正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Alex Karp just explained why the smartest people on Earth are engineering their own destruction. Silicon Valley is erasing every white-collar job in America while telling the US military they want nothing to do with it. You are dismantling the livelihoods of the people who write the laws and...

r0ck3t23's profile picture

Dustin

36,595 subscribers

24,244 次观看 • 8 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir at a16z summit: “If Silicon Valley believes we’re going to take everyone’s white collar jobs…AND screw the military…If you don’t think that’s going to lead to the nationalization of our technology—you’re retarded”
1:35

Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir at a16z summit: “If Silicon Valley believes we’re going to take everyone’s white collar jobs…AND screw the military…If you don’t think that’s going to lead to the nationalization of our technology—you’re retarded”

Maya Sulkin

1,544,301 次观看 • 4 个月前

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Silicon Valley is still underestimating AI and it’s disproportionately hurting democrats: “If you’re going to disrupt the economic and political power of the democrat base— and you believe that’s going to work out politically— you're in an insane asylum.” “This technology disrupts humanities-trained, largely democratic voters, and makes their economic power, less. And increases the power of vocationally trained, working class (often male) voters.” “These disruptions are going to disrupt every aspect of our society.” “To make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology, and how we’re going to explain to people who are likely going to have less good, and less interesting jobs from their perspective…” “These technologies are dangerous societally. The only justification you could possibly have is— if we don’t do it, our adversaries will, and we’ll be subject to their rule of law.” “If you decouple this from the support of the military, you’re going to have an enormous problem explaining to be American people— why is it we’re observing the risk of disrupting the very fabric of our society, if it’s not because it’s about maintaining our ability to be American?” “If you don’t believe it— look at the battlefield. What do you think the Chinese and Russians are saying about what they’re seeing on the battlefield right now? They’re not saying this is some incremental technology.” “They’re saying, ‘Wait— the last time we saw America fight it was Afghanistan and nothing worked.’”
3:08

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Silicon Valley is still underestimating AI and it’s disproportionately hurting democrats: “If you’re going to disrupt the economic and political power of the democrat base— and you believe that’s going to work out politically— you're in an insane asylum.” “This technology disrupts humanities-trained, largely democratic voters, and makes their economic power, less. And increases the power of vocationally trained, working class (often male) voters.” “These disruptions are going to disrupt every aspect of our society.” “To make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology, and how we’re going to explain to people who are likely going to have less good, and less interesting jobs from their perspective…” “These technologies are dangerous societally. The only justification you could possibly have is— if we don’t do it, our adversaries will, and we’ll be subject to their rule of law.” “If you decouple this from the support of the military, you’re going to have an enormous problem explaining to be American people— why is it we’re observing the risk of disrupting the very fabric of our society, if it’s not because it’s about maintaining our ability to be American?” “If you don’t believe it— look at the battlefield. What do you think the Chinese and Russians are saying about what they’re seeing on the battlefield right now? They’re not saying this is some incremental technology.” “They’re saying, ‘Wait— the last time we saw America fight it was Afghanistan and nothing worked.’”

Jawwwn

66,645 次观看 • 4 个月前

Your morning white pill from Jeremy Boreing is that to succeed, you must resist a victim mentality: “One of the great truths in life is that you cannot behave as a victim even if you are one- perhaps especially if you are one bc then it is actually reinforced by reality… One of the hardest things to do is to see yourself as a person with agency. It is the difference between the people who succeed in life and the people who don’t. It’s the difference between the people who are happy and the people who are not.”
0:37

Your morning white pill from Jeremy Boreing is that to succeed, you must resist a victim mentality: “One of the great truths in life is that you cannot behave as a victim even if you are one- perhaps especially if you are one bc then it is actually reinforced by reality… One of the hardest things to do is to see yourself as a person with agency. It is the difference between the people who succeed in life and the people who don’t. It’s the difference between the people who are happy and the people who are not.”

