rightful dues worth nearly ₹2 lakh crore have been choked off. They have repeatedly undermined the cultural and civilisational icons who define our national consciousness. They are systematically attempting to erase Bengali language and identity. They have even banned ‘Vande Mataram’ on Rajya Sabha premises. Bengali-speaking migrant workers are being harassed, detained, humiliated, and illegally deported; even pregnant women are not spared. Now, in the same authoritarian spirit as demonetisation, CAA-NRC, they have unleashed the SIR purge to manipulate electoral rolls and tilt the scales. More than 40 people have lost their lives under the crushing pressure of this relentless exercise. Today, I met the families of four individuals who died in SIR-induced panic, conveyed my condolences, and assured them that we stand firmly by their side. The families of those who lost their lives due to SIR have been provided ₹2 lakh each, and those who are hospitalised have been given ₹1 lakh each. If they had courage or integrity, they would have conducted SIR two years earlier. Elections are taking place in four States, but SIR is only being conducted where Opposition governments are in power. Why not Assam? Why not Tripura? Are they not border States? Why not Mizoram, Manipur, or Nagaland, where Rohingya infiltration actually occurs? Their selective targeting exposes their political malice. But we will not allow their conspiracy to succeed. We have launched ‘May I Help You’ camps at every booth to ensure that not a single legitimate voter is disenfranchised. Until the last citizen submits his or her enumeration form, I will not submit mine. I stand as their custodian. The ruling party at the Centre survives by manufacturing hatred and division. These ‘Dangebaaz’ want to inject communal venom, splinter society along religious lines and shatter Bengal’s centuries-old syncretic fabric. As long as I am here, I will never allow that. I respect every faith, every caste, every creed, every class. We are a State that honours every language. But if anyone dares insult the language in which we say “Ma”, if anyone threatens the dignity of my ‘Manush’, if anyone tries to uproot the “Mati” from beneath their feet, then I shall ensure that they are democratically reduced to dust. To the BJP, I say this clearly and without hesitation, "Jo Bengal se takrayega, choor-choor ho jaayega.”

Mamata Banerjee

29,125 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 EXPOSED: LIKE CLOCKWORK - CAIR RAN TO THE MEDIA, AND THE MEDIA FELL IN LINE. SHAME ON WVTM 13 (Birmingham): Why Did You Omit CAIR’s Documented Record? Just hours after Senator Tommy Tuberville delivered what many are calling one of the most historic and unapologetic Senate floor speeches in recent memory, the Council on American-Islamic Relations responded exactly as critics have long warned it would. They didn’t rebut the facts. They didn’t address the evidence. They didn’t engage the substance of the warning. Instead, CAIR turned to one of its familiar media allies - and WVTM 13 obliged, framing the story not through the whole legal and historical record, but through CAIR’s preferred narrative. WVTM 13 characterized Tuberville’s warning as “anti-Muslim rhetoric,” closely echoing CAIR talking points while omitting critical context viewers had every right to hear. Viewers were never told that Florida and Texas have formally classified the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as foreign terrorist organizations and transnational criminal organizations, nor were they told what evidence led to those determinations. Instead, CAIR Alabama was handed a microphone, while decades of history, evidence, and federal court records were pushed aside. Let’s be clear about what WVTM 13 failed to disclose. The record on CAIR is well-documented, yet the media said NOTHING!? In the Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism-financing case in U.S. history, federal prosecutors named CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator, identifying it as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s U.S. support network. FBI wiretaps introduced at trial captured CAIR’s founders discussing support for Hamas. A 1991 internal Muslim Brotherhood memorandum, entered into evidence, outlined a “grand jihad” to dismantle Western civilization from within through front groups and civil-rights organizations, a strategy investigators have repeatedly linked to CAIR’s early leadership and mission. DID you know that RAIR Foundation has now exposed that one of the individuals named in that very memorandum is currently operating in Texas, positioning himself to access taxpayer-funded school-choice dollars, demonstrating that the Brotherhood’s strategy is not historical theory, but an active, ongoing operation. (SILENCE FROM TEXAS LEADERS) National-security investigator Chris Gaubatz, who worked inside CAIR’s headquarters, documented the organization’s role as a political influence and messaging apparatus, including congressional outreach and internal coordination - findings supported by federal evidence and never successfully refuted. None of this context appeared in WVTM 13’s report. Instead, viewers were presented with CAIR’s familiar claim that it is merely a civil-rights organization under threat - a claim that federal prosecutors, court records, and multiple national-security investigations have long called into question. This is how information warfare works. When a U.S. Senator finally names the ideology, the networks, and the political cowardice that enabled them, CAIR does not debate - it deflects, and selective media coverage helps sanitize its public record. That is not investigative journalism. That is narrative laundering. Americans are no longer unaware of this pattern. The documentation is public. The omissions are obvious. The dam is breaking - and the media can no longer control the narrative. Keep fighting, Senator Tuberville. Millions of Americans see exactly what is happening. I will continue exposing every media outlet that chooses to shield, sanitize, or launder the records of networks identified by federal investigators and courts as threats to America’s national security.
1:20

🚨 EXPOSED: LIKE CLOCKWORK - CAIR RAN TO THE MEDIA, AND THE MEDIA FELL IN LINE. SHAME ON WVTM 13 (Birmingham): Why Did You Omit CAIR’s Documented Record? Just hours after Senator Tommy Tuberville delivered what many are calling one of the most historic and unapologetic Senate floor speeches in recent memory, the Council on American-Islamic Relations responded exactly as critics have long warned it would. They didn’t rebut the facts. They didn’t address the evidence. They didn’t engage the substance of the warning. Instead, CAIR turned to one of its familiar media allies - and WVTM 13 obliged, framing the story not through the whole legal and historical record, but through CAIR’s preferred narrative. WVTM 13 characterized Tuberville’s warning as “anti-Muslim rhetoric,” closely echoing CAIR talking points while omitting critical context viewers had every right to hear. Viewers were never told that Florida and Texas have formally classified the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as foreign terrorist organizations and transnational criminal organizations, nor were they told what evidence led to those determinations. Instead, CAIR Alabama was handed a microphone, while decades of history, evidence, and federal court records were pushed aside. Let’s be clear about what WVTM 13 failed to disclose. The record on CAIR is well-documented, yet the media said NOTHING!? In the Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism-financing case in U.S. history, federal prosecutors named CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator, identifying it as part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s U.S. support network. FBI wiretaps introduced at trial captured CAIR’s founders discussing support for Hamas. A 1991 internal Muslim Brotherhood memorandum, entered into evidence, outlined a “grand jihad” to dismantle Western civilization from within through front groups and civil-rights organizations, a strategy investigators have repeatedly linked to CAIR’s early leadership and mission. DID you know that RAIR Foundation has now exposed that one of the individuals named in that very memorandum is currently operating in Texas, positioning himself to access taxpayer-funded school-choice dollars, demonstrating that the Brotherhood’s strategy is not historical theory, but an active, ongoing operation. (SILENCE FROM TEXAS LEADERS) National-security investigator Chris Gaubatz, who worked inside CAIR’s headquarters, documented the organization’s role as a political influence and messaging apparatus, including congressional outreach and internal coordination - findings supported by federal evidence and never successfully refuted. None of this context appeared in WVTM 13’s report. Instead, viewers were presented with CAIR’s familiar claim that it is merely a civil-rights organization under threat - a claim that federal prosecutors, court records, and multiple national-security investigations have long called into question. This is how information warfare works. When a U.S. Senator finally names the ideology, the networks, and the political cowardice that enabled them, CAIR does not debate - it deflects, and selective media coverage helps sanitize its public record. That is not investigative journalism. That is narrative laundering. Americans are no longer unaware of this pattern. The documentation is public. The omissions are obvious. The dam is breaking - and the media can no longer control the narrative. Keep fighting, Senator Tuberville. Millions of Americans see exactly what is happening. I will continue exposing every media outlet that chooses to shield, sanitize, or launder the records of networks identified by federal investigators and courts as threats to America’s national security.

Amy Mek

50,049 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The Imperial Crosshairs Move To Cuba, And Other Notes Trump is posting threats to Cuba on his social media platforms, saying that Havana had better start negotiating with Washington now that the US is in control of Venezuela, because their oil supply is going to be cut off. The president said on Truth Social that “Venezuela now has the United States of America, the most powerful military in the World (by far!), to protect them, and protect them we will. THERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA — ZERO! I strongly suggest they make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.” It’s incredible how rapidly the empire has been shoving through longstanding regional domination agendas in the middle east and Latin America since late 2023. Incinerating Gaza. Decapitating Hezbollah. Regime change in Syria. Bombings and regime change ops in Iran. Kidnapping Maduro. Now moving on Cuba. It’s just been grab, grab, grab for the last two plus years. ❖ Trumpers were sold the story that their guy would fight the deep state globalists to benefit ordinary Americans. Now he’s advancing every CIA/neocon agenda known to man in the middle east and Latin America with the goal of global domination as life in the US gets worse and worse. ❖ Don’t worry Americans, in 2028 you can elect a Democrat who will spend their entire administration creating the desperate conditions and strife which cause people to vote for tyrannical Republicans. ❖ Antiwar has an article out titled “Israeli Forces Kill 15 Palestinians, Including Five Children, in Attacks Across Gaza” about a spate of IDF attacks on Thursday. That death toll is noteworthy because that’s the same number of people who were killed in the Bondi Beach shooting last month, but, because they are Palestinian, you haven’t seen any news stories about it. Fifteen people get killed in Sydney during a Hanukkah celebration and it monopolizes the news cycle for days. Fifteen people get killed in Gaza during a so-called “ceasefire” and it barely makes the news. ❖ Fuck Israel, free Palestine. Say it loud and say it often, because you won’t have the right to say it much longer. The more aggressively the Zionists try to stomp out criticism of Israel the more necessary it is to aggressively criticize Israel. Now we’re not just opposing genocidal atrocities, we’re also opposing a direct assault on our own civil rights. ❖ I see some lefty types going “I oppose the US empire AND the Iranian regime!” No, you support the US empire. If you desire the downfall of the Iranian government in today’s present geopolitical reality, then you desire the expansion of US imperial power. It doesn’t matter how much lip service you pay to opposing the US murder machine if in practice you are promoting the agendas of the worst warmongers in the DC swamp. There is at this time no way Tehran can be toppled without the US-centralized empire inserting its rapey fingers into whatever power structure would emerge from the wreckage. When you overthrow a government you leave a power vacuum, and somebody’s going to step into it. There is no clear movement, faction, or successor in Iran that is strong enough to secure power against whichever group the empire throws its support behind, besides the government that presently exists. This means the US empire would necessarily have a very prominent seat at the table in whatever system of government might replace the current one. If you are a western imperialist then this is no problem for you; if you believe the US and its allies should rule the world then there is no contradiction in your desiring regime change in Iran. If you identify as a leftist, an anarchist, or an anti-imperialist however, there is no way to reconcile your worldview with a desire to fulfill the wildest regime change fantasies of every sociopathic intelligence agency and warmongering think tank in the western world. The only way for such a character to avoid the cognitive dissonance of these contradictions would be to pretend they live in an imaginary fantasy land where the Iranian government could be overthrown without benefitting the US empire. The Iranian people just oust their government all on their own, and then set up a free liberal democracy that is entirely sovereign and independent from any external power structure. That’s a fantasy. We do not live in that kind of world. We live in the world that actually exists. It’s not okay to avoid addressing reality like that. You can’t just close your eyes and put your fingers in your ears and pretend the reality of our situation is different from what it actually is while helping to advance immensely consequential agendas driven by the most powerful people in the world. Being an authentic person means being real about reality and having a truth-based relationship with the world as it actually is. I am not suggesting that Iranians do not have legitimate and organic grievances against their government, nor am I suggesting that they should not desire a different system of government for themselves, nor am I suggesting that they should refrain from doing whatever they think is best in their own country. What I am saying is that the westerners who are cheerleading for regime change in Iran are cheerleading for the advancement of the power structure under which they live, which also happens to be the most powerful empire that has ever existed, which also happens to be the most murderous and destructive power structure on earth. Enough with the phony neutrality. As Desmond Tutu said, “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse, and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.” ❖ Reading by Tim Foley:
6:32

