Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

ALL mRNA COVID VACCINES RECEIVE UPDATED "EXTREMELY HIGH" RISK MYOCARDITIS & LONG-TERM HEART DAMAGE WARNING LABELS. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the Trump administration has formally updated the safety labeling on all mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to reflect what many Americans have been warning about for years:...

TheSCIF's profile picture

The SCIF

326,532 subscribers

24,591 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessWissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Sunshine Sunnybunz
Sunshine Sunnybunzvor 1 Jahr

How many people lost their accounts on social media over this? It’s beyond disgusting, even up until a week ago AI was backing big Pharma.

Profilbild von The SCIF
The SCIFvor 1 Jahr

And once again, we were right. Never took the covid shot, never got covid. Never took a regular flu shot, either. Rarely ever get sick.

Profilbild von ADI 🇺🇸🇮🇱
ADI 🇺🇸🇮🇱vor 1 Jahr

How about we ban these death shots???!!!!🤬

Profilbild von kate
katevor 1 Jahr

Should be banned. Period. No more mRNA.

Profilbild von Head Custodian 🫧
Head Custodian 🫧vor 1 Jahr

I just went to the hospital for heart issue twice this year. Could be the JAB

Profilbild von Brass Tacks
Brass Tacksvor 1 Jahr

No matter how hard they try to pad the facts, these claims used to get you canceled for spreading misinformation and being anti science. They also made you show a vaccine cards in order to get into sporting etc. How insane! Another conspiracy proven right yet again!

Profilbild von The SCIF
The SCIFvor 1 Jahr

🎯

Profilbild von MadCityTech
MadCityTechvor 1 Jahr

The retards will believe you can get myocarditis from covid...

Profilbild von D Ammo
D Ammovor 1 Jahr

We need to lift the ban on lawsuits for Moderna, Pfizer, and JJ. I’ll be the first in line.💔💔💔💔💔💔

Profilbild von Randy (Flawed Human)
Randy (Flawed Human)vor 1 Jahr

Do not take these poison clot shots! You have been warned!

Ähnliche Videos

Then, the FDA made a bombshell announcement. Dr. Vinay Prasad announced a new safety warning for myocarditis associated with mRNA Covid vaccines. He revealed that in the highest-risk demographic, young men between the ages of 12 and 24, the rate of myocarditis and pericarditis is “about 27 per million.”
1:46

Then, the FDA made a bombshell announcement. Dr. Vinay Prasad announced a new safety warning for myocarditis associated with mRNA Covid vaccines. He revealed that in the highest-risk demographic, young men between the ages of 12 and 24, the rate of myocarditis and pericarditis is “about 27 per million.”

MAHA PAC🗽

16,003 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Holy shizzles… did you see what happened today? 🚨 The FDA — mRNA COVID Shots Cause Myocarditis The FDA just Announced a New Safety Warning Label will be put on all of its mRNA COVID Vaccines, citing an extremely high risk if Myocarditis and long term Heart Effects in Young Men in Great, when is it time to remove them from the market altogether… and it’s time for people to go to prison. - Persistent late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI in 60% of young people hospitalized for myocarditis post-vaccination indicates potential long-term heart muscle injury.
15:38

Holy shizzles… did you see what happened today? 🚨 The FDA — mRNA COVID Shots Cause Myocarditis The FDA just Announced a New Safety Warning Label will be put on all of its mRNA COVID Vaccines, citing an extremely high risk if Myocarditis and long term Heart Effects in Young Men in Great, when is it time to remove them from the market altogether… and it’s time for people to go to prison. - Persistent late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI in 60% of young people hospitalized for myocarditis post-vaccination indicates potential long-term heart muscle injury.

MJTruthUltra

932,057 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

FDA Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Linked to Heart Damage in Young Males After years of denial, the FDA has updated its warning label—admitting the COVID vaccine can cause myocarditis, particularly in young males. Key findings from their study: - Persistent abnormal cardiac MRI findings (evidence of heart injury) were common, even months after vaccination. - The study only followed patients for ~5 months—what about long-term effects? Heart muscle cells do not regenerate. - The FDA downplays it, saying the "clinical significance is unknown." But we know: heart damage is serious. The real scandal? - These risks were flagged in early trials but ignored. - Healthy 12-24-year-olds were put at risk—what about those with pre-existing conditions? - Where’s the accountability for those who silenced warnings? This isn’t just a footnote—it’s a betrayal.
1:46

FDA Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Linked to Heart Damage in Young Males After years of denial, the FDA has updated its warning label—admitting the COVID vaccine can cause myocarditis, particularly in young males. Key findings from their study: - Persistent abnormal cardiac MRI findings (evidence of heart injury) were common, even months after vaccination. - The study only followed patients for ~5 months—what about long-term effects? Heart muscle cells do not regenerate. - The FDA downplays it, saying the "clinical significance is unknown." But we know: heart damage is serious. The real scandal? - These risks were flagged in early trials but ignored. - Healthy 12-24-year-olds were put at risk—what about those with pre-existing conditions? - Where’s the accountability for those who silenced warnings? This isn’t just a footnote—it’s a betrayal.

Camus

71,809 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇸 FORMER FDA CHIEF: YES, THE BIDEN ADMIN WITHHELD HEART RISK DATA ON COVID VACCINES Former Biden FDA Commissioner Robert Califf just admitted what many suspected: the Biden administration sat on critical safety data showing heart inflammation risks, especially in young men, from COVID vaccines. The data flagged elevated rates of myocarditis, but instead of alerting the public, officials delayed and deflected. Califf now says they “should have communicated faster,” but that’s little comfort for parents whose teenage sons were told the shots were “safe and effective” with no mention of cardiac risks. This wasn't a messaging glitch, but a deliberate choice to keep Americans in the dark during a public health campaign. Turns out, "trust the science" came with fine print they forgot to show us. Who knows if there is more information that the Biden administration stayed silent on in order to further their own “health” agenda and campaign. Source: NBC News
0:58

🚨🇺🇸 FORMER FDA CHIEF: YES, THE BIDEN ADMIN WITHHELD HEART RISK DATA ON COVID VACCINES Former Biden FDA Commissioner Robert Califf just admitted what many suspected: the Biden administration sat on critical safety data showing heart inflammation risks, especially in young men, from COVID vaccines. The data flagged elevated rates of myocarditis, but instead of alerting the public, officials delayed and deflected. Califf now says they “should have communicated faster,” but that’s little comfort for parents whose teenage sons were told the shots were “safe and effective” with no mention of cardiac risks. This wasn't a messaging glitch, but a deliberate choice to keep Americans in the dark during a public health campaign. Turns out, "trust the science" came with fine print they forgot to show us. Who knows if there is more information that the Biden administration stayed silent on in order to further their own “health” agenda and campaign. Source: NBC News

Mario Nawfal

90,884 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

DISTURBING: The FDA just gave FULL approval to Moderna’s mRNA COVID shot for babies—a move critics call a shocking betrayal of public trust. It targets “high-risk” kids as young as 6 months—a dangerously broad label that includes nearly half of all children—setting up relentless pressure on parents and doctors to comply. Despite years of data linking these injections to heart damage, brain injury, cancer risks, and death, the FDA signed off without demanding new safety trials. This contradicts everything we were promised about safety testing. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH calls the decision “disastrous,” warning it’s the same reckless emergency-era playbook now given a permanent green light. “If we want to make America healthy again, these shots have to be completely removed from the market and banned for human use,” he stressed. Who stands to gain from this? And what does it mean for the MAHA movement? Don't miss 's explosive report.
12:35

DISTURBING: The FDA just gave FULL approval to Moderna’s mRNA COVID shot for babies—a move critics call a shocking betrayal of public trust. It targets “high-risk” kids as young as 6 months—a dangerously broad label that includes nearly half of all children—setting up relentless pressure on parents and doctors to comply. Despite years of data linking these injections to heart damage, brain injury, cancer risks, and death, the FDA signed off without demanding new safety trials. This contradicts everything we were promised about safety testing. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH calls the decision “disastrous,” warning it’s the same reckless emergency-era playbook now given a permanent green light. “If we want to make America healthy again, these shots have to be completely removed from the market and banned for human use,” he stressed. Who stands to gain from this? And what does it mean for the MAHA movement? Don't miss 's explosive report.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

107,327 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

12 MILLION DOSES OF PFIZER mRNA COVID JAB ADMINISTERED IN NZ BEFORE VACCINATORS WERE MANDATED TO INFORM VACINEES OF MYOCARDITIS RISK... Today in the NZ Herald, journalist Derek Chen published an incredibly thorough and well referenced deep dive into Government decision making (and withholding of information) relating to Covid injection recommendations to NZ teens (and their parents). It is incredibly frustrating to find such a significant article placed behind a paywall, and not reproduced in the printed newspaper. Here I focus on just one small aspect of the article....small in word count but ENORMOUS in real life negative impact. Quote: The Royal Commission Phase Two report said efforts to communicate the risk of heart inflammation were “extensive”, but VACCINATORS DIDN'T ALWAYS TELL CLIENTS ABOUT THE RISKS, NOR DID THEIR GUIDELINES ALWAYS REQUIRE THEM TO. At the time of Petousis-Harris’ email, September 2021, the Ministry of Health’s guidance for District Health Boards (DHBs) and providers mentioned heart inflammation as a rare side effect “BUT DID NOT RECOMMEND IT BE DISCUSSED WITH PATIENTS BEFORE ADMINISTERING THE VACCINE" the commission’s report said. In December 2021, providers were told to inform clients about possible symptoms, but “GUIDANCE WAS NOT ALWAYS EXPLICIT ABOUT THE NEED TO DISCUSS THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS, INCLUDING BEFORE VACCINATING, AS PART OF THE INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS" It wasn’t until MORE THAN A YEAR LATER in February 2023, that this guidance was updated to “EXPLICITLY REQUIRE vaccinators to discuss the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as part of the informed consent process”. Guidance from the Immunisation Advisory Centre was updated to include this requirement in July 2022, though its clinical toolkit included information about myocarditis from November 2021 and its training courses for vaccinators included such information from July 2021. The importance of this for informed consent was underlined in a 2024 report from the Health and Disability Commissioner about a man in his 20s who died in 2021 from myocarditis caused by the vaccine he’d received at a pharmacy 12 days earlier. (RORY NAIRN) “The consumer WAS NOT INFORMED about the risk of myocarditis either prior to receiving the vaccine (as part of the informed consent process) or after (as part of safety-netting advice),” the report said. “Notwithstanding the low probability of occurrence, the risk of myocarditis was something that a reasonable consumer at the time would have expected to be informed about. “Official information sources did not make it adequately clear to vaccinators that consumers needed to be told about myocarditis prior to receiving the vaccination.” NZ VACCINATORS WERE NOT MANDATED TO INFORM COVID 19 VACINEES OF THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS UNTIL FEBRUARY 2023. In order to understand the degree of negligence and medical malpractice inherent in this timeline, I encourage you to fully read a detailed global Myocarditis timeline, compiled painstakingly by one of the Health Forum team: 12 Millions of doses of Pfizer mRNA were administered in New Zealand, including to teens and young men and greatest risk of mRNA induced Myocarditis WITH ZERO MANDATE FOR FULL INFORMED CONSENT AND ZERO MENTION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF POTENTIALLY DEADLY HEART DAMAGE - MYOCARDITIS Below is a video of Rory Nairn's mum, Christine. Rory, aged 26, died suddenly from Myocarditis, later confirmed causally linked to receipt of the Pfizer mRNA in New Zealand. He was not told of this risk at the time of his injection or afterwards. He died suddenly in his bathroom in the middle of the night, less than 2 weeks later. Aged 26
33:27