Jackie Chea ⚖️

30,479 次观看 • 3 个月前

Alex Karp just said out loud what Washington refuses to. The AI race is not a competition. It is a war. And there are exactly two sides. Karp: “We are going to be the dominant player, or China’s going to be the dominant player, and there will just be very different rules depending on who wins.” No third option in that sentence. No coalition. No shared framework. No handshake at Davos that splits the future down the middle. One side writes the rules. The other lives under them. The entire debate around AI safety assumes America is making decisions in a vacuum. It is not. Karp: “No decision is without risk. And the risk we have to absorb here is going long on this because it’s not… like we’re not doing this in a vacuum.” Every month spent perfecting guardrails is a month your adversary spends building weapons. Every regulation designed to slow deployment does not slow deployment globally. It slows deployment here. The difference is fatal. And when someone pressed Karp on the danger of going too fast, he did not answer the question. He replaced it. Karp: “You will have far fewer rights if America’s not in the lead.” That is the sentence the privacy crowd pretends they never heard. They are terrified of what American AI might do to civil liberties. They have never once stopped to consider what Chinese AI will do to civil liberties. Because that conversation ends their entire argument before it starts. You do not protect rights with inferior technology. You do not preserve freedom by throttling your own intelligence while your adversary sprints. The nightmare is not that America builds AI too fast. The nightmare is that America builds it too slow and wakes up inside infrastructure it does not own, running on rules it did not write. Karp: “We cannot rely on anyone else to do this in our network of allies because Europe has given up on technology.” No diplomatic softening. No footnote. Just the verdict. Europe is out. The alliance structure that defined eighty years of Western dominance has one functioning technology engine left. If that engine stalls, the West does not get a second one. The doomers want to stop. The optimists refuse to worry. Karp is telling you both camps are hallucinating. The risk is real. The danger is real. And you absorb it anyway. Because the only thing more dangerous than an AI that breaks for you is an AI that works perfectly for the country that wants to bury you. That is not a policy debate. That is a survival calculation. And there is exactly one correct answer.
1:07

Alex Karp just said out loud what Washington refuses to. The AI race is not a competition. It is a war. And there are exactly two sides. Karp: “We are going to be the dominant player, or China’s going to be the dominant player, and there will just be very different rules depending on who wins.” No third option in that sentence. No coalition. No shared framework. No handshake at Davos that splits the future down the middle. One side writes the rules. The other lives under them. The entire debate around AI safety assumes America is making decisions in a vacuum. It is not. Karp: “No decision is without risk. And the risk we have to absorb here is going long on this because it’s not… like we’re not doing this in a vacuum.” Every month spent perfecting guardrails is a month your adversary spends building weapons. Every regulation designed to slow deployment does not slow deployment globally. It slows deployment here. The difference is fatal. And when someone pressed Karp on the danger of going too fast, he did not answer the question. He replaced it. Karp: “You will have far fewer rights if America’s not in the lead.” That is the sentence the privacy crowd pretends they never heard. They are terrified of what American AI might do to civil liberties. They have never once stopped to consider what Chinese AI will do to civil liberties. Because that conversation ends their entire argument before it starts. You do not protect rights with inferior technology. You do not preserve freedom by throttling your own intelligence while your adversary sprints. The nightmare is not that America builds AI too fast. The nightmare is that America builds it too slow and wakes up inside infrastructure it does not own, running on rules it did not write. Karp: “We cannot rely on anyone else to do this in our network of allies because Europe has given up on technology.” No diplomatic softening. No footnote. Just the verdict. Europe is out. The alliance structure that defined eighty years of Western dominance has one functioning technology engine left. If that engine stalls, the West does not get a second one. The doomers want to stop. The optimists refuse to worry. Karp is telling you both camps are hallucinating. The risk is real. The danger is real. And you absorb it anyway. Because the only thing more dangerous than an AI that breaks for you is an AI that works perfectly for the country that wants to bury you. That is not a policy debate. That is a survival calculation. And there is exactly one correct answer.

Dustin

26,046 次观看 • 3 个月前

Vance: I understand why people are worried that, you know, if you have a robot doing that job, does it take away from a blue-collar worker who could do that job? The evidence I see is that if we really lean in to robotics and technology, it’s is going to raise everybody's wages and make everybody better off. If you go back to when the automated teller machine was invented, everybody said it would destroy the jobs of all the bank tellers. What actually happened is that today you have more people working in bank telling then you did 50 years ago. I don't think we will ever eliminate the construction industry in this country just because you have robots. What you will have his a lot of construction workers who are using those robots, directing those robots
2:18

Vance: I understand why people are worried that, you know, if you have a robot doing that job, does it take away from a blue-collar worker who could do that job? The evidence I see is that if we really lean in to robotics and technology, it’s is going to raise everybody's wages and make everybody better off. If you go back to when the automated teller machine was invented, everybody said it would destroy the jobs of all the bank tellers. What actually happened is that today you have more people working in bank telling then you did 50 years ago. I don't think we will ever eliminate the construction industry in this country just because you have robots. What you will have his a lot of construction workers who are using those robots, directing those robots

Acyn

156,104 次观看 • 8 个月前

WILD TAKE: Bill Maher on the Supreme Court Striking Down Parts of the Voting Rights Act: “We’ve heard a lot of talk about a civil war. This is like a step toward that. I saw the map. The picture of the map of what it’s going to look like. There’s going to be no black congress people from the South.” “You think you can cut off the part of the country that has the most African Americans in it, and that map is completely red… and you think people are just going to take that lying down.” Bret Stephens: “What I think you’re actually going to have is you’re going to have black representation, but a lot more of it is going to be Republican.”
0:47

WILD TAKE: Bill Maher on the Supreme Court Striking Down Parts of the Voting Rights Act: “We’ve heard a lot of talk about a civil war. This is like a step toward that. I saw the map. The picture of the map of what it’s going to look like. There’s going to be no black congress people from the South.” “You think you can cut off the part of the country that has the most African Americans in it, and that map is completely red… and you think people are just going to take that lying down.” Bret Stephens: “What I think you’re actually going to have is you’re going to have black representation, but a lot more of it is going to be Republican.”

RedWave Press

864,120 次观看 • 2 个月前

Here's what Irish people need to understand - You might not see race, but race sees you. You might think of yourself as just Irish, but the world sees you as a White person. In fact we are some of the Whitest of all the White people on earth. This might be uncomfortable to hear, but it is reality and you're hindering yourself and your kids by denying it. You see it on the streets, you see it in the shops and the schools, Irish people are on the way to becoming a minority in our own country. Africans come to Ireland, stand in our streets, pick up a microphone and blame us for the slave trade. What happens if we become a minority and they control the government, the gardaí and everything else? Reality doesn't matter to them, our history doesn't matter. You might not see race, but race sees you.
0:32

Here's what Irish people need to understand - You might not see race, but race sees you. You might think of yourself as just Irish, but the world sees you as a White person. In fact we are some of the Whitest of all the White people on earth. This might be uncomfortable to hear, but it is reality and you're hindering yourself and your kids by denying it. You see it on the streets, you see it in the shops and the schools, Irish people are on the way to becoming a minority in our own country. Africans come to Ireland, stand in our streets, pick up a microphone and blame us for the slave trade. What happens if we become a minority and they control the government, the gardaí and everything else? Reality doesn't matter to them, our history doesn't matter. You might not see race, but race sees you.

MichaeloKeeffe

58,485 次观看 • 5 个月前

Joe: “Stephen, I’d like to congratulate you for being the latest black person to be called low IQ by President Trump. It’s quite a long and distinguished list of people.” Stephen A. Smith: “Hold on, just because he did that I’m not going to let you do that. There’s plenty of white people that he called low IQ too. I’m not going to fall for that. I’m not saying you are trying to. You’re not doing anything wrong, Joe. You’re not inaccurate… He’s also accused a lot of white people of having a low IQ as well.” “Let’s not use that as a reason and cause to engage in the racial dynamics of the situation. I’m not taking it that way. I don’t think that Donald Trump does this to black people and not this to white people. I think Donald Trump does anything to anybody who is anti-Trump. He don’t give a d*mn what color, ethnicity, race, or group you are associated with. He could care less. If you are not pro-Trump, you are his enemy, and he treats you like it. That is what I believe.”
1:22

Joe: “Stephen, I’d like to congratulate you for being the latest black person to be called low IQ by President Trump. It’s quite a long and distinguished list of people.” Stephen A. Smith: “Hold on, just because he did that I’m not going to let you do that. There’s plenty of white people that he called low IQ too. I’m not going to fall for that. I’m not saying you are trying to. You’re not doing anything wrong, Joe. You’re not inaccurate… He’s also accused a lot of white people of having a low IQ as well.” “Let’s not use that as a reason and cause to engage in the racial dynamics of the situation. I’m not taking it that way. I don’t think that Donald Trump does this to black people and not this to white people. I think Donald Trump does anything to anybody who is anti-Trump. He don’t give a d*mn what color, ethnicity, race, or group you are associated with. He could care less. If you are not pro-Trump, you are his enemy, and he treats you like it. That is what I believe.”

RedWave Press

858,289 次观看 • 24 天前

Thomas Sowell on the danger of rewarding irresponsibility: “If what you have is the government taking money from people who are personally responsible and giving it to people who are irresponsible or, in many cases, corrupt, that’s not a viable situation for the long term. You’re going to have ever more people being ever more irresponsible.”
0:39

Thomas Sowell on the danger of rewarding irresponsibility: “If what you have is the government taking money from people who are personally responsible and giving it to people who are irresponsible or, in many cases, corrupt, that’s not a viable situation for the long term. You’re going to have ever more people being ever more irresponsible.”

Thomas Sowell Daily

17,655 次观看 • 2 个月前

Palantir CEO Alex Karp on corrosive ideologies in universities: “It is dangerous for America.” “It is dangerous to allow discrimination on our college campuses simply because the people being discriminated against are viewed as successful.” “Corporate people are like, ‘Are you sure you should say that?’” “It’s important for building a software company that you say in public what you say in private.” “We kinda think these things happening across college campuses are the side show. No—they are the show.” “If we lose the intellectual debate—you will not be able to deploy any army in the West ever.”
1:46

Palantir CEO Alex Karp on corrosive ideologies in universities: “It is dangerous for America.” “It is dangerous to allow discrimination on our college campuses simply because the people being discriminated against are viewed as successful.” “Corporate people are like, ‘Are you sure you should say that?’” “It’s important for building a software company that you say in public what you say in private.” “We kinda think these things happening across college campuses are the side show. No—they are the show.” “If we lose the intellectual debate—you will not be able to deploy any army in the West ever.”

Jawwwn

38,932 次观看 • 2 个月前

Is Alan Dershowitz is saying on this clip that people who made accusations are being protected and there is evidence that undermines those accusations that needs to come out? In addition to people who were accused? Dershowitz is not a fire starter. I don’t agree with him on many things politically but when it comes to legal matters that is a different story. I have to be honest and we have to be able to critique our own side. This is not a good look in terms of transparency. So I will say this again, when you make this issue central in your conversations with the American people, you better be prepared to deliver because if you do not deliver, and instead of being honest about why you failed to deliver you below the American people that does not look good . I’m not sure what’s going on with Pam Bondi but I really think that it is in the best interest of the Department of Justice to just have an honest dialogue and disclose whatever they are able to disclose legally. Just explain what happened and be done with this.
1:19

Is Alan Dershowitz is saying on this clip that people who made accusations are being protected and there is evidence that undermines those accusations that needs to come out? In addition to people who were accused? Dershowitz is not a fire starter. I don’t agree with him on many things politically but when it comes to legal matters that is a different story. I have to be honest and we have to be able to critique our own side. This is not a good look in terms of transparency. So I will say this again, when you make this issue central in your conversations with the American people, you better be prepared to deliver because if you do not deliver, and instead of being honest about why you failed to deliver you below the American people that does not look good . I’m not sure what’s going on with Pam Bondi but I really think that it is in the best interest of the Department of Justice to just have an honest dialogue and disclose whatever they are able to disclose legally. Just explain what happened and be done with this.

Insurrection Barbie

22,917 次观看 • 1 年前

BOOM: CNN panel EXPLODES when Scott Jennings argues Americans *should* be proud to live in the greatest country on Earth and that it’s the left who hates this country, hate its history, and fear for the future.... “I like it when our leaders talk about a hopeful future. I think that's good for the country. I — I guess I sort of reject the premise of the conversation a little in that, you know, these are somehow dark times and we're living through this uncertain rough patch. I mean, I'm pretty happy, you know, and I think a lot of people are.” “If you looked at the splits [in an NBC News poll] on how people feel about America, the promise of America, if you look at whether they’re proud of their country or not — ,,Gallup has measured this — Republicans and conservatives are proud to be Americans, and it’s Democrats and liberals who are not. And I think if you looked at the splits in that, you’d find — you — you’d find — you’d find — you’d find the two lines on the graph going this way. And honestly, I mean, I think there’s a political movement in this country right now built on telling people that America is rotten at its core. It’s not the Republican ideology.” “The problem is telling you the truth about the numbers?” “I’m not going to give you a break about the math!” “Yeah. I agree. We have we have Democrats cheering for Iran. I totally agree with you. It’s crazy.” “What you’re raising, though, is the issue of — we’re not living in a shared reality. This is the biggest difference today for the rest of the country’s history. And it's hard to have a shared national purpose when you don’t have a shared reality. And so, I think one of the things we're going to have to grapple with as Americans is, you know, how do we have more of a shared reality when it comes to our political [differences]”
4:23

BOOM: CNN panel EXPLODES when Scott Jennings argues Americans *should* be proud to live in the greatest country on Earth and that it’s the left who hates this country, hate its history, and fear for the future.... “I like it when our leaders talk about a hopeful future. I think that's good for the country. I — I guess I sort of reject the premise of the conversation a little in that, you know, these are somehow dark times and we're living through this uncertain rough patch. I mean, I'm pretty happy, you know, and I think a lot of people are.” “If you looked at the splits [in an NBC News poll] on how people feel about America, the promise of America, if you look at whether they’re proud of their country or not — ,,Gallup has measured this — Republicans and conservatives are proud to be Americans, and it’s Democrats and liberals who are not. And I think if you looked at the splits in that, you’d find — you — you’d find — you’d find — you’d find the two lines on the graph going this way. And honestly, I mean, I think there’s a political movement in this country right now built on telling people that America is rotten at its core. It’s not the Republican ideology.” “The problem is telling you the truth about the numbers?” “I’m not going to give you a break about the math!” “Yeah. I agree. We have we have Democrats cheering for Iran. I totally agree with you. It’s crazy.” “What you’re raising, though, is the issue of — we’re not living in a shared reality. This is the biggest difference today for the rest of the country’s history. And it's hard to have a shared national purpose when you don’t have a shared reality. And so, I think one of the things we're going to have to grapple with as Americans is, you know, how do we have more of a shared reality when it comes to our political [differences]”

Curtis Houck

110,956 次观看 • 2 个月前

"The single biggest mistake people make in this area is: because they're intelligent in one area, they assume they're intelligent in all areas." Alex Karp on why Silicon Valley's culture of presenting as the smartest in the room is a weakness: "You have to be honest, aware about where your aptitude is." "A big failure mechanism in the valley is every valley person is forced to present as if they're the smartest in all areas at all times." "If you don't know who the mark is, you're the mark." "I'm dyslexic and I think one of the reasons I've done so well is ... I do think I'm one of the better people at certain things ... and I know I'm not at everything." "A failure mode for the valley is 'I'm the smartest on every issue ... I need to be the person negotiating this contract.' What if you have no aptitude for that?" "Just because you can do X does not mean you've imputed high aptitude at Y ... it's almost certain that you're just not smart enough to realize how bad you are." Palantir Katherine Boyle
1:26

"The single biggest mistake people make in this area is: because they're intelligent in one area, they assume they're intelligent in all areas." Alex Karp on why Silicon Valley's culture of presenting as the smartest in the room is a weakness: "You have to be honest, aware about where your aptitude is." "A big failure mechanism in the valley is every valley person is forced to present as if they're the smartest in all areas at all times." "If you don't know who the mark is, you're the mark." "I'm dyslexic and I think one of the reasons I've done so well is ... I do think I'm one of the better people at certain things ... and I know I'm not at everything." "A failure mode for the valley is 'I'm the smartest on every issue ... I need to be the person negotiating this contract.' What if you have no aptitude for that?" "Just because you can do X does not mean you've imputed high aptitude at Y ... it's almost certain that you're just not smart enough to realize how bad you are." Palantir Katherine Boyle

a16z

394,744 次观看 • 4 个月前

Obama in 2009: “What's going to happen is you are going to pay a significant fine. You are going to learn English. You are going to -- you are going to go to the back of the line so that you don't get ahead of somebody who was in Mexico City applying legally. But after you've done these things over a certain period of time you can earn your citizenship, so that it's not -- it's not something that is guaranteed or automatic. You've got to earn it. But over time you give people an opportunity. Now, it only works though if you do all the pieces. I think the American people, they appreciate and believe in immigration. But they can't have a situation where you just have half a million people pouring over the border without any kind of mechanism to control it!” Got it… Illegal immigration is wrong.. It must be merit based. And allowing, not just a million, but upwards of 15 million, unvetted 😳illegal immigrants into the Country is disastrous and unfair to everyone including Legal immigrants.
1:11

Obama in 2009: “What's going to happen is you are going to pay a significant fine. You are going to learn English. You are going to -- you are going to go to the back of the line so that you don't get ahead of somebody who was in Mexico City applying legally. But after you've done these things over a certain period of time you can earn your citizenship, so that it's not -- it's not something that is guaranteed or automatic. You've got to earn it. But over time you give people an opportunity. Now, it only works though if you do all the pieces. I think the American people, they appreciate and believe in immigration. But they can't have a situation where you just have half a million people pouring over the border without any kind of mechanism to control it!” Got it… Illegal immigration is wrong.. It must be merit based. And allowing, not just a million, but upwards of 15 million, unvetted 😳illegal immigrants into the Country is disastrous and unfair to everyone including Legal immigrants.

Suzanne 🇺🇸♥️

111,705 次观看 • 1 年前

Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss has an dire warning about Democrats “We're not dealing with a load of social Democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.” “You just can't win. And this is what Donald Trump understands, perhaps uniquely in the Western world. I think there are others who have taken on the deep state. You might point to Victor Orban, you might point to Bukele or Melaye. But really, Donald Trump to me is the playbook of how you need to behave because a lot of people in politics think Because it was the case in the 70s, 80s, that you could reason with the opposition, you could find a compromise, you could be bipartisan, you could persuade people, you could sell it in the media, you could roll the pitch, that that strategy can be adopted now. And I think they're wrong because the opposition have changed. We're not dealing with a load of social democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.” Again, this is from the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
0:59

Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss has an dire warning about Democrats “We're not dealing with a load of social Democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.” “You just can't win. And this is what Donald Trump understands, perhaps uniquely in the Western world. I think there are others who have taken on the deep state. You might point to Victor Orban, you might point to Bukele or Melaye. But really, Donald Trump to me is the playbook of how you need to behave because a lot of people in politics think Because it was the case in the 70s, 80s, that you could reason with the opposition, you could find a compromise, you could be bipartisan, you could persuade people, you could sell it in the media, you could roll the pitch, that that strategy can be adopted now. And I think they're wrong because the opposition have changed. We're not dealing with a load of social democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.” Again, this is from the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

Wall Street Apes

905,269 次观看 • 6 个月前

Palmer Luckey’s advice for founder-led communications “My advice to people would probably be to recognize that the value of your reputation is very high,” Anduril founder Palmer Luckey begins. “If people do not trust you; if they do not believe in what you’re saying; if they do not think that you’re a person worth listening to, they’re going to have a hard time working with you.” Palmer also argues that founders don’t need to be neutral: “You don’t need to be neutral. You can be a propagandist. You can advocate for a particular point of view . . . In general, people should recognize that if you say something where you caveat it and hedge it and basically end up saying something that most people would agree with, you might as well have said nothing at all.” He continues: “You are not going to build a following of people who say, ‘I just love Palmer’s right-down-the-middle, very-hedged takes that everyone agrees with.’ If you’re just restating common sentiment, it’s not going to get you anywhere . . . So one of the things I tell people is, ‘Make sure that when you’re saying something, you’re SAYING something. Make sure you’re trying to persuade and affect change.’ — maybe not in everybody, but in some people. If you make some people love what you’re saying and some people hate what you’re saying, that’s a lot better than having everybody lukewarm agree with you. Don’t waste your time communicating about the things everyone already agrees with you on. Focus on the things where you need to change their mind.” Source: Lulu Cheng Meservey (Sep 2025)
1:42

Palmer Luckey’s advice for founder-led communications “My advice to people would probably be to recognize that the value of your reputation is very high,” Anduril founder Palmer Luckey begins. “If people do not trust you; if they do not believe in what you’re saying; if they do not think that you’re a person worth listening to, they’re going to have a hard time working with you.” Palmer also argues that founders don’t need to be neutral: “You don’t need to be neutral. You can be a propagandist. You can advocate for a particular point of view . . . In general, people should recognize that if you say something where you caveat it and hedge it and basically end up saying something that most people would agree with, you might as well have said nothing at all.” He continues: “You are not going to build a following of people who say, ‘I just love Palmer’s right-down-the-middle, very-hedged takes that everyone agrees with.’ If you’re just restating common sentiment, it’s not going to get you anywhere . . . So one of the things I tell people is, ‘Make sure that when you’re saying something, you’re SAYING something. Make sure you’re trying to persuade and affect change.’ — maybe not in everybody, but in some people. If you make some people love what you’re saying and some people hate what you’re saying, that’s a lot better than having everybody lukewarm agree with you. Don’t waste your time communicating about the things everyone already agrees with you on. Focus on the things where you need to change their mind.” Source: Lulu Cheng Meservey (Sep 2025)

Startup Archive

78,576 次观看 • 1 个月前

Palantir CEO Alex Karp on surveillance, fentanyl, assassinations, guns, and our right to a personal life: “If you’re being told Palantir is the product to use to surveil, you’re the mark. “We’ve seen very destructive, to our core, assassinations of people who had heroic roles. Abe in Japan. Charlie Kirk. The CEO of United Healthcare. We saw people cheering. “Personal life may mean you’re flirting with the person next to you. It may mean you’re at the stadium with someone you shouldn’t be. “Guns are not a problem in society. Guns in the inner city creates most of the deaths. How do you protect the Second Amendment and protect gun deaths in this country? “The only way to take the risk to zero is to eviscerate our civil liberties. “The only way to do that is to reduce ‘deviant behavior’ to zero. And none of us want that, because I’m not the only one who’s a freak show, I’m just more open about it.”
3:34

Palantir CEO Alex Karp on surveillance, fentanyl, assassinations, guns, and our right to a personal life: “If you’re being told Palantir is the product to use to surveil, you’re the mark. “We’ve seen very destructive, to our core, assassinations of people who had heroic roles. Abe in Japan. Charlie Kirk. The CEO of United Healthcare. We saw people cheering. “Personal life may mean you’re flirting with the person next to you. It may mean you’re at the stadium with someone you shouldn’t be. “Guns are not a problem in society. Guns in the inner city creates most of the deaths. How do you protect the Second Amendment and protect gun deaths in this country? “The only way to take the risk to zero is to eviscerate our civil liberties. “The only way to do that is to reduce ‘deviant behavior’ to zero. And none of us want that, because I’m not the only one who’s a freak show, I’m just more open about it.”

Jawwwn

511,383 次观看 • 8 个月前