Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

181,377 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

James Griesbach's profile picture
James Griesbach1 year ago

Destroying art isn’t art. Like the guy that destroyed Punk History because it was punk. Art takes talent, destroying it doesn’t. Taking care of it is an art. Preserving it for future generations takes practice and patience.

"I'm a Free Born Man of the USA"'s profile picture
"I'm a Free Born Man of the USA"1 year ago

fArt

Nero's profile picture
Nero1 year ago

im lost for words here

Joyeuv Anna Nimity's profile picture
Joyeuv Anna Nimity1 year ago

I’m not in a high enough tax bracket to appreciate whatever this is

Arika 🇺🇸's profile picture
Arika 🇺🇸1 year ago

I was expecting a spectacular result. 😑

Jennifer's profile picture
Jennifer1 year ago

If I tried that, I’d probably burn down my house. I’ll stick to my paintbrushes. 😂

navE 🫠🇺🇸🎖️'s profile picture
navE 🫠🇺🇸🎖️1 year ago

I wonder if she has a full-time job or if she only does art cause I don’t get it

Ole TDub's profile picture
Ole TDub1 year ago

Art? Yes. Retarded? Also yes.

Spectralon's profile picture
Spectralon1 year ago

That is retarded

Dynamic_feel's profile picture
Dynamic_feel1 year ago

Do people show art like this? Show it because an attempt is being made to make a carbon copy of the painting by setting it on fire.