12 MILLION DOSES OF PFIZER mRNA COVID JAB ADMINISTERED IN NZ BEFORE VACCINATORS WERE MANDATED TO INFORM VACINEES OF MYOCARDITIS RISK... Today in the NZ Herald, journalist Derek Chen published an incredibly thorough and well referenced deep dive into Government decision making (and withholding of information) relating to Covid injection recommendations to NZ teens (and their parents). It is incredibly frustrating to find such a significant article placed behind a paywall, and not reproduced in the printed newspaper. Here I focus on just one small aspect of the article....small in word count but ENORMOUS in real life negative impact. Quote: The Royal Commission Phase Two report said efforts to communicate the risk of heart inflammation were “extensive”, but VACCINATORS DIDN'T ALWAYS TELL CLIENTS ABOUT THE RISKS, NOR DID THEIR GUIDELINES ALWAYS REQUIRE THEM TO. At the time of Petousis-Harris’ email, September 2021, the Ministry of Health’s guidance for District Health Boards (DHBs) and providers mentioned heart inflammation as a rare side effect “BUT DID NOT RECOMMEND IT BE DISCUSSED WITH PATIENTS BEFORE ADMINISTERING THE VACCINE" the commission’s report said. In December 2021, providers were told to inform clients about possible symptoms, but “GUIDANCE WAS NOT ALWAYS EXPLICIT ABOUT THE NEED TO DISCUSS THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS, INCLUDING BEFORE VACCINATING, AS PART OF THE INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS" It wasn’t until MORE THAN A YEAR LATER in February 2023, that this guidance was updated to “EXPLICITLY REQUIRE vaccinators to discuss the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as part of the informed consent process”. Guidance from the Immunisation Advisory Centre was updated to include this requirement in July 2022, though its clinical toolkit included information about myocarditis from November 2021 and its training courses for vaccinators included such information from July 2021. The importance of this for informed consent was underlined in a 2024 report from the Health and Disability Commissioner about a man in his 20s who died in 2021 from myocarditis caused by the vaccine he’d received at a pharmacy 12 days earlier. (RORY NAIRN) “The consumer WAS NOT INFORMED about the risk of myocarditis either prior to receiving the vaccine (as part of the informed consent process) or after (as part of safety-netting advice),” the report said. “Notwithstanding the low probability of occurrence, the risk of myocarditis was something that a reasonable consumer at the time would have expected to be informed about. “Official information sources did not make it adequately clear to vaccinators that consumers needed to be told about myocarditis prior to receiving the vaccination.” NZ VACCINATORS WERE NOT MANDATED TO INFORM COVID 19 VACINEES OF THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS UNTIL FEBRUARY 2023. In order to understand the degree of negligence and medical malpractice inherent in this timeline, I encourage you to fully read a detailed global Myocarditis timeline, compiled painstakingly by one of the Health Forum team: 12 Millions of doses of Pfizer mRNA were administered in New Zealand, including to teens and young men and greatest risk of mRNA induced Myocarditis WITH ZERO MANDATE FOR FULL INFORMED CONSENT AND ZERO MENTION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF POTENTIALLY DEADLY HEART DAMAGE - MYOCARDITIS Below is a video of Rory Nairn's mum, Christine. Rory, aged 26, died suddenly from Myocarditis, later confirmed causally linked to receipt of the Pfizer mRNA in New Zealand. He was not told of this risk at the time of his injection or afterwards. He died suddenly in his bathroom in the middle of the night, less than 2 weeks later. Aged 26

NZ and the MRNA

17,026 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Alberta government COVID-19 review calls for immediate halt to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, citing safety concerns The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy. The review was initiated in 2022 under the leadership of Dr. Gary Davidson, a clinical lead in emergency medicine in central Alberta. Dr. Davidson was tasked with evaluating the pandemic’s response, focusing on various aspects such as non-pharmaceutical interventions (masking and lockdowns), the accuracy of predictive modelling, and the role regulatory bodies played in the response. Experts like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Byram Bridle, and Dr. David Speicher contributed to the investigation, each bringing their expertise to bear on a comprehensive assessment of pandemic policies. Among the most striking findings of the report is the task force’s criticism of Health Canada’s decision-making process for the rushed to market novel modified RNA injections. The group points out that there were “significant gaps” in the data supporting the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, Health Canada has failed to disclose whether a proper risk assessment was ever conducted to justify the widespread use of these vaccines in individuals under 18, particularly considering the lack of long-term clinical data. One of the most disturbing aspects highlighted in the review is the data from Pfizer’s post-authorization trial. The report reveals that 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries were reported within just four days of vaccination. Notably, nearly half of these adverse events occurred in individuals aged 18-50—those at negligible risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This troubling information calls into question the overall safety profile of the vaccines, especially in young and healthy populations. The report also discusses the known risks associated with the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to deliver the modified RNA and spike protein into cells. These synthetic fat molecules have a well-documented toxicity profile, and there are concerns about the long-term health impacts of repeated doses. Furthermore, the review raises alarms over the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two heart conditions that can have lifelong and potentially fatal consequences, particularly for young individuals. Another critical aspect addressed in the Alberta report is the rushed approval process for these vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization. The review underscores that while such a pathway is easier to navigate in times of crisis, it becomes incredibly challenging to reverse decisions once questions about safety arise. The task force also points out the difficulty of obtaining accurate data on vaccine safety and efficacy within Alberta’s publicly funded healthcare system, making it almost impossible to conduct independent analysis or verification of safety claims made. The Alberta report draws attention to the discrepancies in the clinical trials, which were plagued by inadequate follow-up, missing data, and conflicts of interest. The interim findings of Pfizer’s clinical trial revealed that 21 deaths occurred in the vaccinated group compared to 17 in the placebo group, with an alarming 3.7-fold increase in cardiac events. Moreover, the report highlights issues with underreporting adverse events, noting that only 1-10% of adverse events were properly documented. Even more concerning is the data on pregnant women, which reveals a devastating 87.5% fetal/neonatal mortality rate in the limited trials conducted. These findings, alongside the acknowledged risks of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system, underscore the need for a re-evaluation of the vaccines' safety profile. Despite the mounting evidence, the public health narrative has largely ignored these critical concerns, dismissing them as misinformation. However, the Alberta review demands transparency, accountability, and a rigorous risk-benefit analysis moving forward. As the province calls for a halt to the use of these vaccines in healthy young individuals, the question remains: will these calls be heeded, or will the push for blanket vaccination recommendations continue unchecked? The review emphasizes the need for a more cautious, evidence-based approach in future pandemic responses, prioritizing transparency and informed consent over knee-jerk policies. The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy.
12:45

Alberta government COVID-19 review calls for immediate halt to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, citing safety concerns The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy. The review was initiated in 2022 under the leadership of Dr. Gary Davidson, a clinical lead in emergency medicine in central Alberta. Dr. Davidson was tasked with evaluating the pandemic’s response, focusing on various aspects such as non-pharmaceutical interventions (masking and lockdowns), the accuracy of predictive modelling, and the role regulatory bodies played in the response. Experts like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Byram Bridle, and Dr. David Speicher contributed to the investigation, each bringing their expertise to bear on a comprehensive assessment of pandemic policies. Among the most striking findings of the report is the task force’s criticism of Health Canada’s decision-making process for the rushed to market novel modified RNA injections. The group points out that there were “significant gaps” in the data supporting the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. In fact, Health Canada has failed to disclose whether a proper risk assessment was ever conducted to justify the widespread use of these vaccines in individuals under 18, particularly considering the lack of long-term clinical data. One of the most disturbing aspects highlighted in the review is the data from Pfizer’s post-authorization trial. The report reveals that 1,223 deaths and 42,086 injuries were reported within just four days of vaccination. Notably, nearly half of these adverse events occurred in individuals aged 18-50—those at negligible risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes. This troubling information calls into question the overall safety profile of the vaccines, especially in young and healthy populations. The report also discusses the known risks associated with the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to deliver the modified RNA and spike protein into cells. These synthetic fat molecules have a well-documented toxicity profile, and there are concerns about the long-term health impacts of repeated doses. Furthermore, the review raises alarms over the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, two heart conditions that can have lifelong and potentially fatal consequences, particularly for young individuals. Another critical aspect addressed in the Alberta report is the rushed approval process for these vaccines under Emergency Use Authorization. The review underscores that while such a pathway is easier to navigate in times of crisis, it becomes incredibly challenging to reverse decisions once questions about safety arise. The task force also points out the difficulty of obtaining accurate data on vaccine safety and efficacy within Alberta’s publicly funded healthcare system, making it almost impossible to conduct independent analysis or verification of safety claims made. The Alberta report draws attention to the discrepancies in the clinical trials, which were plagued by inadequate follow-up, missing data, and conflicts of interest. The interim findings of Pfizer’s clinical trial revealed that 21 deaths occurred in the vaccinated group compared to 17 in the placebo group, with an alarming 3.7-fold increase in cardiac events. Moreover, the report highlights issues with underreporting adverse events, noting that only 1-10% of adverse events were properly documented. Even more concerning is the data on pregnant women, which reveals a devastating 87.5% fetal/neonatal mortality rate in the limited trials conducted. These findings, alongside the acknowledged risks of the lipid nanoparticle delivery system, underscore the need for a re-evaluation of the vaccines' safety profile. Despite the mounting evidence, the public health narrative has largely ignored these critical concerns, dismissing them as misinformation. However, the Alberta review demands transparency, accountability, and a rigorous risk-benefit analysis moving forward. As the province calls for a halt to the use of these vaccines in healthy young individuals, the question remains: will these calls be heeded, or will the push for blanket vaccination recommendations continue unchecked? The review emphasizes the need for a more cautious, evidence-based approach in future pandemic responses, prioritizing transparency and informed consent over knee-jerk policies. The Alberta government’s newly, albeit quietly, released COVID-19 response review has made waves with its bold recommendations, especially its call for an immediate halt to the use of the novel, modified RNA COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for healthy children and teenagers. This critical report, commissioned by Premier Danielle Smith, uncovers alarming gaps in the data used to authorize these vaccines and raises serious concerns about their safety and efficacy.

Rebel News

125,819 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: FDA APPROVES NEW PFIZER AND MODERNA XFG COVID-19 mRNA SHOTS BASED ON DATA FROM JUST 8–10 MICE NO HUMAN CLINICAL TRIAL DATA on the new XFG formulations were available before approval—the required human safety and immunogenicity studies begin AFTER FDA approval. The reach of these dangerous approvals is sweeping: Pfizer can now be given to every American age 65 and older and to “high-risk” individuals as young as 5, while Moderna extends all the way down to “high-risk” infants just 6 months old. The previous COVID shots have already been linked to MILLIONS of deaths, injuries, and disabilities, along with demonstrated cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity, body-wide biodistribution, and years-long persistence. This is extremely worrisome and needs to be reversed IMMEDIATELY.
1:21

BREAKING: FDA APPROVES NEW PFIZER AND MODERNA XFG COVID-19 mRNA SHOTS BASED ON DATA FROM JUST 8–10 MICE NO HUMAN CLINICAL TRIAL DATA on the new XFG formulations were available before approval—the required human safety and immunogenicity studies begin AFTER FDA approval. The reach of these dangerous approvals is sweeping: Pfizer can now be given to every American age 65 and older and to “high-risk” individuals as young as 5, while Moderna extends all the way down to “high-risk” infants just 6 months old. The previous COVID shots have already been linked to MILLIONS of deaths, injuries, and disabilities, along with demonstrated cardiotoxicity, neurotoxicity, carcinogenicity, body-wide biodistribution, and years-long persistence. This is extremely worrisome and needs to be reversed IMMEDIATELY.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

56,164 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

🚨 COVID-19 Vaccines: Should They Be Removed From the Market? Leading international physicians and scientists are calling for a global moratorium on mRNA vaccines after mounting evidence of harm. The data is in—heart damage, clotting, and long-term unknowns can no longer be ignored. It’s time to confront what public health agencies won’t. 👉 Help us fund independent medical research and protect patient safety worldwide. ➡️ Donate today: Credit: Presented by MWM (Menschliche Wissenschaft und Medizin), World Council for Health (WCH) North Group, and CSmedicus.org 📺 Watch the full international conference: #MedicalFreedom
0:50

🚨 COVID-19 Vaccines: Should They Be Removed From the Market? Leading international physicians and scientists are calling for a global moratorium on mRNA vaccines after mounting evidence of harm. The data is in—heart damage, clotting, and long-term unknowns can no longer be ignored. It’s time to confront what public health agencies won’t. 👉 Help us fund independent medical research and protect patient safety worldwide. ➡️ Donate today: Credit: Presented by MWM (Menschliche Wissenschaft und Medizin), World Council for Health (WCH) North Group, and CSmedicus.org 📺 Watch the full international conference: #MedicalFreedom

McCullough Foundation

32,660 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨INSIDE mRNA VACCINES - PREMIERING AUGUST 11TH🚨 This new groundbreaking film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology - and the complex scientific and regulatory questions it continues to raise. At its heart, the story follows scientists and physicians who voice concerns about potential gaps in data transparency, risk assessment, and long-term safety - not to discredit science, but to uphold its highest standards. #MFEducation
1:05

🚨INSIDE mRNA VACCINES - PREMIERING AUGUST 11TH🚨 This new groundbreaking film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology - and the complex scientific and regulatory questions it continues to raise. At its heart, the story follows scientists and physicians who voice concerns about potential gaps in data transparency, risk assessment, and long-term safety - not to discredit science, but to uphold its highest standards. #MFEducation

McCullough Foundation

70,233 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Megyn Kelly & FDA Chief on COVID Accountability In a striking interview, Megyn Kelly pressed FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary on a critical question: Was there a deliberate cover-up of COVID vaccine risks by agencies like the FDA and NIH? Kelly suggested officials may have "scrubbed the record" before departing, but questioned if any evidence of misconduct remained. Dr. Makary’s response was a stunning admission. He confirmed that officials were, in fact, "sitting on data" concerning myocarditis in young, healthy individuals—and failed to act in a timely manner. The FDA's response, he stated, was to issue a strong warning and change its policy. Notably, the agency will no longer offer a "rubber stamp" for annual vaccines for healthy children without clinical trial data—a direct result of the loss of trust, evidenced by 85% of healthcare workers rejecting the last booster. While Dr. Makary pivoted to a forward-looking stance, the takeaway is clear: A top official has publicly acknowledged that federal health agencies withheld vital safety information from the public. The conversation on accountability has officially begun.
1:08

Megyn Kelly & FDA Chief on COVID Accountability In a striking interview, Megyn Kelly pressed FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary on a critical question: Was there a deliberate cover-up of COVID vaccine risks by agencies like the FDA and NIH? Kelly suggested officials may have "scrubbed the record" before departing, but questioned if any evidence of misconduct remained. Dr. Makary’s response was a stunning admission. He confirmed that officials were, in fact, "sitting on data" concerning myocarditis in young, healthy individuals—and failed to act in a timely manner. The FDA's response, he stated, was to issue a strong warning and change its policy. Notably, the agency will no longer offer a "rubber stamp" for annual vaccines for healthy children without clinical trial data—a direct result of the loss of trust, evidenced by 85% of healthcare workers rejecting the last booster. While Dr. Makary pivoted to a forward-looking stance, the takeaway is clear: A top official has publicly acknowledged that federal health agencies withheld vital safety information from the public. The conversation on accountability has officially begun.

Camus

398,461 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Another COVID Vax “Conspiracy Theory” Becomes Reality A massive UK study involving 1.7 million kids has found that heart damage, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis, only occurred in children who received COVID mRNA vaccines. According to the study, “Zero cases of myocarditis or pericarditis were found in the unvaccinated group.” The study, led by Oxford University’s Professor Colm D Andrews., was released as a preprint in the MedRxiv journal. The researchers confirmed that, despite widespread vaccination efforts, "the virus did not put children at risk of death or the need for emergency care, hospitalization, or critical care." The study found that COVID-19 vaccines offered little long-term protection, as many children caught the virus just 14 to 15 weeks after getting the shot. The “conspiracy theorists” warned parents years ago that the COVID shots were all risk and no reward. Now, they've been proven true once again. Alex Jones
1:10

Another COVID Vax “Conspiracy Theory” Becomes Reality A massive UK study involving 1.7 million kids has found that heart damage, specifically myocarditis and pericarditis, only occurred in children who received COVID mRNA vaccines. According to the study, “Zero cases of myocarditis or pericarditis were found in the unvaccinated group.” The study, led by Oxford University’s Professor Colm D Andrews., was released as a preprint in the MedRxiv journal. The researchers confirmed that, despite widespread vaccination efforts, "the virus did not put children at risk of death or the need for emergency care, hospitalization, or critical care." The study found that COVID-19 vaccines offered little long-term protection, as many children caught the virus just 14 to 15 weeks after getting the shot. The “conspiracy theorists” warned parents years ago that the COVID shots were all risk and no reward. Now, they've been proven true once again. Alex Jones

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

113,487 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Health Canada knew of mRNA vaccine heart risks before rollout, and now young Canadians face the consequences Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada were aware of myocarditis and pericarditis risks linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines before granting interim approval to Pfizer in December 2020, internal records confirm. Yet as cases of heart failure climb among previously healthy young Canadians, legacy media outlets and so-called ‘experts’ alike report and comment on the trend without mentioning the well-documented signal. Last week, CTV highlighted a Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Failure Society release warning of a “perfect storm” driving higher diagnoses in adults aged 20 to 40. Cardiologist Dr. Margot Davis noted the increase at specialized clinics, yet the coverage conveniently omitted any reference to COVID-19 vaccination, despite documented risks to heart health. A parliamentary Order Paper response (Q-766) reveals that the first Canadian report of myocarditis or pericarditis following an mRNA injection arrived on December 4, 2020 — that’s five days before Health Canada’s interim authorization of Pfizer’s vaccine on December 9. That safety signal continued to mount throughout the rollout, the official parliamentary response shows. As of January 26, 2026, Health Canada’s Canada Vigilance Program has logged 2,040 domestic and 29,619 foreign reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. Despite early warning signs, public warnings did not appear until closer to June 2021. Internal documents obtained through access-to-information requests and compiled by medical and regulatory investigator Natasha Gonek paint a very clear picture: minutes from the federal Vaccine Vigilance Working Group (records never intended for public release) show myocarditis and pericarditis were tracked as priorities from December 2020 onward. A December 17, 2020, Record of Discussion (ROD) noted that information on myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombotic disorders would be posted online the week of December 21. Despite the seriousness of these risks, that information remained largely buried from public view. Ontario data analyst Kelly Brown identified sharp increases in risk of heart inflammation, primarily among young males, after examining provincial safety signals in early 2021. Other provincial figures and federal monitoring systems told the same story, while Public Health Agency of Canada employees sat on surveillance teams co-authoring studies cited by the department as evidence of safety. Meanwhile, the public received heavily narrative-controlled propaganda intended to preserve the ‘safe and effective’ marketing mantra at all costs. A Privy Council Office memo titled “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization” explicitly discussed managing public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination efforts. Officials tested language designed to emphasize rarity and preserve trust, rather than to disclose the mounting age- and sex-specific risks. Canadians were repeatedly told that adverse events are rare and that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the unknown risks. Today, some of the young people who were sold this narrative five years ago are now appearing in heart-failure clinics, unable to walk more than a few feet without debilitating exhaustion. This raises alarming, and still very pertinent, questions about the COVID response, such as why early signals were so severely downplayed, whether age- and sex-specific risks were truly communicated transparently, and what follow-up exists for those diagnosed with vaccine-associated myocarditis? Legacy media’s continued silence on the documented timeline only serves to deepen public distrust in institutions that aided in ‘the science is settled’ narrative. The receipts — from internal records, parliamentary answers, and surveillance data — have been available for years, yet the subject remains so taboo that much of the legacy media and expert class still refuse to confront it openly. REPORT by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦
7:35

Health Canada knew of mRNA vaccine heart risks before rollout, and now young Canadians face the consequences Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada were aware of myocarditis and pericarditis risks linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines before granting interim approval to Pfizer in December 2020, internal records confirm. Yet as cases of heart failure climb among previously healthy young Canadians, legacy media outlets and so-called ‘experts’ alike report and comment on the trend without mentioning the well-documented signal. Last week, CTV highlighted a Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Failure Society release warning of a “perfect storm” driving higher diagnoses in adults aged 20 to 40. Cardiologist Dr. Margot Davis noted the increase at specialized clinics, yet the coverage conveniently omitted any reference to COVID-19 vaccination, despite documented risks to heart health. A parliamentary Order Paper response (Q-766) reveals that the first Canadian report of myocarditis or pericarditis following an mRNA injection arrived on December 4, 2020 — that’s five days before Health Canada’s interim authorization of Pfizer’s vaccine on December 9. That safety signal continued to mount throughout the rollout, the official parliamentary response shows. As of January 26, 2026, Health Canada’s Canada Vigilance Program has logged 2,040 domestic and 29,619 foreign reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. Despite early warning signs, public warnings did not appear until closer to June 2021. Internal documents obtained through access-to-information requests and compiled by medical and regulatory investigator Natasha Gonek paint a very clear picture: minutes from the federal Vaccine Vigilance Working Group (records never intended for public release) show myocarditis and pericarditis were tracked as priorities from December 2020 onward. A December 17, 2020, Record of Discussion (ROD) noted that information on myocarditis, pericarditis and thrombotic disorders would be posted online the week of December 21. Despite the seriousness of these risks, that information remained largely buried from public view. Ontario data analyst Kelly Brown identified sharp increases in risk of heart inflammation, primarily among young males, after examining provincial safety signals in early 2021. Other provincial figures and federal monitoring systems told the same story, while Public Health Agency of Canada employees sat on surveillance teams co-authoring studies cited by the department as evidence of safety. Meanwhile, the public received heavily narrative-controlled propaganda intended to preserve the ‘safe and effective’ marketing mantra at all costs. A Privy Council Office memo titled “Testing Behaviourally-Informed Messaging In Response To Severe Adverse Events Following Immunization” explicitly discussed managing public confidence in COVID-19 vaccination efforts. Officials tested language designed to emphasize rarity and preserve trust, rather than to disclose the mounting age- and sex-specific risks. Canadians were repeatedly told that adverse events are rare and that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the unknown risks. Today, some of the young people who were sold this narrative five years ago are now appearing in heart-failure clinics, unable to walk more than a few feet without debilitating exhaustion. This raises alarming, and still very pertinent, questions about the COVID response, such as why early signals were so severely downplayed, whether age- and sex-specific risks were truly communicated transparently, and what follow-up exists for those diagnosed with vaccine-associated myocarditis? Legacy media’s continued silence on the documented timeline only serves to deepen public distrust in institutions that aided in ‘the science is settled’ narrative. The receipts — from internal records, parliamentary answers, and surveillance data — have been available for years, yet the subject remains so taboo that much of the legacy media and expert class still refuse to confront it openly. REPORT by Tamara Ugolini 🇨🇦

Rebel News

62,766 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Is the increase in cardiac arrests the result of the mRNA vaccines? Health Officials belatedly recognised Myocarditis and Pericarditis as a side effect of the mRNA vaccines AFTER the rollout of the vaccine. It is a known fact that these Heart conditions lead to a greater chance of cardiac arrests and cardiomyopathy. The TGA, the Australian government and John Skerritt are implicit in covering up these risks and then gaslighting the associated deaths and injuries from these, along with many other conditions from the jab. And I quote: “A majority of sudden death cases are linked to coronary heart disease, heart attacks, and heart failure. While the incidence of sudden death from myocarditis in older adults is unknown, roughly 1-9% of deceased patients are found to have evidence of cardiac inflammation. However, in young adults, nearly 20% of sudden death cases are linked to myocarditis.” The argument that Covid is more deadly than the vaccine is wrong as well because the vaccine was codon optimised to increased expression of the spike protein thus making it more toxic and inducing a stronger autoimmune response by the T cells damaging organs. And I quote from the TGA’s own report: “The V9 variant was selected as the clinical candidate. V8 and V9 have identical amino acid sequences of the encoded antigens and differ only in their codon optimisation sequences, which were designed to improve antigen expression (V9) with higher content of cytosine ribonucleotides.” Quote from: #auspol
1:44

Is the increase in cardiac arrests the result of the mRNA vaccines? Health Officials belatedly recognised Myocarditis and Pericarditis as a side effect of the mRNA vaccines AFTER the rollout of the vaccine. It is a known fact that these Heart conditions lead to a greater chance of cardiac arrests and cardiomyopathy. The TGA, the Australian government and John Skerritt are implicit in covering up these risks and then gaslighting the associated deaths and injuries from these, along with many other conditions from the jab. And I quote: “A majority of sudden death cases are linked to coronary heart disease, heart attacks, and heart failure. While the incidence of sudden death from myocarditis in older adults is unknown, roughly 1-9% of deceased patients are found to have evidence of cardiac inflammation. However, in young adults, nearly 20% of sudden death cases are linked to myocarditis.” The argument that Covid is more deadly than the vaccine is wrong as well because the vaccine was codon optimised to increased expression of the spike protein thus making it more toxic and inducing a stronger autoimmune response by the T cells damaging organs. And I quote from the TGA’s own report: “The V9 variant was selected as the clinical candidate. V8 and V9 have identical amino acid sequences of the encoded antigens and differ only in their codon optimisation sequences, which were designed to improve antigen expression (V9) with higher content of cytosine ribonucleotides.” Quote from: #auspol

Gerard Rennick

75,987 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

CRUCIAL mRNA CHILD SAFETY RECOMMENDATION CONCEALED FROM CABINET... (start watching the video from 1:38 mark) Today the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 Lessons Learned findings were made public. One of the findings generating the greatest amount of media response, surrounds a series of events that I posted endlessly about at the time....and not a single media platform picked the story up. The chief technical advisory committee for Covid vaccines (CV TAG) made the recommendation that children and teens under the age of 18 should not be forced to have two doses of Pfizer mRNA to comply with mandates, or to receive vaccines passes. Why? Because it was known that this was the demographic at greatest risk of mRNA induced MYOCARDITIS....and their risk of serious illness or death from Covid infection was extremely small. THIS RECOMMENDATION WAS CONCEALED FROM CABINET and our children from age 12 to 18 were mandated to take two doses, significantly increasing their risk of MYOCARDITIS AND SUB CLINICAL MYOCARDITIS NZ First Shane Jones today said the following... *NZ first will prosecute questions in the House to Labour as to why they CONCEALED information and how and why they failed parents of NZ *Chris Hipkins claims the recommendation was never provided to cabinet and ministers *Jones says Hipkins either CONCEALED the information or the level of ineptitude was so spectacular he has ENDANGERED THE HEALTH long term of hundreds of thousands of NZ children. Quote: "I SAY THAT LEVEL OF IGNORANCE IS INDICTABLE" (link to original video in comments)
3:56

CRUCIAL mRNA CHILD SAFETY RECOMMENDATION CONCEALED FROM CABINET... (start watching the video from 1:38 mark) Today the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 Lessons Learned findings were made public. One of the findings generating the greatest amount of media response, surrounds a series of events that I posted endlessly about at the time....and not a single media platform picked the story up. The chief technical advisory committee for Covid vaccines (CV TAG) made the recommendation that children and teens under the age of 18 should not be forced to have two doses of Pfizer mRNA to comply with mandates, or to receive vaccines passes. Why? Because it was known that this was the demographic at greatest risk of mRNA induced MYOCARDITIS....and their risk of serious illness or death from Covid infection was extremely small. THIS RECOMMENDATION WAS CONCEALED FROM CABINET and our children from age 12 to 18 were mandated to take two doses, significantly increasing their risk of MYOCARDITIS AND SUB CLINICAL MYOCARDITIS NZ First Shane Jones today said the following... *NZ first will prosecute questions in the House to Labour as to why they CONCEALED information and how and why they failed parents of NZ *Chris Hipkins claims the recommendation was never provided to cabinet and ministers *Jones says Hipkins either CONCEALED the information or the level of ineptitude was so spectacular he has ENDANGERED THE HEALTH long term of hundreds of thousands of NZ children. Quote: "I SAY THAT LEVEL OF IGNORANCE IS INDICTABLE" (link to original video in comments)

NZ and the MRNA

37,873 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten