Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Although her understanding isn’t perfect, she understands Romans 9 light years ahead of Leighton Flowers. She could probably beat him in a debate on it right now. This just goes to show that understanding Romans 9 is not that hard. Just an honest reading of the text, and you... show more

5 Solas

45,731 subscribers

90,103 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

What really makes this weird to me is that I assumed Carol just sounds like that on the phone, but then she calls Kris at the end of the weird route and not only does she have her normal text voice but she has a normal dialogue box as well. Does she change her voice?

What really makes this weird to me is that I assumed Carol just sounds like that on the phone, but then she calls Kris at the end of the weird route and not only does she have her normal text voice but she has a normal dialogue box as well. Does she change her voice?

alex !!! 💛🩷

111,512 views • 11 months ago

This is Aly. She just learned about capitalism. Certainly not a perfect system, but if that is what it takes to put chippies on the table, she understands. 13/10

This is Aly. She just learned about capitalism. Certainly not a perfect system, but if that is what it takes to put chippies on the table, she understands. 13/10

WeRateDogs

317,312 views • 4 months ago

Literacy learning begins early. Check out this sweet little one as she “reads” a board book independently in her crib. Her language is not yet conventional. But consider all the knowledge she’s putting on display. First, she knows that books contain meaning and that they can be read aloud - just like her parents do with her. She’s got an understanding (even if her book is upside down) that as stories progress one turns the pages from left to right. And, interestingly, she may even recognize that books catering to her age range often include simple, repetitive text. (Listen as she vocalizes a similar pattern over and over.) Is she interacting with the text itself? Not yet. And that’s just fine. But at well under a year of age, she’s already absorbed an impressive amount about books and how they work. Read with your baby every day. You’ll be amazed by the benefits. This literate little one was shared to IG by last1knights.

Literacy learning begins early. Check out this sweet little one as she “reads” a board book independently in her crib. Her language is not yet conventional. But consider all the knowledge she’s putting on display. First, she knows that books contain meaning and that they can be read aloud - just like her parents do with her. She’s got an understanding (even if her book is upside down) that as stories progress one turns the pages from left to right. And, interestingly, she may even recognize that books catering to her age range often include simple, repetitive text. (Listen as she vocalizes a similar pattern over and over.) Is she interacting with the text itself? Not yet. And that’s just fine. But at well under a year of age, she’s already absorbed an impressive amount about books and how they work. Read with your baby every day. You’ll be amazed by the benefits. This literate little one was shared to IG by last1knights.

Dan Wuori

193,227 views • 1 year ago

This woman is locked out of her home, she goes to an enclosed back door and tries to break the door to get it. Her kids aren’t home but her dog is in their whining and panicking. She goes to the garage and finds a hammer. She decides that since she lives in the middle of no where, there isn’t a locksmith that can help her now, she’s going to have to break the door. As she’s hitting the wooden door, it makes weird noises like broken glass in a box being shuffled around. She eventually breaks the door enough to get in, but this raises more questions than she can answer. Like first of all, why would the door be filled with glass and why hasn’t she noticed that before?

This woman is locked out of her home, she goes to an enclosed back door and tries to break the door to get it. Her kids aren’t home but her dog is in their whining and panicking. She goes to the garage and finds a hammer. She decides that since she lives in the middle of no where, there isn’t a locksmith that can help her now, she’s going to have to break the door. As she’s hitting the wooden door, it makes weird noises like broken glass in a box being shuffled around. She eventually breaks the door enough to get in, but this raises more questions than she can answer. Like first of all, why would the door be filled with glass and why hasn’t she noticed that before?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,479,799 views • 2 months ago

Life and death are in the power of the tongue… In this case, the girlfriend has a right to see what she wants but as soon as The man just has a little fun and he’s condemned . This woman is literally oblivious to the damage that she has wrought.

Life and death are in the power of the tongue… In this case, the girlfriend has a right to see what she wants but as soon as The man just has a little fun and he’s condemned . This woman is literally oblivious to the damage that she has wrought.

A Gene Robinson

97,034 views • 1 year ago

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

So the discourse around this Dave Ramsey clip is so mixed up that I’ve just decided to upload the whole thing. In the full context of the call, the caller makes it perfectly obvious that: 1. She has been with this man, whom she is now living with, for six years. 2. She is a nurse and can make her own money. 3. She has been out of school for two years, and in that time she has paid off $70,000 of the debt. In the course of the call, Dave never suggests that this man should have to pay for that debt. Indeed, he actively suggests that she leave him, which guarantees he will not pay for the debt. Dave also all but says that, because of her career choice, the caller will be able to pay for the debt on her own, even if she has to take extra hours. All Dave is saying—and this should have been obvious from the original clip—is that the two are not aligned on money and debt at all. It is also clear that Dave thinks the man is stringing her along, which he is. So they simply should not be married at all, because this is a fundamental failure in the relationship. I myself would add that, at this late stage in the relationship, if you do not trust a woman financially, you should simply not be with that woman. And that is perfectly fine. But what you do not do is drag her along for six years when she obviously wants to get married, and then put another two or three years of financial hoops in front of her so that maybe you will propose. It is a waste of everybody’s time.

CTrefugees

135,314 views • 2 months ago

This broke me.. 😭 😭 Despite the loss she just endured… although she doesn’t understand, she places her trust in God, and wants everyone to know that God is so incredibly good. What an incredible woman of God…

This broke me.. 😭 😭 Despite the loss she just endured… although she doesn’t understand, she places her trust in God, and wants everyone to know that God is so incredibly good. What an incredible woman of God…

MJTruthUltra

4,221,562 views • 10 months ago

#Gh Joss talking makes sense and it’s more believable that she is spilling the beans. It’s more believable than her being this big classified WSB agent. She really had no understanding of what she was getting into it.

#Gh Joss talking makes sense and it’s more believable that she is spilling the beans. It’s more believable than her being this big classified WSB agent. She really had no understanding of what she was getting into it.

Paula ☕️☀️

21,347 views • 10 months ago

The woman filming just walked into the hotel at 6am wearing a jacket and looking like she just got off the street, she proceeded to walk into the breakfast area of this hotel. An employee she’s her and tries to identify her as a guest and asks her name and room number. The woman refuses to identify herself and refuses to cooperate. The employee then tells her she will have to call the police is she isn’t supposed to be here because it’s only for guests. The woman is hinting that she is supposed to be here and is only being stopped because of color, and sits there to see if the employee verifies if everyone else is supposed to be there as well. This escalates into a call to the police, while it does look like it’s possible she walked in for breakfast, is it likely she’s even a guest checked in at the hotel?

The woman filming just walked into the hotel at 6am wearing a jacket and looking like she just got off the street, she proceeded to walk into the breakfast area of this hotel. An employee she’s her and tries to identify her as a guest and asks her name and room number. The woman refuses to identify herself and refuses to cooperate. The employee then tells her she will have to call the police is she isn’t supposed to be here because it’s only for guests. The woman is hinting that she is supposed to be here and is only being stopped because of color, and sits there to see if the employee verifies if everyone else is supposed to be there as well. This escalates into a call to the police, while it does look like it’s possible she walked in for breakfast, is it likely she’s even a guest checked in at the hotel?

Ashlar

418,835 views • 3 months ago

The woman filming just walked into the hotel at 6am wearing a jacket and looking like she just got off the street, she proceeded to walk into the breakfast area of this hotel. An employee she’s her and tries to identify her as a guest and asks her name and room number. The woman refuses to identify herself and refuses to cooperate. The employee then tells her she will have to call the police is she isn’t supposed to be here because it’s only for guests. The woman is hinting that she is supposed to be here and is only being stopped because of color, and sits there to see if the employee verifies if everyone else is supposed to be there as well. This escalates into a call to the police, while it does look like it’s possible she walked in for breakfast, is it likely she’s even a guest checked in at the hotel?

The woman filming just walked into the hotel at 6am wearing a jacket and looking like she just got off the street, she proceeded to walk into the breakfast area of this hotel. An employee she’s her and tries to identify her as a guest and asks her name and room number. The woman refuses to identify herself and refuses to cooperate. The employee then tells her she will have to call the police is she isn’t supposed to be here because it’s only for guests. The woman is hinting that she is supposed to be here and is only being stopped because of color, and sits there to see if the employee verifies if everyone else is supposed to be there as well. This escalates into a call to the police, while it does look like it’s possible she walked in for breakfast, is it likely she’s even a guest checked in at the hotel?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

572,926 views • 4 months ago

Now, watch this video again! This time, listen to what she is saying. Some people were programmed into believing this video is just a funny clip. Listen to her and make sense of what she was saying. There is the truth about the So-called Boko Haram kidnapping of Chibok girls.

Now, watch this video again! This time, listen to what she is saying. Some people were programmed into believing this video is just a funny clip. Listen to her and make sense of what she was saying. There is the truth about the So-called Boko Haram kidnapping of Chibok girls.

𝑻𝑯𝑬 𝑮𝑬𝑵𝑬𝑹𝑨𝑳 𝑺𝑵𝑶𝑾 🇨🇮

1,092,944 views • 1 year ago

This is why Swinney sent McAllan. So she could play the misogyny card. Nobody was saying she shouldn’t be there because she is a woman. She is not the leader of the SNP. Playing that card makes me so angry as this is misrepresenting what misogyny is. She is a disgrace to women.

This is why Swinney sent McAllan. So she could play the misogyny card. Nobody was saying she shouldn’t be there because she is a woman. She is not the leader of the SNP. Playing that card makes me so angry as this is misrepresenting what misogyny is. She is a disgrace to women.

Jane Lax - MND - find a cure

51,268 views • 2 months ago

Daughter of woman detained by ICE: She is a mother to 3 children. She came to this country to give them a better life. She has been here for the last 30 years. She does not have a criminal record. She is the most lovely person you could ever meet. To the people that have met her, they know her to be the most respectful and kind person.

Daughter of woman detained by ICE: She is a mother to 3 children. She came to this country to give them a better life. She has been here for the last 30 years. She does not have a criminal record. She is the most lovely person you could ever meet. To the people that have met her, they know her to be the most respectful and kind person.

FactPost

96,396 views • 9 months ago

The loss of a good horse is heartbreaking. 💔 You never forget! What an awesome family to show up and give you love and support. That girl understands. She knows and she does forgive you. She’s not in pain anymore. And she will be waiting on the other side for you. ❤️

The loss of a good horse is heartbreaking. 💔 You never forget! What an awesome family to show up and give you love and support. That girl understands. She knows and she does forgive you. She’s not in pain anymore. And she will be waiting on the other side for you. ❤️

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

12,208 views • 5 months ago

Lila Rose keeps bringing this “Christian” matchmaker on her show to discuss proper dating techniques. Saying she’s a hot mess would be an understatement. As a preamble, this woman is in her 30s and is unmarried. I’m not sure if she’s divorced or not, but she is dating someone currently. I don’t know why she should be considered an expert when she can’t lock down a man herself. In the first clip, she encourages women to go on dates with men they’re not sexually attracted to, provided they aren’t just coffee dates. Even the rest of the panel was put off by this, as you’ll see. So, just like always, chopped men have to pay, just for the opportunity to talk to high value girlbosses. Secondly, she describes how Satan attacks one of her clients by sending very attractive (pagan) men to her. But if you listen carefully, it’s very clear this woman was solo traveling in Dubai and giving out her number (and probably more) to every hunk she could find. Otherwise, how was some rando Chad in Dubai able to contact this woman? CONCLUSION: Both clips indicate that this woman does not prioritize sexual purity with her clients, and this is a supposed Christian expert?! Until women reject this nonsense, men will continue to check out of the dating circus. It’s very hard for me to blame them…

Lila Rose keeps bringing this “Christian” matchmaker on her show to discuss proper dating techniques. Saying she’s a hot mess would be an understatement. As a preamble, this woman is in her 30s and is unmarried. I’m not sure if she’s divorced or not, but she is dating someone currently. I don’t know why she should be considered an expert when she can’t lock down a man herself. In the first clip, she encourages women to go on dates with men they’re not sexually attracted to, provided they aren’t just coffee dates. Even the rest of the panel was put off by this, as you’ll see. So, just like always, chopped men have to pay, just for the opportunity to talk to high value girlbosses. Secondly, she describes how Satan attacks one of her clients by sending very attractive (pagan) men to her. But if you listen carefully, it’s very clear this woman was solo traveling in Dubai and giving out her number (and probably more) to every hunk she could find. Otherwise, how was some rando Chad in Dubai able to contact this woman? CONCLUSION: Both clips indicate that this woman does not prioritize sexual purity with her clients, and this is a supposed Christian expert?! Until women reject this nonsense, men will continue to check out of the dating circus. It’s very hard for me to blame them…

Defiant Baptist

65,892 views • 7 months ago

💡 This woman used to work as a debt collector for fifteen years — and she just shared the one question she says would stop them cold every single time. All you have to do is ask: “Can you provide written proof that you have the legal right to collect this debt?” She claims most of the time they can’t, because debts get bought and sold for pennies on the dollar and the paperwork often isn’t even there. She said this question is our right under the FDCPA and that it shuts the whole thing down. Who thinks this is actually true? Anyone out there know from experience whether this works the way she described? I have no idea if what she’s saying is true or not, but I thought I’d share it just in case anyone is going through this.

💡 This woman used to work as a debt collector for fifteen years — and she just shared the one question she says would stop them cold every single time. All you have to do is ask: “Can you provide written proof that you have the legal right to collect this debt?” She claims most of the time they can’t, because debts get bought and sold for pennies on the dollar and the paperwork often isn’t even there. She said this question is our right under the FDCPA and that it shuts the whole thing down. Who thinks this is actually true? Anyone out there know from experience whether this works the way she described? I have no idea if what she’s saying is true or not, but I thought I’d share it just in case anyone is going through this.

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

186,546 views • 2 months ago

This woman is 28 years old and she is complaining about why her mortgage is going up in her starter house. First things first, her mortgage is $4300 a month in a very affluent area in Ohio. She received a notice saying that her mortgage is now going up to $4800 a month. If you don’t understand the purpose of a “starter house,” then maybe you should rent an apartment. A starter house isn’t one where you plan on staying in the rest of your life. It’s for building credit and good financial habits and responsibility. Second, she doesn’t understand that she has a fixed interest rate, it wasn’t her mortgage going up. Her taxes and insurance went up. Would she be better off just buying an actual starter house, it doesn’t seem like she understands the basics of home ownership?

This woman is 28 years old and she is complaining about why her mortgage is going up in her starter house. First things first, her mortgage is $4300 a month in a very affluent area in Ohio. She received a notice saying that her mortgage is now going up to $4800 a month. If you don’t understand the purpose of a “starter house,” then maybe you should rent an apartment. A starter house isn’t one where you plan on staying in the rest of your life. It’s for building credit and good financial habits and responsibility. Second, she doesn’t understand that she has a fixed interest rate, it wasn’t her mortgage going up. Her taxes and insurance went up. Would she be better off just buying an actual starter house, it doesn’t seem like she understands the basics of home ownership?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

372,968 views • 4 months ago

Romanticising this incident is a big mistake. You know why? Let me ask you a few questions. First of all, who is she? A random woman in public, right? That’s what most people think. Okay, fine. But let me ask you this: What if she was a Muslim? What if she looked middle-class or poor? What if she was a South Indian or a dark-skinned lady? What if she spoke only Marathi? Okay, understood. You’ll say that no matter who she is, she was questioning the right thing. Fine. Now answer these questions too: Is she representing the people or just herself? If she claims to represent the people, is she an elected representative? If not, then who is she? Once again the answer is.... She is just a random bold woman. Got it. What right does she have to abuse a bunch of people and the leaders who were democratically expressing their opinion? Did those people burn anything? Did they abuse anyone? Did they violate any rules? Did they initiate any violence? The answer is "No." (Well..you don't even go near to them if such thing happens right? ) Their demonstration was completely legal. They had taken proper permission from the police and the local administration. Whether their demands are RIGHT or WRONG is a separate debate, but the protest itself was lawful. This is how democracy works. Every citizen in a democratic country must understand and respect this process. This lady, however, comes across as a moron — an abuser and a selfish individual who has no right to question an organised, legally permitted crowd headed by democratically elected leader. In a country like India.. the largest democracy in the world...Every democratic step taken up by any is a step towards shaping the future of India. If she got delayed for something, say work or movie or meeting or any damn thing ..she should have dealt with it seperately. Only emergency is permitted during such situations .. You may fight of an ambulance is stopped..or any medical emergency is stopped... It happens rarely..! This is India. Billions of people are living with their daily struggles and necessities. Your individual needs or anger have zero value unless you organise your own people and stand against any wrong practice democratically — or fight it legally through proper channels. Abusing leaders, women, and common citizens in this manner is completely unacceptable & punishable. This kind of stereotyping and instant justice will never work in India. If you are rich, if you are fair skinned, if you are flaunting like a upper caste,if you are wearing expensive clothes, if you have a camera in your hand, if you have the audacity to abuse anyone, and if you can lose your temper in front of people without considering their democratic rights — then you are not a “superwoman.” you are a "Stupid Woman" You are just so stupid, entitled woman who has no understanding of this country or its people. And the bigger problem is this: whenever someone raises questions against the government or elected representatives in a nasty way, most of us start celebrating them without analysing the facts. This incident and the attitude shown towards the minister and the protesting people is not acceptable at all. Ask this lady when she last voted. Ask her who the Chief Minister of Maharashtra is. Ask her who the MLA of her constituency is. Ask her the name of her constituency. If she knew the answers to these basic questions, she would not have behaved this way. She is just another elitist who has zero respect for India’s political and democratic system. Her entire attitude reveals that she doesn’t care about the people or the government. You may cross-verify the facts if you disagree with this. #DemocracyInDanger #RespectDemocracy #MaharashtraPolitics #EntitledWoman #HypocrisyExposed #ProtestRights #IndianDemocracy #NoToAbuse #PoliticalAwareness #DoubleStandards

Romanticising this incident is a big mistake. You know why? Let me ask you a few questions. First of all, who is she? A random woman in public, right? That’s what most people think. Okay, fine. But let me ask you this: What if she was a Muslim? What if she looked middle-class or poor? What if she was a South Indian or a dark-skinned lady? What if she spoke only Marathi? Okay, understood. You’ll say that no matter who she is, she was questioning the right thing. Fine. Now answer these questions too: Is she representing the people or just herself? If she claims to represent the people, is she an elected representative? If not, then who is she? Once again the answer is.... She is just a random bold woman. Got it. What right does she have to abuse a bunch of people and the leaders who were democratically expressing their opinion? Did those people burn anything? Did they abuse anyone? Did they violate any rules? Did they initiate any violence? The answer is "No." (Well..you don't even go near to them if such thing happens right? ) Their demonstration was completely legal. They had taken proper permission from the police and the local administration. Whether their demands are RIGHT or WRONG is a separate debate, but the protest itself was lawful. This is how democracy works. Every citizen in a democratic country must understand and respect this process. This lady, however, comes across as a moron — an abuser and a selfish individual who has no right to question an organised, legally permitted crowd headed by democratically elected leader. In a country like India.. the largest democracy in the world...Every democratic step taken up by any is a step towards shaping the future of India. If she got delayed for something, say work or movie or meeting or any damn thing ..she should have dealt with it seperately. Only emergency is permitted during such situations .. You may fight of an ambulance is stopped..or any medical emergency is stopped... It happens rarely..! This is India. Billions of people are living with their daily struggles and necessities. Your individual needs or anger have zero value unless you organise your own people and stand against any wrong practice democratically — or fight it legally through proper channels. Abusing leaders, women, and common citizens in this manner is completely unacceptable & punishable. This kind of stereotyping and instant justice will never work in India. If you are rich, if you are fair skinned, if you are flaunting like a upper caste,if you are wearing expensive clothes, if you have a camera in your hand, if you have the audacity to abuse anyone, and if you can lose your temper in front of people without considering their democratic rights — then you are not a “superwoman.” you are a "Stupid Woman" You are just so stupid, entitled woman who has no understanding of this country or its people. And the bigger problem is this: whenever someone raises questions against the government or elected representatives in a nasty way, most of us start celebrating them without analysing the facts. This incident and the attitude shown towards the minister and the protesting people is not acceptable at all. Ask this lady when she last voted. Ask her who the Chief Minister of Maharashtra is. Ask her who the MLA of her constituency is. Ask her the name of her constituency. If she knew the answers to these basic questions, she would not have behaved this way. She is just another elitist who has zero respect for India’s political and democratic system. Her entire attitude reveals that she doesn’t care about the people or the government. You may cross-verify the facts if you disagree with this. #DemocracyInDanger #RespectDemocracy #MaharashtraPolitics #EntitledWoman #HypocrisyExposed #ProtestRights #IndianDemocracy #NoToAbuse #PoliticalAwareness #DoubleStandards

We Dravidians

11,784 views • 2 months ago

CNN just ROASTED Kamala for saying she wouldn't have done anything different than Biden on The View: "I'm surprised, frankly, that she doesn't have more to say about this...one of the main things she's been trying to establish as part of her candidacy is the idea that she would represent a break from the past four years." This is a change election and Kamala is just more of the same, only worse.

CNN just ROASTED Kamala for saying she wouldn't have done anything different than Biden on The View: "I'm surprised, frankly, that she doesn't have more to say about this...one of the main things she's been trying to establish as part of her candidacy is the idea that she would represent a break from the past four years." This is a change election and Kamala is just more of the same, only worse.

Charlie Kirk

1,662,642 views • 1 year ago