The Imperial Crosshairs Move To Cuba, And Other Notes Trump is posting threats to Cuba on his social media platforms, saying that Havana had better start negotiating with Washington now that the US is in control of Venezuela, because their oil supply is going to be cut off. The president said on Truth Social that “Venezuela now has the United States of America, the most powerful military in the World (by far!), to protect them, and protect them we will. THERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR MONEY GOING TO CUBA — ZERO! I strongly suggest they make a deal, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.” It’s incredible how rapidly the empire has been shoving through longstanding regional domination agendas in the middle east and Latin America since late 2023. Incinerating Gaza. Decapitating Hezbollah. Regime change in Syria. Bombings and regime change ops in Iran. Kidnapping Maduro. Now moving on Cuba. It’s just been grab, grab, grab for the last two plus years. ❖ Trumpers were sold the story that their guy would fight the deep state globalists to benefit ordinary Americans. Now he’s advancing every CIA/neocon agenda known to man in the middle east and Latin America with the goal of global domination as life in the US gets worse and worse. ❖ Don’t worry Americans, in 2028 you can elect a Democrat who will spend their entire administration creating the desperate conditions and strife which cause people to vote for tyrannical Republicans. ❖ Antiwar has an article out titled “Israeli Forces Kill 15 Palestinians, Including Five Children, in Attacks Across Gaza” about a spate of IDF attacks on Thursday. That death toll is noteworthy because that’s the same number of people who were killed in the Bondi Beach shooting last month, but, because they are Palestinian, you haven’t seen any news stories about it. Fifteen people get killed in Sydney during a Hanukkah celebration and it monopolizes the news cycle for days. Fifteen people get killed in Gaza during a so-called “ceasefire” and it barely makes the news. ❖ Fuck Israel, free Palestine. Say it loud and say it often, because you won’t have the right to say it much longer. The more aggressively the Zionists try to stomp out criticism of Israel the more necessary it is to aggressively criticize Israel. Now we’re not just opposing genocidal atrocities, we’re also opposing a direct assault on our own civil rights. ❖ I see some lefty types going “I oppose the US empire AND the Iranian regime!” No, you support the US empire. If you desire the downfall of the Iranian government in today’s present geopolitical reality, then you desire the expansion of US imperial power. It doesn’t matter how much lip service you pay to opposing the US murder machine if in practice you are promoting the agendas of the worst warmongers in the DC swamp. There is at this time no way Tehran can be toppled without the US-centralized empire inserting its rapey fingers into whatever power structure would emerge from the wreckage. When you overthrow a government you leave a power vacuum, and somebody’s going to step into it. There is no clear movement, faction, or successor in Iran that is strong enough to secure power against whichever group the empire throws its support behind, besides the government that presently exists. This means the US empire would necessarily have a very prominent seat at the table in whatever system of government might replace the current one. If you are a western imperialist then this is no problem for you; if you believe the US and its allies should rule the world then there is no contradiction in your desiring regime change in Iran. If you identify as a leftist, an anarchist, or an anti-imperialist however, there is no way to reconcile your worldview with a desire to fulfill the wildest regime change fantasies of every sociopathic intelligence agency and warmongering think tank in the western world. The only way for such a character to avoid the cognitive dissonance of these contradictions would be to pretend they live in an imaginary fantasy land where the Iranian government could be overthrown without benefitting the US empire. The Iranian people just oust their government all on their own, and then set up a free liberal democracy that is entirely sovereign and independent from any external power structure. That’s a fantasy. We do not live in that kind of world. We live in the world that actually exists. It’s not okay to avoid addressing reality like that. You can’t just close your eyes and put your fingers in your ears and pretend the reality of our situation is different from what it actually is while helping to advance immensely consequential agendas driven by the most powerful people in the world. Being an authentic person means being real about reality and having a truth-based relationship with the world as it actually is. I am not suggesting that Iranians do not have legitimate and organic grievances against their government, nor am I suggesting that they should not desire a different system of government for themselves, nor am I suggesting that they should refrain from doing whatever they think is best in their own country. What I am saying is that the westerners who are cheerleading for regime change in Iran are cheerleading for the advancement of the power structure under which they live, which also happens to be the most powerful empire that has ever existed, which also happens to be the most murderous and destructive power structure on earth. Enough with the phony neutrality. As Desmond Tutu said, “If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse, and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.” ❖ Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

23,708 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

When legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge retorted, during his constitutional debate with political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo, that Zimbabwe’s Justice Minister, Ziyambi Ziyambi, has never practised law, what is in the attached Herald article is what he was referring to. A Justice Minister devoid of the ability to understand the Constitution he is supposed to guard and uphold. Zimbabwe’s Justice Minister, Ziyambi Ziyambi, has gone ahistorical, insulting Zimbabweans, including the country’s freedom fighters, by claiming that the liberation war was not about one man, one vote, but merely about land restoration rights. Such a claim distorts the historical record and reduces a broad liberation struggle for political rights and majority rule to a single issue. He advances this intellectual propaganda drivel to defend taking away the direct vote to elect a president from citizens, as espoused in his Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3. It shows that he has never read liberation war literature, which consistently emphasised one man one vote as a central pillar of the liberation struggle. Zimbabweans did not go to war merely for land in isolation, they went to war for majority rule, for universal adult suffrage, for one man, one vote. That principle was entrenched in liberation literature, which articulated the clarion call for equal voting rights to justify the struggle that eventually ended minority. Land without political power would have been meaningless. The liberation struggle was about giving black Zimbabweans the authority to choose who governs them, and through that democratic power to determine land policy and every other national question. For the avoidance of doubt, I attach a video below of Robert Mugabe explicitly stating that the liberation struggle was about one man, one vote. This was in 1962. Ziyambia also argues, ridiculously, that you do not need a referendum to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s tenure of office. Ziyambi confirms Mavedzenge’s assertion that he has never practised law, because one cannot separate the length of an election cycle from Presidential term limits as if they exist in different constitutional universes. They are inseparable, and only a bush lawyer would argue otherwise. The moment you extend an election cycle from five to seven years, you are automatically extending the tenure of the sitting President. This is first-year law degree material, and any serious student of constitutional law would understand that altering the duration of a term inevitably affects the term limit framework itself. That is not a neutral administrative adjustment, it is a substantive alteration to how long executive power is held. Section 91(2) of Zimbabwe’s constitution does not operate in a vacuum. It defines how many terms a President may serve, but the Constitution also defines how long each term is. If you stretch the duration of a term, you are materially affecting the term limit framework. You are extending the time a President holds office beyond what voters originally authorised under the existing constitutional order when they cast their vote. This is precisely why Section 328 was crafted with safeguards. It was meant to prevent incumbents from manipulating constitutional provisions, directly or indirectly, to prolong their stay in power. Whether you change the number of terms or the length of each term, the democratic effect is identical, you extend Presidential tenure. How a Minister of Justice fails to grasp that is astonishing. To argue that extending an election cycle does not touch term limits is like arguing that increasing the length of a school year does not affect how long pupils stay in school. It is a distinction without a difference. The 2007 harmonisation argument, which Ziyambi uses in a feeble attempt to defend an illegal constitutional mutilation, is also wildly misplaced. The 2007 adjustment aligned electoral calendars within an already existing constitutional framework. It did not extend the tenure of an incumbent President beyond the mandate voters had already given. There is a qualitative constitutional difference between administrative alignment and tenure extension. It is plain common sense, even before one applies constitutional law analysis. The claim that Ziyambi makes that even extending term limits to three terms would not require a referendum is equally alarming and legally outrageous. Section 328 was specifically designed to stop incumbency advantage and self-serving amendments. Any change that affects how long a President can remain in office, whether by number of terms or by their duration, triggers constitutional safeguards, including a referendum, especially where it benefits a sitting office holder like in this instance. Ziyambi’s attempt to anchor this in the so-called Vision 2030 or Covid-19 disruptions is empty political rhetoric, not constitutional law. Development agendas do not override constitutional protections. If anything, constitutionalism exists precisely to restrain power during moments when governments claim necessity to do so. The whole world knows that this minister, and other deeply corrupt and politically opportunistic elements working with him attempting to push these amendments illegally, are relying on a captured judiciary to pronounce on these issues through the same ridiculous lenses they are using to wrongly interpret the Constitution. That may well happen, but it renders the entire exercise illegitimate and unlawful, and it will ultimately be reversed, if they are able to force it through and attempt to implement it. The whole world is watching, and this may well become someone’s Waterloo if they are not careful. Also, for the avoidance of doubt, I place below a video of former ZANUPF Legal Secretary Patrick Chinamasa explicitly stating that the proposed changes require two referendums. He said this in front of President Emmerson Mnangagwa at a ZANUPF Annual Conference, and there was no objection to what he said. He was speaking in his capacity as ZANUPF Legal Secretary. ZANUPF and its leadership continue to be a laughing stock as they try to navigate a factional fight by attempting to strip and mutilate the Constitution to resolve internal power struggles. Unfortunately, it is not only ZANUPF that is becoming a laughing stock. Our country itself is becoming one, as the rest of the continent and the world watch a Justice Minister and a group of leaders publicly contradict their own Constitution. This simply exposes the depth of incompetence. Even where the intention is manipulative and corrupt, dictators elsewhere attempt such manoeuvres with a degree of legal sophistication. But here, we are being led by a regime full of people who do not even understand the Constitution upon which their authority is supposed to rest. They do not grasp the implications of what they are attempting to do. What serious investor would commit capital to a country where the judiciary pronounces itself in ways that are contrary to the Constitution, the supreme law of the land? It is absolutely ridiculous. We have people who are supposed to be educated publicly ridiculing themselves by articulating positions that are plainly inconsistent with the Constitution, yet insisting that this is what the Constitution provides. It is astonishing to witness how money and power can erode individuals to the point where they are prepared to destroy anything associated with their professional standing, whether intellectually, as scholars, or as lawyers. It is deeply embarrassing to watch this kind of constitutional drama unfolding in 2026. Imagine the level of shamelessness required for the Justice Minister of a republic born out of a war of independence to come out and claim that the republic was born out of a fight that had nothing to do with one man, one vote, that it was merely about land. In other words, he is suggesting that Zimbabweans who do not have land are not yet independent? Is he also implying that those of us without land are not independent? What, then, was the struggle for if it was only about land, which many citizens still do not possess? It would mean that only those who received land are the ones enjoying independence. He does not seem to realise the Pandora’s box he is opening with such shameless and anti-intellectual statements as Justice Minister of a country whose independence came through a protracted liberation struggle in which blood was spilled and thousands of Zimbabweans were killed fighting for one man, one vote. That position was articulated repeatedly, and it exists on record and on video. Now, in an attempt to resolve a factional fight, ZANUPF appears willing to walk back the very historical foundations of the liberation struggle. I never imagined I would live to see the day when a ZANUPF minister would shame not only himself, his party, and his President, but also embarrass the broader Pan-African community by claiming that Zimbabwe’s independence struggle had nothing to do with one man, one vote. By that logic, if Ian Smith had simply given Africans access to land, the war would have ended there. That is the dangerous and ignominious implication of what this minister is now advancing.
2:21

When legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge retorted, during his constitutional debate with political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo, that Zimbabwe’s Justice Minister, Ziyambi Ziyambi, has never practised law, what is in the attached Herald article is what he was referring to. A Justice Minister devoid of the ability to understand the Constitution he is supposed to guard and uphold. Zimbabwe’s Justice Minister, Ziyambi Ziyambi, has gone ahistorical, insulting Zimbabweans, including the country’s freedom fighters, by claiming that the liberation war was not about one man, one vote, but merely about land restoration rights. Such a claim distorts the historical record and reduces a broad liberation struggle for political rights and majority rule to a single issue. He advances this intellectual propaganda drivel to defend taking away the direct vote to elect a president from citizens, as espoused in his Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3. It shows that he has never read liberation war literature, which consistently emphasised one man one vote as a central pillar of the liberation struggle. Zimbabweans did not go to war merely for land in isolation, they went to war for majority rule, for universal adult suffrage, for one man, one vote. That principle was entrenched in liberation literature, which articulated the clarion call for equal voting rights to justify the struggle that eventually ended minority. Land without political power would have been meaningless. The liberation struggle was about giving black Zimbabweans the authority to choose who governs them, and through that democratic power to determine land policy and every other national question. For the avoidance of doubt, I attach a video below of Robert Mugabe explicitly stating that the liberation struggle was about one man, one vote. This was in 1962. Ziyambia also argues, ridiculously, that you do not need a referendum to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s tenure of office. Ziyambi confirms Mavedzenge’s assertion that he has never practised law, because one cannot separate the length of an election cycle from Presidential term limits as if they exist in different constitutional universes. They are inseparable, and only a bush lawyer would argue otherwise. The moment you extend an election cycle from five to seven years, you are automatically extending the tenure of the sitting President. This is first-year law degree material, and any serious student of constitutional law would understand that altering the duration of a term inevitably affects the term limit framework itself. That is not a neutral administrative adjustment, it is a substantive alteration to how long executive power is held. Section 91(2) of Zimbabwe’s constitution does not operate in a vacuum. It defines how many terms a President may serve, but the Constitution also defines how long each term is. If you stretch the duration of a term, you are materially affecting the term limit framework. You are extending the time a President holds office beyond what voters originally authorised under the existing constitutional order when they cast their vote. This is precisely why Section 328 was crafted with safeguards. It was meant to prevent incumbents from manipulating constitutional provisions, directly or indirectly, to prolong their stay in power. Whether you change the number of terms or the length of each term, the democratic effect is identical, you extend Presidential tenure. How a Minister of Justice fails to grasp that is astonishing. To argue that extending an election cycle does not touch term limits is like arguing that increasing the length of a school year does not affect how long pupils stay in school. It is a distinction without a difference. The 2007 harmonisation argument, which Ziyambi uses in a feeble attempt to defend an illegal constitutional mutilation, is also wildly misplaced. The 2007 adjustment aligned electoral calendars within an already existing constitutional framework. It did not extend the tenure of an incumbent President beyond the mandate voters had already given. There is a qualitative constitutional difference between administrative alignment and tenure extension. It is plain common sense, even before one applies constitutional law analysis. The claim that Ziyambi makes that even extending term limits to three terms would not require a referendum is equally alarming and legally outrageous. Section 328 was specifically designed to stop incumbency advantage and self-serving amendments. Any change that affects how long a President can remain in office, whether by number of terms or by their duration, triggers constitutional safeguards, including a referendum, especially where it benefits a sitting office holder like in this instance. Ziyambi’s attempt to anchor this in the so-called Vision 2030 or Covid-19 disruptions is empty political rhetoric, not constitutional law. Development agendas do not override constitutional protections. If anything, constitutionalism exists precisely to restrain power during moments when governments claim necessity to do so. The whole world knows that this minister, and other deeply corrupt and politically opportunistic elements working with him attempting to push these amendments illegally, are relying on a captured judiciary to pronounce on these issues through the same ridiculous lenses they are using to wrongly interpret the Constitution. That may well happen, but it renders the entire exercise illegitimate and unlawful, and it will ultimately be reversed, if they are able to force it through and attempt to implement it. The whole world is watching, and this may well become someone’s Waterloo if they are not careful. Also, for the avoidance of doubt, I place below a video of former ZANUPF Legal Secretary Patrick Chinamasa explicitly stating that the proposed changes require two referendums. He said this in front of President Emmerson Mnangagwa at a ZANUPF Annual Conference, and there was no objection to what he said. He was speaking in his capacity as ZANUPF Legal Secretary. ZANUPF and its leadership continue to be a laughing stock as they try to navigate a factional fight by attempting to strip and mutilate the Constitution to resolve internal power struggles. Unfortunately, it is not only ZANUPF that is becoming a laughing stock. Our country itself is becoming one, as the rest of the continent and the world watch a Justice Minister and a group of leaders publicly contradict their own Constitution. This simply exposes the depth of incompetence. Even where the intention is manipulative and corrupt, dictators elsewhere attempt such manoeuvres with a degree of legal sophistication. But here, we are being led by a regime full of people who do not even understand the Constitution upon which their authority is supposed to rest. They do not grasp the implications of what they are attempting to do. What serious investor would commit capital to a country where the judiciary pronounces itself in ways that are contrary to the Constitution, the supreme law of the land? It is absolutely ridiculous. We have people who are supposed to be educated publicly ridiculing themselves by articulating positions that are plainly inconsistent with the Constitution, yet insisting that this is what the Constitution provides. It is astonishing to witness how money and power can erode individuals to the point where they are prepared to destroy anything associated with their professional standing, whether intellectually, as scholars, or as lawyers. It is deeply embarrassing to watch this kind of constitutional drama unfolding in 2026. Imagine the level of shamelessness required for the Justice Minister of a republic born out of a war of independence to come out and claim that the republic was born out of a fight that had nothing to do with one man, one vote, that it was merely about land. In other words, he is suggesting that Zimbabweans who do not have land are not yet independent? Is he also implying that those of us without land are not independent? What, then, was the struggle for if it was only about land, which many citizens still do not possess? It would mean that only those who received land are the ones enjoying independence. He does not seem to realise the Pandora’s box he is opening with such shameless and anti-intellectual statements as Justice Minister of a country whose independence came through a protracted liberation struggle in which blood was spilled and thousands of Zimbabweans were killed fighting for one man, one vote. That position was articulated repeatedly, and it exists on record and on video. Now, in an attempt to resolve a factional fight, ZANUPF appears willing to walk back the very historical foundations of the liberation struggle. I never imagined I would live to see the day when a ZANUPF minister would shame not only himself, his party, and his President, but also embarrass the broader Pan-African community by claiming that Zimbabwe’s independence struggle had nothing to do with one man, one vote. By that logic, if Ian Smith had simply given Africans access to land, the war would have ended there. That is the dangerous and ignominious implication of what this minister is now advancing.

Hopewell Chin’ono

54,195 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Minister Ahmed Moalim Fiqi Minister of Defense of the Federal Republic of Somalia Defamation of Awdal Defense Forces, and President Ismail Omar Geileh Allegiance Exposure - Minister Fiqi’s Cowardice, Corruption, and Anti-Awdal Conduct This letter is not a communication; it is an institutional exposure, a legal indictment, and a political execution of accountability. Your conduct, statements, and behavior represent one of the most disgraceful collapses of ministerial integrity, legal understanding, and national loyalty in Somali history. Your accusation that the Awdal Defense Forces committed atrocities while defending their land, dignity, and existence is a calculated lie issued by state authority, a deliberate act of political deception, and an abuse of office that borders on criminality. You expose yourself not as a minister of defense, but as a hollow, incompetent, and compromised functionary incapable of distinguishing law from propaganda, aggressor from defender, or national duty from foreign allegiance. The Awdal Defense Forces are not criminals, not militias, not proxies, not separatists, not mercenaries, not political tools, and not affiliated with any faction, including the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa. They are a community self-defense force acting independently, without foreign sponsorship, without political alignment, without external command, and without institutional backing, defending their people, land, dignity, and existence against foreign-sponsored armed aggression. Your attempt to criminalize their lawful defense is not policy - it is fraud, not governance - it is persecution, not security - it is sabotage. Under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, the inherent right of self-defense against armed aggression is absolute. The aggressors are the Issa militias financed, armed, and politically sponsored by the President of Djibouti, Ismail Omar Guelleh, and coordinated with the Ugas of Issa in Ethiopia, who publicly mobilized in November 2025 after the Awdal community lawfully refused to host the illegal Heer Issa ceremony in Zeila. This constitutes cross-border proxy warfare, foreign-sponsored militia violence, and a direct attack on Somali sovereignty. Any competent minister would recognize this immediately. Your failure to do so is not ignorance; it is allegiance to foreign power. You are not functioning as a sovereign minister of the Federal Republic of Somalia. You are a subordinate political asset of the President of Djibouti and an instrument of a Somali presidency financially entangled with Djibouti. You are not defending sovereignty; you are liquidating it. You are not protecting citizens; you are sacrificing them. You are not exercising authority; you are renting it out. Your hostility toward the Awdal community is retaliatory, rooted in four years of parliamentary oversight investigations exposing corruption, abuse of office, and financial misconduct. This is not leadership; this is vendetta politics disguised as office. Your silence during the atrocities committed against Awdal civilians by the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa between December 4 and 7, 2025, proves your moral bankruptcy. No condemnation. No investigation. No accountability. No protection. Total abandonment. Now, when Awdal defends itself against foreign-sponsored Issa militias, you speak - not to defend civilians, not to defend law, not to defend sovereignty - but to defend aggressors, foreign sponsors, and political patrons. You then commit the grotesque act of labeling Awdal communities as part of the very secessionist regime that brutalized them, an act of narrative violence that is political sadism. The events of January 24–25, 2026, were deliberate provocations with clear intent to kill unarmed civilians in Ali Haydh, Osolo-Gab, Gargaara, and surrounding villages, where people were living their daily lives. These were not combat zones. They were civilian communities targeted for terror, displacement, and bloodshed. The Awdal Defense Forces acted because there was no alternative. Their response was defensive, lawful, and morally justified. They acted under Article 51 of the UN Charter and in full compliance with international humanitarian law, even allowing aggressors to retrieve their wounded and dead, demonstrating restraint and humanity - principles your ministry has never displayed. Yet you had the audacity to call these lawful defenders “bloody militias” of the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa. That is not mere incompetence; it is institutional defamation. It is an attack on identity, dignity, honor, and humanity. It is an attempt to erase lawful self-defense and replace it with propaganda. It is narrative warfare used to criminalize survival. In order to hide the expansionist regime in Djibouti’s aggression against ordinary civilians conducting their daily lives, your administration, alongside the President, Prime Minister, and Minister of Information, has engaged in a deliberate campaign to falsely associate the Awdal Defense Forces with the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa and to use the Israeli government’s suicidal fantasy recognition of this nonexistent regime as cover. Let it be abundantly clear: as a Member of the Foreign Affairs Committee and the legitimate representative of the people of Awdal, I publicly declare that the Awdal community has never supported nor will ever support any Israeli agenda to be implemented on Awdal land. We are not part of the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa, and we stand firmly with One Somalia United. The President, Prime Minister, Minister of Defense, and Minister of Information are buying influence over social media and international news organizations to propagate false characterizations of our Defense Forces, portraying them as aligned with Hargeisa or Israel. This is propaganda at the service of foreign agendas, and it is utterly false. On behalf of my people, I inform all Muslim and Arab countries that we are unequivocally opposed to Israeli government recognition of the non-existent one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa, and we will resist all efforts to undermine Somali sovereignty and the territorial integrity of Awdal. Your narrative that the separatist group in the Northwest has decided to massacre its own people is not analysis - it is deliberate disinformation designed to conceal foreign-sponsored proxy aggression. The massacres in Sool and parts of Awdal are consequences of external interference, proxy violence, and political betrayal that you enable. History will not remember you as a minister of defense. It will remember you as a symbol of incompetence, foreign subservience, political cowardice, and betrayal of Somali sovereignty. You chose servitude over duty, foreign allegiance over national loyalty, propaganda over law, and personal survival over morality. That choice defines your legacy and it will outlive your office. This letter stands as a permanent institutional record of your exposure, your condemnation, and your political disqualification, and as a formal affirmation that the Awdal Defense Forces acted lawfully, defensively, and honorably under international law in defense of civilian life, community survival, and human dignity. Federal Republic of Somalia Dr. Abdillahi Hashi Abib, MP Member, Foreign Affairs Committee House of the People Federal Republic of Somalia Hon. Ahmed FIQI GOLAHA SHACABKA JFS Rep. Andy Ogles Rep. Brian Mast House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority Rep. John Moolenaar Donald J. Trump Mohammad bin Salman (a.k.a. MbS) فيصل بن فرحان Foreign Ministry 🇸🇦 Secretary Marco Rubio Department of State Treasury Department U.S. Department of Justice Speaker Mike Johnson Susie Wiles Stephen Miller Hassan Sheikh Mohamud Villa Somalia Hamza Abdi Barre Sheikh Adan Mohamed Nur Madobe Somali Embassy-Qatar🇸🇴 وزارة الخارجية UAE in Somalia Chinese Embassy in Somalia Foreign Ministry 🇸🇦 U.S. Embassy Mogadishu, Somalia EU Delegation Somalia Italy in Somalia UNSOM Türkiye in Somalia UNDP Somalia UK in Somalia🇬🇧🇸🇴 World Bank Africa IMF Africa Canada in Kenya, Somalia and Uganda Embassy of Switzerland in Nairobi قناة الجزيرة Al Jazeera English العربية سكاي نيوز عربية ידיעות אחרונות Haaretz הארץ Haaretz הארץcom החדשות - N12 The Times of Israel The Jerusalem Post i24NEWS English Ynet Global
4:35

Minister Ahmed Moalim Fiqi Minister of Defense of the Federal Republic of Somalia Defamation of Awdal Defense Forces, and President Ismail Omar Geileh Allegiance Exposure - Minister Fiqi’s Cowardice, Corruption, and Anti-Awdal Conduct This letter is not a communication; it is an institutional exposure, a legal indictment, and a political execution of accountability. Your conduct, statements, and behavior represent one of the most disgraceful collapses of ministerial integrity, legal understanding, and national loyalty in Somali history. Your accusation that the Awdal Defense Forces committed atrocities while defending their land, dignity, and existence is a calculated lie issued by state authority, a deliberate act of political deception, and an abuse of office that borders on criminality. You expose yourself not as a minister of defense, but as a hollow, incompetent, and compromised functionary incapable of distinguishing law from propaganda, aggressor from defender, or national duty from foreign allegiance. The Awdal Defense Forces are not criminals, not militias, not proxies, not separatists, not mercenaries, not political tools, and not affiliated with any faction, including the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa. They are a community self-defense force acting independently, without foreign sponsorship, without political alignment, without external command, and without institutional backing, defending their people, land, dignity, and existence against foreign-sponsored armed aggression. Your attempt to criminalize their lawful defense is not policy - it is fraud, not governance - it is persecution, not security - it is sabotage. Under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, the inherent right of self-defense against armed aggression is absolute. The aggressors are the Issa militias financed, armed, and politically sponsored by the President of Djibouti, Ismail Omar Guelleh, and coordinated with the Ugas of Issa in Ethiopia, who publicly mobilized in November 2025 after the Awdal community lawfully refused to host the illegal Heer Issa ceremony in Zeila. This constitutes cross-border proxy warfare, foreign-sponsored militia violence, and a direct attack on Somali sovereignty. Any competent minister would recognize this immediately. Your failure to do so is not ignorance; it is allegiance to foreign power. You are not functioning as a sovereign minister of the Federal Republic of Somalia. You are a subordinate political asset of the President of Djibouti and an instrument of a Somali presidency financially entangled with Djibouti. You are not defending sovereignty; you are liquidating it. You are not protecting citizens; you are sacrificing them. You are not exercising authority; you are renting it out. Your hostility toward the Awdal community is retaliatory, rooted in four years of parliamentary oversight investigations exposing corruption, abuse of office, and financial misconduct. This is not leadership; this is vendetta politics disguised as office. Your silence during the atrocities committed against Awdal civilians by the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa between December 4 and 7, 2025, proves your moral bankruptcy. No condemnation. No investigation. No accountability. No protection. Total abandonment. Now, when Awdal defends itself against foreign-sponsored Issa militias, you speak - not to defend civilians, not to defend law, not to defend sovereignty - but to defend aggressors, foreign sponsors, and political patrons. You then commit the grotesque act of labeling Awdal communities as part of the very secessionist regime that brutalized them, an act of narrative violence that is political sadism. The events of January 24–25, 2026, were deliberate provocations with clear intent to kill unarmed civilians in Ali Haydh, Osolo-Gab, Gargaara, and surrounding villages, where people were living their daily lives. These were not combat zones. They were civilian communities targeted for terror, displacement, and bloodshed. The Awdal Defense Forces acted because there was no alternative. Their response was defensive, lawful, and morally justified. They acted under Article 51 of the UN Charter and in full compliance with international humanitarian law, even allowing aggressors to retrieve their wounded and dead, demonstrating restraint and humanity - principles your ministry has never displayed. Yet you had the audacity to call these lawful defenders “bloody militias” of the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa. That is not mere incompetence; it is institutional defamation. It is an attack on identity, dignity, honor, and humanity. It is an attempt to erase lawful self-defense and replace it with propaganda. It is narrative warfare used to criminalize survival. In order to hide the expansionist regime in Djibouti’s aggression against ordinary civilians conducting their daily lives, your administration, alongside the President, Prime Minister, and Minister of Information, has engaged in a deliberate campaign to falsely associate the Awdal Defense Forces with the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa and to use the Israeli government’s suicidal fantasy recognition of this nonexistent regime as cover. Let it be abundantly clear: as a Member of the Foreign Affairs Committee and the legitimate representative of the people of Awdal, I publicly declare that the Awdal community has never supported nor will ever support any Israeli agenda to be implemented on Awdal land. We are not part of the one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa, and we stand firmly with One Somalia United. The President, Prime Minister, Minister of Defense, and Minister of Information are buying influence over social media and international news organizations to propagate false characterizations of our Defense Forces, portraying them as aligned with Hargeisa or Israel. This is propaganda at the service of foreign agendas, and it is utterly false. On behalf of my people, I inform all Muslim and Arab countries that we are unequivocally opposed to Israeli government recognition of the non-existent one-tribe secessionist regime in Hargeisa, and we will resist all efforts to undermine Somali sovereignty and the territorial integrity of Awdal. Your narrative that the separatist group in the Northwest has decided to massacre its own people is not analysis - it is deliberate disinformation designed to conceal foreign-sponsored proxy aggression. The massacres in Sool and parts of Awdal are consequences of external interference, proxy violence, and political betrayal that you enable. History will not remember you as a minister of defense. It will remember you as a symbol of incompetence, foreign subservience, political cowardice, and betrayal of Somali sovereignty. You chose servitude over duty, foreign allegiance over national loyalty, propaganda over law, and personal survival over morality. That choice defines your legacy and it will outlive your office. This letter stands as a permanent institutional record of your exposure, your condemnation, and your political disqualification, and as a formal affirmation that the Awdal Defense Forces acted lawfully, defensively, and honorably under international law in defense of civilian life, community survival, and human dignity. Federal Republic of Somalia Dr. Abdillahi Hashi Abib, MP Member, Foreign Affairs Committee House of the People Federal Republic of Somalia Hon. Ahmed FIQI GOLAHA SHACABKA JFS Rep. Andy Ogles Rep. Brian Mast House Foreign Affairs Committee Majority Rep. John Moolenaar Donald J. Trump Mohammad bin Salman (a.k.a. MbS) فيصل بن فرحان Foreign Ministry 🇸🇦 Secretary Marco Rubio Department of State Treasury Department U.S. Department of Justice Speaker Mike Johnson Susie Wiles Stephen Miller Hassan Sheikh Mohamud Villa Somalia Hamza Abdi Barre Sheikh Adan Mohamed Nur Madobe Somali Embassy-Qatar🇸🇴 وزارة الخارجية UAE in Somalia Chinese Embassy in Somalia Foreign Ministry 🇸🇦 U.S. Embassy Mogadishu, Somalia EU Delegation Somalia Italy in Somalia UNSOM Türkiye in Somalia UNDP Somalia UK in Somalia🇬🇧🇸🇴 World Bank Africa IMF Africa Canada in Kenya, Somalia and Uganda Embassy of Switzerland in Nairobi قناة الجزيرة Al Jazeera English العربية سكاي نيوز عربية ידיעות אחרונות Haaretz הארץ Haaretz הארץcom החדשות - N12 The Times of Israel The Jerusalem Post i24NEWS English Ynet Global

MP Dr Abdillahi Hashi Abib

13,451 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

At a campaign rally in Hamilton, Ontario, Liberal leader Mark Carney unveiled what can only be described as a coordinated assault on digital freedom in Canada. Behind the slogans, applause lines, and empty rhetoric about unity, one portion of Carney’s remarks stood out for its implications: a bold, unapologetic commitment to controlling online speech under the guise of “safety” and “misinformation.” “We announced a series of measures with respect to online harm… a sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories—the sort of pollution that's online that washes over our virtual borders from the United States.” He then made clear his intention to act: “My government, if we are elected, will be taking action on those American giants who come across [our] border.” The former central banker, who now postures as a man of the people, made it clear that if the Liberals are re-elected, the federal government will intensify efforts to regulate what Canadians are allowed to see, say, and share online. His language was deliberate. Carney condemned what he called a “sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories” polluting Canada’s internet space—language borrowed directly from the Trudeau-era playbook. But this wasn’t just a moral denunciation. It was a legislative preview. Carney spoke of a future Liberal government taking “action on those American giants who come across our borders.” Translation: he wants to bring Big Tech platforms under federal control, or at least force them to play the role of speech enforcers for the Canadian state. He blamed the United States for exporting “hate” into Canada, reinforcing the bizarre Liberal narrative that the greatest threat to national unity isn’t foreign actors like the CCP or radical Islamists—it’s Facebook memes and American podcasts. But the most revealing moment came when Carney linked online speech directly to violence. He asserted that digital “pollution” affects how Canadians behave in real life, specifically pointing to conjugal violence, antisemitism, and drug abuse. This is how the ground is prepared for censorship: first by tying speech to harm, then by criminalizing what the state deems harmful. What Carney didn’t say is just as important. He made no distinction between actual criminal incitement and political dissent. He offered no assurance that free expression—a right enshrined in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms—would be respected. He provided no definition of what constitutes a “conspiracy theory” or who gets to make that determination. Under this framework, any criticism of government policy, of global institutions, or of the new technocratic order could be flagged, throttled, and punished. And that’s the point. Mark Carney isn’t interested in dialogue. He wants obedience. He doesn't trust Canadians to discern truth from fiction. He believes it’s the job of government—his government—to curate the national conversation, to protect citizens from wrongthink, to act as referee over what is and isn’t acceptable discourse. In short, he wants Ottawa to become the Ministry of Truth. Why They Don’t Actually Care About Antisemitism The Liberal establishment talks a big game about fighting hate—but when it comes to actual antisemitic violence, they’ve shown nothing but selective enforcement and political cowardice. Let’s look at the facts. In 2023, B’nai Brith Canada recorded nearly 6,000 antisemitic incidents, including 77 violent attacks—from firebombed synagogues to shots fired at Jewish schools in Montreal and Toronto. This wasn’t a marginal increase. It was a 208% spike in violent antisemitism in a single year. Statistics Canada echoed the same alarm bells. Jews—who make up just 1% of Canada’s population—were the victims of 70% of all religiously motivated hate crimes. That’s nearly 900 recorded incidents, up 71% from the previous year. Then came October 2023, when Hamas launched its attack on Israel—and the wave of hate turned into a tsunami: a 670% increase in antisemitic incidents across the country. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centers were hit with bomb threats, arson attempts, and intimidation campaigns. This was a national security issue, not just a policing matter. And yet, the government's response? Virtually nonexistent. Case in point: the Montreal Riot, November 2024. A 600-person mob, waving anti-NATO and pro-Palestinian banners, turned violent—setting fires, smashing windows, and attacking police. Amid this chaos, a man was filmed screaming “Final Solution”—a direct reference to the Nazi plan to exterminate the Jews. It went viral. There was no ambiguity, no misunderstanding. It was a public call for genocide. So what happened? Three arrests. None for hate crimes. None related to antisemitism. Montreal Police Chief Fady Dagher insisted there were “no confirmed antisemitic acts,” and as of early 2025, no hate crime charges have been filed against the individual caught on camera. That man, as it turns out, owned a Second Cup franchise. His punishment? His café was shut down by the company. Not by law enforcement. Not by hate crime investigators. A corporate HR department showed more backbone than Canada’s justice system. And this is what reveals the truth: they don’t care. They’ll enforce hate speech laws when it’s politically convenient—when it can be used to silence critics, crush dissent, or placate woke constituencies. But when Jewish communities are being threatened, attacked, and terrorized? The same laws suddenly go limp. The same political class that claims to protect minorities becomes paralyzed. They won’t touch it. Because confronting real antisemitism would require standing up to their political allies in activist circles, university campuses, and radical protest movements. This isn't an accident. It's a pattern. The Liberals aren’t weak on antisemitism because they’re unaware of it. They’re weak on it because they don’t see political value in enforcing the law when it conflicts with their ideological allies. Their obsession isn’t with hate speech—it’s with controlling “wrong” speech. And what qualifies as “wrong” isn’t defined by law or principle. It’s defined by what the Liberal establishment deems unacceptable. Their target isn’t violent bigotry. It’s dissent. They’ll chase down citizens for questioning carbon taxes or criticizing globalist policy—but when Jewish schools get shot at, or someone calls for genocide in the street, they shrug. This isn’t leadership. It’s selective justice. And it proves, beyond any doubt, that their agenda was never about protecting Canadians. It was always about protecting control. The Online Harms Act: Carney’s Blueprint for Speech Control This isn’t hypothetical. Mark Carney’s remarks in Hamilton mirror the exact logic and intent behind the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63)—legislation drafted under the Liberal banner and introduced in 2024 that pushes Canada into territory no free society should accept. At its core, Bill C-63 hands the federal government sweeping powers to police digital speech. It creates a Digital Safety Commission, an unelected bureaucratic authority empowered to monitor, investigate, and punish online platforms and individuals for content deemed "harmful." That word—harmful—is never concretely defined. It includes things like “hate speech,” “conspiracy theories,” and vague notions of “harm to children,” but it’s written broadly enough to be used as a political weapon. The most chilling provision? Preemptive imprisonment. Under this law, Canadians could be jailed for up to a year—without having committed a crime—if a judge believes they might post something harmful in the future. This isn’t law enforcement. This is thought policing. Carney didn’t just echo this approach—he amplified it. In his Hamilton rally, he described the internet as being flooded with “misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories,” and laid blame on foreign content “washing over our borders from the United States.” He didn’t argue for open debate or for empowering users to challenge dangerous ideas. He argued for the state to intervene and shut them down. He told Canadians that these ideas are “changing how people behave” and claimed his government will go after “those American giants” that allow this content to circulate. There’s no ambiguity here: this is a public declaration that a Liberal government under Mark Carney intends to censor, de-platform, and penalize dissenting views. Not illegal ones—just ones they don't like. And this isn’t new for him. Back in 2022, during the Freedom Convoy, Carney referred to protesters as committing “sedition” and demanded the government “thoroughly punish” them. These weren’t violent rioters or foreign agitators—these were working-class Canadians honking their horns and standing in the cold, protesting vaccine mandates. For Carney, their real crime was disobedience. Carney’s view of speech is simple: if it challenges the ruling order, it’s dangerous. And now, with Bill C-63 on the table and Carney at the helm, he’s building the legal infrastructure to lock down the digital public square—not to protect Canadians from violence, but to protect the Liberal establishment from criticism. That law is real. Carney’s agenda is real. And if he wins, enforcement is coming. Final thoughts This is the Canada Mark Carney envisions—one where citizens can’t speak freely online without first checking their views against government guidelines. A country where speech is no longer a right but a privilege granted by bureaucrats. A country where opposition isn’t argued with, it’s labeled harmful and erased. There was a time when Liberals championed civil liberties. That era is over. The new Liberalism is authoritarian—cloaked in the language of safety and inclusion, but animated by control. Carney’s rally in Hamilton wasn’t a policy rollout. It was a warning to anyone who still thinks they live in a country where dissent is allowed. They don’t want to fight hate. They want to define “wrong” speech—and then eliminate it. And by “wrong,” they mean anything the Liberal establishment disapproves of. Criticize the government, question the orthodoxy, challenge the state’s narrative, and you’ll be branded a threat. Not a citizen. Not a participant. A threat. So here we are. The speech laws are written. The censors are waiting. And Mark Carney is ready to pull the trigger. This election isn’t about tax credits or campaign slogans. It’s about whether Canada remains a free country or slides deeper into soft tyranny, one regulation, one commission, one silenced voice at a time. There is a choice. And the choice is this: bring it home—restore freedom, restore sanity, restore this country. Or: hand the keys to the same people who think you’re the problem for having the nerve to think for yourself.
6:31

At a campaign rally in Hamilton, Ontario, Liberal leader Mark Carney unveiled what can only be described as a coordinated assault on digital freedom in Canada. Behind the slogans, applause lines, and empty rhetoric about unity, one portion of Carney’s remarks stood out for its implications: a bold, unapologetic commitment to controlling online speech under the guise of “safety” and “misinformation.” “We announced a series of measures with respect to online harm… a sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories—the sort of pollution that's online that washes over our virtual borders from the United States.” He then made clear his intention to act: “My government, if we are elected, will be taking action on those American giants who come across [our] border.” The former central banker, who now postures as a man of the people, made it clear that if the Liberals are re-elected, the federal government will intensify efforts to regulate what Canadians are allowed to see, say, and share online. His language was deliberate. Carney condemned what he called a “sea of misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories” polluting Canada’s internet space—language borrowed directly from the Trudeau-era playbook. But this wasn’t just a moral denunciation. It was a legislative preview. Carney spoke of a future Liberal government taking “action on those American giants who come across our borders.” Translation: he wants to bring Big Tech platforms under federal control, or at least force them to play the role of speech enforcers for the Canadian state. He blamed the United States for exporting “hate” into Canada, reinforcing the bizarre Liberal narrative that the greatest threat to national unity isn’t foreign actors like the CCP or radical Islamists—it’s Facebook memes and American podcasts. But the most revealing moment came when Carney linked online speech directly to violence. He asserted that digital “pollution” affects how Canadians behave in real life, specifically pointing to conjugal violence, antisemitism, and drug abuse. This is how the ground is prepared for censorship: first by tying speech to harm, then by criminalizing what the state deems harmful. What Carney didn’t say is just as important. He made no distinction between actual criminal incitement and political dissent. He offered no assurance that free expression—a right enshrined in Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms—would be respected. He provided no definition of what constitutes a “conspiracy theory” or who gets to make that determination. Under this framework, any criticism of government policy, of global institutions, or of the new technocratic order could be flagged, throttled, and punished. And that’s the point. Mark Carney isn’t interested in dialogue. He wants obedience. He doesn't trust Canadians to discern truth from fiction. He believes it’s the job of government—his government—to curate the national conversation, to protect citizens from wrongthink, to act as referee over what is and isn’t acceptable discourse. In short, he wants Ottawa to become the Ministry of Truth. Why They Don’t Actually Care About Antisemitism The Liberal establishment talks a big game about fighting hate—but when it comes to actual antisemitic violence, they’ve shown nothing but selective enforcement and political cowardice. Let’s look at the facts. In 2023, B’nai Brith Canada recorded nearly 6,000 antisemitic incidents, including 77 violent attacks—from firebombed synagogues to shots fired at Jewish schools in Montreal and Toronto. This wasn’t a marginal increase. It was a 208% spike in violent antisemitism in a single year. Statistics Canada echoed the same alarm bells. Jews—who make up just 1% of Canada’s population—were the victims of 70% of all religiously motivated hate crimes. That’s nearly 900 recorded incidents, up 71% from the previous year. Then came October 2023, when Hamas launched its attack on Israel—and the wave of hate turned into a tsunami: a 670% increase in antisemitic incidents across the country. Jewish schools, synagogues, and community centers were hit with bomb threats, arson attempts, and intimidation campaigns. This was a national security issue, not just a policing matter. And yet, the government's response? Virtually nonexistent. Case in point: the Montreal Riot, November 2024. A 600-person mob, waving anti-NATO and pro-Palestinian banners, turned violent—setting fires, smashing windows, and attacking police. Amid this chaos, a man was filmed screaming “Final Solution”—a direct reference to the Nazi plan to exterminate the Jews. It went viral. There was no ambiguity, no misunderstanding. It was a public call for genocide. So what happened? Three arrests. None for hate crimes. None related to antisemitism. Montreal Police Chief Fady Dagher insisted there were “no confirmed antisemitic acts,” and as of early 2025, no hate crime charges have been filed against the individual caught on camera. That man, as it turns out, owned a Second Cup franchise. His punishment? His café was shut down by the company. Not by law enforcement. Not by hate crime investigators. A corporate HR department showed more backbone than Canada’s justice system. And this is what reveals the truth: they don’t care. They’ll enforce hate speech laws when it’s politically convenient—when it can be used to silence critics, crush dissent, or placate woke constituencies. But when Jewish communities are being threatened, attacked, and terrorized? The same laws suddenly go limp. The same political class that claims to protect minorities becomes paralyzed. They won’t touch it. Because confronting real antisemitism would require standing up to their political allies in activist circles, university campuses, and radical protest movements. This isn't an accident. It's a pattern. The Liberals aren’t weak on antisemitism because they’re unaware of it. They’re weak on it because they don’t see political value in enforcing the law when it conflicts with their ideological allies. Their obsession isn’t with hate speech—it’s with controlling “wrong” speech. And what qualifies as “wrong” isn’t defined by law or principle. It’s defined by what the Liberal establishment deems unacceptable. Their target isn’t violent bigotry. It’s dissent. They’ll chase down citizens for questioning carbon taxes or criticizing globalist policy—but when Jewish schools get shot at, or someone calls for genocide in the street, they shrug. This isn’t leadership. It’s selective justice. And it proves, beyond any doubt, that their agenda was never about protecting Canadians. It was always about protecting control. The Online Harms Act: Carney’s Blueprint for Speech Control This isn’t hypothetical. Mark Carney’s remarks in Hamilton mirror the exact logic and intent behind the Online Harms Act (Bill C-63)—legislation drafted under the Liberal banner and introduced in 2024 that pushes Canada into territory no free society should accept. At its core, Bill C-63 hands the federal government sweeping powers to police digital speech. It creates a Digital Safety Commission, an unelected bureaucratic authority empowered to monitor, investigate, and punish online platforms and individuals for content deemed "harmful." That word—harmful—is never concretely defined. It includes things like “hate speech,” “conspiracy theories,” and vague notions of “harm to children,” but it’s written broadly enough to be used as a political weapon. The most chilling provision? Preemptive imprisonment. Under this law, Canadians could be jailed for up to a year—without having committed a crime—if a judge believes they might post something harmful in the future. This isn’t law enforcement. This is thought policing. Carney didn’t just echo this approach—he amplified it. In his Hamilton rally, he described the internet as being flooded with “misogyny, anti-Semitism, hatred, conspiracy theories,” and laid blame on foreign content “washing over our borders from the United States.” He didn’t argue for open debate or for empowering users to challenge dangerous ideas. He argued for the state to intervene and shut them down. He told Canadians that these ideas are “changing how people behave” and claimed his government will go after “those American giants” that allow this content to circulate. There’s no ambiguity here: this is a public declaration that a Liberal government under Mark Carney intends to censor, de-platform, and penalize dissenting views. Not illegal ones—just ones they don't like. And this isn’t new for him. Back in 2022, during the Freedom Convoy, Carney referred to protesters as committing “sedition” and demanded the government “thoroughly punish” them. These weren’t violent rioters or foreign agitators—these were working-class Canadians honking their horns and standing in the cold, protesting vaccine mandates. For Carney, their real crime was disobedience. Carney’s view of speech is simple: if it challenges the ruling order, it’s dangerous. And now, with Bill C-63 on the table and Carney at the helm, he’s building the legal infrastructure to lock down the digital public square—not to protect Canadians from violence, but to protect the Liberal establishment from criticism. That law is real. Carney’s agenda is real. And if he wins, enforcement is coming. Final thoughts This is the Canada Mark Carney envisions—one where citizens can’t speak freely online without first checking their views against government guidelines. A country where speech is no longer a right but a privilege granted by bureaucrats. A country where opposition isn’t argued with, it’s labeled harmful and erased. There was a time when Liberals championed civil liberties. That era is over. The new Liberalism is authoritarian—cloaked in the language of safety and inclusion, but animated by control. Carney’s rally in Hamilton wasn’t a policy rollout. It was a warning to anyone who still thinks they live in a country where dissent is allowed. They don’t want to fight hate. They want to define “wrong” speech—and then eliminate it. And by “wrong,” they mean anything the Liberal establishment disapproves of. Criticize the government, question the orthodoxy, challenge the state’s narrative, and you’ll be branded a threat. Not a citizen. Not a participant. A threat. So here we are. The speech laws are written. The censors are waiting. And Mark Carney is ready to pull the trigger. This election isn’t about tax credits or campaign slogans. It’s about whether Canada remains a free country or slides deeper into soft tyranny, one regulation, one commission, one silenced voice at a time. There is a choice. And the choice is this: bring it home—restore freedom, restore sanity, restore this country. Or: hand the keys to the same people who think you’re the problem for having the nerve to think for yourself.

Dan Knight

62,283 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨NEW - House Speaker Mike Johnson delivers first floor speech on border catastrophe, accusing President Biden of intentionally creating a "clear and present danger to our national security." "Since I was elected Speaker less than 100 days ago, more than 700,000 illegals have been welcomed into our country illegally by the Biden administration. American schoolchildren have been forced into virtual schools so migrants can sleep in their school buildings. Korean War veterans have been booted from nursing homes that were sold to house migrants. Our streets are being flooded with fentanyl. Hundreds of thousands of children and adults are being poisoned and losing their lives. Vulnerable children and women are being exploited and trafficked by cartels. Since President Biden and Alejandro Mayorkas assumed office, there have been more than 7 million encounters with illegal aliens just at our southern border alone. 35 of our 50 states, including my home state of Louisiana, don't have a population that large. More than 300 individuals who are on our terror watchlist have been apprehended on the southern border. The frightening question is, how many have entered undetected? We know there are at least 1.8 million gotaways that have escaped. Understand that the situation at our border presents a clear and present danger to our national security, and it demands that it be addressed. FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Homeland Security Committee in November that these gotaways are a great concern for the agency, and all 56 of our Joint Terrorism Task Forces are trying to identify who these people are. We don't know how many terrorists are inside our borders. We do know that fentanyl is pouring into our communities like an open sewer. Right now, the leading cause of death of death in America for Americans aged 18 to 46 is fentanyl poisoning. To make matters worse, we've learned that the Biden administration is now simply just releasing 85% of the illegals who come across that border right into the country. For reference, by the way, in 2013, the Obama administration detained 82% of illegal aliens. How do we go from detaining 82% to releasing 85%? It only happens if this is by design. It only happens if it's an orchestrated intentional effort by the administration to do exactly that, and that is what the evidence shows. Earlier this month, I released a memo documenting 64 specific actions that the Biden administration has taken to undermine our border security and to promote the mass release of illegals and dangerous persons into our country. The very first day President Biden walked into the Oval Office, he revoked Executive Order 9844. Do you know what that did? It ended the construction of the border wall that Congress had already paid for. Everybody has seen the images of the materials out there rotting in the sun. Why? Because Joe Biden decided unilaterally that he didn't want a wall. In February 2021, the administration stopped applying Title 42 expulsions to children and incentivize by doing that incentivize families to send unaccompanied children through Mexico under the watch of cartels and traffickers. Since then, the administration admits to losing track of more than 80,000 unaccompanied children somewhere in the US. We don't know where they are. Have they been put into trafficking rings? We know that some of these kids are being trafficked for free labor and being forced to do things that are too appalling for us to articulate on this floor. Everybody here knows that's happening, and we're not demanding the President stop it? He can. He has the power to do it. In October 2021, the Biden administration revoked the migrant protection protocols that had been instituted under President Trump. That's the policy that we all know colloquially as Remain in Mexico. The Remain in Mexico policy kept asylum seekers in a safe haven third country while they were seeking asylum in the United States. Do you know why that works magically so well? Because it sent a message around the world that you shouldn't pay your life savings to a cartel to traffic you through Mexico and drop you over the US border because you're not going to be dropped over the US border. The word goes out on social media to countries all around the world. They are not going to let you in. Man, is that the most common sense rule you've ever thought of? President Biden doesn't agree because he stopped it. He issued an executive order to stop that common sense rule. A senior border patrol officer told us on that trip to Eagle Pass that if President Biden, by the stroke of a pen, would issue an executive order today to just simply reinstate Remain in Mexico, they think that would stop the flow by 70%. One stroke of the pen by the President. He does not seem to care. I told President Biden this myself on multiple occasions, most recently, a couple of weeks ago on the phone, I read him the law that says that he has all this authority, but he refuses to act. And even that's even despite court orders, by the way that instructed the administration to reinstate the institute remain in Mexico while the litigation was going on. You know what they did? They ignored it. The Biden administration is actively incentivizing illegals to come to the United States. We have laid out the welcome mat. We told everybody around the world, come on, you know what? The US taxpayer will take care of you. It's costing the American people billions and billions and billions of dollars to provide for people who are intentionally breaking our laws, billions and billions of dollars to house them and educate them and clothe them and take care of them. Why should we bear the burden when they break our laws? In January 2023, the Biden administration expanded the use of the Customs and Border Patrol One App so illegal aliens could just make appointments and then be released immediately right into America's interior. Guess what? 95% of all illegals who simply scheduled appointments through the app were released right into the United States. That's right. All you have to do is just download the app because they all have smartphones, make an appointment, and the President of the United States will release you into a network of NGOs who will put you on a plane to the destination of your choice. Without identification, by the way, while Americans are waiting in line to get through TSA. All on the dime of the American taxpayer. In December 2023, CBP recorded more than 302,000 encounters, almost double the population of my hometown of Shreveport, Louisiana. In just one month 302,000 people just walked right into the country. I could go on and on about the 64 actions we've documented that President Biden has specifically taken to open our border wide up, but it's crystal clear his policy choices and Secretary Mayorkas refusal to comply with the law are driving this border catastrophe. They have chosen disorder and chaos for us rather than securing the homeland. They've ceded the homeland to cartels and traffickers. In the Del Rio sector alone in Eagle Pass, Texas, the cartels are making an estimated $3.5 million dollars a day trafficking human beings into our country. Do the math. They are making billions of dollars a year trafficking undocumented children and victims into this country. The Department of Homeland Security has effectively become a taxi driver to just help traffickers complete the last few miles of their human smuggling operation, and they're making billions of dollars in the process. It's absolute madness, and it is dismantling the safety of our communities. More than half a million known criminals and illegal aliens are in the US in our communities, free to re-offend and victimize American people. When we were at Eagle Pass in the Del Rio sector earlier in January, they told us that 60 to 70% of the people coming across the border right there at that epicenter are single adult males. They're military-aged. These are not huddled masses of families seeking refuge and asylum. These are people coming into our country to do only God knows what. The Biden administration is allowing it, and we've noted that they are coming from adversarial nations and from terrorist regions. We have no idea what they're planning. But in fiscal year 2023, border patrol encountered illegals from 170 different countries, including hundreds from Iran and Syria, thousands from Russia, and tens of thousands have come in from China. Tell me that's not dangerous? Law enforcement and intelligence leaders are warning us that we may very well suffer a preventable terrorist attack here in the homeland if we don't immediately secure that border and remove these dangerous terrorists from inside our borders. I read the black letter law to the President of the United States on the phone about two and a half weeks ago. I said, Mr. President, it says very clearly that you have all the tools and the executive authority necessary to reverse the catastrophe that you have created. He has those tools right now, and he has since day one. We have to decide if we believe in the rule of law or not. We have to decide if we're a sovereign nation or we're not. I believe that border security is part of our solemn obligation to safeguard the well-being of our citizens and uphold the principles that define who we are as a nation. A weak border weakens America, and a strong border is good for America, and a stronger America is good for everybody around the world. And everybody in this chamber should acknowledge that. Just as we lock our doors at night to protect our homes, we secure our borders to protect our homeland. And my friends, that is our sacred obligation." Speaker Mike Johnson
29:19

🚨NEW - House Speaker Mike Johnson delivers first floor speech on border catastrophe, accusing President Biden of intentionally creating a "clear and present danger to our national security." "Since I was elected Speaker less than 100 days ago, more than 700,000 illegals have been welcomed into our country illegally by the Biden administration. American schoolchildren have been forced into virtual schools so migrants can sleep in their school buildings. Korean War veterans have been booted from nursing homes that were sold to house migrants. Our streets are being flooded with fentanyl. Hundreds of thousands of children and adults are being poisoned and losing their lives. Vulnerable children and women are being exploited and trafficked by cartels. Since President Biden and Alejandro Mayorkas assumed office, there have been more than 7 million encounters with illegal aliens just at our southern border alone. 35 of our 50 states, including my home state of Louisiana, don't have a population that large. More than 300 individuals who are on our terror watchlist have been apprehended on the southern border. The frightening question is, how many have entered undetected? We know there are at least 1.8 million gotaways that have escaped. Understand that the situation at our border presents a clear and present danger to our national security, and it demands that it be addressed. FBI Director Christopher Wray told the Homeland Security Committee in November that these gotaways are a great concern for the agency, and all 56 of our Joint Terrorism Task Forces are trying to identify who these people are. We don't know how many terrorists are inside our borders. We do know that fentanyl is pouring into our communities like an open sewer. Right now, the leading cause of death of death in America for Americans aged 18 to 46 is fentanyl poisoning. To make matters worse, we've learned that the Biden administration is now simply just releasing 85% of the illegals who come across that border right into the country. For reference, by the way, in 2013, the Obama administration detained 82% of illegal aliens. How do we go from detaining 82% to releasing 85%? It only happens if this is by design. It only happens if it's an orchestrated intentional effort by the administration to do exactly that, and that is what the evidence shows. Earlier this month, I released a memo documenting 64 specific actions that the Biden administration has taken to undermine our border security and to promote the mass release of illegals and dangerous persons into our country. The very first day President Biden walked into the Oval Office, he revoked Executive Order 9844. Do you know what that did? It ended the construction of the border wall that Congress had already paid for. Everybody has seen the images of the materials out there rotting in the sun. Why? Because Joe Biden decided unilaterally that he didn't want a wall. In February 2021, the administration stopped applying Title 42 expulsions to children and incentivize by doing that incentivize families to send unaccompanied children through Mexico under the watch of cartels and traffickers. Since then, the administration admits to losing track of more than 80,000 unaccompanied children somewhere in the US. We don't know where they are. Have they been put into trafficking rings? We know that some of these kids are being trafficked for free labor and being forced to do things that are too appalling for us to articulate on this floor. Everybody here knows that's happening, and we're not demanding the President stop it? He can. He has the power to do it. In October 2021, the Biden administration revoked the migrant protection protocols that had been instituted under President Trump. That's the policy that we all know colloquially as Remain in Mexico. The Remain in Mexico policy kept asylum seekers in a safe haven third country while they were seeking asylum in the United States. Do you know why that works magically so well? Because it sent a message around the world that you shouldn't pay your life savings to a cartel to traffic you through Mexico and drop you over the US border because you're not going to be dropped over the US border. The word goes out on social media to countries all around the world. They are not going to let you in. Man, is that the most common sense rule you've ever thought of? President Biden doesn't agree because he stopped it. He issued an executive order to stop that common sense rule. A senior border patrol officer told us on that trip to Eagle Pass that if President Biden, by the stroke of a pen, would issue an executive order today to just simply reinstate Remain in Mexico, they think that would stop the flow by 70%. One stroke of the pen by the President. He does not seem to care. I told President Biden this myself on multiple occasions, most recently, a couple of weeks ago on the phone, I read him the law that says that he has all this authority, but he refuses to act. And even that's even despite court orders, by the way that instructed the administration to reinstate the institute remain in Mexico while the litigation was going on. You know what they did? They ignored it. The Biden administration is actively incentivizing illegals to come to the United States. We have laid out the welcome mat. We told everybody around the world, come on, you know what? The US taxpayer will take care of you. It's costing the American people billions and billions and billions of dollars to provide for people who are intentionally breaking our laws, billions and billions of dollars to house them and educate them and clothe them and take care of them. Why should we bear the burden when they break our laws? In January 2023, the Biden administration expanded the use of the Customs and Border Patrol One App so illegal aliens could just make appointments and then be released immediately right into America's interior. Guess what? 95% of all illegals who simply scheduled appointments through the app were released right into the United States. That's right. All you have to do is just download the app because they all have smartphones, make an appointment, and the President of the United States will release you into a network of NGOs who will put you on a plane to the destination of your choice. Without identification, by the way, while Americans are waiting in line to get through TSA. All on the dime of the American taxpayer. In December 2023, CBP recorded more than 302,000 encounters, almost double the population of my hometown of Shreveport, Louisiana. In just one month 302,000 people just walked right into the country. I could go on and on about the 64 actions we've documented that President Biden has specifically taken to open our border wide up, but it's crystal clear his policy choices and Secretary Mayorkas refusal to comply with the law are driving this border catastrophe. They have chosen disorder and chaos for us rather than securing the homeland. They've ceded the homeland to cartels and traffickers. In the Del Rio sector alone in Eagle Pass, Texas, the cartels are making an estimated $3.5 million dollars a day trafficking human beings into our country. Do the math. They are making billions of dollars a year trafficking undocumented children and victims into this country. The Department of Homeland Security has effectively become a taxi driver to just help traffickers complete the last few miles of their human smuggling operation, and they're making billions of dollars in the process. It's absolute madness, and it is dismantling the safety of our communities. More than half a million known criminals and illegal aliens are in the US in our communities, free to re-offend and victimize American people. When we were at Eagle Pass in the Del Rio sector earlier in January, they told us that 60 to 70% of the people coming across the border right there at that epicenter are single adult males. They're military-aged. These are not huddled masses of families seeking refuge and asylum. These are people coming into our country to do only God knows what. The Biden administration is allowing it, and we've noted that they are coming from adversarial nations and from terrorist regions. We have no idea what they're planning. But in fiscal year 2023, border patrol encountered illegals from 170 different countries, including hundreds from Iran and Syria, thousands from Russia, and tens of thousands have come in from China. Tell me that's not dangerous? Law enforcement and intelligence leaders are warning us that we may very well suffer a preventable terrorist attack here in the homeland if we don't immediately secure that border and remove these dangerous terrorists from inside our borders. I read the black letter law to the President of the United States on the phone about two and a half weeks ago. I said, Mr. President, it says very clearly that you have all the tools and the executive authority necessary to reverse the catastrophe that you have created. He has those tools right now, and he has since day one. We have to decide if we believe in the rule of law or not. We have to decide if we're a sovereign nation or we're not. I believe that border security is part of our solemn obligation to safeguard the well-being of our citizens and uphold the principles that define who we are as a nation. A weak border weakens America, and a strong border is good for America, and a stronger America is good for everybody around the world. And everybody in this chamber should acknowledge that. Just as we lock our doors at night to protect our homes, we secure our borders to protect our homeland. And my friends, that is our sacred obligation." Speaker Mike Johnson

KanekoaTheGreat

14,479,223 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Everybody needs a digital ID, say heads of state and high-tech leaders. They give many reasons: it will stop illegal migration; it will increase efficiency; it will protect privacy; and it will prevent online fraud and data ransoming. But we don’t need digital IDs for any of those things. The US just stopped illegal migration without digital IDs. Our online activities are more efficient than ever and it’s hard to see how they could get more efficient without sacrificing privacy and safety. And centralizing data through digital IDs, which could link social media, vaccine, and banking information, in ways that allow government control, would undermine cybersecurity because having separate log-ins for our financial, health, shopping, banking, credit card, and other data makes sure that if one is hacked they aren’t all hacked. “All your information in one place is a hacker’s dream,” said an Oxford University IT expert. “We already have countless ways we can provide our identity – passports, driving licences, and so on.” Many Americans likely think that digital IDs are only something people in Britain have to worry about. Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week declared that every working person there must have digital ID, or “BritCard”. The U.S. should never allow such a thing. A digital ID that linked our social media, vaccine records, and bank accounts could allow governments to censor and control the population, violating our free speech and privacy rights. Those Americans should think again. We are rapidly moving to the exact same digital ID surveillance and control system as the British. Real IDs contain embedded microchips that bring us one step closer to digital IDs. State governors are pushing it. Gavin Newsom last year allowed drivers licenses onto Apple and Google wallets. This “mobile drivers license,” or mDL, is a digital ID, and one more link in the chain. And it is Americans, including Bill Gates and the controlling owner of Oracle, Larry Ellison, who are financing the digital ID push. “ The NHS [National Health Service] in the UK has an incredible amount of population data, but it’s fragmented,” he told Blair in February of this year. “It’s not easily accessible by these AI models. We have to take all of this data we have in our country and move it into a single, if you will, unified data platform… The secret is to get all of that data in one place.” In September, Ellison made clear that he viewed the power of data centralization in behavior change. “Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly watching and recording everything that’s going on.” Ellison’s Oracle is an AI database cloud computing company and he is its best salesman. Ellison, the second richest man in the world, and owner of CBS and CNN, has “donated or pledged at least £257m to the Tony Blair Institute,” reportedthe New Statesman last week. “Ellison donations have helped it grow to more than 900 staff, working in at least 45 countries.” The nightmare scenario for mass, constant spying on citizens is not theoretical. China in 2019 created a social credit system with rewards that include better employment, school admissions, and shorter wait times in hospitals, and punishments including denial of access to public services and social events, denial of train and air tickets, and public shaming. One study found that at least one-third of total “offenses” were not actually against the law and thus expanded “local government authority into moral and social domains beyond the law,” found researchers. UK’s Big Brother Watched recently warned that a digital ID system, even if initially limited, could be a gateway to more invasive government surveillance and intrusion. Why would any liberal and democratic Western government like Britain want such a thing? Money is no doubt a big part of it. Oracle and other high tech companies stand to make billions taking bits of our money here and there for every transaction. Governments like Keir Starmer’s also seem eager to give them billions in contracts to monitor and analyze the population. We found no evidence Starmer would personally benefit financially from digital IDs, however, and as a political leader, he must consider whether his actions are popular, and digital IDs are not. A YouGov poll released yesterday found UK opinion toward digital IDs was 42 percent in favor and 45 percent against. And given the negative reaction to them online, popular opposition will likely rise. Tony Blair Institute’s (TBI) polling may have misled Starmer. TBI’s first question primed people to think about how inconvenienced they’ve felt without a digital ID, a blatantly manipulative form of polling. No honest pollster seeking to give a client a realistic understanding of how the public thought about digital IDs would have started with that question, because they know the importance of framing. The second question was equally biased. “Some are suggesting the government should introduce a new app, allowing instant access to a range of public services.” The framing suggests awareness on the part of the pollster that the public had a negative view of “digital ID,” hence the use of the “app” euphemism. The third question was “Do you think there is digital technology that could help tackle these issues... Processing asylum seekers and managing the UK’s borders.” One reason to think Starmer relied on the TBI’s biased polling is that Starmer pitched the digital ID as necessary to stop mass migration. “I know working people are worried about the level of illegal migration into this country,” said Starmer. “Digital ID… will make it tougher to work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure.” The notion is absurd. Nations have maintained borders for hundreds of years without the need for digital IDs. Given how badly the Starmer government’s digital ID roll out appears to have backfired, why did Starmer and Blair push it? One possibility is that they really believe in the mission of improving people’s lives. That is already how they justify it. Said Starmer, “it will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to prove your identity to access key services swiftly - rather than hunting around for an old utility bill.” But it is hard to believe Starmer and Blair really viewed the difficulty of finding where you left your utility bill as a high-priority social problem. It appears more likely that they are hiding their reasons and that the real motivation is the same as the Chinese government: to control the population. Gates last year released a Netflix documentary calling for sweeping AI-powered censorship of people he disagrees with on vaccines and other issues. The Starmer government’s digital IDs should be a wake-up call to all of us. For years, various people have been raising concerns about digital IDs but free speech and privacy advocates have clearly not done enough to stop them. That needs to change. The good news is that the backlash to the digital IDs appears strong and growing. And anyone can see that, when they spoke, Blair was taking instructions from Ellison. “You can pipe this data from these three thousand separate data sources into a single unified database,” said Ellison, “and that’s what we need to do.” The episode should wake us Americans up to the continuing threat of total surveillance and censorship. Powerful American high-tech elites see dollar signs in controlling our data — and our behavior. As such, this episode has motivated my colleagues and me to do more on this issue, including making grants to people doing investigative reporting, research, documentary filmmaking, policy development and policy advocacy on digital IDs. Please email info@civilizationworks.org to get involved, and consider making a tax-deductible donation. And if you’re not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support our award-winning investigative journalism, which is essential to revealing the truth about censorship and digital IDs.
8:42

Everybody needs a digital ID, say heads of state and high-tech leaders. They give many reasons: it will stop illegal migration; it will increase efficiency; it will protect privacy; and it will prevent online fraud and data ransoming. But we don’t need digital IDs for any of those things. The US just stopped illegal migration without digital IDs. Our online activities are more efficient than ever and it’s hard to see how they could get more efficient without sacrificing privacy and safety. And centralizing data through digital IDs, which could link social media, vaccine, and banking information, in ways that allow government control, would undermine cybersecurity because having separate log-ins for our financial, health, shopping, banking, credit card, and other data makes sure that if one is hacked they aren’t all hacked. “All your information in one place is a hacker’s dream,” said an Oxford University IT expert. “We already have countless ways we can provide our identity – passports, driving licences, and so on.” Many Americans likely think that digital IDs are only something people in Britain have to worry about. Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week declared that every working person there must have digital ID, or “BritCard”. The U.S. should never allow such a thing. A digital ID that linked our social media, vaccine records, and bank accounts could allow governments to censor and control the population, violating our free speech and privacy rights. Those Americans should think again. We are rapidly moving to the exact same digital ID surveillance and control system as the British. Real IDs contain embedded microchips that bring us one step closer to digital IDs. State governors are pushing it. Gavin Newsom last year allowed drivers licenses onto Apple and Google wallets. This “mobile drivers license,” or mDL, is a digital ID, and one more link in the chain. And it is Americans, including Bill Gates and the controlling owner of Oracle, Larry Ellison, who are financing the digital ID push. “ The NHS [National Health Service] in the UK has an incredible amount of population data, but it’s fragmented,” he told Blair in February of this year. “It’s not easily accessible by these AI models. We have to take all of this data we have in our country and move it into a single, if you will, unified data platform… The secret is to get all of that data in one place.” In September, Ellison made clear that he viewed the power of data centralization in behavior change. “Citizens will be on their best behavior because we’re constantly watching and recording everything that’s going on.” Ellison’s Oracle is an AI database cloud computing company and he is its best salesman. Ellison, the second richest man in the world, and owner of CBS and CNN, has “donated or pledged at least £257m to the Tony Blair Institute,” reportedthe New Statesman last week. “Ellison donations have helped it grow to more than 900 staff, working in at least 45 countries.” The nightmare scenario for mass, constant spying on citizens is not theoretical. China in 2019 created a social credit system with rewards that include better employment, school admissions, and shorter wait times in hospitals, and punishments including denial of access to public services and social events, denial of train and air tickets, and public shaming. One study found that at least one-third of total “offenses” were not actually against the law and thus expanded “local government authority into moral and social domains beyond the law,” found researchers. UK’s Big Brother Watched recently warned that a digital ID system, even if initially limited, could be a gateway to more invasive government surveillance and intrusion. Why would any liberal and democratic Western government like Britain want such a thing? Money is no doubt a big part of it. Oracle and other high tech companies stand to make billions taking bits of our money here and there for every transaction. Governments like Keir Starmer’s also seem eager to give them billions in contracts to monitor and analyze the population. We found no evidence Starmer would personally benefit financially from digital IDs, however, and as a political leader, he must consider whether his actions are popular, and digital IDs are not. A YouGov poll released yesterday found UK opinion toward digital IDs was 42 percent in favor and 45 percent against. And given the negative reaction to them online, popular opposition will likely rise. Tony Blair Institute’s (TBI) polling may have misled Starmer. TBI’s first question primed people to think about how inconvenienced they’ve felt without a digital ID, a blatantly manipulative form of polling. No honest pollster seeking to give a client a realistic understanding of how the public thought about digital IDs would have started with that question, because they know the importance of framing. The second question was equally biased. “Some are suggesting the government should introduce a new app, allowing instant access to a range of public services.” The framing suggests awareness on the part of the pollster that the public had a negative view of “digital ID,” hence the use of the “app” euphemism. The third question was “Do you think there is digital technology that could help tackle these issues... Processing asylum seekers and managing the UK’s borders.” One reason to think Starmer relied on the TBI’s biased polling is that Starmer pitched the digital ID as necessary to stop mass migration. “I know working people are worried about the level of illegal migration into this country,” said Starmer. “Digital ID… will make it tougher to work illegally in this country, making our borders more secure.” The notion is absurd. Nations have maintained borders for hundreds of years without the need for digital IDs. Given how badly the Starmer government’s digital ID roll out appears to have backfired, why did Starmer and Blair push it? One possibility is that they really believe in the mission of improving people’s lives. That is already how they justify it. Said Starmer, “it will also offer ordinary citizens countless benefits, like being able to prove your identity to access key services swiftly - rather than hunting around for an old utility bill.” But it is hard to believe Starmer and Blair really viewed the difficulty of finding where you left your utility bill as a high-priority social problem. It appears more likely that they are hiding their reasons and that the real motivation is the same as the Chinese government: to control the population. Gates last year released a Netflix documentary calling for sweeping AI-powered censorship of people he disagrees with on vaccines and other issues. The Starmer government’s digital IDs should be a wake-up call to all of us. For years, various people have been raising concerns about digital IDs but free speech and privacy advocates have clearly not done enough to stop them. That needs to change. The good news is that the backlash to the digital IDs appears strong and growing. And anyone can see that, when they spoke, Blair was taking instructions from Ellison. “You can pipe this data from these three thousand separate data sources into a single unified database,” said Ellison, “and that’s what we need to do.” The episode should wake us Americans up to the continuing threat of total surveillance and censorship. Powerful American high-tech elites see dollar signs in controlling our data — and our behavior. As such, this episode has motivated my colleagues and me to do more on this issue, including making grants to people doing investigative reporting, research, documentary filmmaking, policy development and policy advocacy on digital IDs. Please email [email protected] to get involved, and consider making a tax-deductible donation. And if you’re not already a subscriber, please subscribe now to support our award-winning investigative journalism, which is essential to revealing the truth about censorship and digital IDs.

Michael Shellenberger

1,354,765 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten