Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Allentown rd bound 📍pull uppp 🤫😈 #trans #dmvfreaks #dcfreaks #mdfreaks #pgfreaks #304freaks which one y’all like more

30,631 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang says one scaling law multiplies AI faster than NVIDIA can hire engineers. Most people know three AI scaling laws. Pre-training. Post-training. Test-time. Each one multiplies intelligence by throwing more compute at a different stage. Jensen Huang says there's a fourth and it's the one that will dominate... Agentic scaling law. "During test time, that agentic system goes off and does research, bangs on databases, uses tools," Huang says. "And one of the most important things it does is spawn off a whole bunch of sub-agents." That's the multiplier. One AI worker can become a team. Then a department. Then a company. "It's so much easier to scale NVIDIA by hiring more employees than it is to scale myself," Huang says. Now imagine scaling without a payroll constraint. "The agentic scaling law — it's kind of like multiplying AI," Huang says. "We could spin off agents as fast as you want to spin off agents." Each agent spins off sub-agents. Each sub-agent spins off more. The compute requirement compounds inside a single query. And every agent generates new data, new experiences, new edge cases. "Wow, this is really good. We ought to memorize this," Huang says. "That data set comes back to pre-training." The four scaling laws don't compete. They feed each other. Agentic systems produce data, which feeds pre-training, which smartens the base model, which enables better agents, which produce more data. A flywheel that compounds forever. The companies pricing in three scaling laws are mispricing the fourth. The fourth eats the other three for lunch. P.S. Pull the thread on any story like this and you'll find the hidden incentive at the other end. As Munger said: "Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome." So I wrote a short book on how to spot them and design your own. Comment "INCENTIVES" and I'll send you the details. If you're new here, follow GeniusThinking for content on the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. — Jensen Huang ( NVIDIA ), NVIDIA CEO, on Lex Fridman's ( Lex Fridman ) podcast

GeniusThinking

92,806 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🇨🇳 Chinese tourism is 95% domestic: this means most of the tourists you see in China are not foreigners but just other Chinese Even if we'd visit the most tourist places in China, we'd see maybe 1 Westerner (if we're lucky) vs. 10,000 Chinese Which honestly makes it a more fun place to visit to Maybe the most fun place I visited since I became a digital nomad in 2013 I thought about WHY I liked this so much, and I think one of the reasons traveling for me as a digital nomad starting 10+ years ago was so magical, was because it was NEW and there was barely anyone doing it, like there'd be 20 other digital nomads in Chiang Mai You felt a lot like Ernest Hemmingway, traveling to far away countries, interacting with people and observing the differences in culture and learning from them But things have changed a bit. There's now 2x more people traveling in the world than 15 years ago (from 900 million to now 1.8 tourist trips per year). By 2035, that'll be 3x more Now that everyone can travel anywhere (and also bring their laptop), travel has boomed, and there's a lot less places where you're still the only foreigner visiting Even if you go to some remote non-tourist place, you're bound to run into another Dutch, German, Brit, Spanish or American traveler every 5 minutes China feels like you are the only one there, and due to geopolitics it's more isolated from the West than ever, and many Westerners are scared to visit (whether that's valid or not) This makes people also really super super nice, because you're the odd one out, and they know that, so they'll do everything to help you and be very pragmatic at that too. And they're not tired of tourists/foreigners yet, more like excited to see you (because there simply is barely any) This video is obviously a very tourist spot, but most of the non-touristy things you see in China are not crowded like this, actually more like very spacious and not busy, which also makes it a very comfortable place to visit, because other places have become so crowded with tourism and just general travel, that they're overcapacity, and it's not fun China is generally under capacity, and that makes it generally smooth to travel here (okay maybe except this tourist spot :D) This spot btw is the Hongya Cave famous for being built into the rocks and full of lights, it actually looks sick from inside too, imagine building a house in Minecraft into the rocks, very cool and full of food and shops inside the rocks (it's where I took the food video from below)

@levelsio

1,689,952 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 Alright, listen to me for a second. 🚨 The NEW version of Wayfinder, is the version of the game we needed from the start. It's pretty much unrecognizable from the model we saw months ago. ✅ Better performance, cleaner combat, better loot, better UI/UX, better sound design, you name it. 😖 Here's my problem: It could be too late. This reality really stings, because this is the game I feel the team wanted to show us from the very beginning. I truly hope their marketing team is able to pull it out the bag here and get big streamers playing it, and platforms promoting it with ads. 😈 If you're a Borderlands fan, this is the update you've been waiting for. Loot drops with rarities, levels, randomized stats, and there is TONS of transmog variety including player housing, mounts, weapon dyes, emotes, sprays & more. 🤖 If you're a Destiny fan, the worlds feel more open, with included patrols, and mini lost sector like basements with loot hidden amongst enemies/puzzles. 👹 New difficulty levels feel fun and challenging meaning the game is accessible to quite literally any skill level. There's now ARMOR SETS too, providing even more customization for your character as you level through the reworked skill trees, which now work like those seen in games such as POE/Diablo. 💸 And the best part? Zero MTX. Everything which was previously paid, is now a free addition and earned in game. I'm sure I'll get called a mega shill 🤓 for this post, but that comes with the FAME 😎 Seriously, check this game out when it launches. The team at Wayfinder have done a great job all around with this one.

EpicNNG

30,590 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

👼🏼👹 Pasulka: It Could Be Angels and Demons 👹👼🏼 This segment was really good. Excellent job, Diana! Force dwpasulka (DP) to make a bet on what the phenomenon represents, and she'd say... DP: "It's a variety of things." Ross Douthat (RD): "It's more than one thing?" DP: "It appears to be." RD: "Okay. Give me two examples of what that thing is. It's a variety, just two. Two different things. What is it?" DP: "It appears to be a perennial thing (lasting or existing for a long or apparently infinite time). So there appears to be something that interfaces with humans, and has been identified in the various traditional religions." RD: "Identified as what?" DP: "Well, I'm not going to name it, because in some traditional religions it's named in different ways. So it could be bodhisattvas, angels, demons, things like that." (A Bodhisattvas is, "a being that compassionately refrains from entering nirvana in order to save others and is worshipped as a deity in Mahayana Buddhism." ~Merriam-Webster) RD: "No, that's good. So it is intermediate intelligences between God and human beings, some of whom have our best interests at heart and some of whom don't?" DP: "And those different religious traditions have protocols for dealing with these." RD: "But that was a yes? You agree. That's part of what you think it is?" DP: "I think some of the phenomena is that, not all of it. Then there appears to be some type of technology that is either, in my opinion - this is the truth serum, in my opinion - either is ours, or if it's not ours, it's amazing." RD: "So in that theory, you would have a kind of loop of, on the one hand, authentic experiences that map onto the great religious traditions, and at the same time, some kind of government cover up or secrecy around remarkable technologies that we aren't aware of. Are those two things linked, or is it just a marriage of convenience, then? That the government is happy that people have these kind of supernatural experiences because it makes it easier to cover up the amazing technology?" DP: "Yeah, that's the question I ask myself. I don't know if they're linked (laughs)." (I suspect that they're linked. At this point in time, my leading theory is that what we're experiencing is what people in ancient times referred to as Angels, Demons, Jinn, etc., but it has nothing to do with evil, which is a human label. I just think it's part of the natural, non-physical world that we usually can't perceive. And some of it may be helpful to humans and some of it is harmful. Seems like the harmful is more prevalent. Either we just get in the way and it doesn't care if we get hurt, or us getting hurt is somehow beneficial to it. Like, we're a resource somehow. Just like how we see cows, pigs and chickens. And I think it may have the ability to create what looks like technology. Materialize and dematerialize "stuff." And also, we may have our own tech that we back engineered from "their" tech or developed on our own. Just opinions.) RD: "All right, so last question, because you have been trying to pull me away from the government and back towards the personal experiences and so on. What can, you know, nice secular readers of The New York Times who have been baffled by this conversation (laughs), let's say, take away from the personal side of it, the direct encounters that people report having?" DP: "Okay. So I think what's really important is that most of us grew up with and were educated within this worldview, and I call it the Thomas-Jefferson worldview. And Thomas Jefferson didn't believe that Jesus was divine. He believed that Jesus was a really good person. And he even went so far as to rewrite the New Testament, and he took out all the references to miracles and all the things that, you know, all the references to angels and demons and exorcisms and healings and things like that. And there was the Jeffersonian Bible, okay? "So, I would say that, for me, what these experiences did was it... I was a, you know, I had a Jeffersonian worldview. I was a secular Catholic, okay? What these these experiences did was they jolted me out of that worldview and into the Shakespearean worldview. Where, you know, there are things that we don't understand, and why don't we, you know, understand that we don't understand them? Instead of just doing like the Wall Street Journal did, and just say 'No, nothing to see here.' Well, the world and the cosmos is a really beautiful place with a lot of mystery. So that's what I would suggest." (Well said, and I appreciate the shot at the WSJ.) RD: "Okay, I endorse that take very strongly. I'm gonna give you one more chance to tell me who it was who told you they had seen an alien spacecraft and where? Because, you know, it's the New York Times. It's an audience of at least dozens, if not millions. Don't you want to be the person who blew the lid off, you know, the secret government conspiracy, Diana?" DP: "No, I don't aspire to that." (Both laugh)

Joe Murgia

23,954 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr