Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Alright. So when Ronald Comes back within a week, Here is my Atlanta Braves Lineup 1. DH Ronald Acuna JR 2. SS Tate Southisene 3. C dRAKE BaldHIM 4. 1B Matt Olson 5. 2b Ozhaino Jurdy Jiandro Albies 6. LF Eric Hartman 7. 3B Austin Riley 8. RF AJ...

72,510 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

My personal top 20 OF prospects! 1. Walker Jenkins, MIN, AA, CF, 20 2. Edward Florentino, PIT, A, RF, 18 🎦 3. Eduardo Quintero, LAD, A, CF, 19 4. Lazaro Montes, SEA, A+, RF, 20 5. Max Clark, DET, A+, CF, 20 6. Spencer Jones, NYY, AAA, CF, 24 7. Zyhir Hope, LAD, A+, RF, 20 8. Owen Caissie, CHC, AAA, RF, 22 9. Emmanuel Rodriguez, MIN, AAA, CF, 22 10. Josue De Paula, LAD, A+, LF, 20 11. Justin Crawford, PHI, AAA, CF, 21 12. Mike Sirota, LAD, A+, CF, 22 13. Carson Benge, NYM, AA, CF, 22 14. Héctor Rodriguez, CIN, AAA, LF 21 15. Jhostynxon Garcia, BOS, AAA, CF, 22 16. Gabriel Gonzalez, MIN, AA, LF, 21 17. Braylon Payne, MIL, A, CF, 18 18. Theo Gillen, TBR, A, CF, 19 19. Nate George, BAL, A, CF, 19 20. A.J. Ewing, NYM A+, CF, 20 Other outfielders to know! Carlos Gutierrez, SFG Robert Calaz, COL Juneiker Caceres, CLE Braden Montgomery, CHW Slade Caldwell, ARI Chase DeLauter, CLE Jonny Farmelo, SEA Yeremi Cabrera, TEX Robert Arias, CLE Juan Ortuno, MIL Rece Hinds, CIN Dylan Beavers, BAL Edward Lantigua, NYM Andrew Salas, MIA Jaison Chourio, CLE Cole Carrigg, COL Ryan Waldschmidt, ARI Alfonsin Rosario, CLE Joseph Sullivan, HOU Owen Carey, ATL Nelson Rada, LAA Asbel Gonzalez, KCR Elis Cuevas, BAL Aidan Smith, TBR Jose Anderson, MIL Carson Benge, NYM Brailer Guerrero, TBR Henry Bolte, OAK Hayden Alvarez, LAA Notes: -Non-debuted only -LOADED position -I meant to relist Condon as a 1B this month but missed him. He would rank #6 at 1B and #13 here. -I continue to be high on Jenkins as I think there is more power there, question how much injuries have sapped it, and applaud him for his effectiveness despite that. Am I wrong? Tell me why! 👇

Ross Jensen

49,437 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) by hand ✍️ ~ 9 steps walkthrough below The Gen in GenAI came from this landmark paper by Ian Goodfellow et al., 12 years ago. The paper showed that a neural network can not only classify but also turn upside down to generate realistic looking images. The secret? We pit two of them against each other: a Generator turns noise into fake data, and a Discriminator learns to tell fake from real, pushing the Generator to keep doing better. One runs upside down, the other right way up. I drew and calculated one entirely by hand. Goal: generate realistic 4D data out of 2D noise, filling in every cell yourself. = 1. Given = Four noise vectors in 2D, and four real data vectors in 4D. = 2. Generator, first layer = Let us multiply the noise by weights and biases to get new features. = 3. ReLU = We apply the activation, and -1 and -2 are crossed out and set to 0. = 4. Generator, second layer = Let us multiply again. ReLU applies here too, but every value is already positive, so nothing changes. What comes out is the fake data F, made by a two-layer generator out of nothing but noise. = 5. Discriminator, first layer = We feed it both, the four fakes and the four real vectors, through the same weights. It never learns which is which from the layout, only from the numbers. = 6. Discriminator, second layer = Let us reduce each data vector to a single feature Z. Eight vectors in, eight numbers out. = 7. Sigmoid = We turn each Z into a probability Y. A 1 means the discriminator is certain the data is real, a 0 means certain it is fake. = 8. Training the Discriminator = Let us take the gradients as Y minus YD, where YD is what the discriminator should have said: 0 for the four fakes, 1 for the four real. Why so simple? Because pairing sigmoid with binary cross entropy loss makes the math collapse to exactly this subtraction. Its loss uses both halves of the page. = 9. Training the Generator = We do it again, as Y minus YG, and YG is [1, 1, 1, 1]: the generator wants the discriminator to call every fake real. Same predictions, different target, opposite goal. Its loss uses only the fakes. The outputs: Fake data F = [1, 2, 3, 1], [1, 1, 2, 1], [2, 2, 4, 2], [1, 0, 1, 1] Predictions on fakes = [.7, .5, .9, .3] Predictions on real = [.7, .9, .9, 1] Discriminator gradients = [.7, .5, .9, .3] and [-.3, -.1, -.1, 0] Generator gradients = [-.3, -.5, -.1, -.7] The takeaway: the adversarial part is one subtraction done twice. The same eight predictions, scored against two opposite targets, send one set of gradients back through the blue weights and another back through the green ones. 💾 Save this post!

Tom Yeh

16,652 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

My app just hit $7.8k/m in revenue. This is how I'm running ads for mobile apps. To hit 10k/m before I quit my job & fly to Vietnam 🇻🇳 Part One: Apple Ads (First $1k/m). • Repeated this a lot so to summarise: 1. $100 free ad credits, ez mode. 2. Run strict keywords on competitor names. 3. Split into tiers for countries & scale the max bid. 4. Use RevenueCat or Superwall for attribution. 5. Give ad spend & transactions to claude: find winners. 6. Measure the onboarding: tighten funnel. 7. Daily budget can be low at first, like $20. 8. The max bid is the important variable here. 9. This will get you to $1k/m. Part Two: TikSl0p Ads ($1k to $10k) • This is much harder to make profit. • But when you do, it's exponential. • Read Open Book's guide on this first. 1. Make ~6 formats, ~12 creatives. 2. Leave campaign targeting super broad. 3. I do $70/day of campaign budget spend. 4. No demographic or interest settings. 5. Let the algorithm find your perfect user. 6. Give each creative $50 of ad spend. 7. After $50, if (close to) profitable then scale. 8. If no profit, then stop the posts. 9. Use realised LTV to begin with. 10. Simple: revenue / paid customers. 11. 400 IQ chad: aim for profit on initial transaction. 12. Ask Rico for unrealised LTV. Can be hard to calculate. 13. Expect to burn a few hundred $$ to find profit. Notes: If you none of your creatives are profitable, then go back to the drawing board and try again. You're taking $50 gambles each time. When you find a winner, it'll repay the initial investments 100x! This is a game of pain tolerance. You need to be able to stomach losing hundreds of $$$ without seeing any returns. Part Three: Scaling. 1. If you're consistently getting > 2x ROAS. 2. Up your campaign budget by 15%. 3. Do NOT increase more than 30%. 4. Otherwise I will be very very cross with you. 5. You'll kill performance. 6. Performance can be volatile. • Measure ROAS over weeks, not days Notes: When you've found a winning creative, create multiple variations of it. We're talking 100 different kinds. I'm being lazy and need to do this more!! Part Four: Experimental Ad Spend ($10k +). • This is the next level: I've gone 0-1. • I've not seen much sauce on X about scaling past this. • So, this is where I'm at now. I'll share it with all of you. My current position is: 1. Trying out other platforms: Meta, IG, etc 2. Continue reinvesting the profits from previous ads. 3. I'm trying multiple new avenues right now: • Paid influencers, UGC, slideshowmaxxing, etc. Keep pushing, we're all gonna win.

Frederick James

16,140 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Akademiks x Top 5: Breakdown of the Drake Fallout Context: Akademiks taps in with Toronto rapper Top 5 about his sudden issues with Drake, Pressa, OVO, and why he posted Kendrick Lamar. 1. Why Top 5 Is Upset •Drake showed love to Pressa’s new album. •Presa allegedly posted Top 5’s opps’ music. •Top 5 responded by posting Kendrick Lamar. •Top 5 calls this “disloyalty,” claiming he’s always been vocal defending Drake online. 2. The Pressa Situation Top 5 says: •He and Pressa are no longer cool. •Claims they fell out after discovering things he didn’t like about Pressa. •Says Pressa posted his opps music and has been dissing his hood. Akademiks pushes back on some claims, trying to clarify. 3. Wireless Festival Drama Top 5 alleges: •Pressa was scheduled to perform at Wireless Festival. •He told Drake not to let Pressa perform if he (Top 5) wasn’t included. •Claims Drake pulled Pressa from the lineup because of this. Akademiks questions the timeline but lets Top 5 continue. 4. The Leaked Drake x Pressa Song Top 5: •Says the Drake Pressa collab “National Treasure” leaked. •Believes Pressa leaked it. •Denies having the files or leaking anything. 5. The Root of His Issue With Drake Top 5 says: •He reached out to Drake about Pressa dissing him. •Drake responded saying he’s trying to make Toronto look good. •Top 5 felt unheard and got emotional: •“I’m the one who would ride for you.” •“Don’t post anyone dissing me.” Akademiks warns him not to say things publicly he’ll regret. 6. Wack 100 Joins the Call Wack 100 steps in: •Tells Top 5 he can’t expect Drake to follow street rules. •Tries to calm the situation and warn him about online trolling. •Tension sparks briefly before Top 5 hangs up on Wack. Blueface pops in briefly as well. 7. Akademiks Attempts Peace •Reminds Top 5 he’s loved by OVO. •Tells him Drake deleted the post already. •Encourages him to fix things offline. Top 5 agrees to squash the situation: •“We’re going to talk.” •“It’s an OVO ting.” •“Good music, not personal.” 8. Resolution Top 5 ends the call saying he has a date and will reconnect later. Akademiks: •“I got to squash some beefs out here. It’s an OVO thing.” 💭 My Opinion: Top 5 is being childish and tweaking… How you mad at the same man who helped get you free, made you relevant, and helped you get money all because he won’t jump into your beef? Posting a track calling Drake a pedophile with his opp is insane. That’s not loyalty… that’s snake behavior. Drake better not have him around anymore. Some moves you just don’t come back from.

Cousin Tino ™️

33,294 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

NEW: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary declares the U.S. has sunk to the level of a banana republic, warns of a financial "exodus." The comments by O'Leary were made in a piece with the Daily Mail. Here is what he said: 1. "The American brand has been dragged through the mud, sunk to the level of a banana republic where rulers take their political enemies out to the jungle to disappear." 2. "This great nation now stands diminished in the eyes of international investors. And the economic consequences for ordinary Americans could be dire." 3. Powerful business owners are closely watching the Trump persecution, knowing "they too could stand trial on purely political grounds." 4. O'Leary is losing sleep over the verdict, considering moving his money: "I, like so many others with sizeable investments, managed just two hours sleep Thursday night. For now I have to seriously consider: Do I move my money?" 5. "The trial has wounded New York's once sterling reputation as the safest and most attractive finance capital of the world." 6. The exodus is coming: "High-earners and their families are moving, too – from the likes of New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts to Texas, Florida, Tennessee and other low-tax havens." 7. O'Leary has faith Trump's verdict will make its way to the Supreme Court. 8. A final message of hope: "Once this travesty is correctly checked and this corrupt prosecution scrutinized, investors will feel less spooked." "The US is still the No.1 economy on Earth. It is still the place where most capital comes to invest. Let's hope that doesn't change."

Collin Rugg

2,600,424 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A Harvard professor asked 1 question 4 different ways - and got 4 contradicting answers His name is Michael Sandel. He teaches Justice. He opens the entire course with a hypothetical that takes 30 seconds to state and takes the rest of the hour to unravel. His entire framework fits on a napkin. You're driving a trolley. The brakes fail. 5 workers are on the track ahead. A side track has 1 worker. You can steer. Ask a room of students what they'd do, and the vast majority say the same thing: turn. Better 1 dies than 5. Here is where it falls apart. Change nothing about the math. Change only the mechanism. Now you're standing on a bridge, watching the same runaway trolley bear down on the same 5 workers. Next to you stands a heavy man. Push him off the bridge, his body stops the trolley, 5 live and 1 dies - the exact same trade as before. Almost nobody pushes him. Same numbers. Same outcome. Completely different answer. Sandel doesn't tell the room they're wrong. He asks them to explain the difference, and the room can't agree on one. 1 student argues the fat man never chose to be involved, unlike the worker already standing on the side track - except the worker never chose it either. Another argues that steering a wheel is a "split-second" reaction while pushing a man is deliberate murder - except both require an active, conscious decision to kill 1 person you weren't otherwise going to kill. Every explanation the room offers gets challenged by another student within seconds. Then Sandel tightens the trap further. You're an ER doctor. 5 patients need moderate care, 1 needs intensive care, you can't save all 6. Nearly everyone chooses the 5 - consistent with the trolley. Then: you're a transplant surgeon. 5 patients need 5 different organs. A healthy stranger naps in the next room. You could harvest his organs and save all 5. Almost nobody says yes. Same math, every single time. 1 life against 5. The answer keeps flipping, and the room keeps struggling to explain why. Sandel closes the lecture with a real case from 1884 - the shipwreck of the Mignonette. 4 sailors adrift with no food or water. After 19 days, the captain killed the weakest of them, a 17-year-old crew member, so the other 3 could survive by eating his body. All 3 survivors were rescued. 2 of them stood trial for murder back in England. The room splits immediately. Does it matter that the boy had no family waiting, while the others had wives and children? Is killing 1 to save 3 different in a lifeboat than on a bridge? Is murder wrong regardless of the outcome it produces, or only wrong when the math doesn't justify it? Here is what the lecture is really about. Sandel isn't teaching students the right answer to any of these cases. He's showing them that their own moral intuitions contradict each other within the same hour, under questioning they can't escape - and that noticing the contradiction is the actual beginning of moral philosophy. He teaches this to students who will spend careers making decisions that quietly involve this exact tradeoff - policy, medicine, law, business. Half of them will never examine the framework they're using. The other half will remember the moment their own logic broke in front of a room of strangers. The lecture is free. Harvard has taught it publicly for decades. The barrier was never access. The barrier is sitting with the contradiction long enough to admit you don't actually have a consistent principle - you have a set of feelings that change depending on how the question is asked. The napkin costs nothing. Realizing your moral intuitions contradict each other is the entire edge.

vladuah

29,548 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Port Harcourt Refinery: My short story: -: You will recall that I shared the completion date of the refinery before. I chopped better insults. So, let me go and verify ooo. 1: We visited Port Harcourt Refinery this week to find out whether the Refinery don shut down as claimed by Punch Newspapers 2: The way PH refinery is built, you cannot be at the gate or in the building to ascertain whether it is operational or not. You have to visit another gate where you will be processed before allowing you to enter. 3: Precaution is important: You must have a safety shoes on. You must drop your phone to avoid accidents. Then, trucks that are loading have a particular gate they will exist from. 4: The Punch Journalist must have enjoyed himself at a nearby garden in Eleme with Pepper soup and bole. He does not know that tankers will not pass the main entrance. 5: anyway, the refinery is operational. Commendation to the past FG not Buhari and FG not Tinubu for providing leadership. 6: the workers in PH refinery are committed to sustain this tempo. They were not happy about this report. Thousands are working there. They would have reported it via their WhatsApp that the leadership of NNPC Limited were misleading Nigerians. Let us support them. 7: it is clear that the leadership of NNPC Limited under Mele Kyari, OFR worked so hard to deliver this old 60,000bpd refinery. 8: Energy sufficiency is a National Security. We must work hard to produce at home to deliver a better Nigeria. Better late than never. Engineering is not buying TV at LG shop. 9: Thanks to those who insulted me. You can see that it is working. Nigeria wins NNPCUnderKyari MS Ingawa @AmirSaadR Abba Audu Benisheikh Gonet001 Eccakyky IGBOMINA Michael Chibuzo® National Orientation Agency, Nigeria Nononsense Nyenwe Eli Iwhuruohna BHA A. Ayofe 10: Frame 3 and 4 are crude heater with fire. That place is so so so so hot like 600 degrees Celsius. Ministry of Petroleum Resources, Nigeria SEN. HEINEKEN LOKPOBIRI Ph.D. Ekperikpe Ekpo HMPR (Gas) Mr Denis Lagos/Benue It's SHOSHANA Farmer Akin Alabi® ‎أَبُو إِيمَان Better Kaduna🌆 Boss Mustapha Z. Asafa Abdulwasii Abba Audu Benisheikh Lagos Landlord & Osun, Kwara Tenant🇳🇬 🇺🇬 🇬🇭 MR-LAI-ILORIN 🇳🇬 Femi Soneye Ojumo iree White Lion 🦁 TallJohn🌍 Wale Adedayo 🌍🔰 Wale S Akerele Jayjam

Woye

20,776 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"A few people on Capitol Hill recently got wind of this and asked Kirkpatrick for the names of who was sitting on this secret council. Kirkpatrick refused to tell them." ~Matt 💥Congress Alerted: Kirkpatrick Has Secret Board of Advisors Featuring Two Gatekeepers💥 If true, there's an easy fix: Fire Kirkpatrick and replace him with someone Lue Elizondo or Christopher K. Mellon trust. H/T: wow and Mike Colangelo Matt - The Good Trouble Show with Matt Ford: "Has anyone from AARO reached out to whistleblower David Grusch? The answer is 'no." No one from AARO, including its leader, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, has reached out to David Grusch, or his attorney, via any form of official communication. None. Zilch. Not an email, not a phone call, or even a message from a carrier pigeon. Absolutely nothing. It's crazy. "Instead, Kirkpatrick is going around Washington DC, or having his underlings do it, whispering that Grusch should visit him, in a way that's kind of reminiscent of that, you know, frankly, kind of shitty passive aggressive post on LinkedIn. So, think about it. One of the highest ranking former intelligence officials (Grusch) goes on national TV and testifies under oath to Congress about secret Pentagon UAP back-engineering programs, files whistleblower complaints, followed by dozens of other whistleblowers claiming the same thing. You have a former Pentagon program director (Dr. Jim Lacatski) on the record about super-secret legacy UAP programs. And Dr. Kirkpatrick doesn't bother to reach out to David Grusch, officially (laughs)? "I mean, you can't make this stuff up. It is pure incompetence, or is it something else? Is AARO, under Sean Kirkpatrick's leadership, intent on getting to the truth for both Congress and the American people? Can whistleblowers, Congress, and Americans trust AARO and its leadership? "Now, what I'm about to tell you is from a very high-ranking source. Very high-ranking, that has given us information that has always, always panned out. This information is significant, and, in my opinion, it demands a congressional investigation into AARO. So, everyone pay attention. "When AARO was established, Ronald Moultrie also established an advisory council called AAROEXEC, or AARO Executive Counsel, whose purpose was to provide oversight and guidance to AARO, and was headed by Ronald Moultrie himself. The existence of this advisory board...actually, it was nothing secret. Everybody knew about it on The Hill. Moultrie actually announced it in an official Pentagon memo that you can find on the internet. So Congress knew of its existence, and who sat on the council. There was nothing to hide." ~~~AAROEXEC Announced in This DoD Release~~~ The AARO Executive Council (AAROEXEC), led by Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence & Security (USD(I&S)) Ronald Moultrie, will provide oversight and direction to the AARO along these primary lines of effort: 1. Surveillance, Collection and Reporting 2. System Capabilities and Design 3. Intelligence Operations and Analysis 4. Mitigation and Defeat 5. Governance 6. Science and Technology ~~~End DoD Press Release Excerpt~~~ Matt: But, there has been something hidden from Congress. And here it is. When AARO was formed by Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, he assembled a separate, secret council of advisors. A few people on Capitol Hill recently got wind of this and asked Kirkpatrick for the names of who was sitting on this secret council. Kirkpatrick refused to tell them. Why? I'll tell you why. Because some of these unelected officials who sit on the super-secret advisory council are the actual gatekeepers of the Legacy UAP crash recovery and back engineering program. I mean, seriously, talk about the fox guide, guarding the henhouse. You cannot make this shit up. "And Dr. Kirkpatrick, sorry to break it to you, but these officials on Capitol Hill now have the list of names that are sitting on your little secret council. Congress and congressional staffers, this is really huge. It calls into question, what is going on AARO? Who is guiding it. And if you have one front-facing board that everyone knows about, but then you have something that's hidden from you and kept under wraps, and then you have at least two people that are are gatekeepers to the Legacy UAP crash retrieval and back engineering program, I mean, come on, you guys have to look into that. "And this also brings into into question whether we can trust Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick and AARO, whether whistleblowers can go to AARO and trust them. It's crazy." #ufos #ufoX #aliens #uap

Joe Murgia

92,223 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I think "follow your passion" is garbage advice. Here's why: I've started 80+ businesses. Entrepreneurship is my whole life. My hobby, my job, my family, all of it rolled into one. I am very passionate about all this, BUT... Most people don't know what their passion is. And the ones who think they do are usually wrong. Passion comes from the Latin word for suffering. It literally means suffering. So when someone tells you to follow your passion, what they should be saying is: "go find the thing you're willing to suffer for." Not the thing that feels amazing on a sunny Saturday when you have nowhere to be. Anyone can love that. I'm talking about the thing where you will eat crap for two years straight and keep showing up anyway. Where the bad days still feel better than a good day doing something else. Here's how to find it: 1/ Go to takeout .google .com right now. Export your YouTube watch history from the last 90 days. 2/ Drop it into ChatGPT and ask: "Show me the three obsessions hiding in here that I'd probably never want to admit to myself out loud." 3/ Then do the same thing with your Amazon order history. You can export a spreadsheet of every purchase you've ever made. 4/ Upload it and say: "Categorize my discretionary spending and tell me what I clearly care about based on where my money is actually going." 5/ Next, text five people who know you best and ask one question: "What do I not shut up about?" I promise the answers are going to show you a pattern. Three people will say some version of the same thing. That thing is pointing you at your obsession. 6/ Then think back to when you were 8 to 12 years old. Right before the world got its hands on you and told you what was useful and what was a waste of time. What did you do for hours that nobody had to ask you to do? There's almost a 0% chance that obsession completely went away. For me, it was setting traps and catching frogs and looking for animal tracks behind my house in Logan, Utah. That went dormant for decades but it's still there. Last thing, and this is what I really want you to remember here: 7/ Obsession isn't buried treasure you have to stumble across, It gets built. You start with a seed of interest. Then you get a little bit good at it. That feels great. So you do more. You get better. And somewhere in there, the interest turns into obsession. The passion follows the progress. It doesn't start the other way around. So stop asking yourself "what do I love?" Start asking "what am I willing to suffer for?" Find that and you found your obsession. And that's the only one that ever actually pays. --- Update: After filming this and buying the domain obsessionaudit .com (I couldnt help it), I vibecoded an actual "obsession audit" that helps you figure yours out. Totally free. check it out below.

Chris Koerner

19,092 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Who needs the Epstein files—the first 16 women to accuse Trump speak out. 👇 #1 Cathy Heller—"He took my hand, and grabbed me, and went for the lips." #2 Jill Harth—"And he just slipped his hand there, touching my private part." #3 Temple Taggart—"He turned to me and embraced me and gave me a kiss on the lips. And I remember being shocked, because I would have just thought to shake somebody's hand, but that was his first response." #4 Cassandra Searles—"He continually grabbed my ass and invited me to his hotel room." #5 Jessica Leeds—"It was a real shock when all of a sudden his hands were all over me. But it's when he started putting his hand up my skirt, and that was it. That was it." #6 Kristin Anderson—"The person on my right, who unbeknownst to me at that time was Donald Trump, put their hand up my skirt. He did touch my vagina through my underwear." #7 Lisa Boyne—"As the women walked across the table, Donald Trump would look up under their skirt and, you know, comment on whether they had underwear or didn't have underwear. I didn't want to have to walk across the table. I wanted to get out of there." #8 Karena Virginia—"Then his hand touched the right inside of my breast. I felt intimidated and I felt powerless." #9 Mindy McGillivray—"Melania was standing right next to him when he touched my butt. She also caught him at the first encounter that we had." #10 Rachel Crooks—"He kissed me directly on the mouth. It was so inappropriate. He thought I was so insignificant he could do that." #11 Natasha Stoynoff—"I don't really care if he finds me attractive or not. Apparently, he found me attractive enough 11 years ago. I think that he's saying there that only pretty women get assaulted." #12 Jessica Drake—"When we entered the room, he grabbed each of us tightly in a hug and kissed each one of us without asking permission. After that, I received another call from either Donald or a male calling on his behalf, offering me ten thousand dollars. His actions are a huge testament to his character, that of uncontrollable misogyny, entitlement, and being a sexual assault apologist." #13 Ninni Laaksonen—"He really grabbed my butt. Mr. Trump was a slimy man!" #14 Samantha Holvey—"I'm sitting there in my robe and having my makeup and hair done and everything, and he comes walking in, and I was just like, Oh my goodness, like what is he doing back here? I saw him walk into the dressing room. He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless, other girls were naked." #15 Tash Dixon—"He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on. Some girls were topless, and other girls were naked. Walking in when we're naked or half naked in a very physically vulnerable position." #16 Summer Zervos—"And he came to me and started kissing me open-mouthed as he was pulling me towards him. He then grabbed my shoulder and began kissing me again very aggressively and placed his hand on my breast. And I said, come on, man, get real. He repeated my words back to me. Get real. As he began thrusting his genitals." #DemVoice1 #wtpBLUE #DemsUnited
3:09

Sensitive content

Who needs the Epstein files—the first 16 women to accuse Trump speak out. 👇 #1 Cathy Heller—"He took my hand, and grabbed me, and went for the lips." #2 Jill Harth—"And he just slipped his hand there, touching my private part." #3 Temple Taggart—"He turned to me and embraced me and gave me a kiss on the lips. And I remember being shocked, because I would have just thought to shake somebody's hand, but that was his first response." #4 Cassandra Searles—"He continually grabbed my ass and invited me to his hotel room." #5 Jessica Leeds—"It was a real shock when all of a sudden his hands were all over me. But it's when he started putting his hand up my skirt, and that was it. That was it." #6 Kristin Anderson—"The person on my right, who unbeknownst to me at that time was Donald Trump, put their hand up my skirt. He did touch my vagina through my underwear." #7 Lisa Boyne—"As the women walked across the table, Donald Trump would look up under their skirt and, you know, comment on whether they had underwear or didn't have underwear. I didn't want to have to walk across the table. I wanted to get out of there." #8 Karena Virginia—"Then his hand touched the right inside of my breast. I felt intimidated and I felt powerless." #9 Mindy McGillivray—"Melania was standing right next to him when he touched my butt. She also caught him at the first encounter that we had." #10 Rachel Crooks—"He kissed me directly on the mouth. It was so inappropriate. He thought I was so insignificant he could do that." #11 Natasha Stoynoff—"I don't really care if he finds me attractive or not. Apparently, he found me attractive enough 11 years ago. I think that he's saying there that only pretty women get assaulted." #12 Jessica Drake—"When we entered the room, he grabbed each of us tightly in a hug and kissed each one of us without asking permission. After that, I received another call from either Donald or a male calling on his behalf, offering me ten thousand dollars. His actions are a huge testament to his character, that of uncontrollable misogyny, entitlement, and being a sexual assault apologist." #13 Ninni Laaksonen—"He really grabbed my butt. Mr. Trump was a slimy man!" #14 Samantha Holvey—"I'm sitting there in my robe and having my makeup and hair done and everything, and he comes walking in, and I was just like, Oh my goodness, like what is he doing back here? I saw him walk into the dressing room. He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless, other girls were naked." #15 Tash Dixon—"He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on. Some girls were topless, and other girls were naked. Walking in when we're naked or half naked in a very physically vulnerable position." #16 Summer Zervos—"And he came to me and started kissing me open-mouthed as he was pulling me towards him. He then grabbed my shoulder and began kissing me again very aggressively and placed his hand on my breast. And I said, come on, man, get real. He repeated my words back to me. Get real. As he began thrusting his genitals." #DemVoice1 #wtpBLUE #DemsUnited

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

606,823 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The original Epstein list—the first 16 women to accuse Trump speak out. 👇 #1 Cathy Heller—"He took my hand, grabbed me, and went for the lips." #2 Jill Harth—"And he just slipped his hand there, touching my private part." #3 Temple Taggart—"He turned to me and embraced me and gave me a kiss on the lips. And I remember being shocked, because I would have just thought to shake somebody's hand, but that was his first response." #4 Cassandra Searles—"He continually grabbed my ass and invited me to his hotel room." #5 Jessica Leeds—"It was a real shock when all of a sudden his hands were all over me. But it's when he started putting his hand up my skirt, and that was it. That was it." #6 Kristin Anderson—"The person on my right, who unbeknownst to me at that time was Donald Trump, put their hand up my skirt. He did touch my vagina through my underwear." #7 Lisa Boyne—"As the women walked across the table, Donald Trump would look up under their skirt and, you know, comment on whether they had underwear or didn't have underwear. I didn't want to have to walk across the table. I wanted to get out of there." #8 Karena Virginia—"Then his hand touched the right inside of my breast. I felt intimidated and I felt powerless." #9 Mindy McGillivray—"Melania was standing right next to him when he touched my butt. She also caught him at the first encounter that we had." #10 Rachel Crooks—"He kissed me directly on the mouth. It was so inappropriate. He thought I was so insignificant he could do that." #11 Natasha Stoynoff—"I don't really care if he finds me attractive or not. Apparently, he found me attractive enough 11 years ago. I think that he's saying there that only pretty women get assaulted." #12 Jessica Drake—"When we entered the room, he grabbed each of us tightly in a hug and kissed each one of us without asking permission. After that, I received another call from either Donald or a male calling on his behalf, offering me ten thousand dollars. His actions are a huge testament to his character, that of uncontrollable misogyny, entitlement, and being a sexual assault apologist." #13 Ninni Laaksonen—"He really grabbed my butt. Mr. Trump was a slimy man!" #14 Samantha Holvey—"I'm sitting there in my robe and having my makeup and hair done and everything, and he comes walking in, and I was just like, Oh my goodness, like what is he doing back here? I saw him walk into the dressing room. He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless, and other girls were naked." #15 Tash Dixon—"He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on. Some girls were topless, and other girls were naked. Walking in when we're naked or half naked in a very physically vulnerable position." #16 Summer Zervos—"And he came to me and started kissing me open-mouthed as he was pulling me towards him. He then grabbed my shoulder and began kissing me again, very aggressively, and placed his hand on my breast. And I said, 'Come on, man, get real.' He repeated my words back to me, 'Get real,' As he began thrusting his genitals." #DemsUnited
3:11

Sensitive content

The original Epstein list—the first 16 women to accuse Trump speak out. 👇 #1 Cathy Heller—"He took my hand, grabbed me, and went for the lips." #2 Jill Harth—"And he just slipped his hand there, touching my private part." #3 Temple Taggart—"He turned to me and embraced me and gave me a kiss on the lips. And I remember being shocked, because I would have just thought to shake somebody's hand, but that was his first response." #4 Cassandra Searles—"He continually grabbed my ass and invited me to his hotel room." #5 Jessica Leeds—"It was a real shock when all of a sudden his hands were all over me. But it's when he started putting his hand up my skirt, and that was it. That was it." #6 Kristin Anderson—"The person on my right, who unbeknownst to me at that time was Donald Trump, put their hand up my skirt. He did touch my vagina through my underwear." #7 Lisa Boyne—"As the women walked across the table, Donald Trump would look up under their skirt and, you know, comment on whether they had underwear or didn't have underwear. I didn't want to have to walk across the table. I wanted to get out of there." #8 Karena Virginia—"Then his hand touched the right inside of my breast. I felt intimidated and I felt powerless." #9 Mindy McGillivray—"Melania was standing right next to him when he touched my butt. She also caught him at the first encounter that we had." #10 Rachel Crooks—"He kissed me directly on the mouth. It was so inappropriate. He thought I was so insignificant he could do that." #11 Natasha Stoynoff—"I don't really care if he finds me attractive or not. Apparently, he found me attractive enough 11 years ago. I think that he's saying there that only pretty women get assaulted." #12 Jessica Drake—"When we entered the room, he grabbed each of us tightly in a hug and kissed each one of us without asking permission. After that, I received another call from either Donald or a male calling on his behalf, offering me ten thousand dollars. His actions are a huge testament to his character, that of uncontrollable misogyny, entitlement, and being a sexual assault apologist." #13 Ninni Laaksonen—"He really grabbed my butt. Mr. Trump was a slimy man!" #14 Samantha Holvey—"I'm sitting there in my robe and having my makeup and hair done and everything, and he comes walking in, and I was just like, Oh my goodness, like what is he doing back here? I saw him walk into the dressing room. He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on or any sort of clothing or anything. Some girls were topless, and other girls were naked." #15 Tash Dixon—"He just came strolling right in. There was no second to put a robe on. Some girls were topless, and other girls were naked. Walking in when we're naked or half naked in a very physically vulnerable position." #16 Summer Zervos—"And he came to me and started kissing me open-mouthed as he was pulling me towards him. He then grabbed my shoulder and began kissing me again, very aggressively, and placed his hand on my breast. And I said, 'Come on, man, get real.' He repeated my words back to me, 'Get real,' As he began thrusting his genitals." #DemsUnited

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

594,448 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten